TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CerealExprmntz Archive

View 0 posts and 233 comments by CerealExprmntz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Not at all. This already happens. Y'all just think it's some sort of slight that only y'all experience. It isn't. Men just don't complain about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 07:56 AM
-1

OMG! The HORROR! The TERROR! The TERRIFYING HORROR!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 04:39 PM
1

What are his values? What does he want in life? All you've listed are career and educational attributes. You haven't described a person, you've described a series of functions and advantages.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:41 PM
12

They had to persuade a man to marry her Then why is the "traditional" norm for men to approach and court the woman? If that's how our grandparents and their parents were doing things, at what point were women supposedly doing this persuading of men? How did that look? What were women doing to persuade men to marry them?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:29 PM
3

Misogyny? It's pure misandry. Good Lord, people who think like this are the worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 01:02 PM
1

Basically women can't do anything without being judged Right, because everything men do is exalted by women. having a collection of romance novels, You mean smut? Pornographic literature? I get the sense that some guys similarly find this sort of media consumption judgement worthy Similar to how women feel about sports fandoms, Warhammer, video games etc never said women are doing this for you. What reason would men have to think that women were doing these things for us? How would women do thes…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 12:51 PM
–

How do you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 08:58 AM
–

Hell no.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 08:58 AM
2

It's not that hard. This is the part that bugs me. Most of the women who have the audacity to use this sentence have absolutely no fucking idea what they're talking about because they have never done this, and by complaining about men not approaching them they are outright proving that they would never do this. So how on Earth would they know how hard it is? It's actually very insulting to make this assertion. And it shows the complete lack of empathy involved in this complaint. They just want t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 08:44 AM
7

No it won't. Women will keep choosing to have sex and keep finding their own way to deal with pregnancy regardless of the availability of clinical abortions.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 08:18 AM
10

I see extremely little empathy from red pill men to the challenges women face. You actually aren't saying it to everyone. You only took the time to specifically call out men, while paying lip service to the idea that everyone needs to empathize with each other. But you make no specific effort to call women out on their luck of empathy for men. You imply at multiple points that women already empathize with men, which is more often not the case. But because you implied this, you can make the claim…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 08:14 AM
–

Asexual men exist. Men with low sex drives exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 08:04 AM
8

Please outline the chain of thought that led you to that conclusion?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 08:03 AM
6

We need two way empathy - FROM MEN! Lol, amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 08:02 AM
1

Seriously, why don't women just approach men? Y'all wanted to be equal, that would be equal. It doesn't have to be your exclusive responsibility, but it doesn't have to be ours either.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 02:25 PM
1

Men go through exactly what you've described as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 02:16 PM
–

You ever think that these men just want to be treated like human beings?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 05:02 PM
1

So why is it a bad thing when women do it ? Because in either scenario the man is typically the one who has to take initiative of any kind. But, essentially, if you're not the hot guy, you're going to have to take a lot more initiative to get to the same point that Randy Rando just walks up to. This has real, tangible costs for men as well as the emotional toll of dealing with the fact that the woman doesn't actually like you, but it willing to saddle you with the privilege of having to prove th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 10:42 AM
2

In this clip, a woman is talking about how bars and clubs are starting to charge women an entry fee where we it used to be free. Good. Get equalized. It got me to thinking... $30 for parking My God. $25 to get in Damn $20 for 1 cocktail Oof No table, no section, no bottle service? Yeah, that must cost a lot more! girl's night out with your friends is through the roof now! Oh no! Clubs are taking advantage of women going out in groups and it's not right. Lmao, why not? That's their business. They…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 04:03 PM
1

I don't know if I have the energy to argue against an obvious absurdity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 03:54 PM
1

Whether this post is misandric or not is rendered irrelevant by how silly and outdated the premise actually is. Let me sum your entire post up in a word: bootstraps.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 03:45 PM
1

No. Even if a man wanted this, how realistic is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 03:40 PM
8

She sings about how men here expect women to split the bill, but her beauty routine should recuse her from having to so Why should someone's personal grooming routine ever exempt them from splitting the bill? Y'all do that for yourselves. But they also say they don't like modern Western women (the very type to be okay with splitting the bill). The women who are expecting men to fulfill all of the traditional male courtship roles and women who are willing to split the bill are not the same women …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 10:30 AM
–

Lol wow, you tried it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 10:25 AM
2

Wade Wilson
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 08:43 AM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 02:36 PM
1

I disagree. It's our jobs to protect each other. But I get where you're coming from.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 02:34 PM
–

Okay. Well, you could just date women and keep on keeping on.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 02:28 PM
–

Only my ex. She was cool in many ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 02:14 PM
1

She says "I'm pregnant". He says, "Have an abortion, I don't want to be a father". She says "No". Well, that was stupid. He splits and pays for all 18 years of child support in 1 shot. If he can afford to, great. I doubt most men in this situation would have that option. This hurts the child as now... there's no ties to the father. Sure. But that could have been prevented if the woman was responsible enough to abort the pregnancy. if his income increases she has no rights to those earnings Tough…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 09:27 PM
3

If I wanted to use you as a personal dildo, I would know that it'd be because I don't respect or love you at all and I see you as less than nothing. Well, that's a very weird outlook on life. You'd only have casual sex with someone or something that you have so much contempt for that to think of them as nothing would be too good. That's more unhealthy than just having casual sex. I'd probably want to shut you up every second, wanting to use you as an appliance and nothing more. See? That's reall…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 07:12 AM
2

I'm pretty sure men didn't even come up with the idea of settling...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 07:00 AM
1

Usually, yes. Because most often people don't listen and don't try to understand the other person's situation from their perspective before giving advice. It's like the act of telling someone what they should do is an ego boost or something. Usually when women tell men that their they need to lower their standards, I think both sexes don't like being told to lower their standards for different reasons. For men it's usually because the standards either haven't been expressed at all, so being told…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 06:59 AM
3

but men assume they are stuck up and mean just because they love glam and wearing a lot of makeup . How do you know this? I know some of my friends already getting written off by men just because they love glam makeup nails and such How do you know? Men assume they are narcissistic and mean spirited This, how do you know? It seems like you are the one making assumptions...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 06:53 AM
2

Ironically, when this term became popular I knew a guy named Chad who actually fit the description completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 09:58 AM
2

Why is it that people will moralize endlessly about older men dating younger women, but never have shit to say about the younger women who specifically go for older men?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 09:53 AM
14

That's not what blue balls is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 09:44 AM
1

Okay, so what?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 08:08 AM
2

Lol not a chance in hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 08:06 AM
2

None. And I disagree with your reasoning too.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 08:06 AM
–

Stuff like how most guys are most attracted to 20yr olds Not a secret most men wouldn't mind fucking another women while in a relationship if their partner doesn't find out. More of a stereotype. Not exactly something that can be proven or falsified.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 08:00 AM
7

women can only extract from you what you allow them to. The same could be said for men who women use for sex, barring a fucking crime. It's amazing how manipulation ceases to be an issue as soon as it's a man being manipulated and strung along. Women have no agency, even when they're doing wrong. but like obviously the loss/consequences isn't as severe as ending up with a pregnancy from a man who secretly hates you or an STD Then use contraception if you absolutely must have sex. You have option…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 04:28 PM
4

getting strung along for material stuff is a choice Sex is material. I take my material, and put it into her material and we rub our materials together. don't give too much of yourself to people who don't reciprocate Right back at you. Close your legs. the consequences of getting strung along sexually are potentially a pregnancy Y'all have so many different ways to prevent that, including abstinence. with a man who secretly hates you Okay, that sounds weirdly personal. Why do you assume the pers…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 04:21 PM
–

I don't care. Send her rapist ass to jail.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 04:06 PM
3

no women don't typically keep men around as placeholder sex objects when they aren't actually attracted to them No, they don't. But they do use them in other damaging ways. These types of women will happily string them along for whatever other material benefits that man can get them until they no longer have a use for them. You seem to think that women just don't treat men like shit for selfish reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 04:05 PM
10

because women will simply usually just reject a man she isn't into. Some women will, and some women will continue to string a man along to extract what she can out of him. I know to a man a woman using him and wasting his time sounds just fine No it fucking doesn't, where did you get that idea? That doesn't even make sense, especially under the culture where men are expected to put in all of the upfront effort to make relationships happen. Why would anyone just be okay with someone wasting their…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 03:59 PM
9

men need to approach because they aren't as picky as women. That doesn't make any sense. That's a very good reason that women SHOULD approach. women run a huge risk of being used as a placeholder chick when they approach men because men will fuck women they even hate if she throws herself into his lap. I'm sorry, do women not also do this to men who approach them? Do women not also use men when it suits them?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 03:53 PM
5

Men are attracted to most women, so women should be attracted to most men I've never heard anyone say this. Men are expected to approach, court, initiate, so women should be expected to approach, court, and initiate.” Okay, why are men expected to do this? Should the fact that men are expected to do this be enough of a reason for men to simply accept this as the norm? What is wrong with expecting women to approach if they are interested? Women claim to be men's equals in all things, so why not t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 03:51 PM
1

How is that possible? Those are mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 01:18 PM
1

Oh really? Do you also think that gay men and women could essentially be persuaded to be straight? I mean, you're trying to persuade straight men to go gay, so it's logically consistent that you would think the opposite is true as well? Because you clearly think that a lack of desire and a sexual orientation is the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 06:53 AM
1

And I explained why those are bad arguments. The reason they are bad arguments may not have been your intention, but that doesn't make your arguments any better. Men could have gay sex if they desired it, except they don’t desire it so they don’t have it. No, they couldn't. They would have to be gay to have that desire. That's the flaw in your argument that I was pointing out. The difference that you're ignoring is that straight women who don't want to date certain men because they aren't attrac…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 01:35 PM
0

I did. Your post is shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:47 PM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:37 PM
0

The entire point is that men have no desire to sleep with other men, gain no advantage because of it. They are not even a part of the gender that those man could enter into any sort of sexual or romantic relationship with at all. Men are a gender that straight and bisexual women can enter into sexual and romantic relationships with. It's completely different. Women absolutely gain an advantage from this because, even if they aren't attracted to those men, the fact that those men are attracted to…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:35 PM
1

You don't seem to understand what the issue is. The problem that most men have with this app is the fact that the women are just throwing up these guy's personally identifiable information like full names, phone numbers, addresses, place of work etc. That is called doxxing. People have hated doxxing on the internet for a good long time. I'm pretty sure it's illegal in some places. If it isn't, it should be. This is for everyone's safety.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:27 PM
0

Most men could have sex with a heap of men on grinder No, they couldn't. Sexuality isn't a choice. By making this suggestion, you are validating things like conversation therapy and invalidating one of the main bases of gay rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:24 PM
4

I think the bigger issue is the homophobia in suggesting that sexuality is a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:19 PM
1

Another post whining about men generalizing about women, but making no mention of women generalizing about men despite the latter being no less common.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 05:19 PM
1

Both statements are incorrect. Sometimes people just act selfishly or maliciously.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 01:00 PM
2

it is important to acknowledge that men are already capable of forming these circles almost at any online social space That doesn't mean that it was being done. No, men were not doxxing and gossiping en masse about women they fucked. This is absolutely something that women have been doing for years, though. Go to any online social space and you can find male circles where they do and discuss those kinds of things. You can find men talking about women in general. You would be hard pressed to find…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 01:02 PM
2

Yes. But we're also expected to be the protector so it's not exactly something we can express in the same way without it being deemed pathetic and unmanly. If you want protection as a man, learn to protect yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 05:21 PM
1

There are literally billions of us. Your point is moot.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 06:27 AM
7

This is often not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 06:22 AM
5

Stop dating men then.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 06:19 AM
2

Throughout human history: Roughly 33% of men reproduced. While about 80% of women did. This argument should end there. Why? Nope. It was the invention of agriculture. Which allowed a few, select men, to gather large swaths of wealth and power. Sound familiar? Yeah, but we live in a different time and you aren't accounting for the differences at all. It's not women "causing" this issue man. Just like it wasn't when farming was invented. A women is going to choose the best option for her future ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 06:16 AM
8

I would say it goes even further than that: many of the same women who expect men to deconstruct male gender norms still hold men to many of those same gender norms, especially when those norms serve them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 06:01 AM
5

Women don't move on faster after a relationship ends And the real reason is that women just have so many options when it comes to dating that it's incredibly easy for them to move on to the next guy. Immediately contradicting yourself here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 05:58 AM
–

Another example of people clutching their pearls about men generalizing about men but not giving a shit about women doing the same thing despite it happening more often and more publicly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 03:59 PM
–

And women. Don't forget that women murder too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 07:24 AM
3

I don't expect men to breastfeed Great example. Men are not capable of breastfeeding. Women are capable of approaching men they're interested in. So by your logic, it's perfectly fine for men to expect women to approach men because it is within their capabilities. Y'all are simply choosing not to, and being quite rude about it. Even if a man wanted to breastfeed, he doesn't possess the natural capability. Most women are capable of walking up to another person and speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 04:23 PM
2

Up to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 01:12 PM
6

An unspoken social contract? Wtf are you on about? Men don't owe women this. Y'all are equals, no? Then participate equally. Nothing is stopping y'all from approaching the men you're interested in. If this is some unspoken social contract that we all supposedly have a duty to uphold, then what exactly is the woman's part of it? We give you this, and what do we get? What do you owe to men due to this social contract?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 07:25 AM
1

Back at you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 07:21 AM
6

Right. Women are never toxic all on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 05:01 PM
–

Your premise is absurd, sexist, and dehumanizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:19 PM
1

This is such a weak attempt at being insulting
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 10:08 AM
1

Men love to dismiss women's caution towards them as "chronically online," Right. And women never do this. If a woman is jaded or resentful towards men (justifiably so) the braindead default response tends to be "get off reddit." I don't think it's justified to hold people accountable for the actions of other, unrelated people. But again, women say this same stuff to men all the time. Hell, often other men say this to men too. This isn't something unique to women at all. I actually believe the op…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 10:06 AM
6

There’s a recurring theme I’ve noticed here—especially from men—about not wanting to invest time, energy, or money into dating or socializing without a guaranteed return. Especially from men? I would argue that the only reason you have to believe this is because women's demands for guarantees start from the beginning of the dating process and are completely normalized and socially acceptable, regardless of the guarantee or the reason. Men knew they’d likely be footing the bill on dates. That was…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 10:01 AM
3

I see a lot of posts that women are harder to date, harder to please etc. It might be sort of true in the beginning stages of relationship, I understand men are expected to make the first move, initiate the date etc. which can get draining. I don't think you actually acknowledge how draining this can be, especially if you have little success. This stage alone makes women significantly harder to date in a way that you simply do not understand and stop short of acknowledging so that you can go on …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 09:57 AM
1

Women are mocked for using gut feelings and intuition for filtering men (our "mind-reading" and "psychic powers"), so let's stick strictly to observable concepts Well, yeah, because those are assumptions. Men would be mocked all the same for doing that. One way women can filter against bad men is pre-selection, which is mocked as being a conformist hivemind and only wanting the men other women want. And how are those criticisms wrong? Another way women try to filter is by using groups like "Are …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 02:56 PM
1

This already exists in my country and I have gone with women. Yes, it's fine. Look but don't touch.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 02:42 PM
1

I think you think that women are a lot more ignorant about expensive cars than they actually are
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 04:21 PM
1

Okay, and? Can men not care about cars on their own?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 03:45 PM
1

What the hell did I just read? Homie, you're just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 12:26 PM
2

When you marry someone, you are agreeing that your assets are now shared and will be split 50/50. Shared, yes. Split 50/50 makes it sound like you're already planning on a divorce. What's there to split if you stay married? Then it's just "our stuff". There would be no need to determine percentages of ownership in that context. To complain about this during a divorce is your own fault if you didn’t want to share assets in the first place. No, it isn't. The sharing part only comes into play as lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 12:15 PM
1

How would one use statistics to date?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 12:51 PM
1

You can't be that lazy, come on. "Choosing signals" are the bare minimum. They require no effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 11:54 AM
7

It doesn't hold any advantage for men. It's just a cultural expectation. If anything, it benefits women. Would you ever say that a person applying for a job holds more privilege and advantages than the person who is hiring for the job?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 04:11 PM
11

This is a perfect example of what I'm talking about. A whole bunch of flowery nonsense toxic masculinity. If men really were privileged in this area, if we really had a choice, nobody would ever say the shit you just said. But they do, constantly. End though we named this sort of thing and deemed it unhealthy as a society. When it comes to dating, all of a sudden the toxic masculinity comes right back from all sides. Privilege? Give me a break.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 01:35 PM
2

Anyways it's pretty clear she is a victim of fuckbois. She is not a victim. . What if the tables were flipped? I've been in this type of relationship. It sucks because I wanted more out of it and she just wanted me for sex. I didn't like that. She tried to get back with me and I refused. What exactly is your point? Some guys would be okay with this, and others would hate it. So? That's life. Get over it. Vet your partners better. I had to take that lesson as well. People like this usually have r…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 01:30 PM
8

So? Men are socialized to approach women or be seen as cowards, as well as being alone. Again, not a privilege if you are pressured into it in this way. Men have also been made to feel that they are doing something wrong by approaching women. But we're also made to feel like we're inadequate if we don't approach women. It isn't a privilege if you don't really have a choice. Women can just choose to ignore whatever society tells them they should or shouldn't do, just like they have so many times …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 01:26 PM
8

Yes, they absolutely can. According to Reddit, they already do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 01:16 PM
11

I think you're completely wrong. Women are the privileged ones here. They get the choice to approach or not approach and they still have a greater likelihood of having a dating life. Men don't get any choice but in who they choose to approach. Women can make the same choice, or they can choose to sit back and wait for men to approach them. Men get to choose to approach or be alone. That is not a privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 01:15 PM
1

You're taking the lives of the 1% of that time and applying it to everyone from that time. Do you not see the problem with your argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 07:31 AM
–

I don't think that is what is meant by this. Put out if you want, don't if you don't. But don't act like this strategy guarantees anything. It depends a lot on the man you're dealing with. And yes, there are patient fuckboys. Dating is a gamble.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 07:28 AM
0

Well the red pill makes generalizations about men and women and what they want. And so many women do the same thing. "Men are trash. Kill all men. The world would be better without men." Should I take the fact that some women make generalizations to mean that those women speak for all women? Of course not! So don't use that excuse. Imo they´re generally accurate about what women want but are painfully oblivious about male nature. If you say so. I don't think you're any closer to the truth on the…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 12:49 PM
2

The richest man in the world just married a 55 yo divorced woman with obvious plastic surgery. And? What does that have to do with anyone else? What, because we're also men that means that we think exactly like him? We all want the same things? The exact opposite of what Red Pillers are telling us that men want in women. If you think that Red Pillers speak for all men, I have a bridge in China to sell you. Imo, if a woman is hot and seductive enough, it doesn´t matter if she´s a single mother, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 12:40 PM
1

Since redpill guys are somewhat entitled to what other men had before, Before what? How do you know they feel entitled? If you're talking about before current day feminism then I have news for you: Waiting for sex was the norm back then. Courting was the norm back then. Casual sex was not looked at well by society back then. The sexual revolution is directly responsible for all of these changes. However,doesn't it mean that the fact redpill guys despise and avoid women who won't give sex them ea…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 09:28 AM
3

You can't determine what other people find attractive for them. The men who say this are speaking for themselves. So in the case of their own opinions, they are absolutely correct. In order for you to be attractive, other people have to find you attractive. There is no objective measure of attractiveness besides consensus. And all it takes for you to be unattractive to someone is for them to disagree with the idea that you are attractive. Simple as. It isn't a matter of right and wrong. It's a m…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 09:14 AM
2

No. That's a big win.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 07:57 PM
13

No. We don't keep a registry. They're out there somewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 09:41 PM
–

For example men want to date women more beautiful than them almost 100% of the time. That's simply not true. Men want to date women that they personally find attractive. What that actually means differs from person to person. Besides this, women are widely considered to be better looking than men anyways. Beauty is social currency, For who? What social benefit does a man actually get for dating a woman he finds attractive? Do women not want the same thing? Doesn't that mean that they would benef…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:06 AM
5

I'd argue that it implies that there are men who want to be cucked, and men who want to cuck other men. It doesn't indicate which is the larger group.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 08:39 AM
1

more indiscriminately hypersexual. Interesting. In this hypothetical, have men changed at all? If not, then maybe this all-round indiscriminate hypersexuality results in relationships being a foreign concept altogether. Free love, like the 70s.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:24 PM
1

Doesn't that disprove this entire post?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:18 PM
0

They get hung up when it comes to relationships. If we're just talking about horny people being horny, I doubt it would come up all that often.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:18 PM
3

You're welcome to test this hypothesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:16 PM
1

I thought women were out earning men like crazy
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:09 PM
1

Neither is therapy
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:05 PM
2

We were discussing a completely different term
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 05:35 PM
1

Nah, come on! Ring around the rosey! Again, again!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:39 PM
4

You're welcome to change it. I don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:29 PM
-3

Okay. It's still a shitty term. Now it's your turn to say that the name doesn't negate the concept and we can keep going around like this for the next few hours.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:28 PM
3

Because I've read the explanation, which revealed that the term brings up images of completely different things. Which is why I think it's a shitty term that needs to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:25 PM
–

Christ almighty, it's always men's fault somehow that y'all do stupid shit that gets you results you don't want. Y'all always come up with the worst interpretations, stereotypes, projections, and outright lies about men and then you use that as justifications for whatever bullshit you feel like indulging in next.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:15 PM
–

I'm so happy that I'm not related to anyone like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:13 PM
4

Yes, and I helped them, and they're doing better now. Y'all are just selfish people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:12 PM
–

Then why use that word?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:07 PM
5

Yeah, that seems more appropriate. Or even mental load. I don't know which is better out of those, but emotional labor makes it pretty unclear what is actually being spoken about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:07 PM
-3

It doesn't really explain the concept well either. It kind of obfuscates it's actual meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:04 PM
3

Jesus Christ, of all the unhelpful things I've heard people do this is one of the worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 01:55 PM
4

It's just a shitty term. Come up with a better term.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 01:54 PM
2

Well, alright then. So long as we are being fair. However, a monthly expense vs a single expense kinda doesn't even out.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 01:36 PM
2

So it would be totally fine for a man to ask a woman for a paternity test and leave her with the bill?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 12:40 PM
1

Also kindness whilst isn't transactional you should expect basic kindness back or you're being a pushover. That's literally a transaction. You can expect decency for decency, but kindness doesn't require anything to be returned. If your being taken advantage of then you need to put a stop to that. You need to demonstrate self respect and learn to recognize opportunists. That should be easy for you. I've been taken advantage of myself. But instead of blaming the world for it, instead of blaming a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 12:25 PM
4

There's a a world of difference between "too harsh" and "completely meaningless"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 12:15 PM
1

Bitchier women always win. Whether it's keeping a man in check or whether it is getting a man to commit in the first place. Bitchier people win in all spheres of life Your opinion means just as much to me as my humanity does to you. Being nice serves literally no one as by a week they will forget your kind deed and you'll get nothing in return. That depends on a lot. But if you're doing things for people expecting a reward, you aren't being kind you're being transactional. But I wouldn't expect …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 11:35 AM
4

Do I see men as human beings? Fuck no Finally, I get one of you sexists to admit to it. do you see women as human beings though, considering I was deserted after giving my kidney away for a bitchier woman, also no. I. Do. Not. Know. You. Whoever left you, whatever happened there has absolutely fuckall to do with me. The manosphere doesn't speak for all men or even most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 10:12 AM
8

You know significantly less about men than you think and it's clear that you barely see men as human beings. Goodbye.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:32 AM
2

So what?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:26 AM
10

To them, this doesn't even happen. Isn't possible. We're all slobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:25 AM
14

You're doing a lot of assuming here. It's always the least generous interpretation to bolster the argument that men deserve to be treated like shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:23 AM
12

Expecting for him to pay for the first date or something and NOTHING MORE than that, I would say would be like a minimum gender role expectation. That is perfectly okay and normal to expect, even if verbally against gender roles. No, it isn't. That is hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:23 AM
37

Well yes and no. They only support the gender roles that benefit them and are convenient for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:22 AM
2

Like literally everything, it depends on the person. Like do they see it as a benefit if a woman is a celebrity/high-status? Maybe, but probably not. For example, if a woman was equally attractive, would they care if she was a famous singer or worked at McDonald's? Usually no. Because we know what women expect of us, regardless of what tax bracket they are in. Also, if you're a man, would you want to be a groupie if you could? No. I'm guessing that the only thing stopping men from being groupies…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:20 AM
3

You don't think women who do what you're suggesting would just think that they are being smart regardless of how it affects the man they're with? You're literally recommending apathy, obnoxiousness, and manipulation of a romantic partner. That is being a bitch. That is not how you treat another human being who you expect to stay in a long term relationship with. And you expect this person to marry you. You're recommending abusive behavior for personal gain. That's why you want to make it seem li…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:18 AM
4

How would you know this?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:13 AM
18

BEING STRATEGICALLY BITCHY IS NOT THE SAME AS BEING A BITCH. Yes, it is. You are not fit for a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:12 AM
2

Yes, I agree. That's a lot more expensive and extensive, seeing as you cannot have a baby every month. So, seeing as you would be requiring this so often, are you footing the bill?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:57 AM
–

I didn't know any of that, that's incredibly fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:53 AM
1

It doesn't matter which comes first. People form their standards at different times in their lives and not expressing them doesn't mean they don't have them. It does matter and that's not what I meant at all. Women's standards are expressed first. As if they're simply the rules of the game. Many of men's standards have been actively labelled sexism, often for absurd reasons, which teaches men to keep their standards to themselves until they know they can actually speak to the woman they're with.…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:52 AM
2

Yeah, but it's very different. I explained how it's different.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 11:08 PM
–

Um…..what other country has a forest known for people being that their resting place? That's irrelevant, what does this have to do with competitiveness? Its typically loneliness and work related failures. I didn't ask you about typical reasons, I asked you about the individual in the video. Do you know what that individual human being's reasons were?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 10:55 PM
–

Places like Korea, China, and Japan dont have a good reputation of handling competitiveness well either…..especially alluding to a famous forest that Logan Paul found himself in. What does Logan Paul recording the body of a recent suicide have to do with competitiveness? Do you know what that individual's reasons were for hanging themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 10:06 PM
1

Jesus, I'm just tired and trying to understand what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 10:01 PM
2

I think there are multiple reasons, but one that is not often mentioned is that men are judged by their ability to get a mate in a way that women aren't really. Sometimes they are, but it's a lot less common for people to use your ability to successfully get with a partner as proof of your gender identity(the "if you can't get a woman, you aren't a real man" mentality). You can even see this in the common insults used on men. Most of them are related to his ability to get with a woman. Coupled w…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 09:59 PM
1

I feel like we're having two different conversations. Men “fulfilled” these roles but not at their female partners discretion. I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Could you put it another way, please?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 09:51 PM
1

Who said I would wait for her to be pregnant? I agree, it should be brought up earlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 09:47 PM
2

Y'all act like men are some great big leaders entitled to relationships I see people saying this all over the place, what are these guys saying that tells you that they believe they are entitled to a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 09:42 PM
16

The women who expect men to protect and provide and lead expect it because the men they deal with expect women to be meek homemakers who follow. That just isn't true. The expectation to provide and protect comes first and the ability to do so, particularly the ability to provide, must be demonstrated first. Before the man's expectations are even expressed. And the acceptability of the expectations are completely different. You can even see this in the way it's discussed. Men (some) are rejected …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 09:39 PM
1

Please tell me what other way there is to take it?? Maybe don't make it about you and your feelings. It's about the father's certainty. Whether you agree with that, or you think that's stupid or whatever is completely irrelevant. You will never father a child. If you have a child, it will be pretty hard for you not to know that it's yours. If it makes women feel so accused then y'all should be supportive of this being mandatory. And again, I'm certain that every single person who has been cheate…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 09:24 PM
2

However, I would say things like this are likely written from the “it’s not the 50s anymore” lens. Lol, why? He's talking to men, and pretty much everything he said is what men from that time would say to men too. Not all that long ago women needed marriage to have a “normal” or fulfilling life. Money, shelter, a family, etc. because we didn’t have the same legal rights as well as societal rights. Okay, but that was then and this is now, and men still have to fulfill the same roles?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 09:16 PM
17

I am not shaming. Oh come on, don't do that. Have the courage to admit what you're doing. And have the respect for your audience to not insult their intelligence. We know shaming when we see it. Hell, you even dive right into patriarchal norms too! Toxic masculinity is too useful a tool, I suppose. That sounds like all the usual to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 09:10 PM
1

Therapy does help prevent you from being neurotic and laying baseless accusation on your partners or requiring extreme forms of external validation to assuage your anxieties Does it? Wow. It’s not healthy to be that suspicious of your partner just because they’re pregnant. That isn't the reason for any suspicion. That would be stupid. Hey, there doesn't even need to be suspicion. Maybe the dude just wants a dad certificate. Either way, he's the father and he has the right to get a paternity test…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 09:04 PM
1

Therapy doesn't prevent people from being cheated on. You can try to sound above it but being uncertain about whether you are a child's parent or not isn't something you're likely to experience so... Your opinion kinda doesn't matter here.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 08:52 PM
0

Trust but verify. I'm certain that most, if not all, people who have been cheated on trusted the cheater completely and never believed they would cheat so they didn't check shit. If you haven't cheated, then you shouldn't have to worry about the father having concrete proof. It can only benefit you. But hey, it could always be mandatory.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 08:48 PM
-1

you guys say on this sub, You are making a lot of assumptions about who is saying what based purely on gender. I don't tell any women anything of that sort because I don't believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 08:44 PM
0

as the bitter men on this sub say Who are the bitter men? Everyone has flairs that specify their general leanings. Are all of the men here bitter men who say the same things?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 08:36 PM
-1

You don't have to believe the truth for it to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 08:31 PM
0

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 08:30 PM
4

Wanting a paternity test is a legitimate reason to get a paternity test, whether you like it or not. You can take it as an accusation if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 08:25 PM
–

I did not say the word easy until my previous comment. I don't think it's easy. But I do think it's fairly simple. I don't know why you keep using that word to describe my thought on the matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 01:44 PM
–

Who said it was easy?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 01:40 PM
–

I think you're wrong. I am a human male and I feel this desire myself. But I also have self respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 01:37 PM
–

Not at all, it would just require men to no longer give a fuck about women's standards. Which would actually be equality. Women have been talking about decentering men for a good long time now. Well, maybe we should take a leaf out of their books. What's the downside? Most of us are repulsive to them anyways. Most of us apparently have no chance with them anyways. So why not just decenter them altogether?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 10:07 AM
32

Women certainly have it easier than men do That is literally the meaning of the statement because who elses experience are we even measuring?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 09:53 AM
1

Women already decided what the rules are Since when? the rules are they get to change their mind at their whim and men have to deal with it or go home lol Change their mind about what? There used to be a few norms around this that everyone followed and no, it didn't give women this ability to change their mind about absolutely everything at any time and men just had to deal. Expectations were much clearer back then. Now it's all fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 04:49 AM
1

This is actually an excellent question that I hardly ever see being asked. It's such a novel question that they can't actually understand what you're asking. Or they do understand, and they don't feel that they can answer because it will reveal something uncomfortable about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 10:17 PM
2

I don't think you have much experience with manosphere types at all because they absolutely do tell men who choose badly to choose better. They absolutely do tell them that they're at fault for choosing badly. Well, not all of them. But the manosphere isn't a single group and they don't all agree anyways. I would argue that usually red flags are harder to spot in women than in men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 10:09 PM
1

People have been saying this: men ruin the mood by continually interrupting the date, killing the vibe, and asking for explicit consent. Far longer than they have been saying this: "consent is sexy". And frankly, I think we've reached a point in time where women and society are going to have to decide once and for all what the damn rules are. Not people's personal preferences that become rules at random, but the actual social standards for these interactions. We've had years of changing rules ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 10:03 PM
0

I bet you would be ok if this post was about men. And you would loose
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:38 PM
0

umm... this is literally what I have said: There is no way to win as a woman, even if you do your best, it still won't guarantee you anything, This is pointlessly gendered, which is my point. Making it gendered is equivalent to writing, "woe is me!" Before every sentence. I'm a young woman (ig i still can be creepy?) Yes, you can be creepy. You are not above being a creep.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:14 PM
0

There is no way to win as a woman, even if you do your best, it still won't guarantee you anything Wtf? That's just life. Welcome to life. If you think "doing your best" guarantees any man anything then I have a bridge in China to sell you. because your "good before: / / /" is out of your control, c’est la vie. Cry many rivers. This is true for everyone, again. The only reason it's less true for men is because women go for older men. That's not exactly within our control either. Not only that, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 01:14 PM
1

You did disagree with me. And I disagreed with you too.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 11:41 AM
1

Nobody was talking about "romanticizing traditional gender roles" before you. I called this specific instance misandry after you labelled it internalized misogyny. I'm talking about this specific instance, which is an example of misandry. You are the one who refuses to use the proper term for whatever reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 10:09 AM
1

You should call it by it's proper name.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 09:18 AM
1

So did you and many others under this post. Are you going to give all of them crap for it or am I special to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 08:42 AM
1

Are you sure this is what always happens though? Nobody can be that certain about anything so personal to individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 08:35 AM
0

Amazing how men are the only group it's okay to tell to drop their standards, abide by their assigned gender roles yada yada. you have not lowered your standards to a reasonable level You can't just expect women to drop their standards to what you consider and deem "realistic and reasonable" if you're unwilling to drop yours. But, women can expect men to drop their standards while being unwilling to drop their own? Do I have that right? So instead of constantly complaining about women's standard…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 08:21 AM
2

We need more like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 08:15 AM
1

That isn't misogyny of any kind. That is misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 08:07 AM
3

It absolutely does, it's just less convenient for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 08:06 AM
1

The first two things sound realistic, a woman paying for all dates sounds absolutely unrealistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:22 AM
3

men online complain because they don’t like the idea of women having had a few bad experiences before them, and it makes themselves as feel as option B. No, men complain about women using them as emotional band aids after having those bad experiences. Everyone has bad experiences. Nobody likes being used as a way to address someone else's unpleasant past that they had nothing to do with.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:20 AM
2

Would these women even listen? Many women seem to be getting this same "Disney prince charming eternal love timeshare" by men. Yeah, and many women like to go for the same types of men. There are certain things women tend to respond to, and there are tonnes of dishonest men who knows what those things are. This is why the idea that a man approaching you first or paying for dates or whatever indicates his intentionality, honesty and generosity are truly stupid ideas that women insist to be true. …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:00 AM
1

Let's not. Please, be clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 06:50 AM
1

It really isn't even in the top 5 hardest jobs in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 06:27 AM
2

You're wrong. There are plenty of older women who are perfectly happy to do all of the petty shit you've described and tell the story in detail online.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 06:06 AM
3

By whom? And are men somehow immune from mockery? Do people not dare to mock men?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 05:12 AM
1

Okay. That's very nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 04:28 PM
18

Because they keep complaining about men not approaching them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 12:58 PM
3

Which norms benefit men?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 12:57 PM
21

Armpit hair? Your response is blue armpit hair? Anybody who dyes their armpit hair any color will be mocked to hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 07:37 AM
6

I would argue that everyone is obsessed with the social norms that dictate normalcy for men. a lot of women have been trying to move away from traditional ideas of womanhood Yet even among those women you will find a significant number who absolutely believe in rigid gender roles for men. Even among the staunchest, most "progressive" feminists you will find a significant number that are obsessed with dictating men's gender roles to them an will do so loudly, often and rudely as they can manage. …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 07:35 AM
2

It won't affect society? Uhm, what do you think society is?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 07:27 AM
2

Maybe don't take those men's words as gospel and just treat men like human beings.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 07:26 AM
1

"Women tell guys EXACTLY what they want with subtle hints.", That is the funniest thing I've read all day. If you are using subtle hints, you are not being exact. These things are mutually exclusive. In the clip she gives an example of how she left some dead flowers on the table that her boyfriend regularly passes so he'd notice them and buy her new flowers. My God, there is so much wrong with this. Just because you like flowers, doesn't mean he has a moral responsibility to get them for you as …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 04:08 PM
0

Where do you get off being so obnoxious about something that you don't even have to consider doing? You ever think that this attitude of yours is contributing to men not wanting to approach anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 09:28 AM
-1

Oh bullshit. Women are free to approach men. They are encouraged by men to do so. Who shames women for approaching first? Other women. Why would they do that if it's so forced? Do they want to be the ones to make the first approach most of the time? No they do not. They rudely fight against the idea every time it's brought up. Men don't need to force women to maintain a status quo that they prefer. And don't tell me shit about "patriarchy" forcing women to do this. They have their own agency, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 09:26 AM
3

Why is this born out of misogyny? It's because the woman is treated as the prize that the man must earn. I'll never understand how people can say this and then blame it on misogyny. The only losers in this situation are men. It literally creates privileges for women. It has nothing to do with hatred of any kind. And if this is misogyny, why do so many women prefer it that way? Are they stupid? Seriously, just try to convince women to take on this role instead. Listen to the responses you get. Ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 09:24 AM
1

Never. because it seems like many men think this is an effective method on women. And women don't? Women don't do this shit with men? You serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 09:20 AM
2

The idea that Iraq was about protecting people or defending America. It was an example of America doing Israel's dirty work. Nothing more, nothing less. And they still haven't recovered.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 04:04 PM
3

The lengths that people will go to to deny the very simple human aspect of this subject never ceases to amaze or disgust me. There are just a lot of lonely men living in a world that is constantly finding new ways to express its hatred for men. The elites don't have to do shit. It's regular people that are perpetuating this shit and refusing to look at it as a human issue experienced by humans for non political reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 04:00 PM
2

It isn't a matter of time, it's a matter of connection and affection. You can't expect a gift. You get one if you get one, and you don't if you don't. It's a different story if you're in a relationship but if you, like this woman, try to get a guy to get you a gift as some sort of test or because you "deserve" it, then you're not worth dating in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 03:56 PM
2

I don't know, man. When I have a boner I don't have enough blood in my brain to do math. I wouldn't even know how to quantify that in percentages.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 05:04 PM
4

Men were seen as the choosers, and women were just options. No, we weren't. The dating norms of men approaching and making all of the first moves, planning and paying for the date and all of that was still the norm back then. That norm alone puts women in the position of chooser. The difference between then and now is that men's language wasn't policed in the way it is today. Women are openly expressing their own preferences They have been doing this since before I was born. —like saying they wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 04:49 PM
1

No and yes. But it depends on what any of that means in particular.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 04:40 PM
0

I disagree with your conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 11:43 AM
3

If you say so.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 10:15 AM
5

It's not absurd when those are the stated reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 10:09 AM
3

That is not the reason that I'm referring to. Being straight isn't misandry. Thinking that bisexual men are somehow lesser, dirty, dangerous, or not real men is misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 10:01 AM
2

The reasoning is misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 09:59 AM
6

So? Let them hate then. They wouldn't have any qualms about saying things that you might find controversial.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 09:47 AM
0

And yet, you still find plenty of women volunteering the fact that they prefer men much older than them. I think you have bad information.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 09:38 AM
5

I don't care
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 09:36 AM
8

Is it really that difficult to call it misandry?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 09:23 AM
–

some women your lists These two statements alone show the problem with your logic: you cannot conceive of men as individuals, but you have no trouble doing so for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:58 PM
1

Notice how women have no agency in this story of yours. Things are done to them, they don't participate, they don't make decisions, they can't be toxic because they don't actually do things. That's kinda what you're saying. single moms wouldn't exist if men didn't abandon their kids or actually used condoms. Some single moms exist because the father died. And sometimes men use condoms and those condoms fail. Some women choose to exclude the father's of the child from the child's life completely.…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 10:50 AM
1

And red pillers are held in low esteem by everyone so who cares?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 06:53 AM
1

I would rather just stay alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:26 PM
4

Aww yisssss
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:21 PM
6

Because you don't. Those women are just greedy hypocrites who like to use archaic, patriarchal standards and toxic masculinity when it suits them. Nobody deserves "princess treatment" and nobody has the right to demand such a thing of another person. These are women riding on the coat tails of feminists who fought for equality, only to reverse the order and claim that it's what they deserve. Disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:20 PM
1

No "I love you"s This is a problem Doesn't do anything for Valentine's Day Not really a problem No pet names Maybe a problem, but I could live without pet names Doesn't hold hands when walking together Problem No "I am thinking of you" messages No random cute sticky notes left for you to find Meh Doesn't own any scented candles That's fine. No "good morning" texts Not a huge problem Doesn't plan dates Could be a problem, but not necessarily No kiss goodbyes Big problem Doesn't believe in love la…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 04:04 PM
1

Oh look, another dumb example of "men and women both do this, but people only care enough to say something about it in the case of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 01:35 PM
1

Absurd
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:15 PM
1

So we often hear that women don't need men. Which is true. They dont. Is it? I don't think it is. They may not need a man for survival, but people are not just their survival needs. And yes, men do need women. Even red pill men say so. But the idea that women don't need men is fiction. People need each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 01:17 PM
1

Maybe, but not because of some entitled expectation. I'll pay if I feel like doing something nice for a friend. My gender does not give me the responsibility to pay for your shit regardless of what you feel your "value" is or what you feel you deserve. That attitude would erode the friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 01:15 PM
–

I don't think most of them do that due to any incentive. They're just giving their opinions based on their personal experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 01:12 PM
21

Oh look, another bootstraps post aimed at men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 03:36 PM
4

What would be the point of this? The vast majority of women refuse to approach. Among that majority, there is a significant group that hates the idea so much that they will insult men for even thinking about "hinting" at a woman to approach them. Either women approach or they don't. And they mostly don't. There would be very little point to trying to develop a set of signals.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 03:39 PM
1

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 02:36 PM
1

Now as an extension of women making their own money, naturally that means they want a guy who is financially on par. Why is that natural?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 08:01 AM
1

Charlatan
/r/MensRights23/04/25 03:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter