TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ChicagoRunner Archive

View 1 post and 227 comments by ChicagoRunner on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

Still racism
/r/MensRights12/04/17 01:23 PM
1

That's called feminism actually.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 01:34 PM
1

Youre insane. A man beheaded another man you psycho
/r/MensRights04/11/16 06:26 PM
-8

Why the fuck would you go to an interview then hit on office bitches?
/r/seduction30/09/16 06:41 PM
3

They're simply saying that while wrong and hypocritical, the power dynamics are different and therefore make the articles not analogous.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 10:54 PM
1

But arent you guys against women in combat arms and industrial jobs? In any case our society does not support women joining those roles and teaches girls at a young age that they shouldnt participate in those jobs.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:23 PM
-5

I pick up girls without being a systemic creep about it. Why dont you post your resume of 10 years experience and your credentials while you're at it?
/r/seduction08/07/16 04:26 AM
8

She's just trying to get laid same as 90% of this subreddit. Doesn't make her a psycho
/r/seduction08/07/16 04:05 AM
4

Sounds like a 500 days of summer sitch
/r/seduction08/07/16 04:04 AM
29

He obviously didnt say it like how he wrote it dude...
/r/seduction08/07/16 04:01 AM
0

Are you serious?
/r/MensRights04/07/16 08:53 PM
1

She wanted to hurt a man so she killed two women close to him. She was so mad at him she killed two women. That's about as clear as any objectification as youre going to get.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 01:29 PM
1

So a woman killed two women to make a man angry. A woman used two women as objects to anger a man. A woman saw two women as not people, but mere means to make a man angry. Clearly this woman valued the man's life more than the lives of two women if she killed two women to make one man angry, no? So how is this in any way the fault of a feminist? It is literally contradictory of a feminist to dehumanize women to the point of being simple meat bag tools to be used to anger a man. Where does "femin…
/r/MensRights29/06/16 10:56 PM
1

Two women dead. And you complain about how this is injustice to men. Not the dead women. You're insane
/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:26 PM
1

Youre worried about the husband and two women are dead. And youre using their death to further an agenda. Youre trash. Show some respect.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 04:19 PM
0

Ive never seen a feminist refer to themselves as nazis. I think it's just you guys. Guarantee the shooter in this situation is not a feminist or a nazi for that matter. You guys are crazy that you'll take the murder of two women and make it about men.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 03:40 PM
2

Now youre making shit up and adding the word nazi. Ooooohhhh scary femnazis!
/r/MensRights29/06/16 03:01 PM
-3

This sub is crazy. You're blaming feminists for a woman killing other women. Pretty sure that is against feminism at a very basic level. Then you guys make the murder of two women about men! About you!
/r/MensRights29/06/16 01:36 PM
4

Girl makes post about how societal pressures of masculinity don't make sense, MRAs hate her anyways. You guys are fucking dumb
/r/MensRights24/06/16 01:22 PM
2

You didnt read what i said
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:44 AM
2

Respect.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 11:23 PM
9

What do you think should happen if a woman doesn't want it but the man does?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 08:54 PM
2

Except it isn't molestation. It was consentual. Sooo no. I do not agree.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 07:03 PM
1

No. It's not rape. The guy was 17. And no one should videotape sex without consent. That is fucked up and sick.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 06:46 PM
-6

I agree. Which then means the "victim" whom videotaped it is clearly in the wrong. We lived in a fucked up society where this 17 year old is considered a victim.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 02:18 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights30/12/15 07:21 PM
0

It is simply illogical that most civilian casualties in war would be men. Both stats are cherry picked.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 02:49 PM
1

Whoosh. I'm saying that the parameters chosen create a dishonest picture of the reality for war time deaths between men and women. A feminist could easily say, "female privilege, huh? Then why are the most innocent casualties of war women and not men? Some privilege." The pie chart is arbitrary and several of the stats are cherry picked to make it appear as men are at a societal disadvantage in a matriarchal world.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 11:51 PM
2

I mean, the point is that the flip side of the coin is "more women are civilian casualties of war." It can even be extrapolated to "more women are innocent civilian casualties of war caused by men in power." That can literally be used as an argument for why women are under privileged in society today and throughout history. It literally uses the same logic as the original post. And that perspective has just as much merit, dare i say more about proving a point about gender privilege. This subredd…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:20 AM
1

My point is that combat deaths of war, and civilian deaths of war is an arbitrary thing. Death from war is death from war. The stat makes it appear as if war deaths are only men.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 07:03 PM
-2

It isnt confusing. But death is death in war, so that's an arbitrary stat.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 06:00 PM
-7

I never said that. I said the pie chart was a cherry picked stat that makes it appear men account for 99% of deaths in war. When accounting for all casualties, the rate between men and women is almost certainly similar. Then you need to consider that almost all casualties of war are caused by men.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 05:36 PM
-6

The point is that war deaths of women to men is substantial to both genders. So the stat in the pie chart is cherry picked.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 05:14 PM
-9

But men are the literal cause of that disparity right now as they have excluded women from those roles. Also the millions of women who have died in war as civilians don't count? Pretty sure WWII saw more deaths to civilians than soldiers. Just saying that stat is kind of loaded and narrowminded.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:17 PM

Isn't it primarily men who have kept women out of the military? Even in this sub people get angry about the thought of women in combat MOS-es. Also, you fail to consider women casualties of war as civilians. Which is a significant amount.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 02:49 PM
25

Can you provide your sources?
/r/MensRights28/12/15 02:38 PM
-1

Do people actually believe this is a "feminist conspiracy"?
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:11 PM
2

Look, i would use a joking tone to take that as an insult, and then dismiss it in front of them. It'll leave an imprint of you in their head. If all else fails, you still have your respect.
/r/seduction21/10/15 01:32 PM
2

Wait... the average is 7?
/r/seduction05/10/15 01:21 PM
-35

I think the point is that nadal wasn't asked to twirl.... seriously? Why is this hard?
/r/MensRights14/09/15 01:25 PM
1

Why would they do that though?
/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:14 PM
-2

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. You are an artifact of the point i made.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:09 PM
-12

Im baffled by how hypocritical this subreddit is. Several hundred times a day users in this subreddit misappropriate feminism and what it is to be circlejerked and upvoted. Mind boggling.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 12:03 PM
1

It's a women's studies class. Jesus this subreddit is dumb as hell. Like, what the fuck do they think would happen?
/r/MensRights01/09/15 11:52 AM
2

Probably because this never happened.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 05:26 AM
1

Can someone control f my screenname? Im on mobile
/r/MensRights30/07/15 03:44 AM
0

Dude you literally made reference to what patriarchy is in your first post. I just put the name to it.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 06:44 AM
-1

You spew something about belief system that gives "alphas" power (it has a name already.... patriarchy) and then complain about "alphas" getting laid by "feminists" who in your mind only fuck patriarchal assholes and hate(?) "betas"
/r/MensRights28/07/15 12:28 AM
-2

Whoa dude. Sounds like you have a lot of issues going on and youre blaming women for it. That system you're talking about, the one that puts lots of men at a disadvantage, is the same system feminists want to undermine. Feminists call it "patriarchy."
/r/MensRights28/07/15 12:06 AM
-2

You're right. You know feminist websites. I'm so blind. Never mind it's intellectually inconsistent with the feminist desire to undermine patriarchy and concepts of masculinity that help one gain power within a patriarchal system. Yup, it's all the "betas" feminists are after. They just loooooove "alpha" males.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:51 PM
-7

You know if anything, feminsts don't like the men who are alpha in society's current definition of masculinity. This subreddit is mind boggling to me sometimes.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 01:07 PM
1

It means he thought she was incredibly attractive but not a playboy bunny
/r/seduction13/07/15 01:16 PM
1

It is almost as morally wrong. Don't mince my words.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:23 PM
-4

What are you talking about? Are you responding to what I wrote? Because if you are, it sure as hell makes no sense. You come across as a foaming at the mouth psycho. Babbling about things I didn't even say. Just reading anything how you want to in order to get angry.... just woah dude.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 04:59 AM
-5

Regardless of what any of you think about what happened, I hope none of you took pleasure out of the video or jacked off to a depiction of sexual violence. Because getting pleasure out of rape is nearly (if not) as bad as rape itself.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:25 AM
-1

This sub is fucking crazy. If there's anything feminists love, it's proper consent with sex. You guys are all circlejerking over a boogieman that doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 10:11 PM
-2

Feminists are all about creating a culture of consent. I don't know any feminists that would call a man a pig for having sex with a woman who ASKED. Jesus fucking christ, this subreddit is so delusional sometimes.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 08:06 PM
-11

Point to one feminist author that labels a man as a pig for having obviously CONSENTUAL sex. This fucking subreddit sometimes
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:27 PM
-9

Explain how this has anything to do with feminism
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:04 PM
0

No, but I bet you spent hours on that shitty comeback.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:30 AM
-40

No. But ths subreddit acts like sexism only exists if it's against men. And that if that's the case, it's the worst. But it will argue until the end of the universe, "statistics show that sexism against women is a false narrative and feminists are therefore bitches."
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:50 AM
-27

"Sexism at it's best, the sexism against me!"
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:29 AM
-36

How I imagine this subreddit: This is the worst kind of sexism! The kind against ME!
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:15 AM
0

Yeah, it was a ranting tirade about feminism. Feminism didn't rape you, or do anything to you. You're being a psycho.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:30 PM
-8

So you recact to feminists? Feminists are such bitches! Caring about women's issue! Ill show those dumb bitches! Men! Men! Men! Feminists are dumb bitches because they don't care about men but focus on women's issues!!!!! How dare a women's movement do that! Like, no shit dude. Why not form your own opinion instead of angrily reacting to feminists caring about feminist issues? It's like your instinct is to make it about you.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:07 AM
-7

Feminists are not upset that mra's don't care about feminist issues. Your whole post is legit stupid.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 12:57 AM
-7

Man is anti-feminist, rants and raves about hating feminists.... same man upset feminists don't care about him.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 12:38 AM
0

Yeah. Women just aren't mentally capable to do what men do.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 12:08 AM
0

I respect women as individuals who make their own choices. Not as peoperty of men in relationships.
/r/seduction03/04/15 03:53 PM
-3

Saying you can't flirt with someone because she is with a man is implying the man matters more than the grown woman making her iwn fucking choices. She isn't her boyfriend's property.
/r/seduction03/04/15 01:47 PM
-7

Women aren't property. This subreddit is disgusting.
/r/seduction03/04/15 01:13 PM
1

Huh?
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:12 PM
3

How dare someone raise awareness for heart disease in women. THAT SEXIST PIG ASSHOLE BITCH!!!!!!
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:10 PM
-7

Ironic that this subreddit is calling out ad hominem tactics.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 10:59 PM
1

This has nothing to do with men's rights. Might as well call this subreddit r/antifeminist because that's all it is. It has nothing original to contribute to any conversation. All it does is react to what feminists do even when it doesn't involve men.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 01:07 AM
-8

Why do you care?
/r/MensRights23/03/15 01:04 PM
-18

This thread is rambling on about feminists but it was typically men who shamed other men so idk why this sub has a fascination with feminists when typically it's man on man injustice.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 06:09 PM
-19

They were shamed by other men.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:18 PM
1

Fight against the patriarchal gender roles that define women as better suited for parenthood!!!!
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:04 PM
-1

Hiw is that my most recent submission?
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:05 PM
-2

Lol, kind of pathetic you went tjrough my history. I have nothing to hide, just pathetic of you
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:29 PM
-81

Men outraged at safe space for women in a typically male dominated area! OUTRAGE!!!!
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:19 AM
0

Have game without being ass?
/r/seduction01/02/15 03:19 PM
1

My girlfriend and I are both feminists. We jave sex A LOT
/r/seduction31/01/15 10:22 PM
0

You think there is some magical place called "no fat chicks allowed" to get your game on. You're a jackass and an idiot. How many times do you say "bro" on the daily?
/r/seduction31/01/15 08:01 PM
-1

That isn't why he's a douche. Nice straw man though. Ironic to bring up "logic"....
/r/seduction31/01/15 02:57 PM
-6

At any bar there will be people of all sizes. You sound like a douche.
/r/seduction30/01/15 11:56 PM
-1

You're pretty anti feminist. And youre in such denial, youre telling an actual feminist what feminism is.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:03 PM
-4

"Feminism isnt about undermining patriarchy"..... holy shit. Lol this sub is crazy. An anti-feminist is going to tell a feminist what feminists want. Beyond delusional.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:47 AM
-3

You missed the concept of men mocking other men that they perceive to not be masculine. It's a power move in patriarchal epistemology. By those men mocking another man through challenges to his masculinity, they in turn raise their social status. Feminism undermines patriarchy. A feminist man would never mock another man's perceived masculinity as a power move in order to raise their own social status. In our society this happens all the time. Just look at every single high school in America.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:26 AM
-3

Lol, I'm not a woman. And men bully other men all the time for perceptions of not meeting their societal expectation of what it means to be a man. Men who are victims of this from other men benefit from feminism because feminists don't have those shallow expectations of what it means to be a man.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:56 AM
-5

If femnism is about undermining patriarchy, which is inherently male dominance, then for a man to be a feminist, he would understand that it is about women putting themselves first in order to raise their gender to equal status. A man cannot be a feminist, and then put men first, it is illogical. Men may be feminists for many empathic reasons, and practical. For example, many men are hurt by patriarchy and patriarchal values. Like a woman who is mentally unfit gets full custody of children in a …
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:25 AM
-4

Lol, this subreddit has no critical thinking skills
/r/MensRights28/01/15 12:02 AM
-16

This subreddit is insane.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:02 AM
1

Whoosh!
/r/MensRights22/01/15 10:27 PM
1

HOW DARE HE SAY THAT!
/r/MensRights21/01/15 05:24 PM
-7

Lol. I know, brah
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:46 AM
-6

Whoosh. This subreddit is hilarious
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:04 AM
-5

I feel bad for you
/r/MensRights02/01/15 05:05 PM
-7

I'll tell you what it isn't. A conspiracy for women's survival. I can't encompass the history of marriage in a reddit comment. But I know that, bc I studied history and have done historical analysis and original research. You made a substantial claim. Any Ph. Dl in history would tear you apart. Hell, if I took time out I could compile a research paper and do it. The thing is, I have a iob and a life now. You have a fucked up mindset. I feel bad for you. Also, I'd like to point out that you are t…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:03 PM
-11

There is not a single historian who would agree with this point. You're so sure of yourself that you think your revisionist history is reality. And what's even more disturbing is the amount of upvotes you received.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 01:57 PM
2

Where I'm at, almost all guys have close cuts like that.
/r/seduction21/12/14 11:38 PM
3

So a latino shape up is a hair cut? I have fades like that and im not latino
/r/seduction21/12/14 09:56 PM
10

Wtf is that?
/r/seduction21/12/14 06:10 PM
1

That's not what I said. You hear what you want to hear. I won't reexplain it bc you can revisit it yourself. Basically.... whoosh
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:17 PM
2

The men were getting revnege on the pakistani military. I don't kniw if you realize, but they are at war.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 08:15 PM
1

Playing dumb. Good strategy. Or is that how you go through life?
/r/MensRights17/12/14 06:41 PM
1

Yeah. The men were getting revenge. They killed boys instead. That tells you those men thought the boys were of more value. Those men live in a culture where women are below them. Neutral gender is often synonymous with male. Which is why you don't often see men explicitly stated. It's the same reason why minorities often have their race disclosed whereas white people generally do not. I don't understand why you're coming at me. Everything I said is rather simple to understand.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 06:30 PM
2

I spelled everything out very neatly in my original post. It seems to have gone over your head bc it did not do anything you're claiming it is doing.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 05:37 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights17/12/14 05:04 PM
1

Strawman. I said it was a symptom of a male dominated society.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 04:42 PM
0

The language you used was different because you thought I was female. Acknowledging you treated me different because you thought I was a woman doesn't make me the asshole. To make strides for equality, you need to address inequality. You calling me a twat and trying to shut me down because you thought I was a woman is inequality on your part.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 04:07 PM
0

No one is adding double standards. And wow, so that's how you talk to women, huh? I am a male US soldier, so it's always interesting to see first hand what women have to deal with if they speak up. You are an embarrassment.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:05 PM
1

I already explained it. Revenge was a huge motive. If boys are valued over girls, who would they target to get revenge? Boys. If girls are not seen as capable by men or as a potential threat, who would you kill? Boys. They view girls as sheep and boys as tiger cubs. If that's how you perceive them, who would you target? Those two aspects are symptoms of male dominance, which is why male dominance clearly hurts men as well as women. Which is why injustices done to men through patriarchal means ha…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:54 PM
1

That's a ridiculous strawman. The concept is that this act is a symptom of male dominance and patriarchy. And how is anything I wrote "evil"? I explained simple concepts of how the male killers acted within patriarchy.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:41 PM
-2

Whoosh
/r/MensRights17/12/14 05:55 AM
-5

I already addressed it in my other comment and it has nothing to do with oppressing men. It's a symptom of male dominance.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:03 AM
-1

Yeah, the media makes it a point to identify female victims because neutral gender subconsciously means men. If anything, women should be pissed that their gender is so incredibly widespread thought of as "the other" to the extent that they aren't people, they are female.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:11 AM
-8

No comments in here pointing out that all the killers were men. Edit: also, since we live in a male dominated world, men are the default as people. They don't need to be pointed out as male, our mind is already conditioned to think that neautral gender means male. It's a symptom of a male-centric world, not oppression of men. Victims identified as women are because they are thought of as "other." Female children werent targeted for murder because the men who committed the attacks see women as he…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 01:00 AM
0

Just dont rape anyone.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 01:42 PM
0

You may end up in jail some day.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 03:13 AM
0

Do you not get it? The prompt says they both are not equally intoxicated. Which is the point.... One is drunk and the other is tipsy.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 01:21 AM
-1

One is drunk, the other is tipsy. Clearly says it in the prompt.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 09:13 PM
-1

The point of the brief question is that they are not on the same level and that the female is more drunk whereas the guy is tipsy. It isn't ambiguous at all.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 08:42 PM
-6

Wow, I have no idea what that ramble was. Sorry dude. Just dont initiate sex with people clearly more intoxicated than you and dont have sex with people who don't give outright consent. That doesn't infringe on your rights as a man.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 08:16 PM
-16

It gave a scenario of a tipsy person having nonconsenting sex with a drunk person. Not only that, that scenario expressed is rampant across campuses around the world. There is no problem with the question.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:08 PM
-16

Yeah, and every one of those guys who downvoted has probably said on so many occasions, "I'm not drunk, I'm just tipsy!" They all clearly understand the concept the question in the op was getting at.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:55 PM
-22

The question clearly establishes that the girl was drunk. Guys, dont fuck drunk girls without consent. John was tipsy, but he was not drunk. Big fucking difference. Why is it "men's rights" to be upset about not being able to fuck drunk girls who are more intoxicated than you and didn't consent? Jesus fucking christ
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:26 PM
-2

Raising awareness about the pay gap. I know you will say its a myth now. To that I say you're delusional. Good conversation.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 01:50 PM
-2

ITT: People who missed the point.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 11:58 PM
-8

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say 99.99 percent of mra subscribers including yourself have no idea what feminism is.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 02:18 AM
0

Im stopping you at your first sentence. No one is saying that. Absolutely no one. That does not mean the problem of sexual harassment by men of women in the streets of NYC isn't an issue. Secondly, you're right, the societal factors around make it so that those men think that it's okay to do that. Hiw the fuck is that nkt a gender issue then? Jesus fucking christ
/r/MensRights06/11/14 01:13 PM
0

Syraight men sexually harassing a woman has nothing to do with them being men?????
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:13 PM
-9

That doesn't change the fact that sexual harassment by men against women is an issue in new york.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:13 AM
6

Porn stars don't actually fuck well in porn. It's aesthetics and acting. Edit: actually the fact that you don't know that makes me realize you don't exactly know what you're talking about.
/r/seduction28/10/14 12:25 PM
-2

Ironic because this title is further proof of the need for feminism. whoosh
/r/MensRights25/10/14 01:03 AM
1

Im not doing anything you're saying
/r/MensRights17/10/14 01:02 PM
0

3edgy5me
/r/MensRights16/10/14 11:07 PM
0

Since when has it not meant male dominance?
/r/MensRights16/10/14 10:29 PM
-1

I don't know what you're talking about. Patriarchy simply means male dominance. Males dominating other males is a huge part of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:20 PM
-1

What upvotes? What are you talking about? I provided the only intelligent responses here.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 10:57 PM
-4

I had to edit my comment multiple time because I am on mobile. Each edit I addressed each part of your comment. It's late, but I will say that being taken seriously is a privilege that women are not by nature of patriarchy afforded. This is clearly demonstratable in the business world and one of the oldest arguments in the book. A sublet of being taken seriously is to be taken seriously as someone who has their own agency and desires and ambitions to succeed, whatever their objective may be. Tha…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:54 AM
-2

As for your first part, you created a strawman by changung the variables to absolutes. Secondly, the idea that women can't be taken seriously as capable of danger is rooted in patriarchy. Feminists don't like the idea that women are delicate flowers. Secondly, feminism's roots are to undermine patriarchy. That inherently deals with women's issues due to the very nature of patriarchy. They aren't ignoring men, they are undermining patriarchy in the most effective way: empowering women. With patri…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:28 AM
-7

Do you really think women even make up 20% of acid attackers? Get real. Is it a hypothesis that almost all acid attackers are men? Yes. Is it out of thin air? No. Don't discredit my position for not having access to statistics not readily available. You and I both know the acid attackers are almost always men. That being said, men on men crimes are by their nature not the forefront of feminist concerns and why would they be? I have no idea why that is even a criticism here on feminists. Honestly…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:04 AM
1

I would argue that the attacks against men are based in assertion of power and masculinity. Thus making them a gender issue with males asserting themselves over other males in order to put them in their place over perceived "lost honor." And let's face it, "honor" is a big part of what makes up masculinity in patriarchal societies.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 03:52 AM
-7

Let me ask you guys this: what percentage of acid attackers of men are other men? I'm guessing close to 100%. First off, feminists would say that those men are victims in patriarchy and point to it as evidence about why men should be feminists. Secondly, say you disagree with my first point. Why would feminists as you see them care about men acid attacking other men? Edit: this is geared towards commenters who immediately responded "hurr durr feminists are evil" when honestly this has nothing to…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:37 AM
-1

The guy obviously wanted to have sex with them. This isn't rape in any sense. The fact that all of you are trying to push it as rape proves it's some sort of revenge fantasy or whatever to punish women. If the guy wanted it, brags about it, it isn't rape.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 12:25 PM
0

Why would the NFLPA fight on behalf of college students?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 11:19 AM
1

I said you were wrong in reponse to that specific thing you said. Of course they got a kick out of being assholes. Every bully does. But this isn't 4chan. This isn't anonymous. This is grownass adults threatening me without a care who sees. Nothing they did was defensible. I don't know why you are trying to argue with me.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 11:21 PM
1

You are wrong in thinking that it doesn't matter if he threatened me or not.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:39 PM
1

I said that cyber bullying and racism shouldn't be tolerated on a group facebook page. When people threaten you, theu do it to exert control and dominance. So you're wrong.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 03:39 PM
1

As for the second, simply because it could be worse, does not make it acceptable. You cannot really make excuses for their behavior.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:58 AM
1

As for the first, I admitted I shouldn't have said it, but they had been harassing me all day. Did I sink to their level? Yes. But they had not responded to any rational point. They only responded to harassment and one liners. Should I have simply ignored them, sure. It was a moment of weakness because I was sick of being bullied and let pride take over. How can someone who simply went to community college 20 years ago call into question the intelligence of someone going to law school? How can a…
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:58 AM
2

How would you like me to verify
/r/MensRights22/08/14 03:40 PM
1

Thanks for believing in me and responding. I've had that discussion here before and I made this post about an issue, not to debate philosophy.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:48 PM
2

Are you serious?
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:43 PM
1

I already did. Edit: by the way, where are you getting this? another user posted this exact same comment word for word using that exact same format
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:20 AM
1

I didn't even think about that. I already went to the police and filed a report. Do you think they would have said anything if he also had a police record?
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:08 AM
2

I think men's issues would be solved through feminism, yes. That being said this subreddit is very knowledgeable about the legal system and how to approach law enforcement. I disagree with how most MRAs want to solve their issues, but that doesn't mean individuals from this subreddit have nothing to offer. That is my stance. If you don't like it we will have to agree to disagree.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:06 AM
1

I wish I saw this before, I ended up going to the police. I had enough sense to reread the entire conversation before hand. I made no threatening remarks. Long story short, this night a woman user insulted me and then this man joined in before I responded or saw. Being tired of this I replied saying something about her going to community college and that I was surprised the man remembered me considering he was probably drunk by noon. This is when the guy went off on me. He said I disrespected hi…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:24 AM
4

Thank you.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:14 AM
1

OP, Racism.
/r/seduction21/08/14 07:21 AM
3

Huh?
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:38 PM
1

It's ironic that someone would accuse people of being chauvinistic while unknowingly to himself being chauvinistic in the accusation of chauvinism. It is also ironic that the leader of one of the most inherent patriarchal institutions would call a group that by its very nature is anything but chauvinistic, chauvinists.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:38 PM
-2

I was mocking the pope's language. You are a brick wall. This whole subreddit is.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 07:22 AM
-5

So men who are feminists are chauvinists in skirts? As a male feminist I'm also offended by the implications of that statement because it suggests male feminists are less of a "man."
/r/MensRights24/06/14 03:13 AM
-6

You're a smart one. I wonder how many upvotes MRAs will give you for that. I can imagine it now. "Good job bro! You sure shut that bitch up!"
/r/MensRights24/06/14 03:03 AM
-6

To belittle feminism as chauvinists in skirts is only illustrating that he has no idea what feminism is. This is the same Pope that thinks gay marriage oppresses children, but no, he must be right because it fits your narrative.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:52 AM
-8

Why not just say "women?" If you know anything about feminism, you would know that most feminist women aren't prancing around in skirts.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:12 AM
4

Since when have feminists not been against MAN-made religions?
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:00 AM
1

Greater French philosophers than Alain Soral are responsible for the beginning of second wave feminism, fyi. Pick and choose I guess.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 01:49 AM
4

When referring to alliteration, it is important to note that it wasn't in English originally. But hey, I ruined the circle-jerk so downvote away.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 01:38 AM
-11

calling a woman a skirt is chauvinistic.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 01:28 AM
-9

Him belittling women by dismissing them as "skirts" is being chauvinistic. It's ironic because he calls feminists chauvinistic.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 11:29 PM
-13

Dismisses women as "skirts." It's rather belittling. He could have just said women. It's called a microtransgression.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 11:15 PM
-12

Saying they are chauvinists in skirts is a rhetorical tactic to dismiss and velittle them than actually providing a philosophical argument on why he doesn't like feminism.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 11:05 PM
5

Except he didn't say it in English
/r/MensRights23/06/14 10:55 PM
-21

The irony is this quote depicts why feminism is necessary. edit: along with the downvotes
/r/MensRights23/06/14 10:40 PM
1

A leader of a patriarchal institution doesn't like feminism? Who would have thought?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 10:30 PM
-15

They're happy with my cock
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:46 AM
1

It's a case by case basis obviously.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:02 PM
1

It's about gaining a feminist consciousness. Feminist women want to transcend patriarchy, not manipulate it to their advantage. So if women aren't operating in their patriarchal roes, child custody for instance, will not be biased against men. That's just one example of how bringing women up has positive effects for males issues.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 07:51 PM
2

Give me time. How much do you already know?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 07:23 PM
0

The r/feminism subreddit is a place where feminists get banned too. You aren't special.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:41 PM
0

A conspiracy theory? This is a new one.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:43 PM
0

I'm not saying that. If patriarchy was gone men who have injustices done to them due to women playing in their patriarchal roles wouldn't happen. You solve the issue by bringing women up. MRAs misattribute their blame. Sorry it takes me long to respond. People on this subreddit use the downvote button as a disagree button and it inhibits my ability to provide timely responses. It's ironic because I'm actually providing discussion instead of circle jerking.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:51 PM
0

OP, this post I am replying to is evidence of exactly what I was saying. If you are serious about learning about a movement that is beneficial to both genders then PM me and I will send you any number of great articles to answer your curiosity. I won't waste my time arguing over the internet with someone who won't change their mind and thinks they know it all when ironically they know literally nothing about the topic at hand. You would be surprised at how almost no one on this subreddit has rea…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:40 PM
-4

I will be downvoted because this subreddit hates feminism and constantly demonizes and misrepresents it, but feminism does deal with men's issues. Almost all the inequalities this subreddit complains about are due to patriarchy and feminism is the intellectual movement meant to counter patriarchy. Due to the inherent nature of patriarchy, male dominance, women's issues take a front seat. People who dont understand patriarchy will argue that this is unfair, such as most people in this subreddit. …
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:10 PM
2

Hey, thanks for the invite.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 04:32 PM
-9

Karma whoring this subreddit is so easy. "Feminism...... bad." cue thunderous applause
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:42 PM
2

This subreddit is honestly terrible. The way I approach men's issues is that they are a result of patriarchal attitudes, so in order to resolve them more feminism is needed, not less. If MRAs want to be taken seriously they should embrace feminism, not fight a war of misinformation against it.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:18 PM
0

Wow, haven't heard that since 1996
/r/MensRights15/05/14 02:22 PM
-1

Feminist subs like feminism? No shit. Who would have thought? You deserve a god damn medal.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 06:29 AM
0

This was a breath of fresh air. You GET IT. Thank you. Sorry for the downvotes you got. I will gladly go down the ship with you.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 06:14 AM
1

You probably haven't read any philosophers.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:32 PM
1

It came up in topic that r/mr was misrepresenting feminism in a non-intellectually, dishonest way ,and I pointed it out. I didn't start any sort of trouble
/r/MensRights14/05/14 12:56 AM
1

Clarify: I NEVER said that. I said men's rights has no idea what feminism is. Not what men's rights is. Although I do think the perception MRAs hold on this subreddit is approaching the issue in the wrong way.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 12:26 AM
0

I'm not paying 8 dollars to read one article. Also, the abstract had nothing to do with what he was saying and he didn't even give a page number to cite his source. I'd be looking for a needle in a haystack to find one obscure sentence that he probably misinterpreted or took out of context. And even if this one author supports his assertion, it doesn't make it true. If you want to use academic sources, scholarship heavily favors feminism... because you know, people in academia generally know wha…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 12:05 AM
1

I really wasn't, but okay.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 11:55 PM
1

The difference is that I'm not belittling MR issues. I was defending a misconception and suggesting that more feminism would be beneficial to MRAs because MR issues are rooted in problems with patriarchy and feminisms goal is to transcend patriarchy. Therefore feminism is beneficial to both men and women in different ways.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:40 PM
4

I think feminists should be allowed safe spaces on their own subreddits and if users who are clearly not feminists are trolling, they should be banned. You don't see users from r/atheism trolling r/Christianity or r/islam, but you constantly see trolls on the feminist subreddits downvoting and purposely trying to cause trouble. If you aren't a feminist, why go to a feminist subreddit? Let them have their own space. My 2 cents.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 07:36 AM
-1

Feminism is about transcending patriarchy, it is logically inconsistent to say they use it to their advantage.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:40 AM
0

I have no idea what I just read.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:07 AM
-5

Obviously not. Cue to inevitable post where "feminazis" attack someone. Again, strawman. You only care about something that caters to your worldview wen feminism as an academic subject has very significant things to say about women and patriarchy. But yeah, not like you would take the time to educate yourself.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 07:07 PM
-5

No one dies. It's a metaphorical fight against the dominating reality in society. It's working within the realms of patriarchy to even suggest that people need to die.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:41 PM
-3

Simone de beauvoir started second wave feminism. She is the mother of feminism in the twentieth century. Without her, there is no feminism. Pretty sure what she says is important. Also, an actual philospher has more to say on a philosophy than an undergrad. Doesn't matter the subject.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:32 PM
-6

Feminism isn't doing anything you said it is.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:21 PM
-14

The whole point of feminism is to cause problems for the patriarchal reality in which we live. So you are spot on.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:14 PM
-14

Also men in patriarchal society are more likely to be rapists and if they are raped they are more likely to be victim of other men.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:12 PM
-11

Feminism is a philosophical school of thought. That's how it originated. You yourself don't take the time to read feminist philosophers but tear it down like you know what it is. The Second Sex by Simone de Beauvoir is a great place to start if you actually want to learn something about feminism.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:10 PM
-10

I do read it. Most of the issues here encompasd an injustice done to an innocent man by a woman manipulating her position in the patriarchy to get what she wants. Feminists don't buy into patriarchy. Feminist women don't use patriarchy to their advantage. They seek to transcend patriarchy.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:08 PM
-11

And where is that "rule 1" you speak of? I'm well read on feminist philosophy and I never came across it.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:51 PM
-16

Pain is caused to victims by people who buy into patriarchy. The inherent nature of patriarchy is that it will be male dominated because it appeals to men more.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:50 PM
-12

I think youre creating a boogeyman to circlejerk around. Why don't you spend time actually learning about one of the most important philosophical development in the 20th century?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:47 PM
-11

And the woman's aid link doesn't prove your point. They were upset because the statistics were misleading and wanted more published to prove their point. Not less.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:46 PM
-11

I read the abstract of the third link abd that has nothing to do with what you're saying. This post serves as an artifact of the strawman fallacy I am pointing out.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:42 PM
-13

You literally could not be more wrong. Try reading feminist philosophers instead of creating a strawman out of feminism in order to tear it down easily. I'm willing to bet you've never read a scholarly piece of feminst work in your life.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:20 PM
-25

At it's core feminism works to undermine patriarchy and most posts here I see are stories of men who are shitty situations because they live in a patriarchal society.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 04:35 PM
-31

Im prepared for the downvotes, this subreddit has no idea what feminism is. Edit: im not saying user crackpotpatriot's comment wasn't feminist. Just responding to someone who seems like they get it.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 04:25 PM
2

Young conservatives support legalization
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:47 PM
3

It's difficult though, because you still want to be ALIVE, you know? edit: have you ever seen the movie or read the book Into The Wild? The main character goes through a huge depression because he realizes he is a bastard child.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:00 PM
15

among college-educated couples, the percentages of divorces initiated by women is approximately 90% wow. as a college educated guy, this scares me.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 11:43 PM
6

I actually agree with the "feminist" in this post. If atheists bombarded r/christianity they wouldn't like it either. r/christianity is a place for christians to go and discuss their faith without being bombarded. Feminist debates would belong in the subreddit r/askfeminists
/r/MensRights24/07/12 04:40 PM
3

Mila Kunis is my girlfriend.... she just doesn't know it yet.
/r/seduction10/07/12 05:24 AM
-4

social conservative so intolerant of people who aren't culturally christian?
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:36 AM
-1

I found that if a man treats a woman as an equal, she perceives it as not masculine and is therefore not attracted to you. It is a pretty good in general rule when dealing with immature women. edit: i got downvoted but even feminist Simone De Beauvoir said it. You know, in her ground breaking book The Second Sex.
/r/seduction10/01/12 08:53 AM
1

I am confused, are you saying he tells us to chase any woman or dont do that?
/r/seduction10/01/12 06:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter