TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Charwinger21 Archive

View 0 posts and 190 comments by Charwinger21 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

The wayback machine doesn't do a backup unless someone requests one.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:47 AM
1

What happened to /u/rightsbot?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:09 AM
2

Unfortunately a sample of 600 (I thought there was only 400 before the brigade on the recent survey) for a population of almost 90,000 has a very large margin of error, even before getting into things like self-selection and the fact that reddit's population is not representative of the overall population of the world.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:58 AM
1

I'm not stupid, I know that. The file won't open in excel. I just tested it. It works with Excel 2010, OpenOffice, and LibreOffice. Which version of Excel are you using?
/r/MensRights14/04/14 12:10 AM
1

File->download as -> excel
/r/MensRights13/04/14 09:18 PM
1

Download it to excel and remove the numbers. It should fix it. You may have to redo the tallying though.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 09:15 PM
3

Publish the survey without the data from that hour. Just straight cut off every answer after that point.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 09:14 PM
1

How the hell is it "sexist" to avoid Subways which have a predominantly male workforce? Avoiding eating somewhere just because someone of a specific gender works there (regardless of what gender it is) is sexist. Similarly, not eating somewhere because someone with a certain skin colour works there is racist (as /u/mirazatha pointed out). And not eating somewhere because someone of a certain age works there is ageist. etc. TL;DR, deciding not to eat somewhere simply because people who fit into a…
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:06 AM
4

I don't see the problem here. A lot of people I know specifically avoid going to Subways where men work. Who wants that? Well, for one /u/EmperorYogi2Point0, hiring only a specific gender is sexist and illegal (unless being that gender is somehow a bona fide requirement for said job). Secondly, avoiding eating somewhere just because people that fit into a specific demographic work there is also discriminatory, and in this case sexist.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:03 AM
13

Let's take this to its logical conclusion. If she pay raises only the lazy, fires or forces quits from the workers that she requires to do all the hard work, and hires from a sample size that has been effectively cut in half, what do you think will happen when her own boss from Subway starts seeing profits and productivity falling? It will be a gradual fall, and will not be directly noticed. Once it is noticed, it will be blamed on the area becoming a bad neighbourhood or on extensive competitio…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:57 AM
2

2- The fact that there's a "feminism" sidebar, doesn't mean it falls under only that category. Why not expand MRA related articles and eventually maybe add it to a Wikipedia MRA portal Unfortunately attempts to do just that have been met with edit wars (see the Domestic violence against men article for example).
/r/MensRights31/03/14 10:19 AM
4

It's because when you comment on something that someone has control over and has failed to change (such as their weight), you are commenting on their personality. If you comment on something that someone can't change (such as their height), then you are commenting on things that are out of their control. It's not right, but that's what causes the different reactions.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 02:41 AM
2

Or one, one brags, about, rampant punctuation. Using excessive commas is different from using commas to separate items in a list, such as is the very purpose of the Oxford Comma.
/r/seduction23/02/14 09:25 AM
1

GSP. He does have a couple tattoos, but they're usually hidden when he's outside of the octagon.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 09:47 PM
5

And therefore if he was faster he probably wouldn't get hit in the head as much, and wouldn't be as tired...
/r/MensRights13/08/13 09:41 PM
7

If that was the point, then why didn't it say that?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 07:15 AM
2

This subreddit shouldn't be exempt from /r/bestof since the whole purpose of that subreddit is about finding gems in non-default subreddits. It used to be about finding the gems of reddit.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:35 PM
1

Dammit. Now I can't get this out of my head.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:50 AM
2

I think the go to positive story right now is Brian Banks. We probably won't hear too much more about it until either he gets a spot on the Falcons (hopefully) or the documentary comes out.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 06:47 AM
8

How about a fat people only gym? Those exist. Not de jure of course, but de facto there are gyms that are primarily populated by overweight and out of shape people. Planet Fitness is a "favourite" of /r/fitness (offering free pizza as part of membership and not allowing free weight usage) and has lead to some funny parody commercials.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:22 PM
1

PS - Since the bot creator deleted his/her account, the "Why" link doesn't make any sense. Perhaps this should be updated. How does it not make sense? The post is still there, isn't it?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:04 AM
4

It's an affiliate link. If you click it and then buy something from amazon within x number of hours, then they get money.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 01:56 AM
7

There are also white male only scholarships if you: are a WASP Similar ones exist, as well as for descendants of the American Revolution. "The applicant must be a current member of the Massachusetts Society of Mayflower Descendants OR prove that the student is the son, daughter, granddaughter, grandson, niece, nephew, grandniece, or grandnephew of a current member." Are European-American, here's a random example. "U.S. citizens of Italian descent (at least one Italian or Italian American grandpa…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:09 PM
5

If you're talking about this link, then it's still on the front page.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:46 AM
7

/r/Toronto is fairly downvote heavy.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:41 AM
3

Sendgrid, a company I have respect for now, fires Adria for failing to do her job, not to placate nerd rage (nice neckbeard reference there, you must hate programmers). She failed. They didn't act until they were under sustained DDoS for quite a while (which was directly threatening their business due to people not being able to visit their website).
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:38 AM
1

Well, SendGrid comes close. Not really. They didn't act until the actions of Adria Richards were directly threatening their business (due to the sustained DDoS that was going on in response to said actions).
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:33 AM
3

A decent number came after the link was posted. Also, the way Wikipedia is run, it's closer to a debate than a vote. You're trying to convince the mods, not get the most people.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 12:44 PM
11

I was sticking with just the Arkham Game canon. DCU Canon goes all over the place. Batman shoots God, Tumbles though time, gives fire to Cavemen, tumbles to a secret library at the end of time and then rigs it to expload, founds Gotham City and makes a deal with a Bat Demon, tumbles though being a pirate and the 1920s, almost get's killed by his parents at a demonic sacrifice, and makes his way back to present day. All in a week. And Batman is still the most believable superhero in the DCU Just …
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:00 PM
12

If you trained with a ninja clan, had all the money in the world, and were superhero, yes. Batman doesn't do anything impossible with his body. Actually, he does. Aside from a lot of the impossible things that he does relating to his utility belt, it is canon that he benches 1000 lbs raw for reps and can punch people so hard that they fly through brick walls. For comparison, the world record bench press is 1075.0 lbs with a bench press shirt for a single rep. The world record for raw (partially …
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:30 PM
3

For feminist to basically to alternate history they have to be in control of it no? They don't. There are various stats and that studies that disprove various claims of feminist. All feminists can really do is best try and draw a different picture but its one that isn't there. By claiming that small points in history are different from what actually happened, they are able to slowly shift the public opinion's viewpoint on the past. After a long enough time, it would create a completely different…
/r/MensRights04/02/13 06:35 PM
27

My understanding of feminism is different than yours it would seem. Some feminist may be assholes but feminism as a movement isn't necessarily antimen. That is exactly the problem at hand. Generally the MRM does not have a problem with what the average person who identifies as a feminist believes in. What MRAs have a problem with is that it is radical feminists (the "antimen" "assholes") leading the debate, and the silent majority is lending them support by identifying under their name.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 12:06 AM
4

Unfortunately it's the loud radicals that are leading the debate, not the more level-headed masses that are lending them support by identifying under their name.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 12:02 AM
9

Opposed to creepiness does not equal white knight. /u/CarlosWeiner's post essentially boiled down to: I think PUA lingo is creepy. OP used PUA lingo, so he must be creepy overall. I used PUA lingo when I was learning this stuff, but now that I have more experience I've moved And that is why people are calling him a hypocrite and a white knight (especially the 2nd part where he assumed that because OP does one thing a certain way that he doesn't like, OP must be creepy overall).
/r/seduction19/01/13 09:36 PM
1

According to the 2010 study the percentage of male victims that were willing to admit to being raped is slightly higher than the same figure for women (excluding people in prison). If that actually ends up equalling 1 in 6, I have no idea.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 12:34 AM
3

Cultural differences and a small sample size probably. Here's a quick comparison of your experiences and my experiences. (Canada) I have never been on a date and been expected to pay. I plan out dates so that the question never even comes up, however I constantly hear people I know IRL complain about it. No one I have had a relationship with has ever expected expensive gifts from me. I know more than one girl who has explicitly stated to me that they expect gifts from their boyfriends. I don't k…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:39 AM
2

The link in the sidebar is http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/faq The link you posted is http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq They appear to have the same content, but different formatting.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 03:07 PM
1

Aren't Olympic teams mostly 18-21 year olds anyway? I know they have age restrictions in soccer. If so, doesn't this actually show that the gap isn't as big as people think it is? The captain is 34, and she's not the oldest on the team. The youngest player is 21. The reason for the age restriction in Men's Olympic soccer is so that it isn't the same tournament as the FIFA world cup. Instead it is an U23 tournament with 3 overage players per country. The Olympic Women's soccer tournament is open …
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:51 PM
18

In Canada an apology is not an admission of guilt. In Canada, "sorry" is "an expression of sympathy or regret".
/r/MensRights18/12/12 01:14 PM
11

Depends on the team. The Canadian women's hockey team is at about the same level as an average Canadian high school boys team.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:25 AM
6

They play against men's high school teams, not mens university teams. They had a 16-10 record against Alberta high school teams during the 2009-2010 season. A fair number of the players on the women's olympic team play on university level women's hockey teams.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:23 AM
2

Even watching Women's Olympic hockey today I feel 100% confident that my varsity high school team could destroy them, even though they easily would have a size advantage over an average size group of 16 an 17 year old boys. The top Women's hockey team in the world practices against boys high school teams.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:21 AM
1

Highest Elo for a woman is 2709 ( Judis Polgar). Her peak rating was 2735 which placed her at number 8, but she also is very unusual in that she is considered to be an "educational experiment" carried out by her father. She was taught chess like we were taught english and math. No one in the world other than she and her sisters have received training in chess like it.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:04 AM
1

Make a fake FB account and use BlueStacks. 10 minutes of setup tops between the two of them.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 01:31 PM
1

Yep, no male nudes to see here. Warning: I'd consider this to be SFW, but some people might not. (stone penis)
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:07 AM
3

35) http://i.imgur.com/r9jPt.jpg Don't understand She's implying that Waldo is her brother, and that she needs feminism because she claims that Waldo raped her.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:05 AM
1

The SPLC listed /r/MensRights as a location where misogyny can be found. They never designated /r/MensRights as a hate site or hate group.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:02 AM
4

Unfortunately, while a decent number of the people there are saying that women can rape as well, the vast majority seem to be saying that the numbers are so insignificant that it doesn't even deserve one ad in that series. That's even when the 2010 NISVS was posted, the numbers of which would indicate that 59% of rapes in the previous year had males involved as the perpetrators, and over 41% of rapes in the previous year had females involved as the perpetrators. TL;DR, it is progress, but there …
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:31 PM
13

If she is indeed Danielle Sandhu (which appears to be likely based on a quick google search), then she was the VP of Equity for UTSU as of February 2011 and the president in February of 2012 according to the Wikipedia page at those points in time.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:27 PM
4

I realize, I just wanted to nip the potential for discussion about SRS in this thread in the bud and attempt to keep the discussion about the topic at hand.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:14 PM
10

I specifically requested that man_sandwich ask this here instead of on SRS.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:58 PM
14

Just I heads up, I specifically requested that man_sandwich ask this question here in response to man_sandwich's question in this thread. I would highly urge people to attempt to take this on good faith and do their best to provide information on male rape. I'd attempt to provide the information myself, but it's not exactly my area of expertise.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:57 PM
3

Did you even read my post? Dude, this happened in Canada. While there are the occasional assholes, cops here are generally pretty decent.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:51 AM
2

Dude, this happened in Canada. While there are the occasional assholes, cops here are generally pretty decent.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:03 AM
4

Maybe it's just the mobile site that is redirecting, in which case we should really notify them.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:42 AM
2

Looks like it's back to normal now.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:19 AM
3

And the "Fempire" is much smaller? Yes. SRS is MUCH smaller than /b/. SRS currently has 293 users online. /b/ currently has 3770 users posting online (and that's a low number for them). /b/ also has a lot of people who just lurk and don't post anything. Many things come from there, including sexist jokes such as "Get back in the kitchen" but I don't care about that because I know where it's from. Jokes there are often meant to offend people. That doesn't really answer the question that I asked. …
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:37 PM
3

If I seen more rhetoric like that around here, I'd feel less unhappy about the movement. Then you must not be spending much time here, because I see something to that effect pop up in almost every discussion that has to do with feminism. Unfortunately, the person I am replying to basically says he has no women in his life, therefore he has no reason to care about women's rights. And would you look at that. He's getting downvoted for it. Not everything that is posted here is accepted here. He als…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:28 PM
2

I have met good, honest MRAs that point out this stupidity and know that women deserve equality too. Feminism =/= Women's Rights. You can be anti-feminist and still be pro-Women's Rights.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:47 PM
5

SRS fempire is exactly what it is. It's a female oriented 4chan. Have you been to 4chan? Most of 4chan is a Japanese interest forum. /soc/ is about chatting with people and hooking up (most of the major posters there are female). /fit/ is a weightlifting circlejerk and weightlifting culture forum with the occasional advice thread. /fa/ is a fashion forum. They regularly hold meetups. /b/ is a forum where people just go and fuck with each other. The majority of it is just people telling fake stor…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:30 PM
11

Why should feminism support a movement that's trying to deconstruct and destroy it? Why should I as a feminist even care about the MRM until it gets more feminist friendly? Unlike MRAs apparently, if I see an MRA supporting a woman's rights, I want to praise it as I have done in the past, but the general view here is to never support a feminist even if that feminist is on your side. The reason why the above image is looked down upon is that they took two Men's Rights issues (female hypoagency/vi…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:38 AM
2

Just a heads up, the time you posted your /r/AskReddit thread at wasn't the greatest. It was right at the start of the "dead time" when almost everyone is asleep, and it was on a north american Saturday night when a lot of the usual late night people would be out and about. If you post it earlier in the day (Sunday evening, Monday afternoon, etc.) and immediately crosspost with /r/MensRights (linking to the /r/Askreddit thread in the /r/MensRights thread) you'll probably get a better response.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 01:07 PM
1

I have an example of systemic sexual assault targeted at males in a workplace in Canada, although I never acted on it (never filed a complaint or anything like that). Simply put, at a movie theatre that I worked at it was "normal" for the girls to grab all the guys asses and stuff like that while working (to my knowledge it wasn't reciprocated), regardless of what their relationships with the guys were. It was especially common at the concessions stand where people were constantly walking behind…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:52 PM
1

Except that that shouldn't effect what benefits there are under "Obamacare", as that is explicitly illegal under "Obamacare".
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:16 PM
2

Punching someone in the face is assault. And battery as well.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:12 PM
2

"people care more about my weight than my health." Arent these two things connected? They are connected, but aren't the same thing. You can be in great shape and still lead an unhealthy lifestyle. Unfortunately people take that out of context and think that it means "I can be whatever weight I want to be as long as I eat good food and don't do drugs". "Because I want to walk around my neighborhood alone without fearing for my life." feminism will not get you that. That is not a gender issue. If …
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:42 AM
0

You're the worst, no, i'm not confusing it with the electromagnetic spectrum and no, red is NOT " range of colours that are associated with a strong presence of red, and a very light presence of everything else." Red IS a specific band of colours on the electromagnetic spectrum, commonly cited between 620–740nm. just as every other colour corresponds to a frequency of light, even when the colour is artificially produced by combining two separate wavelengths, the resultant colour still correspond…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:14 AM
1

Nitpickings the fun facts? Classy. /r/shittyaskscience But no, i was referring to the colour pink, aka magenta/fushia, rather than the laymen definition of it as a shade. y'no, as in the ones that show up on the colour wheel Yes, you are referring to the human perception of pink, and confusing it with the electromagnetic spectrum. In that way, red doesn't exist either, "Red" is a range of colours that are associated with a strong presence of red, and a very light presence of everything else.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 04:25 AM
2

Fun fact 3: There is no Pink light, whereas almost all other colours correspond to a frequency of light, pink does not, it is an illusion brought about by a mix of red and violet light. /r/shittyaskscience "Pink" is a range of colours that are associated with a strong presence of red, and a fairly light presence of everything else.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 03:59 AM
1

"Ask Rihanna if she mad" They're both abusers and both idiots, however if either of them said something valid and you said "we shouldn't listen to what Rihanna said because she's a man-beater", then that would be, well, the wrong thing to do.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 03:48 AM
2

Unless both parents agree to put the child up for adoption. Or there is a stepparent who is stepping in to assume parental rights. Or if the mother decides to put the child up for adoption by dropping it off at a "safe haven".
/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:46 PM
5

This is a semantic argument. Unfortunately, when it comes to politics and the law, semantics are VERY important. Everything else in your post is a laundry list of allegations with a giant [citation needed] at the end. Which parts would you like citations for?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:45 PM
13

The rest of his argument is actually a complete mess that assumes there is some sort of monolithic feminist entity, goes on to say that there's no female oppression in the US, then finishes off by characterizing the feminist entity as something that throws scraps to men. Nothing he wrote in any way supported the ideas he was espousing, it was 100% pure allegation. You pretty much just described "patriarchy". There actually ARE gigantic feminist organizations in the U.S. and many other countries.…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:43 PM
3

There was a good post about this a short while back.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 08:21 PM
5

I identify as a pickup artist and a social artist, and I can say that this would be a BAD IDEA. I'll repeat that; PUA workshops in a men's centre would be a BAD IDEA. First things first, pickup has very little to do with men's rights beyond the fact that the majority of people involved are male. Secondly, that would bring a whole new level of attacks against the men's centre in question. People view pickup as being very misogynistic, and are QUITE outspoken against it (for numerous reasons). Thi…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:25 PM
3

I'm probably about the equivalent of the U.S.'s communist party. Different countries though, so that's about middle-right here.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:17 PM
3

The biggest problem is that calling it a "financial abortion" leads to the wrong impression of it and gives it a negative connotation. I recommend referring to it as "(Legal) Paternal Surrender" or "Child Custody Law Reform" when talking about it.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:28 AM
6

The problem is with how the questions are asked. It's not exactly a well put together survey.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 01:12 AM
1

Makes sense. Thank you very much for the concise explanation. :)
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:47 AM
1

Wow there was a lot of moderator changes on the 15th.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 12:13 AM
0

Damn. I wish I had remembered that one.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:41 PM
1

Maybe your guyfriends should stop smoking with female MMA fighters. Yikes! lol The chipped tooth part was from her bashing her teeth into his while trying to make out with him (that's just how she makes out. She did it to me previously), and the dislocated ankle was from her putting her weight onto him (he has a weak ankle from a prior injury). Neither of those things prove that it was rape (or even that anything happened), but I believe him. He had no reason (that I can think of) to lie about i…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:01 AM
6

Multiple friends of mine have been raped. None of them have reported it. I was supportive of egalitarian groups before that, but that's what made me become a vocal supporter of the MRM. The earliest case? My brother was raped by a female student at his elementary school in grade 1. I didn't find out until he was in high school. The most recent (and most vivid) occurrence? I was hanging out with some friends at a good friend's house. He went out for a smoke and one of the girls there (who was lea…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:33 AM
31

I posted this from a throwaway that I've used for a few years (just backing it up here): First things first. The majority of Mens' Rights activists do not oppose Women's Rights groups (apart from some radfems that openly advocate systemic chemical castration of the entire male gender). Secondly, here's a good video about what MRAs represent. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9G9AAhlMo4&feature=plcp And thirdly, your post: "Will you stop with all this men's center crap?" The simple fact that you ca…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:48 AM
2

A screwdriver is easier for most people to stomach than some tequila. I'll drink a delicious Harvey Wallbanger any day (it tastes like a creamsicle). That being said, I won't exactly say no to a Club and Coke or rye on the rocks either.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:14 PM
2

Honestly, I thought it was what /u/intensely_human said at first, and I'm a bartender. A screwdriver is one of the basic drinks that many other drinks are built on. It's just orange juice and vodka, but pretty much every fruit flavour+whatever+vodka drink is considered to be a variant of a screwdriver. There's a wikipedia page for it, as well as ones for some of the variants.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:11 PM
2

Canada here. It's actually law in some parts of this country that saying sorry is an expression of sympathy, and not an admission of guilt.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 02:52 PM
9

People react better if you hand your phone to them than if you ask for their number. You reduce the risk of an error when entering the number. You find out the proper spelling of her name. You often can find out her last name that way (which is useful, as otherwise you'll have a ton of contacts with the exact same name). etc.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:09 PM
2

That is untrue at least where I live. Sorry, I shouldn't have implied that it is a global thing. I can only comment on how things usually go here. And once again this argument is all about fathers' rights vs mothers' rights, and turns a blind eye to the rights of the child, which our legal system (at least in theory if not always in practice) is given the top priority. Actually, it's putting more thought into the rights of the child than the current system. The two worst possible cases for the c…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:45 PM
3

Whenever I start a new sexual relationship with someone I am 100% upfront with my intentions with a worst case scenario (I get knocked up) - before having sex with anyone I tell them that I am pro-choice and if I become pregnant I will chose to abort. There are horror stories of people saying things like that, and... well... not being truthful about it.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:54 PM
6

A more apt comparison would be, if a man has a right to walk away from a child, why doesn't a woman? Because they do have that right? They can give the child up for adoption without the father's consent. They can give the child to the father and usually will not be asked to pay for child support. (LPS would make this a viable option de jure as well as de facto if the father agrees with the treatment. If neither parent wants the child, then adoption is an option if the child is already born) Woul…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:52 PM
1

(maybe 48 hours) 48 hours is a VERY short time frame to make a life altering decision in, especially when the decision in question is not particularly time sensitive (as the child has already been born at this point, if I read your post correctly).
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:51 AM
1

It seems to be cut off. Do you have a screenshot with the complete text? edit: not that it's not readable, it's just mildly annoying.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 06:09 AM
1

Who are they going to sue? My IP address changes a good 10 times a day, and I can access wikipedia from 3 unique devices. edit: Not that I'm vandalizing wikipedia. I'm just highlighting how hard it would be for them to find out who it is.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:50 PM
2

Not really. The absolute most they do is ban an IP address from editing and protect the page.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:19 PM
2

I was Don Draper last year. Did it without the cigar and in business casual though. The costume went over well with the people who knew it (including a lot of free drinks), but most people didn't know it.
/r/seduction27/10/12 02:38 AM
2

AMA Request Guidelines You must come up with 5 questions that are specifically related to the topic. Those 5 questions cannot be general questions that anyone could answer, like "what's your favorite color?". Those five questions must be posted in the text of the post. If not, it will be removed. Serious and Reasonable requests, no "AMA Request: God!" The best requests would have a reason to believe they would do it. Search first! Duplicate requests will be subject to removal If you're going to …
/r/seduction27/10/12 02:21 AM
4

More like "radfems and people who support radfems except for when they're called out give feminists a bad name.".
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:53 PM
4

My 16 year old sister can do a single pull up...this seems to be a bit of a lie. Oh, I don't disagree with the general meaning of that quote, just that one part was inaccurate.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 09:27 AM
7

while relative strength is something they can easily compete on the same level as. Unfortunately that's not quite true. Even the elite female weightlifters can't keep up with elite male weightlifters relative to their bodyweight. Keep in mind though, that the lowest safe body fat percentages for women are at a level where men start to no longer be considered "fit".
/r/MensRights26/10/12 09:21 AM
1

Yea libya and Iran pursuing their nuke capabilities prove that point. Wait, what? The citizens of Canada, Denmark, France, and most of the rest of the world having a higher opinion of the U.S. now than they did four years ago is at odds with a two countries trying to improve their military situations? So, what, are you saying that Canada and Britain created the nuclear bombs with U.S. funding because... French and Spanish citizens don't think highly of them? I'm having a lot of trouble following…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:40 AM
1

Even when the people of Massachusetts, a highly liberal state, elected a Republican to stop the health care law obummer still forced it thru. Do you mean Mitt Romney, the guy who created the plan the Obama care is based on? Or do you mean Deval Patrick, the member of the member of the Democratic Party who has been in office since Mitt Romney retired in 2007? Oh, and did I mention that a republican was the Governor of Massachusetts from 1991 to 2007. Four of them.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:04 AM
1

So that still makes what you said before a lie. How so? I said "If your numbers are correct", that means that I was taking your numbers at face value without putting in any extra thought into it. In the 80s U.S. debt was less than a trillion USD. It could theoretically get down as low as zero USD depending on how everything is handled. National debt went up, according to this, $4.90 trillion under bush's two terms, debt went up $4.940 trillion under obummers one term. Normally, debt should go up…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:58 PM
1

obama has been a disaster not just for 'mens rights' but for everyone in america Obama has been a miracle for the U.S.'s international relations. Public opinion of the U.S. in other countries is higher than its been in decades (and it was on a steady decline before he took office).
/r/MensRights25/10/12 11:09 PM
0

Uh 10 trillion for every president since America became independant Actually, it was $5 trillion before Bush, $12 trillion after Bush, and $15.66 trillion currently.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:45 PM
2

If your numbers are correct, that would mean 10 trillion over the course of 8 years in a bull market vs. 6 trillion in 4 years in a depression. A bull market is supposed to be when you get rid of your debt, not add to it.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:01 AM
4

In one of the SRS links, the top comment is about how it's perfectly fine, and the second comment is about how it's wrong because of patriarchy. WTF?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:20 PM
1

My parents have always joked that me and my brothers have to become accountants, lawyers, or doctors, but that's mostly because it's a cultural stereotype, and there are quite a few accountants, lawyers, and doctors in our family. They were fine with me wanting to go into engineering (although I ended up going into something different), and when my dad thought that I kinda liked programming he was fully ready to help me learn it (although he WASN'T encouraging me to go into that field). But whil…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:02 PM
1

And by most standards, Iran is a first world nation. HDI would like to have a word with you. Brazil, Colombia, and Jamaica are all ahead of Iran there. Oh, and don't even get me started on their Gini or GDP per capita. Cuba has a better GDP (nominal) per capita than Iran.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 05:56 AM
5

Serioisly. The whole pua idea is to fit a mold to get women. You're talking as if the pickup community is a single thing. Yeah, there are some subgroups of it that act like that, but it's not the entire pickup community as a whole. Charisma Arts is about learning public speaking in order to be able to portray who you actually are. Simple Pickup is about getting over anxiety and realizing that you can say pretty much anything that you want to. Mystery Method is about learning how people react to …
/r/MensRights20/10/12 10:56 PM
8

I absolutely agree. While most people have an inaccurate view of PUA subculture, usually confusing it with player subculture (which there is some overlap with), it is not the MRM's job to defend them, and defending them doesn't really help MRAs.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 10:23 AM
6

Some people != "[all] feminists", the implication of the OP I posted it in response to a comment that said "Among the most radical of radfems, yes.", which in turn was in response to a comment that said "As in, the actual killing of men? Are you serious, that's a thing?". I think it was pretty clear that I was referring to a specific subset and did not deserve to be called "the idiot". Also, NAFALT.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:35 PM
9

It might have been satire originally, but some people are living by it
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:28 PM
6

Don't just say yes, provide a source
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:38 PM
1

It seems you disagree, and I do not think either of us will be swayed, so we will have to (as quoted) agree to disagree. I was responding to you stating that "'They' is incorrect when referring to a single person." by highlighting that a prominent manual of style encourages the use of "they" in most situations, and allows it in all other situations. Also, despite what you are insinuating, I never made a comment as to whether or not this should be formal writing.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:07 PM
2

I think we will have to agree to disagree. The Chicago Manual of Style allows the use of singular they, although it discourages it for formal writing (where it instead prefers "he or she" or simply a complete omission of pronouns).
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:38 PM
-1

Who was assaulted, and how? Presumably? violentacrez. Remember, assault =/= battery. Assault = "acting intentionally, that is with either general or specific intent, causing the reasonable apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact" edit: Never mind, it sounds like battery actually happened.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:21 PM
3

Here in Canada when ordering pizza for delivery you usually pay for it when it gets to you. It's treated as FOB destination because of various places having deals for it getting there within a certain amount of time or it's free. So I guess you could still order pizza for delivery, just places will start mandating that you pay in advance.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:21 AM
7

which I will never pay for. And now your address is blacklisted, and you can't order pizza any more. Nothing huge, but a minor annoyance. Ha. For what end? Ruining future employment opportunities. HR departments tend to do a quick google search of people they're thinking about hiring currently. Not to mention that it would also paint a negative picture of you to anyone else who Googles you (bye bye online dating) I'm self-employed and my customer base doesn't give a flying fuck what some keyboar…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:55 AM
17

They have more than one computer. You're bringing a butter knife to a nuke fight. ;)
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:21 AM
92

You have a gun. They have an army of phones to order pizzas to your house. They have an army of computers to create fake webpages about you with, and bump those fake web pages up to the top of Google's search results for you. They have an army of people to call where you work, people you know, and your local police department, and spread lies about you. (an anonymous call from a payphone to a crime stopping hotline has little chance of negatively effecting them, but can have serious repercussion…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:18 AM
78

There probably aren't any stock photos of women stealing from men because... well... you get the idea.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:21 PM
0

I know the one you're talking about. It caused quite a stir on their forums.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:42 AM
2

Oh, I see what you're getting at now. You're talking about the original negging from the 90s, where people would say or do something that would make the girl that they're talking to realize that she's not perfect simply because they found that girls were more likely to continue a conversation after that. That was pretty much people playing around with a shiny new toy because it seemed to work. The concept of "negging" has since evolved into any method of actively showing that the simple fact tha…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:34 AM
4

It would appear that we have very different definitions of the term. Could you possibly post what you believe the term to be?
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:11 AM
16

That's not negging. It doesn't even resemble the concept of negging. I'm not defending anything here, just pointing out that you're misusing a word.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:17 AM
1

Dude, if you go by the definition of rape being any time when you are coerced into sexual activity, then that means that MORE than 1/6th were willing to admit that it happened based on the numbers that you quoted.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:13 PM
41

Having spent 3 years working food service, and 2 years bartending, I can assure you that yes it is (on a comparative level). Remember, even 1% is a HUGE jump when compared to a number approaching zero %.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 01:16 AM
2

Nah, I just like showing off how long that link is. It's a male ego thing.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 07:09 AM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 05:55 AM
4

GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH!!!!!! It's the way of the future. The link is working for me with Chrome and IE, and I just realized that I don't currently have FF installed. Oddly, it doesn't seem to be working with Opera though.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 02:15 AM
7

This is a REALLY old image (although it appears to be the super extended version which rarely ever pops up) https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZitR9rzyp9OBKv66bt8n6WK_1IIQEMLKH01BN1OuUsHePFGv30TrtYkB8zf7Jk7RCINF3fMK254NbomeRbT-qpXRotVcvQzRgc0Tme54_1MPPiY1Nenb7iQVS5L73mykdO9rmhZqhQO6XoDtXJp97EzJmLKWbYvBHEauqGwBkpOgaJ-2cE9bO2fbpA91Tg4E1PK_1SHp0izqKke2WxElQhw_1cH3amb6X5h9iYHb5hFDFheRIUZVGT1eIuh3a4rUnvfimwRumGwROyzvM5mYbA44VgaWHcwlNn33WBBY4jQqhqMLEf3PrIGhrCp-KDOWIYj8Qi4m-3G7HV61y7u5o9c4_1I4Mo…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:38 AM
2

From the sounds of OP's post, Reddit runs their ads in a queue and displays the ads for the time frame you paid for. Keeping it on one subreddit would keep all the appearances of the ad in one place.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:28 AM
1

What are you talking about? I wasn't saying anything about whether or not it was ok, just that singling one person out for it is kinda a dick move.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 05:36 AM
2

Dude, that's not a shit test. A shit test is when you're making an advance of some sort, and she says something out of left field to see if you're actually who you say you are, or if it's just a mask. This was (as mikesteane pointed out) an invitation (to what, we're not sure at this point. Probably the friendzone).
/r/MensRights31/08/12 10:40 AM
1

Dude, drive by any uni campus on move in day. That's pretty standard fare for the fraternities, sororities, and any house on the route that the uni recommends that students take to get to the uni.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 07:56 AM
2

Many =/= most. "Many" essentially just means "more than 1"
/r/MensRights28/08/12 07:56 AM
2

Make a similar image, replace "women" with "men", and put it in the comment section.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:56 AM
1

</sarcasm>
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:40 AM
1

If we assume that 50% of patrons are male, you should rarely get a line of more than one person while the other is empty With single sex washrooms? That's falsely assuming that: The order that patrons arrive will closely follow the standard distribution. (In reality you'll often see stuff like "female->female->female->male->male->female->male->male".) That each person is going to the washroom by themselves. (people often travel in groups. That will mean that multiple patrons will head to the was…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:12 AM
1

Except there isn't a third room in this scenario. I know. That's why I first put a way that was "The most efficient way with their current set-up (two identical bathrooms)". The most efficient setup in terms of patrons/hour is to have one room dedicated to men. Nah. It'll be empty too often with their current set-up. If there's ever a line for one and no one in the other if they are identical, it means that there is a queuing failure.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:19 AM
2

That would be most efficient for men, but less efficient for women, as that would increase the amount of time that one washroom is not in use (assuming the same two washroom setup). The most efficient way with their current set-up (two identical bathrooms) would be to have them be unisex in a single queue multi server (washroom) system with no gender discrimination. The most efficient way overall (assuming a population distribution for the patrons of that facility that follows the societal avera…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 12:06 AM
7

Economics. No business owner wants people spending more time in the washroom.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:54 PM
4

At a bar (and other social gatherings like that where there is a high expectancy of socializing in that manner) it's one thing. In Starbucks it's something completely different.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:52 PM
7

I know it seems like it's obvious sarcasm, but you really should put a </sarcasm> tag in when you're posting something like that in this subreddit. (Poe's law is way too strong here) Overall, this subreddit really needs to cut down on the sarcasm (not get rid of it, just cut down on it). It's just not constructive.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:51 PM
5

I think Lugonn was saying that he'd prefer using a men only bathroom as opposed to a unisex bathroom, as, in his experience, men only bathrooms have tended to be cleaner than women only and unisex bathrooms.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 11:49 PM
5

I think it's changed significantly since OP originally linked it.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 12:32 AM
1

I'm not saying it's easier to become an accountant, but it is easier to be an accountant. No risk of death or dismemberment, much longer lifespan, cushy desk, and so on. Oh, of course, but you can say the same thing about being the prime minister. The route to what you're doing is taken into account when people decide what to pay you.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 10:00 PM
1

I think you're vastly underestimating the level of skill and knowledge that is needed to become an accountant (especially if you're in a role similar to that of a CA in Canada). In order to become a CA in Canada you need 4 years of university taking a specific degree with specific courses at one of a short list of universities, and then you have to get hired at and work at an accounting company for 3 years. Oh, and did I mention the UFE? A 3 day, 7 question examination that you take after 7 year…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 07:48 PM
7

It's definitely legal (or at least ignored by governments worldwide). Bars often have "Girls get in free" or "Girls get in for cheaper" type promotions.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:39 AM
3

Done.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 12:28 AM
29

Because then other victims will be too afraid to bring forward their accusations. </sarcasm>
/r/MensRights09/08/12 04:19 PM
1

Honestly, age of consent and drinking age (I'm a bartender so it's kinda what I pay attention to) laws in the U.S. are just a mess right now. In fact, basically every law that should be on a federal scale, but hasn't been explicitly granted to the federal government is a mess. I mean, it varies greatly from state to state (not just where the line is drawn, but what people under the line are allowed to do and whether or not there are close in age exemptions), and some courts in the U.S. have stra…
/r/MensRights29/07/12 07:34 AM
8

Very true. Someone that is 17 years and 364 days old does not need protection from having consensual sex with someone who is 18 years and 0 days old, but some boy who is 10 may need it from some priest who is 50. So where do you draw the line? A hard line at 18 is suboptimal for obvious reasons. I say, go with a graduated system like Canada has (although Canada's system is also suboptimal, it is closer to being optimal). In Canada currently there are three groups: Someone who is 12-13 can only h…
/r/MensRights29/07/12 07:16 AM
3

Nothing good has ever come out of a circle jerk.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 11:29 PM
9

"That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence." I believe that is what beforekurtrussell was getting at. I too have heard the "1 in 4 women" figure, but I've never seen any statistics that projected to more than 20% of the population (and that's without taking into account that people can be raped more than once, however horrible it may be)
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:30 AM
1

It is a crass attempt to promote PUA pussy-chasing. "Hey, if you don't want to end up being like THAT GUY, stop plotting mass murder in your momma's basement and LEARN GAME!" I'm sure there are a couple out there doing things like that, but it is NOT the majority.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:19 PM
1

most massive guys tend to have average body fat. I can't speak for the whole world, but not in North America. Most guys (large and small) have body fat percentages above what is healthy (myself included).
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:05 PM
2

He'd spent years going to the gym every night Alright, I know this post is kinda off topic, but it's sad how little people know about fitness. If you go to the gym every night, you're not giving your body enough time to rest (even single body part isolation only really gets up to 5 day splits), and you won't be able to push yourself hard enough to see any progress. Even bodyweight programs like C25K only recommend working out (or rather running in C25K's case) 3 times a week.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:04 PM
1

I would like to point out that if you falsely sue someone for destruction of property, they can sue you for libel. The other side of that is that if someone fears that they'll get charged if the other person isn't found guilty could keep people from reporting real destruction of property.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 04:45 PM
1

ypu are either too dumb to read Oh please. I'm barely holding myself back. I want to point out your spelling errors so badly, but I have been nice so far. you know full well that i put "unless you can provide an argument actually connected to how things actually work around here" before i said the part you quoted No, actually, the part right before what I quoted was: "why are you crying about something that isn't happening?". The answer to that (as I have stated in some form or another in every …
/r/MensRights21/07/12 08:01 PM
1

"i'm not going to reply further since this is a colosal waste of time." Why do you keep responding? Do you enjoy causing yourself mental anguish? there is no extensive downvoting going on. again please argue based on reality. it's really hard to follow if i have to guess what's going on in your head. Yes. I said that. I'm talking about common disruptive tactics used by some of the less scrupulous parts of the internet. (As I made fairly clear and you have acknowledged multiple times)
/r/MensRights21/07/12 07:16 PM
1

so i guess you wrote this part for fun and really have no argument at all. nobody is reporting the bot they downvote it. If a group of people wanted to fuck with /r/MRSelfPostCopies , they would do it by mass reporting the bot. It's a common tactic used to take down youtube videos. Extensive downvoting and extensive reporting combine to "force the hands" of the site owners. I never said that people are reporting it right now, you said that I said that.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 07:08 PM
1

downvotes are not reports. Now you're just putting words in my mouth.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 06:34 PM
1

you realise that every subreddit has it's own mods right? Yes. And I'm sure if there are enough reports filed about one account, one of the 18 employees of reddit will look into it and possibly ban the account site wide. yes you could just skip 3 lines of text. that's not a god reason to have it at the top either. You could also get it to be automatically minimized. basicly there's no good reason for it to be at the top unless you think the mods are stupid. No. I just think that the site's emplo…
/r/MensRights21/07/12 05:57 PM
0

why should it be deleted? Report happy users and an overzealous reddit moderator? It happens A LOT on other sites. do you really think so little of the mods? No, I just think that the people that run reddit are human. the voteing system is to bring the worthwhille posts to the top that adds to the conversation. Of course. However reddit (like many other sites) will probably take an account's history into account when deciding whether or not to reinstate it if it is removed. the bot is not this a…
/r/MensRights21/07/12 05:31 PM
1

By it having a high upvote to post ratio it is less likely to be "accidentally" deleted (and if it is deleted, it will be easier to go through due process to bring it back). If it has a low (or even negative) upvote to post ratio though...
/r/MensRights21/07/12 05:16 PM
0

I say screw it. Let rightsbot have the top comment on every post. It's not hard to look past one line of text.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 01:19 PM
5

I wonder what percentage of guys get laid? Maybe 5%? Hard to say. I know guys (natural and "synthetic") who can have sex on any night they want simply by going out to a club. I also know guys who can get numbers and have sex in a couple days by going out to a bar or club. Then of course you've got the other end of the spectrum where there are guys who never "get lucky" despite going out to bars a lot, AND YOU CAN SPOT THEM. That guy with a hockey jersey and long hair (but not a nice flow) in the…
/r/MensRights21/07/12 01:17 PM
8

This is going to be a bit of a long post. Let's start with a bit of background on myself. I'm a bartender (and have been doing this for a little over a year), so I know my way around a bar. I work freelance, so I kinda hop around from bar to bar (depending on where needs help), and I take less shifts during the school year (September to April) than during the summer. I also am a VERY active social artist (fancy term for a PUA. Specific subset of PUAs with a specific mentality. We try to distance…
/r/MensRights21/07/12 01:04 PM
2

You mean like this?
/r/MensRights21/07/12 11:38 AM
5

Personally I prefer proper fake HTML tags ("</sarcasm>") instead of a bastardization of a "/sarcasm" emote, but that's just me.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 08:09 PM
1

The problem with that is that a lot of those programs only run at night.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:49 AM
20

So make it clear to her that you appreciate it. Go up to her after class and thank her for what she's doing, for guys and girls alike.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:48 AM
4

I'm glad it got funded, but I'm disappointed that it only barely got funded and some of these other things out there got HUGE amounts of money.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:24 AM
-1

The internet thinks otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 10:31 AM
6

That's just the thing, in some ways it's worse. (before anyone even get's started, I'm not saying in any way, shape, or form that mass shootings are good) If there's a mass shooting, the victims will can typically be grouped into three categories. People who were nearby, but not directly affected. They weren't injured and will be able to get on with their lives (at worst they'll need some counselling) People who are injured, but not killed. They'll have various problems thanks to their injuries,…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 12:10 PM
10

I agree with most of your post, but I would like to point one thing out. Because there is no equivalent to birth control for men. When male birth control makes it onto the market, then you can complain if it isn't covered. Condoms. Technically speaking the government could make it easier to get free condoms :P
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:01 PM
3

They might do slightly less bad as they would in the equivalent men's league That's not quite true. The top women's hockey team in the world (team Canada) often play against and are beaten by AAA midget (15/16/17 YO) and Bantam (13/14 YO) boys teams. Comparatively, team Canada's U20 Men's team would have almost no chance of beating team Canada's Olympic Men's team. In 2009/10 the Finnish women's Olympic team went 2-8 against Junior C teams (14-15 year olds) TL;DR Canada's Olympic women's hockey …
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:58 PM
5

Actually, muscle mass kinda does equal physical strength. The reason why a guy will on average be stronger than a girl with the same weight and height is because the amount of essential fat on a girls body will be a higher percentage of her weight. The range that is considered "professional athlete" or "body builder" for guys (4%-11%) would result in death for girls. Conversely, 25% body fat percentage is considered obese for guys, but on the low end of average for girls.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 07:36 PM
1

Yeah, it doesn't work out like that many times, and that needs fixing. However, that cannot be done at the expense of real victims of rape. Hence, feminist and mras need to acknowledge each others problems and work together to find a solution. Just bitching about who is worse off will not help anyone. Did I bitch about who is worse off? No. I stated that "Innocence until proven guilty." has kinda gone out the window, or else any she said-she said trials would never even make it to court. Also, I…
/r/MensRights25/06/12 09:21 AM
1

in the assange case it's innocent until proven guilty. And yet there are attempts to extradite him instead of simply doing an interview over the phone or having local police interview him, as historically has been standard procedure. The more disturbing thing (at least in my opinion) is that a lot of real rapes don't actually even make the front page anymore, silly because it does not involve famous individuals, who are more likely to get accused and where the media is more likely to report it. …
/r/MensRights25/06/12 09:14 AM
1

Also, please avoid distracting from the issue at hand: rape (and its existence, which you seem ademant to deny). Strawman argument. getthefuckoutofhere, nothingtoworryabout, and Eryemil weren't denying the existence of rape, they were pointing out that all the big rape cases in recent memory turned out to be false accusations. That is REALLY scary.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 08:33 AM
1

Can't comment on the Assange case; there is too little evidence (that I have read) in both directions Innocence until proven guilty. From a legal standpoint, you don't need any evidence to prove that you are innocent if the prosecution has no evidence proving that you are guilty. Then again, it doesn't seem to work out that way...
/r/MensRights25/06/12 08:31 AM
1

Think again
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:42 AM
1

Honestly, I haven't gone on a traditional date in so long that I can barely remember. For the last couple traditional dates that I went on it was all either dutch or her paying, and that was always just how it played out. Recently I've been just avoiding the whole dating structure altogether. I've just been doing stuff like inviting a girl to accompany as I go buy some bitters to restock my bartending supplies and stuff like that (and then "buying some bitters" turns into "exploring downtown", a…
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:30 AM
1

Yeah, it could have been written towards AFCs (Average Frustrated Chumps) just as easily, but that doesn't mean that it was a good article. Most AFCs' problems are that: They don't know how to hold a conversation They aren't starting conversations They don't know how to escalate sexually They aren't comfortable with all of the above The article doesn't really address any of that.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:00 AM
1

The point was the whole "head impacting the ground can cause problems that you can get sued for" thing.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 06:46 AM
2

In any case, tackling or pushing someone from behind with sufficient force is usually a pretty safe way to subdue someone safely Wasn't that (more or less) what Todd Bertuzzi did? And they had helmets on.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 06:40 AM
7

nametags Looks like she's being escorted off the premises of some building if anything.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 06:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter