TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ChaosConsumesMe Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by ChaosConsumesMe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I wish I could give you a clear cut answer, but each case is so situational that it's impossible to give a sweeping answer. Some victims retain evidence, some suspects retain evidence. Evidence that persists such as hair, clothing with fluids, photos/videos, and now text messages; can all still be found even years later. Say... a drunk girl at a frat party gets raped... and reports it years later. Maybe someone recorded the rape on a cell phone? Maybe the suspect bragged about it to a friend or …
/r/MensRights17/04/18 08:41 PM
7

It's not pointless. Victims aren't investigators, they may not know where to look or how to find/collect evidence. Just because THEY don't have proof doesn't mean we can't FIND it in the course of our investigation. I'd rather have them report it and give us a chance to look than fail to report because they think it's hopeless. Reference the second part of your post; yes, SOME people are motivated to make false reports. It's not just a matter of numbers, it's a matter of documenting a history of…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:03 PM
23

Police Officer here; just because a victim waits to report doesn't mean we are unable to prove it did/didn't happen. Reporting within a certain time limit allows us to conduct a SART test (which is a medical examination to collect evidence and document trauma to the victim's body consistent with being raped). This is a BIG help and can make a case airtight. Outside of that time frame we can still collect other evidence (the clothes you were wearing, photos of injuries you may have taken yourself…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 02:30 PM
3

That's the point. It's designed the intimidate and discourage white people from attending for fear of hostility.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 04:50 PM
1

I usually do at least 10 over and get those slow people out of the fast lane so that traffic gets moving again. If you see a police vehicle moving slowly odds are he is en route to a radio call and trying to read the information whole driving or he's looking for something/someone in particular. Feel free to drive around slow moving police vehicles. The only thing you might not want to do is zip around a police car which is already doing 15-20mph over.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:28 AM
3

Honestly, you don't pat down a womans chest for weapons. Unless the woman is very well endowed they typically can't hide a weapon in their bra, and if there is a weapon is isn't instantly accessible like a weapon tucked I the waistband would be. A gun or knife of any real size would typically be visible through the bra. I have seen officers (conducting a full search) request that a female, with her shirt still on, grip the bottom of their bra cups and the pull the bra away from their chest and s…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 08:28 PM
3

NHTSA analyzed the laboratory test data and found: HGN, by itself, was 77% accurate In my professional experience every time I have observed HGN (horizontal gaze nystagmus) the person has been intoxicated. There are very few and rare circumstances which give a false positive for horizontal gaze nystagmus (such as being albino, having recent head trauma, significant temperature difference to either side of your head, being looking sidelong) so as long as the testing officer accounts for those its…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 06:21 PM
4

Police Officer here. Having watched the video he appears to be conducting a pat down along her waistline to check for weapons... I'm not saying he spent longer than necessary checking her waistline because people CAN conceal small single stack firearms very discreetly, but since her shorts were basically skin tight and didn't have pockets he could have reasonably checked it in about 3-5 seconds. The DUI evaluation isn't the issue, it's the length of time the pat down took that makes it look susp…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 03:02 PM
8

Police officer here. Without knowing the details around who she is or what he saw when he came up to the vehicle (maybe she's on DUI probation, maybe he saw a meth pipe in the center console) you won't know what he's doing. In either case, an officer can conduct a DUI evaluation regardless of the reason for the stop if he observes articulable facts that make him believe you may be impaired due to drugs or alcohol. One of the quickest and easiest ways to determine if someone is drunk driving is t…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 02:52 PM
1

Police officer here. He could be doing one of the following: 1) Pat down for weapons, 2) Probation compliance check, 3) Probable cause search. Without knowing the details around who she is or what he saw when he came up to the vehicle (maybe she's on DUI probation, maybe he saw a meth pipe in the center console) you won't know what he's doing. In either case, an officer can conduct a DUI evaluation regardless of the reason for the stop if he observes articulable facts that make him believe you m…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 02:49 PM
3

Problems with this plan 1) There are many women who don't see a doctor and recieve no prenatal care before giving birth. They simply show up at the hospital the day of and give birth. 2) Where is the check to ensure she is accurately naming the father? What if a man, thinking he is the father, accepts paternity only to find out later after a DNA test that he is not. 3) Balifs don't serve paperwork, the county sheriff's department usually does and they won't spend effort hunting down someone to s…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 11:39 PM
37

Police doing their job to collect evidence is not "sexually assaulting" the boy, don't make things dramatic for the sake of your title. If you don't know what sexually assault is don't use it. If the mom wants to be upset at anyone she should be upset at the false accuser and the system that allows her to go unpunished. The boy DID have sex with the girl. The evidence will prove that. He lied about it, which was bad on him, because the evidence will show he was willing to lie about one thing (im…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 09:56 PM
3

This article gives little to no detail regarding the investigation or arrest of the falsely convicted men. At best, the county could pay for lost wages, pain and suffering, etc. At worst, without any proof of malicious or intentional wrongdoing on behalf of the deputies, it sets a dangerous precedent to hold them civilly liable for a wrongful conviction. There are laws in place to protect law enforcement from civil lawsuit when acting within the scope of the law. If the deputies acted in good fa…
/r/MensRights18/11/16 09:22 AM
7

Why is this under men's rights? Looks like a young officer who got overworked under pressure and threw a punch that wasn't the best strategy for an effective takedown. The onlookers seem to focus on the sex of the subject but whether the subject was male or female an armbar takedown probably would have been more appropriate for an active resistance type subject.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 11:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter