TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CawlinAlcarz Archive

View 17 posts and 1,949 comments by CawlinAlcarz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
221

Social IssuesCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights12/09/22 08:55 PM
193

HumourCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights13/09/22 04:36 PM
101

Marriage/ChildrenCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights23/02/22 04:37 PM
99

Marriage/ChildrenCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:05 PM
90

Legal RightsCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights20/10/22 01:49 PM
89

GeneralCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:40 PM
44

Marriage/ChildrenCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights14/10/22 06:03 PM
44

ProgressCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights29/12/22 04:09 PM
31

HumourCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights13/12/22 08:31 PM
20

Social IssuesCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights22/02/22 05:11 PM
7

HumourCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:31 PM
4

HumourCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights24/02/22 03:14 AM
4

GeneralCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights25/08/22 01:06 PM
2

HumourCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights21/09/22 03:34 PM
1

HumourCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights24/02/22 02:23 AM
1

HumourCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights21/09/22 03:30 PM
0

Marriage/ChildrenCawlinAlcarz/r/MensRights07/02/22 09:49 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,949 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I don't know if you're being sarcastic and obtuse, but I related it with the intention of sharing it as a metaphor. In my personal case it was one of dozens of actual examples - most more significant than ice cream - of being the lowest priority in the household.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 01:01 AM
2

This story is not about who does the grocery shopping, or who pays for what, or you not wanting to share, or anything like that. If someone focuses on those parts, they are intentionally trying to obfuscate the truth, which is that you, as the man in a household with a woman and some other guy's kids are expected to behave and contribute like a proper parent, but will forever be the lowest priority and last consideration.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 12:40 AM
14

I've dated and lived with my share of single mothers and have come to the conclusion like many others, that it is just not ideal. I tell the story that I call "the chocolate ice cream story" to people to try and give them sort of a metaphor for why it sucks to be a man in the household with a woman and some other guy's kids. Let's say, for example, that the kid's favorite ice cream flavor is strawberry. Meanwhile, their mother's favorite ice cream is vanilla and your favorite ice cream is chocol…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 12:18 AM
27

I wonder how many of them realize that the weight they lost after the divorce that lets them put that ring on their middle finger might have contributed to their divorce in the first place? Seriously though, please wear that ring on your middle fingers, ladies, let us all know right off the bat which of you to leave on the streets.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 11:35 AM
1

Well that's probably right. My recollection is vastly flawed. What I do know is that the arguments for the pooling of world cup and tournament money are completely dishonest. It is very much like the bullshit arguments in tennis. Bottom line: people don't want to pay pro sport prices for seats to games with amateur level (relative) performance. At the end of the day, with soccer, at least, we're only talking about the national team compensation. Played still earn the majority of their income fro…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:39 AM
2

In fact, that's what I heard, though haven't confirmed. AFAIK it has to do with the differences in the overall structuring of royalties before they even get into the profit "sharing" the men's team has to give them.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:17 AM
8

These discussions are a bad fucking joke. The arguments that the women should be paid the same are among the most dishonest arguments there are. This goes for the US men's and women's national soccer teams too.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 02:47 AM
1

Look, I'm not saying what we or society SHOULD do. I'm just saying what actually do, right now.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 03:34 AM
1

I mentioned that in the third bullet point in the post you replied to. Another way of looking at it: Men tend to choose careers that deal with things, women tend to choose careers that deal with people. (This speaks to tendencies only, in the aggregate, and certainly variations exist on an individual level. )
/r/MensRights08/06/26 12:18 AM
14

There are a number of incorrect "sacred cows" in feminist rhetoric. This is one of them, along with the wage gap (essentially nonexistent in the western world), the rates of domestic violence (women commit nearly as much or more as/than men), and the rates of paternity fraud (it is considerably higher than conventional wisdom allows). It won't matter how much information you show people about the errors of these perceptions or reactions or studies showing the truth, thru cannot hear them. Ask yo…
/r/MensRights04/06/26 01:23 AM
1

So, trans women = no Trans men might be yes Post menopausal women = no. How do you know when the woman is truly post menopausal, and not just peri-memopausal? Again, I'm curious if these days must be taken one per month or if they can be saved up. Whaddya say?
/r/MensRights01/06/26 08:35 PM
6

Let's split the difference and call it about 45 years... (some folks start work at age 18, some start at 21/23 after college). Let's call that 20 years old on average. Some work to 62, others to 65, some to 70. Let's call that 65 as an average retirement age. This makes 45 years, and about 2 years of overall PTO if 12 extra days/year are taken. When you want to talk about "shaving that time off" (knowing full well that most private sector pensions are long gone here in the US), do you advocate p…
/r/MensRights01/06/26 07:46 PM
57

Over the course of about a 50 year work life, this amounts to just under 2.5 years of additional PTO/early retirement. I mean, I guess it would be reasonable if men got 2.5 years of PTO at the end of their careers, and not just 2.5 years less pay.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 12:29 PM
58

There are about 260 working days in a year in the US. 12 days is about 4.6% of that working year. Anyone who is not an idiot knows that the so-called "pay gap" in the west here is not the result of women doing the same work for less pay (which would be illegal) but rather its an EARNINGS gap applied over the entirety of the working life of women, and it has to do with things like the following: Women tend not to work as many hours in a job outside the home as men do. Women tend not to work as ma…
/r/MensRights01/06/26 12:24 PM
42

All you have to do is artificially inflate female HS grades and deflate male HS grades, and displace males from STEM college studies by giving DEI scholarships to underqualified female applicants, and bingo: you have a ton of female STEM grads and a reduction in the number of males who even went to college because their spots were taken by underqualified females who went to school for reduced cost or for free. Then you get to say that in your industry, driven by private equity forced DEI initiat…
/r/MensRights25/05/26 08:06 PM
3

I made my point and backed it up with some sources. You want to argue the validity of my sources, but I guarantee that if I posted the long form videos or the articles laced with legalese, that you'd be all "TL;DR derp derp hurrrhurrr". The bottom line is that if you have some evidence that what I said and backed up with sources is untrue you need to post it. Otherwise you're just another dipshit thinking you have a point when you don't.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 12:55 AM
9

And they're ready to vote.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 07:55 PM
9

Follow the money. There is a lot of data on this out there. You just have to look and see.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 06:50 PM
14

I posted at length on this, in this sub, a couple years ago, linking long form videos and articles on the topic. You don't get to pretend like it's not the same as it was just because you don't like the truth of it. Title IV-D was enacted in 1975. There is plenty of data about all of the things I've stated and those videos asserted. I've presented those as evidence of it. If you have evidence to the contrary, other than your dislike of the facts I've presented here, please do post it.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 06:47 PM
17

I guess you haven't done much research on this topic, eh? https://youtube.com/shorts/dAcVLMtLDIc?si=YL3huhJs6XD5fqzP https://youtube.com/shorts/2EuHwm6VNRQ?si=Phek0t6UMjOOzmi6 https://youtube.com/shorts/vnBnLE1ecrM?si=S97sgEu_tEgMWKED
/r/MensRights24/05/26 05:24 PM
30

It's actual federal funding to incentivize states to enforce and collect child support under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act. The state itself gets the money from the federal government. Look it up on YouTube or just Google it. There will be plenty of information about how it works. Texas usually leads the nation in Title IV-D revenues.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 05:00 PM
166

The courts will uphold the papers he signed giving up parental rights because custody and support payments are totally separate issues in the eyes of the courts. The reason for that is that the courts do not get paid by the federal government for making sure joint custody is assured. In fact, the courts are DISINCENTIVISED to award equal custody because that usually reduces child support (to the point of often negating it entirely), which reduces their revenue from federal kickbacks.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 02:52 PM
184

I've been telling y'all, that if you donate to the DIY turkey baster method of AI, you could be liable for child support. It doesn't matter what you signed. The court will ignore it unless you use a licensed fertility clinic/doctor. Hell I'll be surprised if states don't start awarding child support even when you do use licensed clinics/doctors. It's not about following the law, it's about realizing that the State WANTS to make someone pay child support. Not only do they lighten their welfare ro…
/r/MensRights24/05/26 02:42 PM
11

You sound like someone who hasn't looked very deeply into this issue. Understand the reasons why things are the way they are right now and you'll understand how to actually combat them. Start with the abolishing of "no fault" divorce as the default. Then legislate the establishment of a default of 50/50 custody of children in a divorce. Then, legislate mandatory DNA testing in ALL potential child support cases in ALL states. You do those things and you'll start to see the child support money mac…
/r/MensRights15/05/26 08:28 PM
14

Please don't tell me that you think the government would balk for a second at the thought of theft from an individual.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 07:44 PM
90

Courts block tests so the state doesn't have to pay child support if paternity is not established. Of course women who are not sure if the guy paying support is the actual babydaddy (or when they KNOW he is not) protest the test, and courts uphold that because of the above. ANY other rationale given for the denial of a paternity test is a crock of shit. Also, in the US at least, don't forget that not only does the state lighten its costs via taking people off its welfare rolls, it actually PROFI…
/r/MensRights15/05/26 05:28 PM
1

You're right that the current economy isn't helping anyone. The answer is not to reduce the world's population by 40% though, no matter what Greta Thunberg's puppeteers tell you. We are seeing the predation of private equity (the most effective tool of the globalists) whose stated goal is: "We (private equity) will own everything, and you (the people) will own nothing." This was not a secret that slipped out of a crazy guy's mouth and was captured by accident. This came right out of the mouth of…
/r/MensRights09/05/26 06:21 PM
6

I think you need to take a look at what economists are saying, rather than what globalists or Greta Thunberg types have to say about this.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 02:40 PM
43

As birth rates drop to catastrophic levels (hint: we are closer to this than most people realize), things are going to get crazy in the legal realm with regard to pregnancies, IVF, and state financial support of mothers and newborns. Presently IVF is EXPENSIVE: like 6-figure expensive - per child. Further, there is a MUCH lower chance to reverse a vasectomy than most realize - to the point that one should treat it as effectively permanent. So, in my mind, the strategy of banking sperm and gettin…
/r/MensRights09/05/26 11:59 AM
-2

Who do you think is spending the money on the cosmetics? Yes, also white women of the west prefer the aesthetics, that's true, but by and large they're the ones also buying the cosmetics.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 10:31 PM
-7

Holy crap, bro. Use paragraphs. With that said, all you need to know about this issue is: "follow the money."
/r/MensRights06/05/26 09:30 PM
1

Let me guess: sentence will be time served and 2 years probation. It should be death, or life without parole if not in a death penalty state.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 04:11 PM
28

What's hilarious is the number of women calling surrogacy exploitive and so forth when it's perpetrated by a couple dozen men a year. Meanwhile hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of women exploit the same process every year, except they get paid for 18 years, not just a lump sum at birth.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 01:18 AM
2

There is no such thing as a gender pay gap in the western world. If it were legal to pay women less than men for the same work, nobody would hire men, period. After you control for everything, you find that any differences in pay are within the limits of the error in the calculations and estimates. You do see a gender based earnings gap over lifetime but that is related to women and men choosing different professions, women working fewer hours and years, etc. In other words, the earnings gap (wh…
/r/MensRights22/04/26 10:42 PM
-1

No. I'm telling you that falling for ragebait thread titles without looking at the facts of the story, then flying off the handle over that wildly exaggerated title makes you look like a bunch of pearl-clutching whiners and doesn't help the cause at all.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 01:38 AM
3

I've been saying this.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 01:33 AM
1

Have you seen the way Title IX is abused? This is astonishingly small potatoes compared other abuses in this area.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 06:17 PM
-11

I'm sure you're correct, but you should pick your battles.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 06:12 PM
-10

At that point it might be worth looking into it to see if it's worth making more of a stink about.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 05:57 PM
-25

Looks like it's only part of the place for one hour, on Mondays and Tuesdays. I don't know if this is a hill to die on unless it expands. The rationale behind it is garbage, of course, and things in the US today, at least, are moving away from this kind of claptrap outside of academia.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 05:28 PM
102

Rule of thumb: Never mind what women SAY, pay attention to what women DO.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 11:19 AM
0

5 year old article about a 10 year old paper.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 01:39 PM
19

If you could pay women 16% less than men for the same job and same performance, no men would be employed except in jobs so dangerous, difficult, or dirty that women refuse to do them. Once you control for all the relevant things like ACTUAL job position/title, experience, performance, hours worked, etc. you find that any difference in ACTUAL PAY for equivalent work is WELL within the limits of error for the calculations. What you ACTUALLY find also is that women generally have an overall "EARNIN…
/r/MensRights25/03/26 01:17 AM
13

Women in the west could NEVER survive if they were held even half as accountable for their actions as men are.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 12:01 AM
4

There will be more and more rulings like this as the West begins to understand the catastrophic impact of the reduced birth rate of the past few decades.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 02:59 AM
11

Feminists will always claim that women's sports are underfunded, but the reality is that Title IX (in the US) ensures that women's sports in academic environments at least, are actually overfunded for the desired participation rates and potential for revenue generation. As for professional sports, women's sports simply do not put asses in seats, and that's the truth. There is no women's sport where women are more competitive than men are except maybe the Iditarod race across Alaska. People just …
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:04 PM
10

This is all about World War Trans and TERFs, which is hilarious, considering how Germany likes to present itself to the world. I guess the TERFs are winning in Germany.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 03:20 PM
4

No. Nearly 1 in 4 suicides is a woman.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 10:50 AM
66

Misandry is the same thing as misogyny, except it is towards/about men, not women.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 11:46 PM
3

I say "sure" if it's coffee.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 09:37 PM
18

The audacity of these women is galling. Seriously. Lock 'em up!
/r/MensRights05/02/26 02:34 PM
9

I don't know why it's so fucking hard for governments to acknowledge double standards in the law (or in its enforcement) and abolish them.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 02:53 PM
3

Reading is fundamental, chief. The leftist policies to subvert the nuclear family with disastrous effects on African Americans is what was being discussed. The Racialized Nature of Child Welfare Policies and the Social Control of Black Bodies - PMC https://share.google/gpvDAEyq00ISoR21N
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:00 AM
13

The reason men get hit hard when the family breaks down is because the government (by way of the court system) continues to extract resources from the man to support the woman, regardless of whose decision or transgression led to the dissolution of the marriage. This extraction is done without consideration for impoverishing the man... yay no-fault divorce and federal kickbacks incentivizing states to adjudicate maximum amounts of child support. As for the dissolution of the family unit, that's …
/r/MensRights25/01/26 04:34 PM
34

Feminism is a movement with a leftist agenda. One of the stated goals of feminism and leftists is to disrupt and do away with the nuclear family. Look how well it worked with black America.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 02:53 PM
21

[Quote]A 2021 article in The Psychiatric Times estimates that false abuse allegations appear in 2% to 35% of all cases involving children.[/quote] Lol, that is a statistic that the author or publication did NOT want to print.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 05:11 PM
53

This article is absolute rubbish, and every statement made in it needs to be vetted for accuracy. For example, joint custody of children should be the defacto state of things (setting aside PROVEN issues with one parent or the other). The only reason women bitch about this is because it often reduces the child support they get. Additionally, the claims of abusive fathers getting custody so often are very likely an indictment of how frequently women make false accusations of abuse in divorce proc…
/r/MensRights01/01/26 04:41 PM
1

The first time I thought about how I aligned politically was when I was 16 in high school (1986). I thought I was liberal because I wanted to be able to smoke pot without getting in trouble. I was definitely a NORML type of guy. Ironically, that's also when I started working as a W2 employee and seeing taxes coming out of my "tipped" minimum wage salary (at the time, minimum wage was $3.35, tipped min. wage was $2.01, and I was a busboy in a restaurant.) I made an extra $60 or $80 a week in unta…
/r/MensRights28/12/25 01:36 AM
60

It is correct that this issue is created by "no fault divorce," default custody, the resultant exorbitant, and lopsided child support awards which not only incentivizes women to divorce, but incentivizes the state courts to make the custodial arrangements as lopsided as possible to maximize their own federal financial kickbacks. It is impossible to credibly argue that the state of family law does not incentivize women to divorce frivolously. The facts are evident. These women don't even know why…
/r/MensRights27/12/25 12:36 AM
11

When reading statistics like this, it's important to understand how they arrived at the "total number of rapes" figure? a) What sort of "estimates" of unreported rapes are included in that total. b) What definition of rape is being used? Does an estimated occurrence of SA, such as the grab of an ass cheek count towards that "rape" total? c) How are false accusations handled in the statistics? Think about these questions when you see such statements and the very specific wording used.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 08:50 PM
9

What about the men who don't feel safe in the workplace when they are interacting with, or have to supervise female colleagues?
/r/MensRights22/12/25 08:01 PM
26

It'll be difficult to make the case for all of us who have been laid off.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 03:38 AM
43

It has been my experience that much of the mental load that women complain about is related to planning things that the women want to do that men would otherwise not bother with.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 02:24 AM
3

Chivalry is the name for deference paid by men towards women. It used to be a thing which was, in essence, traded for the deference of women towards men. Not only have men stopped receiving this deference, but they are now reviled and disenfranchised. Why would someone offer deference for such treatment?
/r/MensRights10/12/25 03:04 AM
1

I got you.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:19 PM
1

I didn't mean to imply you were! I was just being silly about that whole debacle, especially in light of your remark.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 01:10 PM
1

~Lia Thomas has entered the discussion~
/r/MensRights13/11/25 12:57 PM
22

This mystery was solved. The female psyche is like a man's, after you take away reason and accountability.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 09:30 AM
3

Two things: 1) At least the UK still has Men-only clubs. 2) This is a fuckin' disaster... one we've been watching slowly unfold for a few decades. The best line of the whole article is this: The real measure of inclusivity in the Army is simple: will the person next to you pull you out of a ditch under fire? Everything else is pageantry.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 08:29 PM
147

Remember, nearly 1 in 4 suicides is a woman!
/r/MensRights01/11/25 04:24 PM
3

Women demanded access to men-only spaces, and when they got it, they took issue with men being in those spaces.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 08:59 PM
1

Women (or men) who participate in such subreddits are beneath my consideration and should be beneath all of yours, too.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 12:21 PM
3

Are you saying that women (en masse) are making illogical leaps of logic? UNPOSSIBLE, GOOD SIR, UNPOSSIBLE!
/r/MensRights21/10/25 04:50 PM
3

Your entire argument is subjective. You provide no info other than that you just like it better being treated like a dude. If you want to be taken seriously (which I doubt - I think this is juvenile troll) you should go read the accounts of other trans men and address what they've said and compare with your own (imaginary?) experiences.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 02:30 PM
6

This is not a good faith question. This is akin to asking: How come everyone hates Brussels sprouts? I fkn love Brussels sprouts. Before I ate Brussels sprouts, I ate broccoli, and I fkn hate broccoli even though everyone else says Brussels sprouts are worse than broccoli!
/r/MensRights15/10/25 02:13 PM
8

In the US and Europe, same job, same experience, same performance = same wage. The supposed differences in wages based on gender alone are within the error margins for the analyses and sometimes favor women.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 03:30 PM
25

Generally speaking, men pay the most in taxes because men work the most and account for the majority of the income earned that is taxed. People will tell you that this is about the "wage gap," but unless they clarify it to mean that women just work fewer hours, for fewer years (which makes it a voluntary EARNINGS gap) then you can laugh at them. The wage gap has been so thoroughly debunked in recent years that people should be ashamed to even speak the term, let alone use it as an argument. It's…
/r/MensRights10/09/25 11:24 PM
18

Let's look at the terms used and see if we can glean any hints: RADICAL FEMINIST
/r/MensRights29/08/25 12:18 PM
1

The NFL is scripted theater intended to enrich corporate interests, and frankly, it has an overall negative effect on our national education systems (that's another long post). I can not imagine anything I'd be less interested in than the state of NFL cheerleaders unless it would be male cheerleaders in the NFL. NFL cheerleaders are for eye candy ONLY. The NFL barely pays them. The whole deal is intended to give these women some sort of potential springboard into modeling or tv/movies by giving …
/r/MensRights19/08/25 04:33 PM
2

Chase money, excellence. Upon achieving them, comfort will be affordable. Bonus: Women will chase you. But honestly, chasing comfort might be the bigger issue with the younger generation. In the past, I would have said chasing women was the ruination more often.
/r/MensRights17/08/25 02:43 PM
29

In the dictionary entry for "mixed signals" there is a link to this thread.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 08:27 PM
5

Without crashing and without a false accusation.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 01:04 PM
9

A thing to remember is that people like this Francke actually intend to be divisive, but they are acting that way because they believe their side will prevail when the divisiveness gets to a point of conflict that requires management interaction.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 02:15 PM
18

Meh, fuck 'em.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 11:42 AM
7

OF COURSE many women hate it when any men have standards because ALL women have been told relentlessly over the past 10 or more years that they are ALL 10/10s. This whole campaign to improve women's perception of themselves is propagated by a lot of things that aren't really the topic of this post, so I won't go into them, but that is the reason, at the core of it, for why so many women cannot tolerate any man's standards with regard to them - they believe they are all desirable and deserving of…
/r/MensRights31/05/25 02:00 PM
3

The propaganda is going to continue to ramp up as most of these women approach 30-35 and begin to feel entitled to the attention and resources of the "nice" guys who have forsaken them because they ignored those nice guys while they were in their 20s and getting run through at house parties.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 02:42 AM
3

Fuck no... but unlike many of you guys in younger generations, the entirety of the public school system wasn't trying to foist a bunch of agenda driven horseshit on me every single day, so I get why some of you were fooled. The important thing is that you figured it out.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 01:35 AM
200

Don't try to understand women. Women understand women, and they hate each other. -- Al Bundy
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:31 AM
2

I know I'm going to Hell for this, but this is a Special Olympics argument. It doesn't really matter who wins. Both participants are Special Olympians. Your best bet, OP, is to just walk away from this ridiculous argument. There is nothing to gain, and nobody will change their mind.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 05:24 PM
199

But but but, that man was a victim. He was probably being trafficked, and his pimpette was probably keeping him addicted to drugs to coerce him into subjecting himself to the female gaze with all its dehumanizing damage to his psyche, resulting in him feeling devalued as a human being!
/r/MensRights16/02/25 11:32 PM
2

It's a stupid shithead argument based on the fact that this woman doesn't think that a man being legally and financially held responsible for a child he was tricked into conceiving is punished. Typical solipsistic horseshit.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 01:12 AM
8

I generally don't entertain or participate in such ridiculous discussions. There are men out there who feel that men should not involve themselves in "women's affairs" because they consider the things that women concern themselves with to be beneath their own consideration. When women start parroting debunked bullshit or subjectively trying to make everything about men's failures using their tortured anti-logic, that perspective makes a lot more sense to me.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 09:09 PM
3

Probably 75 to 85% of the things heterosexual women do to maintain their appearance are done for each other rather than for men. I don't even listen to arguments that attempt to put this on men.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 02:26 PM
0

Who knew that when you subsidize a thing, you get more of it?
/r/MensRights29/01/25 11:50 PM
15

That was her plan from the beginning.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 02:02 PM
15

EVERY divorce that happens with the wife giving a reason like "he was too focused on his career, never spent quality time with me/the family" is the punchline of a con job where the woman either got involved with the man for money or status or both.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 02:02 PM
7

They just roll it into child support or take it out in the front-loaded settlement.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 12:22 AM
28

Foolishly, the Girl Scouts allowed themselves to become little more than a cookie marketing organization that exploited underage labor. With that said, they could have simply become an organization that did all the stuff BSA did, but that would have reduced the profits their cookie overlords demand. Finally, and sadly, the BSA was failing and had to reorganize itself massively. Adding a possible membership stream with girls was one of the few options they had to stay in business.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 06:13 PM
7

It says that when you incentivize a thing, you get more of it.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 12:22 AM
17

Bread Pitt and Johnny Depp have both learned the hard way about sticking their dicks in crazy. Further, both Pitt and Depp are excellent examples of the way substance abuse can fuck your life over, and the lives of your loved ones around you. Finally, the women these men married and later were divorced from are further proof of the adage: "No matter how hot the woman is, someone, somewhere, is sick of her shit." As for the terms of the divorce, it's not really something that concerns me. Pitt is…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 01:25 PM
2

Ladies nights USED to be all about increasing the number of women in a venue where people tended to hang out, rather than just go for a meal - like dance clubs, or sports bars or the like. The idea was of course intended to entice more women into the place, and thereby entice more men to come in and stay longer as they attempted to interact with the women. Some 30 years ago, a local sportsbar type of venue (it was a LARGE bar/pub/restaurant type of venue) near my home town went as far as to have…
/r/MensRights03/01/25 06:41 PM
7

Generally speaking, in the US, if you donate to a licensed sperm bank, and the person who uses your sperm does not know you, you will not get saddled with child support. This can break down when you do something like make a donation through a "private" contract - not using a licensed sperm bank. It doesn't matter what you and any other parties sign in a "private" contract regarding sperm donation, the courts can and WILL override your "private" contract to be held not liable for child support if…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 01:05 AM
30

This can only help MRA. Though MRA watchdog groups need to get on the info to ensure accuracy and to highlight judges who deny the requests.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 02:54 AM
1

Correlative bias in this whole thing. I.e. they were looking for the data to support their preconceived conclusion, excluded data that did not, and selectively interpreted the data they did gather. It's garbage. Pay it no mind. It's women the world around who are panicing about not being married. It's the social reconstructionists that are attempting to convince women that they should not be doing this because their ultimate aim is to destroy the nuclear family.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 04:03 PM
14

You need to bear in mind that what he's talking about here is a so-called "tradcon" household, where the wife is a SAHM and the husband is the only one working outside the home to provide financial resources. The giveaway is when he says to men that "...you as THE provider...". This is him referring to that sort of arrangement. To be fair, he's correct. If you are the sole breadwinner in a household, you had better not be spending a dime on recreational shit for yourself (or anyone else in your …
/r/MensRights23/12/24 05:58 PM
17

This is not true exactly, in the United States, at least. In general, therapists are required to obtain a client's signature on an "informed consent" document which legally needs to include certain rules about things like confidentially (this is also covered under the requirements of the therapist's licensure). The rules about what the therapist will keep in confidence and what things the therapist must report must be laid out in that informed consent paperwork, even if the therapist only verbal…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 02:46 PM
18

This therapist is absolutely unethical, and is extremely biased against you (likely against men, in general). This is also almost CERTAINLY the reason why her services have been obtained by the court. Further, she will keep you paying for your weekly visits for basically ever - because this is what the courts want her to do and it gets her paid. Report her, do what you can to have her license revoked. Be aware that the courts will protect this therapist though.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 02:36 PM
4

Haha, OK, fair enough. I guess I don't read enough Vox articles to know that, but I'll take your word for it with this VERY strong and supporting example!
/r/MensRights13/12/24 06:43 PM
6

Well, you're right that I'd be surprised (and pleasantly so) if those trends are showing up in the aggregate.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 06:42 PM
23

Of course. This is the most myopic, tone deaf, one-sided article I've ever read outside of election rhetoric.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 06:15 PM
14

LOL, as if Kate, with her college degree and 6 figure salary, is going to marry Jack with HS diploma and his 5 figure blue-collar salary. Kate is going to marry someone with a higher 6 figure salary than she makes because community property laws for marriage incentivize this behavior and disincentivize Kate from marrying someone who earns less than she does.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 06:13 PM
90

What a steaming pile of garbage. This article completely ignores the fact that community property laws render all earnings and assets acquired during the marriage as jointly owned 50/50. Upon dissolution of the marriage - regardless of how much she ACTUALLY contributed to the community assets of the marriage, she gets 50% of it all, and we all know how much uglier that division of assets and earnings gets when kids are involved, not to even mention alimony. The article uses an example of a man m…
/r/MensRights13/12/24 06:08 PM
50

If the genders were reversed, the accused male would be in the hospital or morgue because he would have "resisted arrest," and if he actually made it to trial, would be looking at a life sentence.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 05:20 PM
68

Ask ANY divorce attorney what their experience is when dealing with a female breadwinner in a divorce. The women find out they owe child support and/or alimony and/or a portion of the business/practice they own to their male spouse they flip the fuck out. Hell, there are social media meltdowns from women breadwinners finding out they'll have to pay in the divorce settlement. I'd be curious what the percentage of wealthy women with prenups looks like compared to the percentage of wealthy men with…
/r/MensRights04/12/24 04:37 PM
1

If you understood the term, you'd understand why that question had nothing to do with emotional intelligence. Why do you keep insisting that this question is relevant?
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:30 AM
1

Asked and answered. You still don't understand what emotional intelligence is.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:07 AM
2

In the West, divorce is actually heavily incentivized for women by the family court system. Also, women no longer need men to go out and kill saber toothed tigers while they nurse infants. They DO need resources (cash), and the family court system sees to that. But seriously, go educate yourself before you make any more innane arguments. Pretending I've said the things you are wilfully misinterpreting didn't make you clever. It just perpetuates your ignorance.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:02 AM
1

You don't see it adding up because you don't understand the terms that are being used. Google emotional intelligence and see what all it entails.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:19 AM
1

OK so first things first: I stated several times above that I was speaking in aggregates/averages, rather than hard and fast black or white rules that every single individual adheres to completely. WHEN speaking in aggregates like this, as long as the outliers are relatively few in number, even if they are WAY WAY outside the normal distribution, generally serves to strengthen the argument that the trend or the aggregate tends to behave in a certain way. For starters, your use of "psychopaths" a…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 12:27 AM
5

First, you need to understand what emotional intelligence actually IS. Emotional intelligence is not JUST about being aware of your own emotions and regulating them, it is about being aware of OTHERS emotions and being adept at managing those relationships. Further, I'm going to speak in aggregates and not in absolute truths on an individual level. Certainly there will be individuals that are exactly the opposite of what I'm about to talk about, but in general, the things I am going to talk abou…
/r/MensRights01/12/24 04:29 PM
7

This is standard operating procedure for divorces. When a woman approaches an attorney to start divorce proceedings, the attorney will ask if the man has ever hit or abused the woman - if the woman answers no, the attorney will go through a list of things that could be considered "abuse" such as the man raising his voice to yell at her during arguments, etc. A friend of mine who had a somewhat contentious divorce about 30 years ago who then eventually got to a reasonably cordial co-parenting rel…
/r/MensRights01/12/24 03:35 PM
5

If you get attacked by a pit bull, you are at least allowed to defend yourself. Little known fact: if you stick your thumb in the ass of a dog that's attacking you, you run a pretty good chance that the dog will stop biting you. I don't need to tell anyone what would happen to you if you did that to a woman who was attacking you...
/r/MensRights23/11/24 06:38 PM
15

So if I'm honest, I don't really understand the irony that OP is asserting either, at least not from this X post alone. I see from other comments that this might have something to do with the trans movement, but I'm unable to understand any further context to her remark about being attacked as a bigot from the X comment alone. Is the assertion that it's ironic that the radical left has attacked her because she strives to exclude trans women from the group of women whose rights she's fighting for…
/r/MensRights20/11/24 04:43 PM
2

This.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 12:43 PM
22

Lol. Look, it's the poster girl for "Don't stick your dick in crazy!"
/r/MensRights12/11/24 07:19 PM
24

That tells you an awful lot about how that firm operates. Bush league nonsense.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 03:11 PM
40

Who knew that working more hours and less desirable shifts would lead to getting paid more and getting shift differential rates???
/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:14 PM
1

That's the name of the guy in the article. You have to read past the title.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:28 PM
10

Right now feminism is telling women that "their rights" mean that they get what they want all the time, regardless of whatever anyone else wants and regardless of who actually owns or created what they want. If them not getting their way on everything from the job they want to the lawmakers they want to the resources we produce that they want means they're going to keep throwing temper tantrums, I promise you that there are plenty of other women that are reasonable and who want a legitimate GIVE…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:26 PM
23

You have to realize that they spent 30 years convincing people that dads were NOT important. One book called "The Bell Curve" told the story pretty well as far as data was concerned, but lots of people didn't like those facts, so here we are.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 12:41 AM
95

These women need to start caring a little bit more about civics classes than they do about whatever fucktardery they're watching on TikTok.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 09:07 PM
6

Well the news media covers what they can sell... and they sell sensationalism... and further, as I think about this story, I think I may have had one of the details wrong... I think the actual number of female workplace deaths did not increase appreciably, but male workplace deaths DECREASED. This had the effect of making the female workplace deaths (not appreciably changed in actual number from the previous year) a larger percentage of the whole - again, by virtue of male workplace deaths going…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:10 PM
6

What decisions? To make an inquiry? Who cares? Why does that matter? The point was again - about how statistics are exaggerated for effect - and how in general, people don't really care about it until it has some effect on women... hence the suicide numbers I posted in the same reply which are much more current.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:56 PM
6

This was YEARS ago... like decades... and I related the story of it just as an anecdote about how statistics and women's issues are given more coverage and are presented in the most exaggerated way possible in order to garner attention. It might have been a story I heard from Bettina Arndt, maybe before her.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:49 PM
2

Gossip is regarded as sinful and definitely immoral in Christianity and Judaism (dunno about other religions), and I was going to mention it in my post above, but I figured all the edgelord atheists around here would get sore vaginas about any mention of religion.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 03:41 PM
1

Who knew that providing financial assistance, on the order of wage replacement, not just legal fees, to people who claim to be victims of SA/DV would lead to an increase in false claims of SA/DV? I mean... what a completely unforeseen thing... totally unpossible!!!! /s
/r/MensRights07/11/24 03:19 PM
9

So every year, statistics on workplace accidental deaths are compiled and reported. As you might expect, the overwhelmingly vast majority of workplace deaths occur in fields like construction, commercial fishing, heavy industrial stuff, etc. As you might ALSO expect, the overwhelmingly vast majority of these workplace accidental deaths happened to men, who almost exclusively perfrom these sorts of jobs. So anyway, one year, thhe number of workplace deaths of WOMEN were recorded and the number ha…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 03:17 PM
25

Well, Shapiro is Jewish, and traditionally Jews have generally regarded circumcision as mandatory (though it's less so today) and while Muslims do not regard circumcision as mandatory, it might as well be also for them. With that said, all the so-called "medical" reasons for circumcision have been debunked and/or invalidated by the advent of modern plumbing and hygiene. There are occaional issues that make circumcision necessary, but these are rare occurrences and are not a reasonable justificat…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:23 PM
3

If you pay attention, you will see that this is pretty much the way of things, and it always has been. Ask any close female friend, or perhaps even just draw on experiences you've likely had with them... women LOSE THEIR EVERLOVING MINDS if they find out that someone has been talking about them behind their back. Why? Because they KNOW how viciously toxic and shitty they are when they talk behind other peoples' backs, and they know the purpose of such talk is to really ruin the subject of it. As…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:36 PM
5

Arguing on the internet is like the special Olympics... it doesn't really matter who wins. You're both... "special."
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:52 AM
3

Yeah, man, you are most welcome! I went through this in the early 1990s (but then the Monica Lewinsky thing set the whole early version of pound me too back a couple decades). Keep your head down, talk only about work with anyone from work, whether you're at work or not when the conversation happens. Keep that log in a protected, non-networked folder, and keep ALL email, and if possible, keep written transcripts of any IM type conversions you have with colleagues. Keeping those IM transcripts ha…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:54 AM
18

I hear you, loud and clear. The problem is that the women you work with want blood, and they don't care who it comes from. They get to be irrational and fabricate bullshit. That's just the nature of female privilege. You will likely be the target of false accusations, and find yourself in a meeting with HR before 2025 is over. The only thing you could have done to stop that from happening would have been to be a Kamala toady, or not say a single word at all about politics other than that you don…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 11:34 PM
86

Just keep your mouth shut about it all and begin keeping track of incidents where inappropriate political comments are made with date, time, words said, circumstances, and who said it. You're going to need that for the inevitable HR meeting.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:40 PM
8

There would be arrests...
/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:41 PM
39

This is only to take emphasis away from male cancer so that funding continues to be majority focused on female cancers...
/r/MensRights04/11/24 12:47 AM
33

Ah, yep. White knight frat boy syndrome. People wonder why men can't "unite" to have our voices be heard... guys like that are why. I will guarantee you that this guy told the story a dozen times throughout the night, bragging about how he "stood up for the women" and threatened you. Also, those women were wearing their revealing Halloween costumes in public precisely to attract the so-called "male gaze," though they want to reserve the right to punish anyone looking that they decide they don't …
/r/MensRights03/11/24 05:56 PM
64

Where was this? How old was the guy who threatened you? There's a thing with the 35 and under crowd that has them running around all the time looking for things to get offended about. Lots of wrongheaded men in this age bracket think that they should be the "enforcers" because they think this will get them laid, and if they're particularly aggressive types, they will go around looking for things to act offended about, then threaten those they feel are behaving in an offensive way to make themsel…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 05:17 PM
8

They'd quite like it if all the men whom they shunned as potential partners could just get together and allow themselves to be tax-fleeced, so that 'the state' could pick up the tab for female choices. I believe that this is going to be the most likely scenario going forward for countries to prop up birth rates. They won't wait for men to "get together and allow" it either... they'll just do it. Consider how often "elected" officials actually do what their constituents want... I believe that gov…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:35 PM
2

These things are, in general, what motivates most men. They work for their family, and their family defines them. 99% of the time, when a man is asked the question you asked, the person asking is interested in the answers he gave, and nothing else.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 06:54 PM
2

Heh, something very biological drives many of these men - they think that they will get laid more if they espouse these beliefs and actively openly support them. I could go on about it, and lots of mangina pussies would come running to this thread to talk about how my take is so bad and all of that other bullshit, but the reality is very clear if you look at it with an attempt to be objective. Hell, I sold out my bros now and then back in the day for pussy and many of my bros did the same to me …
/r/MensRights01/11/24 06:20 PM
2

The problem again is that there are not enough people who understand how ugly things have gotten, and they aren't united. If I were to guess, only about 1 guy in 10 even acknowledges the legitimacy of any sort of Men's Rights Advocacy. Contrast that to survey data which says that 2 guys in 5 call themselves "feminists". Women don't want to marry those male feminists because despite what hetero women say, they don't actually want to marry pussies. Again, I applaud your optimism in this regard, bu…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 05:51 PM
3

Thanks for the kind words. I appreciate that you actually gave what I said some thought. I admire your optimism. However, I think that things have gone too far around the bend and that dissenting views are too easily silenced. We have two generations that are soon going to be running things (Millennials and GenZ) who pretty much swallow everything the mainstream media and big tech shove down their throats willingly. We have a whole generation of educators who were educated in this false narrativ…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 05:09 PM
45

The only reason any of those cunts are even able to have this conversation is due to the efforts of men. FFS... talk about solipsism.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 04:10 PM
0

You realize you're engaging in the exact tactic that makes MRA so important, right? You're changing definitions and playing stupid games... the thing is, you're still full of shit.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 06:20 PM
5

The issue is political, not social. Feminism is part of the leftist platform that seeks (among other things) to destabilize the nuclear family. With that said, Men's Rights Advocacy is portrayed as the enemy of Feminism. In reality, it doesn't have to be that way - and I know what you're thinking, but just hear me out. The truth is that "Feminism" is not simply improving conditions for women in the name of equality - as they would have you believe. Instead, Feminism uses the destructive tools of…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 06:16 PM
2

First, the Red Pill is 8 years old now - it came out in 2016 - that's half an eternity in today's zeitgeist. Second, the "Red Pill" metaphor is about being aware of the world AS IT IS, and is associated with critical thinking, rationality, reason, etc. "Blue pill" is about reacting with emotion and irrationality, and simply believing what you're told, without applying any sort of critical thinking, and just accepting whatever the status quo while being blissfully oblivious to what's REALLY going…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 05:59 PM
1

They absolutely do.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 09:30 PM
3

Marriage, specifically, divorce is the REAL blue tax. Everything else is a pittance relative to that.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 07:30 PM
2

I believe that's true. It's like a lot of tax shelters.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 09:05 AM
2

Yeah, it is complex and expensive, and really only worth it if you have a LOT of money to store anonymously.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 07:35 PM
2

The types of accounts I'm talking about are with banks that keep their account holders' identities private, and do not recognize the authority of US legal requests for disclosure of such accounts. If you do not disclose the existence of such accounts upon a request for discovery, you are still in violation of the law, but the US legal system has no way of confirming that you own such an account because as noted above, those banks will keep your account holder status private. As a result, you are…
/r/MensRights26/10/24 05:24 PM
2

Basically, yes. Discovery does not always happen in a divorce scenario, but if the divorce is contested and the courts get involved in the division of assets, it almost surely will be asked for. In that case, if you disobey the request for information about accounts/assets/etc. you are in violation of the law, likely contempt of the court order, and a bunch of other shit... so basically, yeah, it's illegal to hide it once it's been asked for, and it's AWFULLY hard to do that with an "onshore" ac…
/r/MensRights26/10/24 05:08 PM
3

This would not be a legal way to keep money separate in the event of a divorce. You can do it, but during divorce proceedings, when there is a request for discovery of income and assets, if this is not disclosed, you run the risk of legal sanction, including incarceration.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 04:50 PM
2

Who is putting all women into the same basket? The discussion is about feminism. Are all women feminists?
/r/MensRights26/10/24 02:14 PM
3

Correct. Feminism is a leftist (Marxist) construct. Always has been, always will be.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 02:13 PM
1

Oh boy... Ayn Rand... you're going to draw some hate-fire from the lefty, Marxist, soy-boys running around here.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 02:08 PM
0

That's a very loose take on the definitions. In terms of social movements and such, equality is about equivalence of opportunity. Equity is about equivalence of outcome. I get that the entire leftist perspective is based on legally enforcing "equity" in the name of "equality", but the reality is that when you intentionally conflate equality and equity, your motives become clear.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 01:57 PM
3

Never negotiate with terrorists.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 01:24 PM
3

Is not all that weird for her to have made the story up out of whole cloth. Some women sit around and stew over this kind of thing for hours and hours, days, weeks, etc. It has been this way since before social media was even a thing. Some women would stew over rumors, perceived sleights, etc., manufacturing wildly delusional stories around the littlest thing or NOTHING at all. I can remember listening to my sister 40 years ago, talking with her other crazy tween and teen friends, making up wild…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 09:43 AM
34

Take your half out of the joint account ASAP. She will steal it if she hasn't yet. Make sure that you have proper paper trails on all that and the money you used from the sale of property. Basically, make sure you have all your ducks in a row and that all money is in accounts that your sister has no access to. Expect her to try to steal anything she has access to. After that, expect her to take you to probate court to contest the rest.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 03:46 PM
19

Well said. OP, pay attention to this post. The destruction of the nuclear family is the first step to the destruction of a culture in order to rewrite that culture into something else. It is a cornerstone of totalitarian and leftist political schemes. Also, it's a cornerstone of feminism... why do you think that is?
/r/MensRights20/10/24 03:36 AM
6

It's a foolish premise. She's gauging the "success" of "art" by what is "popular", which has EVERYTHING to do with zeitgeist. This is an age where women are being celebrated for simply existing. Women's "art" is revered as being "bold" and "empowered" and "brave" and blah blah blah blah, regardless of whether or not it actually is... It would be extremely interesting to present art made by a man, but tell everyone it was made by a woman, just to watch the art critic world fawn over it. Picasso m…
/r/MensRights16/10/24 02:42 PM
7

The point was to bring light to the fact that the UN celebrates "International Womens Day" for 8 days, without a single mention of any sort of "International Mens Day", while using men for the vast majority of the stuff it does, particularly the dangerous stuff. I.e. the UN organization itself, like much of the rest of the world, ignores the contributions (historically, and ongoing) of men to their mission.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 11:18 PM
13

Dr. Phil Lowcock - the jokes just write themselves. Fuck that guy.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 05:48 PM
8

Oh yeah, the UN with 7% women in their military peacekeeping forces and 16% women in their police units... out of over 80,000 people...
/r/MensRights14/10/24 04:28 PM
6

In the United States, a prisoner cannot legally consent to sex with a staff member due to the power imbalance. That would make this a case of rape committed by the CO. This story would be one for Pussypass if that sub still existed.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 01:30 PM
3

The reality that most people know, but are unwilling to admit is that often, the difference between a dubious (but treated as gospel) sexual harrassment complaint to HR and a nothingburger is whether or not the woman making the complaint finds the man who complimented her hair or outfit attractive. Source: a good female friend who has worked for decades in corporate HR.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 03:20 PM
1

This is not such a myth in the American South.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 01:31 PM
1

Haha, I understand.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 09:59 PM
2

Hmm....
/r/MensRights02/10/24 09:41 PM
5

Maybe I don't understand you here... are you lamenting that men are NOT sexualized enough and that this is misandry?
/r/MensRights02/10/24 01:46 PM
24

I think you might be overthinking this. Yes, I get it, female pop culture is much more comfortable overtly objectifying and sexualizing men than male pop culture is ALLOWED to OVERTLY objectify and sexualize women. The irony of all of that is that women are, by far, the largest "consumers" of plastic surgery which in general is intended to create a more aesthetically pleasing appearance for the purposes of objectification and sexualization... but that's on them.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 01:02 PM
11

Bullshit article full of every bullshit and disproven trope there ever was is bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 10:47 PM
17

Absolutely, this is at the heart of the matter.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 04:13 PM
6

I see... lots of interesting, very NOT US concepts all around that. Such as: Government owned media Inability to shut off service for non payment (probably because it's government owned and is somehow illegal to shut people off or something) Collecting payment as a tax, but not taking it from paychecks (I know not everyone gets a paycheck per se, though I don't know at all how UK taxes work) Anyway, it still seems stupid to put people in jail for it.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 03:37 PM
13

It seems weird that this is a criminal offense at all. In the US, this would be like going to jail for not paying the Netflix bill. With that said, decriminalizing it because it supposedly disproportionately impacts women (who don't pay their bills) is also absurd. Do they throw men in jail who don't pay child support? Would they want to decriminalize that, if there were more women not paying child support than men and thus women were thereby impacted disproportionately? In truth, I wouldn't be …
/r/MensRights29/09/24 02:37 PM
110

Odd how there's no sex offender registry... No nightstick shampoos from arresting officers... No actual incarceration...
/r/MensRights24/09/24 04:49 PM
18

She was probably already receiving child support from him. Family court in the US does this shit too - child support is separate from parental visitation. They order child support in a half second, flat, but need you to go through all manner of hoops to prove actual parentage in order to obtain a custody order, which is handled by a totally separate court. You also have to go through all manner of hoops if you're NOT the father to get out of paying child support for kids that aren't yours. The s…
/r/MensRights24/09/24 03:00 PM
24

I don't know what's more disgusting, the obviously false accusation, or the way the Kangaroo Court of USC's Diversity and Equity office behaved in the aftermath. The bias and arrogance of those scumbags is extremely telling. https://titleixforall.com/in-civil-suit-usc-reinstates-armann-premjee-following-recent-court-of-appeals-defeat/
/r/MensRights24/09/24 10:39 AM
1

Hate to tell you this, but this whole scene has been this way for almost 30 years at least. Like, since the Oprah and Dr. Phil days for sure. Example: Q: Why do men [do something bad]? A: because it is man's nature to be a jerk. Q: Why do women [do the same bad thing]? A: Because the men in their lives are jerks.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 12:46 AM
10

One thing to remember is that a lot of physical trauma therapies and practices evolved from wartime medicine - where millions of men were the "test subjects." A lot of these practices from the mid 20th century and even earlier still inform current physical trauma therapies. It should come as no surprise that in a lot of cases, specific physiological differences of women are not as thoroughly taken into account (or even understood) simply due to the fact that we didn't see 10 million women die of…
/r/MensRights19/09/24 12:27 AM
40

Just FYI, the Good Samaritan Law doesn't give you carte blanche everywhere. In some places, you will want to be sure you have an up to date CPR certification for example, before using it on someone, or else you could be open to criminal, not just civil issues. Make sure you know the laws in your state.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 03:31 AM
5

Heh, yeah, this sounds for all the world like a politically motivated bullshit false accusation hit piece. I guess what's good for the goose...
/r/MensRights13/09/24 10:22 PM
7

Yeah but that means they'll only sentence the father for longer... /s
/r/MensRights12/09/24 10:35 PM
132

Who knew that making a grossly lopsided law, and financially incentivizing being a "victim" would lead to such things? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p01ir2/the_epidemic_of_false_accusations_in_spain/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjgBfklmYj8 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p01ir2/comment/h83okru/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights12/09/24 09:25 PM
122

Per the article: Hailey Clifton-Carmack, 26, pleaded guilty on Friday to sexual contact with a student in exchange for having the other charges including statutory rape, child molestation and child endangerment dropped, reported KRCG. She faces up to four years in prison and will be on house arrest until she is sentenced on October 11. AND: The teen's father, Mark Creighton, is accused of knowing about the relationship but failing to report it and has been charged with endangering the welfare of…
/r/MensRights12/09/24 09:15 PM
39

Heh, what a disgrace. That counselor AND her boss should have their licenses stripped and be immediately fired. UDM should be sued into the ground.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 05:33 PM
3

So if this is happening repeatedly, and the person subject to the PI is not at a place like the person holding the PI's workplace, or something like that, your buddy should start documenting this stuff and building his case for getting the PI lifted. Your buddy should see an attorney and get advice on how to proceed. It's pretty difficult to convince a judge that you're still scared that a person will do you harm (which is why you have a PI against them) if you keep following them around. PIs ar…
/r/MensRights11/09/24 06:02 PM
12

So, if anyone is unclear about what the term "kangaroo court" means, the description in the OP is a pretty accurate start.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 12:17 AM
1

I understand. One thing to consider is that the right is at least not pushing DEI, and in fact, is looking to scale it back, if not dismantle it. And make no mistake, if you're a guy, whether you're a minority, gay, trans, whatever, DEI is not your friend. Admittedly, the right allows some shit practices that negatively impact trans folks, and that does not sit well with me at all. However, the left is actively looking to do me more harm than the right is. I'm just an average middle-class white …
/r/MensRights07/09/24 01:43 AM
0

The left proving their foolishness by their carte blanche adoption of the philosophy of "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." Are people who throw their lot in with such morons really worth speaking to or listening to?
/r/MensRights06/09/24 05:55 PM
-3

Feminists are fighting for Palestine freedom. This, right here. Only cowards are downvoting this remark.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 09:35 AM
1

This is all nonsensical garbage. DEI initiatives will not only take care of getting women into engineering jobs (regardless of actual qualification), and CERTAINLY DEI initiatives will take care of getting those women in engineering jobs into "leadership" positions - again regardless of qualification.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 02:28 AM
7

All of this is moot when you consider that nearly 1 suicide in 4 is a woman! /s
/r/MensRights31/08/24 06:04 AM
8

If you still have the link to the article, I would appreciate you sending it to me via DM.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 09:07 AM
5

With regard to this premise: "Modern feminism was created to destroy the nuclear family and further divide men & women", the short answer for me is: Yes, sort of true. Feminism is a leftist/socialist movement, and the nuclear family is anathema to leftists/Marxists/Communists/Socialists. While it may not have been created with the express purpose of abolishing/dissolving the nuclear family, that is a part of the rubric of Communism/Socialism which created Feminism. The longer answer is that femi…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 05:05 PM
1

The basic idea I think you're falling for comes from Talcott Parsons who had a theory that the industrial revolution gave rise to the "Nuclear Family" - in particular, the Second Industrial Revolution which started around 1860 and lasted into the early 20th century. I have seen nothing with any sort of basis in observable fact or widely regarded writing that feminism was responsible for this. Perhaps (and this is only a guess by me) that if Feminists in fact claim to have developed the Nuclear f…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:51 PM
2

I guess... if you can call disagreement with historical fact a "disagreement" rather than denial. https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-real-roots-of-the-nuclear-family/
/r/MensRights28/08/24 02:35 PM
2

This is not true. The nuclear family has been a Western standard since at least the 14th century.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 02:01 PM
32

Just report them - every time you see them, report them for "hate" or whatever other TOS violation there is relating to that. Take screenshots of what you're reporting them for, and if the person doesn't get sanctioned, then keep reporting them, but keep your screenshots. Take screenshots of any communication from the platform management about your report. Alternatively, just block those people and/or vacate the platform - vote with your patronage. As for more men needing to be aware of it, I be…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 12:51 AM
2

During the height of the whole BLM/George Floyd thing a few years ago, there was a case of a white woman who went hiking or camping or something like that and wound up missing. There was HUGE media coverage of it and the story was on the lips of what felt like everyone. At some point during that scenario, a black woman activist made the statement that the media (and presumably the nation) only cares about white women. Of course she was met with a lot of disdain and criticism and condemnation out…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 05:04 PM
35

On a per capita basis, men who are owed child support collect a smaller fraction of what is owed them by their ex-wives than women collect from their ex-husbands. I'd be curious about the incarceration rate of delinquent mothers vs. father, as well as the relative willingness of family courts to adjust payments for women vs. men.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 10:40 PM
8

I wonder if the policy includes supporting those boys and men when it is determined that the perpetrators of that domestic violence they are victims of are women. I'll believe it when I see it.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 05:52 AM
0

They're doing that in the US, bub?
/r/MensRights23/08/24 05:34 AM
-1

Glad to see you guys are all focused on the issues...
/r/MensRights23/08/24 04:22 AM
2

Oh lawdy... such a clever little straw man you are... bruh... Put a tent on this circus, you clown.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 03:59 AM
3

It's horseshit intended to garner support from people who don't yet realize that such measures would cripple them even more.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 03:04 AM
1

What's your point? What sort of moral high ground do you think there is when everyone is broke as shit?
/r/MensRights23/08/24 03:01 AM
0

Identity politics is the primary tool of leftists.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 02:59 AM
7

https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2022/09/why-we-should-abolish-the-family I've been saying this for years: Leftist policy calls for the dissolution of the nuclear family. Feminism is a leftist movement.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 02:27 AM
2

GTFO
/r/MensRights23/08/24 02:23 AM
4

Honestly, remarks like that are beneath consideration by anyone with enough brain cells to walk and chew gum at the same time. They think if they keep repeating this nonsensical horseshit, it will become true, or at least maybe people will believe it.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 02:23 AM
5

Do you remember what your wallet looked like before this administration? I do. The business of America is business.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 01:06 AM
9

The funny thing is that the men I know who don't support Harris don't dislike her because she's a woman. They dislike her purely on her own merits that have nothing to do with her sex. Remember, gentlemen, the democrats are about cultural and ideological division, and four more years of them will not just be four more years of global economic devastation, it will be four more years of an agenda that prioritizes the disenfranchisement of men under the false auspices of feminism. It's a false dich…
/r/MensRights22/08/24 11:45 PM
5

Thanks, man. I've done some humble work in my life. I presently work in a corporate environment in a middle managerial role, so I am relatively fortunate. I'm not embarrassed about that janitorial work at all. I have a real appreciation for it and the people who do it. And frankly, it was kind of fun trying to see how efficiently I could do it. I suspect I might have loathed it if I were looking at that work as my whole future, but I was only there, weathering out some tough economic times. The …
/r/MensRights21/08/24 10:07 PM
17

Heh, I was a janitor at a college. I managed a 3 story building which was used for art classes - everything from painting to sculpture. There were massive restrooms for both men and women on each floor. There were classrooms which would be left in disastrous states. I cleaned all the restrooms every day, including disinfecting all toilets, surfaces, floors, sinks, and mirrors. I dry mopped all hard floor surfaces daily, and wet mopped each floor every third day (first floor on Monday, second flo…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 12:54 PM
1

This thread is a shameful indication of how we as a society have allowed the wilful and intentional destruction of young boy's and men's self-esteem. I know some of you will get pissy about this next remark of mine, but I'll assume you're also suffering from the same brainwashing: Read some Jordan Peterson. Start with 12 Rules For Life.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 08:51 AM
65

Here's a simple way to play the Uno Reverse card on those women who insist on 6' or taller. Insist that they be 125 lbs or lighter. 14.5% of men are 6' or taller. ~14% of women are 125 lbs or lighter* * technically it's something like 126.2 at 14%, so you can be generous and ask for them to be 130 or less, though be advised that your generosity will not be reciprocated from women.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 04:00 PM
31

Don't pay attention to what women SAY. Pay attention to what women DO. Women SAY they don't need a man to provide for them. Women DO marry men they expect to provide for them.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 01:49 PM
1

BS grandstanding and virtue signaling. As I always say, do not pay attention to what women SAY, pay attention to what they DO.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 09:12 PM
6

Guarantee this was not the first kid she did this with. Everyone from the prosecutors to the judge knew this despite not having any evidence of others presented at the trial. This is surely why she got the max sentence.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 12:30 PM
199

It's typical double standard, sloppy thinking. Stereotyping and generalizing is NOT OK, unless it's about men... Ignore it and ignore anyone who uses this kind of language or thinking.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 08:00 PM
35

I'm not saying that strippers are "lesser" people, or in some way immoral or whatever, but a stripper has ZERO room to complain about being sexualized, fetishized, or experiencing the "male gaze". Their income LITERALLY is derived from the male gaze and whether or not they do a good job of getting those men to sexualize and fetishize them. Further, making comparisons to a flight attendant is utterly ridiculous. The difference between a flight attendant smiling at me and a stripper smiling at me …
/r/MensRights09/08/24 07:31 PM
3

Setting aside the obvious bullshit from the M2F trans liar, it's amazing to imagine how 12 people (almost surely all or nearly all women) would lie about something so obviously preposterously impossible. Just imagine how easily how many MORE would lie about something that is less objectively provably preposterous... like bearing witness to abuse that never happened in your run-of-the-mill SA/DV railroad deal.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 03:51 PM
40

It's called monkey branching.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 03:59 PM
3

Look, first of all, I advise you to simply steer clear of such subreddits. They are cesspool rage bait nonsense. Secondly, use the nature of such subreddits to help you with your dating and friend seleciton process. Example: You: Hey, good to meet you Susie, you mentioned a meme you saw on reddit in one of our text conversations, do you hang around there a lot? Susie: Hey Seekkae, yeah, I love reddit. I probably spend an hour or two a night there. You: Oh wow, nice! What subs do you frequent? Su…
/r/MensRights31/07/24 01:26 PM
27

Heh, move along folks, nothing to see here... business as usual.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 08:23 PM
1

I should have added, "In recent years," despite greater coverage of the frequency of false allegations in a post pound-me-too world.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 02:00 PM
1

Such "courts" are almost surely the source of those statistics.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 01:34 PM
4

The importance of this guide is that it puts some data behind the circumstances under which women tend to make false accusations.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 11:59 PM
66

Title IX is as big of a Trojan Horse as the Interstate Commerce Clause of The Constitution.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 02:02 AM
3

I'm going to speak in aggregates here, not hard and fast rules that apply to every single person. Generally speaking, women looking at LTRs are interested in a man's future, and men looking at LTRs tend to be interested in a woman's past. Men with a future are in general, the most desirable to women, and if they have a future, those men generally are intelligent enough to realize that all the efforts that they put into their future can be wiped out by marriage. With ALL of that said though, ther…
/r/MensRights25/07/24 09:01 PM
3

It was my understanding that with regard to private insurers, that bill was going to protect those insurers who covered IVF from benighted state laws which took anti-abortion stances making the handling of embryos legally hazardous. I was objecting to the increased taxpayer costs for the coverage of IVF by medicaid, which, as you note, covers about 1 in 5 Americans. However, medicaid is the largest single payer for maternity care and births in the US, with 41-42% of all births paid for by medica…
/r/MensRights25/07/24 08:51 PM
5

She didn't specifically mention single women, but she did give Vance shit about voting against taxpayer funded IVF. My entire post is NOT predicated on single women using IVF, it is predicated on my objection to men paying the majority of the tax burden for it if it were to become universally available through taxpayer funding. My post is ACTUALLY predicated on the crisis of the reduced birth rates in the recent 10-15 years. My post also addresses the trends for BOTH men and women to avoid marri…
/r/MensRights25/07/24 07:28 PM
10

I don't think that single women ARE the ones using IVF. I think that if IVF were universally available, that single women WOULD use it considerably more often than they do. This was kind of exactly what Jennifer Aniston was arguing for, though admittedly, it was an unrealistic argument because most single women (or single men) do not have the kind of wealth that Aniston does, or even the kind of wealth to make raising a child on their income alone a financially attractive option. I also don't un…
/r/MensRights25/07/24 06:54 PM
5

I deleted that post because it was largely a repeat of an earlier post of mine in this thread and the person to whom I was replying deleted their post after I made it. If I recall correctly, I think I might have said something about the legitimacy of the reasons that both men AND women were avoiding marriage... I'll sum up with some very general thoughts. Basically they boil down to: For men, marriage presents a very high risk to future financial stability, mental peace, and overall happiness fo…
/r/MensRights25/07/24 06:01 PM
3

Post deleted because it no longer makes sense after the person I was responding to deleted their post.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 04:09 PM
21

Let's ignore the whining about the use of the "childless cat lady" trope. We all know that both sides are perfectly comfortable with their tropes for each other and are also perfectly comfortable attempting to crybully about it. The real issue here is the funding of IVF with taxpayer dollars and the fact that JD Vance voted against it. I have said here on this sub before that ultimately, as marriage and birth rates drop, the State will begin to simply extract wealth and resources from males, by …
/r/MensRights25/07/24 03:19 PM
3

Title IV-D does not cover alimony unless the alimony is included with an order of child support. In other words, the state doesn't get federal kickbacks for alimony alone like it does for child support.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:36 PM
1

I hope you're paying attention.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 03:13 PM
3

Came here to post this.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 10:50 AM
6

Fair enough. Reddit only begrudgingly accepts the presence of this sub. It should come as no surprise to you that Reddit would not include anything of that nature about Trump. I would caution you about viewing the world as if Reddit is an accurate summation of what the world is talking about it concerned about. Reddit, in general, is a tiny window showing only the ultra-left thoughts of mostly young, idealistic, uninformed sheep. From the MRA perspective, gauging anything based on Reddit provide…
/r/MensRights18/07/24 05:22 PM
15

The fact that you made this post tells me a great deal about the sources of the media you consume.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 04:40 PM
23

Trump called her, and indicated that he would be speaking to her again in the coming days and weeks.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 04:39 PM
47

Heh, that case is the latest disgusting example of why New York is a festering shithole. The Daniel Penny case is a goldmine for the Unamerican, racist traitors of that city.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 06:18 PM
48

It's almost as if actions have consequences...
/r/MensRights17/07/24 06:07 PM
-6

In all honesty, I love seeing tittays "in the wild" so to speak, and I don't give a fuck if someone thinks I'm objectifying them for looking and/or not having an issue with barechested women. Not everything has an opposite gender equivalent, and I'm ok with that.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 09:51 PM
6

Heh, just remember in the dating world, unless it's some sort of sport-fucking situation: Women are concerned about a man's future. Men need to be concerned about a woman's past.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 09:29 PM
5

Amen, sister!
/r/MensRights12/07/24 01:06 PM
5

I wish it were that simple. You can't discount the zeitgeist here. Unless the man making the claim has meticulously documented everything that has happened and has witnesses willing to corroborate at least some of it, HR will flip it on a man making such complaints. The irony is not lost on me that this is what used to happen when women in the workplace faced these issues. However, that doesn't make it any more likely that a lawsuit from a man would be successful. I am hopeful that this could be…
/r/MensRights12/07/24 01:03 PM
2

also in 2 years you cannot go from obese to any kind of an impressive physique, as a natural you couldn't do that even if you started out skinny It's unclear what you mean by "impressive physique", but I am 6'3" tall and when I was in my mid 40s, I went from 300 lbs to 218 in 8 months doing weight watchers and playing recreational tennis. I live in Georgia and every neighborhood has tennis courts and you can play year round. I was on the courts about 20 hours a week, either practicing or playing…
/r/MensRights12/07/24 12:55 PM
16

HR does not protect the employees. HR protects the company.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 12:44 PM
5

DEI is a destructive force and is part of the war on "Merit". https://www.realcleareducation.com/articles/2023/02/10/the_equity_delusionand_its_marxist_roots_110821.html
/r/MensRights11/07/24 07:24 PM
10

The issue will only get worse as fewer and fewer males make it into college and subsequently into medicine and there are fewer and fewer male caregivers in medicine.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 10:14 PM
6

Bro... this is from December 2019...
/r/MensRights08/07/24 10:09 PM
1

Hypergamy is a thing...
/r/MensRights08/07/24 07:51 PM
7

The hilarity is that this person assumes that their own judgment on the quality of a man is universal. In other solipsistic news, I think it's important at this time that we recognize that nearly 1 in 5 suicides is a female.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 04:45 PM
2

It depends... is the father listed on the birth certificate? Was the father married to the mother at the time of the birth? Did the father sign away his parental rights? Like I said, it's somewhat complex, and the answers and challenges faced by the father will vary state to state. Generally speaking, though, if the father has not signed away his parental rights, or had them stripped by the state, and assuming he has the money to hire lawyers to press the family courts to acknowledge he even has…
/r/MensRights08/07/24 04:47 AM
3

It's impossible to answer your question without more info. There's a lot of complexity around that question that could easily be answered if things like DNA testing were more common, but often there are other complexities around that involving tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees to get courts to pay attention to something more than their Title IV-D kickbacks.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 06:56 PM
10

Hey OP, there is "the law," and then there is the way the law is applied and enforced. The law will tell you that everything is equitable and fair and that joint custody is the preferred outcome. However, the law also includes fine print, which includes the concept of "at the court's discretion" and family court in particular also includes the tacit axiom "no matter what nonsense the female says, believe her." In addition, the law also includes some not-so-fine print called Title IV-D of the Soc…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 01:33 PM
11

The guy has a bunch of short vids about his dog, and another short video explaining why YT won't monetize him... I guess he's desperate for IG exposure?
/r/MensRights14/05/24 09:54 PM
19

It was my understanding that in the US, as long as you do sperm donation through legit recognized businesses/medical practitioners, you can not be saddled with child support. Is this in the US? What was the loophole? If this is true, on the face of it, sperm donation will pretty much cease to be a thing. **EDIT** There is an update video where the guy says that he's lawyered up and the lawyer feels pretty confident that this will get thrown out and the guy will get paid back the thousands in chi…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:16 PM
4

You have Title IV-D of the Social Security Act to blame for the usurious nature of the child support system. Technically, under the law, child support calculations themselves are not gender based, however they ARE based on custody percentage, and the determination of that custody percentage is ABSOLUTELY gender based. Further, the way child support is calculated based on the income of the payor is a farce. The justifications and "costs" of raising a child are often grossly exaggerated. Some anec…
/r/MensRights13/05/24 04:50 PM
10

Woman math...
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:29 PM
2

The short answer is "hypergamy". The longer answer is "current day feminist ideology". Current day feminist ideology is that a woman should only involve herself for anything other than a casual sexual fling with a man who can provide resources (money) for her, that will make her life easier. Further, that ideology teaches women that they are only responsible for themselves (and not even reallly that) in a relationship, and that they should NOT be held accountable to keep the house their husband …
/r/MensRights14/02/24 04:43 PM
4

There is money to be made from circumcision. Predominantly, this money is generated in the cosmetic industry, making women's facial creams - yeah, the dark jokes seem to write themselves, don't they? As a result, the disinformation campaign is constantly firing on all cylinders around "the benefits" of performing circumcision. It will take legitimate, focused, legislative effort here in the west to get the healthcare industry to stop lying to people about it and to get the procedure relegated to…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 02:45 PM
1

Do you think that if you had a son with the identical preparation and credentials, he'd have received the same benefits and recommendations and scholarships and so forth? I don't actually want you to answer that, I just want you to think about it.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 11:07 PM
1

Because those are such strong indicators of a student's preparedness for the rigors (which I know is itself a laugh) of post secondary academics that can't be gleaned through GPA and SAT/ACT scores - especially for STEM degrees.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 09:20 PM
4

Of course, it's "subjective", that's the rub, right? That doesn't mean you can't prove or disprove biases though, and hiding them behind some sort of "equity" word salad nonsense has become SOP these days. A good way to tell if the scholarship award process (or even a college admissions process) is looking to be legitimately free of bias is if they anonymize the applications by removing names/addresses from them and removing any/all references to the sex or race of the applicant.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 10:46 PM
7

I would be curious how many of those scholarships are not listed expressly as sex-specific, but are, in practice, handed out with fairly strong bias towards women.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 08:11 PM
8

Bruh, if getting your GED is enough of a hurdle for you to mention it, I am finding it difficult to imagine you being well prepared for college.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 08:10 PM
6

Unrelated to the question of systemic misandry, the biggest problem with this argument of "systemic misogyny" is the problem of enforcing misandrist policies in countries that do not practice systemic misogyny because some OTHER country DOES practice misogynist practices. E.g. Why is it necessary to punish western men because men in some 3rd world nation treat women badly? The premise of the entire discussion is moot and beneath consideration. Misogynistic and misandrist policies exist everywher…
/r/MensRights17/01/24 06:12 PM
5

Good luck with the first three options there. The reason this is such a difficult scenario is that the required considerations for either of these to work are already corrupted and stacked against you. Option 1: Appeal to authority. Requires: fair leaders and established "innocent till proven guilty" principle. We know this isn't the case, and probably has never been in any widespread way throughout all of recorded history. ​ Option 2: Counter-narrative: Requires: consistent, truthful communicat…
/r/MensRights17/01/24 06:04 PM
4

OK so, the first thing your brother needs to do is discuss this with an attorney. Perhaps the family can fund this as a loan or something so that the significant other (SO) won't be privvy to the cash outlay. If an attorney is somehow out of the question (it WILL be expensive), then I'd suggest the following: Have your brother begin a "journal" in which he documents EVERY interaction with SO - particularly the contentious ones, with date and time and what was said, including exact words when SO …
/r/MensRights17/01/24 05:04 PM
4

I saw this thread as well... I was tempted to post a question to the OP and to the rest of the people in the thread about what they'd think if the sexes of the people in the story were reversed... we all know that would have been downvoated to oblivion because we all know that Reddit's court of public opinion would have lambasted a male OP of such a story... but I digress... If you have significant assets prior to a marriage, it can be worthwhile to protect them with trusts and prenuptial agreem…
/r/MensRights06/10/23 05:45 PM
5

Heh, amazing.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 12:58 AM
1

Treat them like the terrorists they are, and simply don't deal with them. That's what I do.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 02:05 PM
4

Heh, there are mental health issues here, legitimate ones, like "I stopped taking my lithium" type of issues.... She did hit all the buzz words and dog whistles for female entitlement though. My guess is that Ms. magazine will be honoring her as "woman of the year" for this important and brave response to patriarchial oppression. She's the 21st century's Rosa Parks!!!
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:14 PM
1

So there is a sometimes fine line between "controlling" behavior and "loving" behavior. If you REALLY don't want to be accountable to anyone, then, as an adult, you can make those choices, but usually we trade that accountability for the companionship of the relationship, which is very natural and normal. It's up to the individual to determine how much they will tolerate their partner forbidding them to do a thing, or getting mad at them for doing it - but if that thing your wife is forbidding y…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:01 PM
5

The application of the term "objectification" is almost completely subjective. For many women, the threshhold for acknowledging that they are being objectified (let alone being offended by it) has a lot to do with two main factors: How attracted they are to the person "objectifying" them and... What they stand to gain by being "objectified". Certainly not ALL women are like this, but a fair number are, and often the most vocal complainers about it are the ones who experience it the least. Furthe…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 04:09 PM
9

If she is doing this on the sly without the man being aware, it is despicable. The only way I would say it's OK is if the man is well aware that his future wife is not attracted to him, and is only marrying him because of promised financial support - at this point, that's basically prostitution and the ultimate transactional relationship. Would people think it so wrong if the man had the woman agree that he would support her with X dollars per month, in exchange for X amount of sex, and Y number…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:40 PM
2

It needs to be safe in both directions. Men need to be just as protected from assault as they need to be from false allegations.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 02:50 AM
7

I'd be curious to know which gender participates the most in the "cancelling" of people as part of cancel culture. We already know that women use social media more than men do, and the only reason the gap is as narrow as it is has to do with them including forums like Reddit as "social media" where men are the majority of users. The majority of cancel culture (where it really matters) does not occur on forums, but on the social media platforms which women tend to be the large majority of users.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 08:26 PM
75

If you want to learn how to catch a fish, who do you ask? a) the fish b) someone who catches a lot of fish
/r/MensRights13/09/23 07:22 PM
1

You bet it will! Also, good for you! Please do not feel like I'm giving you personally or Gen Z any shit over these trends I believe I'm seeing. I fully expect the generation AFTER Gen Z will have to have government intervention in the west (North America, Western Europe) and possibly in China and Japan with regard to population decline or the global economy might collapse. I'm not talking about the Handmaid's Tale, but rather the Poolboy's Tale (for lack of a more creative way to say that it wi…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 07:17 PM
3

You're also going to see a lot more female breadwinners in Gen Z (relative to other generations), which I suspect might have some impacts as well.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 06:31 PM
0

I think it's definitely good... and I think it sucks that men leave sick wives. I'm older now, approaching 54, but would be interested to see what happens in the next 20 years or so with these statistics as the younger millennial and zoomer generations begin to get old enough that these things start happening to them.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 06:11 PM
5

I was speaking about whether or not it was true that us healthcare workers receive this training that is intended to be used for women when their husbands leave.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 06:00 PM
5

What exactly don't you understand?
/r/MensRights13/09/23 05:52 PM
7

My guess is that if this is true, it's because nobody thinks that men need any help with softening the blow when it happens to them - because it sure as shit does happen to them.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:51 PM
2

I would suspect that the only reason it might look in some studies, like husbands leave sick wives more often than wives leave sick husbands, is that women give other reasons for leaving like "he was abusive and controlling", "our relationship had run its course, and he'd been distant with me for years already", and so forth... Further, women are potentially more likely to stick around officially, and not file for divorce (even if they've checked out emotionally/physically) if there is something…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:49 PM
7

I'm sorry this happened to you, bud, it sucks. Your sister is a breathtakingly ignorant cunt, and you should tell her so - in those words, right before you block her phone and block her on any social media and go full non-contact with her. You don't need her in your life as you continue to wrestle with this very serious issue. My wife is a mental health counselor and one of her biggest pieces of advice to clients is as follows (somewhat, but not heavily paraphrased): "If the people in your life …
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:32 PM
1

Arguing with a feminist is like the Special Olympics; no matter who wins, you're both retarded.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 09:37 PM
0

Most states are "no fault" which means that technically, they do not consider things like adultery when division of marital assets is done... however, in actual practice, things are different. When the wife is the adulterer, the courts play their "no fault" card exactly as they should, and do not factor it into the division of marital assets. When the man is the breadwinner and is the adulterer, you should bet that any discretionary amounts of awards will be at the maximum and favoring the wife.…
/r/MensRights30/08/23 08:46 PM
20

Here's the bottom line on undergraduate teaching in the US: It's not a field that males are pushed towards during primary and high school. Entry into the field is beset by all female gatekeepers. Wages in the field are kind of crappy though benefits besides salary are excellent, and there aren't a ton of women out there looking to marry a guy who has a promising career as a kindergarten teacher. A male in a teaching position will have to be 10 times more "cautious" and on guard for untoward alle…
/r/MensRights30/08/23 07:52 PM
1

Tell me your survey questions are biased, leading, and designed to result in a specific conclusion without telling me your survey questions are biased and leading.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 11:49 PM
3

So it's important to understand the difference between divorce law and child support issues. Whether or not you're married to the mother of your children, the state will still look for someone to fleece for child support. States that do recognize common law marriages treat them no differently than registered marriages with regard to divorce law. If there is no domestic partnership/common law/traditional marriage, you'll have even LESS standing with regard to your parental rights over your childr…
/r/MensRights24/08/23 05:11 PM
1

So, the number of players definitely has a bearing on it, though, as the article states, the gap that is seen is greater than what would be expected (if skill/rating distribution were random). The assumption of "random" skill distribution is problematic for this because we know that becoming a top chess player involves a great deal of effort, not simply "natural" ability. Everything from coaching, to providing the time for study, to support networks will play into making a truly great chess play…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 04:00 PM
1

I thnk your bias is showing. I never stated that a man should be free to hire sex workers on extended stays away from his wife/family while the wife must sit at home, unfulfilled, loyal, etc. I would consider that to be as grievous a breach of commitment by the man as I would consider the reverse by a woman. Further, I never posited that people are "things". My entire argument assumes people have individual agency (which, philosophically precludes them from being "things" and makes them at the v…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 04:14 AM
1

Your argument (intentionally, I presume) avoids the idea of quid pro quo. If a man is to be viewed as a traditional provider and protector, then the woman must be devoted to him and loyal to him, and deferential to him, that's the tradeoff. It's OK if you or others don't like that, it's not everyone's cup of tea, but, you can't talk about the "benefits" of being a traditional male, while ignoring the liabilities, and likewise, you don't get to have all the benefits of being a traditional female …
/r/MensRights18/08/23 03:13 AM
1

Indeed! While what YOU want in life may be in line with that I want in life or others, especially here on this sub, want in life, it's not necessarily everyone's cup of tea. With that said, I believe that the family unit that YOU are speaking about is the reason that humanity has become the dominant species on this planet. If we want to legitimately discuss alternatives, we have to look into changing the evolutionary aspects of human gestation, and that takes not generations, not centures, not m…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 03:06 AM
3

Well we've seen in Scandinavian countries (widely considered to be the most socially "equitable" with regard to males or females picking whatever sorts of vocations they like), women, when they are MOST free from social pressures, tend to pick traditionally female dominated vocations at an even greater rate than in populations deemed to be less free from social pressure. In other words, the data from the Scandinavian countries are showing us that in an environment where people are the closest th…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:45 PM
1

I don't disagree... there is no evidence that I'm aware of, of any biologically based differences in male and female chess ability. The answer could very well lie in socialization issues. Globally, women make up about 10% of chess players, in the US it's closer to 8%. I do know that in the chess "ranking" system, females are given the "womens" version of titles like "Grand Master" with a lower bar of achievement required. 2500 rating for a Grand Master (GM) title, which can be a man or a woman, …
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:13 PM
1

Men what what they want (assuming consenting adults) as individuals, and as individuals, have every right to want whatever they want. Men deserve to make choices about their relationships based on what they want, what they can get, and how willing they are to wait or keep looking until they find what they want or can tolerate. NOBODY has the right to tell men that they can't have whatever preference they have (again, assuming consenting adults), period.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:23 PM
3

It's unclear what is REALLY going on, but top female chess players tend to perform worse against top male chess players than they do against other top female chess players. Any discussion of what might be the cause (except for some perceived threat/stress response from the women) would almost surely be met with vitriol and cancellation of the author. https://theconversation.com/whats-behind-the-gender-imbalance-in-top-level-chess-150637#:~:text=Female%20players%20tend%20to%20perform,move%20in%20…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 06:55 PM
14

Sounds like this woman was a set-up by a jealous competitor at work...
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:49 PM
1

Get a lawyer. It's unlikely there will be much she can do to attack your personal assets after only a year of marriage, but you should have a lawyer advise you. The only advice you should take seriously from this subreddit or any other here is that you should get a lawyer yourself.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:03 PM
4

We've been told for our own protection to never be alone in a room with a female at work. It's interesting to me to imagine women finding out that they're the ones that are considered the "danger zone" in the work place due to their toxic behavior. I am sure that this will never come to pass, but it's a fun thinkpiece.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 04:58 PM
2

I'm not sure that with the OP deleted from that linked post that it's the best example of a hill to die on. If you want to know how much being a SAHParent is "good for the gander", there are plenty of statistics to look into about it. The short answer is that it's not. I think fewer than 5% of stay at home parents are fathers, and I'd bet that fewer than half of that 5% are more than just barely tolerated by their wives.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 11:25 PM
2

When a feminist tells a man to "man-up", what they mean is "shut up and just keep on taking it".
/r/MensRights15/08/23 10:56 PM
20

There's nothing to suggest it's real either. The story itself is outlandish. The circumstances of the girl telling it are dubious.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 01:19 PM
35

Years ago, I was on match (i know that this gives you an idea of how long ago this was) before I met (at a friend's wedding) the woman who would become my wife. I probably had a half dozen first dates until I had a lunch date with this woman who I didn't match up with, but she was very kind and sweet, warned me that there were a lot of women just going out on dates to get a free meal. Imo, the first date should be conversation focused and low cost: coffee, a sandwich, etc. Then, if you pay, it's…
/r/MensRights12/08/23 04:20 PM
13

How important is this job to you? I ask because what you're experiencing is DEFINITELY sexual harrassment, but if you report it, she is HUGELY likely to play the Uno reverse card on you with management, and will likely be more believed than you will be. If she doesn't do that for some reason, she is also not likely to be fired, but she will spend the rest of the time you work there working on getting you fired, which she almost surely will be able to do successfully. Good luck.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 10:41 PM
4

Heh... the fucking guy is very Mussolini-esque.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 08:41 PM
3

Is that auto insurance completely private or is it in some way or portion subsidized/funded by the government?
/r/MensRights09/08/23 07:46 PM
18

That woman was going to keep on doing whatever she could to Karen that guy out of her way. No government employee is going to say shit to her either, at least not in Führer Trudeau's government. As for the rest, it's interesting to me to see that the DMV in Canada runs with about the same level of bullshit fuckery as it does in the US.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 07:28 PM
2

It is not justice if any man in the UK ever got convicted of statutory rape (or whatever they might call the analogous offense in the UK) while claiming to be unaware that the female he screwed was only 14 instead of 16. I believe the age of consent in the UK is 16, and I don't know what it looks like for men in the UK trying to use the "I thought she was legal!" defense in statutory rape cases, but I'm guessing it works about as well as it does in the US. We can pick apart the details of the ca…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 07:21 PM
5

You can fool some of the people all of the time, and you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 06:19 PM
25

You added a bunch of detail to this post since I made my first post, so I'm replying again. You may note that in my previous post I stated that lying about body count is shady. Just to let you know, most men assume most women are lying about body count and there used to be a rule that you should just double whatever number a woman tells you her body count is and make any decisions you want to make based on that doubled number... this was a concept spoken about 30 years ago when I was in my 20s. …
/r/MensRights09/08/23 02:58 PM
32

As for paternity testing, I think it's reasonable under any circumstances to have it done, but that's because paternity fraud occurs about 13% of the time globally. ​ As for questions about body count, this is up to the individual. A person has no more right to body count/sexual history information about another than what the person is willing to share. HOWEVER, if a person gets into a realationship with the other, certian questions may come out and then it's up to the partners to decide how to …
/r/MensRights09/08/23 01:41 PM
266

She'll make a killing ripping off her female clients, who will never second guess her at all.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:25 PM
8

Heh, fair enough. But again, I could have said [insert super hot person here] as the female target and would the point still have been made?
/r/MensRights04/08/23 08:35 PM
49

That's fair, and I considered doing so, but I don't even know who would be considered hot these days and figured people would nitpick my selection. The point is still there.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 04:16 PM
589

Heh... Try telling your GF sometime: "I just saw that neighbor woman sunbathing on the way past her house - you know the one that wears the thong and has the big boobs that you think dresses like a slut? Yeah her... I'm so horny right now... let's fuck!"
/r/MensRights04/08/23 02:16 PM
-8

Men learn to love the women they're attracted to. Women become attracted to the men they love. Seriously though, so what? At that point, the women are chasing you - so you can have your fun sportf*cking for a while - or not, and in the meanwhile, your ability to get dates/meet women is increased dramatically from when you were not one of the top 5% most physically attractive dudes in your 20s. You have access to more valuable women, and can pick and choose until you find the one that checks your…
/r/MensRights04/08/23 01:29 PM
13

The reality is that no matter what EVER happens or whatever women and/or feminists SAY, heterosexual women will ALWAYS have the option to forego a career and find a man who will make them a SAHM. At the very least, women can choose not to be the breadwinners and do a job they like or which pays lower with little pressure. Men (in all but a very few, rare cases) are valued by women for their ability to provide resources for that woman, full stop.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 01:19 PM
15

If you spend your time chasing women, you will waste valuable time and may never be wealthy or successful. If you spend your time chasing wealth and success, there will come a time when the women come to you.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 01:05 PM
23

For those who haven't read the article (it's evident in your comments), here's the scoop: Wife is a "go-getter" and gets much satisfaction from her work. She earns more than her husband by a fair amount and covers 2/3rds of the household expenses. She travels for work frequently, and he stays home with the kids. Husband only works to live, doesn't live to work, he is an avid cricket player and travels around with a local amateur team. This is costly, he spends what discretionary money he has on …
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:58 PM
2

As was I. Are you arguing my numbers without actually reading my posts? As for fact-checking the feminist agenda, it happens all the time. The issue is that when someone speaks about it, they either get deplatformed, shouted down, or someone else moves the goalposts.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 06:04 PM
1

OK so here's the thing... the chart the guy showed in the video has a lot of statistics around it, presumably showing error rates on the far right column and so forth. Also there are multiple rows for countries like the UK, USA, Portugal, etc. I presume those mean demographics based on things like income, ethnicity, etc. I just added all the numbers up in a spreadsheet, without taking into account the one row for "USA and European" because that number of total paternity tests was larger than all…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 05:50 PM
1

Why don't you post it? Data is good. Reasonable review of data is better.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:28 PM
1

A number of the data points were small samples (some with high rates, others with low rates), which I and the video mentioned. It would be worthwhile to add all the numbers up for individual countries and draw one calculation if you're looking at just general numbers. Anyway, I chose to stay on the low side of things because my intent would be that people repeat statistics that are not exaggerated (which weakens the point in the long run). Even on the low side of things, the data are damning, an…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 02:29 PM
2

So this is interesting and I'm going to summarize the really salient statistics because this talking point gets tossed around incorrectly by BOTH sides of the discussion. There are two main types of data here: 1) Data from DNA testing when there is some suspected/disputed paternity The rate of paternity fraud when DNA testing is done when there is some dispute as to the true father of the child ranged from ~15 to 30%, with some sample sizes being rather small, others being quite large (relativel…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 12:36 PM
32

It's impossible to separate politics from movements like feminism - primarily because feminism is a POLITICAL movement.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 09:02 PM
3

That's what I thought...
/r/MensRights16/06/23 05:04 AM
5

You feeling all clever because you selectively quoted parts of my post and made some sort of comment that you think is going to set me straight on whatever pointless point you're making? Did you climax with those women you say felt like a mouse's waist coat (whatever the fuck that has to do with anything)? A woman will do her best to provide you with enjoyable sex if she has genuine desire for you, period. What makes her have a genuine desire for you is whether or not she feels like you're a goo…
/r/MensRights16/06/23 04:52 AM
8

This is LITERALLY evolutionary biology. Nobody is scummy or virtuous because of it. It just IS. The importance here is that you are aware of the trends and that you act accordingly. As a guy who has sampled a fair bit of pussy, it pretty much all feels the same. The trick is finding a woman who is enthusiastic and pleasant to be around regardless of where she sits on the sexual marketplace hierarchy. As men, we trade our effort, our protection, our physicality, etc. for access to enjoyable sex. …
/r/MensRights16/06/23 02:44 AM
3

So, I guess if you are in a woman's house or apartment where she lives alone, and there is no food in the fridge, and the place is a filthy shithole, you know she's a feminist.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 02:55 PM
8

Mothers don't care about kids getting money. They care about being able to continue the lifestyle they had while married, without being married anymore. LITERALLY, no actual legitimate financial planner or accountant would advocate child support being calculated the way it is... UNLESS they were being paid based on the amount of child support they ordered to change hands.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 03:54 AM
16

Then, there is no reason that the accuser should remain anonymous either, because without the publically available and attributable accusation and testimony of the accuser, the government can just put ANYONE on trial for anything and say that another person "who shall remain nameless" raised some accusation. Actively publishing accusations rather than trial results will only further weaponize despicable false accusations and incentivize them.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 03:11 AM
12

False dichotomy. It doesn't have to be one or the other. FFS.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 02:14 AM
8

Hahaha! An all female crew on a trip to Mars for as long a duration as it would take to get there (not even considering the return trip) would murder each other well before they ever got there.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 12:59 AM
3

Look at the video that breaks down the $760+ million a year Texas gets in federal incentive/kickback funds.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 04:38 AM
8

I'm collecting a few YouTube videos for you: https://youtu.be/w1HadqGVyxI https://youtu.be/zVPPfMSPGAA https://youtu.be/ZY6KjSf8Hb4 https://youtu.be/tDcs2Ga2abA https://youtu.be/196XCAXfqrI https://youtu.be/rRTUCOxANWk
/r/MensRights12/04/23 04:28 AM
57

There are really two reasons for this - and neither of them are ACTUALLY about the "best interest of the child." The reasons for this are ALL about the best interests of the State. In the US, Title IV-D of the Social Security Act (look it up) ensures that individual states see kickbacks from $0.66 to upwards of $1.25 for every dollar they spend to ensure maximum funds are transacted in child support (which means the most lopsided custodial offers possible). These federal funds pay the salaries o…
/r/MensRights12/04/23 01:42 AM
17

What could they (ex-GF and her mother) possibly have to gain from this?
/r/MensRights11/04/23 07:13 PM
5

How is ANYONE surprised at this?
/r/MensRights11/04/23 03:20 PM
3

LOL this is a troll article.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 12:16 AM
18

Especially in the case of housewives, they don't consider the value of the housing, health insurance, vehicle, utilities, car insurance, groceries, vacations, clothing, spending money, etc. that are paid for by the man who works outside the home as payment for their work inside the home. One of the reasons they don't consider these things as their compensation is because they feel they already own all those things... unfortunately, family court pretty much agrees.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 12:03 AM
8

Honestly, I am saying this to you with true kindness in my heart... ...there is no situation or occasion where the fact that something being ON TwoX or NOT ON TwoX makes for a talking point that is worth consideration, let alone a "good" talking point. Your life will be better if you just forget that sub exists EXCEPT as a screening tool for women you may encounter. Protip: If you meet a woman who is a redditor and posts on TwoX, just walk away and don't look back.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 02:11 PM
1

I have often said that as the decimal point moves right on your income, so does your voting.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 02:14 PM
5

So... have any examples?
/r/MensRights22/02/23 08:32 PM
2

I haven't seen this sort of thing play out in the media. Have any examples?
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:23 PM
4

Bro, what is it that you would have me do? All you can do is work on yourself.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:21 PM
8

The couple started dating in October 2019 after meeting via the Plenty of Fish dating website. Miss Peet gave birth to their first child in September the following year and then their second in October 2021. Can anyone see how this guy could have avoided falilng in with this gold digging diasaster? Here's an excerpt of one of my own posts I made a couple days ago: The single most important thing I can say to young men today about dating and marriage is that you absolutely MUST MUST MUST be invol…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:14 PM
4

I feel for ya, man, I do. I wish you the best.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:10 PM
-9

I don't know what to tell you, man. I don't mean to sound mean or even rude here, but not having a date in years sounds like the very definition of a "social problem" to me. I get that there are big problems out there - I really do. Look through my post history, I am a MRA through and through, but I do believe that we need to to better as men, and in raising boys to manhood.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:04 PM
-11

We can argue which came first all you want, but when you start as a young kid using your spare time to play online games, this detracts from your studies and inhibits your social skills at a time when developing them is VERY important. That takes away from your performance in school, and you could argue whether schools gave up on boys, or boys gave up on school, but the end result of that is pretty clear - boys are not doing so well in school these days. Poor school performance leads to reduced …
/r/MensRights22/02/23 06:55 PM
15

So, a couple things about all this... The definition of "single" in self-reporting studies like this needs to be VERY clearly elaborated because men will generally answer it objectively factually. If not in a committed relationship, then single. Meanwhile, if a woman is bouncing around between several friends with benefits, and happy with that to the point that she's not actually searching for a regular connection, she's not really in a committed relationship, but she's also not looking for one …
/r/MensRights22/02/23 05:39 PM
1

You'll know that in 30 seconds, but that isn't going to cover everything on the list.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 05:53 AM
1

What sort of filter would that be?
/r/MensRights22/02/23 04:38 AM
3

Good call on the update for the working girls. I'm a little out of that loop these days.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 10:00 PM
11

This is a Gen-X thing, unfortunately. I am a Gen-Xer, as is my wife, and we both were talking about this topic of how Millennials and Gen-Z are the way they are because of Gen-X raising and educating them last night. Gen-X created this victim-female mentality and raised their kids and infiltrated schools with it. Now, boys are suffering in education everywhere, Gen-X men are vilified by family courts at rates greater than ever before in history. Male suicide is up, false accusations are on the r…
/r/MensRights21/02/23 05:19 PM
1

You could always cite statistics from lesbian relationships, which pound for pound, have (by far) the highest incidence of DV.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 05:04 PM
46

Dating apps in your 20s are the playground of the Chads and women in general. In your 30s, things get better, but the crowd you're looking at are more desperate and are often settling for you because Chad is still busy sport fucking the 20-somethings. The single most important thing I can say to young men today about dating and marriage is that you absolutely MUST MUST MUST be involved with a woman for several years before marrying her. I would consider 4 years a minimum. During that time, and d…
/r/MensRights21/02/23 04:10 PM
2

It's garbage. They're using an "estimated number" to "debunk" an objectively obtained number (which itself is not very well described in regard to how they arrive at it and I suspect is low anyway). Even if we accept that the figure given for false accusations of ~4% is legitimately true and objectively correctly derived, it's absolute stupidity to conflate that with some estimate of some event that is loosely defined, not objectively described, nor based on anything observable at all. ​ Imagine…
/r/MensRights20/02/23 06:37 PM
12

You're in a no-win situation answering that question. If you make less than her, she will think that this is the natural order of things. If you make more than she does, she will go complain about sexism. Further, depending on the company policies/laws, you might wind up in trouble for sharing how much you earn with another colleague.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 06:33 PM
5

A man could do the same with a dead woman's money. It's called marriage. Here's the thing though: a woman will almost NEVER marry a man who is worth less $$ than she is. Interestingly, it has been my personal experience watching it occur in 3 separate marriages - long marriages, of middle aged couples... when the wife inherited or was going to soon inherit a large sum of money, she filed for divorce. In two out of the 3 cases, the women filed for divorce, were awarded alimony, and within a year …
/r/MensRights17/02/23 09:09 PM
0

If the guy was serious about wanting this all to travel down the male line of his family, he should have set up a trust that would have seen his wife cared for in some capacity. He just did this all wrong. The trick here will be to ensure that the wife's half of the estate includes half of the liablities (debts) of the estate as well.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 09:01 PM
2

I'd bet it's exactly the opposite - the more a woman is into you, the more likely she is to test you.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 06:03 PM
1

Pretty much all women "shit-test", but the degree to which they do and the WAY they do it and their expectations from it vary. I think men and women test each other differently. Women, in my experience, often will do so in an overt manner - by asking you questions directly. A red flag might be if the woman manipulates situations to create conflicts only to see how you'll respond. Testing isn't always a bad thing though. The more into you that the woman is, the more she might "test" you in certai…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 06:01 PM
1

Haha, nah... I was more worried that I was coming off as a "know-it-all boomer"! To add clarity to my remark - you said you thought academics were spouting bunk for the past 5 years or so... I was trying to express that I thought it maybe started as long as 12 or 13 years ago... but that I was comparing it to the academics of my own college days which ended in 1992. There was a bit of a tacit assumption that perhaps you were somewhat younger and maybe last dealt with "academics" in a more recent…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 04:17 PM
1

I'm not even sure what you mean. I took your remark as a joke and actually laughed about it.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 02:30 PM
1

I'd put it as far back as 2008/9, but then I'm comparing it to 1992...
/r/MensRights16/02/23 03:28 AM
3

The funny thing about this statistic is that the same academics who redefined racism such that it is impossible to act in a racist manner towards whatever group is "dominant" or "in power", have also redefined domestic violence. I believe that they did this in DIRECT response to research from Pizzey and others who confirmed her results. Nowadays the academics are pushing a definition of domestic violence that EXCLUDES and completely denies the existence of reciprocal DV on the grounds that it ca…
/r/MensRights15/02/23 09:18 PM
2

Heh, what a giant load of bullshit. No matter how thoroughly the pay gap myth is debunked, these clowns continue to parrot it. They are best ignored.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:26 PM
13

I'm sorry this cognitive dissonance is destroying your ability to think clearly here. Are you sure you ever could think clearly?
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:16 PM
3

Well, that's the point of vetting them before you marry them. There's gonna be a fair number of crazy cat lady spinster feminists in about 10 to 15 years. No great loss.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:14 PM
12

So is this the game where you just keep ignoring what the person said and pretend like they said the opposite? Stop being a monkey. If I engaged in public discussion of these points on Twitter or Facebook or similar, and I was not anonymous, I would lose my job and be deplatformed. Further, depending on how viral the discussions became, I'd see IRS agents auditing my tax records for the last 30 years and who knows what else.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:05 PM
4

The thing is, you have to engage in a personal level. A person is smart or reasonably so. PEOPLE are dumb, dangerous animals.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 11:00 PM
7

Have you been to a college campus lately?
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:56 PM
7

Well, it's more like whether reparations for women are reasonable, or why the fundamental tenet of Marxism relies on the complete denial of human nature itself, or whether or not women make false accusations, or whether the duluth model is a reasonable standard for the adjudication of all marital law, or whether people should be shunned from society and/or forcibly removed from it if they don't agree with the entirety of the party line...
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:39 PM
5

Grats on not reading beyond the first two sentences!
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:32 PM
6

It's a pretty good bet that they might be shit-testing. Here's an interesting video on shit-testing that's worth a look for you I think. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ho2m6yBNrr4&t=463s
/r/MensRights14/02/23 09:58 PM
7

This is smart. I added a lot to my post above, presumably after you started typing this, in which I advocated that you gradually bring a woman around to seeing things correctly using a metered, non-abrasive approach whenever you can. Very similar stuff to what you wrote here. Of course, that doesn't mean you should ever tolerate bullshit and mistreatement in the name of a "metered" approach either, but you don't have to wear the whole of the manosphere and it's list of grievances on your sleeve.…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 09:38 PM
17

It's almost as if feminism, Marxism, and other leftist principles like silencing the free exchange of ideas run hand in hand... I've said it before and will say it again: Radical ideologies cannot tolerate or permit open, free discourse because open, free discourse shines the light of day on the flaws and failings of their radical ideologies. Under the scrutiny of open, free discourse, radical ideologies will cease to exist - which is why radical ideologies always seek to ban it.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 09:36 PM
6

It's a fair consideration for anyone.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 09:35 PM
1

I agree with almost all of your post and have heard feminists and other simps make the kinds of statements you speak about. The only part of your post I disagree with is this: Radical egalitarians do not call for the murder of a group of people to “make the world a better place”. Radical feminists do. Radical egalitarians today are basically socialists masquerading under a less objectionable label (the same way many socialists and female-supremacists masquerade as "feminists") and socialists esp…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 09:06 PM
14

Do these women treat YOU as a second class person? Do they treat YOU with misandry? Lots of people say lots of things because they don't really think them through. Certainly people might find deeply polar ideologies might make them not a good romantic match, but there is a BIG difference between words and actions. Here is what I suggest: Do not simp. Do not put on a vagina hat, do not wear feminist slogans on your apparel and do not take her out in public with you if she is doing so. If the woma…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:53 PM
-2

Marxists don't believe in equality, they believe in egalitarianism - equal OUTCOMES for all, not equal OPPORTUNITY for all. Feminism is founded in Marxist and socialist principles and has been since the term became popular in the mid-19th century.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:38 PM
1

The thing is that setting aside the "roommate" situation, the way landlords get around renting to people they don't want to is to take rental applications via email, and don't make any sort of discriminatory statements in their advertisement like "women preferred" or whatnot. They just DON'T rent to men, or whatever other group of people they don't want to. They never say this in advertisements, but good luck proving they discriminated without some sort of recorded evidence.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:32 PM
2

In most places, there are fair housing laws which prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, race, sexual orientation, religion, nationality, or disability. Many of these restrictions are lifted if you are renting to a roommate who will share much of your living space with you. Usually there is code which determines if the space you're renting has to be done as a standalone/separate housing unit or a "roommate" type of situation. To be honest, if the government says a baker has to make a cake …
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:25 PM
6

As I said above, renting a standalone dwelling is pretty much the same... If you're renting something like an in-law suite that has its own entrance/exit/plumbing and no other shared internal spaces, you're going to typically be subject to any fair housing laws. If you're renting a bedroom in your home and sharing common areas like kitchen, bathrooms, hallways, entrance/exits, etc. then you can discriminate between roommates.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:21 PM
6

Are you saying that you want to implement some type of law where you have no power as to who can and cannot live with you in a house you own or a lease you're responsible for? Such laws already exist. While these laws generally SAY that it is illegal to discriminate against a person for the sale or rental of a property based on that person's race, color, national origin, sex, religion, familial status, or disability, the enforcement of those laws varies WILDLY. If you believe you're being discri…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 08:16 PM
1

Man that's some pretty spectacular mental gymnastics to get around the cognitive dissonance created by the fact that Feminism is a leftist concept. I fucking promise you that if you continue to put leftists in office, you'll only get more of feminism and other socialist programs that take away your personal freedoms. ​ Also, you people talking about majority wins voting and all that other shit in the comments below make me weep for the future and wonder where in the everloving fuck my school tax…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 06:45 PM
28

Australia... I feel for you bros down under.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 01:44 AM
8

Yeah, it was a fair mix of purple haired girls wanting to transition to boys and boys wanting to be girls in my wife's early days with her practice. She did hear from some of the trans males that they were having a hard time adjusting to their loss of privilege and community when they were no longer trucking with the girls. They were particularly shocked because they thought they'd get everything handed to them as males... eyes were opened even for those kids.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 11:11 PM
1

Think about this logically... Your daughter could drop out of high school and never get a GED... would you still owe your ex-wife child support if your daughter was 40 years old and still had no diploma/GED?
/r/MensRights08/02/23 07:37 PM
4

The person writing in is a gay dude... or a trans dude who is also gay...
/r/MensRights08/02/23 07:30 PM
11

That entire story sounds completely fabricated. My guess is that the dude writing in is under 25 years old, and has some sort of histrionic personality disorder, and may even be bipolar. The most telling sentence in the entire thing is this: I’ve tried counselling, but counsellors seem overwhelmed by the sheer scale of my problem and have nothing useful to say. My wife is a counselor, not a school counselor, not a social worker, but a clinical mental health counselor who owns her own practice an…
/r/MensRights08/02/23 07:30 PM
3

I think the problem is the sand in your vagina.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 08:15 AM
0

Well I *did* specify age 19...
/r/MensRights08/02/23 06:01 AM
9

And if you want to express that it should be: "Such relationships personally creep me out." rather than "It IS creepy." as if it were objective fact when it isn't......cause that signals impressionable people to say, think and feel the same rather than simply recognize your personal problem. Heh, this is an excellent point. The issue is that young people have been conditioned (as you said) to believe that their own "feels" dictate objective fact, rather than some subjective opinion (never mind t…
/r/MensRights08/02/23 05:25 AM
39

What I think about this can be summed up as follows: "LOL" ​ ​ To elaborate - there are two considerations in the minds of anyone who has some sort of beef about this, and anyone else listening to someone bitching about it, ought to keep them in mind: 1) Pound me too requires high profile, egregious cases to be brought to light in order to soothe the black eye that recent high profile cases like the Depp v. Heard one have given it. So the people who want to retain the terroristic power that the …
/r/MensRights07/02/23 09:41 PM
-3

Well... personally, I think "man-buns" are among the worst style choices for men since the fucking pork pie hat, and if some dude with one opens his mouth to talk to me, I'm expecting some sort of bullshit to come out of it. However, I support the man's prerogative to wear his hair like some sort of dipshit, even though I will personally judge him for it, and if you don't support my right to personally judge you for your choices, you can eat a big fat bag of dicks because EVERYONE is personally …
/r/MensRights07/02/23 09:23 PM
4

I believe this statistic is either a lie, or needs some qualification because in 2021, 5 out of the 46 journalists killed worldwide were women, which is just less than 1 in 9, and is up from 3 women out of the 50 total killed in 2020 - slightly more than 1 in 17. In 2022, there were anywhere from 57 to 67 journalists killed worldwide (numbers vary, presumably they may be on either the qualification of a person as a "journalist" or the circumstances of their death). I could not find any figures f…
/r/PussyPass07/02/23 08:49 PM
6

There are only a very few occasions where crying in front of others will not brand you as a soft bitch. Those are the death or potential extreme peril of your child (e.g. terminal diagnosis or something like eminent brain surgery with a 20% survival chance) or the death of a close relative (sibling, mother, father, spouse, or GOOD buddy). Under NO circumstances is "ugly crying" (sobbing, weeping, wailing, etc.) going to be tolerated. The only appropriate crying for men "in public" that others wi…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 06:02 PM
2

Anyone who frequents that sub is not interested in actually discussing anything.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 10:47 PM
9

I soon learned that I had to play this game of not involving two women who fucking hated each other in the same project. There were cliques and in-groups, rivalries and outright spite among some of them. This reminds me of a quote from an old American sitcom called Married With Children. The quote came from the main male character of the show, named Al Bundy (played by Ed O'Neill): The quote goes like this: Don't try to understand women! WOMEN understand WOMEN and they hate each other!
/r/MensRights03/02/23 01:51 PM
3

All of those observations were compiled from the various companies I've worked for throughout my career. Two of the anecdotes I related (including the one about the crying Ph.D.) were from the same company. I was making great money at that company and had changed departments and had a new boss, things were going great, I was doing big things and getting noticed by senior management. Fresh on the heels of a particularly big win I had, which I had hoped would result in a promotion and didn't, an e…
/r/MensRights03/02/23 01:41 PM
87

I have been in the workforce (US) since 1992. I've spent 23 years of that time working in fortune 500 companies that every single one of you would recognize if I named them. These are my observations and experiences regarding women in the workplace. I suspect that things are even worse in the UK for these sorts of issues, especially today: Generally speaking, women can be just as productive as men, but they do not have to be because women are not held to the same behavior and performance standar…
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:29 PM
4

The only way this can be a true statement is if you allow the definition of "consent" to be something that can be withdrawn AFTER the fact. Of course, that's preposterous... but here we are.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 01:37 AM
6

Hate to say it, the well is poisoned for this entire corporate structure for you. If you want to stay in the industry, you need to leave this current job on your own (i.e. quit with proper notice and so forth). You will obviously cite this place on your resume, and prospective employers can call to verify that you were employed for the time you stated. There is no law restricting what your former employer can say about you to a prospective employer.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 02:13 PM
1

An intelligent person doesn't typically brook a lot of "absolutes" in discussions. Further, an intelligent person understands that discourse is necessary to either confirm or expand understanding. Feminist theory relies on "absolutes" and does not brook any discourse because it is an extremist movement, and like all extremist movements, would evaporate under the light shed by legitimate discourse.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 06:06 PM
9

I too appreciate this sub. However, I feel a need to respond to one thing you said: ​ We are also not ideologically-driven, we promote 100% diversity of thought and opinion I'd say we're about 80% non-ideologically-driven and promote about 80% diversity of thought and opinion, with the 20% rejection of diversity of thought/opinion probably evenly split between mod bias and participant bias. However, this is still about 7 or 8 logarithms better than pretty much any other sub on this platform. ​ T…
/r/MensRights26/01/23 08:16 PM
3

There is a difference between "what would you do" and "what should you be allowed to do". The difference is the way laws are written. To answer the "what would you do" question, you have to either say you'd follow the law, which means pay child support (assuming a paternity test confirms your fatherhood) because legally, you have no other choice, or break the law. Now, consider the question: "What legal options should you have if a woman you're sleeping with gets pregnant and decides to have the…
/r/MensRights26/01/23 07:58 PM
1

If I were to guess, I would guess that there is a fair bit of shit-testing going on with the teenage daughter because a) teenage and b) daughter and c) divorced mom and dad and d) probably a shit-testing mom (based on mom's response) and e) this has been labeled the "LGBTQest" generation in history with approximately 1 in 5 "adults" in this age group identifying as LGBTQ+ which is about twice as high as the rate of Millennials, four times higher than Gen-X, and 8 times higher than Boomers. My wi…
/r/MensRights26/01/23 07:49 PM
1

I agree with you on this topic... I agree that the idea of heirarchy is baked into human nature, and is anathema to Marxists (or why Marxism is anathema to human nature - either way you want to look at it). I would add also that this idea of heirarchy is actually the reason why human progress exists at all, and since you brought it up, I believe that not only is Marxism a flawed idea due to these inalienable aspects of human nature, but further, that Marxism would set humanity and human progress…
/r/MensRights26/01/23 06:06 PM
1

The "nature" of people needs to be considered in the aggregate and over the course of a lifetime. The "nature" of a sub-25 year old person is very different than that person's "nature" when they are 35. Here's the thing about "forced" monogamy - it's "forced" by our biological imperative - by our "nature". Lots of people want to think that monogamy is "forced" by Judeo-Christian values, or by western legal constructs (rooted in Judeo-Christian principles), but the fact is that these are largely …
/r/MensRights26/01/23 05:39 PM
2

I had to read this post a couple times to really get what you were saying. But you've put a lot of wisdom in this post, and people would do well to read it and understand it.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 05:11 PM
94

The problem with this theory is that it operates on the principle that women deserve to have "it all" (because presumably, men have "had it all" for so long). The issue with that theory is that NOBODY gets to have it all, not men, not women, not the rich, not the famous, NOBODY! ALL of life is a compromise for EVERYONE! The whole trick is to get what you need to be happy. That definition is different for everyone. edit thank you, kind stranger, for the silver!
/r/MensRights25/01/23 10:14 PM
19

I understand what you're talking about but I think it's not always as cut and dry as you believe you're seeing it to be. There are a lot of "left/right" issues clouding the matter. There are a lot of "unfinished prefrontal cortex development" (i.e. age) issues clouding the matter. There is a TON of misinformation clouding the matter.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 03:12 PM
7

Besides the fact that this sort of post is so laughably absurd as to be beneath consideration, for about a dozen reasons, the reversibility of vasectomies and retention of actual fertility after a reversal (these are separate things, yes they really are) is VASTLY overestimated.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 06:21 AM
7

So, for any who are about to ask "what does this have to do with men's rights", this has a direct impact on male firefighters in Connecticut. Because only 10 to 15% of women could pass the physical fitness tests for firefighters, CT dems are advocating allowing women to completely skip these tests as part of their qualification to become firefighters. Bear in mind that these physical fitness tests are designed to simulate what it would be like to be fully geared and have to navigate and perform …
/r/MensRights20/01/23 04:14 PM
3

Tate is a man, with a controversial personality who, at the peak of the controversy around him is arrested on the basis of some allegations of sex crimes that appear rather suspiciously out of the blue, and is being held without bail. It's one thing if you don't like Tate, and I'm not here to change your mind on that. It's another altogether to not recognize that this pattern looks suspicious and to further not realize how such measures can be used to silence anyone that the "powers that be" don…
/r/MensRights20/01/23 03:30 PM
5

What a fuckin' disaster!
/r/MensRights20/01/23 03:41 AM
2

You'll find fewer people who have NOT been in such a relationship than those who HAVE been in one.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 06:59 PM
2

The use of these statistics is planned, and drawn from a list of carefully curated terms. The important thing is to keep people on track when they use statistics like this and not allow them to state things incorrectly in order to support whatever argument they're trying to make. Example using the typical definitions of terms: Is attempted rape (someone tried to penetrate but was not successful) different from completed rape (penetration actually occurred)? Take a look through this PDF document …
/r/MensRights18/01/23 03:48 PM
1

Sure... Today, there is no less space for "artistic" (i.e. not "traditionally masculine" men than there has always been. If anything there is more space for them. There CERTAINLY isn't less space for such men than when I was younger (I'm 53 now). Further, the perception of many so-called "artistic" men isn't hugely different today than it used to be. Many are perceived as effeminate, just like they have always been. There is a lot of discussion about alphas and betas and whatever else, but that'…
/r/MensRights18/01/23 02:22 PM
2

"Ally" is the term I should have used along with "advocate". Anyway, true!!
/r/MensRights18/01/23 02:06 PM
1

In the same space as always.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 04:49 AM
4

Traditional values implied give and take between the sexes. Men were afforded some deference in return for their sacrifices. Women were afforded different deference for their different sacrifices. Both sides had various benefits and liabilities, different from each other's, but a reasonable balance. Today, feminists have laid claim to the rewards and benefits men used to get, taking them from men for themselves or refusing to allow men to have them. The ostensible purpose of these acts by femini…
/r/MensRights18/01/23 04:08 AM
1

This is the way.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 12:57 AM
7

Well maybe I leapt to a conclusion there... you said you were in therapy to come to terms with your skewed views on things. What were those views you realized were skewed?
/r/MensRights17/01/23 10:33 PM
13

Well, I guess I don't know what else to say to you man other than that I hate that you went through that stuff. Thank you for explaining it, I do appreciate it. What do YOU think about female entitlement today? I'm just curious. You said you were in therapy to help get over your disillusionment...
/r/MensRights17/01/23 10:21 PM
3

So, biologically/physiologically, males actually fully mentally mature (in the aggregate) about a year or two later than women (in the aggregate). This is speaking directly to the full formation of the prefrtonal cortex of the brain, which is responsible for the highest ordered thought our species is capable of. This is where complex decision making happens with a thorough understanding of risks/rewards, actions/consequences, ability to plan for future events, both good and bad and so forth. The…
/r/MensRights17/01/23 10:01 PM
20

Please bear in mind that I am making WILD ASS guesses about the circumstances of this whole thing, based solely on a two sentence comment, presumably from the guy's mother. It's possible that I'm hilariously and even embarrassingly wrong, but I'm just basing my guesses on personal experiences - which probably need some context: I'm a 53 year old cis het white guy, and I went through what the teens and late millennials are going thorugh now in a lighter version in the 1990s when I was in my 20s. …
/r/MensRights17/01/23 09:45 PM
82

Her son probably thought he was a great "advocate" for women, hung around them thinking that he would be among the "chosen" when it came time to pass out the pussy, only to then find himself firmly in the friend zone with every woman he knew. Alternatively, he probably made a convenient target of himself and found himself on the receiving end of a false accusation levied against him. Finally, and this is the scenario I hope happened: maybe he saw his buddies getting hosed by false accusations, l…
/r/MensRights17/01/23 09:08 PM
162

You did us a solid, bro (sis?). Nobody wants to subscribe to quora, especially for this stuff... and so you get my upvotes as well!
/r/MensRights17/01/23 09:03 PM
335

Heh... here we see the results of someone who in all likelihood claims "feminism" is about equality, but who also, in all likelihood, raised her son as a "real" feminist. Is it any wonder he wants nothing to do with women after being taught by his mother that: he is an awful human being his presence on the planet is only justified by the amount of thankless services and resources he can provide for women any desires he may have for gratitude beyond being allowed to coexist in the role of silent,…
/r/MensRights17/01/23 07:25 PM
3

TBH, I don't totally disagree with the practice, as there are definitely roles that are incredibly dominated by straight white males, and there are unfortunately people that ARE biased, but I feel that the practice is a bit discriminatory in itself. What about the fields that are incredibly dominated by females? Do recruiters for those positions look for "diversity hires"? Why should it matter if a field is dominated by any particular demographic, as long as the hiring practices are such that th…
/r/MensRights09/01/23 03:07 PM
2

Has anyone else seen the Big think video that came out like 3 days ago? Link please? DM it to me if you don't want it here and don't mind...
/r/MensRights07/01/23 05:53 PM
1

So, all life is therefore immoral?
/r/MensRights06/01/23 09:19 PM
2

The advice in these posts is good - you should take it. This woman is attempting to set you up, and if you don't protect yourself now, the likelihood is EXTREMELY high that she will escalate her lies and claims until they do more than just damage your reputation. It is likely she wants to destroy your current relationship AT A MINIMUM. She will likely attempt to mess with your employment or the school you're in, she may even escalate to the point of filing false police reports against you, which…
/r/MensRights06/01/23 07:15 PM
2

Are you saying you believe that because a person did not give consent to exist, it is wrong to make them exist, and so you believe it is morally wrong for humans to procreate?
/r/MensRights06/01/23 07:05 PM
7

Without a RADICAL measures or interventions, this dad will never get custody. He has been branded the abuser through false allegations and WWT legal wrangling. It's a fucking shameful disaster.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 04:33 PM
6

Mainstream media won't cover it because they're the ones pushing the agenda. I'm not glorifying tabloid rags, but compared to MSM, what do they have to lose? If you're interested, you can find hours of this guy's content that he has put up himself.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 04:31 PM
5

World War Trans.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 04:28 PM
1

Whatever you do, you might think about fucking her enough that she gets you a new TV and laptop. You're not getting these back any other way. If you try to go after her in civil court for them, you'll find yourself facing criminal charges.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 09:49 PM
2

Academia (educational institutions) is where the indoctrination starts... it should be no surprise that this idea is firmly entrenched there.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 08:23 PM
6

This is fucking glorious!!!
/r/MensRights05/01/23 08:17 PM
6

Paternity testing should just be done as soon as possible during the pregnancy (it's 99% accurate even in the 8th week of the pregnancy). This allows the not-father to make his decision about what he's going to do about the marriage/relationship, and gives the mother time to address whether or not she wants to carry the child to term (in states which allow abortion) or go after the actual baby-daddy. Honestly, if a woman has an objection to this, her objection should be just assumed an admission…
/r/MensRights05/01/23 08:13 PM
3

HAHAHAHAHA!!! What fucking terribly lopsided, utterly tone deaf advice... are people even trying to hide their misandry anymore?
/r/MensRights02/01/23 05:56 PM
11

You're not wrong for feeling however you feel. Your feelings are presumably based on your own morality, which is pretty reasonably mainstream and nowhere near as "fringe" of a morality that many today would attempt to gaslight you into believing it is. However, she doesn't owe you an apology. She is responsible for doing those things, and accountable for them, but she didn't do them to you. She didn't do them against your wishes (she didn't even know, or wasn't dating you when she did those thin…
/r/MensRights02/01/23 05:43 PM
26

It's pre-programmed gaslighting by the feminist agenda. Honestly, you could argue that it might be pre-programmed throughout the history of organized society. Cuckoldry has been around since there have been two men and one woman around... so... forever. People agree to get STD tests before they start having unprotected sex with each other. Men are asked by women to blindly "trust" that the woman takes her birth control regularly - when we all know good and fucking well that this trust is misplac…
/r/MensRights02/01/23 05:31 PM
0

World War Trans.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 05:48 AM
1

I don't understand.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 03:14 PM
12

You know, I am humbled by your response, and I'm grateful to you for it. I am SHOCKED to understand that only 8% of prisoners are in private prisons. Thank you, honestly, for informing me.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 01:40 AM
2

It's important to realize that when you're dealing with gaslighting narcissists (which is what the typical person is who calls masculinity "toxic"), that accusations are actually confessions.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 08:48 PM
3

I'm married to a woman. We just had sex this morning, it was pretty great. What is it that you think you're accomplishing here again?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 08:40 PM
3

One of the most tedious things around here is how people like you come to a thread, where the same thing has been posted and answered numerous times and keep on saying it. Tell me, is it because you didn't read the other responses, or that you think your way of saying the same thing is somehow novel and enlightened?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 07:43 PM
45

The United States has a prison problem that is focused around privately run prisons. The War on Drugs has done a great deal to line the pockets of private prison corporations and keep politicians flush with campaign funding from those corporate donors. The answer is not to remove the possibility of prison from women. We see how women act in the absence of deterrents. Consider the deterrent that men live under with every single face to face interaction they have: there's a pretty good chance that…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 07:38 PM
7

Heh... this I believe.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 07:24 PM
104

Her male accomplice got 82 years.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 07:22 PM
1

Yeah, I didn't mean to make a big deal out of guessing about your personality, it was a moment's musing on why a woman who seemed so reasonable would find herself with such limited relationship options over the long term. FYI, I call you "reasonable" not because you expressed a general respect for men, but because you reach a very rational conclusion that choosing between a bad relationship and no relationship is pretty easy math. That aside... I agree with you about the types of women who make …
/r/MensRights30/12/22 07:20 PM
1

You're not wrong.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 07:16 PM
7

It's extremely difficult for anyone here to advise you because you will need to do what's in your heart. It's your own flesh and blood you're dealing with here, and only you can know what that means to you. None of us can judge you for whatever decision you make either, for the same reasons. However, we can give you advice on how to proceed with regard to taking legal ramifications into account. I would contact an attorney and see what potential liabilities might exist for you. Further, I have t…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 07:14 PM
43

Empathy just means that you have the ability to understand, and even feel the emotions of another. Do not mistake the ability to perceive emotions as a de facto driver for good deeds or comforting others. Having empathy does not automatically imply that someone might ACT in a helpful manner as a result of understanding the emotions of another individual, though this often is the way empathy is (incompletely, or incorrectly, in my opinion) gauged. Sometimes, if your goal is to emotionally hurt so…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:56 PM
12

Porn addiction and the marginalization of boys and young men is not an accident, neither is the objectification of women. This is all happening by design.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:40 PM
3

Let's see here... Strengthening Title IX unconstitutionality? - check. End run around the bill of rights? - check. Feminists happy and in support? - check. Democrat sponsored and supported? - check.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:26 PM
5

We were all birthed by women, and could not have been conceived without a man. What's your point? When you go out on social media and see these tryhards and their "I don't need a man" speeches, they always back their argument with sweeping generalizations about men in general and how men are useless to them. Meeting random lesbian on the street who says she doesn't need a man for romance/relatnionship things is one thing. I rarely see these sorts of women making tik tok videos about how men are …
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:16 PM
1

But if it comes down to deciding between a bad male partner and being single with my left hand and dildo I'm going with single. I don't need a man, even if I am part of a good society that is roughly half men. Fortunately, it almost NEVER will come down to this choice for you (at least not for the long term - I mean, dry spells are dry spells, and sometimes ya gotta do what ya gotta do). The reason for this is that, as you said, you ARE part of a society that is slightly less than half men, the …
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:09 PM
2

Don't listen to what women SAY, watch what they DO.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:56 PM
5

And really... this is what the women who make social media posts about how they don't need men are saying.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:39 PM
1

I find that men tend to be drawn to evolutionary biology/psych, so I’m not sure why this confuses so many. Women are bearers of children. That comes with all sorts of risks. Women are biologically and evolutionarily primed towards looking for men who can take care of them and their offspring. Is it logical? No, not in todays world. But, I think lust/attraction cannot be bartered or negotiated. On a lizard brain level, the man that makes more is more attraction. I agree with you. I really do. One…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:33 PM
1

I applaud your intent to stay logical, and would never besmirch or in any other way chastise your personal choices with regard to your sexuality and whatnot, but I need to ask you to take a look back at the post that you replied to because I added some to it, I think after you replied above. I'll add it again to this post for simplicity. This thing I've said below is all about logic. You see, women SAY all sorts of things - in response to various pressures, or in order to give certain impression…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:02 PM
4

Well again, if the women who say "I don't need a man" didn't justify their statements with sweeping generalizations about ALL men, I wouldn't take issue. The thing is, they VERY VERY rarely make such distinctions, yet continue to talk about how ALL men are useless to them since they, you know, have a job, an apartment, and a car that they maybe paid for themselves. Your point about the language (and honestly, your typing could use some work on clarity here) is pretty much moot by virtue of the f…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:52 PM
12

None. But I haven't ever abused or battered or coerced a woman either... I have worked in various construction fields, including electrical and plumbing work.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:42 PM
2

If those women said "I don't need a man to fulfill my personal/romantic/sexual needs." I wouldn't really take issue. I know a fair number of lesbians, and about a third of the lesbian couples I know feature at least one partner that could reasonably handle more "traditional men's work" better than half the men I know. But here's the thing, the women who say "I don't need a man" do not say what you said. They back up their statement (aside from the romantic/sexual aspect) with statements like: "I…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:41 PM
12

The majority of female dominated fields wouldn't even exist without the industry of men. Aside from healthcare, which is female dominated because it's indoor work that allows extreme flexibility, look at all the other female dominated industries. Who needs human resources for a company that doesn't exist because men never invented the product it makes? Who needs the vast numbers of lawyers to deal with corporations that similarly wouldn't exist without the industry of men? Who needs large number…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:24 PM
48

Hahaha... this is fucking brilliant!!
/r/MensRights30/12/22 04:14 PM
6

There are dozens, maybe hundreds of laws that judges are supposed to follow, probably several books worth of them in every jurisdiction about how custody and these sorts of things are supposed to work by statute. They are all trumped by the fact that at the end of all of those laws and statutes, the judge is given, by law, the ability to make their own decision, based on their own personal moral or whatever other stance they want to apply. Meanwhile, judges have huge dockets with dozens and doze…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:14 PM
4

Identity politics is a real bitch... If you identify as a member of a group, rather than as an individual, you will tend to see everything as some sort of collection of groups. You will also tend to frame your arguments around the biases that you hold about the group you identify with. MRA and Feminism isn't specifically a left/right political thing. The left supports all the radical tenets of feminism, except TERFs. If you want to get canceled by the left quicker than Kanye, just bring up some …
/r/MensRights29/12/22 06:01 PM
4

I'm a "live and let live" kinda guy, unlike people who think that all men should be weak or that all men should be strong. Also, we don't need a military presence in the world; we just need to protect ourselves. There will always be strong men and there will always be weak men. The strong men are enough to keep our country safe. The thing about this is that the rest of the world doesn't necessarily subscribe to the "live and let live" philosophy. Global politics are much more complex than everyo…
/r/MensRights29/12/22 05:25 PM
-1

This argument is such tired bullshit. The laws were created with the best of intentions, but like every other time, it all went too far. Meanwhile, feminists - actual females - are ACTIVELY working AGAINST making the laws less biased. They are ACTIVELY working AGAINST the efforts of MRA to get rid of this objectively proven faulty Duluth model as the basis for these kinds of cases. The fact is that women can't conceive of what it's like to be on the receiving end of the lopsided bullshit that fe…
/r/MensRights27/12/22 06:28 PM
4

I wonder if the wife has taken any responsibility for the initiation of the end of this guy's life. IMO, she's entirely to blame - she KNEW the way the legal system would react, and she made the false allegations against him to spite him. 100% her fault. Something tells me that she hasn't accepted any responsibility, and never will.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 06:01 PM
2

Let me simplify this for you... Shithead women use this term to silence you because they can get away with it. Ignore them. Don't bother trying to explain to them that they're acting like fools and using the term incorrectly because they will accuse you of further mansplaining. They think they have the "checkmate" answer to silencing you, but they're actually playing checkers, and these are juvenile, schoolyard antics...
/r/MensRights24/12/22 06:01 PM
11

It really is ironic how quickly they (females in show business) forget how much they'd jump up and down, scream bloody murder, piss their pants, and call in the fucking cavalry, if the shit they do to their male co-stars was done to them.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 09:48 PM
10

The reason for the double standard is that society believes this: Men have one choice of "purpose", which is to provide for a woman and children, period. The way a man becomes a valued commodity is by working on and/or achieving the means to fulfill that purpose. Women have a choice of "purpose". Like men, they can choose for their purpose to be to provide for their children, they ALSO can choose to make their purpose to snag a man to provide for her and her children. Women only have to worry ab…
/r/MensRights17/12/22 03:59 PM
2

Our arrival at this point was inevitable. This is how the purveyors of the woke agenda wind up eating themselves - you can never be woke enough to satisfy them, they will ALWAYS need someone to bludgeon with their foolishness, and will turn on each other in their efforts to out-virtue-signal each other.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 10:30 PM
2

Anyone in the US should consider Title IX debacles over the past few years and hopefully recall my previous urging regarding this and the way the current administration favors greater empowerment of Title IX kangaroo courts and actions under the blatantly unconstitutional structure of Title IX enforcement. It is my belief that this administration (which openly supports this nonsense and dares anyone to object) sees Title IX as an end run around constitutionally defined judicial proceedings in th…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 12:16 AM
3

It's about a 20ish year cycle in my life, at least. This is 2.5 for me, born in 1970.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 02:09 AM
2

Right on. Thanks for clarifying. I mean it. Sorry I didn't get what you were putting down.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 02:08 AM
4

More truth!!
/r/MensRights08/12/22 11:50 PM
2

I hear you, brother. Right on.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 11:39 PM
3

Thank you!
/r/MensRights08/12/22 11:27 PM
2

Yeah. I'm just putting forth an analysis of what the article and study said.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 11:24 PM
48

Hard times create strong men. Strong men create easy times. Easy times create soft men. Soft men create hard times. ​ Work your plans gentlemen, stay focused, stay on track, do not be distracted.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 10:23 PM
10

Yeah bud, for sure. Minorities in the US are under greater economic uncertainty/stress than whites for sure (I say this to you as probably one of the whitest looking dudes you ever met, and only even bring that up in the interest of transparency). There are lots of reasons for the economic woes of minorities, some of them include legit social issues like generational wealth, prejudice, etc. Ugly shit that I am not sure we want to really dig into here too much. However, you are absolutely correct…
/r/MensRights08/12/22 09:56 PM
4

Show your father this thread, and in particular, the post by Karen Straughan that I copied above.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 07:54 PM
86

After reading this article, I realized that it's got a clickbait title, taken from the clickbait title of a study that was put forward by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston - which is basically the Federal Reserve, which is basically the federal government. The title of the study, and the resultant article definitely portrays the issue as one relating to male ego fragility, whether that was the intention or not, it's pretty hard to avoid the nature of the language without some fairly energetic m…
/r/MensRights08/12/22 07:53 PM
8

Thanks! 12ft.io is the only one of those that worked for me.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 07:17 PM
15

Can't read your article because it's behind a paywall.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 07:06 PM
10

We get that you think that radical feminists are bad... we agree with you. Here's the point of what I'm saying... the title and opening sentences of your OP are the issue. You said: radical feminists have ruined the definition of feminism for many people. lots of people think that feminism means "women are superior to men". and it's wrong. You say that "it's wrong" that people think feminism means "women are superior to men". This, along with the title of your thread which uses the term "real fe…
/r/MensRights08/12/22 07:03 PM
15

Ah well... then since you didn't say you WERE a true feminist, and only said you know what true feminism is, I guess you should probably just ignore all of that, eh?
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:41 PM
19

Ahh... the old "real feminism" argument... Take a look at this post from May of 2017, by Karen Straughan: https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/68v91b/comment/dh23pwo/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded fe…
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:23 PM
110

No, she won't. She'll be pissed that it took so long. She will be recognized as a feminist hero, and go on to decry the patriarchy for what it put her through, all while ignoring the fact that her release from her just prison sentence was negoiated PRECISELY BECAUSE she was a woman.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 03:31 PM
10

The thing you have to realize is that the programming on current day "feminism" has been happening in a very focused way, with a definite agenda, for a couple decades now. That focus includes the normalization of vilifying anyone who doesn't fall into lockstep alignment with the feminist agenda. In other words, anyone who speaks up to even question, let alone, argue against any aspect of the entirety of the current day feminist agenda, can safely and confidently be labeled a sexist, misogynist, …
/r/MensRights08/12/22 03:27 PM
39

How typical.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 01:23 AM
47

Almost surely, Holmes threw her CFO under the bus or made a deal with prosecutors to do so in return for not being charged with as many things, which is of course why the CFO was convicted of more things and thus, got a longer sentence. I wonder how the sentences for the same crimes that they were both convicted of (if any) compared.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 12:47 AM
5

This is really a heartbreaking story. One thing that stood out for me in this story that I wanted to bring up is how the text message from the mother to the not-father was how she cheated only "the one time"... That is such a common line from women who cheat - like they expect you to believe that they just sort of tripped and the other guy's hard cock accidentally landed in their vagina just for long enough for him to ejaculate and impregnate her, like 30 seconds, tops!!! It was just that tinly …
/r/MensRights07/12/22 11:35 PM
1

LOL I thought I'd check out that show, got to exactly that scene shown in the first 15 seconds, and turned it off and removed it from "my list". Also, yes, OP, I agree with you on the "gender" discussions. It is why I believe so much in the statements of other MRAs: Don't listen to what women SAY, pay attention to what they DO. I wish there were a way to permanently delete shows from your Netflix feed so that they never show up in your feed again, and further, so that no shows LIKE them ever sho…
/r/MensRights07/12/22 11:17 PM
2

What a disaster. I wonder what the rate of paternity fraud actually is. When I say fraud, I mean the mother actually being aware that the man who thinks he is the father might not be, or she knows he is not, and doesn't tell him vs. a situation where the man knowingly raises a kid he knows isn't his. When you consider countries like France, in which it is illegal to have a paternity test performed on children without the mother's consent or a judge's order, I'd be willing to bet the rate is clos…
/r/MensRights07/12/22 10:50 PM
1

No doubt. I was only trying to address what I felt was the article's insistence that this was something deserving special consideration as "male vs. female", rather than consideration as a "lunatic who committed an atrocity."
/r/MensRights07/12/22 07:29 PM
2

It surely was an ugly shooting. The guy who did it was surely mentally ill. He surely targeted females. His motivations were clearly anti-feminist and he was clearly aware of what he was doing - which does not change the fact that he was mentally unfit to be walking around outside of an institution, let alone able to purchase firerams.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 08:40 PM
3

I applaud your attutide there, honestly, I truly do, and I suspect that a lot of people actually think similarly to you at the beginning of those types of careers. I also suspect that your attitudes in this regard would be self-selecting, or should I say self-deselecting for either initial obtainment of or longevity in those positions. I don't think your bosses on the police force would tolerate you not going with the status quo in this regard. Many police departmental policies state that when r…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 05:53 PM
5

The biggest white knight simps are cops. On any given day, in any given situation, a cop has the ability to fuck you up, big time. All they need is to find the will to make YOU the focus of their efforts. They don't need a reason beyond you not being a cop yourself, just the desire to do it.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:01 PM
12

"I normally just let her break stuff and ask for my help after." This is hilariously true in my house, too. She doesn't accuse me of mansplaining, but she doesn't stop breaking shit either. My wife is a destroyer. I pretty much hide anything from her that I think she can fuck up. I have a saying in my house "1 is none, and 2 is 1" because if I let my wife near it, I'll be buying a second one.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 08:28 AM
1

Sorry if this comes off as a nasty personal dig, but honestly, I see why your parents are divorced and why you and your brother live with your dad.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 12:37 AM
10

Here is what Jordan Peterson says about women and working based on his ACTUAL experience working with them. If you still think that Olivia Wilde's perspective on Jordan Peterson merits any actual discussion, after watching that, let us know. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-J3OYjjAJo&list=LL&index=2&t=7s
/r/MensRights03/12/22 12:26 AM
1

Yeah, I think that's a reasonable summation - I don't think women could vote at all (regardless of landownership) in the US until 1869 when Wyoming let them, but it was on a state by state basis (which meant that states could deny women the right to vote) until the 19th amendment. Wyoming was the first, and New Jersey was also among the first states that allowed women to vote if I recall. I am not super sure about that 1840ish time frame - I'm sure there are records, but googling would have to b…
/r/MensRights03/12/22 12:18 AM
2

You know what... I'm just gonna virtually buy you a beer and imagine we were able to sit and bullshit in a bar over a game of pool or darts, rather than talk politics with you. I (US citizen, living in the US) work daily with people from the UK, and all over the rest of Europe and have lots of conversations with them about things not relating to work. Our perceptions of each others national politics are wildly skewed from the actual reality of day to day life, and I think that's about all I have…
/r/MensRights03/12/22 12:01 AM
9

Andrew Jackson, 7th president, 1829-1837 is widely credited with getting the right to vote for non-landowning men which was handled on a state-by-state basis, and I believe land ownership was no longer a requirement for white men to vote by 1840 maybe, by virtue of the states dropping their requirements that voters be landowners. In 1870, black men could vote with the 15th amendment. Wyoming let women vote in 1869 (this was still on a state by state basis), but by 1920, with the 19th amendment, …
/r/MensRights02/12/22 11:26 PM
0

Do tradcons really suck that hard? Again, the last administration took aim at the absurdity of the unconstitional actions that were going on under Title IX. This administration immediately undid that, and doubled down on giving Title IX more unconstitutional power. Title IX may be the single most important issue facing young men in the MRA world today. Yes, other issues are important too, but none are as directly and specifically hazardous and damaging to men as the implementation of Title IX. Y…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 11:07 PM
1

But what's the point? The best advice I can give is the following, and if I do say so myself, I believe it's fucking solid advice. To thine own self, be true. DO NOT do something that you don't want to do, just because you think the other person wants to do it. Be honest with your partners about where your head is with regard to marriage, kids, and anything else important to the relationship. I can think of no situation where honesty is not the best policy with regard to legitimate concerns abou…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 11:02 PM
1

But all you can do is be honest yourself, right? After that, it's on the other partner.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:28 PM
10

Don't quit yet. Keep records of her conversations with you - time, date, words said, etc. Keep it on hand and when you have a good bunch of evidence about it, and if you're still thinking of quitting, THEN go to HR about it. You may be fired or forced to quit after, but you ALSO may get this bitch properly sanctioned or even fired.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 07:23 PM
7

Heh... well apparently she used the 90k of the money money to pay off gambling debts and kept another 20k just to live on, presumably spending it and not really using it to purchase any assets which could be given to the person she stole from. She'll be sentenced to 28 months in prison. How much she will actually serve, with 5 kids on the outside, is anybody's guess. Any bets on whether or not it will be a "house arrest" situation once the appeal comes in about her 5 kids? Absurd.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 05:31 PM
16

TL;DR: Fuck you for not reading, but also, stop voting for people who norrmalize your marginalization, you dickheads. FFS. So my grandmother, born in 1914, used to say about people: "They don' t even have the sense to be ashamed." Look, you can be however you want to be about all of this, but the bottom line is that this behavior persists because WE let it. Because we elect politicians at the local, state, or federal level who pass laws, who appoint judges, who make policy that entitles women to…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 04:15 AM
33

Attorneys have been doing this for decades. They do it now for everything, not just divorce. If you are a female in business with a male business partner and you want to disenfranchise your male partner and buy his half out on the cheap, just file a false protection from abuse order against him, get him barred from the premises indefinitely. You basically use the law to fire a co-owner of the business. Then use that PFA order as the basis to say he's abandoned the business, and if needed, go to …
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:59 PM
1

The real thing to see will be whether or not any criminal charges of SA come out of any incidental contact (running into them, etc.) with the refs during the match, or any criminal charges result from arguing with a ref... Honestly, y'all need to look at this for what it is - another dare. The world is being dared to complain only so that dissenters can be met with the full force of the SJW/Feminist bludgeoning that they surely deserve if they do complain. /s Further, if these women don't have a…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:51 PM
13

True enough!
/r/MensRights01/12/22 05:44 PM
2

Not surprised... sorry to say.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:49 PM
1

Remember, that because of Title IV-D, if those payments go through the state, the state gets anywhere from $134,000 and $250,000 PER MONTH in federal kickbacks incentives for enforcing child support payment. SOMEONE was going to pay, and the more the better, as far as the state is concerned. ​ Also, don't shed too many tears for Kanye. Chris Rock said: If poor people knew how rich rich people are, there would be riots in the streets... Example: I make a pretty good living, with my annual salary …
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:25 PM
2

Only male engineer in a department run by women? Overworked compared to the rest of the department? I'll bet you're paid less than the rest of the department too. Take your skills elsewhere. These managers will not promote you, and are intentionally setting you up to fail to justify not promoting you. I will say that in a corporate environment, you should legit expect to work 50 hours a week often, probably half the time. That's what performance bonuses are about.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:13 PM
2

Thank you! For months now since I first saw it posted by someone else, I've been shamelessly copying that into threads where it seemed relevant. I never knew the source of it, but am very glad to have that now too.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:08 PM
6

Strengthening Title IX (as an end run around due process and the judicial system) has been a central focal point of this administration. This is not only being unwilling to oppose discrimination against men, this is actively pursuing greater discrimination against men. Meanwhile, the last administration tried to reign Title IX kangaroo courts in and make them actually follow the law. This administration immediately undid those measures and is doubling down on making Title IX activities even more…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:02 PM
70

Why would women be owed anything men aren't? Every time I look around at this whole discussion of male/female relationships, I see lists of what women DO NOT owe men, and what women think men owe them. Men and women owe each other honesty and respect if they're going to be in a relationship, full stop. Partners should discuss relationship and life goals that are important to them and they owe each other honesty about those goals. For instance, if a partner wants to be married, they should discus…
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:44 PM
15

The following is a very informed and highly reusable comment by Karen Straughan in response to a feminist who thinks the many blatant sexists among feminists aren't real feminists. These arguments can also be used to show that ACTUAL feminism is not following the dictionary definition of equality: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, te…
/r/MensRights30/11/22 10:10 PM
15

Painting with a mighty broad brush, aren't ya?
/r/MensRights30/11/22 09:59 PM
2

Right on, brother. I can tell you that while it surely does help if the counselor does have experience going through what you've gone through, a good counselor doesn't require that to give you excellent care. Either way though, I'm glad you have one you're looking to see. That makes me feel better for you. It's probably worth bringing up to your therapist how you're feeling about your own grief being marginalized by others around you. You may not find a way to get others to empathize with you, b…
/r/MensRights30/11/22 09:57 PM
2

First off, I'm so sorry to hear that you're going through this. I can't even imagine your grief. Second, you're not wrong in that nobody considers your feelings on this matter, but I say "fuck them". I think you should go and see a mental health therapist who specializes in grief, and you should see them on your own. Your wife should see one on her own too - preferably a different one than you are going to. If you go as a couple to this grief counseling, you run the very real risk of not having …
/r/MensRights30/11/22 09:11 PM
1

That's what the US State Department says.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 10:10 AM
10

It's a scam.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 01:22 AM
4

Heh. An interesting and unexpected development there. I wonder how much (if anything) this has to do with Sierra Leone ALSO being a predominantly Muslim country.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:12 AM
17

I don't disagree that this situation seems to be devoid of any humanity whatsoever, but, is it the employer or the government that needs to bend the rules here? I am not sure how this works in Europe with family leave (I live in the US). Presumably, companies can in some way seek some sort of recompense from the government, or a tax writeoff for the cost of family leave, but that this recompense/writeoff likely only applies if the family leave is granted under some very specific conditions. This…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 08:04 PM
132

Is this a male only thing or a "didn't work in the job long enough" thing?
/r/MensRights29/11/22 06:16 PM
1

There is always the equation in a man's head that is calculating: "Is this worth it?" When it stops being worth biting his tongue to keep the peace, or when a man decides that he would rather be right than happy, he has to be prepared to leave the relationship. Generally speaking, on most disagreements with a wife/GF, the man is choosing whether to bite his tongue and be annoyed or angry for a couple hours or maybe even a day, vs. speaking his mind and not getting laid for a week or a month.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 01:10 AM
17

The basic premise from women and society, is that men have given full time consent and are full time "ready" for sex, waiting gratefully for women to initiate it or give the "go ahead". In short, consent only matters to women if it's their OWN concent, your consent as a male, is assumed by them.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:49 PM
1

Did you ever have an argument with a woman about something that she insisted was your fault, that actually wasn't your fault? There's no convincing her it wasn't your fault, and in fact, it may even be her fault, but there's no convincing her. Even if you are able to prove to her days or weeks after the fact that the thing that she blamed you for wasn't your fault, she will not actually internalize that new information and in her mind it will always be your fault. You will know that in her mind …
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:36 PM
1

You've come a long way, baby! - Virginia Slims
/r/MensRights28/11/22 03:09 PM
0

Cops are not your friends. They are weapons that the government uses against you.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 04:52 AM
3

Sounds like Massachusetts.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 04:50 AM
4

Ms. Magazine's thought process is that by virtue of having a vagina, every woman on the planet is entitled to the fruits of the labor of every man on the planet. That is their starting position, which is why the magazine never discusses how women are incentivized and paid to initiate and then leave marriages. They consider this the default and a matter of status quo, beyond debate or even discussion. That's how an article like this that talks about fucking house keeping as the pivotal point on w…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 03:45 AM
2

Do you think your GF would tolerate you constantly bashing women? Should she?
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:18 PM
7

It's gaslighting garbage, surrounding some bullshit about "domestic duties." It's all a smoke screen to cover the fact that men experience financial divorce rape which forces them to continue to provide resources that they no longer benefit from for a family in which they no longer have any legal standing or membership. Ms. Magazine is a terrible publication, and if a potential partner regularly reads its offerings, I would consider it a red flag of the most dire and serious nature.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 09:36 PM
15

I just read this post (after some background description of the thread itself) to my wife, who is a clinical mental health therapist. You would be proud of her outrage. I am.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 06:57 PM
5

I mean, if you have to sell belongings to get the money together, in this situation, you fucking do it (and YOU pay the clinic personally). It's a relatively tiny, small price to pay to be rid of this disaster, and may be one of this guy's least expensive life lessons. Jesus H. Christ.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:40 AM
7

Dude... ... ask her how much for half the abortion costs, pay for it, go with her, make sure she goes through with it. In fact, I don't care if you have to pay for all of it, just pay it. Do what you can to get the fuck out of this situation. Reread this post every day until you agree that this situation is a dumpster fire that makes Chernobyl look like a Yankee candle. For fuck's sake...
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:16 AM
8

The whole thing about the male avoiding his responsibility also applies to the female who chose to have the child knowing there would not be any financial support from the father. We have allowed women to avoid their share of responsibility for generations. The sooner people and society start thinking about actual EQUALITY in this regard, the less these situations would happen.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 03:46 PM
17

And they should be. This is by design.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 04:02 PM
3

Because they are incentivized and rewarded for doing so.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 03:49 AM
11

The article is almost painfully devoid of any sort of details or context for this. This sounds like a big nothingburger that only even made news because in some way, someone could claim that females were not treated like princesses.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 07:51 PM
9

Women don't care about men's struggles. They wait at the finish line and pick the winner.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 07:23 PM
0

Or perhaps a suboptimal choice of wording on my part. :)
/r/MensRights18/11/22 06:56 PM
1

That's fair to disagree... the "credit" I gave her is not any sort of applause for forthright activity, and if truth be told, it's a VERY small amount of credit. At least she's not flat out hiding the fact but is considering attempting to be at least somewhat forthright (again, she has ALREADY cheated though, so how decent is she being really?) As you will see in my post above, I already called her out for cheating, and I've posited that she was staying in her relationship for non-genuine reason…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 03:37 PM
1

Damn. I get the extenuating circumstances, but if I did that shit in my non lawyer job, I'd be fired.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 04:16 AM
1

How do you, as a lawyer yourself, let your lawyer fuck around for 6 months?
/r/MensRights18/11/22 04:12 AM
1

It's women seeing things that they want to see, but playing coy about it, pretending they didn't want it in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 04:10 AM
6

The couple is not married per the article.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 10:26 PM
16

Maybe? Hard to say, really. I believe that sexual preference is as varied as there are people on the planet. I also hear about very powerful men who live with long hours of constant, very high stress, wanting to surrender control just to have the relief, but in all honesty I don't really know too much more about it. I very much believe that MANY women in the kink scene have abuse issues in their past, but don't know enough about the men in the scene to make any generalizations.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 09:33 PM
1

IMO, you need to work the Parental Alienation angle. As an attorney, you should know what is required to get the protective order overturned, or you should have colleagues that you can speak to about it. I have no idea how to go about that myself, and would come to someone like you to find out. Aside from that, you're in NYC, you're kind of fucked. I hate it for you, but, that's how it is.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 07:15 PM
7

It's cool that they had a debate, but the 11 people in attendance does tell a certain story, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights17/11/22 07:10 PM
7

Start posting thoughtful, well defined lists of issues on Facebook or whatever social media platforms you use, with titles like: On International Men's Day, let's think about the following: find some memes or infographics that respectfully discuss in legitimate, non-abrasive terms, some of the struggles that men face. Additionally, you can post things like thanking men who build the whole damn planet, thanklessly, for relatively low pay, at risk of personal harm, etc. These men keep your car run…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 07:09 PM
2

They're not REAL feminists though... ​ /SSSSSSSS
/r/MensRights17/11/22 06:40 PM
57

She belongs to the streets! ​ Seriously though, if that's what she wants, then I will give her some credit for considering making the request first, but it's already apparent that she's going to cheat (because she is doing so on one level already) whether or not her partner agrees to it. My suspicion is that she's with the older guy for $$$ reasons and has never had genuine true desire for him.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 05:36 PM
9

Yeah... at the risk of oversharing, I used to be into "the scene" if you will, 25 or so years ago - as a male hetero whiptop. I visited numerous communities and munches in the US, around the Delaware valley and as far away (at the time) as Georgia and Texas. I even attended a fairly huge national convention (featuring kinksters from not only all over the US but also from a few European countries) and it was all the same sort of thing as what you and I both have described. I have no idea what "th…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 05:35 PM
6

Perhaps... but... if your wife/girlfriend says "Oh honey, that shirt really doesn't look good on you, try this one out instead and see what you think", what do you think will happen next, most often? We understand that "and see what you think" when it comes out of our wife's or girlfriend's mouth REALLY means, "see what you think of my reaction to this".
/r/MensRights17/11/22 05:06 PM
11

In general it's true that the double standard exists and it exists with regard to so-called body positivity movements globally. However, relative to advertising, women control around 75% of all household spending in the western world. Advertisers are responding to that and little else.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 04:41 PM
4

It's not "LIKE" that, it IS that. You've hit the nail on the head.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 04:27 PM
25

By rights, the organizers should have just denied the women entry. If a male dominant wants to bring his female submissive into such a meeting, he should be disallowed, or if a male sub's female dominant forbids him from going to that space without her, then that is an issue between the two of them, but the rules should not be changed to allow her to attend. The kink scene likes to act as if it is all about diversity and inclusion, but in reality, diversity and inclusion is only practiced from t…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 04:26 PM
1

Yeah man, you raise another good point. It is HARDER to let a kid fail and guide them through the learning questions and process than it is to just do it for them. It sounds like you were not given the correct parenting/guidance that might have looked something like this: "Now what did you learn?" "How can you do it better next time?" "OK good. Don't worry about messing up now, that's how we all learn, you're doing great. Do it again, but this time, do the things differently that we just talked …
/r/MensRights17/11/22 04:02 PM
2

I would bet, based on the very limited information you've provided here, that you experienced, as a young child, "unintentionally malicious compassion" from your caregiver(s). If I am wrong here, please do not take offense, I mean none. Anyway, what I mean by "unintentinoally malicious compassion" is when a caregiver, out of pure generosity and compassion, does something for you, rather than let you risk failing at it and learning from your mistake in a constructive way. This behavior is EPIDEMI…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 03:44 PM
2

I believe that the majority of the usage of this term "weaponized incompetence" is not actually referring to someone intentionally fucking up a task to get out of doing it in the future, but rather is used to describe men who do a task on their terms, in their time frame, in a way that they prefer. The task gets done, but it gets done when the man wants to do it, the way that the man wants to do it, and this pisses off micromanaging, narcissistic women who then call it "incompetence" because the…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 03:33 PM
140

Women enter men's spaces and then find fault with men being there.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 02:37 PM
6

Heh, well said. Thank you.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 12:59 AM
26

In the aggregate, men tend to suffer more in family court from "divorce rape", especially if there are children involved. This leads men to tolerate a greater level of dissatisfaction with their wife, and might even make them more likely to tolerate infidelity because the alternative is to seek a divorce, which, because there is not likely to be a "fault" attributed to the divorce, will see the man more likely to take a pounding in family court. In the aggregate, women tend to suffer significant…
/r/MensRights16/11/22 03:14 PM
7

If he puts on his resume/cover letter (do people even use cover letters these days? - maybe in his email signature and on the resume?): u/Sadpatient28 (they/them) ​ His chance for an initial interview goes up tenfold.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 03:47 PM
14

Go to the interview wearing a vagina hat.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 03:13 PM
2

You literally restated all the things I said in my post... but... rock on, I guess.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 03:07 PM
5

This is all by design.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 01:37 PM
21

She went on: 'The system has got to change - it can’t be right that I’m in this situation. Heh... how many men a day say this very thing in family courts all over the world?
/r/MensRights15/11/22 01:30 PM
16

Two things: 1) She's got you in her friend zone and feels pretty confident that she can keep you there by shaming you because... 2) You act like a dude that chicks put in the friend zone. There was nothing wrong with asking to sleep with her, but you have to be willing to cut the friendship loose, no apologies, no looking back, if she doesn't go for it. Obviously, the assumption is that you asked her in a decent, clear, direct way. If she gets her ass up in the air about being asked, there's you…
/r/MensRights15/11/22 12:50 AM
3

The "unregulated experts" that are adjudicating parental alienation are probably no less regulated and no more experts than guardians ad litem that tear families apart and begin the process of parental alienation. My wife works with a number of these guardians ad litem (GAL) as part of her therapy practice, and the stories she tells are fucking horror stories. These guardians ad litem are qualified by virtue of the training they get from the office that ALSO adjudicates child support collection …
/r/MensRights14/11/22 11:29 PM
1

Due process is a right.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 01:11 AM
33

The bottom line is that as long as the criminal is a woman, the state thinks it's OK to have that criminal parenting children. What kind of example does that set? I weep for the future.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 09:27 PM
16

In some areas of society it's like this. Reddit is OVERWHELMINGLY a leftist platform, owned by a privately held media company which donates primarily to leftist platforms and politicians. So... what do you think?
/r/MensRights10/11/22 08:50 PM
1

What are they teaching you people? For starters, not that you'd know this, but I am of Jewish heritage (admittedly, Ashkenazi Jew, rather than Israeli Jew). Further, the Jews would be the ABSOLUTE LAST PEOPLE ON THE FUCKING GLOBE that would want to see their national identity erased and melded into the rest of the world - as the globalists would have it with all nations. Despite George Soros being one of the world's most well known globalists, one of the wealthiest people in the world and ALSO a…
/r/MensRights10/11/22 08:39 PM
32

I agree with you that it is not a good reason to avoid prison, however that IS the directive UK courts have been given.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 06:31 PM
78

Hi there OP, I'd like to introduce you to Reddit.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 05:55 PM
1

You need to think about this in terms of a bigger picture. This isn't about the way women in their 20s behave in dating apps (though that is a byproduct of it). If you can look at the way feminist policies have been implemented across the globe attacking and subverting the same institutions in the same ways - at the way organizations like the UN push the feminist agenda - and think that around the world, all these places just came upon these ideas individually and on their own, then I guess I wo…
/r/MensRights10/11/22 05:55 PM
4

Right on. Underrated movie for sure.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 01:32 AM
27

Heh, I've seen a few offerings from that sub. It should be called SJWpseudoscience, or perhaps whatevertheleftsaysiscience... If you question any controls on the experiment, or the data presented, or posit any perspective othen a full Linda Lovelace job of swallowing hook, line, and sinker, whatever is posted there, you get banned. It's not any more legitimately science based than the assclowns that make those tiktok videos trying to show that the different sized drinks are all the same volume.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 11:45 PM
2

Feminism is a tool of globalism. Globalism's "opposite" is nationalism.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:56 PM
2

The issue is the difference between equality and equity.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:48 PM
104

Heh, it's a pile of shit. The bias is real. As for the "male gaze", that's just a word for when the wrong male looks. They're perfectly happy with "the male gaze" when it's the RIGHT guy looking. Most guys are't aware and would be shocked, and most women will NEVER admit how much of their energy they devote to fishing for "the (right) male gaze", but they'll take the (wrong) male gaze too when they can't get the (right) male gaze.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:23 PM
3

I hear you. Just a note to you - it is not a "white" supremacist movement. Yes I know that white women are the most entitled demographic on the planet, but consider the involvement of the UN with the global feminist movement. Look at what's happening in Asia with feminism. It's not limited to whites.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 06:34 PM
1

I will not be surprised if eventually the law allows the egg donor to claim the child that was incubated in the artificial womb, and therefore, receive an order of child support from the father.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 06:18 PM
4

So my undergrad studies were in human physiology with an emphasis on molecular biology. 30 years ago when I got this degree, the Human Genome project was BARELY underway and stem cell research (let alone therapy) was barely more than a pipe dream in the US. Back then, I would have held forth with a LITANY of moral and ethical objections to something like an artificial womb. Today, at age 52, 30 years later, after watching developments in the world with regard to feminism, and understanding it as…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 05:40 PM
39

Ah... so online EARNING rather than online LEARNING... got it! /grin
/r/MensRights09/11/22 05:26 PM
37

The description of this surgery reminds me of the movie Gattaca. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXmU1Z8PNXk
/r/MensRights09/11/22 05:08 PM
532

INB4 - ONLINE LEARNING HURTS WOMYN MOAR!!!
/r/MensRights09/11/22 03:35 PM
3

Sure, but those are years away from being availble.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 02:48 PM
27

Men should rock out with their cock out, or jam out with their clam out, whichever the fuck they want to do... the thing is that we should be afforded the choice.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 01:19 AM
2

Do they really hire people with women's studies degrees?
/r/MensRights09/11/22 01:17 AM
2

Heh...
/r/MensRights09/11/22 12:24 AM
3

Yeah man... you're giving great advice here. I'm going to have my levels checked at my annual physical in January. Thank you!
/r/MensRights09/11/22 12:07 AM
4

Heh, this is a WWT piece here... aimed at emsasculating men and normalizing cuckoldry.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 11:54 PM
12

Here's the thing - whatever body count a woman tells you, double it or triple it, and then consider if you can still live with the new number. If she won't tell you a body count, and you care about it, just move on to someone else. This one can't be trusted or relied upon. You have every right in the world to care about body count of your partner and to discriminate between potential partners on this basis.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 11:47 PM
42

Heh... some women absurdly equate the use of Viagra with birth control for them. Also, I guess these women get "disgusted" because they feel fooled... as nationally testosterone levels of 22 year old men look like those of 65 year old men 30 years ago... Meanwhile, I guess I could understand with boob jobs, facial plastic surgery, tummy tucks, spanx, social media facial filters, makeup and all that shit, how women in general would want to have a man who is 100% natural... /s
/r/MensRights08/11/22 11:41 PM
1

Well damn! Sorry you're having that issue, man, but glad the therapy seems to help you. I did read about nationwide levels dropping a couple weeks back. Glad you reminded me about it. I am 52, no idea what my levels are. I will be curious what, if any causes can be identified, and what reports about that can be trusted.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 11:33 PM
106

Heh... well I suppose when you're used to 100% autonomy in the reproductive rights department, any sort of agency by men feels like oppression.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 11:15 PM
56

The Feminists are just pissed that World War Womyn™ was supplanted by World War Trans™ in 1/20th the time.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 11:09 PM
6

How old are you to be on TRT?
/r/MensRights08/11/22 11:06 PM
401

Feminists would lose their minds if men had a legitimately reversible birth control option that nobody was allergic to and which didn't diminish pleasure for either party, and which they wouldn't know if men were using.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 08:57 PM
46

These kinds of articles are the worst. The current social situation for men is that marriage LITERALLY has more liabilities for them than benefits. The only way to ensure victory for men is to not play the game. Men are admonished for having preferences of women and are told that the choices they make are sexist and bigoted. I'm 52 and grew up in a different time than today's millennials and gen-z kids grew up. I can tell you, if my choices were to get involved with the neighborhood bicycle when…
/r/MensRights08/11/22 05:57 PM
5

For sure, not nursing. But, where else do you go with a gender studies degree (really it should be called women's studies), but into academia?
/r/MensRights08/11/22 01:00 PM
2

I'm not sure why I'd even engage in such a conversation with anyone who would be so intractable about it. If I found myself in such a position, and the woman started mouthing off to me, I'd probably just hold up my hand, palm out, and turn and walk away. I probably have done that a dozen times or more in my life to various women in various situations (though not any quite like what OP describes). I recommend this to anyone who finds themselves face to face with an intolerable harpy.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 07:51 PM
1

Yes (at least more often, and in particular, about these sorts of topics), I do think that.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 08:50 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 08:33 PM
12

Not sure what effect such an order would have had? Would it have affected the financial settlement? If so, it would be an incentive to make up a false allegation. For women there is ALWAYS incentive to make up false allegations. If the allegations had been taken seriously, it would have forced the man out of the home. Once the man is out of the home, the whole scenario changes for divorce. The woman makes the case that the man abandoned the marriage, abandoned the wife, abandoned the home, aband…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:03 PM
1

You have a point I suppose. I do often say: "Don't pay attention to what women SAY, pay attention to what they DO."
/r/MensRights03/11/22 06:18 PM
16

You know, Taylor Swift writes all these songs about breaking up with dudes, dudes breaking up with her... ...but she hasn't written a single song about giving a BJ... ​ Coincidence?
/r/MensRights03/11/22 06:05 PM
9

Thank you both, sorry, typo... fixed now.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 05:55 PM
1

What do you think the odds are they'd get an honest answer from either group?
/r/MensRights03/11/22 05:54 PM
2

Are you implying there is a difference between women and men with regard to the rate of affairs, or that there is a difference between liberal and conservative women with regard to the rate of affairs?
/r/MensRights03/11/22 03:36 PM
51

When MRA speak about female or feminist solipsism, this is another example of it.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 03:32 PM
7

You're not wrong, brother.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 03:27 PM
5

Is anyone surprised?
/r/MensRights03/11/22 03:26 PM
87

A lot of feminists have this idea that career is fulfillment and that family is a distraction from that fulfillment... and a lot of men think of family as fulfillment and career is what they have to do in order to have family. - Karen Straughan
/r/MensRights03/11/22 03:06 PM
392

2020: Journalists killed total: 62 Female journalists killed: 4 (6%) Male journalists killed: 58 (94%) ​ 2021: Journalists killed total: 55 Female journalists killed: 6 (11%) Male journalists killed: 49 (89%) ​ Presumable UN Desired Outcome: Journalists killed total: N Female journalists killed: 0 (0%) Male journalists killed: N (100%) ​ ​ This reminds me of a case that happened some years ago in the UK. Apparently there was some crazy high percentage increase in female fatalities in the workpla…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 02:56 PM
2

Prediction: She's 40 lbs overweight (not in and of itself a terrible thing), with a body count that looks like the white pages. (for you folks too young to remember the phone book, here's a picture:quality(70)/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-tronc.s3.amazonaws.com/public/JFDIZSQW45EXREH6OONJAROAT4.jpg))
/r/MensRights03/11/22 12:17 PM
1

You can link the videos, but you'll only give the guy more clicks/views.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 03:18 AM
27

Block her account and carry on with your life as if she doesn't exist. Her absurd position makes her presence beneath consideration.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 03:10 AM
4

All of these organizations are tied to globalists. Feminism is about the disenfranchisement of men while still retaining the benefit of male industriousness. This serves the globalists well. Hence feminism is a powerful and useful tool.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 02:57 AM
4

The democrats keep expanding Title IX and removing oversight from its implementation.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 08:17 PM
497

These kinds of false allegations LITERALLY happen every fucking day in divorce and custody cases. And yet, we are continually admonished that false allegations are so rare...
/r/MensRights02/11/22 05:58 PM
18

But false accusations are so RARE... and nobody uses the Title IX machine for malice!!! ​ /s
/r/MensRights02/11/22 05:41 PM
1

Still wondering who to vote for in the midterms?
/r/MensRights02/11/22 02:59 PM
3

Agreed with this advice. You won't be promoted from this position. All your lesser perfroming colleagues benefitting from your efforts will all be your boss before you get promoted - AND they will think they deserved it over you, and will continue to promote people that come in behind them, around you, ahead of you. Go elsewhere.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 02:31 PM
24

Your friend's wife will be part of the statistics used to show the pay gap for women with degrees, while your wife's employment will be used to show how women are relegated to lower paid civil servant jobs as a contributor to the pay gap.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 11:45 AM
26

Excerpted from Karen Straughan: Director of the Feminist Majority Foundation and editor of Ms. Magazine, Katherine Spillar, who said of domestic violence: "Well, that's just a clean-up word for wife-beating," and went on to add that regarding male victims of dating violence, "we know it's not girls beating up boys, it's boys beating up girls." Jan Reimer, former mayor of Edmonton and long-time head of Alberta's Network of Women's Shelters, refused to appear on a TV program discussing male victim…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 11:50 PM
7

I found this case particularly interesting, as well as alarmingly and eerily similar to MANY false accusations: I. The Governor’s Academy Arbitrarily Expels James over a Consensual Summer Fling The Governor’s Academy is one such school. The school even tucked the following legalese into its Student Handbook to deny parents even the basic right to force the school to follow its own rules: This Handbook is not intended to create, nor does it create a contract or part of a contract in any way, incl…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 08:00 PM
15

Turn your back on them and avoid them. They are lost and won't change through your influence. They must have the error of their ways proven to them by other women and/or the disastrous policies they espouse. Young minds like simple explanations. The patriarchy is over simplified and as a concept, is carefully curated for easy adoption by young people. Why do you think they hit it so hard in schools and back it up by holding college degrees hostage to its adoption?
/r/MensRights01/11/22 02:34 PM
26

That show is the worst gathering of toxic shithead assholes since MSNBC. As for Will Smith - he should be continually shamed. That man needs a life overhaul. He has adopted a ridiculous cuckold pose with his wife, and then turned his wife (who longs to be more famous than her husband and IS more powerful - CLEARLY) into a sacred cow, making a fool of himself doing her bidding, at his own expense, to defend her from a joke.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 12:43 PM
0

Go read
/r/MensRights01/11/22 02:18 AM
3

They think they'd like it for 24 hours... try 'em for 24 days... see how different things are when their trash starts piling up, gas stations are out of fuel, grocery stores are out of food, utilities (including those in schools) have been off for 2 weeks, exterminators and cops aren't taking care of vermin (yes, plenty of female criminals will show up), lawns aren't being mowed, sewer treatment plants are offline, the internet blinks off, television programming turns into test patterns, etc.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 01:11 AM
7

This is what "feminists" are doing. Honestly, remember who these women were, inform your wife, shame them at the next neighborhood cookout.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 01:06 AM
10

This is teeny bopper misunderstanding of things and exaggerating them hilariously. Yes some of these attitudes were present in Victorian Europe, but not exactly as strict as all of this, and in places like the middle east, but this wasn't like the 1980s or anything. Read the Canterbury tales (written in 1392) for some better ideas of what was happening in this regard.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 12:55 AM
2

Don't listen to what they SAY, watch what they DO.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 07:08 PM
13

You need the fuckin' DNA test. Get it done.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 07:06 PM
1

If enough people who think their vote is "wasted" all vote anyway, it might not be "wasted" after all. The only wasted vote is one not cast.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 07:05 PM
75

Becoming? Also, not that slowly, brother.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 06:32 PM
72

I agree these women are taking this quite far. They should be ashamed.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:50 PM
6

I took her speaking about "sex outside marriage" to mean sex with someone to whom you have no intention of ever marrying (while not being married yourself), rather than having sex with someone outside of your marriage (presumably without any say from your partner). In other words, it sounds like she is saying it's her choice to have sex without the prospect of marriage weighing into it, not that it's her choice to commit adultery. Though technically, it would be her choice to commit adulttery as…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:21 PM
5

Very little.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:06 PM
5

So the article you link says that false accusations occur 2 to 10% of the time. Let's assume you did not misrepresent that intentionally (because why would you lie, right?). 1 false accusation in 10 is astronomically high, especially given what the ramifications are for the victim of a false accusation. If we split the difference in the claim and call it 6% of the time for false accusations, that's a bit more than 1 in 20. If I had 1 chance in 20 to win the lottery, I'd surely play. If I had 1 c…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:00 PM
183

This is ridiculous and is nothing more than an attempt to crybully men even farther into second class citizenship. This article says: Don't come near women unless EXPLICITLY invited. If a woman is occupying a space, a man is forbidden that space until the woman vacates it. If a woman moves near you, you are obliged to move away and yield the space to her. Don't ask women if you can approach them or if you can share a space with them because you are not to speak to a woman until or unless spoken …
/r/MensRights31/10/22 04:38 PM
30

It's probably NOT that... Maybe 1 or 2 people said something that the guy then RESTATED, implying words they never said, making mentally gymnastic leaps that they never intended, so that he could misattribute this meaning to what they said. This is a common tactic, and a shabby one. It doesn't hold water in any legitimate debates because it relies on a series of logical fallacies and lies in order to pull it off. Watch the 30 minute Jordan Peterson interview with the feminist journalist (and I u…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 03:30 PM
19

If you could ever determine the legitimacy of it so as to make a bet, the smart money would be on women cheating as much or more than men. The thing is that women are pretty much hard wired to not admit to these things unless caught red handed, so even studies with blind/anonymous results list honesty in self-reporting as a potential problem with their data. The REASONS men and women cheat are very different, and depending on how you define "cheat" (i.e. emotional relationship vs. physical relat…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 02:26 PM
1

So men decided what the pay scale for various roles would be, and not the market and the scarcity of the skills required to do those jobs? Have women spent a lot more time than men in the workforce doing the most dagerous, dirty, physically demanding jobs for low pay too? As for the choices women make, you clearly didn't read my post, you just reject the thought that it couldn't be men's fault... However, here's what we see: ​ Women tend, in the aggregate, to be interested in careers/vocations/j…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 01:51 PM
153

"It turns into a community which has very different view, I think, of what's right and what's wrong. They talk very openly about their views of women, and the rules around rape. It's OK to rape women of a particular race," he [John Della Volpe] claimed. I want to know exactly who and how many said that raping women was OK if they were a certain race... My suspicion is that it's a flat out lie and that nobody said that.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:56 PM
9

Men's rights aren't on the radar of really any political parties at the moment. The Dems say that they want to make the draft be non-gender segregated, but the Dems also say things like women suffer the most in war (and put forth policies based on these sorts of lies), and yet they keep warmongering. Dems keep expanding Title IX to give it more and more reach and less and less constitutional oversight. Meanwhile Reps don't really seem to care other than to adopt a simp/chivalrous position of not…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:53 PM
1

So your assertion is that in the current day, in western industrialized nations, that there are significant cases of people with EXACTLY THE SAME performance, doing EXACTLY THE SAME jobs at the same companies but getting paid differently based solely on their gender? That is your premise, is it?
/r/MensRights31/10/22 11:53 AM
1

It's cute how the result of women's choices is, in your mind, men's fault. Do you idiots even hear yourselves?
/r/MensRights31/10/22 11:45 AM
11

And here comes the end game.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 11:57 PM
3

This is by design. The people peddling this lie want everyone to think it's about women being paid less for the same job, because that's easy to be outraged about, right? However, they know there is no empirical data to support this and that under any reasonable scrutiny, this claim falls apart. So now they couch it as a "pay gap", which speaks to lifetime earnings, and they conflate the same shitty arguments about the non-existent wage gap, because they are trying to stoke the outrage while hid…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 05:51 PM
2

GTFO again. Everyone knows the salary issues and benefits and liabilities of their careers. Choices are made with eyes as wide open as they can be. CHOICES. Take your Marxist bullshit somewhere else.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 05:37 PM
3

It's not my assignment, but like you, I came here to help the guy with it. Looking forward to really digging into what you've written.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 05:35 PM
1

Yes 401(k) with some match. Teachers have this as well, IN ADDITION to their pension.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 05:34 PM
5

Think of it another way: if employers could get away with paying a woman less for the same job (wage gap), there would be no men employed, period.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 05:32 PM
1

What does this have to do with women's choices to earn less money in their lifetime than men?
/r/MensRights29/10/22 04:51 PM
1

It's better than the pension I get, which is zero.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 04:50 PM
2

I have skimmed what you wrote and appreciate all the thought you've put into your response. Right now I don't have the time or bandwidth to fully digest this and respond to you appropriately. So I will humbly beg your pardon, thank you, and also get back to you when I have the time to give this the effort it deserves.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 04:48 PM
2

Average nursing salaries: Nurse Salary (RN, APRN) - Average Pay by State https://nursinglicensemap.com/resources/nurse-salary/ As for teachers, I know a lot of them, grade school to high school to college profs. They don't work any longer hours than I do, but they do work 3 fewer months a year than I do. For this, they get a pension, and their benefits are a good or better than most private sector packages. As for your living wage thing, that has nothing to do with a pay gap. Stay focused FFS.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 04:41 PM
1

Private and charter schools have direct oversight from the people who choose to pay for their services. Public schools have far less direct oversight from the consumers of their product.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 04:35 PM
1

I'm not sure which term/study you are referring to. It could be several. Can you elaborate please?
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:28 PM
4

For teachers, did you factor in pensions? Benefits packages? Time off? No, you didn't. Most private sector jobs have no pensions anymore. Most families I know where one spouse works in the private sector and the other is a teacher use the teacher's insurance for their family. I don't know anyone working in the private sector that takes the whole summer off, but I sure know a lot of private sector employees that work just as long or longer hours per day as teachers do. As for nurses, that is an a…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:24 PM
4

You are free to pay MORE taxes without oversight than what is required.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:15 PM
5

If teachers don't like it, they can leave the field. Ask yourself why they stay. Also, ask yourself what policies and administration is responsible for the teacher crisis right now.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:05 PM
5

Fine. But be advised of the terms used and what they really mean. The point still stands regardless of what terms you use, as long as you use them consistently.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 02:52 PM
0

GTFO with your living wage BS. Teachers and nurses do very well for having a bachelor's degree and in teachers case, for only working 9 months a year.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 02:36 PM
56

Reposting my comment from the other day: You can end this discussion in 5 minutes flat as long as you make sure a couple ground rules are followed. When people hear the information below, they start trying to disingenuously make the argument about a "wage gap", and keep bouncing between the meanings of each term, but not honestly discussing it. This is because the information below represents significant cognititive dissonance for people who believe there is some patriarchial conspiracy to keep …
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:58 PM
1

Sort of. The video was long on examples and short on reasons. He said at the beginning that he thought it was because we are conditioned, and have evolved to seek the attention of women.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 12:15 PM
42

Hard to imagine this as anything other than some Clockwork Orange type of brainwashing.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 12:54 AM
3

You make such a strong and well informed case here, I can't imagine why it didn't fly with your parents.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 10:07 PM
1

Right, and I'm trying to be sensitive to the fact that OP and others are upset by it, but what I really think needs to happen is that OP needs to really look into what it is specifically that is upsetting him so much and work through that (I spoke to my counselor wife about this thread and she advised the same thing and told me "I guess you really ARE paying attention to me when I talk about things I see in the office.) If you had sex with a biological female that had a hysterectomy, that she di…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 09:51 PM
1

I didn't say shocked, I said I loathe that people would become violent about such a thing. Other than a trans woman overpowering you and trying to actually rape you with that dick, I just find it really ugly to imagine someone getting violent upon discovering that they were in bed with a pre-op trans woman. Angry? Sure. Freaked out? Sure. Asking the person to get dressed and leave? Certainly not unreasonable, but violent? That's ugly in the extreme.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 09:40 PM
3

That's what I meant. I'll look when I have more time.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 07:06 PM
5

I haven't looked, will his post history show up if I search?
/r/MensRights28/10/22 07:05 PM
7

I haven't looked, will his post history show up if I search?
/r/MensRights28/10/22 07:05 PM
3

I guess OP should have asked beforehand, to avoid this problem. Maybe... but how would you know to even ask? I would think that for pre-op trans women, it would be VERY important to their own safety to inform people before going home with them that there's a dick under that skirt (and I find it loathsome beyond words that someone would react violently to another human being like that, but the reality is what it is). Seriously though, right? If she was attractive enough for him to want to get int…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 07:00 PM
1

Nah, I dig... it's just difficult to be both compassionate to the struggle that OP is having, while at the same time, not feeling like it would bother me at all if I were in his shoes. You just want people to be happy, right? While at the same time, you don't necessarily agree with them about things that upset them and wish they weren't upset while still acknowledgeing that they are upset and that their feelings are valid.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 06:47 PM
-3

I mean, sort of... but... it's pretty difficult for me to even acknowledge or care about the distinction - again - I respect opinions that differ from mine - I'm just saying... I guess it's important to understand sex in terms of whether or not it has to do with the "parts", or with the "person". Do we fuck a body part, or a person? Anyway, it all gets into a pretty deep meta realm here, when FOR ME, it seems like NBD, ESPECIALLY since there was only one penis in the room... I guess I'll concede…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 06:37 PM
1

Thank you, brother!
/r/MensRights28/10/22 06:31 PM
9

OK so... off the bat here from me - I'm not making any judgement about you or her or any of this. To me it sounds purely like you had a presumably enjoyable one night stand with someone who happened to be a genetic male. OBJECTIVELY speaking here - there's nothing "gay" about this. I admit I am somewhat surprised that her post surgical sexual organs were indiscernible to you from a biological female's. FOR ME: I am unsure if I feel like it should have been incumbent on this person to tell you th…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 06:29 PM
3

Ah sorry, I wasn't clear... I was asking for examples of when the courts have said that due to the lies of the man (about the condom/vasectomy/STD, etc.) that the woman was legally unable to give consent, and therefore theman was guilty of SA. My point being that if such a thing is upheld by courts, then it could potentially be argued that under the law, lying about paternity could also be viewed the same way.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 06:05 PM
3

Well, I guess that's the end of that.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:48 PM
1

Ah, sorry, I couldn't say. Never saw the episode and am not super clear on it based on your explanation. Apologies, I got nothin' for ya.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:47 PM
3

Thank you!
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:38 PM
29

INB4 LEGIONS of pound me too claims against Elon Musk start showing up.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:22 PM
10

Yep, it's all about Title IV-D of the social security act. This particular addition to the law has done more to erode the nuclear family than LBJ's welfare expansion did in the 1960s - and that's saying something.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:21 PM
3

You're a horrible person and you should set an example to your children by bleeding out in front of them, courtesy of your own firearm Do what now?
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:14 PM
3

So is that upheld in law? I'm not challenging you, I just want to know. Are there examples of court judgements showing that the law views these sorts of lies as assault?
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:11 PM
44

I don't know the account in question... can you point to any of their content that you found particularly important?
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:07 PM
6

I haven't watched the video... but I'm going to pre-emptively guess that the reason why men beat each other down and uplift women is that those men who do that think it will get them laid. Now... to watch the video and see how accurate my prediction is.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:06 PM
8

I think there is likely to be merit in your assertion that it is sexual assault, though I am not clear enough on what the law defines as sexual assault when it is the man lying (about using a condom, about being infertile, about having an STD, etc.). Conceptually though, there ought to be legal consequences for knowingly lying about this sort of thing, or even about lying about the possibility of it.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:05 PM
5

Right on, yep. Well, as I typed my above comment, I was thinking SPECIFICALLY about France and what you mentioned. So I will amend my statement slightly - YOU in particular might not be surprised at how often the state is complicit in the fraud, but many would be.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:03 PM
1

A win for sanity in a morass of insanity. Good job, Dearborn dads!
/r/MensRights28/10/22 04:59 PM
15

Aside from wanting some clarity on what you mean by the term "rapist", I would generally agree. Here's the kicker though - you might be shocked how frequently state governments (not just in the US) are complicit in the fraud.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 04:54 PM
46

Let's face it, women who commit paternity fraud ALWAYS KNOW that there is AT LEAST some chance they are committing fraud, if they aren't 100% certain they are committing fraud. If a woman is such a total piece of shit scumbag asshole that she is willing to steal money from a man she knows isn't the father of her child, what makes you think she'd have any remorse about letting him rot in jail for non-payment? This is another example of what MRAs mean when they talk about female solipsism. In thes…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 04:26 PM
2

I know about the Lucy episode, didn't know about the DVD episode. So... what was your question? Whether or not we'd seen it, or whether or not the social expectation was for him to pay...? I guess I'm just unclear on what you are asking.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 04:22 PM
5

THIS is what "equity" looks like when carried out to its inevitable end.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 03:22 PM
21

You can end this discussion in 5 minutes flat as long as you make sure a couple ground rules are followed. When people hear the information below, they start trying to disingenuously make the argument about a "wage gap", and keep bouncing between the meanings of each term, but not honestly discussing it. This is because the information below represents significant cognititive dissonance for people who believe there is some patriarchial conspiracy to keep women down. There is a CLEAR difference b…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 02:18 PM
6

That's gold. Thank you for posting this.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:16 PM
1

Dude, women don't want to do those jobs, no matter how many people stare at their tits.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:45 AM
3

Oh. Thought you were the guy saying that 9 out of the top 10 causes of death were suffered by more men than women.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:44 AM
3

Not at all. Unless I mistook your initial post.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 12:43 AM
3

I think it would be fantastic if construction and other dangerous job industries would make concerted efforts to entice women, and the other traditionally female dominated fields made the same concerted efforts to recruit men.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 08:29 PM
79

Women dress the way they do so people will look. They just don't like it when the guy they want to look doesn't, and the guy they don't want to look does.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:49 PM
10

I have never in my life heard a woman say: "I would love to live out my lifelong ambition of walking the high steel, but the guys keep staring at my tits, so I guess I'll just have to settle for a CEO job."
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:48 PM
1

Oh damn, I thought she kept his name out of it. Well I guess it's just more threats then. If she doesn't press charges, he needs to sue for defamation. Of course, she will then press charges...
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:34 PM
11

In other words: My people are talking to his people looking to see how much his people want to pay to avoid a pound me too accusation that goes to court.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:22 PM
1

Source? I'd like to refer to this as illustration.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:18 PM
2

Heh... only a third? Seems underestimated.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 05:25 PM
1

If a man is getting a vasectomy because Roe v. Wade has been overturned, then, to be frank, I'm glad they're out of the gene pool. I promise you that if you are doing this as a young man, it will only be another disqualifying factor for you in the future if you are looking for a LTR with a woman. Women looking to actually have children will disqualify you from consideration for a LTR. Further, depending on your reasonsing for getting the vasectomy, some women will view you as a simp or too irres…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 05:13 PM
1

Agreed - this sort of low effort posting is pretty much crap.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 05:03 PM
6

This is all gaslighting and bullshit. My little sister used to do this crap when she was 9. She would say some outlandish thing about me. If I argued that it wasn't true, she would say "It must be true, look how defensive you're getting". If I just ignored her, she'd say "It must be true, you have nothing to say in your defense about it." My sister is 51 years old, this tells me that they have been teaching females to argue like this for at least 40+ years. This is the same shit - damned if you …
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:31 PM
57

Q: Do you know why married men die before their wives? A: Because they want to. Seriously though, it's no surprise that in the aggregate men live shorter lives than women when we consider: Men work more dangerous occupations. Men have more societal expectation for support and stressful working conditions. Significantly less is spent on men's health (mental and physical) Suicide rates for men FAR outstrip those for women and nobody seems to give a shit. (This really goes along with item 3, but I'…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:16 PM
5

Wow, holy shit!
/r/MensRights27/10/22 02:59 PM
5

WTF is this?
/r/MensRights26/10/22 06:24 PM
1

Horseshit study comparing apples and oranges.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 05:52 PM
2

It's hard to know what you can personally do without knowing if you're married, have children, or anything else about you... so... with that said... here is what I think is maybe the single most important piece of advice I can give you: Very often people are willing to execuse or justify behaviors based on sexist beliefs and positions. People are willing to turn a blind eye to biased behavior based on the sex of the people involved. When you see this occurring test it in your head by reversing t…
/r/MensRights25/10/22 05:49 PM
13

Dude, there are women who call Brad Pitt "gross". Some will, some won't, so what. The girl was 100% responding to you sending her an unwanted advance while you were dating someone else. She probably only half believes you did it by accident, if that much. She was telling you "gross" so that you would know that she does not want any more "accidents" like this from you.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 05:43 PM
1

Aww shucks... thank you, brother! Actually I don't know how old you are, so I can't say where I was when you were in your 20s. In my 20s, I was busy fucking some things up, and getting lucky with others, and learning that my dad wasn't full of shit. My 20s were the 1990s and they were nowhere NEAR the minefield that this decade is for guys in their 20s.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 05:35 PM
8

If a woman needs to be told by her partner that she's spending too much time speaking 1 on 1 alone with other men, then she's either not that into you, or she's shit testing you. If she comes back with: "you can't tell me not to speak to my friends" when you're just asking her not to spend significant time alone 1 on 1 with another dude, then cut her loose.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 04:08 PM
10

I am probably a pretty similar age as your dad (I'm 52). I will tell you also: The older I get, the smarter I realize my dad is.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 03:56 PM
16

You're going to hate my answer, but I promise you I am giving it with compassion and sincere, honest concern for you behind it. However, the things I am about to say to you aren't going to feel very good to hear. I am assuming you're speaking about dating women approximately your age or younger - you said you are 26. Women in this age group are a nearly unmitigated disaster. Some of this is about prefrontal cortex development, some of it is about the current state of institutional entitlement of…
/r/MensRights25/10/22 03:51 PM
6

So it's time for some radical acceptance: That means that you don't have to like what's going on, but you do have to accept it - if only so that you can function and choose a way to move forward that is best for you. Again, you don't have to like it, but you do have to accept the reality of your situaiton. So accountability and abortion discussions aside, you're basically screwed here. The law doesn't care, even if you could make a case for theft of your sperm, you will still be on the hook for …
/r/MensRights25/10/22 01:52 PM
4

If your wife goes on there and makes the case that your failing health is harder on her than it is on you because your inability to work and be productive is hurting her due to the resources you're not providing for her, the admins would leave it up. Further, you'll probably see record breaking donations to any sort of gofundme.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 05:20 PM
1

Biden is gonna be "fighting for abortion" for the next 6 years to help him stay in office. For the next two years...
/r/MensRights21/10/22 08:26 PM
6

On the face of it, it doesn't seem that unreasonable of a thing to do, but of course, it all depends on the content of the resume, which I can't be bothered to look into.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 08:22 PM
2

Right on, brother. Yeah, I think /s is the standard markup... but adding caps and multiple "S" to it emphasizes the point - at least that's my understanding of it as well... it was a newish thing to me around here as well not too long ago.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 08:11 PM
1

The "/SSSSSS" at the end of my post indicates sarcasm... perhaps you could call it "gallows humor" if you like. Maybe you misunderstood the intent of my post. Hint: I was saying that the femosphere is utterly solipsistic with regard to the suffering they create with their lies, and can't even understand what they created in this situation and are so entirely self absorbed and entitled that they'd view this scenario not from a frame of the ruined young man, but from their own frame of missing out…
/r/MensRights21/10/22 08:07 PM
1

It's back there, embedded in the text of the post this time, instead of placed on its own outside the text... not sure exactly how this link was deleted from my post.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 03:36 AM
1

I'm telling you that this will all backfire soon.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 03:05 AM
48

In the end, this particular disaster effects women the most. After all, some future wife of this guy lost out on the potential resources he could have provided as an Ivy League graduate... so... women suffer the most here from this patriarchial miscarriage of justice perpetrated by the patriarch of the family against his son. /SSSSSSSSS
/r/MensRights21/10/22 03:00 AM
2

https://www.wionews.com/world/staring-at-women-for-long-can-land-you-in-jail-warns-uk-police-471822
/r/MensRights21/10/22 02:49 AM
1

Ah, sorry... it's when you get on public transportation which travels on the streets.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 02:35 AM
7

I'm pretty sure that is the default presumption under the law in any country that even has laws about this. However, if either parent raises an objection, this may not be the presumption in those countries with laws about this and paternity testing is readily available. In some states in the US, paternity tests may not be enough to deter the state from ordering child support to the father who is proven NOT to be the father. HOWEVER, in places like France, no paternity test is allowed by law with…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 08:26 PM
11

If a woman is willing to take the word of people she doesn't know over you, without talking to you about it, maybe you should rethink whether she's worth your time.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 08:00 PM
9

I couldn't agree more. I say again - radical ideologies cannot tolerate public discourse because public discouse destroys radical ideologies. Right now, you have to look at the forces at work to quell public discourse. OK feminists themselves - of course. Is big tech working to control the narrative and silence public discourse? Yup. Is the media working to control the narrative and silence public discourse? When haven't they? How about the government - are they working to silence public discour…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 07:50 PM
38

Here is my absolutely true post in that thread: I knew I was going to ask my girlfriend to marry me and was going to get my great-grandmother's engagement ring. It had a sapphire in what is called a "miner's cut" - apparently it was popular in the late 19th and early 20th century. My sister rescued it from scheming greedy relatives in the dust-up between my extended family members when my grandmother passed away (story for another thread), and told me that it was mine for whenever I found someon…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 07:20 PM
33

ALL radical ideologies destroy public discourse. They need to do that in order to exist because public discourse destroys radical ideologies.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:00 PM
2

I was aware of Thatcher and May. I just thought the rhetoric was telling about the relative state of affairs.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:01 PM
6

Fair point.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:59 PM
6

This article is passive aggressive horseshit. Ignore it completely.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:53 PM
2

It's ironic to me that it breaks down to sounding like a pack of coyotes or hyenas at the end. All those white women in Europe must be REALLY frustrated with their oppressed position in life. I'm glad they have these hyena choruses to work out all of their pent up rage... /s
/r/MensRights20/10/22 03:34 PM
2

Thank you all for your patience with me and my lack of understanding of how UK politics actually work, and I am sorry to hear what sounds like some depressing shit. Damn.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:57 PM
26

Hilarious. Did any of you ever see the movie "As Good As It Gets"? Pretty decent movie, for its time, all things considered. It's probably 20 years old or more by now. One of the main characters in the movie is played by Jack Nicholson. He's a romance novel writer and is visiting his publisher in this scene. He's kind of a giant asshole with his own set of neuroses. The secretary is super excited to meet him as she is a big fan of his books and apparently REALLY loves the way he portrays the wom…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:49 PM
14

The policy of suspension pending investigation is a travesty and one would be a fool to think it didn't play a part in false accusations.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 01:32 PM
5

This just in from the same "scientists": Fathers responsible for SIDS, childhood lukemia, and bedwetting as well. Recommend fathers should not be allowed contact with children under 18, fathers should just work alone and live separately and send money.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:55 PM
16

I gotta ask, are you guys actually subscribed to the NY Times? This article is behind a paywall for me.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 05:59 PM
-33

Heh... fuck the fucking fuck out of that fucking bitch and her stupid fucking request and anyone who thinks her request was reasonable.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 05:31 PM
6

ALL political parties have gone full crazy with the current polarization of the electorate.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:49 PM
2

So this woman got 2 years in prison for YEARS of systematic physical abuse. Imagine if just ONE TIME, her husband had hauled off and cracked her one across the mouth. Just once, if he knocked her flat on her ass while he was defending himself from her punches and kicks and knife attacks. I'm not talking about him knocking out her teeth, or breaking her jaw, or giving her a concussion. I'm talking about a simple explanation to her with the necessary object lesson, that her violent behavior would …
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:28 PM
1

The title of her speech: Feminism: Socialism in Panties Finally someone puts it out there - of course it would be Karen Straughan. Oh man, this is really gonna chap the asses of the wannabe Che Guevaras around here. I can see they're already at work downvoting.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:05 PM
1

Agreed entiely on everything you said. With the story as presented, assuming the person who conveyed it did a complete job, it's impossible to conclude that the men harrassed her. The thing about stories like this is that they RARELY are complete or have enough details to understand whether the complaint is legitimate. The PROBLEM comes when we don't actually investigate before leaping to very damning conclusions, and that's really a BIG problem when someone is punished or suffers consequences a…
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:30 PM
4

That's what I'm saying. You could call it discriminatory, but assuming that the supervisor was enforcing a policy on her specifically, BECAUSE she was female, that is likely to be viewed as sexual discrimination if not sexual harrassment.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 06:37 PM
21

So I have a few questions about this: Is it ONLY the females that are allowed to wear shorts? Do men have this option? If not, that is a discriminatory practice against men. If ALL of the women are admonished to not wear shorts, while men are allowed to wear them, that is a discriminatory practice against women. If the shorts in question were allowed as part of the uniform, were they in keeping with official uniform standards? The men looking at her (if indeed that even happened - as the OP did …
/r/MensRights18/10/22 05:42 PM
7

Only fathers need to pay to see and/or have custody of their children.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 08:49 PM
36

A lot of feminists have this idea that career is fulfillment and that family is a distraction from that fulfillment... and a lot of men think of family as fulfillment and career is what they have to do in order to have family. - Karen Straughan
/r/MensRights17/10/22 08:42 PM
5

My father used to say: Opinions are like assholes, everybody's got one, and they all stink. The thing is that you can't regulate opinions. All you can really do is regulate the way people are treated, and regardless of your opinion, you shouldn't really treat people with anything short of basic human decency. As an MRA, I can certainly recognize that gay or bi men may face challenges related to being gay or bi that I don't face, but I can recognize that being gay or bi might exacerbate some of t…
/r/MensRights17/10/22 06:34 PM
4

I don't care what they wear, but when we are required to wear long pants into the office, I don't want to hear shit from the women wearing gauzy tank tops and short skirts who think the fucking air conditioning is too cold.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 05:54 PM
48

The field of psychology is dominated by women. The majority of actual mental health care therapists are women. They are fully indoctrinated in feminist dogma throughout their educational path to becoming qualified as a therapist. What kind of therapy do you think they're going to give you as a man if you show up? They're going to teach you all sorts of coping mechanisms to be happy and find fulfillment in your role as provider and cuckold.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 05:47 PM
2

Onlyfans is going to be a mess. Right now, if you don't think Onlyfans is cool, you're an incel, tradcon, spurned neckbeard, etc. You are being shamed for not encouraging women to earn a very good income while freely expressing (and profiting from) their sexuality. Every conceivable breath or uttering of dissent about Onlyfans represents a potential threat to women extracting resources from men. They WILL fight this tooth and nail. In a couple years or maybe less, people will start seeing young …
/r/MensRights17/10/22 05:16 PM
2

I have NO ISSUE whatsoever with women doing these sorts of trades jobs. Obviously, I assume that they're able to do them with the same skill as the average man doing the job. I don't care if you aren't strong enough to lift 200 lbs of bricks at once, but you need to be fast enough to get as many put down in a day, as straight and plumb and correctly as a man does with the same amount of help that a man has. As for the rest of the article, I think it's just a nothingburger. As was noted below, wh…
/r/MensRights17/10/22 04:02 PM
2

A lot of this is just dumb... I would bet my house that the supposed "pay gap" in Australia is related to women's choices and NOT, as people like to assume, about women being paid nearly 15% less than men get paid for the same job with the same qualifcations and performance. The reality is surely like everywhere else: women work fewer hours and fewer years, at typically lower paying jobs. Generally we know that women (in the aggregate) tend to be interested in vocations dealing with PEOPLE, and …
/r/MensRights17/10/22 02:23 PM
1

This is all by design.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 10:41 PM
1

Well perhaps yes, but if that guy contested the order of child support (citing genetic reality that he was not the father), the courts would have STILL gone after the donor. Protracted legal battles would have ensued but I guarantee the state would have made SOMEONE pay as much a possible, thereby guaranteeing themselves the largest amount of federal kickback money. That's what this is all about - started making money (not just avoiding costs, but financially benefitting more than what they avoi…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 09:38 PM
1

Well the state would only have standing to go after the GF if she had adopted the kid, which you say was illegal in that state in 2012. Again, the guy did not do the donation through a sanctioned facility. I'm not saying it's right or that I think it should be that way, but that's the way it is.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 05:04 PM
2

If a woman steaks your sperm and uses it, you WILL be paying child support ordered by the state and any back owed child support for the duration of the very long and protracted and EXPENSIVE legal battle you will face to get that stopped. You will also not be repaid any of the child support money that the state stole from you IF you are successful in getting the child support order overturned.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 04:30 PM
1

It's been legal in all 50 states since 2017 at least.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 04:24 PM
2

Did the girlfriend legally adopt the child?
/r/MensRights16/10/22 02:17 PM
3

I remember the groundwork for it being laid for us in grade school with weekly current events in which we had to identify things like "emotionally charged language" and "bias" and so forth on news articles that we would pick out as students and bring in and discuss as a class.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 09:33 PM
11

Indeed. Well said.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 09:31 PM
15

There is no question that ctitical thinking training is given VERY short shrift in modern western education.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 07:30 PM
2

You're welcome and I absolutely do think that, and have thought the very same for 35 years since I read the Thoreau quote (listened to Pink Floyd for years before that).
/r/MensRights14/10/22 07:20 PM
2

There have been plenty of cases where the woman didnt work and the state still goes after the working parent for child support. One of the moms is still working. Why do you think the state chose to go after the male sperm donor instead of the working ex gf? Because he could pay and he was the actual father of the child and didn't use a licenced sperm donation facility and licensed physician, giving the state a loophole to use to get their Title IV-D kickback bucks.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 07:18 PM
86

Simple reason: because they think it wil get them laid. The white knight/simp/mangina reflex is strong and actively cultivated institutionally and relentlessly from the earliest age that institutional interaction occurs.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 06:48 PM
2

Yeah maybe... but if she doesn't have any money, the state isn't exactly getting maximum benefit now, are they? You need to put the idea out of your head that the state does this "in the interests of the child(ren)". They do it because it's free money and to benefit themselves. This is BILLIONS of dollars in federal kickbacks annually across the nation. The MORE money the state oversees the transfer of through child support, the more they get back in federal incentives. It behooves them to NOT a…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 06:25 PM
5

This isn't a newly realized perspective. The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. - Henry David Thoreau - Walden - 1854 Yes this was, in part, about men living dutiful, urbanized, docile, civilized lives, but is this not what Kerouac was speaking about as well? Isn't this what feminists picture as their ideal "modern man"? This is not the man feminists want to be fucking, mind you, this is the man they want to provide for them when they get home from fucking the exciting guy.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 05:30 PM
2

This is why the Dems in the US have loudly adopted the feminist and other "woke" disaster policies to their platform. Meanwhile, even here, "tradcon" remains a bigger insult than "cuck". Go figure.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 05:08 PM
1

You have to define what you mean by "suffering". Do you mean suffering from not enough food? Medical treatment? Sanitary conditions? Being subject to violence? and this is why: Right now feminists love to say shit like: "Women suffer most in war." They say this despite the fact that the vast majority of war deaths/casualties (95%+) are male. The feminists will ignore these death statistics and point to the fact that after a war, societies are rebuilding, all the men are dead or injured and the w…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 01:32 PM
2

Seriously, dude? You post a google link as the title with no description? Lowest of low effort.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 01:22 PM
3

You are correct that the guy was not protected because it was a "private" sperm donation - i.e. not done through a licensed facility with a licensed physician overseeing it. However, you are probably not entirely correct with your assertion that it was about Kansas not wanting to acknowledge same-sex parentage. It was probably MORE about the fact that Kansas has a vested interest in ordering child support not only because it saves THEM from having to pay for a child with state money (welfare, et…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 01:18 PM
5

Also consider that if you are thinking of banking some sperm and then getting a vasectomy with the later understanding that vasectomies are nowhere near as "reversible" as people think they are, that you might want to be married and have kids via IVF, that's a great plan. But read the summary below of a case that I read about here not too long ago: Guy is married and has to undergo medical treatment for some illness that had a chance of making him sterile. He banks some sperm against this eventu…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 12:57 PM
12

There's a lot of nothingburger here. This is celebrity gossip about the kinds of things that all celebrities have done since there has been such a thing as a celebrity. I'm not excusing it, per se, but saying that it's par for the course. Further, the women coming forward aren't "injured" in any way, shape, or form, but I am sure they WILL feel "injured" if their online personas don't blow up as a result of the publicity. The way this is being couched, it's either some "hail Mary" to try to resc…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 12:36 PM
2

Aint that the fuckin truth!
/r/MensRights14/10/22 12:05 PM
6

All the more reason to get your shit wired tight and just move forward making as few waves as you can. I mean it. You are extremely vulnerable right now with regard to your future.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 07:09 PM
7

Heh, she's a she. Her name is Karen Straughan. Look her up on YouTube.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 07:05 PM
31

Listen, my dude, you're 14. These teachers are gatekeepers to your future. It's good that you're aware of the hypocrisy going on around you right now, but at your age, in your position, no good can come of you rocking the boat. These women can derail your entire educational goals at this point. I HIGHLY recommend that you just figure out whatever claptrap nonsense BS they want you to spout back at them in order to get the grades you need. They will NOT give you those grades unless you agree with…
/r/MensRights13/10/22 06:08 PM
6

I don't know anything about the movie... got a link to a summary or review or something...?
/r/MensRights13/10/22 04:56 PM
4

This is the fucking worst... the ABSOLUTE worst! It's all good to have "Women-only" spaces, but somehow, a "Men-only" space is not allowed? GTFO. There is no appreciable reason for this dichotomy. Men who simp and white knight for women by selling out these men's spaces like that should be abolished from them along with the women. Going back now, it will be 3 years in a couple weeks, in the fall before COVID began, my good buddy and I began to build a 16' x 24' workshop on his property. We frame…
/r/MensRights13/10/22 04:00 PM
88

There is NO BENEFIT WHATSOEVER in today's environment for a male to be alone with any female in an unrecorded professional scenario that isn't outweighed by the potential liabilities.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 03:27 PM
18

Guardians ad litem, are very often hugely, ridiculously biased against the male/father. This is why they are chosen.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 03:20 PM
7

I suspect that your psych book is reflecting statistics for women who have been diagnosed for anxiety and depression vs. men who have been diagnosed for anxiety and depression. One critical thing about that is that in order to be diagnosed you have to actually see a mental health care provider. We are ALL very well aware that men seek mental health care at rates FAR lower than women do. The reasons for that are numerous and it's not my intent to discuss them at this point.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 01:39 PM
85

It's not weird at all, if you consider the objectives at work here.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 07:33 PM
13

I agree with you. Who might that be indeed? The first thing you have to do is stop with the left/right thinking as it pertains to men's rights. If this is a matter that is important enough to you, then you and others with your same opinion should go out and find candidates that want to implement those policies. Failing that, gather more numbers to your cause and turn it into a matter of greater public concern. The only point I was making is that it's silly to wail and gnash teeth and wring hands…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 04:18 PM
9

Good... this is a good outcome. The practice WAS discriminatory.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:58 PM
1

Taken literally, the term means someone who is involuntarily celibate. This means that they WANT to get laid, but just aren't successful at doing so. However, some "incels" (and some MGTOWs) become rather vitriolic about their situations and become quite bitter, angry, and misogynistic. It is these people that those who use the term "incel" as a pejorative are attempting to insult.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:45 PM
26

Regardless of how you feel about selective service and the draft, this law still exists until you change it by voting in different people who will change it.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:15 PM
1

This is about trans-women. These are people assigned male gender at birth, who later transition to female, even though they are still genetically male. The ones who "want to be men" (to use your language) are born female and later transition to male despite remaining genetically female. They are also not required to register for selective service and thus, are not subject to being potentially drafted.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:20 PM
8

So OP, what happened after you were arrested? Were charges filed? Was there a court case? A verdict? Regarding the rest, her whole bullshit line on the phone sounds like the shit cops say to coerce suspects into confessing. You see it all the time when they show tapes of how they work on those shows where they are trying to catch a murderer or whatever... What was her motivation for falsely accusing you of rape? Did she stand to gain something financially? Was she angry that you two broke up? We…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 01:14 PM
3

Think about this and what the actual end goal of the demonization of men under the auspices of feminism could be, and realize that men are the ones that build and produce most of what our economy thrives on. What would the impact on western global economic power be if men were no longer receiving the fruits of their labor? Would they keep working or would they stop laboring? What happens to the economy then? With the Cold War between the US and USSR long over, who benefits from that? Who is in b…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:45 AM
2

Heh... holy shit. Amazing. ​ *edit* I thought this would have stood on its own, but apparently I need to explain: The hypocrisy of this is the issue. Yes, this policy existed prior to the Biden administration, however, that administration has advocated for and supported and embraced the very same trans cause/agenda that admonishes everyone and browbeats anyone to within an inch of their life for not acknowledging that trans-women are WOMEN, and trans-men are MEN. Meanwhile, trans-women are NOT w…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:08 PM
1

It might be worthwhile to give some indication of what PFAS are, where they come from, and whether or not we should be concerned. For instance, are PFAS found in pumpkin spice flavor additives? If so, and they have a negative effect on male health when consumed by mothers, we should surely be concerned.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:06 PM
1

I think that hiring anyone for a job that is less qualified for that job purely on the basis of some demographic, diversity, affirmative action requirement is foolish and terrible policy both in the short term and the long term. These practices are ALWAYS discriminatory (and not in the technically academic sense, but in the actual "bad" sense). Your case either does not give the position what it is due because you failed to hire the most qualified candidate for it when more appropriately qualife…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 03:40 PM
1

There's a lot to unpack here... Let's start with your assertion that women in the aggregate have historically faced more adversity than men. By what measure do you make this claim? I hear relatively often that that war impacts women more than it impacts men. I cannot understand if this is an Apex Fallacy issue or a Stalin issue. You're probably wondering what I mean by a "Stalin" issue... Stalin said: Death solves all problems, no man, no problem. Historically, men fought and died in wars at far…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 03:07 PM
4

Isn't there a country or countries in Europe (maybe the UK??? - I can't remember) where women are immediately given cash assistance to presumably help them with various recovery medical/mental health needs/resources as soon as they file charges of sexual assault? Otherwise, unless the woman has an axe to grind with a person, or that person stands in the way of something they want (job/promotion/grade/etc.), there would not likely be much incentive for random accusations like this. Now, if the wo…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 01:17 PM
15

If you watch a movie or consume any media that doesn't interest you solely based on being shamed into it, not only are you a simpering dupe, you're part of the problem by becoming the feedback in the loop of SJW shaming tactics. The only feedback that SJW shaming tactics deserve is the deafening silence of nobody giving a fuck. Bear in mind that the moneyed interests that back these sorts of media are also the moneyed interests carrying out the culture war.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 01:57 PM
10

Thank you, but it's all Karen Straughan.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:40 AM
15

So glad you got something out of it. Karen Straughan is an absolute all star and I cannot speak highly enough about her.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:25 AM
40

Again with this nonsense. These terms are literally not the same. They have actual real world implications. I attempted to educate you on these differences yesterday and yet here you are, stalking my posts in order to make your same inane arguments that deny the objective fact of the meanings of these terms.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:48 PM
28

So do you still consider yourself in favor of gender equity? If so, I am sure you have a laundry list of advantages you think women should be given to make them equal, yes? What advantages do you think men should be given to make them equal?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:26 PM
117

I'm going to leave this here for you to consider, as you consider what the term "Feminist" REALLY means and what this means for your son. The following is a very informed comment by Karen Straughan in response to a feminist who thinks the many blatant sexists among feminists aren't real feminists: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, te…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:20 PM
32

When you talk about "equity" do you really mean "equity" or do you mean "equality"? The reason I ask is because the two are different. Equality means everyone gets the same shot at whatever goal and are left to their own devices to get there, without any impedences based on their sex, sexuality, "race", etc., but without any particular special help. Equity means that some people are given advantages over others to ensure that all get the same outcome. In this milieu, equality can be likened to t…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:09 PM
4

This pretty much fits with at least one widely espoused theory that in terms of vocation, men in the aggregate tend to be interested in "THINGS" and women in the aggregate tend to be interested in "PEOPLE". In the 20th century, more women were pursuing advanced degrees as colleges and advanced degree programs opened up to them. It should be no surprise that clinical psychology drew women in if we consider that, in the aggregate, women tend to be interested in vocations dealing with PEOPLE. A rel…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:50 PM
30

Ah, toxic masculinity again, eh?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:20 PM
14

Meanwhile men are vilified for "Days until 18" countdowns and things like that...
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:00 PM
71

Meanwhile does anyone make a big deal about this gang of thuggish, violent women?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:20 PM
5

I have nothing to defend. My point is made clearly and accurately. You haven't provided any credible rebuttal to it other than to fabricate and/or deny definitions for words. Internet searches for the definitions of these words and concepts and stand in direct opposition to your so-called arguments. What have you posited other than some imaginary word definitions, and why do you think I must defend my position against your folly? Here's another term you can go look up: Your argument is beneath c…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 07:38 PM
5

I suspect that this is true, especially for a given age group, probably up to something like age 35 or so...
/r/MensRights04/10/22 07:01 PM
2

You're like the fakeademic who got caught drinking their own kool-aid and is backtracking and asserting your subjective opinion in obvious and objective denial of fact. These are simple concepts. Equality of outcome is a cornerstone of your personal political philosophy (assuming your post history is a representation of it). I get that this idea creates some cognitive dissonance for you, but you're going to have to build a bridge and get over it. It is neither correct, nor is it becoming for you…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:58 PM
0

You're the one whining here, not me.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:47 PM
2

Yeah man, you got it! I'm glad you took me at face value here. I was just trying to provide practical examples of these concepts.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:41 PM
0

You keep wanting to regulate people's opinions presumably in the name of some sort of personal freedom, but it looks more like you want to be some sort of thought police. The reality is that you're perfectly welcome to that opinion. But having your opinion doesn't make me any less entitled to mine. That's how all this works. Savvy?
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:40 PM
0

Sorry snowflake, but you don't get to shame me because you feel shamed by my opinion. I already told you I wasn't judging you over it.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:26 PM
3

Who the fuck do you think you are to assert that language means what you want it to? An example of equality of OPPORTUNITY is ensuring that all people who are qualified for a job and apply for it are considered for the job regardless of their sex, sexuality, "race", religion, etc. An example of equality of OUTCOME is ensuring that the person who does a half-assed job gets paid the same as the person who does twice as much at the same job as the half-assed person. ​ Another example of equality of…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:18 PM
1

So here's the thing: Just because I believe it's not a good way to be, does not mean I'm shaming someone about it. If I said "you're a pathetic neckbeard basement dweller because you pay cam whores to fill your spank bank with content", that would be shaming. I didn't say that. The insistence that everyone share the same opinion is not only anathema to the entirety of humanity, it's a hugely disruptive byproduct of the woke hivemind at work. There is some irony in what you're doing here. You're …
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:05 PM
2

No, I'm saying I meant "equality of outcome" when I said it. I also meant "equality of opportunity" when I said that - and I said it as a way to point out that there is a difference between the two. Do you justify your stance by insisting that "equality of outcome" is actually a meaningless term?
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:42 PM
7

I couldn't agree more, but I personally believe it's more of a morality and "correct" thing to do than I believe it has to do with the battle of the sexes. However, if you get your rocks off paying for an OF chick/cam whore to shove a lava lamp up her ass, while you spank your monkey watching, and that feels like a better trade to you than going through the minefield that is modern dating, I won't judge you. I will emotionally support you if you decide to change your ways though.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:37 PM
5

An easier way to think of the benefits vs. liablilities discussion is as follows: Between men and women, there are ACTUAL biological differences in certain capabilities, aptitudes, and function. These are objective and generally apply in the aggregate despite anomalous outliers (for example: trans women are NOT biological women and cannot bear children, but that does not mean that trans women prove that women can't bear children). So, anyway, back to the point - these differences lead to women h…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:33 PM
5

I get your analogy, but I don't necessarily agree that this would be the "easiest" way to fix things. It's not easy for them to fix it because in order to fix it, feminists would have to backtrack on their positions, and they've got a lot of sunk cost invested in those positions (hence the oversteer to correct the skid out. This is basically an analogy for the sunk cost fallacy - wihch is the idea that because a lot of effort/time/resources/money is invested in a failing venture, these sunk, unr…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:09 PM
8

Women do sort of control social media, but only sort of... Social media is a platform to sell stuff. Platform hosts sell advertising opportunities to companies with actual products and services to sell. Advertising sales are the mainstay of the income from social media. Content providers provide platform hosts with the means to actually sell advertising, since advertising is more valuable if it reaches more people, thus, the more popular your content is, the more attractive advertising time/spac…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:50 PM
9

Heh... I feel for you younger guys, for sure. Unfortunately, it's my own generation (Gen-X) that are the "wise" leaders of the present movement. A little history for you: I worked in north NJ (really a suburb of NYC) for a Fortune 100 company back in the 1990s when a lot of efforts really began in earnest to curb "sexual harassment" in the workplace. Back then a memo about sexual harassment and our new "zero tolerance" policy was circulated that we had to sign as having "read and understood" and…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 03:50 PM
2

If we are EVER stupid enough to remove ready access to paternity testing from potential fathers, the rate of paternity fraud would go through the roof in a decade.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 03:17 PM
6

No, dickhead. You don't get to rearrange my words and skip over terms that I've used and only present parts of what I've said. I said: "Feminism is about equality of outcome..." The entirety of the rest of your argument is based on your bullshit intentional attempt to misrepresent what I have said.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 03:14 PM
1

Fair enough, but there are a lot of important distinctions that get missed when people think about hate crime legislation. Misunderstanding what it is about leads them to being blind to the inevitability of the erosion of their ability to speak freely and to be free citizens.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 03:10 PM
6

This is typical left wing projection and gaslighting. Feminism is about equality of outcome which is inherently a communist/socialist - LEFT WING concept. The early days of feminism and its champions were loaded with communitsts. Affirmative action is an inherently socialist/communist/left wing concept. Portions of the feminist agenda have been advocated for by both republicans and democrat politicians in modern times, but in general, most ACTUAL conservatives (not just RINOs) do not believe in …
/r/MensRights04/10/22 02:57 PM
7

Never did I ever consider myself a feminist - I'm 52 years old for some perspective. I considered myself (and still do) to be someone who believes in equality of opportunity for people, regardless of anything about their sex, sexuality, race, religion (provided their religion isn't to destroy my culture and country), etc.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 02:48 PM
31

The original conception is that if you are part of a racist or sexist group or harbor those sorts of attitudes that is based around hating your chosen group then you should receive punishments beyond the normal. Close but not quite... The issue is that if you COMMIT A CRIME that has as part of its motivation, some sort of group level hatred for a protected group (i.e. not just individual hatred for that person) that you should be subject to harsher punishment. It is an important distinction. Wit…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 02:46 PM
4

The only issue with this strategy is that so-called "feminists" get to call themselves "feminists" when they practice and legislate for misandrist policies. As a result, they get away with calling anyone advocating AGAINST their misandrist policies misogynists because obviously, the policies are "feminist" first, and if you're against anything "feminist" you're a misogynist.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 02:27 PM
1

This is what Title IV-D does - incentivizes greedy government organizations to take money from citizens without the benefit of even a cursory application of logic to it. I have no follow up information, and would be surprised if there were any beyond this guy just being held accountable for child support going back to him being a 15 year old rape victim... that's what government does when you let them. This is a problem that can only be solved at the voting booth, and Title IV-D abuses are a par…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 02:25 PM
1

This is an example of a woman getting SOME punishment, though it's not clear to me if her punishment was commensurate with whatever a male would have received for the same offenses. On one hand, it is possibly an example of leniency bias towards female criminals, but on the other, it could represent a movement towards equality under the law for criminals regardless of their sex. In any event, it's worthy of discussion here.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 02:19 PM
3

Piers Morgan is a disrespectful assbag to begin with. I think he fancies himself something like that British journalist character from the movie V for Vendetta. Anyway, he, like so many people on the left feel entitled to be complete dickheads to anyone that doesn't toe their woke line of bullshit - all in the name of tolerance, right? Also, as part of the inevitable devouring of itself, the left recently hammered Morgan for some faux pas that I can't remember, and he needs to get back in their …
/r/MensRights04/10/22 01:51 PM
3

The obvious thing about this is the application of the double standard being applied. People say that the woman was justified in her violence because the man publically humiliated her. First off, women publically humiliate men all the fkn time - throwing shitfits, falsely accusing them of harrassment to get them kicked out of a bar or club, it's a daily occurrence. I wonder if the people who think the woman was justified in assaulting that man think it would be OK for a man to assault a woman wh…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 12:37 PM
1

This is fetish stuff... not illegal, not any different than Only Fans. Not very different (except for legality) than prostitution, or paying for used underwear or socks. BY way of comparison, look how much money coffee shops make off of women every year for pumpkin spice flavored stuff...
/r/MensRights03/10/22 03:40 PM
1

Imagine being in a state where you can say without shame or fear of derision: "I can't understand that logical point because I've been brainwashed", and nobody has any questions for you, they just give you a complete free pass. You don't even have to change your behavior because nobody around you thinks you should have to. Yeah, that's what's going on, guys.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:36 AM
27

Q: Why do people tell unattractive guys to be "nice" to compensate for being unattractive? A: Because even unattractive guys represent resources that would go to waste (from the female perspective) if the guy MGTOWs.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 04:03 AM
1

How old are you and this girl and her brother?
/r/MensRights28/09/22 10:11 PM
1

Heh... her issue is with her choice of men, but she's 5 for 5. She needs to think about what these men have in common besides their age and stop choosing men like this. I don't see her post as entitled as I see it being unwilling to consider that perhaps her selection criteria is at least partly to blame. Also, yeah, not for nothing, but if you're between 18 and 35 and have no medically diagnosed reason for erection difficulty, or inability to climax, chances are, it's a porn issue.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 10:05 PM
76

This showed up in the comment section of another thread. I commented there and will restate the jist of it here. That video makes me think of two things: 1) The way this woman acts in the video is the way I imagine some of those clowns over on TwoX and Askfeminists act in real life. 2) If a man had been throwing this kind of a shitfit in a store, no associates from the store would have come over to see what the issue was. They'd have called the cops IMMEDIATELY. The cops would have responded VER…
/r/MensRights28/09/22 09:59 PM
65

Heh... the over/under for a twitter ban if you posted a poll asking if women deserved rights is 15 minutes...
/r/MensRights28/09/22 06:30 PM
1

The only way to actually address bullying is to police it and respond to bullying behavior with swift and harsh correction. To do this requires people to be unbiased and vigilant. You cannot put the job on school teachers. They already have enough on their plate and shouldn't have to take extra educational requirements to address bullies along with the rest of the bullshit they deal with. I'll be happy if we just let teachers teach and do so effectively, while removing as many road blocks to the…
/r/MensRights28/09/22 01:57 PM
4

And this is what you get from such bafoon-ish-ness: https://www.reddit.com/r/trashy/comments/xmnkb7/karen\_cuts\_in\_line\_and\_freaks\_out\_when\_confronted/ Heh, that video is what I imagine most of those shitheads over on places like TwoX and Askfeminists are like. If a man had behaved that way in a store, no associate would have come over to find out what was going on. The cops would have been called immediately and they would have arrived quickly, came in heavy, throwing a beat down on that…
/r/MensRights28/09/22 01:34 PM
1

I appreciate it, and am very pleased it resonated with you, but don't thank me. Thank Karen Straughan and the various people who have posted it around here. I just saved the post when it showed up and refer to it now and then when questions like this come up.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 08:27 PM
18

The following is a very informed comment by Karen Straughan in response to a feminist who thinks the many blatant sexists among feminists aren't real feminists: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of m…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 07:12 PM
-2

In any given conversation relating even remotely to politics or laws, WAY more people feel the need to point out that they are atheists and this is where their "enlightened" view comes from, than people who point out that they are Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, etc. Being an atheist must be kind of like being vegan, I guess.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 05:25 PM
2

These are pretty much all baked into the current curriculum in American (and I believe western European) public schools. If there are any of tactics that any of you have NOT encountered, I would submit that you just haven't spoken about MRA to enough people yet.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 03:08 PM
13

There are plenty of people who believe that abortion is bad who aren't religious. There are plenty of religious people who think that birth control and birth control education should be part of general curriculum of public schools. The problem with all of these arguments is that we make them with such broad brushes instead of looking at the actual heart of the matter. It is much easier, or perhaps intellectually comfortable, to vilify a person who makes a willing choice about something than it i…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 03:03 PM
12

Groupthink - it's what's for dinner.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 02:55 PM
2

Ah, right. OK cool. Thank you for clarifying. I take your meaning now.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 02:52 PM
2

But what does that really have to do with prefrontal cortex maturation at age 25? There are many differences between the male and female brains.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 02:44 PM
8

Well Atheists practice their non-religion with the rabid zeal of the most devoutly religious... so... what really is the practical difference?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 02:40 PM
5

Atheism was for years, the fastest growing religion in the west. Unfortunately, in recent years, Feminism has overtaken it and now remains the fastest growing religion in the west, if not the globe. Atheism is still #2 though.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 01:22 PM
5

The 25 year old argument is pretty well supported - and it applies to both men's and women's brains. Certainly there may be outliers within a population, but by and large, in the aggregate, the age for full prefrontal cortex development is 25. There used to be a lot of talk about females' prefrontal cortexes developing up to 2 years earlier, but most of that was an extrapolation of the fact that females tend to be farther along the brain development curve in puberty, but I haven't seen much supp…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 09:18 PM
3

Ask her to make me a sandwich?
/r/MensRights26/09/22 08:39 PM
53

That will all be dismissed as misogyny, just like it was for the awful Ghostbusters all female reboot.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 07:43 PM
148

Movies like this are just social experiments - to see if they can push the shaming of men and general misandry to the point of making a profit on a piece of media that has LITERALLY nothing else going for it. There is considerable financial backing for this agenda. The questions that should be asked are not about how this movie could get made, but rather: Why is this agenda so strongly desired? Who is bankrolling it? What could their larger goals be?
/r/MensRights22/09/22 05:17 PM
2

You will get nothing but "Have you stopped beating your wife?" Type questions, and no mods will enforce "good faith posting" rules. If the moderation of this sub is an example of the BEST that can be expected for any sort of MRA oriented sub, what kind of shitshow do you think any moderators of your proposed sub would let it become?
/r/MensRights21/09/22 04:34 PM
2

Do what, now?
/r/PussyPass21/09/22 04:24 PM
2

Shit. I hate it for you, brother. Maybe look into some counseling if that is an option. The counselor's job is to create a judgement free, safe space for you to unload and get it off your chest and talk it out, and then to teach you coping skills to help you move through all this. The one thing I can tell you that I am 100% certain about is that being a victim of something like this does not say anything about you. You are not at fault, not to blame, not a bad person. It does tell me and everyon…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 07:32 PM
24

I wonder if the roles were reversed and her BF's dad was charging HER rent and not him, if she would expect him to split it with her.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 04:21 AM
53

If the roles in this story were reversed, do you think you'd see this comment: But that aside, he is denying you status as a full human with sexual desires. You can't want sex, only he can want sex, and then sex can only be on his terms. That's both controlling and demeaning to you - he has sexual rights that you can't have. It is completely unjust that you have no ability to try and initiate sex. This requires a discussion about why he doesn't see you as an equal and as others said, perhaps som…
/r/MensRights16/09/22 07:50 PM
2

This story and comments reads like a "how to" book on making bad decisions.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 03:31 PM
12

One would think that women with different opinions would voice them en masse, no? Of course, they also benefit from the deference and tilted playing field their misandrist sisters are shouting from every roof top and podium that drive the legislation. So why would they buck the tide?
/r/MensRights15/09/22 09:04 PM
3

Well shit, my apologies! I must have seemed incredibly patronizing! Good for you, and good luck!
/r/MensRights15/09/22 07:09 PM
2

Only if you are duped into impregnating or marrying one of those gold digging whores.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 07:07 PM
3

Well that's a mercy! Stick to your guns and demand the paternity test before any admission or proximity or anything else. Also document everything you can reliably. Take screenshots of text messages and back those up. Keep a log of interactions, calls, conversations, events, with dates, times, and transcriptions, of what was said/done. I still STRONGLY suggest that you seek legal advice as well.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 05:10 PM
1

Seriously, who gives a shit what they have to say?
/r/MensRights15/09/22 04:00 PM
4

Who cares how you are viewed? The only women who would judge you harshly are the kind of cunts who would baby trap a dude themselves - who gives a shit what they think? Depending on where this is happening, she may be stalling on the paternity test because she knows that if she lets it lie, all she has to do is put your name on the birth certificate and the state will begin to force you to pay. It will be up to YOU to prove you ARE NOT the father, NOT up to the state or this woman to prove you a…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 03:44 PM
17

The issues that college women are bitching about (or that we are led to believe that they are) with regard to their deserved "satisfying dating experience" are 100% created by those women and the feminist policies and practices: Scarcity of men in general - this is the result of hugely preferential admissions favoring women over men - women outnumber boys on campus 3 to 2, and graduation rates are nearly 2 females getting a bachelors for every 1 male getting one - speaks to dropouts and admissio…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 03:37 PM
7

If you withhold time, money, and other resources, the law will grant her a divorce and you won't get sex from her, and the law will still make you spend your time to provide her with money and resources. Meanwhile if she withholds sex, the law will grant you a divorce, you won't get sex from her but the law will still make you spend your time to provide her with money and resources. Agreed though about sex terrorists. The problem is that the law has dealt her all the cards and none to you, and t…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 02:35 PM
309

I'm on blood pressure meds which include a diuretic. This means that I get about 15 minutes of warning max before the urge to pee is... well... URGENT. If someone pulled a knife on me while I'm hurriedly trying to find a bathroom, I can pretty much guarantee that I'm going to be pissing as I pull out my carry piece...
/r/MensRights14/09/22 12:39 PM
6

Heh... years ago, I had EXACTLY this conversation with a woman I was dating at that time.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 12:35 PM
12

This kind of attitude is pure garbage and aimed at keeping weight and pressure on the only non-socially constructed leverage that women actually have over men - sex.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 12:15 PM
1

This is an extremely accurate and insightful statement.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 11:50 AM
4

Thank you.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 11:49 AM
1

Hard to know. I do know that it was not the men's intention to sit with all the guys on one side and the gals on the other.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 11:41 AM
9

Also true!
/r/MensRights13/09/22 11:22 PM
4

You don't know how right you are! Thank you!
/r/MensRights13/09/22 11:22 PM
3

Well, people say all kinds of shit when they're hurting and angry, and when they've been drinking. I don't believe "in vino veritas" applies all the time either. As someone above said, I wouldn't want everything I ever said to be held against me. Sometimes we all say shit that is ugly and that we don't really mean. Hopefully we learn and do better. Honestly, I think today's social media, instant and devastating judgement climate is vastly more harmful in terms of real human interaction (warts an…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:55 PM
3

Yep, that's why it was our inside joke. I doubt anyone else even heard it. They just saw us clink glasses and laugh together.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:51 PM
9

Nah, she was busting my chops (we've known each other several years and are friends). Our whole exchange was making fun of ourselves over politically correct/incorrect speech. I'm one of the last people anyone there expected to admonish someone using the term "body shaming". When I called her "baby" that was me being "sexist" (as a joke to her, good naturedly), and her saying "that's my boy" was her being condescending (as a joke to me and also good natured). Her first remark was also her acknow…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:47 PM
2

Hahaha! Thank you!
/r/MensRights13/09/22 08:49 PM
19

Came here to post this.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 08:30 PM
7

Current book on this is: 7 to 5 on her charges being dropped. 3 to 1 on her being found not guilty Even money on the over/under of 18 months for combined jail and parole/probation if she's found guilty.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 08:15 PM
2

Not sure what the reference is... thinking it's funny... have a link?
/r/MensRights13/09/22 08:04 PM
1

Heh, yep... you'd have fit in fine there, even if you don't like bourbon or stogies...
/r/MensRights13/09/22 08:03 PM
3

Many of us that were there that night have been friends long enough that this was low on the "awkward" scale for us. We weathered much worse in the process of finding equilibrium and tolerance with our enjoyment of each others' company.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 08:02 PM
12

Heh, indeed! The woman whose porch we were sitting on (and who is a massive SJW that I've known for years and have butted heads with - without real personal animosity) leaned in to me and said quietly: "Body shaming, huh? It's nice to see you've learned a thing or two over the years of talking with me!" I replied "You got that right, baby!" Her reply "That's my boy!" We clinked our drinks together and had a pretty good chuckle over it and our little inside joke.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 08:00 PM
9

This isn't a real post from this guy. It's a repost of a post that has been floating around for at least 2 years. This is karma farming. https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueOffMyChest/comments/jvuzgu/i\_sent\_100\_applications\_as\_a\_man\_and\_a\_woman\_its/
/r/MensRights13/09/22 07:44 PM
3

Is this really much different than when US state and federal government requires by law that a certain percentage of their private contracts go to women and minority owned businesses?
/r/MensRights13/09/22 07:06 PM
4

This is LITERALLY untrue based on what you posted... GTFO.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 06:28 PM
8

Really? Because this post from 2 years ago looks JUST like yours... which looks JUST like the one from yesterday: https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueOffMyChest/comments/jvuzgu/i_sent_100_applications_as_a_man_and_a_woman_its/ ​ Content of old post: So I did an experiment, I work in CS and decided to test what the gender bias is. So I took my CV and changed the name to a female name. I'd send it out with my real name, then a few days later (or few days before) with a female name. Out of 100, my applica…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 06:17 PM
2

Pretty sure this same thing was posted months back - I might have read it in another sub - perhaps Programming humor or something... not sure... anyway... I know it was also referenced here back then. Feeling like this is a karma farming repost. *edit* and here is a version of it from 2 years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueOffMyChest/comments/jvuzgu/i\_sent\_100\_applications\_as\_a\_man\_and\_a\_woman\_its/
/r/MensRights13/09/22 06:15 PM
10

OK this was just posted yesterday. When it showed up here, I thought I had seen it in other subs months before that, and even referenced here. Ease up on the karma farming, eh?
/r/MensRights13/09/22 06:11 PM
101

So I hate that you're going through this and I definitely do feel for you. I am going to sound very negative with what I'll say next, but please understand that I just want you to realize where you stand. I hope like hell that you are completely exonerated in this case. With that said, I hate to tell you this, but in your case, as a male being accused in the workplace of something, it's not like an actual court case. If a woman is making a complaint, she is automatically believed, and it is up t…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 05:53 PM
19

I hear you, but there was some time vested in friendships there, and there was a lot of drinking going on, and we'd known some of these women for years. I have butted heads (without REAL personal animosity) for years with one of the biggest SJW women in the group, but we still do treat each with respect and remain friends despite some of our disagreements. It was effective enough to comment on their behavior with my remark. They were self-aware enough to see the point and decent enough to be she…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 04:54 PM
3

Hate it for ya... good luck.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 04:37 PM
11

Heh, anyone still think that women behaving as if they aren't accountable for their actions is a recent phenomenon?
/r/MensRights13/09/22 02:12 PM
4

But WHY specifically do you think that people see girls as victims and not boys?
/r/MensRights13/09/22 01:58 AM
-1

So you attribute this to "traditional" male vs. female "rules" about showing emotion and/or retaining dominance and control in situations? Do you believe that underage men are ACTUALLY damaged less by SA from an adult female than underage females are by SA from an adult male?
/r/MensRights12/09/22 10:14 PM
4

OK but at what age does one become a "kid fucker"? Is it defined by the law of whatever state wherever it happens? The age of consent in Georgia is 16. The age of consent in Florida is 18. Say it's a 25 year old woman having sex with a 16 year old boy in Georgia. Is she a "kid fucker" and therefore a rapist? What if that same 25 year old woman is having sex with the same 16 year old boy in Florida. Is she a "kid fucker" and therefore a rapist?
/r/MensRights12/09/22 10:06 PM
6

I am sure that people DO believe this. I just wonder why they believe it. I am hoping that some links to psychological data on this comparison of experienced trauma between underage males and females come through in this thread from other posters that will shed some light on whether or not there is any truth to this.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 10:02 PM
1

OK gotcha. Thank you! I wasn't trying to badger you. For the record, I believe you are correct that society believes these things, and I also believe that society at large is incorrect with these perceptions.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:59 PM
3

So you ALSO believe that pedophiles and rapists should be executed, yes?
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:52 PM
3

Why do you think people believe it is more traumatic for a 16 year old girl to be raped by an adult male than it is for a 16 year old boy to be raped by an adult female?
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:51 PM
18

Heh... yep... understood...
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:48 PM
8

I agree that the legal definitions of pedophile and rapist do vary, but a response so visceral as to wish execution on such people must surely come from a place of moral outrage rather than statutory variance, no?
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:43 PM
6

OK I think the part about males being pursuers is probably pretty valid. This is GENERALLY (though not universally) true, or to state it perhaps a bit more accurately (in my mind at least), more men spend more time and effort directly pursuing sex than women spend directly pursuing it. The Graduate was pretty controversial when it first came out. I wonder how it compares in controversy to other works like Nabokov's Lolita... Anyway, I'm not sure I agree with you that it was socially "acceptable"…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:42 PM
3

OK so you believe that adult female on underage victim SA is either perceived to happen or ACTUALLY happens with lower frequency than adult male on underage victim does, is that correct? Regarding your second item and psychological trauma - I do agree that it would be difficult to compare them between young males and young females without some fairly involved longitudinal studies (I wonder if any have been conducted), and so people believe that males just don't suffer as much trauma as females d…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:28 PM
13

So, your response raises a few questions: In many places, the definition of rape does not include forcing a male against his wishes to penetrate someone either orally or vaginally/anally - so in those places, there is no such thing as a female rapist unless she sticks something into a male. So, how would you define "rape"? How does your thinking on this apply to statutory rape - where one party is not legally capable of consenting (either by virtue of age, being imprisoned, being adjudicated men…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:23 PM
2

"real" men or women are just a reflection of the "No True Scottsman" fallacy. Right here... came to post this.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 08:35 PM
5

The first part of the issue you're describing is the hypergamous nature of women. I would argue that this is driven by biology and heavily reinforced by society, even from the earliest "caveman" days when the human gestational cycle and the relative helplessness of newborn human beings forced women to find a mate that could protect and provide. Additionally, what you described is due in part to a legislative system that has heavily encouraged and subsidized this sort of behavior. After 50 years …
/r/MensRights12/09/22 08:20 PM
26

Well he wasn't wrong 19 years ago when this interview happened, and he's still not wrong today. Consider the extreme success of the Law and Order franchise (including all spinoffs) and the fact that from 1990 to today, 32 years later, these shows are still part of the US pop culture landscape. Hell, the original show was revived earlier this year after being canceled for 12 years and a new season of it is about to kick off later this month. Meanwhile, two other spinoffs of it are still running a…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 08:01 PM
3

First off, the enemy of your enemy is not always your friend, sometimes they're your enemy too. Secondly, I don't really care about infighting within the feminist movement - that, like all other leftist movements, will eventually eat itself - if this helps, then I'm all for it. Thirdly, I can see some points of TERFs - M2F trans people are displacing biological women in athletics, and are appropriating feminism in other aspects as well. If I were in their shoes, I'd be pretty annoyed that someon…
/r/MensRights08/09/22 03:35 PM
1

It will be a fucking disaster. Hell in family court in the US, not only do they not use juries, but if there are children involved, the judges will often rely on the personal opinions and biases of the non-judicially qualified guardian ad litem for what effectively amounts to the entirety of the settlement.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 12:56 PM
4

My remark was in response to her reducing the entire discussion to her being female and how America 'hates women'. I said the only reason people pay any attention to her at all (good or bad) is because she's a woman. That's the majority of her platform - being female.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 11:08 AM
29

Lol. The only reason anyone even knows her name is because she's female.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 01:31 AM
1

I would think that the answer to your question would be self evident. Here's a hint: when you call it a standard, you have to enforce it equally.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 09:35 PM
1

Chris Rock was correct, only women, children, and dogs are unconditionally loved. Men are only loved if they are producing or providing something. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the workplace, though it applies in the home as well. What these women in the workforce are finding out is that unlike everywhere else in their lives where they receive unconditional love, their jobs don't unconditionally love them back just because they're women. They must produce and continually prove their valu…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 08:04 PM
1

You are speaking about examples of female solipsism.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 08:00 PM
1

A subjectively applied standard is no standard at all. It is censorship. If you believe what you typed above, you are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 07:00 PM
0

Did Peterson call for violence against others? I know you can't possibly think that some standard of civility is policed on Twitter.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 06:48 PM
2

It will soon only be a term that academics allow one to use as it pertains to males being the perpetrator and women being the victim of it - just like how they redefined "racism" to be only applicable from a majority group as the perpetrator with a minority group as the victim. Reject this horseshit.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:45 PM
2

Heh, it's funny - the "traditional" male role was fine for many men, until it started to be "expected" rather than "appreciated". The "traditional" male role is what made the western world great and is responsible for the vast majority of progress, both technically, and socially. Now the "traditional" male role is not just "expected" but exploited by family courts which incentivize divorce and the divestment of the hard-working traditional male of the fruits of his labor, turning him into a rat …
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:41 PM
35

The twitterverse is no friend of MRA, and frankly, the platform itself is the bully - enforcing conformity - requiring that people toe the line that THEY decide with regard to "bullying". That is to say that the twittersphere basically defines anything that goes against their identity politics as bullying and then uses that premise to bully any dissenting voices. It seriously is Orwellian and is best avoided. I wish Musk had purchased the platform, if, for no other reason than the fact that he w…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 01:21 PM
7

School grading, should all be "blind". I'd like to see them do the same for college admission reviews... can you imagine the uproar that would cause?
/r/MensRights06/09/22 07:38 PM
34

I am saddened by her passing, but grateful to Vincent for sharing these experiences and observations. I wonder if her being a lesbian had much to do with the way she perceived and/or internalized the experiences and interactions she had, especially in the dating milieu. I suspect a cis-het woman dressing up as a dude and repeating the Vincent experiment might have a VERY different message, and in fact, might not even be able to pull off some of the things that Vincent did - in particular going o…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:47 PM
54

"It had been one of the great collective female shortcomings to presume that whatever we did not perceive simply isn't there...ditto for the stereotype of women monopolizing conversations...I sat there stunned by the social ineptitude of the people to whom it never seemed to occur that no one...would have any interest in enduring this ordeal." (p 106) For anyone who is confused upon seeing the term "female/feminine solipsism" or "solipsistic behavior" (it shows up quite often in MRA writing) - t…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:34 PM
9

This perspective is 100% objectively false. The cheating partner completely owns the decision to cheat. If they were unsatisfied in the relationship, they should have made their dissatisfaction known to their partner, and if it wasn't worked out, then they should have sought to get out of the relationship or request some sort of "open" arrangement rather than cheating behind he back of their partner. This goes even if the other partner is cheating.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 04:48 PM
1

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/progressive-nyc-school-administrator-put-on-paid-leave-after-sting-video/ Paid administrative leave, while school obtains counsel to investigate. The school says it found it "deeply disturbing" that their administrator was recorded without her knowledge...
/r/MensRights05/09/22 06:45 PM
3

Thank you.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:25 PM
24

Heh, I actually think this was a calculated move by her in order to garner some support and/or some love by mentioning someone who is probably more famous than she is right now...
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:00 PM
3

I couldn't agree more. Globalist leftists are using radical feminism (among other tools) to disrupt and upend western capitalist society in general.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:56 PM
1

Heh... you're a clown, dude. The interviewer asked "Is there any hope for saving these Republican white guys?" Norris {paraphrased} "Nah, we need a few serial killers to just wipe them off the face of the earth - yes... I said serial killers... I mentioned Dexter a couple times..."
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:41 PM
17

Heh... what a crock of horseshit. Kinda funny how openly gay Dave Rubin is on Daily wire with the rest of those anti-LGBTQ people, eh?
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:37 PM
2

You're acting like a goddamn idiot who can't fucking read or understand words coming out of someone's mouth. Fucking watch the video, read the transcripts, for fuck's sake!
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:36 PM
5

I will look for it.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:35 PM
29

It sounds like it... Wishing I knew more about her, though it's just making me feel sad right now. Shit.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:34 PM
16

Ah... God damn! That's a fucking shit thing to have happened to her... fuck.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:33 PM
1

Did you watch the video? I did. Here's the transcript: Norris: Unfortunately, it’s the white boys who feel very entitled to express their opposite opinions and just push back. There’s a huge contingent of them that are just horrible. And you’re like, “Are you always going to be horrible, or are you just going to be horrible right now?” Don’t know. Veritas Journalist: Is there any saving these Republican white guys? Norris: I don’t know. I think they need to go. I think they’re really awful peopl…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:30 PM
117

Was she dying of some terminal disease? I know very little about her other than what I just read at the provided link in the OP, however, I think I might like to read what she had to say. I suspect she gave an honest take on things based on her experiences based on the notable quote on the linked page. RIP - it sounds like the world might be a lesser place without her.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:20 PM
24

Heh, it's funny to watch people melt down over Jordan Peterson. He is an academic in the truest, most pure sense of the word. I get that a lot of folks don't like him, but I think a lot of folks are used to academics who aren't worthy of the title because they have become sellouts and compromised their intellectual discipline and indeed their intellectual honesty in order to be widely "liked" by the uneducated and ignorant people behind the whole social justice/woke movement. Above all else, Pet…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:14 PM
1

I'm not following you, this might be a "two nations separated by a common language" issue. By dungaree, do you mean what we call "overalls" in the US?
/r/MensRights02/09/22 05:23 PM
1

Yeah I admit it's a bit confusing. I suspect that she was either self-aggrandizing with her "double agent" shit, or lying about her principal and asst. head supporting her. Maybe she feels like a double agent because she is supposed to be a trusted advocate for children as a school administrator, but in reality, she wants to murder half of them. ​ Regardless this woman is pure evil and indicative of the general leftist mindset going around these days. As for this - I could not agree more.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 05:16 PM
2

Lets just not mention she's going against the administration and what she was told, I understood that the principal told her that he supported her not giving "both sides" a voice in the lineup of guest speakers. In other words, it didn't sound to me like the administration has really told her not to do these things and instead, supports her doing them. Maybe I misundersood what she said though... Here is the transcript of it, which matches up with what I believe I heard her say on the video: Nor…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 05:04 PM
4

I agree that this is about politics, not really feminism, however, it is a good expose on the way leftards think about males who disagree with them. This stupid cow in the video advocated for the white boys who feel "entitled" to "express opposing opinions" to her are protected by capitalism and should be murdered and removed from society... ​ Something tells me that not all of those rich parents are aware of what is going on at the school they spend $60k/year on and that one of its administrato…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 04:42 PM
2

I would bet that 80% of the men who could afford to live that lifestyle would do so. Many of the men who can financially afford that lifestyle are too busy and cannot "afford" the time to live that lifestyle. The remaining 20% would probably want something a little more quiet and peaceful as they approach their 50s. I'm sure Leo's busy, but probably not "hedge fund manager" busy.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:07 PM
1

Why is this post removed?
/r/MensRights02/09/22 01:43 PM
14

Heh, this isn't a "feminist" thing, per se, this is a lefty thing. I have been saying this a while now... the particularly subversive and ugliest things that are done institutionally under the name of "feminism" are ACTUALLY done to disrupt, subvert, and erode politically. She says it herself - she wants to disrupt. She reviles capitalism even though that is what's responsible for having a fucking job at all. Pay attention to this stuff, guys, it's not necessarily all about feminism, it's about …
/r/MensRights02/09/22 01:26 PM
4

Yep... The overwhelmingly vast majority of women who say they want these soy boy types are either women that nobody would want to date, or find out soon enough that the soy boys aren't what they REALLY want.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 01:16 PM
1

I'm talking about expectations of physical attractiveness that are not in their control - like the size of their breasts.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 12:01 AM
2

Agreed. It's also not something people should judge others about.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:39 PM
9

Heh... they killed Socrates in 399 BC. In 2022, they would kill a million Socrates a day if that's what it took.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:05 PM
7

Heh... Data SURELY is beautiful. Thank you for posting this, OP. When I can get another free award, it's yours!
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:01 PM
12

Who says women should have shorter sentences? I know they DO get shorter and more lenient sentences, but I don't believe there is a legitimate reason for it.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:08 PM
2

Yeah, again, you're speaking a lot of wisdom here. I do agree. Whatever it takes to get men to take their own health seriously enough to do even embarrassing and potentially uncomfortable but NECESSARY things for their health (prostate exams, colonoscopy, etc.).
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter