TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CeciNEstPasUnInkwell Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by CeciNEstPasUnInkwell on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

women aren't even less visually attracted to men, women aren't attracted to men in any aspect. Women fucking despise men. In the past they were forced to wed men, and now that they no longer have to marry, they instead opt to use men for their resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 08:57 PM
1

You really thought you did something...
/r/ExRedPill10/11/20 12:38 PM
0

Cope
/r/ExRedPill10/11/20 12:20 PM
1

The ones who tell the truth, yes.
/r/ExRedPill10/11/20 12:20 PM
-1

I'm mostly making fun of anyone who believes the droves of complete bullshit this website and others of its ilk push on people whose heads are already buried in sand to begin with
/r/ExRedPill10/11/20 11:24 AM
-1

When science has an agenda, who do you trust? I trust my own experience and the experience of those in similar situations. "studies" about anything involving women cannot be trusted.
/r/ExRedPill10/11/20 11:14 AM
-2

The very own idea that 30% of men are sexless means that 70% of men are having sex, meaning the core of incel theories are wrong. Yeah you're right, they're wrong. That number is actually much higher. I'd say the number of sexless men is around 80-90% on the 18-25 demographic.
/r/ExRedPill10/11/20 10:46 AM
1

He clearly states that the top 20% of women also have similar statistics, meaning that top 20% of people who have the most sex account for 50% to 60% of all sex that is had. Again, you seem to think this is some sort of sick incel-destroying facts and logic truth bomb when it's the equivalent of "well, women actually earn 75% of what men do, not 50%, so...". Saying "it's not just because of attractiveness!!!1!1!" Is just a softer way of saying "it's mostly because of attractiveness but I'm going…
/r/ExRedPill10/11/20 09:56 AM
1

Did we read the same article?? Nope, clearly we did not....
/r/ExRedPill10/11/20 09:41 AM
0

You say it didn't mess you up psychologically but here you are lashing out at people advocating against cutting off parts of children's genitals
/r/ExRedPill10/11/20 09:29 AM
-2

Against my better judgement I decided to read the first article that's presented on that page. Firstly it opens with a statement along the lines of "incels see their lack of sex as evidence that they're worthless in life", but it doesn't dismiss that point as ridiculous, it doesn't condemn it, nothing! It just marches on with the rest of the article. So what I gather is that this author -does- agree with the notion that sexual insuccess is detrimental to a man's worth, which is proving the incel…
/r/ExRedPill10/11/20 09:05 AM
4

I think it's funny that whoever wrote this drivel thinks "20% of men aren't getting 80% of sex, it's actually closer to 60%!" Is this amazing incel-owning truth bomb
/r/ExRedPill10/11/20 08:59 AM
-3

Why is it that these articles always boil down to "yeah these shitty things happen to men, but it doesn't matter because men"? Also, this article glorifies circumcision, so it's not only wrong but harmful.
/r/ExRedPill10/11/20 08:57 AM
6

Just because I'm an introvert doesn't make me a subhuman creature, you condescending chode
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 10:09 PM
0

hmmm.... there's hope for you yet. I only generalize because as a romantically unsuccessful man, I'm constantly generalized against with nothing I can do about it. It's only fair.
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 08:27 PM
0

Some women are shitty. That is not something denied here. Red Pill thinking, especially 'awalt' isn't the truth. Sure, not all women. But it's enough women for it to be a problem, and the good women should be calling out the shitty women. sound familiar? it's what people say when someone says "not all men"
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 07:55 PM
0

Additionally, according to 2011 to 2015 CDC data, women between ages 25 and 44 had a median of 4.2 sexual partners, while men in that age group had a median of 6.1 sexual partners. medians literally mean nothing though. Also, women tend to understate their number of sexual partners while men tend to overstate it, so those numbers are unreliable to begin with.
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 07:40 PM
0

You're wasting your breath. I'll believe what I see with my very eyes before I believe the empty words of any women apologist on the internet.
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 06:08 PM
0

The two paragraphs of your comment contradict each other.
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 05:50 PM
1

Nothing to learn here. Just people blind to reality and talking out of their asses. If you are in a position where you see no reason to believe in the shitty behavior of women in dating, it means you're benefitting from said shitty behavior. There's a reason it's called the "red pill". Calling yourself "ex repill" is like saying you're an "ex-athiest". Why would one willingly walk away from the truth unless they're dumb or they benefit directly from the system perpetuating the lies?
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 05:35 PM
1

I'm mostly here to laugh at all the delusional, privileged people
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 05:20 PM
1

lmao I wouldn't expect you or anyone else in this sub of ostriches with their heads buried in the sand to get it.
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 04:15 PM
1

Ok, what one trait does your friend have that made that possible? He's tall. That's all he's got and that's all that's needed.
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 04:00 PM
1

I've had a friend of mine have sex with a woman within -minutes- of meeting her. Stop gaslighting.
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 03:21 PM
2

They don't like to be treated like shit by unnattractive men. If you're attractive it stops being "treated like shit" and starts being "dominated by a strong man". All of this bullshit of making men less dominant literally only exists so women can more easily weed out the lesser men (those who will discard their manhood and submit to women) from the greater men (those who don't submit to anyone and carry their dominant, masculine strength and energy). Now, women: abuse is abuse but me looking at…
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 02:41 PM
1

I'm going to say it again to be clear: literally nothing is an 'instant panty dropper'. Saying things repeatedly doesn't make them any more true.
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 02:22 PM
1

As someone who have had a great number of women, i never talk around how i pump women, even if when someone want to talk about it. But you literally just did...
/r/ExRedPill01/11/20 01:39 PM
1

If you want this sub to be "exredpill" it helps to engage and counter points instead of burying your head in the sand when a person who isn't even really a redpiller actually makes a decent point
/r/ExRedPill19/10/20 09:38 PM
1

Complaining about generalizations and then immediately ending your post with a generalization, stay classy, women...
/r/ExRedPill17/10/20 10:19 AM
1

and you see men as broken for being late bloomers, or shorter than a certain height, or having or not having hair in specific places or a certain amount of money. Don't try and take the high ground here because women are anything but innocent
/r/ExRedPill15/09/20 01:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter