TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CelestialDos Archive

View 3 posts and 169 comments by CelestialDos on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

I'm pretty sure the right to look where ever you want publicly is pretty much given at birth and whatever sacrifices men or women have made has no bearing on it. That being said: just because you can do something doesn't mean you should :)
/r/MensRights15/02/16 11:28 PM
1

I have noticed that trend, but here's my question: When the fuck did we start stooping to their level? Do we not call out the bullshit articles about non-issues? Do we not tell feminists writers that they're wrong when they write about manspreading? Why are you more eager to join in than to rise above? Context is important. Banning people in the western world is bad according to our objective morality (i.e. the law) However not banning people in Saudi Arabia if you can't adhere to the segregatio…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 03:07 AM
9

Surveys like these rely on a basic premise which I have a hard time accepting. That women know what they actually want. In my experience, which granted is completely anecdotal they don't even remotely. Women tend to go with what makes them feel good, and in the absent of any religious indoctrination or true believers. They don't care whether you've slept with a man or not. They just care about how you make them feel.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 10:31 PM
1

What are you on about? I presume what you're trying to do is gender-bend the article, in that case: If the article was "Men welcome at a Saudi Arabia Starbucks shop after temporary ban" Followed by two tweeters reaction and then a comment from Starbucks who explains the Saudi segregation laws and mentions that there's one where women is banned then firstly I would think it's a slow news day and secondly - Yes, I would find that acceptable. It's perfectly responsible reporting.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 09:49 PM
1

The headline of the reddit article was written by you. Why are you trying to use it as a source? You're the one wasting time trying to make a mountain out of a molehill.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 01:01 PM
1

Headline is: "Women welcome at a Saudi Arabia Starbucks shop after temporary ban" Still only truth. Not sexist. Women were not allowed now they are. What's your point?
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:06 AM
47

Nothing. Don't show up, don't engage. There's no reason to extend her platform or give her any context in which she can play the victim.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 02:37 PM
115

This is such bullshit. I don't give a shit that she wants her husband to get snipped, nor that she is withholding sex even though it's apparently abuse according to feminists No, the thing that pisses me of is that she is touting her fucking horn in a public facebook post letting every be a spectator to their private businesses and in the process making herself out to be the hero. Fuck you I'm not sorry about you having all the choices about contraception while us men only has condoms or surgery…
/r/MensRights11/02/16 01:03 PM
1

Just read the headline one more time. This article's headline is "Women welcome at a Saudi Arabia Starbucks shop after temporary ban" Doesn't seem all that sexist to me.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 12:43 PM
3

It is for some. Which sadly is the only reason Hillary has a shot.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 03:24 AM
1

No I was asking a relevant question. It seems you're trying to cement your position through vagueness so I asked for clarity.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 03:10 AM
1

The article, the segregation laws or the two tweeters?
/r/MensRights11/02/16 12:21 AM
1

It's not about rationalizing anything. The grievance was that people where freaking out, and I pointed out it was two tweeters. Not a mob
/r/MensRights10/02/16 12:54 PM
1

I was specifically making fun of them if that's what you mean? That's why I wrote 22pm
/r/MensRights10/02/16 12:52 PM
1

American civilian population* It's the most commonly used in the world
/r/MensRights09/02/16 02:37 PM
2

I was trying to poke fun at the americans, apparently unsuccessfully :P
/r/MensRights09/02/16 06:31 AM
0

Two butthurt tweeters doesn't mean that people freaked out. This is a country were women are lashed and/or beaten if they're perceived to be too friendly with strangers of the opposite sex. There's no reason to make it into a big deal which the article didn't.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 05:38 AM
1

I disagree. Since we're talking about a responsibility I believe it would be discrimination of men to expect them to do more than women. I'm not arguing the legality though. Just stating my position that they were wrong to open up combat roles to women in the first place.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 04:55 AM
2

Why? I'd rather have the media reporting on actual problems in Saudi Arabia than non-issue tumblerina cry babies in the US. Even if it's a non-story like this.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 04:33 AM
2

Sure, but not in combat roles. That's not about gender equality, but safety. They just aren't as capable and when your escort get's turned over by an IED you don't want a 140 lb women who is unable to drag you out of the vehicle an to safety by your side. Don't believe me that men are more capable? Check it yourselves
/r/MensRights09/02/16 04:30 AM
2

It's a short article and pretty straight forward reporting. They first establish what happened, then what the reaction was, and lastly what Starbucks had to say and the reason was. Besides it's not true that there's one which banned men. Women are grouped with families and single men are grouped by themselves. Married men are allowed in the family Starbucks. Just because it's the last line doesn't mean that's automatically wrong; the article only has like 25-30 lines and 2 tweets in giant letter…
/r/MensRights09/02/16 04:21 AM
14

Police Officer: Okay miss, May I inquire as to what you were wearing on the night in question? Woman: GASP! HOW DARE YOU MYSAAAHGOOONYYY! Later at the scene of the crime Officer Excuse me miss, but did you see Sara here at 22pm last night? Witness: Who is Sara? Officer Erhmm, Did you see a woman walking down the street? Witness: There were quite a few someone had a party a few houses over, can you tell me what she was wearing or something? Officer: "gulp"
/r/MensRights09/02/16 03:34 AM
5

It's Saudi Arabia not Montreal. Local law dictates gender separation what where they supposed to do?
/r/MensRights09/02/16 03:25 AM
6

I would be pissed off too. A 4 year-old should not be making this kind of decision. Gun vs. Needle doesn't really matter. Needle is better IMO, since guns are more prone to mechanical failure, but in both cases it's rare.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 03:18 AM
15

He is probably talking about the discussion about legal paternal surrender for men. Often we see the argument that men should just learn to "rubber up" even if the article is pertaining to instances where women stole sperm from a rubber. Often stating that "it takes two to tango" and therefore men need to take (at minimum) financial responsibility for their offspring if the woman wants to keep the baby. OP is asking why anyone could give that argument when the other side of the coin would be tha…
/r/MensRights09/02/16 03:07 AM
3

We can argue semantics if you want, but I think it's rather clear which kind of corruption I'm referring to. If you want an example try asking any Romanian about that nightclub that burned down. They'll know what you're talking about. If you're not Romanian though and thinking "What?!" Then you can read here how a fire in a nightclub led to the government stepping down.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 11:41 PM
6

queue the feminist brigade crying that female homeless all of a sudden can't go to the same shelters as the men because they're dangerous predators and calling for the conversion of shelters to be all female so facilities end up half empty while people freeze and starve.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:02 PM
92

Oh yeah. Don't worry guys, feminism is totally fighting for you too. Unless something positive happens for men, then it's time to have a discussion on why we didn't focus on women instead. For anyone interested the picture this idiot paints of Romania is very wrong. My girlfriend is a lovely Romanian girl and she firstly thought it was a great idea when they cemented men's day, but also have pointed out to me many times (in different words) that the problems the country unfortunately still faces…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 06:57 PM
3

Then you'll have to move or seek help from somewhere further away. There's no easy way to recover from mental issues. It takes a great deal of support, and it's best if that support comes from a trained professional.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:09 AM
6

There's nothing to do other than seeking professional help. Sorry. That's the hard reality.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 06:49 AM
2

I've not commented on this post until now since I felt a duty to read through the comments to ensure my potential questions hadn't already been answered. However after doing so I must admit that I do not understand why it's stickied. There's barely any discussion in the comment section most of the questions are responded to with non-answers and OP seems to abandon comment threads that are hard to answer or which obviously are unfavorable to her position. In any event; her answer to everything se…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 05:18 AM
6

Everything you need to know: Good white-collar job with a 7-1 ratio of men to women? Horrible discrimination needs quota's. Shitty manual labor with a 99-1 ratio of men to women? Perfectly acceptable considering it's a horrible job women shouldn't be forced to do.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:46 PM
11

Best news all day. No more of this rapist on twitter. What is there to complain about?
/r/MensRights05/02/16 05:51 AM
12

That's /r/fatpeoplehate but with us.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 05:01 AM
6

You can't. Feminists will fight for women to be the only gender seen as victims till the bitter end.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 04:46 PM
13

Well considering who is posted in the picture it's fairly certain that your friend is some combination of stupid and ill informed.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 04:41 PM
1

Note that this is purely speculation and would be a cool plan though I don't believe it went down like this. Okay so far so good. Let me just propose an alternative theory: What if Feminism held several goals for the CIA; some of which failed and are ultimately coming to fruition now? Let's look at a similar game plan. It's the end of the 60'ies, the US is fighting a war of attrition in Vietnam with no end in sight. The Communist side has just launched the largest offensive to date the Tet offen…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 06:45 AM
1

How the hell did I never check if \r\conspiracy was a thing?! OMG I'm there! no sarcasm. I find things like this utterly fascinating.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 05:30 AM
1

I'm not talking about conspiracy theories I think they get a bad rep. However just speculating; what do you think the odds are that Steinem worked for the CIA spying on Marxists as they claim. The CIA was increasingly engaged in fighting war protesters during that period, groups which were mainly Marxist, Lenin-esque and Communist in ideology and basically created by the Communist party's influence.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 05:18 AM
1

You know what, I'll bite. I enjoy speculation as much as the next guy, and I have an inkling of an idea of what could have been a motive for backing the feminist movement and in particular the Steinem brand of feminism. However first. Do we know to which extent the CIA backed her and her movement?
/r/MensRights04/02/16 04:55 AM
-1

Upvoted for giving me the chuckles :D
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:22 AM
11

Don't start people. This is fine. The current conversation is about women being allowed in all combat roles, it's only right a woman is in the foreground of this doodle. There are plenty of shitty doodles out there, the one with a single white male in the background on veterans day to name one. Combat deaths has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 12:50 AM
1

Will definitely check out the study, thanks. It goes well with what I've been saying for years whenever someone brings up the "men are pigs and biologically inclined to cheat to spread their seed cause no pregnancy" argument. I've consistently replied that women has the same issue in the need to reproduce with the perceived superior man. Note that I use the word "perceived" as I think it's causing a lot of issues today. Anyone who's ever stood on a stage for any kind of performance will now that…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 12:08 AM
2

proving once again that it's mostly women who "slutshame" other women I guess.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:29 PM
8

Implying that if it was Bernadette Sanders vs Hillary they wouldn't vote for the burn without a second thought. I'd rather see Trump in the white house than Hillary. At least he is honest about being a horrible human being.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 09:16 PM
3

Can you write here, specifically why you cannot report her to the police?
/r/MensRights03/02/16 08:37 PM
27

As a Dane I call upon my most powerful curse to befall this woman: May she forever step on lego
/r/MensRights03/02/16 08:27 PM
2

In Denmark 3 DNA testing clinics told the newspapers that 33% of the tests proved that the men weren't in fact the fathers. One of the had done at least 2000 tests that year. Meaning if you are in doubt the chance increases 200%.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 08:17 PM
1

Exactly. That must be the first step.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 08:15 PM
1

That's not really true. Most European countries have something similar to it. In Denmark it's called "grundloven" Basically called the "Law of the Foundation" The issue is that we don't hold it to such the same gold standard as Americans due. Right now there's a lawsuit against the Danish Church minister for allowing gay's to marry in the church citing that it's unconstitutional (i.e against the rights in "grundloven") naturally it's going to lose because the churches are mostly owned by the sta…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 08:15 PM
1

Sure, but to be fair in Denmark the cities that hosts the drafted's women are notorious for hooking up with them too. It makes sense as the guys are usually physically fit and they leave after some months so there will only be judgement if she tells her friends.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 08:12 PM
1

Well for them it isn't, but it's still 9 months of forced labor if you don't want to do it.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 08:09 PM
3

Are you sure, looking a wikipedia which I know is perhaps not the most reliable under "Rumney" You'll see a study from 2005 named Kelly et al. Which states: 3% ("possible" and "probable" false allegations) 22% (recorded by police as "no-crime") Looking at the actual study it get's even more confusing, but explains somewhat that studies are problematic as they rely on police data which is often unfinished, or inconclusive. DOJ can't do much if the source data is corrupted. Not only are studies of…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 05:42 AM
3

One problem with such a demand is that once a charge is dropped it's rarely investigated whether it was false or simply unprovable, meaning that the number would either be high due to all cases dropped or low due to few cases being investigated; Guess which one it will be... I think the first step must be to investigate whether claims that initially are unprovable, in fact only are unprovable from one perspective. i.e that they're definitively false when investigated with the assumption of innoc…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 04:12 AM
1

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. Women already have the right to legal paternal surrender; It's called adoption. Was that your point?
/r/MensRights02/02/16 04:44 PM
1

In Denmark it's a little different as adoptive children has the right the know the identity of their biological parents when they reach adulthood (18 years).
/r/MensRights02/02/16 04:42 PM
3

It's takes too much power away from women, remember; it's not about equal rights, but about increasing rights for women.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 04:53 PM
1

I've been repeatedly making these arguments in the comments too, however I feel like we should look at this like a step forward rather than dismiss it as not enough. Rights often come in increments.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 03:57 PM
1

Thanks man! :D
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:25 PM
2

Yup, Good to see you here mate.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 01:01 PM
2

Biased reporting. Looking at the original article the scientists state the the diminished masculinity is pure guesswork. Other than that this is just another in a long line of "statistics" which are reported on before the numbers come out to create a buzz. 105 men? Such sample, much wow! Other than the obvious white knights and ideologically driven feminists they're not fooling anyone.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 11:11 AM
13

EDIT: Please note that this article is trying to start a debate about legal paternal surrender in cases where the man was defrauded or tricked. Not everything we've hoped for, but a damn good start, and a very happy surprise to wake up to Should a man could renounce paternity if a woman tricks him into having a child against his will? Philosophers and theologians have different views on the matter, while the population is positive about the idea. A woman claims she uses birth control pills and d…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 10:35 AM
13

I was under the impression that Meninism actually wasn't a "real" thing. That it was a sort of caricature of feminism. Making fun of the double standards and batshit crazy non-logic
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:48 PM
1

At least on youtube there's not really a great cost to it. You're not literally taking away someones job to do it.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:44 PM
3

The most infuriating part though is, that had he died the article would probably be lambasting men for joining in the rape culture and only mention in passing that he fricken died trying to protect her. It's a damned if you do damned if don't world for men out there.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:43 PM
1

Basically this. There's a small study that suggests branding has a large influence too I imagine there are many studies that'll mirror this however I'm currently too lazy to go searching "The answers to question 3 in that 70 % of the men surveyed seldom or never were inspired by a celebrity look, whereas 90 % of the ladies were" "Questions 7 and 8 relate to favourite celebrity influences with a substantial majority of ladies saying they were positively influenced, whilst the men were the opposit…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:56 AM
16

"Leading" women of youtube; not one video has over 2 million views.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:40 AM
1

Do with I did, use a website to download it as a mp4
/r/MensRights28/01/16 03:17 AM
3

I strongly advice reading the comments on the actual article though. Everyone seems in agreement that the article is disgusting.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 03:08 AM
0

I don't really care about what you said. If you want to be a feminist then go ahead.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 06:08 PM
0

Aren't you just projecting? There's already one such (e)book I'd also add that there's no false equivalence when you account for the qualifier. In case you missed it, it was Don't do the feminist hypersensitive double morale
/r/MensRights27/01/16 05:22 PM
3

I agree. There are plenty of material on both sides that could be inflammatory from the perspective of ideology.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:55 PM
1

Wasn't it something like a need for settlers and an unfavorable ratio of females to males that spurred Wyoming into action? The suffrage movement was mainly women arguing with other women about rights and responsibilities. Half of them saw it as a right, the other half as a responsibility; I believe one of the presidents of the time said: "I won't give you cunts the vote until you agree you want it" I'm paraphrasing of course. Don't remember the exact quote
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:41 PM
1

Think back to when the women where fighting for the vote and the answer becomes very clear to you. White knights will be enlisted to lynch any man accused of raping a women. In many way's this is already happening although it's a less literal lynching and more of an internet and media one. "Mob justice" is now called "Social justice" and while it's become unpopular to point the finger at black men it's become proportionally popular to do it at white men.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:50 AM
6

I agree that the article is sad. It's not even the rapid escalation that's bothering me, but the entire framework that I'm opposed to. It should be obvious to anyone that the specific thing (not putting the glass in the dishwasher) is meant to be a symbol for any little thing a man might do that annoys his wife. The message? As a man it's always you who has to compromise Anything your wife finds annoying? Stop doing it. Any difference of opinion? Assimilate yourself and most important of all! If…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:07 AM
2

What is?
/r/MensRights25/01/16 08:58 AM
2

Well to be fair the info-graphic didn't make any mention of gender that part was heavily implied, but you cannot really create such a simplistic graphic and account for both genders the data is too different. If we only concern ourselves with men I suspect among other things that the falsely accused number will drastically diminish as men don't tend to falsely accuse women of rape.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 08:03 PM
12

A user did a great graphic on this just on face value. The falsely accused are not grouped with the reported The "unreported" (ie. Rapist) category is purely speculation and doesn't belong in an info-graphic and should be removed. The "Jailed" category should be changed to "Rapists" The "Faced Trial" category should be merged with the "Reported" category. The reported category should be changed to "inconclusive" The median should be used to determine the falsely accused not the lowest value (The…
/r/MensRights22/01/16 05:48 PM
1

It's a learning disability. The disable part is kinda implied even if it doesn't reach the levels of more serious ailments. Though perhaps if Hillary had hired a 12 year-old earlier in her campaign she'd have had someone on staff with the mental capacity to go: "No, love, don't choose the logo that looks like you're flying a plane into WTC"
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:30 PM
1

Correct you are. When I initially read through the article I for some reason read it as him sending the pictures to her to taunt her. Naturally when the pictures aren't legally acquired the situation changes.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 02:27 PM
1

I don't mind looking at a nice cock from time to time either.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 02:24 PM
1

These laws are silly to begin with, if someone gives you a naked picture is the picture not now yours? Should you not be able to give what is yours to someone else? I at least don't understand what their purpose is, but if the intent was determined to be revenge rather than sexual and since it's established that the victims in some regards provoked the reaction, it's understandable that the sentence would be reduced.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:03 PM
8

Remember that freedom being taken and animosity being created isn't something that happens overnight, but rather in increments. fight vigorously against every small change they try to implement and be polite, but adamant in the assertion that this is not a political fora and that if they want to have that type of discussions they should take it elsewhere so it doesn't take time away from the hobby and purpose of your meetings.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 03:03 PM
1

Sure it is kid. Why don't you log off now, it's dangerous to use ones entire vocabulary in a two minute time-frame.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 01:04 PM
1

Counter-question: If someone doesn't have the balls to insult the people on this sub with their real account. Is it then A. Because it's a woman who is scared because she can't control her feelings and has been told by radical feminists that everyone is out to get her, or B. A man who is scared because he's been neutered by the radical feminist movement?
/r/MensRights13/01/16 12:54 PM
4

Yes, it's also offensive as fuck! However were they to be called on it in a force great enough to make them comment they'd probably just say; "It's a joke, just a joke; why can't men ever take a simple joke" It's become such a farce that whenever you call institutions out on their shitty behavior towards men they regress to the same argument as thirteen year-old morons on youtube who go up to black people on the street and call them "niggers" then don't understand why their anger isn't dulled by…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 12:40 PM
0

Not exactly. Oppression is a cornerstone of terrorism. The Daesh now are much like an extreme version of the suffragettes. People who has been oppressed their whole lives trying to fight for their freedom the only way they know how to; through the medium of violence. In truth the women fighting back then were never oppressed merely without representation something they shared with many men back in those days. The terrorists we hear about today however misguided in their actions are at least unde…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 02:09 AM
9

Meaningless platitude that everyone already agrees is or should be status quo. Legitimate issue regarding reproductive rights however misguided the formulation of the argument is, also the post is a meaningless platitude. It does nothing to change anything and is just there to garner the disapproval of the forum. Pathetic. Feminism now defines everything you direct at a women in public as harassment. This is basically a chart saying "Don't say anything to strangers in public; ever" Legitimate is…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:42 AM
1

I already made this point in my first comment.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 01:08 PM
1

I've been on holiday for awhile so the answer is late, but the crime I've referred to here should obviously be sex with a minor. And no, if you have a sexually legal 18-teen year old then it's none of your business who she or he chooses to fuck. Regardless of whether you hired them or not. Unless you specified it in a contract or something.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 11:29 PM
2

There's a matter of the age of consent in the given state too. For me, living in a country where the age of consent is 15. The idea that she should be charged with a crime for having sex with someone who is legally a consenting adult is absurd. The fact that she abused her position and the trust placed in her by the parents are clear. She should lose her job. However I must concede my opinions to the age of consent laws in the country. In California I believe it's 18 with the crime being potenti…
/r/MensRights20/12/15 12:45 PM
0

Another swing and a miss. I'm not blaming all of anything on the parents. I'm asserting that the parents are part of the problem (and solution) What do you mean What "equation" are you faking stupidity in order to dismiss arguments? The issue of education and how the variable aspects affect it so that one can create a better educational system. Your apparently asserting that everything wrong with the educational system is female bias which is just as moronic as saying everything wrong with the w…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:38 PM
2

No. The bell curve isn't dismissed because some people drop out of school and still succeed. Many of the people on that list probably fall into either the entertainment industry or on the high end of the bell curve scale. Dropping out does not equal low IQ. As for your assertion that you see nothing invented by women as you drive "coast to coast" could that not just be because you assume everything you see is invented by men? Is there a heating unit in your car? A woman invented that. Do you hav…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:15 PM
1

And that was specifically my point.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:32 PM
1

I'm sorry, but ideology seem to be completely blinding you from any issue not related to male discrimination. Of course there are plenty of smart boys that are high-achievers and they certainly should be part of the equation when we talk about the overall effectiveness of the educational system. There are also plenty of valid reasons for why parents are an important part of education, and just as many reasons why they need to take part of the blame. Unless you're asserting that education isn't p…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:31 PM
2

Well, boy's are stupid, and smart. The thing is that when you talk about intelligence in men and women and compare the data on a bell curve intelligence is basically the same. However the data shows that men dominate the high end as well as the low end of the curve, meaning that in the high end of IQ there are a great deal more men than women and the same goes for the low end. As for the American education system: The first group of people you have to blame is the parents. There are studies that…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 02:33 PM
14

It matters little. In Norway they've done similar things such as increasing ads for male dominated educations aimed at women. You see a short and small spike in enrollment while they're running, but the women switch educations and the enrollment normalizes quickly
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:48 PM
7

Basically, which is the reason for my continued advice to consult with a psychiatrist.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 07:46 AM
4

Where have I heard those arguments before...? 1: Gender DOES matter - Feminism when debating things such as gender quotas and gendered occupations such as firemen. 2: ethics are separate from logic - Feminism when arguing their feelings are more important than evidence Ethics and logic might be separate issues, but that does not make them mutually exclusive, as an example you can create laws based on both logic and ethos. Your over fixation on you not being good enough seems to have created an u…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 07:04 AM
12

You are forgetting that the only thing Hillary has going for her in the election is her gender, and that she will leverage that any way she can to attract female voters. She doesn't believe anything she says, it's just crafted to attract as many voters as possible.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 06:33 AM
8

My gender doesn't really matter, however I'm a man. My problem is ethical as well as logical the two aren't mutually exclusive. As for your existence you are a parasite tagging along, just instead of attaching yourself to a social circle you've attached yourself to an arguably unhealthy and fake identity. You're not part of a social circle; your persona is. It's like taking a mirror to a restaurant and calling it a dinner for two.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 06:27 AM
10

So you're acting disingenuous because school was though... Consult with a psychiatrist The way you view the world is increasingly delusional. Your rhetoric reeks of of red pill nonsense. It's an ideology comparable in contrast to feminism. Utilizing the same methodology of deceit and dis-ingenuousness. It will make you increasingly unhappy with your life and the world, and it will become harder and harder to distance yourself from the sort of thinking that continuously makes you unhappy.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:39 AM
7

I can clearly read that you aren't "alpha" a term you would care little about if you truly are an existentialist. Asserting control and creating a pecking order is not the same thing as garnering respect. All that makes you is an ordinary bully, pressing the issues and putting someone down in order to raise yourself up. If this makes you happy I would recommend consulting with a psychiatrist. If you find that it does not make you happy, but rather "content" with people then I would suggest you c…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:06 AM
2

This is the fourth time the video is posted today, please check the "new" page before posting. Great video though, just finished it.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 04:37 AM
10

Honestly not trying to offend, but from my perspective you have none of the desired qualities of masculinity and much of the "dudebro" mentality that young men who doesn't understand how to deal with emotions display. You should reevaluate your life. This mentality will not bring you happiness. Viewing women as children and therefore absolving them of responsibility and blaming oneself for allowing others actions rather than understanding that not all people are nice people and making rational d…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:22 AM
1

If we vote no we're out of Europol, but there will probably be made a provision to include us after. I'm not voting yes. Like you I dislike the way the election has been promoted and I don't like signing a blank check for future EU decisions.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:09 AM
6

Apostate. Misogynists are apostates.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 12:48 AM
2

Because women are what garners sympathy. I'm a Dane and this election is a pain in the ass. The short version is that if we vote yes we stay in the "Interpol" agreement which tracks crime such as human trafficking across EU borders, so it doesn't really matter what the sign say's - Voting yes will mean we continue to collaborate on international crime which includes trafficking of both men and women.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 12:39 AM
1

Your question is tricky, short answer; yes. Long answer: In Denmark child support is something created based on the belief that you have a responsibility to pay for your offspring. The way it's handled is either 1. You and your partner makes an agreement sends it to the state and that is that, or 2. The state decides how much you pay although it's not based on the same rate system as America. The amounts are semi-fixed unless you make a lot of money and even then it's not a percentage of your sa…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 08:37 PM
15

Fingers crossed that they decide she has to. I'd very much like to read them and I am of the conviction that there's something quite damning in them.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 08:24 PM
6

What do you expect when you make news that rely on advertising and corporate backing to survive? Naturally it's going to be emotional drivel that play's fast and loose with the truth.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 08:09 PM
100

Men not shaving their beards? "Not practicing basic facial hygiene" Women not shaving their armpits? Beautiful, empowered, natural and clean.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 08:02 PM
2

In my country (Denmark) If you deny that you're the father of a child and the mother say's you are, it's taken to court which then decides whether it's necessary to take a paternity test. In that regard it rarely happens that someone is forced to pay if he isn't the father. It's also worth noting that child-support is "backed" by the state in the sense that if the man cannot pay(or doesn't) the mother can get the money from the state which will then attempt to collect. The way this works is natu…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 07:53 PM
7

It's not like say HALF of sexual misconduct cases regarding prisons involve female employees.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 07:34 PM
114

“but comparing women's incarceration rate to that for men paints a falsely optimistic picture.” Women face gender-specific brutality in prisons, including rape by prison authorities, shackling during labor, and inferior medical care. Are you fucking kidding me?
/r/MensRights21/11/15 10:58 AM
1

Now I admit to going through her history and while she strikes me as a person who would ever come here, don't you think it's an odd sort of rationale to invite her to come and then post screenshots in an attempt to ridicule her? I'm not going to tell you what to do, but having the understanding of how ideologies often program people (check this 4chan user explain his/her story) I would be careful of reaffirming anyone's idea that we are "the enemy" I completely understand the compulsion to post …
/r/MensRights21/11/15 12:41 AM
1

What's the point of crossing out the username if you don't do it every time? Can clearly see the name "Babycakes_Melissa"
/r/MensRights21/11/15 12:14 AM
4

Yes, in another article. A firm say's that roughly 70% of the one the roughly 1500 who wants anonymous DNA testing are women who are in doubt if the child is from a lover or the husband. What is even more frustrating is that it's being laid out as "no good can come of this knowledge, it will lead to divorce and families breaking up" and "When men find out they're not the biological father they split up the family and what happens to the poor children"? Well what about the poor goddamn men? Their…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 09:28 PM
2

State Administration of Southern Denmark had last year ranked 142 determine paternity through DNA tests. This corresponds to about one in thirteen paternity, and the number is nearly 40 percent higher than in 2007, writes JydskeVestkysten Thursday. The men want to be sure and use increasingly that we have been given the opportunity to establish paternity with DNA analysis, explains Head Tine Bjerre from the state administration's family law department. There are also several examples of men who …
/r/MensRights20/11/15 07:19 PM
6

This pisses me of so much. Perhaps It's because I'm a Dane and lego is something we're brought up with. My mother literally has boxes of me and my brothers old lego's in the cellar because she quote "can't wait to one day be a grandmother and have toddlers crawling around on her floor playing with them again" unquote. To my mother having kids playing with lego's is one of the greatest joys that exists, and this (excuse my language) idiotic cunt is denying kids access to this wonderful toy and us…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 01:49 AM
1

I agree. The thing about this sort of extremism is that whatever religion might motivate it's general members, be it Judaism, Islam or Christianity. That religion from the perspective of the leaders of the movement is little more than a tool. Rallying religious extremists is an effective way of recruiting the sort of people who will commit violence on civilians. When a country such as say... ...France then retaliates the extremists leaders can incite the local population of the now attacked area…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:26 AM
11

It's not really a double standard. Jokes like these work because of the initial "shock" once you've gotten over the surprise of the first one the impact of the second isn't going to be as strong. Also; who gives a shit about jokes? Other than obviously feminists.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 01:38 PM
1

Falling in love is easy man, people do it by accident and with horrible people. Sure, staying together is the true test of a relationship, but once you've formed a strong emotional bond, that bond might be more important than other less present issues. Chances are that at some point in a relationship you're going to find issues, aesthetic or otherwise that you disagree on, hell! Chances are you'll do so multiple times. Suddenly a new box appeared on your spreadsheet and it's unchecked by default…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 11:41 PM
1

From the American perspective this comment is both eerily accurate, completely on point and in my opinion very underrated.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 11:29 PM
1

Sounds like a keeper :) Me and my girlfriend doesn't live together, but we share a very similar sense of style too, so I don't think it will ever be a problem if we get to that point.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:55 PM
1

Interesting point about the toddler. However I got lost from my parents for an hour at six in the middle of the city and guess what happened? When I finally drummed up the courage to ask someone for help they dropped me off at the first store so I could call home where my grandfather was waiting by the phone while my parents were searching. (This was in '96 before cellphones were really a thing) The charge "Child abandonment" implies she gave up or left her kids for good or in an extreme circums…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:53 PM
5

I've already seen that episode of Survivor. I know how it ends: With men moving in and fixing everything.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:47 PM
2

Are Americans really that paranoid? I'm genuinely asking because that didn't seem like satire.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:09 AM
37

The "man-cave" isn't a special room awarded to men so that they may escape their responsibilities. It's a hole men and all their stuff is banished to when women move in with their 500+ decorative pillows, their flowery curtains and their overly bright colors named after fish. The reason women don't have a damn man-cave is because the entire house is in their controlling hands. Even in the aptly named man-"cave" the promise of a moments solitude is short lived as your woman will periodically ente…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 02:57 AM
3

My Girlfriend and me calls each other babe, honey and other such names all the time, you can't tell me what to do. Also; can someone explain to me how "babe" is different from "dude" in the way they're currently being used? And why the fuck did they both pick "Officer" as an acceptable call name? I didn't know bullshit language-police forces had ranks that conveyed authority. Do I also have to point out that "babe", "sweetheart" and "honey" aren't gendered words. They can be used by anyone, to d…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 05:43 PM
1

Why not just google then? there are plenty of matches.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 05:27 PM
2

So what? There's like a gazillion facebook pages that are "women only" what's the difference?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 10:58 PM
1

I'll give him the last two frames aswell.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 02:53 PM
5

It's on the hot page mate.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 02:36 PM
1

Yeah I don't think so. I don't like the idea of just leaving peoples contact info here and especially without asking first. It could potentially put a target on their back.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 01:52 PM
5

Seems like the same borderline childabuse as it's always been. What am I missing?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 01:44 PM
6

I understand how people can become frustrated however I don't think that posts like this is in any way constructive.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 01:09 AM
14

Careful now guys. I seem to remember this video of a guy running around and touching a 1000 breasts without much difficulty or this one doing it with a hundred. The 1000 boob guy had consent from everyone he touched and he comments that he had around 7000 rejections. (for those who don't like math that means that 1 in 8 women in Russia will let you fondle her if you ask politely) and while I understand how that could make a difference I don't think that this women ran around touching people with…
/r/MensRights19/07/15 07:14 PM
2

Doesn't matter. Handling a gun is an easily acquired skill and yes I am speaking from experience. Sure you're not going to be a perfect shot after a week, but if I had to fight 5 women and I had the choice between everyone having a baseball bat and everyone having a gun I know what I'd prefer.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 03:23 AM
11

Oh man. As a Dane I almost hope this succeeds. I'd bet you it'll be good for our economy when swedes take the ferry over to buy cheap beer and porn.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:26 AM
-2

You do understand that the second amendment is a detriment to you in this case. Having superior physical strength is your advantage. When you introduce guns into the equation you're basically leveling the playing field.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:00 AM
3

k
/r/MensRights27/06/15 10:27 PM
3

I'll bite - How do you defend being a feminist when your own dogma say's that gendered terms are wrong. Also what exactly do you think feminism ever did for anyone?
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:13 PM
1

I feel like in most cases the volume difference is because men usually sacrifice quality for quantity, but I might be wrong. However it's not just that women are able to buy the stuff made for men, there's also plenty of cheap unisex products.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 08:54 PM
0

Sigh. I think we're done here. Go troll someone else kid.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 01:23 PM
1

No. I made an assumption based on what type of RP I thought was most prevalent and then tailored the question to be as relevant as possible. You made the assumption that you know the intent of my action, and also implied that I should've "learned" from your lack of ability to argue the point.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 12:51 PM
1

Nothing I've written is incoherent, the issue seems to be with you cherry picking what you want to respond to in order to fit it into your argument and then being rude when I tell you your arguments are invalid. Let's try this question again since it wasn't as simple as "how it could be illegal" The question was: "How can it be illegal to share pictures you have been given ownership over?" Do you now see the difference?
/r/MensRights26/06/15 12:24 PM
0

If you lack a good argument it is okay to admit so. There's no need for unpleasantness or passive-aggressiveness. I have no problem understanding the concept, however I don't see how it's relevant to the example provided, or how any of the examples given are comparable to someone giving another person a picture.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:57 AM
5

Between material created for commercial use and sharing a private picture.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:08 AM
2

An example pertaining to RP obviously. There's an inherent difference.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:42 AM
2

Please provide an example.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:10 AM
3

I think you're confusing revenge porn with something else. The operative word in that sentence is given; which is why I didn't write "taken ownership over"
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:01 AM
0

That's not completely true. It's not true that women's deodorant is more expensive. When you look at designer products the price is the same there's just more products aimed at women which are expensive and more products aimed at men which are cheap. This is the segmentation and it's completely fair as businesses should cater to their demographic. However there's no one prohibiting women from buying the cheaper products or even buying men's products; If women started buying cheaper cosmetic's th…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 09:08 AM
7

Regardless the issue of "revenge porn" seems immature as a concept. How can it be illegal to share pictures you have been given ownership over? Mind you; not that I would do it myself, but if any pics of me (and there are quite a few out there) was viewed/used by by the people I associated it would be a breach of trust - not of the law.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:10 AM
1

Yes. Because it's a higher price for a higher quality service; as i said.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 10:44 PM
1

From the article they seem like traditionalists; although it's genderflipped from the western traditionalism that feminism originally fought against.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 07:32 PM
3

It is; gender discrimination relies on quality of service and/or product, if the service being offered is of higher quality it's against the law.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 07:15 PM
1

That's a thing that happen.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 10:19 PM
2

Are you perhaps confusing the word "many" for "mostly"
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:07 PM
1

Will happily provide data, but not sure what you're questioning. That some games are mostly male dominated or that some games are catered specifically to men? edit: spelling
/r/MensRights12/06/15 11:19 AM
6

Every time I hear some woman bitching about sexism in videogames it's always because someone called them a mean thing and they're a woman so it's gotta be sexism right? right? Well ad hoc ergo propter hoc bitches. Everyone receives hate online while playing multiplayer games, and since the goal of flaming is to hit someone as hard as possible the insults are going to be tailored to be as personal as possible. That means women get's questioned on their commitment to the game and called sluts and …
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:37 AM
7

Something being a male space doesn't necessarily come down to exclusion. The fact that a game is 95% male dominated makes it a male space inherently. bathrooms can be male spaces, but that doesn't stop women from entering them if there's a line at theirs.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:20 AM
4

I don't know about the innate urge, but gaming is very much a male space. It's not just that the majority of gamers are male excluding the cutesy app-games from facebook and phones. It's that games are created for and catered to specific genders. Which means that many games inherently are malespaces by virtue of the userbase they where created for
/r/MensRights11/06/15 05:36 AM
3

You're assuming that people don't have to leave the venue, which is unlikely because; A: "Crowded transit settings turned out to be among the worst places for groping incidents, so Hollaback Vancouver partnered with Transit Police to respond. The idea is somewhat similar with nightclubs, Forrester told The Province." And B: "The idea is not to issue a “pass or fail” or “call out” certain clubs, Forrester said, but to establish working relationships with club staff." Which points to them wanting …
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:33 AM
3

Chuckled over the silliness of the title. Then facepalmed over the misrepresented meaning of James Brown; then sighed when I saw another dumbass implying that basic socialization equals feminization instead of it just being the basic function of living in a tribe. Also as /u/perfectdesign states: ad hoc ergo propter hoc
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:18 AM
1

Murica' Rifle Association - Clearly
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:03 AM
3

You missed the entire point of both arguments. The first argument is that nothing can be done about harassment without a permanent way to ensure anyone who has been found doing it is no longer let into the venue. Fingerprint scanners are one way to ensure that, however first timers might still violate the terms in which case no place can ever be 100% harassment free. The second point was that "non-consent" was a dubious word that easily could mean that these women walk around and report men that…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:52 AM
3

Well for the most part it's a lack of intelligence on their part. Bars with women attract men, and if a bar gets a bad reputation and the women start avoiding it then the men migrate to wherever the women now are. Unless you guys have gotten fingerprint scanners are the entrance of every bar there's always going to be men who are inappropriate. Furthermore; the troubling thing about this isn't the idea of women working together with nightclubs to make the experience less harassing. The troubling…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:05 AM
0

Here's the thing: If you want police shootings to go down. You have to take away the guns. Not talking about restrictions. Not talking about assault weapons, I am talking about a national gun ban. Why does this work? Well for the first part there's going to be a sharp reduction in death by cop cases. Without the ability to threaten a police officer with a gun the chance that he resorts to shooting rather than taze or pebberspray lessons. Paranoia: Often when I read on the news that someone has b…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 02:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter