Cell-el Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
30	Boys don't count....Over and over time the question comes... Are men obsolete for the society? I believe it's from the new UN study they just finished last month. It was the first known study to ever be done on the subject of child grooms. Edit: Here's the UN breakdown. https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/06/1039971	/r/MensRights	30/07/19 03:25 PM
-1	The differences in communication between feminists and MRAs Appeal to the sane and rational, expose the truth. Normal women are predominantly blue, and they will listen if they feel you on an emotional or human level. Then they aren't really rational. The problem with this kind of approach is that it's based on emotional exploitation. So the win will go to whoever is willing to be the most exploitative. Feminism can just as easily win them back through the same means, and they have a bigger advantage than you. They're also (hopefully) willing to whore th…	/r/MensRights	01/07/19 02:24 AM
10	We have to show how misandrist feminism can be so women stop turning to feminism The problem is that most women seem to like being infantilized. The challenge is not in making women realize that feminism is treating them like children. The challenge is in making most women want to start being adults. So far the best we've got is that most women at least pretend they want to be treated like adults.	/r/MensRights	17/05/19 10:59 PM
1	The paradox of feminism Again, I am talking about the facts and laws based on my country (India), here is how the rape laws were made and changed:- https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2018/08/indias-anti-rape-laws-the-evolution/ and as long as the unfair child custody laws are concerned These are the rape laws that do not include men, correct? The ones that feminists in India have specifically fought against making gender neutral? I think you sort of lost the plot here. You're supposed to be arguing that feminism is about equ…	/r/MensRights	06/05/19 03:00 AM
2	The paradox of feminism No,the reason it's irrelevant because anyone can vote regardless whether they serve in military or not(at least in my country they do). Now yes. Not when feminists advocated for the vote however. Feminists had nothing to do with the fact that everyone can now vote without service. What feminists advocated for was the vote without service, and is what they got until very recently. Which still is not equal as in america and most countries men must register for the draft before they can vote. They …	/r/MensRights	05/05/19 10:41 PM
4	The paradox of feminism The example you have given is irrelevant Why? How is it irrelevant when it directly contradicts your claim and is factually true? and the 'special priviledges' is something that has created problems rather then solving them I agree. However that is what you asked for. We just asked for equality not to be treated specially. No you didn't. You never have. Which was the entire point of my example that you find to somehow be irrelevant. You have never sought equality in more than name. We can go thr…	/r/MensRights	05/05/19 10:09 PM
7	The paradox of feminism No. It started out from giving women special priviledges. Like being able to vote without having to serve in wartime. I want to be treated equal to a male not as his superior or inferior. No, you don't. You want to be treated equal to a theoretical male that exists only in your head. If you were actually treated as the equal to a man you wouldn't like it in the least.	/r/MensRights	05/05/19 09:50 PM
11	As a woman, Feminism now has a negative connotation, No. It always did. They used to write childrens books like "12 Little Suffragettes" to teach girls not to grow up to be bitter man-hating harpies like them. In discussion over womens rights to vote one of the major arguments used against giving women the vote was the behaviour of feminists. The anti-suffragette movement (that is the women who were against the draft) alone was three times bigger than them. No one has ever liked feminism. Including women. I…	/r/MensRights	29/04/19 12:01 AM
16	As a woman, There is a lot of anti men sentiment in radical feminism. No. There is a lot of anti-men sentiment in feminism. You are either being dishonest or are ignorant of the subject. Nearly every promiment feminist ever has been a blatant misandrist. Every single aspect of feminist theory I have ever seen is explicitly designed to denigrade men. The Declaration of Sentiments, the very first feminist manifesto, openly demonized men. Feminism is built upon the hatred of men. Flat-out. I 100% acknowledge t…	/r/MensRights	28/04/19 10:45 PM
19	As a woman, There's nothing stopping men and women from working together. It's feminism and men that cannot work together. Because feminism is a hate group. Whites and blacks can work together perfectly well. It's when you involve the Klu Klux Klan or Black Panthers that there starts to be an issue.	/r/MensRights	28/04/19 10:14 PM
6	An interesting video, which can hopefully help everyone find some common ground You really cant get it through your head that feminists don't hate men, huh? Then why is every single prominent feminist a man-hating bigot? Why is every aspect of feminist theory anti-male? Seriously, how many aspects of feminist theory can you name that are not against men? If man-hating feminism is so rare then how can it possess the control and influence over the movement that it does? And since they do control the movement, why should anyone care if there aren't any man-hating feminists? Cl…	/r/MensRights	28/04/19 10:10 PM
4	An interesting video, which can hopefully help everyone find some common ground Hate groups don't have common grounds. Just burial grounds.	/r/MensRights	28/04/19 10:07 PM
4	An interesting video, which can hopefully help everyone find some common ground 1- it stops the stereotype of white people bring inherently better That's their stereotype however. They are the ones claiming that society views men or whites as better. I've never heard that from anyone else except for other racist groups. 2- if you make a joke about black people being unproductive, that subconsciously affects people. Evidence says otherwise, and even if it does so what? Just about everything you could do could effect others. Black people aren't children that need to be coddle…	/r/MensRights	28/04/19 10:04 PM
4	Feminism was never a good thing. The fact that women faced inequalities which were addressed by feminism is not in any way relevant to the fact that men face inequalities as well. Actually it is, because in order for women to have faced inequalities you need at least one other dataset for comparison. Since you only have two sexes in existence as far as our species go women can only face inequalities if it is in relation to mens inequalities. And vice versa.	/r/MensRights	13/04/19 08:04 PM
4	Feminism was never a good thing. Feminism, for all it's bad traits, fought against this for women, thus some good must be attributed to it. No it didn't. Just to use the vote as an example, feminism only supported the vote for rich white women. In fact most of the suffragettes were white supremacists, many of whom only wanted the vote for women out of concern that black men might get the vote and be able to push for their own issues. Adding white women to the voting pool would make their votes irrelevant, even if they got them.…	/r/MensRights	13/04/19 07:57 PM
5	Feminism was never a good thing. The fact that men were oppressed at the very same time does not diminish women's historical plight Women not having a vote is not oppressive. Because it is neither cruel nor unjust. Men were permitted to vote because of services they provided. Women did not provide those services, hence women could not vote. This is not an injustice. An oppression would be if women DID have to subject themselves to the draft like men did but still didn't the vote. Or if both men and women had the vote but only m…	/r/MensRights	13/04/19 07:47 PM
6	Toxic feminism hurts women too And when a man is 19 and still a virgin he's called a loser, especially by women and feminists who use terms like incel often as a slur. When a woman still has her virginity she's considered pure.	/r/MensRights	07/04/19 05:39 PM
4	Space Suits are now an “equality” issue. btw, why they have to whine and blame the entire world, patriarchy, misogyny, etc. for this as if the entire world planned against them? All the while they themselves are party responsible in this? Who NASA? NASA didn't blame anyone. This sexism blah,blah, is entirely something feminists are conjuring up in their own twisted little heads. They're ignoring the facts and fabricating this insane conspiracy on their own. The astronaut herself has been on Twitter for days calling out Hillary and the …	/r/MensRights	29/03/19 10:51 PM
2	Space Suits are now an “equality” issue. Basically they have two suits in each available size. The suits take a long time to prepare so any suits not being used are stored as spares. Mclain was initially supposed to take the walk in one of the large-size suits with her partner taking the medium. A few days before that however she was on another spacewalk where she had to wear a medium suit and ended up deciding that the medium was a better fit for her. This happens sometimes because the body can change a lot in terms of height and othe…	/r/MensRights	29/03/19 09:09 PM
1	The proof we STILL live in a man's world: Phones too big for our palms, chilly offices, cars designed for male drivers - a fascinating new book reveals the little ways life really is stacked against women I can’t be more specific because I can’t even imagine the justification for this assertion, and I don’t want to give the article clicks. Basically women are on average shorter than men, so tend to lean forward more to drive so they can reach the pedals and still see out. This leads to women being more likely to receive injuries or die if they are involved in a crash. This is because cars are tested with male crash dummies and thus womens sizes are not taken into account. Except they phrase it ev…	/r/MensRights	15/03/19 12:45 AM
1	The gender privilege myth Didn't say anyone would win. But if you provided evidence for your claim it would at least allow you to be taken somewhat seriously. BUT, you don't. And instead we get things like this.	/r/MensRights	28/01/19 04:44 PM
2	The gender privilege myth Do you as a men's right activist want to be judged by the actions of the worst incels and sexist conservative politicians? Those are not necessarily mens rights activists though. Just because you can find someone saying bad things about women doesn't mean they are a mens rights activist. Besides, if you could find an MRA comparable I imagine you would have produced one when I first challenged you.	/r/MensRights	28/01/19 11:43 AM
2	The gender privilege myth Notably none of what you just said had anything to do with my actual points or criticisms. This subreddit is dense as fuck. In other words, you lost the argument.	/r/MensRights	28/01/19 11:28 AM
3	The gender privilege myth Who does that, can you give me a source? Sally Miller Gearhart for one. The woman who founded gender studies. I have read of many men's rights activists that claim that women are inferior to men, that want to go back several hundred years to subjugate women again. Such as? Besides, that wasn't what I asked. I asked if you could find anyone who wanted to reduce the population to 10%. She wrote it in her essay "The Future is Female". “The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at appr…	/r/MensRights	28/01/19 01:27 AM
5	The gender privilege myth You blame feminists when the true enemy of us men are the people that are responsible for and profit from the system. .......Like feminists.	/r/MensRights	27/01/19 11:28 PM
5	The gender privilege myth Well, so does feminism. Yes, but not all movements have the same bad actors. There is a difference, for instance, between a Muslim extremist and an Amish one. A difference bourne out of the different ideologies that shape their world views. Can you find, for instance, anyone in the mens rights movement who says that we must reduce the population of women down to 10%? Because it isn't hard to point out a feminist who says that. And feminism isn't one movement, it has hundreds of different subgrou…	/r/MensRights	27/01/19 11:27 PM
3	Jordan Petersen's fiery interview with feminist Helen Lewis for British GQ She wrote an article about the interview. She's not really being rational or reasonable, she just didn't want to repeat Cathy's behaviour because it would mean he would win. http://archive.is/o7qvK Some highlights. Going into the interview, in a hotel suite in Baltimore, I resolved never to argue that his views were offensive. After all, he thrives on suggesting that feminists, and the left generally, are addicted to grievance politics. Instead, I would argue, he’s simply wrong. and He makes his…	/r/MensRights	02/11/18 05:38 PM
1	Don't let her off, YOUNG KING I think all black people should start charging royalties to these types everytime they drag the name "Emitt Till" out of the closet. I've heard him mentioned solemnly by the liberal media more times in the last week than I have in 36 years of life.	/r/MensRights	24/10/18 03:17 PM
3	An open letter to the INCEL and Men’s Rights Activists Movements And notice how neither of them are actually responsible for their choices. It's the essence of a cult. "You are bad and broken, but it's ok. It's not you, you've just been programmed wrong. Follow us and we'll teach you the right way to think. Then you'll be a truly good and happy person." Trust us.	/r/MensRights	28/08/18 05:32 AM
3	"Men's willingness to protect and help women has always been greater than their desire to oppress and dominate" But none of those women were feminists.	/r/MensRights	28/08/18 03:47 AM
1	Telling a feminist the truth. Most of your points are easily countered, but I have better things to do Of course.	/r/MensRights	23/08/18 02:11 PM
1	Telling a feminist the truth. It’s a dangerous game you are playing tho. It's not my game. They're the ones who make the argument. I'm just the one pointing out the logical conclusions of it. It's a motte and bailey. When feminism is criticized they hide behind the claim that feminism is ephemeral. Then when they need to make real world assertions all of a sudden feminism has meanings and views and standard. One can't have it both ways. Because if feminists are not held responsible for some very charged issues, it’s just goi…	/r/MensRights	23/08/18 02:11 PM
1	Telling a feminist the truth. the idea that sex is always good for a dude, even when it's actually rape of a boy, is a result of patriarchy. Really? Because that's been a feminist argument for quite some time. Mary Koss used that one as one of her reasons for why she redefined rape so that it didn't apply to men. Which has influenced large swatches of rape research. In fact it is exactly the patriarchy that most feminists use to argue for why men cannot be raped. Because men have power in a patriarchial society, so women can…	/r/MensRights	23/08/18 05:48 AM
1	Telling a feminist the truth. Nobody gets to decide what it is. That's the point. Then it is nothing. That's the point. My biggest criticism of people coming from a "I don't like feminism" angle is simply that "feminism" has a massive array of meanings. Which makes it meaningless. This is what is referred to as a motte and bailey doctrine. You want to portray feminism as being both an objective thing and a subjective thing at the same time. You can't do that, at least not honestly. If everyone has their own definition of a w…	/r/MensRights	23/08/18 12:46 AM
1	Telling a feminist the truth. It isn't your ideology. It's feminism. That's a word that actually has a meaning and a real world set of implications. If you're just calling whatever you believe in "feminism" then you're shifting definitions for no reason. Aside from an obvious attempt at dishonesty. Your entire position on what feminism is and is not is irrelevant to the discussion then, because your feminism has nothing to do with feminism in the real world as it is really practiced.	/r/MensRights	22/08/18 11:13 PM
1	Telling a feminist the truth. So sure, disagree with those people, but at least aknowledge that they aren't some massive purveyor of all that is feminism. Only according to you. They would disagree. And if they are not then who is? Who gets to decide what feminism is and what it stands for? Because if nobody does then feminism essentially is just something you're all making up and is useless. It is whatever the person who wants to use it decides that it is. Now feminism, the one that has a real world effect, is very clearly …	/r/MensRights	22/08/18 10:29 PM
3	Telling a feminist the truth. You said, that because feminism doesn't specify a belief set about men it is implicitly worthless It is, because it has no specified belief and everyone decides it individually. Which is what it should NOT be doing if it is to have any objective value. You're the one who latched onto the man thing specifically. Don't blame me for your own failures. which I believe to be synonymous to if it's not about men it is worthless. What you believe is rather irrelevant to the conversation. I don't know ho…	/r/MensRights	22/08/18 06:34 PM
10	Telling a feminist the truth. There are MRAs that make comments like, women only care about money and their upvotes are in the hundreds. So that's your equivalent of #KILLALLMEN? Sounds like they still comparatively have the high ground. Like, I can dig around for this kind of thing, but I'm sure if you've spent any amount of time here you've seen it. Shouldn't have to dig, given your claim. I don't have to dig to find feminists who want to kill men, after all.	/r/MensRights	22/08/18 05:12 PM
7	Telling a feminist the truth. At no point did I say that or imply that. That is simply a strawman born out of dishonesty on your part, or not having the ability to understand the logic of what you yourself are saying. Or admittedly both at the same time. If feminism is determined by the individual then it and it's claims have no descriptive ability in regards to reality. It is entirely subjective. Which makes it effectively useless except as a rhetorical tool. In simple terms, you are admitting that it's all just made up. Th…	/r/MensRights	22/08/18 04:51 PM
12	Telling a feminist the truth. That's the thing about feminism, it doesn't really specify a belief set about men at all, that's up to the individual. Then you implicitly admit that feminism is worthless.	/r/MensRights	22/08/18 03:26 PM
2	Telling a feminist the truth. But not every group has the same type of extremists. There's a huge difference between a muslim extremist and an amish one. Extremists reflect the ideology they originate from. Extremist feminists hate men because that's at the core of all feminist thought and ideology. To equate everyone in the group to their shittiest members isn't really representative. Perhaps not representative, but in an ideology they do bare the responsibility for it because they support the same ideology. https://www.you…	/r/MensRights	22/08/18 03:24 PM
6	A good example of Feminist (percieved) moral supremacy and it's logical conclusions. After all, if you believe men’s natural instinct is to harass or rape, what you are really arguing is that harassment and rape are normal. Yeah, I believe you call that rape culture there, sweetheart.	/r/MensRights	11/08/18 11:12 PM
1	Can we term the feminist tendency to label people as feminists against their will "Impressment?" It fits the definition pretty well. I simply refer to it as "ideological rape".	/r/MensRights	10/08/18 07:09 PM
2	Can MRM ever have the impact it desires if it accepts the claim of historical oppression of women ? No it isn't. That's why you had to cherry pick one sentence instead of addressing the part I pointed out about justice and the rest. If I have a Mercedes and the government prohibits you from buying a Mercedes because you're a 25 year old black male with no need for a Mercedes, that's oppression. Yes it is, because there is no justifiable reason for the exclusion. There was justifiable reason for why women did not vote. I specifically brought up two of them. Oppression is cruel or unjust treatme…	/r/MensRights	03/08/18 07:41 PM
3	Can MRM ever have the impact it desires if it accepts the claim of historical oppression of women ? Being legally prohibited from voting, for example, is actual oppression That's still not oppression. Unless you can point to how it is either cruel or unjust for women to not have the right to vote. Women did not vote because a) most of them had rejected it and b) they did not have any of the requisite responsibilities that earned that particular right. That one group has something that another does not is not oppression. No matter how much some people want to make it so. You're right though, pe…	/r/MensRights	03/08/18 07:11 PM
8	Woman sick of men copping the blame, organises Men’s March Also she's reasonably attractive. They'll hate that even more.	/r/MensRights	03/08/18 05:40 PM
1	1st wave feminism And you are why it is doomed to lose.	/r/MensRights	03/08/18 12:29 AM
1	1st wave feminism As for rights that women lack today, there is a power gap, a political representation gap, a wage gap (not the way the radfems are showing it, i know everyone gets paid equally for equal work, but women make less than men overall today because they are less likely to get promoted or to be encouraged to pursue ambitious fields). These are not rights. These are only statistical variances. As I said, there is no such thing as everyone being equal in all matters. Because we make choices and have pre…	/r/MensRights	03/08/18 12:26 AM
1	1st wave feminism There was a lack of equality in the past and there continues to be some today. That's because reality is not equal. People are different. People have different biological influences, we naturally form preferences, habits, we follow trends, have different life experiences etc. To say that there is a lack of equality is a meaningless statement. That's all there can ever be. The alternative is for everyone to be cookie cutter, carbon copy robots. The actual question to be pondered is whether the va…	/r/MensRights	03/08/18 12:19 AM
1	#bringbackourgirls. Just discovered that more than 25 boys were burnt alive in the same attack while women were spared death. I am Shocked and broken. Yeah, I wrote about this back when it happened. There were a lot of things the media conveniently left out about.	/r/MensRights	02/08/18 11:48 PM
12	Feminists don't care about equal rights (rant) But you’re right in that the definition of feminism is slowly changing into “women superiority”. It did not change. Feminism has always been about womens superiority. That's why it's always been explicitly named after women and everything bad has always been explicitly named after men.	/r/MensRights	22/07/18 06:57 PM
7	Bonobos expands the meaning of 'masculine' in first national TV spot It's like you think being feminine is a bad thing. That was never said or implied. All that was said was that making masculinity feminine was a bad thing. That is in no way an implication that femininity is bad. It merely says that trying to turn one thing into something that it isn't is not a good idea. Especially when it's power hungry tyrants looking to do it.	/r/MensRights	20/07/18 06:46 PM
2	Question: do Islamic women have more rights in their societies than western men? their voice is worth half of a man's according to the Quran That's actually not true. The Quran doesn't say anything like that, some Muslims just interpret it that way via cherry picking one fragment of the whole verse (it's actually the longest verse in the whole book). The verse you're referring to is talking about contract law and states that you need two witnesses (men) to the agreement. Or, you can have a man and two women as witnesses. Only one woman is actually the witness however, the se…	/r/MensRights	15/07/18 10:49 PM
1	Why are there so few straight male sex workers? (More Q's inside) Why do you think female consumers are less common? For the same reason that women are the ones who read trashy Harlequin romance novels and not men. Or write most erotic fanfiction, or the entire yaoi genre which is almost entirely the product women and not gay men as you would think that it is. Men and women fantasize sexually in different ways and about different things in general. Take Twilight as a perfect example. The reason Twilight was so popular is because it is exactly porn. Just porn m…	/r/MensRights	15/07/18 08:21 PM
1	Why are there so few straight male sex workers? (More Q's inside) Women are sharing with me that they can't find it for free, though. They can, just not necessarily with a man that meets their standards. Most women judge men much more harshly than men judge women because women need to be more choosy from a biological perspective. A man can just run around and impregnate multiple women a day as long as his stamina holds-out and no loss. But a woman who gets pregnant is looking at a nine month commitment minimum barring surgery to abort. So they are naturally mo…	/r/MensRights	15/07/18 07:38 PM
4	As much as I have serious concerns about #metoo being taken too far, I think it’s worth acknowledging that brazen sexual harassment of women by men does happen. This clip is an example of it. I don’t buy that he was doing it absentmindedly. Who cares what you buy? I mean that. See here is your problem and the problem with #metoo You can't take a subjective thing and go off making wild objective claims. You are claiming that this is objectively sexual harassment with no knowledge of the situation beyond a video clip or insight into the minds or intentions of the people involved. For that matter not even a consistent definition of sexual harassment. You're just looking at something tha…	/r/MensRights	08/07/18 10:40 PM
-2	As much as I have serious concerns about #metoo being taken too far, I think it’s worth acknowledging that brazen sexual harassment of women by men does happen. This clip is an example of it. The point is that we can forget about how prevalent it is sometimes Showing one isolated incidence says nothing about prevalence. If you wanted to show that you would have shown actual statistical data. As it is you are just pointing to a single incident which you claim to be sexual harassment and screaming "SEE, LOOK! A WOMAN IS GETTING HARASSED! IT HAPPENS SOMETIMES!SEE!SEE!" However, as has been mentioned this has never been a point of contention. Everyone knows that it happens, no one forgot…	/r/MensRights	08/07/18 06:58 PM
14	As much as I have serious concerns about #metoo being taken too far, I think it’s worth acknowledging that brazen sexual harassment of women by men does happen. This clip is an example of it. Dude, there’s already been one person in this thread defending the guy above. That's not the same as denying women are ever harassed. In fact it's not even close. Your continued use of this instance is making you appear very dishonest. Yes, there are people who can’t recognize sexual harassment when they see it, and some of them are here. Because it's a vague term that can have many different applications. That's why it's so easily abused. Somebody disagreeing with you on a specific instance doe…	/r/MensRights	08/07/18 05:10 PM
1	Things feminism gets right. I'm male you idiot. He portrayed you as a male. He said that the laws allowed for discrimination against men. Then said that when you get discriminated by this law you will maybe see. ie. He is referring to you as a man. You might want to reconsider so constantly insulting the intelligence of others.....just saying. Glass houses, stones, and all of that.	/r/MensRights	04/07/18 06:10 PM
2	Things feminism gets right. So no actual argument then? Just for some reason you felt the need to link me to you making a childish, hypocritical rant about how angry and disappointed you are that nobody took what you asserted for granted. People pointed out that you were wrong, asking for evidence for your claims, to which you responded petulantly. And you chose to display this to me, why? To prove to me that I was right about you? That wasn't really necessary, I was already very sure of the sort of person you were.	/r/MensRights	03/07/18 04:00 PM
4	Things feminism gets right. First of all, if you can't debate without resorting to insults, you need to grow the fuck up It's not an insult. It's an accurate description of the man. The fact that an accurate description of him is insulting is not my fault. And you haven't debated anything. So don't whine to me like a petulant child about growing up. I don't know what video's you've been watching, but he has railed against hard core feminists in many of his debates and lectures, especially when it comes to the viewing women…	/r/MensRights	02/07/18 05:55 PM
5	Things feminism gets right. I noticed this was unsourced, so I looked it up. Found it on a feminist website which also, for some strange reason, did not source it. But it did provide me enough information to find the actual court decision and what the Supreme Court actually said. Not that little blurb you quoted, which wasn't even a full qupt. They didn't even finish the whole sentence. The court case was not about whether a husband could beat their wife. The ruling was about a woman who had been abused looking to sue her …	/r/MensRights	02/07/18 04:19 PM
4	Things feminism gets right. If I remember correctly Jordan Peterson brings it up in the channel 4 debate he did with her. Peterson is a snake oil salesman and lies or misrepresents facts fairly often in order to suit his own narrative that he wants to push. So the fact that he said something isn't very convincing. He doesn't even really recognize objective truth unless it supports his worldview. More importantly, that was no argument or even a coherent point. I just gave you two facts which are anathema to your narrative a…	/r/MensRights	02/07/18 03:53 PM
5	Things feminism gets right. Yes, and it is often a 4 year degree to become one. And? That in no way is an argument that the profession is undervalued. At best it's an argument that you personally think they should make more. Which is irrelevant. Show an actual statistical comparison between jobs if you want to be taken seriously. My dad (who was a head caretaker) made $37 an hour, and I can tell you that was a lot lower stress and required less education. An electrician requires a 4 year and makes about $30 as well. Did yo…	/r/MensRights	02/07/18 03:17 PM
6	The Pink Tax (a dash of humor and sanity) To quote another redditor: A commonly held but false belief. To collect this elusive substance you must grab the single tear he sheds for Bruce Lee during his annual viewing of The Way of the Dragon. This is the manliest tear.	/r/MensRights	28/06/18 07:16 PM
1	I’m working on a project to increase understanding between sides and I would like you help. Even moreso. At least in traditionalism men get respected and rewarded for what they do. Feminism makes a man do all of the usual work and self-sacrifice and then focuses societies scorn on you.	/r/MensRights	08/04/18 08:18 PM
9	Feminist explains why porn ban is necessary: "A recent German study found a clear negative correlation between consumption of Internet pornography and marriage rates among young men!!!" And the notion that masturbating to porn could be the physical equivalent of a sexual relationship is unutterably sad Not when you consider all of the other baggage that necessarily comes with that relationship,or just getting to that relationship. It's not sad, it's eminently reasonable. Trying to have sex with a woman is a horribly, terrible and inefficient use of ones time and resources.Unless she's a prostitute at which point it's just a straight business transaction. There's a reason it's t…	/r/MensRights	02/02/15 04:38 AM
7	Feminist explains why porn ban is necessary: "A recent German study found a clear negative correlation between consumption of Internet pornography and marriage rates among young men!!!" Are men becoming increasingly disinterested in real women? To be honest.I've never actually understood the appeal of women for the purposes of marriage or sex. I'm straight, and I have many female friends, but I would never date any of them or want to have sex with them. It just never seemed to be worth it.I've simply never understood this preoccupation other men have with marrying or having sex with real women. It's a lot of effort and hassle for a few minutes of pleasure. As opposed to the eas…	/r/MensRights	01/02/15 11:09 PM
1	Reasonable feminists call out "misguided" #EndFathersDay movement Replace Feminism with the MRM and this paragraph is just as applicable never said otherwise, though MRM is a movement not an ideology so your position is not really applicable. ideologies need not have every concept unilaterally agreed on. again, otherwise was never said. the point that was made was that because of this saying "these people do not represent the group" is a useless statement. I wasn't around when #killallmen trended - from research it was satire, right? no. You understand its abo…	/r/MensRights	14/06/14 04:21 PM
2	#EndFathersDay was started as a troll by /pol/. Let's not get up in a tizzy about it, okay? I think you might want to read some of the news articles or maybe just read the entire comment section of this post, it's clear you've done neither. 1 ad hominem I erroneously assumed you would be minimally informed about the subject you were attempting to discuss. 2 ad hominems Apparently you are here to discuss a subject you are not informed on in the slightest, since I am not interested in that I am going to end this discussion. 3 ad hominems, cue the thunder and the laughter of the count you…	/r/MensRights	14/06/14 02:15 AM
5	#EndFathersDay was started as a troll by /pol/. Let's not get up in a tizzy about it, okay? I'm using fact correctly. no, you aren't because if you had there would be some facts appearing in your claims. It was found out very quickly because the majority of people were instantly skeptical of it and did not participate in it. Making the hashtag easily tracked to the faked accounts, the planted "news story" and ultimately the 4chan post. This happened within hours so very quickly this means that enough people were skeptical enough to 1) not only not participate and realize it was a hoax …	/r/MensRights	14/06/14 01:51 AM
10	#EndFathersDay was started as a troll by /pol/. Let's not get up in a tizzy about it, okay? You are saying people couldn't tell if they were trolls or not, the fact of the matter is it seems that the majority of the people could and did tell the difference no, and you're using the word "fact" wrong, because you haven't demonstrated any. how exactly are you judging the "majority"? It wasn't easily believable. it was easily believable though, that's why it was believed so easily. it's that the evidence wasn't there when people went to look for it. you're being more than a little disingen…	/r/MensRights	14/06/14 01:17 AM
11	#EndFathersDay was started as a troll by /pol/. Let's not get up in a tizzy about it, okay? The majority of people started investigating because it was so absurd It isn't absurd though. By feminist standards it's actually pretty tame (see the previously mentioned #killallmen as an example or Schrodingers Rapist). That's why the idea was so easy to believe and so quickly absorbed. It's standard fare, it was just that this one time it happened to be fake. I know what I was seeing in my feed. So do I and I was seeing a lot of support on my twitter feed for it. They may or may not have bee…	/r/MensRights	13/06/14 11:53 PM
13	#EndFathersDay was started as a troll by /pol/. Let's not get up in a tizzy about it, okay? A lot of people figured out this troll pretty quickly. Only once 4chan was mentioned. Prior to that it was just the usual feminists crying NAFALT. Most others were asking if it was a troll in the same way they asked the same about banbossy and #killallmen. They didn't want to think anyone could be that stupid. Not because they didn't think it wasn't a feminist idea.	/r/MensRights	13/06/14 10:33 PM
42	#EndFathersDay was started as a troll by /pol/. Let's not get up in a tizzy about it, okay? The lesson is that no one could tell the difference.	/r/MensRights	13/06/14 09:03 PM
10	Reasonable feminists call out "misguided" #EndFathersDay movement extremists and do NOT speak for feminists as a whole. no one does, because feminism is a vague ideology. it means whatever the person using it wants it to mean. anything any feminist says does not not speak for feminism as a whole. that doesn't mean that it is not representative of feminism as a group though, which this certainly is. also calling them "extremists" doesn't matter. what matters is how pervasive their mentality is in the group and how much control they exert over the groups directi…	/r/MensRights	13/06/14 07:37 PM
16	Reasonable feminists call out "misguided" #EndFathersDay movement i think the fact that so many were unable to tell whether it was serious or not is the main lesson that should have been taken away from this	/r/MensRights	13/06/14 06:40 PM