TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cautious_Fall7594 Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by Cautious_Fall7594 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I don’t disagree, but the original poster claimed that men preferred large perky breast which are rare even in youth. Marilyn Monroe also had implants. This study found that medium and larger breast were significantly perceived as more attractive compared to smaller boobs. Even in the study you posted there was a preference for medium or large breasts over small breasts indicating that men’s preference for breast size and fitness are likely split. The claim that men prefer smaller bust size base…
/r/RedPillWomen27/02/24 10:07 PM
1

I don’t disagree, but the original poster claimed that men preferred large perky breast which aren’t really a thing. Marilyn Monroe also had implants. The claim that men prefer smaller bust size based of the Malaysian study is untrue. This my comment from another sub: The “rich men prefer smaller breasts” study, explained People on Reddit always link to this study, but no one ever actually reads it. They claim that “that’s because rich men prefer thinner women,” but that’s somewhat inaccurate wh…
/r/RedPillWomen27/02/24 09:56 PM
0

The vast majority of young women who have large breasts do not also have perky breasts. Perkiness is largely a function of size. Unless you have a flexible definition of what you consider to be perky. If you agree that men like large breasts, then invariably than cannot be picky on perkiness because large perky breasts are rare. in this article, one of the factors that caused breast ptosis was just sheer breast size. if you sample young women and split the groups by bust volume it’s almost a gua…
/r/RedPillWomen27/02/24 10:00 AM
0

But men are also wired to find larger breasts attractive because it also signals fertility, so using evopsych doesn’t always explain everything.
/r/RedPillWomen26/02/24 09:59 PM
1

LOLLLL 4’8😭
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 11:54 AM
3

It’s not a joke. The halo effect is very real.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 09:54 PM
1

Become physically attractive, so people can view your faults as quirks.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 08:45 PM
4

These are not desirable characteristics especially in a man. In men, Blurting things out randomly is not going to be looked at as cool and quirky like it would in women. Men are expected to know social nuances. Once you also factor in the halo effect, a shy attractive guy is much preferable to most women compared to an loud unattractive guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 01:38 PM
3

How? The symptoms of high functioning autism are not attributes great to be perceived as fun and personable. There is not one particular way to be horrendous to be around. I’m sure you know people you don’t like, but they probably aren’t all identical in personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 01:32 PM
5

I don’t think a person that has high functional autism would be extroverted in a way that’s desirable. Being annoying is not preferred over being quiet. There’s not one way to be horrendous to be around. Some people don’t know social cues. Some are annoying. Some talk to much. Some are too blunt. Some are too quiet, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 01:28 PM
1

Like I said someone with high functional autism is probably horrendous to be around. (No offense). You are using an extreme example, the majority of men with a “boring/shy” personality do not have autism.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 01:18 PM
30

No, a good looking guy with the first personality will just be perceived as an introverted old soul and be endearing to women. Personality, only really matters if you an absolute jerk or just horrendous to be around.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 12:11 PM
1

I think that’s true for 6’6 and beyond, but not for 6’4. From a woman’s perspective, I think taller is better until you hit 6’5. Because 6’4 is towering over the general population while 6’1 is like kinda tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/22 09:49 PM
1

You right I’m kind of reading into things. I guess my thing was 150 isn’t that large.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 08:14 PM
1

My bad! I keep saying curvy because that just means weight distribution primarily to boobs and butt. My point is that you can have that and not be above 150 pounds. If that makes sense. Like Kim K is “curvy” but is still very small.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 08:09 PM
1

Then that would exclude smaller women that are pear and hourglass shaped that would also fit in the category of “… fat distribution is mainly to boobs or butt”
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 07:37 PM
1

That’s true. However your question is broad. When most people think thick and curvy. They aren’t thinking of a pear shaped women that’s 400 pounds.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 07:32 PM
2

Curvy and thick is not the same as BBW, and you can be small and curvy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 07:26 PM
5

Yes. But the original statement you responded to is kind of illogical. It’s nearly impossible for a man to be hot and fat, almost all male beauty standards correlate to low/moderate body fat levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 05:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter