TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cerenex Archive

View 0 posts and 167 comments by Cerenex on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think your comment speaks volumes. But not for the reasons you think it does.
/r/seduction04/04/25 05:53 PM
3

I think there's a better question you can ask yourself here. What would you like your gym space to be? Is it a place to work out and develop yourself physically, or is it also a place to pick up chicks on top of the workout? And is she being accommodating to that outlook of yours - whatever you choose it to be - or not? If she really has taken an interest in you - and if it's more than just a fleeting curiosity - she'll find a way to get your attention, even if you ignore her within the gym itse…
/r/seduction04/04/25 01:41 PM
27

Bit of a side tangent to this, but the biggest improvement in my composure followed from the decision to dispel fantasy ideals about people. It's very easy to prop others up to a point where you'd swear their shit doesn't stink - but the reality is that everyone is flawed, and failing to recognize and acknowledge the signs of disagreement, incompatibility, and even poor chemistry will see you chasing after larger-than-life figments of your own imagination. The worst part is, you'll convince your…
/r/seduction03/04/25 02:00 PM
1

It's not that I disagree with the overall point of your message, but my read on the scenario you describe is a bit different from yours. It sounds like the guy was experiencing post breakup grief - which is something you'd expect after a relationship, especially if it was a good relationship (and case in point, he didn't break it off, she did). My last relationship was 7 years, and once I actually had time to process the loss, it took me almost 18 months to work through everything I was feeling.…
/r/seduction26/03/25 09:15 AM
8

You hit the nail on the head. Learning how to seduce a woman has value long after the casual dating stage. Yet if you read OPs post, you get the genuine impression that some guys are never planning for anything serious whatsoever.
/r/seduction07/02/25 10:05 AM
1

Peace, brother. If you prefer instigating your interactions with women, by all means do so. I'm just offering my own perspective. My impression from the guy you originally responded to is that this isn't an issue of quantity (or lack thereof) for him, but rather an energy investment thing. A woman who likes you enough to express interest is - again in my experience - going to make it easier for you to meet up, date, spend time together ect. They want you in the picture. Which translates to less …
/r/seduction15/01/25 04:45 PM
3

While I believe you are offering this suggestion in good faith, it doesn't make sense within the context of what the person you are responding to has stated they value - i.e. not wasting their time/energy. Speaking from my own experience, the most success I've had while dating is with women who didn't need to be convinced to give me a shot. Women make things easier for men they are interested in from the get-go. Better to build oneself up and see who takes a liking to the path you've chosen in l…
/r/seduction15/01/25 01:38 PM
5

Your concluding remark is apt. That one should avoid giving in to nihilism and despair. With that said, I wouldn't dismiss the fact that some of the sentiments expressed online by individuals we would consider obnoxious have nevertheless managed to infiltrate into the institutions intended to govern and / or contribute to a functional society. From there, metrics, support and open platforms for discourse can be skewed in favor of one ideologically possessed group, to the detriment of their perce…
/r/MensRights02/02/24 04:32 PM
42

The way I see it, the kind of person trying to shame someone else for having a need to stay connected with friends is - ironically - doing me the favor of waving their red flags in my face. I consider myself very fortunate to have a tight knit group of friends. We don't hang out in person very often due to work obligations (gotta keep the lights on, at the end of the day), but we've found ways to compensate and keep in touch, even if it's just through a few daily comments on a private shitpostin…
/r/MensRights02/02/24 02:50 PM
1

Your comments suggest otherwise about yourself. This marks the conclusion of our discussion. I encourage you not to afford so much influence to perceived coercive forces in your life, especially from acquaintances and strangers whose insight into your life can be directly restricted by you to a great extent. You were not born to be a puppet, dancing to the whims of loosely associated neo-puritans.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 09:56 PM
2

I did not merely say different societies hold different views and opinions. I said Humanity holds different views and opinions, which encompasses people within the same country who share a national heritage. Just look at the United States or the majority of modern day Europe if you need examples of political divisiveness within the same populace. What is being discussed in this post crosses no legal boundary and involves indidivuals who both consent to a course of action that specifically pertai…
/r/MensRights26/12/23 09:32 PM
2

The word respect didn't feature in my post. The words disagree, dislike and despise did, which denotes a scaling level of animosity - to the point where a person wishes ill-will upon you for your views if they reach the third camp. As to your second statement, it should be plainly evident that humanity does not share consensus on a great many topics in the modern day. A person who would be deemed a pariah in one camp would be openly accepted in another. We're a social species, sure. But even the…
/r/MensRights26/12/23 09:13 PM
12

What you've heard has little to do with concern for women in their early 20's and more to do with older women wanting to stamp out the competition for successful, older men. Men are generally valued by women for their ability to provide, moreso than physical appearance. Just look at the likes of George Lucas and the late Hugh Hefner if you want proof of this fact taken to its most extreme form. As you advance in your area of work, build up skills and aquire status/renown/resources, you become mo…
/r/MensRights26/12/23 07:52 PM
4

This advice is honestly just dismissive. You cannot please everyone on this Earth; no matter how hard you try. There will always be things people disagree with you on, dislike you for, even despise you for, even for things that are completely legal (owning certain breeds of dog, eating meat, buying Nestle products ect.) You will have to dismiss a great many opinions and views over the course of your life, if you hope to navigate this minefield of contending interests.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 07:17 PM
1

Ja nee.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/19 12:19 PM
139

I met a girl in college. We got along very well, started hanging out regularly. She wanted a friend; I wanted more, and I was willing to nuke the friendship for a shot at a relationship with her. So when the moment was right, I made my move... That girl is now my SO. We've been dating for several years and are moving in together next year.
/r/seduction20/09/19 01:21 PM
2

I understand that, yes, there is definitely a double standard that would be applied if the reverse happened - mainly originating from the feminist camp. But then, we are talking about a subset of women who look at life as a continual power-struggle between men and women. I wonder if ordinary, sane women would really care what other women consent on?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:41 PM
24

She wouldn't be able to call your gender into question, however, without intersectional feminists sinking their teeth into her for being a bigot.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 10:41 AM
10

like, are you retarded? seriously, This coming from the guy randomly foaming at the mouth about Jews is rich. You hear 'venture', and assume this must mean a business or a service, as opposed to a physical product being made. Watt's himself referenced the making of clothes for this observation: a physical product. A product that breaks faster has lost quality. It is no longer as durable as it could be - which is an action done/undertaken at the expense of the consumer in the case of planned obso…
/r/PussyPass28/05/19 01:59 PM
21

Is that why we now have planned obsolescence built into electronic devices? Or phones where the battery can't be removed without breaking it, for instance? Or rampant gambling (lootboxes) in the video gaming industry? You conflate innovation with cutting corners for profit. Do I even need to address that you sound positively deranged in your last paragraph?
/r/PussyPass28/05/19 12:28 PM
20

Alan Watts made a very good observation, applicable to this scenario: if you pursue any venture with the ultimate goal of making money, the venture itself is likely to suffer in quality as you pursue ever greater sums of income. The argument is that cutting corners and compromising one's principles is easy when the core principle you base your work on is more money = good.
/r/PussyPass28/05/19 11:03 AM
112

I'd really like to know what goes through the mind of a typical school administrator when they opt to expell a student with clear evidence (as seems to be the case here) of having done nothing wrong: Are the administrators reasoning from a pragmatic standpoint: that the financial loss from a lawsuit is preferable to the fallout potentially generated if they don't align with progressive, outrage politics? Or are the administrators acting from a genuine conviction in their own moral superiority; c…
/r/PussyPass28/05/19 09:09 AM
2

I'm not exactly clear on what you are referring to when you say 'this shit', but if you are referring to giving support to homeless shelters or giving food/clothing to beggars instead of directly offering them money, perhaps this will offer some food for thought: What you are offering that homeless person is an expedient path. You are offering him pleasure that will be short-lived and ultimately see him waking up to an even worse situation (further bereft of a decent meal, for one thing). That m…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/19 10:55 AM
3

I'm genuinely curious what you'd say if you encountered a no-drugs policy teetotaller?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/19 09:09 AM
6

I've told you where to go. I can lead a horse to water but I can't make you drink. Go check it out for yourself. Relying on others to spoon feed you information is about as pathetic as you trying to argue this point. Logical Fallacy: Attempting to shift the burden of proof. The burden of proof lies on you to prove the assertion you are making through presenting evidence that backs that assertion. If you cannot support your assertion with evidence; your assertion may be dismissed without evidence…
/r/MensRights26/12/18 08:00 PM
5

But many of the controversial ideas are offensive because they are based on lies, twisted facts, or deceptive logic that many people are not equipped to understand. To which I would ask the following: do you believe that people are incapable of equipping themselves with the knowledge to understand these ideas just because they initially lack it? In other words, do you take a deterministic stance on a person's given condition in life? If not; and if people can therefore learn and improve, I would…
/r/MensRights26/12/18 07:38 PM
3

Yes, but those of us who are not ideologically-possessed zealots would still very much like it if you hang around with us. :)
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:51 AM
1

You continue to suggest I condone this criminal behavior Was he a willing partner? You are attempting to shift responsibility onto a child of 14, for actions in which we do not consider them to be legally culpable. That is exactly what you have been saying and what I am calling you out on. I will say this once more: the child is in no way at fault for the actions taken by opportunistic adults. The adult, being the individual who should know better, is responsible. Whether that adult deceives the…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 02:28 AM
2

You are presupposing your entire argument on the notion that the child somehow understands the full extent of what they are agreeing to at that age, and that this somehow lessens the penalty of the offense since "the child thought it was a good idea". The entire point behind a legal age of consent is that we as a society deem individuals below a certain age to be incapable of making this decision with an appropriate level of understanding. That is why the law protects them from opportunistic adu…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 12:39 AM
19

As absurd as it sounds, I think there is something positive to be said of the fact that yes, life is suffering - but we also possess the strength to endure it. As humans we continually strive to seek meaning and purpose in a Universe where there is none to be found innately. Life is a convenient, brief blip of consciousness, brought about by a large enough collection of molecules banding together long enough to form what we call a human. The philosopher Albert Camus explains it in better detail …
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:16 AM
14

I got participation-banned from their sub for posting a joke comment in /r/The_Donald. So about as easy as getting wet in the ocean.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/18 10:28 PM
0

You're just a run-of-mill idiot commenting on shit they know nothing about. There was no joke here.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/18 06:00 PM
20

You are presuming this on the unsubstantiated assumption that other men share your mindset when it comes to parenting. I would never dispute that you'd be that kind of father, since you clearly argue from that position. But you don't speak for myself or other men.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/18 08:21 AM
5

But doesn't that run contrary to the age-old accepted stereotype that girls mature faster than boys?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/18 08:19 AM
0

This teacher probably got caught because the kid was bragging. This leads me to doubt that you read the article.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/18 08:15 AM
18

But you're saying we should be like Lobsters?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/18 01:50 PM
1

Does this sound familiar? It's not the guy's job to CONTROL "his" woman. She's an adult who can make her own intelligent decisions. So on the one hand, you acknowledge women have free agency. On the other, you seem to be of the dire misconception that women have no-free agency (and I quote: "its like a reflex") when it comes to "testing men". I regret to inform you that, yes in fact, women do have control of whether or not they want to play games with their partner. The only reason you seemingly…
/r/seduction26/12/17 05:12 AM
1

I outright stated I am not a legal expert. However, in my layman understanding of things (which I am even open to being corrected on, as I stated in my initial comment) these are two separate allegations both meriting their own cases. However, I do see your point. I did misinterpret what he was saying.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/17 06:27 PM
9

Often, women will test you by pushing the boundaries a bit e.g. flirting with other guys in front of you. If you enjoy women who play games like that with you, that's your business. Me, I like women who are secure enough to know what they want, without resorting to such nonsense.
/r/seduction23/12/17 11:49 AM
1

This idiot doesn't speak for me.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/17 02:58 PM
1

For the individuals who want to argue that this will somehow discourage people (in particular, women) from coming forward to accuse their rapists, consider the following: To consider an individual eligible for something like this, I'd argue two things would have to happen: The accused must be found not guilty of the crime (the requirement for conviction of proof beyond a reasonable doubt was not met). There has to be evidence that the accuser had in fact fabricated their accusation (again, requi…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/17 10:41 AM
10

I'm not the guy you were in conversation with, but part of the (limited) fun when dealing with SJW's is seeing the facade melt away as the conversation carries on.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:49 PM
1

Wait... stating that the viewpoint of a small minority of individuals on an Internet forum dedicated to victimhood and self-appeasement, is coloured by an obsession with victimhood and self-appeasement is being a demagogue now? Strawman argumentation. My complaint was against both your desperate reliance on proof by assertion as an attempted substitute for factual evidence to your claims, and your referring to people as "listless", "insecure", "afraid" and insisting on the need to "Ffs, grow a s…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 01:29 PM
12

Mate, this isn't a debate. Not from your end, no. Your position lacks any form of factually-based substantiation, other than logical fallacies (particularly proof by assertion). In case you weren't aware (and clearly you aren't, else you wouldn't be posting your tirades here in the first place), demagoguery is not a substitute for a rational, well-backed argument. I feel no compulsion or obligation to point out common sense. The burden of proof is on you to substantiate your claims, since you ar…
/r/MensRights30/10/17 02:45 PM
7

... 'ya git'? Quick, which color is best?
/r/MensRights24/11/16 03:05 PM
0

Did you or did you not make the very absolute, black-and-white statement that: criminals don't make a risk reward calculation. If you did, you are the sham, not the person I'd compare to the sham.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 07:38 AM
0

By your reasoning, security measures are an absolutely pointless venture in terms dissuading crime, since you believe criminals are not capable of weighing up risks like normal human beings. You'd fair atrociously where I'm from.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 10:06 AM
1

Yet you offer no explanation as to why you think so.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 11:05 AM
9

Why is it that so few individuals presented with this scenario ever consider the fact that less individuals would be inclined to commit crime in the face of harsher penalties? You won't dissuade a guilty man an ounce with this kind of mindset, in terms of penalties. But you will provide potential criminals with significantly higher consequences to weigh against the benefits of committing a crime. If a false accusation could land you in prison for the same duration, how many individuals would sti…
/r/MensRights15/07/16 11:54 PM
1

I wouldn't say this qualifies, simply for the reason that the cosplayer did not get the proverbial free meal ticket she was hoping for. She was denied, and now some people are upset over the whole affair.
/r/PussyPass14/05/16 09:45 AM
7

Consider the following excerpt: "If we want to close the pay gap and make a difference, it is the road to the top jobs that needs to be the focus. This is the pay gap problem.” Nowhere in that article is the suggestion made that the road to the top jobs needs to be changed/altered. The road to the top jobs still entails: Working the hardest out of your competitive pool of peers. Longer hours at work. Emphasis on the job/company, rather than the individuals personal-pursuits (such as wanting to b…
/r/MensRights12/05/16 01:31 PM
12

The same reason you still have anti-vaccine/GMO cults. These groups are of the genuine belief that the system is trying to fool them/screw them over. What would pass as sound evidence to a normal person is treated with suspicion to the point of outright paranoia.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 01:20 PM
2

He's not a hermit. You have no substantiation for this statement.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 02:08 PM
34

Honestly, who is being sexist here? The people who take grievance with her lack of professional conduct, finding it severely lacking? Ie the people treating her to a level playing field, Or the people who feel she is too frail to handle critique because she is a woman, completely disregarding her agency and capability to accept responsibility for her actions?
/r/MensRights10/05/16 01:41 PM
1

The image you conjured up in my head is that of a random, complete stranger walking up to lone_wanderer101 and accusing him of rape. Barring complete insanity, on what grounds would he be at risk of inflaming a false accusation in the first place? He doesn't even engage them in conversation.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 01:24 PM
1

Take a look at the ever increasing presence of counter-feminist movements. With every passing scandal (Rolling Stones Rape Article, Protein World, any form of protest action against speakers such as Hoff Sommers and Yianoppoulos, aka Trigglypuff), the contemporary feminist movement is alienating more and more people. When I joined this subreddit back in June 2011, there were ~60000 people subscribed to this sub. In 5 years, we've gained 57000 more people in the sub alone. Now consider the additi…
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:16 PM
1

I think you underestimate the implications of this in the long-term. Its called flogging the dead horse. After a while, blanket terms start to lose their punch, especially in the absence of substantiating arguments.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 08:13 AM
12

There's a certain comedic beauty to feminist rhetoric. What does it say to the wider-world when the best response you can come up with is a blanket term like "he's dangerous", in response to someone criticizing your views? And that you seemingly refrain from providing any form of critical reasoning as to why you are of that opinion when pressed to elaborate? It portrays you as someone so reliant and hobbled by an ideology to provide answers to your life, that you have foregone the need (and poss…
/r/MensRights02/05/16 05:05 PM
3

"I want everyone to know that this hurts boys as much as girls." Because its 2016.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 06:11 PM
0

You are made up of exactly the same stuff, you're just on the "men's team". If you were a woman, you'd be those exact pseudo feminists, arguing with other moderates right now on /r/feminism. On what basis do you classify them pseudo-feminists? Feminism is a self-identifying philosophy. Are you saying you are, what, some kind of puritan example of what feminism should be? Tell us then, what should a "real" feminist think of transgenderism? What about the gender wage gap? Are real feminists sex-po…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 06:24 PM
0

Congratulations on dodging all my points. If you had read further, instead of getting triggered like a SJW, you would have read some substantiating arguments. Feminism is about trying to create equal rights for women as men. Based on meaningless platitudes; not their actions. Any person with a modicum of media-awareness could tell you that.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 01:28 PM
1

I'm sorry I don't blindly just agree with shitty propagandistic posts just because they're loosely aligned with my beliefs. You hold to the belief that feminism is an inherently good movement that has not been corrupted by radical elements; while the MRA is of the opinion that (with notable exceptions such as Hoff Sommers) the majority of the vocal, active component of feminism is radicalized and steeped in cultural marxist ideas. The difference that you fail to see, however, is that feminism is…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 11:41 AM
0

I will simply repeat my question: How is uncovering a lie the same as spreading a lie? You've yet to explain how any of the above mentioned is bullshit. The burden of proof lies on you to do so if you want to get anywhere with anyone. Are you saying 1 in 5 women are raped on campuses, for instance? Would you care to substantiate your viewpoint if that is the case?
/r/MensRights31/01/16 10:23 AM
1

I'm simply asking what it is you intend to accomplish here? Are you hoping to shout at people until they see your point of view? Seems to me that if all this is garbage, you are spending your time rather poorly.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 10:11 PM
1

How exactly is pointing out blatant lies equivalent to spreading the lies in the first place? Do you have examples where the MRA blatantly spread lies and falsehoods? Frankly, why even comment here, if it is such absolute trash? If that were the case, you seem oddly intrigued by trash. Are you a fly?
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:16 PM
3

I've seen Tumblrinas. But to go so far out of one's way to smear this message all over campus with flyers; to actively incite outrage and fear and point towards mobilization as the answer. That speaks to both the level of zealotry, and the extent to which these SJW's have taken control of the narrative on this campus.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 03:49 AM
1

The problem with that is you're assuming Feminism is faithful to the Marxist paradigm. Have you seen modern-day feminism's approach towards the cis-white male? What do you make of the Patriarchy theory? In what way do you feel these are not true to the Marxist philosophy? The assumption that Women are an oppressed minority in the same way African Slaves & their descendents have been understood is probably a large part of the problem. And who is forwarding that assumption? Perhaps the group claim…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 04:28 AM
2

I don't know where you are situated in the world, but being quite clear that you have a disdain for feminism, based on your own analysis of their standpoint, would certainly go a long way to alleviating concerns among the men in your life. Substantiate your viewpoint and discuss it with potential partners. In many Western countries, where the system is happy to tear apart a man's life for the purported slighting of a woman, knowing that your romantic interest is aware and in deviance of such abs…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 02:57 AM
2

Third wave feminism is based on Social Marxism. The idea of a class based system, where one class is the oppressor and the other class is the perpetually oppressed, originates from the socialist ideas coined by Marx. These ideas are staunchly in opposition to the idea of a meritocratic, capitalist system, which is likely where the "Anti-Western" statement originates from. In what way is feminism not collectivist? The experiences of women are certainly generalized to fit a narrative. Within the c…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 02:42 AM
6

I think some companies are starting to see the potential value of this, and taking cues from Protein World's positive sales in light of belligerent feminist criticism to their advertising campaign back in April. Tumblr feminism is essentially in the process of becoming a valuable business commodity, by virtue of being overly-sensitive and aggressively outspoken against any and all forms of perceived offense.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 06:07 PM
8

My integrity compels me to share this study, that would seem to indicate over-funding for several types of cancer's, notably prostate and breast cancer. I'm not saying the disproportionate funding is excused or handwaved by this. But I thought it might be of some comfort to some men to know that the funding for prostate cancer, according to the study's findings, is adequate for what is currently required.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 02:47 PM
0

I think the important thing to remember is that we are, essentially, dealing with a relatively shrill minority. The fact that feminists themselves are concerned about a decline in the movements popularity, and express that sentiment quite openly (HeForShe, as an example), is indicative that the feminist movement is not as broadly accepted by the public as they would like. In light of this I am of the opinion that, if the documentary substantiates its arguments against feminism with factual, easi…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 12:03 PM
1

Thank you for the link. I have to say that is very heartening news.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 11:46 AM
7

If you can link and provide proof of that, I'll reconsider. At the moment, I have nothing but your word on it being true. Call me cynical. But frankly, I'm drawing parallel's with Anita Sarkeesian's "I was harassed" strategy of getting funding.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 11:50 PM
17

So... the only winning move is not to play? How about a nice game of chess?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:08 PM
1

Thank you for this. You put it perfectly.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:01 PM
6

“You know, very intentionally asking, ‘Is this okay? Is this okay?’ It was cute. It was great.” Sure, in the same way that a dripping faucet is "great" when you're trying to get some sleep. It gets old. Really fast. EDIT: Spelling.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 12:56 PM
1

"Awe?" Are you from Cape Town?
/r/seduction15/10/15 09:33 PM
2

These MensRights guys are exactly who you suspected they were. Men and women who expect concrete evidence; as opposed to mindlessly jumping in to dry off your crocodile tears?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 02:55 PM
4

There's always a feminist like you that just has to hop on board, huh? Your intentions are quite transparent. Especially considering that you felt the need to claim death threats in an edit, while the moderators have heard no word of it. Who do you think you're fooling?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 02:44 PM
20

What I find infuriating is the idiot white knight only responding when the guy decides to fight back. As if everything that happened before that moment didn't even register on his radar.
/r/PussyPass27/08/15 05:03 PM
38

So if someone's emotional state is unbalanced enough to attempt hiring a hitman to kill their spouse, they are still considered stable enough to take custody of their children. Good to know.
/r/PussyPass25/08/15 01:39 PM
2

Not sure that you need to be masculine to pull that off. Being a rational, independent, critical thinker will get you the exact same results.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:22 AM
1

There is something significantly out of place in a mind such as this. To actually consider any form of association with an entire gender to be utterly worthless, a chore, without any benefit to be had. To see no possible example in the whole of human history where our two genders have worked together for a common good. To be utterly unable to fathom the idea of a sincere and healthy relationship between a man and a woman, as friends or something more. To honestly believe that the contributions o…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 12:04 PM
2

If you were here for honest discourse, you wouldn't have rolled out the red carpet by claiming you were a male feminist. If you wanted discourse, you would have simply asked a sensible question. Thus far, I haven't seen a shred of supporting evidence from your side either. You claim that the views /r/Mensrights hold are the outdated view of feminism. Have you even seen our front page? Taken a look at some of the top posts? Or read our FAQ? If you honestly feel you are in the right, post your sta…
/r/MensRights29/06/15 01:09 AM
2

I meant in person. So its not whether people insult you but rather whether they are upfront about it or not that upsets you? Sigh, you accuse us of cherry picking and then make generalizations about our knowledge base. You clearly didn't come here for logical discourse. That much was readily apparent from the start.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 12:35 AM
2

And we've always been at war with Eastasia.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 12:04 AM
1

We're not disrupting your meetings or trying to impede your *actins*. I would hope not. Actin is rather an important polymer in the human body. We're not murderers, dammit!
/r/MensRights28/06/15 11:50 PM
5

I've never heard been called retarded by one. & I've been called all kinds of things just for existing, so what does that say about this group? You've never been called retarded by feminists, huh? Valerie Solanas, a prominent American Feminist was quoted as saying: "The male is a biological accident: the y(male) gene is an incomplete x(female) gene, that is, has an incomplete set of chromosomes. In other words, the male is an incomplete female, a walking abortion.... To be male is to be deficien…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 11:45 PM
2

I suppose it ultimately depends on what the men doing the shoveling thought of this. On rare occasions I share past papers and notes with women in my class. Am I being manipulated by the pretty looks? Hardly. I got those papers and notes from women and men I hardly knew in the first place. No expectations, no strings attached. They were just kind enough to offer me a copy. Now I'm simply doing the same for someone else in turn. Girl in this article is still a massive douche, though.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 11:03 AM
3

Not saying this isn't a possibility. But wouldn't it be more practical to say, shovel your neighbors driveway then? Or your block's driveways? Or anywhere that is closer at hand, for that matter?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:48 AM
8

Lets be frank here: this modern wave feminism is intentionally defined to have the broadest, vaguest possible definition of what their goal is, regardless of the movements actual intents. It's a smokescreen that allows the radicals to suppress what would otherwise be considered sound counter-arguments, by claiming it as part of their ideals. Feminist: We need feminism because women and feminine traits are always exclusively considered to be inferior. (insert the usual "throw like a girl", "run l…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 02:34 AM
5

I've tried doing that. Several times. But the end result is usually the same: a gaggle of enraged women frothing at the mouth, spewing their doctrine with barely contained hatred, and a small entourage of pro-feminist men kissing their asses, glossing over faults in their reasoning as clear as daylight, and ganging up on activists like myself to the point where I can't keep up. Holding the line is important. But there's only so much a lone man can accomplish without backup.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:59 PM
8

I laughed at this. I wasn't angry, or infuriated. I was laughing. This woman, like so many others, is shell-shocked. Not because she comprehends the true underlying issue, but because the natural, logical response - by men- to a society biased against men is leading to her to miss out on some rose-tinted ideal she had about her own life. An ideal nurtured and perpetuated by feminist dogma. That she is entitled to having men run after her, pursue her, try to win her over, marry her, have kids wit…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 12:34 PM
1

I find it very encouraging to see how much our numbers have grown on this subreddit since I joined up around two years back. Frankly, I think this particular "protest" played an important role in opening quite a few eyes to what feminism truly is about.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:45 PM
128

She's equal parts disrespectful, entitled, conceited, and detached from reality - all at the same time. The Feminist mentality at it's finest, ladies and gentleman.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 09:30 AM
6

That's... a very absolute statement in and of itself.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:36 AM
2

Reading the post in this thread do you really think these guys are worried about women's issues? I think you should scroll up to /u/46n2arejustaheadofme 's post. It explains and alleviates your concerns quite well.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:27 AM
5

You CAN be fired from a job for being an MRA. You can't for being a feminist. Which is why, as always, you have to be smart about it. Pick the right opportunities to enact some meaningful change. The rest of the time, just lay low, smile and nod politely.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:13 AM
2

I just wish I could believe women aren't shallow. See, where I was incredulous, you sound sad about the fact. Don't be. And happy birthday! :)
/r/seduction09/01/14 01:02 AM
1

Well, if an old dude is reminiscing on my statement, I must be on the right track. ;)
/r/seduction09/01/14 12:39 AM
27

I'm suddenly viewed as a human being rather than a dick on a stick. Just because you have a girlfriend? Are women really that shallow?
/r/seduction08/01/14 02:32 PM
1

The thing is how long do you wait? Most women might be okay about not getting married for a fair while, but not living together? It will just not happen. If she can't understand your concern on the matter, then logically you are not dealing with a woman who is worth your time. And where I'm from, living together is not nearly as mainstream as where you are from, judging just from your incredulous statement. I thought part of the MGTOW movement was not buying into the perceived gender roles of mo…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:17 PM
1

I don't have equal opportunities because of my race, not my gender. I have equal rights in all other respects. We don't have conscription. We don't even have a very functional military to speak of. As for the other queries, I'll say this: a lot of the issues that get blown up over the top in other parts of the world don't have an effect here. If you get raped by a woman here, our court system is more than happy to punish the offender, without bias, if proven guilty by due court procedure (read: …
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:56 PM
1

Maybe the answer lies in trying until you find someone who is willing to wait around until you've been convinced? It's a long shot, definitely, but it's a much safer shot, no?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 01:43 PM
6

For you up in America? I agree. Except for two key points: 1) The average non-crazy American woman isn't vocal about said fact, so it really isn't fair to lump them all into one category. Yes, I understand woman have absurd amounts of power at their disposal, feminist or not, and no I actually do understand and respect why you choose to limit contact because of that fact. But number two, and more prominent. 2) For all the horrible stories I've read here on Mensrights, and as true and urgent as t…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 03:02 AM
2

Please tell me your lying. I can't even enact my own right to say no without being screwed over??
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:18 PM
3

Well, what about women like Karen Straughan? They are few and far between, but for women like her, I have a lot of respect.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:15 PM
4

My only concern with this is the exact functioning of the pill. The female intended version tends to seriously fuck around with their body's biochemistry. I've had a friend of mine crying over grass (as in, the plant you cover your lawn with), when she started taking the pill. And nowadays, well, it doesn't sound likes she's all that eager for physical intimacy with her SO. Frankly, I'd rather not turn into an asexual husk just to switch off my production line, useful as it might be.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 02:58 PM
1

Look at it this way, if you didn't tick the "women" box, what's the only other gender you could possibly help, by default?
/r/MensRights06/12/13 11:23 PM
1

Helpful! Thank you for sharing! :)
/r/seduction27/09/13 12:11 PM
3

You can't take chances with that kind of thing, no.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:53 PM
3

I know. But at that moment in time, I found the change quite jarring.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:37 PM
16

Believe me, all she did was beat me to the punch on that one, so to speak. :)
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:24 PM
2

And this is the whirlwind that is being reaped after feminists sowed the seeds of male hatred in the wind... Would you please state what you mean by that? I don't want to jump to wrong conclusions and get into a senseless argument over a misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:23 PM
3

It's absurd really. But in that particular case it wasn't feminism that was screwing us over, but a business tycoon who simply decided to exploit the glamorous expectations of even the most decent of women to indirectly screw us over. I both applaud his ingenuity and find myself disgruntled because of it.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 06:02 PM
9

It's medieval Europe and you are a nobleman. You have a woman in your life who is sweet, caring, and has a warm personality. You decide to show your affection by picking her a rose fresh from the garden. She appreciates the gesture and, in it's own small way, the two of you grow closer together. It's not what you'd normally do, but for her you can spare a romantic gesture on occasion. Perfectly normal human behavior. Nothing at all wrong with this. At the next banquet, however, your beloved deci…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:33 PM
46

I actually had an old high-school classmate, lets call her Jessi, who once posted "I long for the days when men would hold doors open for women. Where is Chivalry now?" I responded with the exact statement posted in this heading, and cited that women cannot demand both special treatment and equal treatment simultaneously, as by definition that would not constitute equal treatment of both genders. Over the course of the 7 hours that followed the posting of that comment, I found myself ganged up o…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 04:49 PM
13

Our sons will suffer for this generation of slacking and gaming. I'm not planning on having offspring. And the society I'm in clearly doesn't give a flying fuck about me or my rights. So I will enjoy my life as best I still can, improve myself and broaden my intellectual horizons. Because quite frankly, I don't care what happens to this earth after I'm gone. I know that's a horrible mindset, but that's what it is.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:58 AM
10

They could make masturbation illegal. -That, my friend, is the day world war three breaks out.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:40 AM
6

Yep, if this trend continues, then eventually "feminists" will start spewing that men will have to "man up" and take these risks, have to be a father. I thought one of the goals of feminism was to promote "the independent, highly successful, single mom who doesn't need a man in her life, ever?".
/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:23 AM
17

And, in more of a "here-and-now" sense, terrifying.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:07 AM
4

This is the first time I've ever seen someone link to tv tropes on Reddit. And I have to say as an avid browser of the site I couldn't agree more with the comparison. Thanks for pointing this out.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:08 AM
1

I just want to remark, that the article doesn't tell us if she getting alimony or not. It's not right to assume that it's not her money from her job. That's what I was getting at, too. Also, what if citizenship is renounced? Say I was living and got married in Canada, and my wife ended up filing for divorce. If I was offered a job in Denmark, moved there and eventually renounced my Canadian citizenship to apply as a full citizen. Would I still have to pay alimony? I know, sounds crazy, but I lik…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 10:45 AM
6

Out of curiosity, would a pre-nup solve the alimony problem if no kids were involved? Or does that simply mean: she can't get anything I acquired outside of the marriage, but I still have to fork up the cash each month?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 07:23 PM
2

Not that I don't agree with you in most of these scenarios, I do, but wouldn't Lucy lose alimony for going out-of-country? Surely the government doesn't warrant the payment of alimony when you head outside of it's jurisdiction, no?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 07:17 PM
32

She desires a lifelong commitment with a good man...'s bank account Fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 07:15 PM
7

I remember when i was 12 and liked to make troll accounts....... And just look where that got you, Macbeth.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 07:06 PM
2

A soldier often smokes because it helps relieve tension during a tour of duty. Likewise, I and many other redditors on this subreddit use sarcasm as a way to help manage the often downtrodden news we hear about on this sub. We each have our way. And for those of us that currently aren't in a position to do much about it, verbal confirmation as a way of agreeing to how absurd the feminist movement has gotten the past decade or so is sometimes the best (and only way) we can establish our support f…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 10:22 PM
2

There are many important causes in this world. Are you aware of the alarming rate at which Rhino's are being poached in South Africa? Or what about the entire debacle revolving around Wikileaks persecution for spreading information that I would say the average citizen has full right to know about? But none of us here are superman. We all have to pick our battles, and to which causes we lend active support to. Because most of us have lives and responsibilities outside of our causes, and we need t…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:56 PM
-3

You can call it childish. That is your right. But for some of us, that biting sarcasm right there is a way to express our incredulity. Feminism is a backwards, anti-intellectual, fanatical and misandrist movement. And many of us find it completely and utterly absurd that anyone can honestly call their jaded beliefs anything other that flat out sexism. That is why we use sarcasm. You have the right to your opinion, but please respect that the top comment wouldn't be sarcastic if the better part o…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:45 AM
14

If defending myself from harm makes me a monster, then sign me up.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:33 AM
5

Honestly, I'd find it alien for a women I've never met in my life to suggest I step in and help her out of her own trouble. There's a saying me and my friends hold to. In Afrikaans, it goes "As jy dom is, moet jy afkak!". Literally translated, it means "If you're going to do something stupid, your going to get your ass handed to you". The Universe, if not mankind, has a moral imperative to punish blatant, intentional stupidity. And time and time again, it has, does and always will.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 12:30 PM
6

In Reddit currency, that's only one Karma point though... That's how they get you!
/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:40 PM
0

Out of curiosity, how then would you recommend fixing any gaps a person's parents may have left behind? Or is the boy/girl with only one parent permanently disadvantaged, in your opinion?
/r/MensRights04/04/13 01:39 AM
1

This put a smile on my face. Thank you.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:18 PM
3

My thanks. And yes, your edit was effective at proving your point. I'll keep your advice in mind.
/r/seduction01/02/13 11:10 PM
8

I've thought about pacing myself a bit more in conversations, but I was worried I'd come off as slow (in the head, if you catch my drift) or that people will simply decide then and there that I'm taking too long to respond to questions/ making statements. Any tips on how to break the fast talking habit?
/r/seduction01/02/13 10:27 PM
2

Pretty much, yes.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:59 PM
1

I never said we'd delete comments. I simply stated that we do have our own way of controlling what is considered inappropriate comments, within the definition I already stated. The difference, as you've stated and with which I agree, is that the feminists will delete comments that don't fit or challenges their misguided philosophy, which I consider on par with a little kid closing her ears and screaming "lalalala, I can't hear you". Sorry if there was a misunderstanding of sorts.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:57 PM
0

Technically, while we don't say it, we'd also downvote anti-intellectual comments from radical feminists to the point where it won't show up beyond the "comments below threshold" bar. note: I said "anti-intellectual" as in "this is simply some woman spewing hatred and nonsense regarding men and society instead of vying for an honest, open, unbiased debate/discussion of viewpoints".
/r/MensRights19/01/13 02:31 PM
1

There's a saying in Afrikaans: "Leė blikke maak die meeste geraas". The direct translation is "Empty cans make the most noise". Quite a fitting description of the vocal extremists, wouldn't you agree? As for not hating all feminists, it depends on your definition of the term "feminist". To me, a feminist is a misandrist who purposefully distorts reality and facts for the sake of portraying their gender as being the victims, in order gain more and more special treatment and advantages, whilst bla…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:12 PM
16

Has /r/mensrights made me hate women? No, just feminists. Has /r/mensrights made me aware of how the law is slanted against us men, and how women can, at any time, exploit this for their own purposes? Yes. Has that made me properly cautious/paranoid of engaging with women in a romantic or sexual sense and given me motivation to be distrustful of a woman's intentions until proven otherwise over the course of multiple years? Definitely. Not all women are feminists. But I believe the most important…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:06 PM
1

Mate, I've asked this question a few times before on /r/mensrights. You'll have to pardon me for asking again. Looking back over the last 10+ years you've been with this woman, was there any indication that she would turn out to be such a horrible, manipulative person? I'm sorry that things have turned out so bad. My thoughts are going with you and your kids.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:25 PM
5

Could be because men are more likely to do STEM fields which are known to be harder and have higher fail rates, so more women graduate, but with degrees that aren't as "valued" by employers. I find that this is the case on my campus. My engineering friends jokingly complain that by third year they have 80 guys competing for 6 women in class. On the Science side of campus it's mostly a 50/50 gender balance, with some variation in the specific fields. But once you arrive at the literacy, drama, vi…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:06 PM
8

I pensieri stretti ed il viso sciolto; Thoughts tight and face loose Or to put it simply: Keep a closed mind but an open face. You want your degree? Then play along with their little game up until you get it.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:47 PM
1

Read my edit above.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:02 AM
2

No hitting girls; they can hit you but you can't hit back. I can't agree to this. Physical violence is never the answer. That being said, I make it abundantly clear to all my female friends that I will hit them back if they think it is a good way to solve their frustrations. EDIT: Haha, okay, bit of a brain fart there. What I meant to say was that physical violence is only a viable route when used in self defense or the defense of others. I simply inform women that I don't tolerate being hit by …
/r/MensRights08/12/12 02:05 AM
0

I'm sorry, but the word feminism leaves a bad taste in my mouth. In an ideal world, we would all pool together as egaliterians against gender hatred on both sides of the line. But this isn't an ideal world. And I will be honest enough to say that with the real life stories I read here so often about certain groups of women deceiving men -- women who use to seem perfectly fair and reasonable at first-- and then using the feminist movement and the laws it has led to to get off unscathed while the …
/r/MensRights25/11/12 02:51 PM
1

I sincerely hope you've called your mother out on this. If she really cares about you, you should tell her to stop this nonsense. Because what she's doing right now is not just unfair towards your father, but in essence it shows that she's selfish enough to let her personal vendetta's ruin her children's lives. If she's basically aiming to put you on the street, at least give her a piece of your mind. I wish you the best of luck MrC. I hope everything will work out well for you.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 02:10 PM
-1

At the rate this is going, I wouldn't be surprised if the human race died out in the next 200 years because sex simply became too risky for a man to venture.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 01:03 AM
4

Is the sword an intentional choice to symbolize a great evil that must be "slain"? In both cases I believe the answer is a resounding "yes".
/r/MensRights19/11/12 03:27 PM
1

Moral of the story: When three random women in a bar suggest a foursome, walk away.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:31 PM
19

Are those holes were the breasts go? Oh, what am I saying! The title says 'rapist'. And women apparently can't do that.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:15 PM
5

If you do, make it a sword, will you? It's more manly looking than a sickle.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:12 PM
6

Calling them out is different than saying "This is wrong, stop it!" or "We don't associate with these extremists or their radical beliefs". If the 'level headed' feminists were really opposed to the radical movement you see today, they would've officially voiced it. No such thing as ever been done, as far as I know.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:57 AM
1

Yes, that's what I meant. Sorry for any confusion.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:46 AM
1

I have met one or two women who I can actually have an intelligent conversation and even debate with. Believe it or not, there are still some women of quality inbetween the refuse of society.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:43 AM
9

While I understand your reasoning (and I agree with it, for the most part), let's always keep in mind that /r/MensRights is an objective, mature, reasonable-minded and logical subreddit that promotes true gender equality. To resort to the petty tactics and name calling used by the Feminist movement, only lowers us to their level. I'm not saying you did resort to such tactics, only that we should all be mindful of how we convey our thoughts. However, to say that society has brainwashed the majori…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 01:31 AM
42

I always find myself wondering whether individuals like these honestly believe that talking about men's rights is hate speech, or whether they are fully aware that the whole feminist movement has turned into a misandrist movement and simply support it because of the often gender biased advantages (against men) that it affords them? In other words: are these modern day radical feminists brainwashed or merely opportunistic?
/r/MensRights17/11/12 08:17 PM
3

I realize it might be of little consolation, but thank you for that reply. A big worry of mine is that a woman would be able to fake being a perfectly wonderful person until after I married her, without even the smallest hints of who she really is seeping through the cracks beforehand to set off some warning alarms. I'm sure the unmarried redditors of this subreddit, mysef included, will take a lot more heed of those subtle little hints, having heard this. So thank you for that. You might just h…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 09:55 AM
2

I have to ask, looking back, was there ever any subtle signs that she would turn into the emotionally abusive woman she is (or already was at that point)? Or was there actually a time when she seemed perfectly normal?
/r/MensRights18/09/12 07:55 AM
1

I can't say I agree entirely with the "can't cope with other men part" as being relevant, mate. To the level where you can't hold a conversation with other men, sure. But it depends on the scenario. For me, the person I can have an intellectually stimulating conversation with and joke around with in equal parts, be it a man or a woman, is the one I am going to associate with. For me that generally means nerds of both genders. But I get the gist of what your saying: I guess some men are just desp…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:10 PM
2

I ask myself... how is it that a man could actually fall for a woman like this? Why would any man marry a woman who supports demonizing his whole gender?
/r/MensRights14/09/12 12:23 AM
2

Be pragmatic about it. What's more important, having an advantage against someone trying to attack you, or the opinions of your co-workers? Opinions aren't going to help your brother if he's being robbed. Tell him to keep that in mind.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 06:52 PM
8

Ah, the power of a logical, factual, well-backed article against feminism. Brings a smile to my face.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:37 AM
3

I'm a gamer, a fact of which I am proud. My dad was worried about sending my PC with me to university because he was convinced I was going to spend my whole day playing games and never studying. Two months into this little experiment, my grades have increased by 10% across the board (most subjects are now in the high 70's). Why?? Because when I have work to do, I do it. And when I have time to spare, I can now relax in a way that I like. It's my system. It works for me. As far as I'm concerned, …
/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter