CharmingPsychopathX Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Take infields with a pinch of salt From the very well known ones: Tyler and Julien. Especially my impression about Tyler was extremely negative.	/r/seduction	24/06/22 12:18 AM
3	WARNING: Don't give RSD your credit card! From what I've seen, the whole let's say "provocative" or "don't give a fuck" attitude and behavior they're teaching doesn't work well for themselves. The girls didn't like it, weren't attracted to it. Even worse - they gave a lot of "what a weird guy" or "I hope this creepy guy will go away soon" looks and vibe. In case of Julien it was a bit better (still quite bad though), but he's a tall, better looking guy than Owen - also in that case it was in Poland, where he gets some extra points for b…	/r/seduction	06/11/19 12:51 PM
2	WARNING: Don't give RSD your credit card! That's one of the better ones. I do have certain objections, I think it's not perfect, but it's clearly good. Especially since unlike a lot of other material, which is focusing on stupid stuff, 60Year material is, as you said "to the point", with focus on getting sexual and actually getting laid.	/r/seduction	05/11/19 01:21 PM
1	WARNING: Don't give RSD your credit card! Yes. Send me your email adress by private message.	/r/seduction	05/11/19 11:09 AM
2	WARNING: Don't give RSD your credit card! No, she didn't die, just was wounded. Also I think it was not even murder attempt, but self defence - I think she had a knife and a criminal record. But no matter the above, his views on seduction are solid. I'm just warning in advance so people don't get freaked out when searching info on him.	/r/seduction	05/11/19 05:40 AM
2	WARNING: Don't give RSD your credit card! The absolutely best material I've seen of is a blog by a certain Polish natural - but unfortunately, it's in Polish. In English, I'd recommend Gunwitch, who presents a incomparably more realistic view on seduction than RSD does. I know the dude looks a bit creepy and he shot a woman in the face, but his views are solid. BTW Long ago I was doing different PUA methods with mediocre results (RSD included), then I slowly realised that there are a lot of lies in the PUA community, a lot of false info…	/r/seduction	05/11/19 01:13 AM
2	WARNING: Don't give RSD your credit card! Todd? Have you seen how his LTR looks like? I haven't yet met anyone who finds her attractive.	/r/seduction	04/11/19 08:41 PM
2	WARNING: Don't give RSD your credit card! My personal answer: I've met some of them IRL, seen them in action and my opinion about their skills is very low.	/r/seduction	04/11/19 08:40 PM
3	WARNING: Don't give RSD your credit card! I've only used their free stuff and I like it. The problem is, the RSD material isn't too good. You may subjectively like it, but it doesn't mean it's good in terms of matching how women and seduction actually work. Very often people "like" things they simply want to hear - like the infamous "looks don't matter" bullshit, or it's more moderate version "look's don't matter much". People like it, but it's largely false, it's "feel good" marketing, not accurate information.	/r/seduction	04/11/19 08:31 PM
16	WARNING: Don't give RSD your credit card! I love what they did for the community and the amount of value they keep giving us for free is crazy. I'm sorry, but it seems you're still partially misguided about them.	/r/seduction	04/11/19 10:14 AM
1	With RSD And Tom Torero Gone, Who Are the BEST Dating Coaches Of 2019? Yes, I do. Give me your email adress and I'll send you the photos.	/r/seduction	02/11/19 10:40 PM
3	I need to Bitch about RSD. They are Completely Done. I had the displeasure of meeting some of these "heroes" in real life - Owen, Julien and some others, many years ago. They've made a very bad impression on me as people and a very bad impression as far as their so called "skills" are concerned. The stuff you wrote about - being in it for the money, cult like behaviour, etc - do you really think it's something new?	/r/seduction	30/10/19 09:41 PM
1	Take infields with a pinch of salt Great post! Unfortunately, there is a lot of dishonesty in the PUA community. It has been so for more than a decade (I'm almost 40 and I've entered the community in early 2000s), it has not been fixed and I doubt it will ever be fixed. I had situations when I've met some "famous" PUAs in real life and it turned out they sucked at seduction - completely contrary to their internet image, including infields.	/r/seduction	30/10/19 08:06 AM
3	With RSD And Tom Torero Gone, Who Are the BEST Dating Coaches Of 2019? Have you seen how Todd's LTR looks like? I consider her to be 4/10.	/r/seduction	30/10/19 07:52 AM
1	Cold approaching doesn't work, unfortunately I'm sorry, but cold approaching absolutely can work, I've fucked dozens of girls that way, many other people all around the world also got laid by doing cold aproaching. The problem is that you are unable to do it at the moment. BTW On the other hand, while cold aproaching definitively can work, it's also not as easy as many people in the PUA community are presenting. Are there any good indirect tactics to not seem 'creepy'? It can be very had to explain if you don't know it from real world, b…	/r/seduction	25/07/19 11:25 PM
0	Models by Mark Manson The problem is, it is a simple fact, that if somebody can do both well, dishonesty is undeniably better than honesty, as one is not limited by what the actual truth is. It's not being dogmatic, it's a simple fact you seem to be either unable or more likely unwilling to understand. I've noticed many times that in this matter, a lot of guys have a "moral problem" with this, as they emotionally believe in honesty - and ironically act on it in a dishonest manner, trying to present an emotional, mora…	/r/seduction	23/07/19 10:00 AM
1	Models by Mark Manson And why do you think so? I think that a person good with women would probably be aware that dishonesty can work very well with women and it's (ironically) dishonest to promote honesty as the "right choice" without informing the reader about the former fact.	/r/seduction	23/07/19 01:57 AM
1	Models by Mark Manson Why do you say I was "blindly dogmatic"? It's really a simple fact that dishonesty can (if done right) give better capabilities, as it is more flexible and can be used to tell the woman what she wants to hear, to tell what is beneficial for success. Compared to that, being honest is extremely limiting. Your point that not everybody is good at being dishonest is of course correct, but that still doesn't change the above. While it is promoting honesty, "Models" seems to be not very honest with…	/r/seduction	23/07/19 01:42 AM
1	Models by Mark Manson If you desire an honest relationship, then of course honesty is the thing for you, since that's what you want. But when it comes to the "Models" book, I'd still be careful with a book that is promoting honesty, but isn't too honest with it's readers (what irony).	/r/seduction	23/07/19 12:45 AM
1	Models by Mark Manson It's a very bad book. I highly doubt the author was ever good with women. The central idea that being honest is a good thing in seduction is just horrible and very far from reality. Because in the real world, not writer fiction, the aproach of "tell the woman what she wants to hear" works incomparably better than honesty. BTW I do know that many people recommend it, but the level of the PUA community was always bad, with people believing different kinds of erroneous stuff and being totally con…	/r/seduction	22/07/19 12:34 PM
1	Did Mark Manson distance himself from seduction? No, I've only read "Models".	/r/seduction	15/06/19 08:35 PM
3	Did Mark Manson distance himself from seduction? One big reason is because Mason claims that honesty is a good thing in a seduction. Which might be his personal, subjective preference, but it's certainly not universally true and it's actually dishonest to present it as such (what irony). I've met many good and some very good seducers in my life and all of them were lying to women, none of them were honest with them. BTW I'm talking about guys who were genuinely good, naturals with a few exceptions, not about usual PUA community people, who are…	/r/seduction	14/06/19 12:43 PM
1	Thinking of Paying $3,000 to Get Tyler RSD as a Coach.. Is it Worth it? In my opinion: NO. I've met Tyler (and Julien and some others) in real life and my impression was very negative.	/r/seduction	14/06/19 10:10 AM
3	Did Mark Manson distance himself from seduction? So Models is one of the most recommended books here (rightly so imo). And in my opinion, it's a really bad book, which is popular due to unfortunate reasons - because the level of PU community is (and always was) bad.	/r/seduction	14/06/19 09:56 AM
1	Newbie request: good books to read I know PUA community for around 17-18 years, I have met many seduction "gurus" in real life. My opinion about the PUA community is very bad - there are a lot of guys lying about their succeses and skills, and making good money as the result. Many people had the same experience - when they've met some "guru" in real life, he was a pale shadow of the image his marketing created. I recommend this free ebook about how toxic the PUA community is: http://www.aaronsleazy.com/files/Aaron.Sleazy.De…	/r/seduction	15/01/19 11:32 PM
1	Newbie request: good books to read I've met a few RSD instructors in real life and my impression ranged from bad to very bad. BTW It's not limited to RSD, it's a very common problem in the whole PUA industry - image created by marketing materials, which include YouTube videos, is one thing, while the person in real life is often quite different.	/r/seduction	15/01/19 11:15 PM
1	Newbie request: good books to read But that's not really a good book - it might feel good to read, but the author doesn't seem to be too competent. One thing which makes me shake my head was that he thinks being honest with women is good - while the obvious truth is, being not honest with women gives one much wider possibilities.	/r/seduction	15/01/19 11:12 PM
5	Shit test vs insult Very good observations. A lot of guys (idiots) in the seduction community think it's a "shit test", when in fact the girl is simply insulting and rejecting them.	/r/seduction	15/01/19 12:17 AM
2	What is your opinion about RSDMax ??? My opinion about RSD is extremely bad. I have seen a few RSD people in real life, some in action with the girls - including Owen and Julien, and my impression ranged from bad to very bad. They seemed to have a creepy, unpleasant vibe and the girls reacted badly to them. I don't see them as guys who are good at seduction, my impression was different. I rate many other, non-famous people much,myself included, much higher when it comes to seduction. BTW Many people might consider rating oneself a…	/r/seduction	15/01/19 12:10 AM
2	Credibility of tips and infields online Generally speaking, credibility is extremely low. In case of many seduction "gurus", it's unofficially known that they are conmen, who are average or even bad at actual seduction. In other words, many of the them are claiming they can teach you something they cannot do themselves. In case of the infield videos, many people have noticed, that many seduction "gurus" who are average/bad at real world seduction, somehow look competent/effective at the videos. In some cases, it's known for 100% the…	/r/seduction	13/01/19 09:08 PM