TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cerebusial Archive

View 1 post and 21 comments by Cerebusial on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Cerebusial/r/MensRights22/02/12 03:50 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That's good. Get her on the job, if you already have a retainer. She will know how to work it. At the very least, she can get you started. IF she is at a total loss and can't do anything, send me a PM and maybe something else can be done. I know some folks in certain parts of upstate NY, and may be able to assist you.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 09:40 PM
1

Which part of rural upstate NY? If you can get cable, you can get a cable modem and have a decent connection. EDIT - the reason I say you is because maybe you can send a letter and offer to pay for the internet connection? Just a thought.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 09:37 PM
2

It sounds like a choice of law issue, really - as in, what is the right law to apply to a given situation. It's one of those issues that I assume crops up in these custody/support/family cases more often than in other fields. As such, really the only person that can assist you is a lawyer licensed in the appropriate jurisdiction(s), with experience in cross-jurisdictional choice of law issues. I don't know how many people are "experience" in something like that, however. So basically, there is n…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 06:02 PM
3

IT was my understanding that alterations to a custody agreement need to be approved by the court that approved the original agreement? Also, it sounds that your are implying/alleging that your ex is refusing to cooperate with the custody/visitation arrangement (which is created via court order). Refusal to comply with a court order of this sort can result in a peson being held in contempt, if I am not mistaken (but I could be, check with a lawyer in GA/SC about this). Also, as the original juris…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 05:16 PM
1

I meant she was gold-digging in the sense of trying to seek social acceptance. There are still many people out there that view having out-of-wedlock children as a social taboo. I was thinking she was gaining social stability, as well as future financial gains for her child - if the kid gets adopted, she becomes a legally recognizable heir of the adoptive father. I don't know, I'm just a cynical ass, I guess. EDIT - clarity
/r/MensRights22/02/12 10:12 PM
1

I think when I read it, it seemed like the girl was gold diggin', in a sense. My first inclination was that she was pushing for the adoption, not the guy, because she wanted to finally and fully distance herself from the junky-dad. I got that vibe, because after she took umbrage to him calling her psycho, she called him junky loser, or something like that. I think said to myself - there are two sides to every story, and I began to doubt her veracity. Whatever, I'm a pisces . . . EDIT - And also,…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 09:33 PM
-2

Here is my comment to the poster. Out of line?
/r/MensRights22/02/12 03:51 PM
3

Maybe I just interpreted your comment as being overly-broad, then. I know you were trying to be somewhat pithy, but acting like an emotional island only feeds into another negative perception of men - as being callous and uncaring. In my mind, it is appropriate to provide a support network for someone who is a good friend - and by good friend I mean someone who perceives you as an equal, treats you with respect, and can be relied upon in good times and bad. Obviously, how one gets to that point …
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:43 PM
11

I think you are missing the point. It's about the exhibited attitude toward men, ultimately - and the post captioned is prototypical of the current general view of men: as dopey, hopeless, and easily manipulated by the women in their lives, who are portrayed, and perceive themselves, as socially, emotionally and intellectually superior to those men. The goal is to live in true equality, in a world where you don't have to, nor do you feel the need to, play social mind games with people and their …
/r/MensRights20/02/12 04:44 AM
1

I respectfully disagree with your analysis - it is nothing more than nothing, at least for the purpose you had stated, from an evidentiary standpoint. All it would establish, essentially, is that the person writing the letter had not changed their version of events - but it doesn't establish OPs version as any "more" factual or relevant than anyone else's version. As I said above, it doesn't get to the truth of the matter asserted; the letter-writer in this scenario could just as easily have bee…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:17 PM
13

He may also consider looking into what it would take to find a lawyer that specializes in these school issues. There are often special education advocates and education advocates that have this sort of practice and nothing else. Schools are sort of like the police - once something is brought to them, they have to "follow it through" - and the system may be biased against the accused. And remember, don't trust anyone at the school, don't lie or hyperbolize your situation to gain sympathy, and don…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:58 AM
5

I've heard this before, and I am not aware of a scenario where doing this would be of any additional value to merely writing down your version of events. From an evidentiary standpoint, the fact that something was mailed and date-stamped does not automatically authenticate the document in any fashion, nor does it provide any real guaranty against alteration - one could have just as easily falsified their version of events prior to mailing as after. As such, I don't think the expense of mailing s…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:51 AM
4

Just a random thought - doesn't the reaction of the women in the study indicate some sort of knowledge of the intent of the provocatively dressed woman? What I mean is - these women, when judging the provocateur, are essentially saying "There's only one reason for her to dress that way - to get men's attention." However, the fact that women appear to recognize this in a near-universal fashion seems to indicate that all women would do this, if they could. And there's the real stinger - what reaso…
/r/MensRights05/01/12 08:11 PM
10

By what authority is the nursing student he interviews for this article equipped to provide meaningful analysis regarding the health benefits of circumcision? Someone should send a letter to the editor, pointing out that the "health benefits" she cites are based on flawed studies, and that the actual correlation between circumcision and decreased risk of STDs, etc., is minimal. Furthermore, the issues of phimosis and paraphimosis are held out as being risks associated with non-circumcision, but …
/r/MensRights11/11/11 07:48 AM
8

The problem with saying someone lied about something like this is that it is totally unprovable. No one else was there, no one else knows what transpired, how decisions were made, etc. You say she lied. I'm sure she says you just didn't bother to use protection. Of course there is no solution to this problem - short of having some sort of "in case of conception" contract. But seriously, when you're about to get your swerve on, who's thinking about the legalities? I agree that it sucks to get stu…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 03:59 PM
2

I don't mean to go against the grain, but we don't "know" that, that's just what one person said. We don't know whether she passed any tests, physical or otherwise. We have the statements/opinions of one guy who said she will never "pass muster" because she was merely a political, gender-based hire. I'm all for supporting mens' rights, and if the woman were in fact hired solely because she's a woman and unable to meet the physical/emotional/academic requirements, then that is certainly problemat…
/r/MensRights03/10/11 02:22 PM
-1

Here's my question, and I have to first say that all of my knowledge re: the world of fire-fighting comes from the movie Backdraft -- if there is a probie, why would they just leave that person up to their own devices? I am no feminist in any way, but I consider myself to be rational and fair. Below it is suggested that the veterans on this force "knew" that she didn't pass the tests, but the story doesn't definitively say that, it only offers the conjecture of one guy, who says that in the futu…
/r/MensRights03/10/11 02:16 PM
3

Men are forced to candy coat things, then a) get treated with contempt by the woman for trying to "evade" (when we often are trying to protect and help), b) get belittled by the woman involved for candy coating, c) get bitched at by the woman involved when the woman is later forced to face the cold harshness of reality (i.e. the candy coating really IS just a coating), and then d) still have to clean up the mess; all the while being belittled and demeaned by the rest of society. FTFY
/r/MensRights09/08/11 07:18 PM
1

I found the article to be fairly short on any real evidence in the form of a study performed by scientific (or even quasi-scientific (sociologist, psychologist, etc.) academics. So it is like the opinion of some woman who wrote a book on the subject . . . sure, no agenda there. Also, many cases doubtless go unreported or undetected, such as very young mothers who kill their newborns by smothering them or drowning them in a toilet after hiding the entire pregnancy. Well, sure - obviously it's got…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 06:13 PM
3

Maybe I'm totally wrong, but this seemed to me to be the point of the article in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 08:37 PM
1

Part of the US Constitution says that the various states are supposed to give equal protection under the law. (This is not my specialty and you should ABSOLUTELY verify this with an appropriate legal authority, AKA local lawyer.) As such, a court decree made in South Carolina should be equally enforceable in any state in the union, UNLESS there are some intervening/additional facts that would require a modification of the order (i.e. a parent becomes a drug addict, abuses the kid, or something s…
/r/MensRights27/05/11 05:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter