TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CharlesForbin Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by CharlesForbin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This has been law in many Western Countries for decades. It's one of our most significant grievances.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 10:38 PM
-40

Maybe she did, but they clearly have a working relationship, and between them, this is consensual. It is just a hammy performance for New Years Eve. Nothing more. Yes, I know there would be outrage if the roles were reversed, but that outrage is uncalled for, just as outrage over this would be uncalled for. Don't participate in recreational outrage.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 05:59 AM
243

bans solo male visitors due to having been harassed by male visitors. The zoo is in Japan. If the offending male visitors were Japanese, she should just ban Japanese people.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 05:53 AM
2

It's trivially easy to send text messages from anonymous numbers. I am in law enforcement, and spoofed text messages will be obvious in the metadata of even the most basic CCR (Call Charge Records) search. It's easy to spoof [Caller ID], but CCR metadata is impossible to spoof without Network Engineer access of the carrier network, and even then, it would be easily discovered. I use CCR to authenticate disputed calls/messages because it shows the IMEI, SSID, NIC, and technical details of the sen…
/r/MensRights10/01/25 05:51 AM
42

This isn't really a Mens Rights issue here. Yes, it potentially involves parental alienation, but it also potentially involves an alleged child abuser, which is still navigating it's way through the Criminal and Family Court systems. None of us know what really happened, and there's enough uncertainty to disqualify this story as a good example of anything.
/r/MensRights02/09/24 08:21 AM
2

Seriously, why not? Seriously, because you don't happen to have a spare empty country that nobody is using. You're not speaking seriously - You're speaking rhetorically. As satisfying as it might be to see hapless feminists struggling to run a man-free utopia, without men to do all the hard, dangerous, unpleasant work that is needed to run modern a civilisation, you don't need to go that far to see sufficient evidence that it would be a disaster. Everyone with a wife knows that the feminist soci…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 01:07 AM
1

"Who has it worst" is a pointless argument because it's impossible to ever compare in a meaningful way. We'll never know, and it doesn't matter anyway. The arguments and counter arguments suggest that at least they are so close that the only reasonable treatment is equality.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 03:40 AM
4

I don't know why they hate men so much They just hate generally. No sexist male will ever be as vicious and hateful as mean girls are towards other females in the workplace.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 02:31 AM
1

Maybe for one night only, but they wouldn't date or marry him.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 12:59 AM
21

Why do women hate short men so much? There is a direct correlation between earning potential and men's height. Women who rate men on the basis if height are just measuring their potential as a cash machine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2709415/ https://www.apa.org/monitor/julaug04/standing
/r/MensRights24/04/23 04:49 AM
5

Even your own statement about 30 to 40% would make me afraid to report it to you... I take every report, and investigate every complaint. Those percentages are what, in my experience the rate of false allegations were in my investigations. I don't just decide whether to believe somebody or not. My job is to gather evidence and put it to Court. If you're afraid to report because of those numbers, blame the false reporters, not me. For every 30% I found to be false, there was 70% I found to be tru…
/r/MensRights03/03/23 08:42 AM
3

Exactly - and the most serious offence can be embarrasing the Department. There is no sense of humour about that.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 01:01 AM
7

I shouldn't but I was very careful with my wording so as to be clear and factual. I'm only speaking on my experiences, and not the Department as a whole. For some investigators, they might find 100% of complaints validated by evidence, whereas others might find 100% refuted by evidence. For me, it's around 30-40%. I could imagine being investigated for any number of disciplinary breaches: Bringing department into disrepute, unlawful release of information, acts to prejudice investigations, acts …
/r/MensRights03/03/23 12:49 AM
42

I am an Australian Copper. I don't know about the UK, and I wouldn't say it was the bulk of complaints, but my anecdotal experience has it between 30-40%, provably untrue, or at least facts so inconsistent with the allegations that there is not even a reasonable cause to suspect an offence has occurred.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 05:33 PM
1

Sounds very believable.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 02:53 AM
16

...I still don't think we should use slurs that have a gendered or bigoted history... That's a fine ethical standard you can set for yourself, but you don't get to impose that on everyone else. English, like most, is a largely gendered language. I suppose you could say the historic male equivalent of Bitch might be Bastard. I didn't see in your post history any attempts to Police others from using that word.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 11:16 PM
13

...we shouldn't use slurs... Sure, but the commenter here is quoting what the people that knew her said, and the quote is relevant to the discussion. Your preachy comment is not relevant, and counter productive. You're down voted accordingly.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 09:54 PM
2

I find this a fairly childish and petty game of "who's the better gender?" All the examples given of widespread infrastructure collapse, are entirely the result of massive and immediate loss of key personnel. Those personnel were the men, who over time would be replaced by those left - the women. It highlighted all the infrastructure provided by male labour. Presumably, those workforces were made up by selecting the most qualified for the job from a pool of men and women at the time. The replace…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 12:35 AM
16

Modern Feminism exposes itself many ways, but this isn't it. It's not hard to understand why women in general have lost patience with the trans community. Those identifying as trans women, and the hordes of activists supporting them have been eroding women's participation in society in recent years. They are dominating women's sport. They are occupying women's only bathrooms. They avail themselves to programs designed to assist women. The only reason any US President had to meet with Dylan Mulva…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 01:21 AM
2

>He has an odd mix of religious conservative and evolutionary biologist views... ​ Many people, especially those wanting to attack Peterson claim he is religious, but he is not religious at all. He speaks a lot about, and frequently quotes religious texts, from all faiths, generally, but he does so not because he is adherent to the religion. He believes that religious texts, handed down from religious parables are often borrowed from other faiths, and outdate many modern faiths entirely. These s…
/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:05 AM
15

I see - disregard the point and instead a personal attack. I would describe your reply as abusive, but not violent. Abuse and violence are not the same thing. It is possible to be violent and not abusive. It is possible to be abusive and not violent. Do not conflate the two. Even though they frequently occur together, they are different.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 07:25 AM
11

psychological abuse it is still violence... No. It isn't. Violence is violence. Abuse, is abuse. They are both abhorrent but not the same thing. Conflating words with violence is the disingenuous game the left plays. We can be better than that and call things as they are.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 06:20 AM
1

My mother, a radical feminist in the 80's, used to insist to me as a child that rockets were shaped the way they were only because men designed them to be phallic. At 10 years old, I had made a paper plane before and knew then she was full of shit. What neither of us at the time knew, was that NASA actually had quite a few female engineers designing space vehicles. More so per capita, than in any other industry, at the time. Rocket science, as it turns out, has to be a true meritocracy, because …
/r/MensRights07/07/20 03:32 AM
15

Please don't link to paywalled articles.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 01:12 AM
1

The core point of the reply is technically accurate, I think. The perception of feminine weakness, innocence and naivete probably is at the origin of the 'pussy pass.' Because it is treating men and women differently on the basis of gender, it is the very definition of sexist. It's a form of sexism that advantages women or disadvantages men, or both. It is therefore wrong, and should be pointed out. The goal is to treat men and women equally to their abilities, and hold them equally accountable …
/r/MensRights12/08/19 12:29 AM
3

Suppression orders are on a case by case basis in Australia. If the facts of the case indicate that identifying the suspect risks identifying the (child) victims, then a suppression order will be made. The gender of the suspect is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 11:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter