TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ChallenWrites Archive

View 1 post and 72 comments by ChallenWrites on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Sounds like you might just be asexual??? That's totally cool, it's just not a universal experience, lol.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 01:41 AM
1

This is the legal equivalent of writing an Onion article in order to satirize an opponent's poor position. No one is pushing for mandatory vasectomies; it's a political gesture to show how ridiculous it is that anyone should be trying to ban abortion in the first place, because both bills would equally be infringements on someone's autonomy personhood. If you can't see that from the context, you might need better glasses. Maybe there are some absolute idiots out on the fringe somewhere who think…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen17/02/20 02:41 PM
1

I feel like you're intentionally mischaracterizing my argument here. My point isn't that people should be able to steal, it's that we ought to live in a society where people don't have to steal to meet basic needs like eating or menstruating in a sanitary fashion. I mean, sure, you can say "nothing is free" and just kinda wash your hands of the whole issue, but it's only really by chance that you're one of the people in a position to do that, rather than one of the people who's actually facing i…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 04:36 AM
1

I didn't say theft was right -- I said it was right to protest the human rights issue behind the scandal this brought up. I don't approve of stealing, but I also understand that there are people out there who have literally no other avenues of getting by. Does that mean it's right to steal basic necessities? Of course not. But does it being wrong to steal change the fact that those necessities are still necessary? Also no. Stealing is not good, and pointing out where the system is failing people…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 01:41 AM
3

I fuckin' wish tho--
/r/MensRights09/02/20 01:53 AM
1

It obviously shouldn't fall on Tesco, a private company with its own bills to pay, to provide these things for free to people via thievery, but the fact that it's become enough of an issue to inspire this level of outrage when that sign went viral does spark a valid conversation about why it is that we have a society where some people can't afford to menstruate. Or clothe themselves. Or eat. It's not necessarily a gendered thing here (and the fact that discriminating against shoplifting is being…
/r/MensRights09/02/20 01:32 AM
2

If I grabbed anybody without them expecting it, even with the intention of saving their life, I can't imagine I'd be doing anything different afterward than this guy did here. It's obvious that he knew she wasn't aware of the threat -- which is why he jumped in to save her -- and that therefore his "weird and sudden behaviour" in grabbing her warrants explaining. So... this is a totally reasonable action that occurs irrespective of gender lines.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 12:39 AM
2

I agreed with literally every other point this post made except for that last tidbit. Ultimately, the choice to abort should always be left up to the person having the abortion. He's welcome to have his grievances and definitely should be emotionally supported if he considers it a loss, but he shouldn't be able to coerce her out of it. "Consulted" in this case really ought to be, "I'm sorry, but I can't have this baby -- how can I help you come to terms with your grief?" Circumcision shouldn't b…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 06:34 AM
1

I suppose you and I have different views on what people should be allowed to do on account of their (very subjective) religions, but I see where you're going. Any law can be bent the wrong way -- at least this one starts with good intentions. So far I have yet to see abortion information laws twisted to silence anyone who isn't on the deep end of crazy, but maybe I'm looking in the wrong places?
/r/MensRights19/01/20 07:08 AM
1

Well, I guess I don't blame people for protesting any billboards put up by a group who are just generally bigots -- I'm starting to feel like the poster itself is being taken out of context (ie. "protect fatherhood" is probably being used as a stand-in phrase for "limit abortion rights"). Sooooo it seems they've took a perfectly fine message and twisted it, which is shitty of them. And considering that this paragraph seems more intent on keeping people from intentionally influencing people going…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 04:40 PM
1

I mean... I support fatherhood 100%, but I'm not anti-choice. I can see why this would ruffle some feathers if we're taking this totally fine message ("support fatherhood") and using it to malicious ends ("don't support autonomous medical decisions because that's not supporting potential fatherhood"). Can you tell me more about the group and/or where to get more info? I tried Googling but couldn't find a name.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 06:54 AM
-5

Uhh, nah, I'm gonna call bullshit on this one until you provide all those sources you keep saying you have but are conspicuously unwilling to provide. Who the fuck interviewed "most women" and found partner counts into the hundreds by their 20s????? Do we, like, not have jobs to go to during the day anymore? Or do we just lie around to receive poorly deserved gifts from beta cucks while riding the carousel and cackling madly? This is 100% incel bullshit until you back it up with science. And "I'…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/12/19 02:13 PM
103

Male abusers outnumber female, the study said. But the number of reports of female educators charged with sex abuse of students is rising — not necessarily because there are more women abusing children, but because they’re getting caught, some experts say. On the one hand, I'm happy to hear that these statistics are rising specifically because the sexual abuse that's already happening is finally being reported more often -- this means that we're getting closer to actually recognizing the extent …
/r/MensRights15/12/19 07:23 AM
6

Don't have an official source on hand for the first bit about women attempting more but succeeding less, but that was actually what I was taught in an intro Psych course at university, so I know it's not being made up (no mention of the patriarchy, though, I honestly can't remember the reason they gave??? it was like four years ago, sorry). And as someone who has been traumatized by the suicide of a male family member... yeah, no, it's still not a gender thing, it's called suicidal fugue and eve…
/r/MensRights10/12/19 03:20 PM
1

This was actually a really interesting article, and I'm happy that you've showed it to me! However, I don't think that it negates my point, because I'm arguing for equal opportunity here, not equal outcome (and arguing on behalf of both sexes, whereas this article was really quite centred on lifting more women up without really addressing their dominance in the literary fields). I'm not saying that lower-quality people should be getting into STEM, but that the best person for the job should be a…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 07:04 PM
1

I never said that the sexes are biologically the same. We are, largely, capable of the same things, but there will always be a bit of wiggle room for preference based on biology -- men going into abstract/physical fields and women going into specific/family-friendly fields. Don't get me wrong, I agree with you on this. I never even disagreed with you in the first place on this point, although I wasn't a fan of your phrasing and misunderstood it slightly at first. What I'm saying, which I can't f…
/r/MensRights30/11/19 02:29 AM
1

Dude, what are you talking about? I never said that gender gaps wouldn't be a thing without barriers -- I said that currently those gaps are being partially influenced by educational norms and lack of support for men in non-STEM areas and that, with that barrier taken away, there would automatically be a more even distribution on account of some men being able to take on non-STEM roles if they so chose, which is an opportunity which they presently lack on account of the factors listed in the art…
/r/MensRights28/11/19 10:22 PM
1

Did you... actually read the article?
/r/MensRights28/11/19 09:57 PM
1

That lmao was meant casually, not as an insult??? I just found it kinda funny that my use of the term "equal opportunity" immediately elicited the opportunity vs. outcome response when I thought I made my meaning of it fairly clear. My b, dude -- I know tone doesn't come off as well over text but I legitimately meant no offence, so please don't take it as an ad hominem, haha. Anyway, I suppose I could have been clearer in my argument; I don't think that distribution would be exactly 50/50, but I…
/r/MensRights27/11/19 08:28 PM
1

I don't disagree that systemic changes are required, but I think that it's important to acknowledge that a great part of achieving that involves inspiring the next generation to help make such those changes. Small impacts add up, and it has to start somewhere!
/r/MensRights27/11/19 08:20 PM
1

Oh no, I don't disagree that it's horribly skewed on a systemic level and needs to change, and I'm also with you that it's wildly unlikely that the system is about to change its tune apropos of nothing. I suppose I'm speaking idealistically in that sense, but I rather meant on a small-scale -- as a teacher myself one day, for example, I'm happy to know this information because I can use it to bear in mind that boys might need extra support in my future English class, for example. I can't say I'd…
/r/MensRights27/11/19 05:48 PM
1

I'm not sure I follow you on this point? It's been pretty demonstrable thus far that the over-encouragement of women and under-encouragement of men academically speaking has been the reason for men underperforming in many areas, so theoretically opening them up with similar opportunities to the ones women have now in non-STEM fields would level the playing field and probably convince more of them to branch out, even if it isn't a perfect 50-50 in all areas. I'm not making the assumption that men…
/r/MensRights27/11/19 05:45 PM
1

I'd never thought about it like this before, but it does make sense! We're hearing more and more these days about the overcompensation for women's initial under-education, and about how boys are falling behind as a result of having less support overall. Ensuring that we offer both sexes equal opportunity in all areas would be the best way to see a more reasonable distribution -- hopefully in university as well, as I think we ladies are still ranking at ~70% of graduates, which is a terribly uneq…
/r/MensRights27/11/19 06:34 AM
1

This is... not how this sub works, my dude.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen26/11/19 06:11 AM
5

Not to mention that it sets the whole rest of the trans community back by tacitly equating them with being secret child sex offenders! I mean, ffs, this is insanity all around!
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/11/19 11:15 PM
13

What does being trans have to do with child porn? Literally HOW would you argue this in court when they ask for the logic behind it????????? This is diabolical and I'm so fucking confused.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/11/19 07:55 PM
1

In an ideal world, you shouldn't have to, but in a realistic one, I would ignore it, too. Nonetheless, the fact that she didn't doesn't mean that anyone deserved to be shot at, and hell, the moment someone started parking and getting out of the truck, de-escalation should have been the first thought on everyone's minds.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 05:30 PM
2

Did you, uh, read the bit of the article where it says that they yelled something at the judges first? Because that's what I'm going off of here. I'm not saying that she's a "damsel" or that it was definitely something horribly inappropriate that deserved the finger -- I'm saying someone said something that necessitated a response, she chose a rude one, and the guys in the truck seriously overreacted (as I'm sure we can all agree!). My point is that most rational people don't expect to be shot f…
/r/MensRights15/11/19 05:29 PM
1

The altercation apparently started sometime after 3 a.m., when one of the judges, Sabrina Bell, raised a middle finger at two men yelling from a passing SUV, and ended after one of those men shot two of the judges. From the way the story sounds, it seems like the guys in the SUV probably said something uncouth in the first place (I would assume catcalling, if we're talking about passing by a strip club at 3AM, but it could have been any sort of taunting just to get a rise out of the group), and …
/r/MensRights15/11/19 04:09 AM
1

Huh, TIL! I suppose I've revised my legal opinion, then. The social argument still stands, but this is super interesting and very much a surprise to me, thank you!
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:07 AM
2

Men and women should be able to be equally shirtless, in my opinion. Chests ought to just be chests across the board, just like underwear ought to just be underwear across the board. Setting one standard for both sexes seems easier than cherrypicking.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:04 AM
1

As a generally body-positive bisexual, I probably wouldn't care at all. But I was pointing out society's distinctions on the issue, not mine, lol.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 07:08 AM
1

Are boxers... not underwear? I'm Googling it and everything I'm seeing says that they're underwear. They're called boxer shorts, but aren't technically shorts -- that is to say, they function like shorts, but socially don't have the same connotation, which is what I was trying to get at here. And everything I can find also says that you can't wear them in public, so...?
/r/MensRights11/11/19 07:04 AM
1

I feel like if you went outside and asked five people on the street how they felt about transparent burqas, you'd get the unsurprising result that that would more likely count as lingerie. I see where you're going with the argument, but we're not talking in practical terms here, only *social* ones. Socially, I can go out in a bikini set and be perfectly fine, but if I swap that out for even a plain bra/underwear combo that's arguably less suggestive, it's no longer appropriate. Likewise, a dude …
/r/MensRights11/11/19 06:59 AM
1

Eh, I'd offer pretty much anyone a five-second rule on their own property if they're just getting from point A to point B, but who wouldn't rather wear a robe outside when it's probably chilly anyway??? Savages!
/r/MensRights11/11/19 06:51 AM
1

Duuuuuuuude. If it were up to me, I wouldn't be seeing anyone's underthings at all, regardless of level of coverage, but this was a post complaining that men can't go outside in their underwear and I pointed out a legitimate social reason for the flaw in their original argument. I don't disagree that the social context between underwear and swimwear is inherently dumb, but it's there, and it's that context which decides what's currently appropriate. Modest or revealing swimwear is in, modest or …
/r/MensRights11/11/19 06:42 AM
1

I don't disagree on that front, but they're both classified as "underwear," which is why they're both inherently inappropriate, regardless of how much they cover. Damn, I really feel like I should have clarified this in my original comment instead of having to copy/paste the same point to ten different people, but then I didn't realize that this was a distinction other people don't make, lol.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 06:36 AM
-4

I don't disagree on the materially covering part. But both are classified as "underwear" and so are equally inappropriate in public settings.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 06:34 AM
2

Well, yes... just like men can wear Speedos, which are underwear-equivalent but are equally appropriate because we classified it as swimwear. It's a social context thing, not a property of the garment. I'm not even saying that that isn't dumb, just that that's the situation we're in, lol.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 06:33 AM
4

Hey, I'm with you on that! I was on campus the other week and passed a girl with these, like, short-shorts with visibly frayed bindings along her thighs, and then metal-ringed holes all over the front and back so you could just... straight-up see her panties underneath??? I cringed very hard. Honestly baffled that she wasn't booted out of class. We're all adults here, you'd think we'd dress at least sliiiiiightly appropriately. (And that's coming from me, who thinks that garters are proper attir…
/r/MensRights11/11/19 06:31 AM
1

Where are you getting that they can? I'm willing to be corrected if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that leaving the house in a bra/panties would be considered public indecency. Like, I could see a woman going around in a bikini (or, conversely, a dude in a Speedo) but I've never seen a gal wandering around in any underthings that are actually meant to be underthings and getting away with it. Am I misunderstanding something here? Not trying to be sarcastic or talk down, this is legitim…
/r/MensRights11/11/19 06:28 AM
4

I had never heard of these until you made me Google them, and I vaguely regret it. With that said, I think those fall under the realm of shorts rather than underwear.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 08:16 AM
-4

Yes, but they aren't underwear (although quite often you can see the underwear, which is its own issue tbh?). It's like of the difference between panties and a bikini bottom -- it's essentially the exact same thing, but different connotations because one is supposed to be interpreted as "underwear" and the other as "public wear." And guys can wear short shorts and gym shorts all they want, as far as I'm concerned. Even Steven!
/r/MensRights10/11/19 08:15 AM
2

Alright. Women can't go out in underwear, lmao. Either way it's not on equal standing!
/r/MensRights10/11/19 08:05 AM
56

But... women can't wear just panties outside, though???
/r/MensRights10/11/19 07:33 AM
1

You know what I didn't see anywhere in this article? A description of the actual movie. The picture tells me it's about space, but that's it. Why would I want to watch a movie if I have no idea what it's about and the articles that are pushing me to support it aren't even gonna tell me if it has a plot? Why do I care about its success as a "piece against toxic masculinity" if they don't even care about whether or not the damn thing can string a character arc along??? If they just told me it was …
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:28 AM
33

You're not the only woman lurking around here! :D Men's rights are human rights, and we should all care about them equally -- welcome to the club!
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:17 AM
2

A police officer getting off easy? /shocked Pikachu face You hear plenty of the same with male police officers getting away with dangerous things (arguably more dangerous than reckless driving, if body cams are anything to go by these days) by being suspended with pay or some such -- not because they're dudes, but because they're on the force. I'm with you in saying that this woman did some dangerous shit and should be charged properly, but this is definitely one of those situations where I don'…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 02:28 AM
1

What a strange assumption. I'm just saying that there are various reasons why someone might be homeless or poor that aren't exclusively able to be chosen or affected. Mental illness, drug addiction, literally just being dealt a bad hand one day and ending up with medical bills/etc. that make higher lifestyles unrealistic or a situation in which there's abuse or danger that can only be escaped by taking to the street. Idk, dude, it's like you've never gone outside and met a person down on their l…
/r/MensRights13/07/19 05:19 AM
1

Are you deadass driving down the road every day assuming that people choose to be homeless??? What, like, they just don't like the architecture? If you work a dangerous job, it's because you like the excitement, not because you're piss-poor and need the money? And people who kill themselves, they just... don't have to be clinically depressed? Clearly your silver spoon is due for polishing, my dude.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 07:57 PM
1

Excuse me if I'm stupid (which is quite possible, I read this in a book months ago and could be buggering it), but I thought that egalitarians were the ones who cared about human rights across the board, whereas humanists referred to those who believed in basing morality on human experience as opposed to animals/gods/etc.??? Like, egalitarianism says "all humans are equally important" but humanism says "humans are the most important"?
/r/MensRights27/06/19 09:35 PM
1

Sorry I'm late on the reply, it's been a busy week over here. I'm genuinely happy that you're willing to try again and I have high hopes for the turnout. Knowing now that she's a psychologist, I would also be willing to bank on the professional vs. relationship distinction being a factor in the problem; there's a level of distance inherent in dealing with the troubles of a stranger, whereas tackling the personal emotions of someone close to you can be an altogether more demanding task (and I'd e…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 05:22 PM
1

Hey, M. I'm not a dude and so I try not to drop by too much to answer things, but if you'll hear me out, I'd like to throw in my two cents. If that's not what you'd prefer right now and you just need the support of other guys who have been through the same ringer you've gone through now, that's fair. First off, I'm sorry she invalidated you. Seriously. This is an issue that I've seen over and over again, the inability to respond to the opening-up of someone close to you, and lemme tell you, tons…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 11:22 AM
3

Now that I would be willing to look into. In fact, stats have always said there are more male pedophiles than female overall, but I'm prone to wonder if they just disperse themselves in equal numbers along lines of opportunity -- that is, more males having access to family members, more females having access to wards, hence why it might be disproportionate? I'm just taking shots in the dark now, though. There is also a case to be made for opportunity alone leading to more cases of assault by peo…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 04:57 AM
1

You tend to remember what you look for. Since looking into this, I've seen a great deal more cases than I could ever have anticipated, but I know that actively being aware of and seeking out those cases means that I'm more likely to notice them. Also, since female rapists are still shocking to people (although they certainly shouldn't be), I could see a push in the news for more "sensationalized" stories... that is to say, the same sort of story we're all used to coming from the other direction,…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 04:36 AM
8

I am absolutely fucking disappointed that even an article that specifically strives to point out how underrepresented female-on-male rape is in the justice system still continues to refer to it as "having sex" in the actual article. The cognitive dissonance is incredible. Also: The judge said Eichler was sorry for what had happened and it was very unlikely she’d target teenage boys again. He pointed out Eichler had already lost her teaching license, respect for herself and the respect of others.…
/r/MensRights03/06/19 11:30 PM
1

If you read the article, you'd see that "more frequently" doesn't refer to more frequently than men, but actually being caught more frequently than before as awareness of this issue is overcoming the sexism that tends to hide it. It also specifies that those who rape teenagers are caught more frequently on account of their victims having autonomy and the ability to report the crime, whereas younger victims are more likely to be scared and stay silent. Just so we don't misrepresent the actual art…
/r/MensRights03/06/19 11:28 PM
1

Y'know what, fair enough. It's a super pervasive myth (and the flyer did mention clothes... somehow I'm not surprised that they didn't bother reading up on anything before printing off their garbage, lmao). I also struggle with trying to understand what goads rapists on, but at least for me, I recognize that I find tons of strangers of all sexes attractive throughout my day and have never once been motivated to follow that up with any forced sexual contact. Much in the same vein that I've come a…
/r/MensRights23/04/19 12:59 AM
1

Interviews conducted with actual incarcerated rapists revealed that clothing choice/etc. really isn't a factor in whom they choose to assault, so much as accessibility and the ability to get away with the crime. That is to say, it shouldn't matter if the clothing is "sexy" so much as it's easy to rip/cut off. Here's one quote from a Psych Today article (https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/200901/marked-mayhem) to kinda demonstrate what I'm getting at here: Even personality plays a role. …
/r/MensRights23/04/19 12:35 AM
9

I was just gonna say, lmao. This screams kink!
/r/MensRights07/04/19 05:38 AM
3

Shame on the people who want these folks punished for blaming the writers for something that peer reviewers are specifically there to catch. It really proves their point more than anything.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 04:09 PM
2

Yeah, I'm not sure how it would really be seen as legal. Raises more questions than it answers, I think.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 04:18 AM
1

The thing that worries me about this is that it can't record, in specifics, what's being consented to and what isn't (ie. "I agreed to have sex with you, but suddenly you've brought your sandpaper dildo collection and I'm less cool with that!"), it leaves out the ability of either party to withdraw consent after the initial signing (ie. "I was fine with this at the beginning but now you're treating me really roughly and something hurts, can we stop now?") and can easily be forged (ie. "Oh, no, o…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 10:52 PM
2

See, the funny thing is that if they don't really believe in the wage gap, then they know they're doing it for brownie points and not to "make a change"... ... But if they do believe in it, then it's worse, because this discount only shows up once a year and so they honestly must believe that they're intentionally scamming all women the other 364 days around the sun. Not to mention, as said below, their female employees, since they presumably don't pay them extra to make up for the "difference."…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:19 PM
1

I was just looking him up and cringed so hard my eyes almost fell out. Oof. But then again, even the dimmest among us can come up with a good observation once in a while, I suppose... (And I didn't realize FemFreq had a brains of the operation. Who knew? :P)
/r/MensRights24/02/19 04:51 AM
1

... ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhheurgh. I do indeed. I'm gonna leave the video up because people seem to be agreeing with his point here, but I definitely don't want anyone thinking I agree with the rest of FemFreq, lmao. Thanks for the heads-up! :)
/r/MensRights24/02/19 04:47 AM
1

Google agrees, although I don't know anything about him outside of this, admittedly.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 06:07 PM
2

Creator says that this is going to be a series -- next part should be on female perpetrators, although I don't see a release date yet.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 03:52 AM
3

There's no such thing as being "lonely" enough to spontaneously rape a two-year-old. Fucking diabolical.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 09:48 PM
1

Going into a marriage with a (reasonable) expectation of being able to have penetrative sex, only to find out that your partner has hid his inability to offer that to you until you've been hitched, is absolutely grounds to annul. Just as it would be if a woman hid having vaginismus or some other sort of condition that made penetrative sex impossible on her end. It's no one's fault that the medical condition is there, of course, but if you're not mature enough to address it with your partner inst…
/r/MensRights10/02/19 08:33 AM
1

Anytime. Best of luck -- sorry you've got to deal with this at all.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 02:09 AM
2

Seeing as this is a home or work situation (?) and not one that you can just walk away from (although, if there were any chance of that being possible, I'd suggest it in an instant) I'd say the most beneficial thing you can do is not react. Let me explain what I mean by this -- it's not the same as letting it go. Rather than agreeing with everything she says, let her go off and say nothing -- but try to lead her into an area where other people are present or at least within earshot of her scream…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 02:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter