TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CheapShotKO Archive

View 0 posts and 39 comments by CheapShotKO on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I am guessing "invisible." This is one of those "too funny to be true" stories.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/16 06:05 PM
6

Probably weren't locked away for 3 months with Asian parents though.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/16 06:01 PM
1

Probably because they're supported by their husbands gay people who need a woman and picked an easy one a real man would never marry, so they can bitch about the church forcing their unhappy lifestyle on them (even though they're the people choosing to be part of an organization that disavows homosexuality; the real-life equivalent of Dave Chapelle's skit on the black guy in the KKK)....who are busy at work, only to come home and allow a woman to physically abuse them, so they can yet again play…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/16 05:37 PM
8

The fact that everyone can admit it and laugh about it is what makes this sub great.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:29 PM
1

You still do not seem to grasp what defense is. It does not matter if someone is shot or killed. The context is what matters. A mote on a castle was considered defensive. Often they were full of things that could kill people; from spikes to oil that could be set aflame. Or people may drown in them. It did more than just "stop people from getting through." Same thing with the walls. They were built so that people could not easily pass them, and so that the people inside the walls had an advantage…
/r/MensRights10/10/15 12:10 PM
1

I like that you specifically tried a debate forum. I think that's why most women fail in big business; debate is a big part of negotiation (just recognizing how people communicate in business, not actually trying to debate, that's bad), and most women have no clue how to debate or negotiate because they don't recognize value. They also can't put a $ amount on how much their time is worth, or can't give realistic, data-backed estimations of how much money their projects will make. Basically, thin…
/r/MensRights18/09/15 09:12 AM
3

Welp, the comment section wasn't as exciting as I figured. She was wrong about "students of color" not having family, though. Makes it seem like all black kids are orphans. Not true from what I've seen.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 08:53 AM
3

Not diabolical. You are paying thousands of dollars. Diabolical would be tricking the teacher into making sexist remarks, then only presenting the remarks and not the tricking. That would be wrong. After that it is just being polite and getting them to stop. You should be learning skills that will earn you a living. If you are not learning those skills, college is wasting your time, and if someone were malicious, you would not want to put up with it. They are expected to have a certain level of …
/r/MensRights18/09/15 08:48 AM
1

As I said, it wasn't aimed at you specifically, so if you felt aggressed toward, t'was your own doing. I was speaking generally. Protection is defined as "keeping safe from harm," which includes counter-aggression. Knocking someone out or killing them before they can harm you keeps you safe from harm. I suppose you thought protection was wearing a full suit of medieval body armor, but I don't blame you; it's public education. Also, why would people with guns be afraid of people with guns? That b…
/r/MensRights18/09/15 08:41 AM
2

"YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN I WAS RAPED AS A CHILD!" - /r/feminism
/r/MensRights18/09/15 08:02 AM
1

Take a recorder (preferably video + audio, like a laptop camera you can flip away from you, or a small HD camcorder you can hide). Phone is MEH unless you have a lot of storage for video, like a tonnnn, and long battery life while recording, and you can hide it, since most teachers don't want students on their phones while in class. HOW TO GET AROUND THAT -- Get a rubber phone holder with a camera hole and make a "shoulder strap" for your phone. They will just assume it is a phone holder, not th…
/r/MensRights18/09/15 07:59 AM
-1

I like having a life-protecting machine, old bean. But I do agree about communication. There's one thing I always found hypocritical about gun lobbyists (not saying you are one, I am just speaking generally, so this is not aimed at you specifically); they say they are concerned for their safety, but don't want to move to states with more gun restriction laws, under the argument "Why should I have to move? They should have to move!" It wouldn't even take concern for my safety to make me move to a…
/r/MensRights18/09/15 05:51 AM
1

Why would they even want to know who the guy is? That's creepy. It's a political debate, not Twilight.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 05:32 AM
8

Not only that, but say this magically did happen. Next step would be, "Be sure to ask her at regular intervals during sex, just to make sure she doesn't change her mind, so then you can stop.....but by then it will be too late...you're now a rapist."
/r/MensRights18/09/15 05:23 AM
0

I would say no until the other party experiences the same ramifications.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 05:19 AM
16

Another recent double-standard not many people talk about is the movie The Boy Next Door. It was released recently, and it's basically statutory rape on the woman's part, but they use it to make her somehow look like the victim because he "goes crazy" and blackmails her with it. The hypocrisy is real. I can't remember the news story, but there was one about a female teacher who was arrested for statutory rape of a high school boy, and her excuse was basically, "But he said he loved me." And the …
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:42 PM
4

Fair points, but the article does not describe their relationship and whether or not she was overusing alcohol the entire time he knew her. Also, children are not a hindrance for people who like kids. It also seems the guy has enough money to provide for them, so they're not a hindrance in that aspect either. Personal opinion, but I think it's not nice to assume things about people without having met them. Especially since the article never even insinuates anything negative about the man (but ev…
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 12:45 AM
20

Ignores several aspects of the story. She was a model, so she traveled a lot. That is no reason for him to just assume she would cheat everywhere she went. The only reason for him to want to go to the Playboy Mansion would be to stare at other models, unless he didn't trust her, which would be more an indication of a lack of confidence in him. At least he was confidant. You can't claim you are the prize when you weren't invited to the party but want to go anyway; not only that, she was a model, …
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 11:21 PM
1

Sure thing. If you like that philosophy, if you haven't read it, I'd pick up this version of Sun Tzu's The Art of War. The commentary is very interesting, and it has other works other than Sun Tzu as well. I enjoy it because it compares The Art of War it to the Tao Te Ching (as well as other similar documents), and the author gives an interesting interpretation of the piece that you don't get from the document alone. Another good one is On Combat, The Psychology and Physiology of Deadly Conflict…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/15 09:10 AM
2

Playing devil's advocate here, but you're perpetuating several negative myths about men. 1st scenario: Your uber-popular high school guy was probably a football team captain, violent, strong asshole This makes it sound like violence and being obnoxious are good qualities for anyone. It makes it sound like every single high school "jock" (an all-inclusive label to begin with) is obnoxious and violent. When anyone looks at that, not only do they know it's immediately false (there are many athletic…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 08:20 PM
1

ROARRRR. A+.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 11:46 PM
10

Yeah, I lost interest in Marvel after they bastardized their heroes in Civil War. Not only made it downright communist-ish, but they're trying to sell shock more than substance now, just like every other major media outlet. It only grabs attention for so long, and it grabs the wrong type of attention. The "permanently lose me as a customer" type of attention. I had just re-subscribed to 5 books because Planet Hulk caught my interest, and Civil War took all of that interest and not only killed it…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 11:24 AM
2

Keep quiet with your "equality" and what have you! We're fighting a war!
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:58 AM
2

They can't. Because it makes no sense. They're just going to keep repeating that women aren't taken seriously in tech. But women are taken seriously in tech. The ones that deserve it. Just like Becky Hammon is taken seriously in sports. She deserves it.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:57 PM
6

Stop telling the pedos where to move.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 11:10 PM
-1

I have to disagree. Every male will want to date at some point. Everyone male will need to work at some point. Every male will get into some sort of conflict at some point (emotional or physical). The same is true for women. Men and women don't look for the the same things in regard to sexual partners though. Tons of studies have been done that, even in this shiney new age of equal rights, women are still more attracted to men that can provide for them. They're still attracted to security, and t…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:19 PM
-3

Yes they do. Again, dolls don't actually teach real parenting skills. One could only argue that those planned parenthood dolls do, but those are freaking machines, those aren't dolls, and they don't actually teach parenting skills, they just show young couples how annoying babies really are. They serve no useful purpose. Good parents are good parents regardless of the doll. Let me ask you; you ever seen a man go to planned parenthood and get one of those dolls by themselves? How many, exactly? H…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:42 AM
-14

I don't think it's our mindset at all. It is taken completely out of context. It makes the "average man," the one that doesn't want to be feminized with doesn't want his son to be feminized, the butt of the joke. People laugh at it because the perception is that he is doing exactly what he doesn't want his son to do; people chuckle because they're like "Ha, guess you're the 'feminine person' you don't want your son to be. Hypocrites are funny." But the thing is, he's not a hypocrite. Having and …
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:57 AM
3

Aside from the fact that he likely didn't ask for any of those things, and if he did, maybe they would have thought twice before being rough with him. He could have also been asked to be searched at a police station after he spoke with a lawyer, that way he would still be in custody (couldn't harm anyone) but would still have his rights.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 12:21 AM
-12

Greetings. I've learned a trick to getting a good gal. Learn a skill that feminists have labeled "below" them, such as cooking or any type of craft. There are manly crafts out there, and cooking is truly a unisex job (a lot of chefs are male). But the pretend feminists won't touch cooking with a 10 foot pole. It harkens to their days as a socially-victimized individual; after all, why should cooking be a woman's job? The shameeeee! There are a few feminazis here and there, but by and large, it i…
/r/MensRights20/12/13 02:25 PM
1

The problem is, you just defeated your own argument by saying "plenty of non-feminists do the same." I'm assuming you are referring to humanity as a whole, which feminists are a part of, which means they aren't magically excluded from simply because they are feminists. However, the difference is, the general populace does not support network set up to publicly belittle people who oppose their views. They even belittle people that do support them, whenever they feel like. As an example, I'm sure …
/r/MensRights03/12/13 01:31 PM
1

But you were the one that agreed with my claim by changing your linguistics.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 01:14 PM
1

I didn't say that at all, I said I can't be exaggerate, which is what you said. You didn't say reinforced. They are two entirely different words with entirely different meanings.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 11:50 PM
1

But that's the thing, I think you misunderstand me. I don't think that, in the nature we are discussing, that nature can be exaggerated. To be clear, to exaggerate is to: ...represent as greater than is actually the case; overstate: In the case of biology, it cannot be exaggerated, because the "actual case" is everything biological. The closest possible thing to an exaggeration would be a previously unfound limit, which once it was discovered, would be included in the definition of the organism'…
/r/MensRights01/12/13 09:54 AM
1

Again, you are incorrect. And yet again, for the second time, I point you to the actual topic you are in that is being discussed. The one where someone lied, created a fake victim (themselves), in order to get sympathy. No one has problems with real victims. Even if she did not experience something herself, but she was a candidate for victimhood, and was vocal in her concern for change, that would have been acceptable. For example; women don't get paid as much in business. While I have my own be…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 07:56 PM
1

Would you care to elaborate? I've not seen evidence of cultural inflammation exceeding individual or group biological capacity. I don't believe that is possible, as exceeding it would simply add more to the thing's biological definition. Perhaps an increase in tendency, but it still does not exceed a natural limitation; if it did, it would not be a natural limitation.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 07:46 PM
2

I wouldn't call it a sanctity so much as a reflex; people's automatic application of the golden rule. "If it was me, what would I want to happen?" The existence of mirror neurons in the brain would support this; people, to an extent, experience others' emotions just by seeing them or hearing about them (as in poetry and literature). When people see a victim, it isn't so much a feeling of sanctity as it is a feeling that they've been victimized themselves. Those empathetic feelings lead to a sens…
/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:34 PM
1

That's the thing though, it doesn't happen all the time. It happens with very few social groups. You even ridiculously mentioned, "Go into any Catholic church and look at who is on the cross." The entire theology is that the "person" on the cross was an omnipotent being that chose to be there; the idea of a "victim" in that scenario is sheer stupidity. I am not saying anyone has to believe it, but arguing that it is victim worship from the worshiper's point of view is the most philosophically un…
/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:23 PM
5

I don't think it's worship, and I don't think the problem is real victims. They are creating victims, and people associate real victims with these fake victims. That is why people insult and are annoyed with modern feminism. IMHO, early feminists would not join a modern feminist party, because from what I've read, early feminists were intellectuals.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 10:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter