TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Chad_McChadface Archive

View 0 posts and 115 comments by Chad_McChadface on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

bro that’s what’s wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 03:33 PM
6

Oh, so just a pointless comment, cool thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 04:28 PM
7

Nah dude, I just don’t think people understand whatever it is you’re trying to say in your comments. Like I don’t know what point you’re trying to make
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 05:02 PM
1

This is an incredibly pure example of confirmation bias. You seem to have nothing going on for you except your height. Do you really think you’d be doing better with women if you didn’t even have that? There’s just more average height guys out there and plenty of women for whom those men are tall enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 07:57 PM
2

This is all so stupid. It’s not the sort of “gotcha” moment you seem to think it is. Somebody who denies being exceptionally broke/ugly is in no way claiming to be wealthy and handsome. This is logic that even children should understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 07:44 PM
2

This is not the same thing as cheating while drunk.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 11:21 PM
2

Right, and if he gets that sense, then he is able to wish her well and end the conversation. Maybe she seemed receptive and already smiled back, etc. Remember this hypothetical man is attractive and has good social skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 01:50 PM
1

Why would a man who is attractive, socially astute and confident in himself, not just talk to and ask out a woman he is interested in?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 01:45 PM
-2

Jesus Christ you really think the presidency is that easy to win?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 02:27 PM
4

And I don’t hear men catcalling or harassing women on the street. Does that mean it doesn’t happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 05:00 PM
5

Why do you think average people can’t have interesting conversation about those topics? Or at least, why do you think your insights about them are any more correct/valuable than an average person’s?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 06:57 PM
1

Okay, but what’s the point? Wanting to have sex with other men isn’t a switch that straight men desiring sex can just switch on
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 05:16 PM
4

Alright, well in that case if you want to use your own definition, I guess I can’t stop you. But at some point you need to realize nobody else defines it that way and productive conversation is next to impossible if you insist on using your own definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 07:41 PM
7

By your definition, is any relationship with financial inequality sugaring?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:11 PM
1

This whole post just reads like you trying to rationalize why it’s better to be less successful with women. It isn’t the end all be all, but who doesn’t want a healthy and fulfilling sex life on top of everything else going on with their life?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 02:17 AM
7

I’m what world is 500 million not ‘generational wealth’? I just looked up the stats and approximately only 4,500 people globally have a net worth at or above 500m. Nobody loses 500 million because they didn’t marry someone else that rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 01:47 AM
1

It doesn’t feel extremely insecure to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 12:17 AM
1

Feel free to believe that and never try to become any better, but don’t be mad at the people outperforming you who are willing to put in effort
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 10:48 PM
3

There are lots of professional athletes that have been busted for rape too. They’re still generally viewed through a positive lens, so it must be something else
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 03:59 PM
1

But can’t you say all the same things for the second case? Life at 45 is a completely different world than life at 20 too
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 10:35 PM
1

3 years makes a big difference at those ages, yes, but adding one more year to the equation doesn’t magically make the older person a pedophile. That dilutes how fucked up real pedophillia actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 10:16 PM
5

Fight club Brad Pitt >>> powerlifters for practically all but a very small subset of women
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 05:11 PM
12

That’s not really skinny fat though. Skinny fat is low lean muscle with a relatively high BF% resulting in looking chubby at a ‘healthy’ weight. Low BF and low lean muscle is just skinny / gaunt / weak
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 05:09 PM
3

You sound like you also struggle to maintain relationships and friendships IRL. Do you have any friends? If so, maybe consider that the way people act online isn’t always indicative of how they are in person
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 12:45 AM
2

Just someone who tried to apply critical thinking
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 01:27 PM
5

Difficulty reading body language / gauging her emotional response. The desire to have a go to rule to follow that works in every situation and doesn’t require nuance
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 01:17 PM
4

Are you seriously not able to grasp the concept of a comparison? Not everything being compared needs to be 100% the same. She clearly laid out to you the point of the comparison and why it is useful. Either you are just arguing in bad faith and intentionally missing the point, or you don’t have the capacity to grasp it. Neither are a good look.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 06:21 PM
2

Just saying “nah, that doesn’t happen much” isn’t addressing it, that’s avoiding it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 08:56 PM
2

I mean sure, have fun raising an infant alone, and then only seeing your own child every other week. Feels like an empty threat that sounds much better on a keyboard than irl
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 05:07 AM
12

Genuinely asking, what makes asking a woman her weight a micro aggression, but not asking a man what his height is?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 10:00 PM
3

Maybe it’s personal if you ask out a friend and get rejected, but if you get rejected on a cold approach, I’m not sure how you could take it personally. They don’t know you and you don’t know them. They might not be straight, they might be in a relationship, or just got out of an abusive one.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 07:35 PM
4

Yeah, that’s why they get hate, because some of them are assholes!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 10:32 PM
18

That isn’t a fact, just your opinion
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 07:56 PM
1

If you keep saying it, it makes it true
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 11:41 PM
1

Meh, the women who have approached me are generally less attractive than the women that I would approach. Which is... fine I guess, but if I know I could do better, then I’d have a hard time deciding to settle for one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 03:18 PM
5

Then get money and a six pack and stop complaining
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 05:44 PM
5

It isn’t a research paper, it isn’t meant to be a definitive source. It’s a great explanation and example though, and I assume that’s why it was linked
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 05:04 PM
13

Anyone dumb enough to believe any of this, absolutely deserve to self select themself out of the gene pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 11:39 PM
7

For what it’s worth, I think holding out and not settling is still the correct call.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 10:39 PM
18

I mean... you realize that your problem was that all those women you found sufficiently attractive just didn’t find you to be sufficiently attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 10:29 PM
2

Right? I have no idea how they can type that with a straight face
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/21 01:00 AM
5

Is melancholy really the right emotion to describe literally any of these circumstances?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 03:51 AM
2

I generally agree with you, but I don’t want to date a broke dumb bitch. That said, I’d rather date someone broke, dumb and hot than someone rich, smart and ugly, so maybe I don’t actually know where I stand ¯\(ツ)/¯ eh why bother settling for either
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 03:47 AM
2

I mean, I’ve been never been married, but damn do women seem to come on to me when I’m unavailable and in a relationship. (not at all an endorsement of OP, lol just no)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 03:39 AM
3

Meh, I have options. I choose to pursue the less entitled ones. Sometimes I’ll pay, but if her bio says anything about feminism / gender roles / down with the patriarchy and she doesn’t offer to split the bill, she won’t progress past casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 03:36 AM

A short man with a great face, body, personality and job will nearly always outperform a tall, ugly, fat, weird, poor recluse of a man. But all other factors equal, a tall man has an advantage over short men and there’s nothing that the shorter men can do about it. A man who is short with a below average face will need to work much harder to reach the baseline to be considered attractive. And even once he puts the work in, he looks around and sees men putting in way less work, but getting better…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 06:54 PM
15

Deciding to make a change in your own style or appearance is not the same thing as rejecting somebody over something superficial about their appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 06:28 PM
6

And he could also get struck by lightning, either way it’s completely unrelated to his behavior and how he treated her
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 04:34 PM
8

I don’t think he’s as terrible as some people might try to paint him, but I’m not a fan of his content. He seems more interested in being entertaining and putting entitled women in their place, than actually helping people adjust expectations / find happiness. I mean, I get it. It’s a show and if it isn’t entertaining people don’t care. I’d be interested to see how he handled entitled loser men, but at least his newer content seems to focus on women. Again, I get that he’s appealing to his large…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/21 03:32 PM
6

An 8.5 woman is as attractive as a 10 man A 5.5 woman is as attractive as a 7 man A 2.5 woman is as attractive as a 5 man I just disagree with this. You state this as a fact and then use it as the foundation of your argument, but I haven’t ever seen this idea before. A 10 woman is as attractive as a 10 man. A 5 woman is as attractive as a 5 man. If you just redefine it to mean whatever suits your argument... then lol alright
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:23 PM

Or it’s because you don’t have weird hang ups about sex
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:16 PM

If you view consensual enjoyable sex as becoming a cum dumpster, then you probably have some sexual hang ups and most men are better off avoiding women like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 03:11 PM
6

Are they really less tolerant? Or are they just less tolerant of intolerance?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 08:12 PM
1

I’d like to introduce you to a country called Brazil https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazil
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 07:40 PM
1

At least in theory, a sense of decency and integrity
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 07:30 PM
1

Why would you expect him to pay for 100%? Surely you were both equally involved in the conception?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 07:27 PM
3

How does contributing equally show a disinterest in forming a union? I would think that both partners putting in effort/money/value would be a given for a successful union
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 07:08 PM
1

Don’t worry man, people who can follow basic logic understand what you are getting at.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 05:11 PM
2

I seem to be in the minority here, but yes it is a turnoff for me and somewhat of an orange flag. Some people are saying that it’s admirable or a show of her strength of character, but I think it’s much more likely that she has some hang ups about sex. I would much rather date somebody who already knows that she enjoys sex. My n-count isn’t really high per se, but I want somebody with a more similar life experience. Beyond that, unless I really wanted to pursue a serious relationship with her, I…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 03:52 PM
3

In this case though, you aren’t manipulating her. You are just doing what is right, and she thinking the stuff herself, and you still gain from it. Yep, this is exactly what I was getting at. Getting to the same end result as the guys intentionally manipulating her, without actually engaging in any immoral behavior, is a win in my book. Or at least it isn’t a loss.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 08:05 PM
0

If she’s already decided that’s she’s really into him “What happened? I thought the date was going so well. Did I do something wrong? Does he just not really like me?” then her having these thoughts isn’t actually a bad thing for the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 04:21 PM
3

So hasn’t something changed then?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 04:09 PM
1

Lmao I thought this was really good satire until I realized you’re serious 😳
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 01:07 PM
3

Say that a woman is average looking. If she is seeking casual sex, she will have an abundance of available partners. Some of those options will likely be attractive men who are willing to engage in casual sex, but not an exclusive relationship. If casual sex is all an average man is offering, then why would a woman choose him over the very attractive guys? And any woman looking for something serious will not consider you. Expressing interest in a serious relationship would make an average man mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 09:58 PM
1

you're gatekeeping true tested love for parents who stay together for love I mean, it seems like they’re just arguing the inverse of this post, using the same logic as this post. Ergo the post kinda sucks
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 06:49 PM
1

I think it’s one thing to say that child free couples are on average more happy, because none of them are together out of the obligation of raising children. It’s the leap from that to “no couples with children can truly love one another” that I personally can’t follow the logic of.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 06:44 PM
3

But if people still buy and sell it at that rate, why would I opt to sell for lower than I know people will buy at?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 05:51 PM
1

lmao whoops sorry, I didn’t realize this was a private convo. Next time just send something to his inbox so it stays between you two
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 06:36 PM
1

What? The same point as you made in your comment “The men here adamant that only broke dependent bitches are suitable are not American.” It directly answers the question in title.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 04:58 PM
2

Are you really going to act like you didn’t see this definition on the same page? “to take advantage of (a person, situation, etc), esp unethically or unjustly for one's own ends” Dictionary.com
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/21 04:34 PM
1

All right, I get it. You aren’t interested in actually engaging with anything I say.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 10:31 PM
1

You’re hyperfocusing on sexual orientation Yes, because it is the single most important thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 09:39 PM
1

Okay, I can orgasm more quickly when masturbating too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 09:19 PM
1

So you’re point is that a straight woman can easily find a gay guy to fuck her in the ass? How about if you replace the straight man with a gay man (also attracted to men). Gay man can easily find a guy to fuck him in the ass -> gay man enjoys this -> gay men, tops and bottoms, both benefit from male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 09:18 PM
1

Penetrating with your penis is designed by evolution to make you orgasm That still doesn’t mean that every encounter necessarily ends with the man reaching orgasm. How is having sex with my preferred gender a privilege if that sex doesn't involve my pleasure or arousal I didn’t make that claim and wouldn’t try to. But, believe it or not, sex can be pleasurable for a woman. Anyway though, my point was just that the argument about straight guys not wanting to get fucked by gay guys doesn’t actuall…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 09:07 PM
1

Right but what about the huge difference between having sex with a partner that matches your sexual orientation vs with a partner that does not? I would say that the straight man probably doesn’t want to penetrate men either, even if given the opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 08:48 PM
2

I’m having a difficult time following your logic here. You seem to be making the following argument. A straight man could easily find a gay guy to fuck him in the ass -> the straight man wouldn’t be into that -> therefore easy access to sex with men is not desirable, i.e. not a privilege. What you’re deliberately overlooking is that a straight man by definition has no sexual attraction to another man. Sure, a straight woman might not find most of her options for casual sex desirable, but they ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 04:38 PM
1

Uhhhh I wouldn’t say that I’m successful yet, just on the path to getting there. I’m only a couple years out of college so I’m well aware that others have much more life experience than I do. So I can’t say that it has given me much of a leg up professionally. It’s hard to say that I get more respect or am taken more seriously, because I don’t have anything to compare my own experience to. What I can say, is that it has helped with getting attention from women, especially tall women. When I was …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 04:50 PM
1

I don’t disagree with your premise that those other factors are more important than height. I’m tall. Taller than the vast majority of people I interact with. Despite that, I’ve seen plenty of men shorter than me have more success with women. Success with women (or promotions at work) is not directly linked with height. But I’m 100% sure that I have benefited from my height. I don’t think many short but successful men would have been worse off if they were the same exact person but taller.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 03:53 PM
2

I’m not sure how the examples you put forward prove anything. A very tall, very successful man is still not as successful as a very wealthy and corrupt head of state. One of the biggest celebrities, best basketball players of all time, and very tall man still doesn’t have the global influence of a short multi billionaire. A single very tall and successful man once said that if he weren’t successful he would be a virgin. How does the success of some short men, and comparing their global influence…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 03:35 PM
1

If the story is compelling and/or the world is interesting, then the gender of the main character usually doesn’t matter much to me. If the focus of the book is on the experience of a particular gender, then I would say I’d prefer to read one about the male experience. I remember reading The Awakening back in high school and just not being able to get into it. Description from wiki: “the plot centers on Edna Pontellier and her struggle between her increasingly unorthodox views on femininity and …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 05:36 PM
1

For some reason I didn’t think we were all teenagers here
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 02:57 PM
8

Hmmm... very convincing
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 03:05 PM
5

Thank god for threads like this. They remind me how fucking stupid so many people are. Gott RES flair a whole bunch of people, so I know not to take anything they say seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 04:24 AM
2

So if he doesn’t ask, you just don’t object at all? You end up having unwanted sex without ever saying ‘no’ or ‘stop’?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 07:37 PM
4

No, I’m comparing the type of guy who puts “no fatties” in his bio to the type of woman who puts “no losers” in hers. And women who also get mad because a guy wrote “No Golddiggers” are oversensitive too and are most likely gold diggers themselves. Aren’t you reading too much into things with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 02:36 AM
7

Lol this isn’t about guys getting their feelings hurt and angrily swiping left. It’s just dumb to put in a bio. If you really need to announce that you don’t fuck with losers... well the assumption is definitely that you already have. If a guy put “no fatties/ gold diggers/ single moms” in his bio, that would be met with a very similar eye roll from me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/21 12:22 AM
7

If a woman puts “No scrubs/Fuckboys/Losers” in her bio, it just isn’t a good look. Do you really think that line will deter the types of people described in it? Wouldn’t most desirable men with options prefer to swipe on women who don’t put dumb shit in their bios? Sure everyone might have baggage, but if you have a few sentences to give people an idea of who you are, is highlighting your baggage really the best choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 10:05 PM
1

Sure, I never said not to.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 07:47 PM
2

What percent of men are looking for only casual sex? What percent of women? My guess is that the percent of men who only want casual is much higher than the percent of women. You can tell casual seeking men that they should only go for likeminded women, but the odds aren’t in their favor. Other than the warm feeling of doing what you (and much of society) says is right, what do they have to gain from that behavior? I’m not saying that men should deceive women and lead them on to get sex. Just th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/21 03:58 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/21 01:48 PM
1

Then take it up with them when you actually come across it
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/21 06:00 AM
2

Yet because the top .000001% of the power spectrum are mostly men that means that men have it easier? Really? Nobody said that. Nobody drew that conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/21 09:51 PM
4

Dude I still don’t know what you’re saying. Why bother answering a nonsensical, unrelated question? When you answered it yourself, you said that yes, it was a patriarchy and that proves the term is meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/21 09:49 PM
4

You seemed so intent on getting an answer that I thought you would follow it up with a legitimate point about something.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/21 09:42 PM
4

Jesus Christ, that was the payoff? You asked it over and over and over and didn’t have any point at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/21 09:40 PM
7

Why the fuck would anyone make a Facebook post proclaiming that? Why would you want to? These aren’t problems. Just end the relationship or don’t start one and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/21 05:23 PM
1

I didn't say anything about societal benefit of skydiving, because it doesn't matter. Nor did I say anything about government funding.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 07:13 PM
1

Alright I'll try again, the logic really isn't too complicated. I don't NEED a parachute, like in a general sense. But given a situation in which I have chosen to go skydiving, considering that I don't want to die, in this situation a parachute is needed. Going skydiving is 100% a non-need. But, in the situation where I have decided to go, a parachute is now needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 06:45 PM
5

Maybe it was just so offensive or revolting that it isn't a surprise to anyone that it would get you banned?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 06:38 PM
6

Extremely introverted women with little to no social life Very shy women with closed body language (yes body language makes a huge difference in whether a woman will be approached) Deformed or ugly women Then what the fuck are these? Just because a few women with those characteristics have been asked out by you, does not mean that all women have. Yes, those characteristics don't guarantee that a woman doesn't get asked out, but that isn't the point. The point is that some women don't get asked o…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 06:35 PM
2

You missed my point. I'm not talking about taxes. I can't have a rational conversation with you about taxes if your starting point is that taxes are akin to slavery. My point is that you keep going around to comment after comment in this thread telling people to keep their legs closed. Why are you only putting the blame on women?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 06:23 PM
1

The point is that those lessons are a greater cost to society than preventing the situation in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 06:10 PM
1

if I’m having sex (which I very much want to have) I NEED effective birth control You can't just take half the sentence and completely misrepresent the intention. The statement is that 'if I'm having sex -> I need bc'. To help you out, the point being made is that if she is going to have sex, given that she does not want to get pregnant, birth control is a need. You cannot logically purpose a need from a non-need. Just saying something doesn't make it true. I don't NEED to go skydiving, but if I…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 06:08 PM
2

Keep your legs close Kind of telling that you're putting the blame on the women... You realize that it takes two to make a baby, yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/20 05:59 PM
8

Dude, I’m not sure why you seem so intent on the poster meeting your strict definition of answering the question. Her response is clearly on topic and of high quality. Or was their actual information there? I can’t tell. Again, yes there is. Just because you can’t see the relevance for some reason, doesn’t mean that everyone else is wrong. It’s an interesting breakdown of male archetypes that goes above and beyond the oversimplified asshole vs nice guy dichotomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 02:34 PM
2

Okay sure, I’m still not sure what your point is. In your first comment it seemed like you were trying to contradict the claim that men would warn their friends about getting serious with someone ‘easy’. Your example was that men point out the easy girls, for their friends to get with. That doesn’t contradict the first point though. Somebody to have a one night stand with, doesn’t need to meet the same criteria as someone you would marry. (or “get serious” at any point on that spectrum)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 09:50 PM
1

Lol it’s an example of one, not a definition applicable to all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 06:40 PM
4

Idk dude, the comment you were responding to was about a coworker who had a pattern of one month relationships. You seemed to say that a possible explanation to leave after sex was that the sex was bad. Sure, that makes sense for a couple of occurrences, but my point was that it isn’t a good explanation for a pattern of leaving each girl right after sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 06:02 PM
0

You know the outcome of the casual relationship from the get-go I disagree. I think a lot of LTRs develop out of something that starts casually. Also if both people are on board with casual where’s the pump and dump? I think it only qualifies as pump and dump if you know that you aren’t interested, but know they are, and continue to pursue them as if you were and then dump them when somebody better comes along. Sure, that’s a subset of casual relationships, but far from the entirety of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 05:41 PM
4

If the sex sucks with every girl you’re with... well.. common denominators and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 05:34 PM
8

Companionship. Friendship. Somebody to talk to. I enjoy time spent with my sisters and I definitely don’t want to fuck them. A platonic friend can introduce you to her friends and some of them might want to fuck you. Women can be funny and can make you laugh even though you find them unattractive. Idk, I mean what value do men provide that women can’t? Most things that make a human life valuable/worthwhile aren’t exclusive to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 05:30 PM
3

What is your point though? Who the fuck cares that a random woman isn’t entitled to love you, nor are they entitled to anything from you? Like yeah, no shit. What do random women have to do with anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 05:24 PM
9

Lol sorry you feel that way bro
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 04:16 PM
8

Sure, but the first comment you replied to was about a guy entering getting serious with somebody known to sleep around. You said, “oh no the opposite is true, guys point out the easy girls as good targets” and well... yeah sure, but for a quick fuck, not relationship material. You didn’t mention marriage, but you replied to a comment about getting serious
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 03:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter