TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cheeto_McBeeto Archive

View 1 post and 16 comments by Cheeto_McBeeto on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
63

HumourCheeto_McBeeto/r/MensRights01/08/24 07:17 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I don't and never have. Society needs men, women need men, but times have changed and women have a lot more power now and don't need men as much as they used to. I think a lot of men have lost their way and become soft also. It's a constant battle as a man in today's first world to not let yourself get soft. I think that's half our problem.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 06:13 PM
-3

People are throwing reason out the window for the sake of "standing for something" The social, medical, psychological, financial risks all need to be weighed by the family, when it comes to elective surgical procedures for minors. Conjoined twins is another example. But again, to stress, NONE of these weigh equally or categorically next to transgender "care"/mutilation.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:18 PM
-11

There really arent any. I'm not a proponent of male circumcision, I'm neutral. I think the rhetoric is overblown and it opens up a can of worms. What about cosmetic surgery for birth "defects" like hemangiomas or mild cleft lip? What about polydactyly? Or plagiocephaly? If an infant has a flat head do we leave them like that for life when there are no medical "benefits" to wearing cranial orthotics? Do we leave them like that for life because they cant consent? Not a black and white subject.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:15 PM
-2

No need to be a prick just because you disagree. Circumcision is and has always been an elective procedure. Like ANY surgical procedure, there are risks. The problem is the waters are muddied by people's degeneracy and ideology. If we as a society are going to ban neonatal circumcision, then we should also ban ANY elective procedure in non-consenting minors where the potential benefits do not justify the risk.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 02:43 PM
-7

Show me some credible statistics on infant mortality directly attributable to circumcision. I have yet to find any in the last hour of searching. Median morbidity rate is estimated about 1-1.5%....fairly acceptable for a medical procedure. Mortality does happen, but it is often associated with other neonatal comorbidities. I can see a case being made for forbidding elective circumcision in minors. The benefits are probably not high enough to justify the risks, even though small when performed by…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 02:37 PM
8

it's reddit...not surprised at all. Degeneracy, misandry, and far-left insanity. Put another way: "I wasnt ready to be a parent so I killed my unborn child. I didnt tell the father. Please affirm me." Reddit to the rescue.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 02:08 PM
-32

This over the top circumcision rhetoric has to stop. Boys---for the most part---arent having lifelong adverse outcomes from circumcision. It does have medical benefits. As a medical provider I can tell you I see WAY more men with issues related to foreskin than issues related to circumcision revision. But it takes attention away from the real insanity of reassigning a child's gender, and of course abortion, the greatest evil of all.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 01:54 PM
-3

"A baby boy dies every three days from circumcision in America" Complete and utter bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 12:44 PM
5

It's crazy. I can think of WAYYYY more bad-faith, depraved, or outright hateful subreddits I've come across and would rather forget. This place has been respectful, and frankly, based.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 07:35 PM
8

I'm def good, just some random post from a sub I forgot I was even subscribed to.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 07:31 PM
8

I could care less, just surprised this could actually happen. I know many mainstream reddits have been banning anyone who even deviates a inch from the status quo ideology for years, but auto-banning someone for just being subscribed? That's next-level discrimination. Of all the seriously depraved places on reddit they're going to pick on men's rights?
/r/MensRights01/08/24 07:30 PM
1

I went through this. My wife had a complicated pregnancy and a very scary birth. Our son was in the NICU for 2 months. She had bad postpartum anxiety and I was very depressed for a time after we brought him home. It's a big change with a lot to process for men too.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 07:23 PM
6

This belief has been a staple of the manosphere for decades. And I think there is some truth to it. But also some romanticism and fallacy. A few points: The American woman attitude is indeed toxic but not unique to the US. In Europe, Australia, parts of South America, it is nearly as bad. You are more likely to find traditional, demure, less acrimonious women in poorer and more conservative countries, and in communities of devoutly religious. Believe it or not there ARE women like this here...bu…
/r/MensRights30/07/24 12:55 PM
1

Men have been saying this for decades in red pill circles. I don't think it's exclusively a female thing, although women are usually the ones ending relationships. There are many reasons, but the overarching issue here is that MOST people today, especially younger people, have an unrealistic expectation of what a real relationship is like. Love primarily is about the sacrifice of self for the good of another. People just do not understand that. Our culture teaches us the opposite. MY feelings, M…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 02:53 PM
1

100% the most mature and wise answer.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 02:39 PM
3

By acknowledging the monster in other women, they implicitly have to confront the monster in themselves, or be backed into a corner at a later date. Basically they prefer outcomes that benefit women categorically, because it's safer for them.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 05:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter