CheesyJame Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-5	Stephen Graham issues warning to parents after Netflix’s Adolescence I was with you until that last line. What exactly do you mean by feminization of education, work, and culture? Does that just mean more women in those spheres? Bc that's not feminization, that's egalitarianism. Boys are falling behind in education, but that's not because girls are succeeding. Do you mean devaluation of masculinity? Bc you can definitely make an argument for that, but I wouldn't call it feminization, I'd call it devaluation of masculinity.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	19/03/25 02:20 PM
6	A question for the women of this sub. You'd think, but their immediate reaction to me sensibly stating my case was to mock me for being sensitive? Very weird. Maybe I should post screenshots of the convo on here and elsewhere to put them on blast.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	10/03/25 01:34 AM
9	A question for the women of this sub. It was for calling out Pizzacake for being misandrist 😅 was there a comic calling out misandry? I'd love to see it!	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	10/03/25 01:32 AM
50	A question for the women of this sub. Thank you for the well-wishes! Yes I do advocate for men, no I haven't been called a pick-me (but have been banned from a r/comics bc "misandry doesn't exist"), and you didn't ask but I identify as a feminist. I came to this sub to hear other perspectives, ones I agree with and ones I don't. All are valuable.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	08/03/25 09:24 PM
-16	JD Vance: "Don't allow this broken culture to send you a message that you're a bad person because you're a man" There are plenty of feminists who also say "you aren't evil or broken for being a man" but y'all don't want to talk about that either.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/02/25 03:34 PM
3	New study falsely claims people only allow bodily autonomy for men. What are your thoughts? They didn't say women have greater restrictions, they said when women are restricted it is more likely to be based on moral/purity arguments vs other types of arguments. And the second argument was based on toplessness bc that was what they study they reviewed focused on. That's just a natural limitation of research, you pick a study to review or critique and your arguments can only extend as far as the scope of that study. The fact that the study didn't have a larger scope isn't sexism, it's ju…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	18/02/25 03:59 PM
7	New study falsely claims people only allow bodily autonomy for men. What are your thoughts? I believe they are saying that when men's bodily autonomy is restricted the appeal is made based on other justifications, which of course does not mean that those "justifications" are valid. For example, when people argue for RIC they mostly argue from a (misinformed, incorrect) medical standpoint, and when they argue conscription they argue from a social benefit/national defense standpoint, which is also insufficient justification. Just because the arguments come from different places doesn't m…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	18/02/25 03:55 PM
11	New study falsely claims people only allow bodily autonomy for men. What are your thoughts? "Our research fills this gap by examining whether bodily autonomy is seen as more of a moral issue when it pertains to women's bodies than when it pertains to men's bodies and whether moral arguments are used more in the context of women's bodies compared to men's bodies. In other words, are women's bodies moralized more than men's bodies? In two pre-registered studies, we investigate this question across multiple contexts in which morality could, in theory, be applied equally to women's and men…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	18/02/25 03:50 PM
9	New study falsely claims people only allow bodily autonomy for men. What are your thoughts? No dispute there. And you could certainly take issue with other things in the study depending on your sociological framework. Just irks me when people misrepresent findings to dismiss them.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	18/02/25 03:42 PM
32	New study falsely claims people only allow bodily autonomy for men. What are your thoughts? OP's summary is incorrect. The abstract does not, in fact, claim that bodily autonomy only exists for men, or even that bodily autonomy is lopsided between the sexes. It merely claims that when arguing about bodily autonomy for men vs women, people are more likely to draw on moral arguments with regards to women than with regards to men. Nowhere does it claim that people do not argue against men's bodily autonomy. From the abstract: "...we show that people draw more strongly on morality when jus…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	18/02/25 03:14 PM
11	FD Signifer Makes a 28 Minute Video attacking Abuse Victim Johnny Depp My bad, I meant during the trial, not before. Before the trial he was pretty much disgraced, just on her accusations without legal proof, which is untenable. He was massively supported during and after the trial, but definitely suffered more from her accusations than she did from falsely accusing. Thanks for your reply, I'm here to learn so it helps	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	14/10/24 08:34 PM
11	FD Signifer Makes a 28 Minute Video attacking Abuse Victim Johnny Depp See I never knew that about Winehouse. Definitely seems like media are quicker to gloss over abuse by women. Unless they become unpopular. Then all bets are off, for any gender.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	14/10/24 08:31 PM
-1	FD Signifer Makes a 28 Minute Video attacking Abuse Victim Johnny Depp Geez buddy you sure have a bone to pick here. You missed where I also replied to someone saying he hadn't abused her and said the same? Notably I didn't agree with either, just thanked them for the info? Thats because nobody's reddit comment can stand in for facts, and when you have differing replies that means you have to find another source. I didn't "take the first message that aligns" with me. It just looks like there are conflicting sources here.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	14/10/24 08:22 PM
-8	FD Signifer Makes a 28 Minute Video attacking Abuse Victim Johnny Depp See I thought I had read something about that, that's why I asked. His US case didn't exonerate him of anything, though media response acted as though it did.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	14/10/24 08:06 PM
-1	FD Signifer Makes a 28 Minute Video attacking Abuse Victim Johnny Depp You're taking my statements about general sentiment as I saw it expresses across social media and applying them to your personal stance; I'm not replying to your personal stance. You didn't discuss or imply that he was a hero, but the wider public view did (again, as I encountered it, which granted is going to be a little different for different people according to what spaces they frequent). I don't frequent feminist or women-dominated online spaces so I wouldn't know if the sentiment there was…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	14/10/24 08:04 PM
16	FD Signifer Makes a 28 Minute Video attacking Abuse Victim Johnny Depp No I get that, I agree. I mean its like how people tried to bring up George Floyd having a criminal history, as if that mattered. I ask bc its one thing to say "this person is a victim and deserves justice" and its another to say "this person is a Rockstar and an angel and let's glorify them." Which I think happened a bit with Depp.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	14/10/24 06:33 PM
7	FD Signifer Makes a 28 Minute Video attacking Abuse Victim Johnny Depp I think you're right, I must've misremembered. Thanks!	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	14/10/24 06:29 PM
-4	FD Signifer Makes a 28 Minute Video attacking Abuse Victim Johnny Depp I'm not stating nor implying "they're both bad," or that being an imperfect victim makes you unworthy of sympathy and justice. Why I asked the question is because of the implications that one party is perfectly innocent and one party is perfectly evil. That is rarely the case, but most of the time, it's irrelevant. What a victim has done in other times or places has no bearing on whether or not they deserve justice, full-stop. Let there be no confusion on my stance about that. What I am question…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	14/10/24 06:29 PM
30	FD Signifer Makes a 28 Minute Video attacking Abuse Victim Johnny Depp This is a genuine question, so don't take this as a criticism, but wasn't it that they had both perpetrated abuse? Her to a much greater extent, and more heinously, as the trial showed, this is not support of that Turd woman, but my understanding had been that the trial also turned up bad behavior on his part. Also, I think Depp was far and away the most supported across all sectors and political affiliations. Like, Amber Heard was universally hated throughout that whole thing. Sure, there are s…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	14/10/24 06:04 PM
7	I hate how casual or normalize it is, for people to expect most men to automatically have fetishes about races, sexual orientations, etc. I find it gross in general for people to project these beliefs on any race, kinda like the white men x Asian women stereotype. Seems like its more accepted to make these kinds of assumptions towards men. The women liking BBC stereotype is very much alive and kicking, tho. Like all things, depends on the people around you, but especially among younger women it's common to joke about women thirsting for black men or cheating on their bfs with black men. Which I guess furthers the stereotype of bla…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/09/24 07:33 PM
2	Why is agency-denying language about women becoming pregnant so common? I want to discuss this, as well as its relationship to denial of men's reproductive rights That makes sense, it's hard to understand the context of a conversation from just one quote. I wasn't intending to criticize your interpretation, just that the idea of it not being consensual would not have occurred to me from that phrasing. For what it's worth, I have also used "we are pregnant" or "we are due X date" when I've been pregnant, my point is just that 1) saying only the woman is pregnant is not, imo, an expression of sexism, just a description of medical fact 2) "we" language aroun…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/07/24 11:22 PM
7	Why is agency-denying language about women becoming pregnant so common? I want to discuss this, as well as its relationship to denial of men's reproductive rights People phrase things the way your MIL did when they weren't planning or trying get pregnant, therefore it was a surprise, not because they don't know how pregnancy happens or weren't using birth control (fails all the time) or because they're trying to deny themselves agency. Maybe it's just me, but her phrase as you quoted it doesn't sound like she was saying she was passive. Just that she didn't expect to become pregnant. People tend to use phrases such as "he/she fucked him/her" when the sex …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/07/24 09:28 PM
2	Is there actually a manosphere? Sure there is. In fact, there many terms that have been in circulation for awhile. "Mommy blogger," "momtok," "SJW," "femminazi," "girl boss," all refer to toxic female created, female centered content and thought	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	26/07/24 12:44 AM