TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CesiaCho Archive

View 0 posts and 140 comments by CesiaCho on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Holy shit, people are actually discussing this? That comment was satire - it was a play on the whole "we need to teach women to not be raped" thing, which suggests that they don't get drunk around men, don't hang around "that type" of guy, etc. Basically the satire went over your head, and apparently everyone else's. Remember, 80% of what you read on TBP is lightly making fun of TRP. Clearly it's not the fault of the falsely accused, just as being sexually assaulted is not the fault of the assau…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 12:57 AM
0

Oh god, the editing on this is so awful. Makes it look like they are all going to break up.
/r/RedPillWomen27/07/15 03:41 AM
1

wat
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 08:05 AM
1

what
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 05:12 AM
2

Okay. You're welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 11:26 PM
2

Hmm, the outrage junkie thing isn't too far off for me and many other subscribers at TBP. But as much as I like getting upset, it's also kind of exhausting and some of the real awful shit can really bring you down, so I've tried to stop seeking out the outrage. Which is why I've unsubscribed from this subreddit. But otherwise, your response was a silly. I barely comment here (or on/r/relationships) because it's incredibly futile. This place is probably the subreddit least conducive to good, heal…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 10:13 PM
2

you sure got me
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 04:13 PM
15

Why am I still subbed here? Discuss.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 06:00 PM
2

I'm assuming you were the one accused? How did it turn out? Do you still harbor bad feelings about the situation? Do you feel like your experience shaped some of the opinions you hold, or were they mostly formed from what you found when you researched your situation? You obviously don't have to answer any of these questions, I'm just insanely curious about it. Thanks in advance if you do :)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 04:40 PM
1

I agree with you, but I would also argue that often times a woman's emotions are responded to poorly. Any woman in a position of authority who cries or shows sadness is automatically seen as weak, while any woman in a position of authority who shows anger or arrogance is a bitch, a ball breaker (or, y'know, PMSing apparently). I think we all need to be accepting of varying emotions - they aren't evil, and showing that you feel shouldn't be a bad thing. Ultimately, our emotions are really all tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 01:23 PM
4

What? This isn't even a study. It's a graduate student's thesis. We can learn absolutely nothing from this, sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/15 08:04 AM
4

Ah yes, because one can just will herself to be a lesbian. And that's definitely something you'd want to do in Russia. Sorry, he's not an RP god, he's just your general asshole. Also what a great account. Can't wait to hear more from you, trolling or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/15 06:06 AM
1

Wow, excellent counter-point, I surrender.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/15 03:03 AM
5

Did you even read the study? It has nothing to do with "athletic fitness" and instead has to do with the proliferation of mostly harmful genetic defects. For example: Compared with Caucasians, AfA have a higher mortality rate for all cancers combined and for most major cancers (Jemal et al. 2006), as well as a higher risk of obesity-related diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and prostate cancer (Goran 2008). And sure, being resistant to Malaria is pretty cool, but it doesn't make you a sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 09:26 PM
7

Where the fuck do you get your information? Stormfront? Any differences between African people and European people in certain sports is from hundreds of thousands of years of evolution, not a couple hundred years of Africans enslaved in America. Do some fucking research next time instead of listening to Uncle Jed rant about how he didn't get that football scholarship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 08:45 PM
4

1-10: nah
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 09:06 AM
2

Do people really take this image made by a teenager as truth? Amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 08:52 PM
2

k
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 05:44 AM
4

It is a truism that 20% of men have 80% of the sex in any group, and it is probably much worse than that among young people. What an absurd statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 05:03 AM
3

Balpha Fubs.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 05:01 AM
14

The victim-blaming in the comments made me rage. Some of them are acting like he's an idiot for not getting a vasectomy and like it's his fault. That really got to me too - I couldn't believe people were actually saying that. If the husband had lied about a vasectomy and the wife didn't use any other forms of birth control the response would be totally different with someone people even alleging rape. But now that it's the husband who chose to trust his wife, he's apparently an idiot for not pro…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 03:44 PM
21

Ah yes, India, the Bastion of Feminism.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 10:22 AM
1

Sorry, I was in a rush, but here is a source explaining increased longevity. In fact, for some people, their life expectancy is higher than that of the average US citizen. I'm not saying HIV/AIDS isn't a big deal. You still have to take a lot of medication and you have to be careful, etc, but it's not the death sentence it used to be. Also, just to be clear, I don't have HIV ~
/r/MensRights19/12/14 11:36 PM
2

Really? Do you really think her squashing her tits together is what saved her from getting charged with attempted murder?
/r/MensRights19/12/14 04:18 PM
2

This talks about a case from 1996 and I'm sure it could still be argued for today. If treated early, people with HIV can live just as long as someone without.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 04:17 PM
3

You do realize that it was the defense lawyer who came up with that theory, right? Not the perpetrator. There are a lot of borderline insane defenses, especially when there isn't a lot of hope for the defendant. Flipping the situation around happens a lot in sexual assault cases, ie claiming that the victim is promiscuous, the victim is the one who came onto the defendant, the victim plied the defendant with alcohol, etc.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 04:14 PM
2

Yeah, sorry, mostly I just didn't believe you because false allegations about false allegations are a SERIOUS problem. But now that I have solid evidence that you're a totally awesome person, I guess I have no choice but to believe you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 10:58 PM
0

I feel like you're doing something wrong if you've been accused of rape three times already.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 12:43 PM
10

You're like so close to not being an obvious troll. Maybe take it back like half a step and you're golden.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/14 05:49 AM
1

Hahah. There are quite a few in my city and I've looked at their websites with mild interest but I don't think I could ever bring myself to go to one. If you pay my way we can pretend we're a couple so you can get in and bang some women and I'll sit in the corner and drink and watch the weird shit going on around me.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 04:00 AM
1

I didn't say that, but okay.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 03:58 AM
1

I don't disagree with you. I was just explaining why that situation occurred, but yes you are absolutely right in your assessment. I just heard a story on NPR (or maybe I read it? I really can't remember) about clubs that hire models and attractive young women to show up at their venue. Why? Because it attracts wealthy men, usually older, who know that there will be attractive women who are willing to play a certain part for them. They are just a hair away from being escorts on business trips, y…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 07:37 PM
1

I took it as we assume that autistic people are better at mathy subjects. "Autistic" isn't necessarily an insult these days.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:52 AM
32

To be fair, I'm pretty sure that doesn't stem from "women are disenfranchised and need free things!" It's because a lot of bars and club really want a higher female to male ratio than what would naturally occur. The best example of this in practice is at sex clubs ( or bathhouses, etc) that will only allow a limited number of single men on a given night or charge extra for single men, otherwise it'd be 99% penises and no one really wants that. Unless it's a gay bathhouse, they probably want that…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:46 AM
1

Excellent response, thanks for your input.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:20 PM
-1

I don't mind strangers trying to have a friendly chat with me, but I do mind someone getting my attention in an aggressive way just to tell me I look good. I don't need that validation. Most women don't see your compliments as nice or validating. Furthemore, it's just odd that you believe you have the right to comment on a complete stranger's physical appearance. What are you trying to accomplish by doing that? Has it ever worked? I'm not saying you're harassing anyone or that you're a bad guy (…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:15 PM
0

I'm astounded by the response here. The fact that people are actually arguing for the right to harass strangers on the street is pretty ridiculous. Just when I start to like this subreddit, bitter men come in and ruin it solely because they are anti-anything-female. Just because something is showcasing a particularly female problem doesn't mean it's anti-male. I'm happy for you that you feel the enjoyment you derive from being a complete jerk to strangers is worth whatever strife it causes them.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:03 PM
5

I really don't understand why it's unpopular to think it's uncool to yell things at strangers. I never said I thought they should be arrested, just that it's not okay and I wish there was more social backlash for this kind of behavior.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:22 AM
-10

I believe that it does. Someone yelling lewd things at you is invading your personal space. I don't think it's unreasonable to not want strangers harassing you or taking creep shots of you. I hope you're not actually advocating for the bad guys here.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:14 AM
-10

You really don't think its harassment to say lewd things to a stranger? And even if you want to argue that it's only harassment if it continues after requesting it to cease (as if the onus is on the person minding their own business), when you respond to a catcaller they will usually respond more aggressively. Both of these things are gross and invasions of personal space and privacy. I don't know why it needs to turn into an us vs them argument.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 06:50 AM
9

nearly 10 times the number of male victims as opposed to women victims. That's made-to-penetrate victims, not all sexual assault victims.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 08:39 PM
0

Your logic makes no sense, sorry. Also, she is more likely to die in prison than outside and has an increased risk of mortality soon after leaving prison. I will agree that it heavily prevents her from attempting it again, so that is good.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 03:09 AM
3

It's probably also because she is older and small in stature and is a "world-renowned" breast cancer doctor. I'm sure they also tried to get the jury to sympathize with her because he spurned her, etc. Could also have to do with her demeanor. She is clearly very intelligent and doesn't exactly seem like someone capable of murder. I really don't think that statement is entirely due to her being a woman. There are plenty of women that are sent to jail who don't garner any sympathy. I don't feel ba…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:23 PM
1

Oh my God, this might be the first time in the history of the internet that someone said that non-sarcastically. Thanks for reading it. Also, I'm not really an MRA. I find myself shaking my head at 90% of the content here but I do know that there are certain struggles that men face and I care about those things.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 06:49 PM
1

Thanks for your response. The whole kidnapping thing is a whole nother boat of fucked up lol so I'm not even gonna address that. It's pretty terrible though. And yeah, these regulations are all by state laws. I will offer some explanations for why all of those are inherently bad for the patient. Many young girls who become pregnant are terrified to tell their parents, and even more will face fairly dire consequences if their parents find out. These factors can lead to the young woman obscuring h…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 04:33 PM
2

For one thing, does the father of the child have a say in what happens? What if the father of the child wants to raise it, are his rights as a parent dismissed because a woman's rights supersedes his? Yes? You can't force someone to carry out a pregnancy just like you can't force someone to have a procedure performed. It might not sound fair for the other party, but it's just an unfortunately unfair biological situation that we can't really change. Furthermore, there are many laws in the US rest…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:45 PM
1

We need the men folk I prefer folksy men, personally.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:15 AM
5

Are you really blaming the suicidal person for committing suicide? That is a pretty terrible opinion to have. Seeking help for your mental health issues can be difficult for many people, especially those who are suffering greatly from depression and/or suicidal thoughts, and especially for men because there is often a stigma attached to receiving counseling. It's not like a person who attempts suicide decides to do so with a clear, rational, healthy mind, all while saying "fuck you, therapists, …
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:12 AM
1

Western Journalism is egregiously biased and not even remotely a reputable source. Also, this article is terribly written and provides absolutely no reliable research other than the writer's anecdotal exaggerations. I wouldn't link to them again if you want to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:10 AM
1

I have no doubt that it was his implication, but he can't prove it.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 02:51 AM
56

Yeah, I don't really see this as a men's issue, it's just an issue of shitty parents. Happens all the time.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:25 PM
2

thanks hearing_bot. still wut, tho.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:30 PM
-2

You are downplaying it based on the small number of people who die from abuse. I don't really think that number changes how awful or not awful DV is.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:17 PM
0

what
/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:11 PM
1

How is this related to MR? Are we supposed to be outraged that he got 14 years?
/r/MensRights03/02/14 10:28 AM
7

Just because the majority of people don't die from domestic violence they endure doesn't mean it should be ignored.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 10:27 AM
10

Yes, you definitely do. because in her twisted way she thought it'd somehow help if she beat me into 'understanding' her viewpoint. Of course she thought she was helping. She was/is clearly mentally unstable and it doesn't matter if she THOUGHT what she was doing was right, it was wrong and hurt you and is still hurting you. Her own delusions should not stop you from doing what is right. That just means she still has some control over you, and she will probably do this to her next partner. No on…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 04:21 AM
2

You're fucking joking, right? This person is just trash. Her gender has nothing to do with it. People like you ruin this subreddit.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 12:52 PM
0

Really?
/r/MensRights22/12/13 12:47 PM
5

I'm sorry, but where does it say anywhere that "he had an erection so it wasn't rape"? Why is this claim in the title AND in the post? I'm not seeing that phrase or a similar one anywhere in the articles, so why are we putting words in the court's mouth? I'm not saying this isn't awful and she is a horrible person and deserved a heavier sentence, but why make shit up? We don't have enough details (and no one here seems to be an expert on Australian law) of the trial to claim this. It ruins the c…
/r/MensRights22/12/13 12:34 PM
-2

How is that a whoosh? I simplified what he said.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:20 AM
4

men are far more likely to take on risky roles to earn the money needed to appeal to women whose value is innate by nature or implied culturally You cannot be serious with that sentence. Men going to jail is now the fault of women, because we are all gold diggers. Got it.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:56 AM
-7

Probably because this subreddit is 80% white males who get upset over being told they are privileged.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:53 AM
-2

Yeah, not what I was saying at all. Just saying, stop jumping to conclusions. I was merely offering an alternate history as opposed to "women are horrible liars who want to ruin men's lives."
/r/MensRights25/10/13 12:41 AM
1

Oh, yes, sorry, I was just saying why I'm not worried about it. You are entirely correct though. I am still subscribed to the subreddit and everyday there are posts I just cannot agree with, or I think are too extreme. Of course, I also feel that every day with this subreddit.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 05:54 PM
-10

Really? Please tell me you aren't that gullible. What if he had been stalking her for months? What if he had threatened her with physical violence before? She said that she feared for her safety. That's generally not something that a person will say after having no contact with a person. Of course, these are all assumptions on my part. They may not have all of the information or are not allowed to disclose it all, so please don't automatically assume that a (very short) news article contains all…
/r/MensRights24/10/13 05:50 PM
1

Eh, it's one mod who thought what I said was out of line. And that subreddit is not the face of feminism as a whole.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 05:38 PM
-8

I can't believe the comments here. This is a very, very short synopsis of an incident that we know nothing else about. We don't know anything about these two people or any further details about the incident or events leading up to it. There is no point is jumping to conclusions and getting angry about it. Let's be a little bit rational, please.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 04:21 PM
3

Also got banned for a silly reason. I used to like that subreddit. I still sort of do and every so often I forget that I'm banned and try to comment and get sad :( All well. I was a feminist first and always will be one, but that subreddit is shit half the time.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 09:08 PM
0

Yeah...still nope.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:24 PM
1

Absolutely. I agree with the sentiment, I just don't think that "fucked" is the right word.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 10:55 PM
1

Ah, I see what you were saying now. Nonetheless, fucked is the wrong word to use.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 10:50 PM
1

I'm not sure if "getting fucked" and "getting raped" is really the same. Let's be real here, also semantics and shit. I, and most people, view "getting fucked" as either a good thing because you got laid, or a bad thing because you were wronged in some way. It doesn't really seem to pertain to being forcibly penetrated.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 07:15 AM
0

Oh, I was just saying it wasn't as heavily biased as some people are saying and actually displayed some of the problems with both movements and how silly the warfare between the two is. Obviously it was subjective but at the same time, it's VICE. And it probably showed a more reasonable and fair outlook than a lot of other equally non-credible sources.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 07:11 AM
9

Uhh, what? She names some successful, powerful women, and then somehow thinks this proves that "men dither." And the fact that some of the USA's male politicians were not smiling in press photos while one female politician was proves ANYTHING at all? Is this for real? Was this seriously posted on CNN's website? I'm so confused right now. Not only is this article full of blatant misandry, it's not even well written OR factual.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:57 PM
3

How about just "raped" instead of "fucked" though? Seems like the wrong word to use.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:38 PM
2

I lost any interest in giving respect to this post after seeing that it was a poorly constructed website rant with some random stories pulled and her subjective ideas interspersed, but I REALLY lost it when she wrote this: You liked him. You found him attractive. You got drunk. You went with him willingly. You fucked him. It didn’t end with chocolates and rainbows and a diamond ring. The story she posted and linked to above this comment mentioned very few details of the night, and then she comes…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:35 PM
5

It seems more and more women are calling rape simply because they regret their decisions Exactly - it "seems" that way. You can't just decide that it is a common problem, or more common than actual rape just because you are reading about it more. Please don't align yourself with someone like her.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:28 PM
3

To be fair, he heavily criticized the feminists that were at the counter-protest. Honestly, he is right. It probably was all very stupid and left both groups "more firmly entrenched in their polarized ideological camps." Reading about this depressed me because some of us just want equal rights for everyone and don't really care to align ourselves with one "movement" especially when it is heavily associated with just one gender. And both groups honestly probably want the same thing in the long ru…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:24 PM
4

I didn't get that feeling at all. Most attendees seemed motivated by a concern for the well-being of men, or a fear of women rooted in their own personal traumas. A surprising number of men at the rally came forward as victims of domestic violence. These men felt stung by misandry—they talked reasonably about the weakness of men’s support networks and the lack of sympathy that they experienced following abuse. Almost everyone at the rally expressed concern for things like the high suicide rate a…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 11:17 PM
47

Thank you. I don't see how he can make a title like that and not even provide a comparable story from a reliable source.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 01:15 PM
1

Oookay.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 10:25 AM
-1

Yes, but I decided to take it as a joke and had a bit of a laugh. Obviously this is generalizing, but there are some feminists who totally follow this flow chart so it has some good points, but I would say that most of us rational feminists see a lot of flaws with this chart.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 01:01 AM
8

Thank you for your response. I slowly started cringing while reading this post then went into full on face-palm mode by the end and I was worried that all of the comments would agree, as they often do here. She is attempting to pit genders against each other and claim one as the victor in a weird attempt to show that she is "one of us." Not cool at all. Men and women are both capable of evil and good in their own nuanced ways. And opening a door for someone is just something a nice person does, …
/r/MensRights20/09/13 06:14 PM
1

:(
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:39 PM
2

Doesn't change the downvotes! Ahhhhh
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:37 PM
2

Calling out lying, vapid worthless cunts like Anita is Men's Rights. I highly doubt that most of us would want that to be the tag line for /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:59 AM
-4

Nope. I know she said that sentence, I'm just saying you need to take in the context. I think it was more of a "you don't have to be a fan to make a vid, because it's not a fanboy type of thing" etc. And again, it seems to be about specifically violent, first person, male-centric video games. I'm just saying, this hardly refutes anything and it should not be posted to Men's Rights. It's posts like this that degrade this subreddit.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:58 AM
-1

Oh, yeah, sorry. I meant "you" as in the OP. I guess it wasn't the right comment to comment on, but you linked the videos I watched.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:39 AM
-6

So, I just watched that, and I think she was just explaining the difference between making a fan video and "vidding" without necessarily showing the context in a positive light. That is why she showed a video she made with violent video games with male protagonists, and then said she is not a fan (presumably of "those types of games"). I'm just saying, you are really reaching here and I don't think your video proved anything. Your clip was taken from a relatively informal lecture and then you sp…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 12:50 AM
5

Again, this seems to be an ad about prostitution. Lots of young girls are forced or manipulated into prostitution, so I think they really did mean "girls." I had the same thought that you did, but who knows what the rest of the poster says since the OP conveniently left that out.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 03:31 AM
2

Yeah, it would be nice if they actually had a picture of the entire poster. This appears to be an ad about prostitution, not rape. Of course, many prostitutes are forced or heavily manipulated into it, so that is the point of the ad.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 03:30 AM
-1

Your entire last two paragraphs were unnecessary - I agree with all of that. I'm simply saying that the constant comparison and the eventual "female genital mutilation isn't even that big of a deal" arguments are tired and do not help the cause.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:58 AM
0

If you've ever touched the exposed glans clitoris, you'll know what I'm talking about. Your female partner will squirm or flinch because the sensation is that intense. As a female who knows other females, this is not necessarily true. I do not squirm or flinch or jump from this sensation when applied by myself. Of course, if another person, especially someone I am not familiar with, did this, then yes, I would have an almost involuntary reaction. From my experience, it is the same with a male. T…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:50 AM
3

I wouldn't say that the brain adapts. More like, that adult's only sexual stimulation came from a circumcised penis. It's not necessarily "adapting", it's just the way that it always was to that individual.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:46 AM
2

I've read this before and everyone should. It's a good read. Basically, the conclusion is that it is inconclusive, but that it's pretty much a bad/useless thing to do. But I think the better point is that there is NO REASON to compare FGM to MGM. Is this some sort of contest? Which is worse? Or, as it often comes off, "well if you are going to circumcise our boys, then FGM is okay!" Any sort of genital mutilation done against the person's will is terribly wrong and it should stop.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:43 AM
3

Haha, nope you did not come off as condescending at all. Thanks, you have a good night, too.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 07:06 AM
2

You're absolutely right. I did not intend to attempt to justify their actions. Obviously murder is reprehensible, even if that person committed horrible crimes him/herself. I also should not have said that we can assume that he raped her. It's just that rape is common in that area and the police seemed to have reasonable evidence. I guess I just hoped that people would recognize that setting someone on fire is wrong and terrible, regardless of what the victim did to "deserve it." And you are rig…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 06:33 AM
-6

Sweden is the rape capital of Europe. I don't know if this is relevant, but it seems like the right thing to respond with.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:58 AM
-11

They have to say "alleged" in the article no matter the crime if the person has not actually been found guilty in a criminal court. We can assume that he most likely did rape her (considering he had been arrested and jailed for an month on these charges), they just can't say he definitely did without the possibility of repercussions. Mostly semantics, kind of like the title for this thread is "woman claims man raped her..."
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:31 AM
33

Setting them on fire isn't really that violent. I mean, all those kids are naturally born flammable and they choose to wear cotton/polyester blends that are highly flammable, so deep down, they will probably like it.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:43 AM
1

Right, but generally there is a legitimate reason for being socially outcasted by your peers, especially as an adult. Again, not saying it's that person's fault or their peers aren't dicks, it's just that you can do things to either fit in with more types of people, or seek out more members of your particular herd.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:13 AM
3

What I'm skeptical of is the common view that if someone is incel, it must be his or her fault somehow. I did not mean to insinuate that, sorry if it came off that way! Thanks for your reply. You lend an interesting perspective.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 02:55 AM
3

I was skeptical while reading this whole thing, but I do support your idea of legalized prostitution. If this is really such a problem affecting our society, then that seems like a reasonable part of the solution. Also, professional escorts generally do offer services other than sex that would help curb loneliness. Some points of objection: Your wording that there are double the number of adult male virgins than adult female virgins is mildly misleading. Reading the article you linked, the femal…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 01:21 AM
0

As far as the "evidence" bit goes, it sounds like we agree. They were unable to conclusively prove anything. And all of the WHO points are correct. Those are mostly cultural/religious reasons for FGM. Doesn't mean they are legitimate excuses for it. I think that we can both agree that it is a human right's violation and just WRONG to mutilate another person's genitalia, even if it is your own infant's. I was just confused as to why you were posting those random, cherrypicked sentences from the p…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 06:52 AM
1

Okay, so the "in conclusion" sentence meant that they have not yet gathered the evidence to claim anything. And then they listed ways in which to further study this. I also love how your ellipses replaced this part: "This evidence, and the fact that it is done without the consent of the girl and without clear health benefits or religious mandate is enough to ix classify this act as a violation of human rights, specifically children’s rights and women’s sexual and reproductive rights. The practic…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 12:11 PM
0

Thank you for articulating what I was too stunned to say. Attributing characteristics to an entire gender is silly, especially since we know that gender is not as rigid as we once thought. I'm sorry that giegerwasright has had some bad experiences with women, but saying what he said is not only stupid and false, but dangerous.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:52 AM
3

I tried so hard to come up with a competent counterpoint, but your concluding argument was so absurd that "wat" was the only reasonable response.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:22 AM
4

Empathy. It's just not something women are taught to have. Nor is perspective. wat
/r/MensRights21/08/13 07:10 AM
2

It frustrates me to see comments like this, even though you are not wrong. I hate the war going on between either gender right's activists. It diminishes the overall goal, which is for no one to ever be treated differently, socially, legally, educationally, etc, based upon their given or chosen gender.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:43 AM
5

You bring up good points, but I think it's still important to look at the more nuanced ways that we divide ourselves based on gender. Sure, this t-shirt is relatively unimportant compared to institutionalized and/or legal discrimination based on gender, but it still shows us how far we have to go when it comes to people thinking that sexist jokes are funny. Also, it's a disgusting t-shirt and the situation that it implies is depressing. Why would anyone want to be in a relationship like that, an…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:50 AM
1

Exactly. That is really all I wanted to say. Sometimes our saving our own asses is less important than saving the life of another person.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 04:17 AM
2

Yeah, sorry, I worded that all wrong. All I meant is that in addition to just being a decent human being, the added bonus would be that there would be a headline titled, "Man saves lost girl from drowning" as opposed to the old "Man found with 8 terabytes of child porn." It's the same as being afraid to assist an accident victim due to the possibility of being sued in civil court. Anyone who hesitates to assist a person who is in immediate danger (barring a situation where assisting would put yo…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 04:15 AM
1

Highly doubtful that helping a child find his parents in a store would lead to an actual criminal court.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 04:04 AM
-31

It is probably more sad that you were more concerned with maybe having a misunderstanding than helping a child. Yeah, that sucks that it's a possibility, but isn't saving a child's life more important than initially being accused of being a child abductor? If more men would just do it and prove, hey I'm NOT a pedophile, then it would become more normal. Instead of just complaining about it and not doing anything? edit: I would like to retract my last point; not really sure what I was trying to s…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 10:03 AM
1

Never said they were sexually abused. Just suffered some sort of trauma. Also, it's not for sure, just saying it's likely. It's not just the motive that makes them different, it's the nature of the crime and also the response of the perpetrators during the trial. One of those boys was almost definitely a pyschopath and both were proven to be dangers to society. I'm not advocating for any child to be punished like an adult (mostly because it will only serve to further emotionally damage the child…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:45 PM
1

Certainly, but these are vastly different cases, and we don't know very many details yet from the case posted here. Also, I just want to state that I don't think this should be brushed off. Not in the least.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:57 AM
1

Not necessarily true. Any time a child, no matter the gender, presents overt sexualization, I think most people assume it's a byproduct of some sort of trauma. I think the majority of people would assume that a ten-year-old, prepubescent boy who raped a four-year-old had some sort of serious trauma. Hell, anyone, no matter age or gender, who sexually assaults people probably has incurred some sort of trauma or has a mental disorder. What do you expect people to say in a similar situation? Wow, t…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 02:43 AM
-2

No shit. 75% of ShitLordXurious' title covered 1/10th of the article. And besides, this is the Daily Mail. No one should ever link directly to the Daily Mail unless they secretly want people to disbelieve the point they are trying to prove. This article hardly dips its toes into what it is trying to research.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:11 PM
0

What the hell? No? If you had actually kept the original wording and not changed the problem from height to skin color, then maybe we could have a discussion about it. Thank god I know this will be downvoted and not be given a serious thought.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:52 PM
0

No, because you said that women don't respect and value men and insinuated that women desire to get pregnant and then cut out the father from their child's life.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 05:03 AM
0

I feel like you are making "women" as a whole the enemy. As if women are trying to get pregnant and then ruin the father's life, as if that is any (and many) woman's goal. I think that is a fundamentally flawed (and just plain fucked up) view to have. I don't think most single mothers set out to meet men, have a relationship, get pregnant, and then decide to villainize that man and take full custody, although it may appear that way sometimes. Just as it might appear that many men set out to impr…
/r/MensRights02/06/13 04:39 AM
0

Not trying to be rude, but I don't know what point you are trying to make. I was agreeing with you.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 05:26 PM
0

Do you have anything to back up your claim that these young, uneducated mothers desire these babies outside of a committed relationship? I feel like you are on the edge of insinuating that they dupe men into impregnating them all the time. Also, I definitely agree that men need more birth control options other than just condoms.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 04:26 AM
0

I agree that this probably isn't something to be celebrated simply due to the fact that these numbers mostly come from an increasing number of single, never-wed mothers. Unfortunately, most media outlets are just repeating the headline and acting like it's cause for celebration. I'm not saying that single-parent households are incapable of raising children properly, but the fact that they are living off of 23k/yr in wages definitely shows that it's not always the best environment for a child. Es…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 09:37 PM
1

It wasn't when I commented on it. I was making a joke anyways and fully expected it to get downvoted, especially paired with my comment.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:57 AM
-7

His point was clear. You're the one trying to make it vague to make me look like the bad guy.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:16 AM
-4

Having a psychological issue is not nefarious. It's not normal to fear an entire gender. And it is pretty obvious the point you were trying to make. Are you not heterosexual?
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:11 AM
-5

You don't have sex with men because you aren't attracted to them, not because you have a serious distrust of men or some sort of psychological issue causing you to hate men. Bad analogy, sorry. His comment was very clear and very disturbing (assuming he actually feels that way).
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:29 AM
0

I didn't bring up rape out of the blue, nor was I comparing it to anything. There were cases posted in there where men were raped. And it was related because we were discussing custody issues in which one party was wronged. I wasn't chastising you for bringing up rape - I was chastising you for presenting a situation in which the facts were absolutely clear and comparing it to a vague postsecret postcard. And for comparing being raped to being the victim of financial fraud. It sucks, because you…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:26 AM
1

AnthonyZarat said he shouldn't have sex with a person because that person is a woman. If a person is that distrustful or scared of half the population, something bad probably happened to them and I would urge them to seek psychiatric help.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:22 AM
-4

...really? Can you reread his comment and come back, thanks.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:14 AM
0

I don't understand why you're going through my previous comments and posting them on other comments, but okay. If you want to make a point, feel free to explain yourself rather than acting like a pre-teen and calling me names.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:12 AM
-2

Okay, so then men who have never been to war cannot use the word "war" as a metaphor.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:31 AM
-19

Did you really just compare that to rape? Supporting a child that you think is yours is not even remotely comparable to being raped. Besides, the situation you picked is pretty fucking cut and dry. All we know is that the child isn't his. There is a multitude of possibilities for why - she could have even been raped.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:27 AM
4

And this is why I assume most of the posters in MensRight are bitter woman-haters. Way to shine a bad light on your community.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:23 AM
-1

Not that I'm saying rape is contraceptive fraud, but this is similar. Men who have impregnated a woman through raping her are legally allowed visitation and custody in many states. That's so incredibly fucked up, but I know people (like this author) are fighting against it. I'm not saying contraceptive fraud isn't messed up, but I'd rather spend 18 years paying child support than 18 years having to deal with my rapist and letting him take care of my child.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:21 AM
1

Oh wow, yeah, that seems like really good evidence. Thanks.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:40 AM
10

Yes, I totally agree with you; the best way to show love for your child is to spend time with them, instead of handing them off to a nanny when it's not necessary (not trying to make working mothers feel guilty). You would be surprised at how many people with a "high enough income" hire nannies to practically raise their children.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 07:42 PM
18

Yes. Having a child is a massive responsibility (or burden, depending on how you look at it.) If you have to work to support your child, then you damn well better. It's not easy, but if you are expecting anything CLOSE to easy when deciding to have children, you are unfortunately unprepared and naive.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 07:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter