TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Chicken-samosa Archive

View 1 post and 40 comments by Chicken-samosa on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Question For WomenChicken-samosa/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 07:49 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

I don't exactly claim "women are boring". But women are more boring compared to men. My interests are already niche even among men. Women tend to be more "normal" and men tend to be relatively more neurotic. Most women in my life are very passionless in whatever interests they have. Can't exactly call that fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 10:13 PM
–

She's a twox and aitah user. You won't get a good faith response from her (you might not even get a response).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 05:12 AM
1

Imma be honest chief. Never seen this shit happen in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:18 PM
1

What do bluepillers even stand for? Most tell me that they are just there to be the opposites of redpillers. At least have some conviction and form opinions instead of hiding behind "No true scotsmen". Gets even more confusing when you debate them and sometimes when they agree, it tends to be in line with red pill. So you are just a hypocrite?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:00 AM
1

Lady, in general, in real life (please don't lecture me your anecdotes), there are very few interests which overlap for both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 06:56 PM
2

I simply fail to see what it is about decorations and furniture that women are vehemently outspoken against men who live with their simple bean bag, air mattress and computer on the floor. I would imagine for most men, we are raised with a scarcity mindset. If existing on the bare minimum makes me content, I definitely would.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 05:28 AM
0

I have red pill ideas. So I would only be convinced if there was some sort of secret subconscious mind reading tech on a large number of women which collected data on the truth of whether women truly on average care about personality more than attraction and concluded that a good personality was preferred. (I am talking about attraction to an average man with good personality vs attractive man with bad personality)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 12:56 PM
1

If you consider all the replies here and what traits they describe, you end up with what is traditionally considered masculine. Gendering some toxic behavior seems nefarious in its intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 12:12 PM
4

Do you consider it "fucked up content" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 11:57 AM
7

Do you also happen to denounce violence in movies and video games?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 10:30 AM
5

You didn't address animation. Secondly, smut absolutely does only (in most cases) focuses on how some man being so in love with some woman, does some wild and irrational act. The entire focus is on how the woman is the centre of everything for the man. To me that just seems as selfish as porn. Also, what do you define as "fucking" ? To me it seems that both parties are involved. Finally, something being gratuitous, is it really the basis for calling someone selfish for wanting that?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 10:28 AM
16

If that's the case then in general claiming all those things about women "knowing" someone being bad is just plain wrong. You have to present this argument to those women, not all of us. Because the argument makes it seem that either women are stupid or malicious or not self aware
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 07:11 AM
7

I've always wondered what you guys think of animated porn. And regarding the "selfish sexuality" thing; do you also share the same view for women who read smut?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 07:02 AM
2

Do you root for equality or equity OP? I do the former. You seem to dismiss "some nutjobs" who shut down men's spaces. Yet suddenly, "we" need to hold "each other" accountable?? Feminism doesn't need to fight for men. But atleast they should come to a conclusion amongst themselves on what feminism should be first. If its about equality or only about women (primarily).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 05:32 PM
1

Seems reasonable. I actually come from a place where re marrying is taboo. Some of my family members had to go through their husbands dying. They would survive because its also a place of tight knit family. But in the modern world, I think both spouses should have some safety net.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 04:18 PM
0

For me, I need to find someone cold and calculated with similar interests. Almost psychopathic (must view humans as animals). Must have interests in math, physics and computers. I want this person to yap our favorite topics. (yes babe, please tell me more about your interpretation of how complex eigenvalues in R2 can mean existence of z axis) And I cannot reiterate this enough but this person needs to view humans as animals. I don't think I can even discuss why, here. Btw oi u/McDonaldsCrewBoi I…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 03:14 PM
3

I have never seen any major media outlet ever showcasing any feminist woman protesting against things that women in this thread speak of. They don't have any reason to, but it seems dishonest to say you do care.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 02:17 PM
1

Crazy how I never see women go after these women independently. I see them going after men, but when it comes to women it's "fantasy". They could have left people alone but still decided to bring your "video games are violent" attitude; that too inconsistently.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 07:39 PM
1

So many replies with option A. I guess that should really sell it that for the vast majority of women, personality doesn't mean shit. I only hope that redditors aren't representative of our inner personalities hidden when we go outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:53 AM
16

The idea of this post is repeated every two-three weeks in other posts. There's always the same and correct response: there will always be a simp. No matter how much others try. You as an organism trying to fight evolution of 200000 years with knowledge of a few hundred years ain't gonna work for the most part. Can't change humans just like that. We are all animals after all. Despite of whatever civility we assume. Better to genetically modify us, but I guess you can't be called a human then, ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 08:46 AM
16

Even better. They will ignore the message and run as far as they can. Either that or they will nitpick and move goalposts.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 12:07 PM
1

People used to die early though. Not so frail in your 40s and 50s compared to 70s or 80s
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 10:18 AM
2

Except those people in the past would be working. Deaths used to be early you know. I too wish there weren't that many people. But taxes are gonna go up. Unless of course you don't believe in pensions. Where I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 09:37 AM
–

Its true though. And is relevant to the discussion. You can't expect to discuss things when you run away from the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 10:42 PM
0

the bad? reactions to the negative reactions. The creator and the documentry itself weren't really that polarizing. You can say it was clickbait. But the point remains. Feminists do try to drown red pill when they try to play victim
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 12:44 PM
1

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/13/the-red-pill-screening-divides-campus-libertarians-from-pro-women-groups
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 12:27 PM
1

No they don't They do though. Want an example?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 12:02 PM
2

is this satisfactory? https://math.mit.edu/wim/2019/03/10/national-mathematics-survey/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 05:46 AM
2

How though? His is a statistically true experience. Hers is the exception here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 04:58 AM
4

"his reasoning is anecdotal too." Its really not though. I don't know where you live where there are a lot of math ladies. But statistically there's always a decreasing trend in percentages of women for higher and higher education in subjects like math, physics, tech be it for cultural or historical or whatever reason. The end result is these subjects are seen as masculine. Especially for graduate level math, I have always seen the percentage as below 30%. And remember that we haven't even filte…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 04:30 PM
9

I don't understand this line of reasoning. What is the "really?" suppose to accomplish here? Are you implying you don't believe that there are less woman interested in math based on the anecdotal evidence that...... your local uni has "lots of women there"? Is this somehow supposed to negate his experience?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 02:14 PM
1

Maybe not directly. But I don't know how someone will know another's personality by just looking at pictures.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 02:31 PM
1

https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/articles/10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0192-x Just one, But I am sure people will provide you more if you ask in a separate post (I am not sure about the legality of sending stats and studies as it's mentioned in the rules, not to do so. ). Also, how would you know someone's personality through a dating profile? Not knowing the personality seems to be the obvious situation. So I don't know why you would think that women would go through 100s of messages from ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 09:45 AM
1

Nice. Finally someone who agrees. 🤝
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 05:46 AM
1

Never said it did. But since you accept the bias in one, can't we accept the bias in the other?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 05:42 AM
-1

Why would it be a requirement to get a holistic impression of people biologically?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 05:37 AM
2

Can't we accept online dating statistics then? Instead of saying it is biased?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 05:33 AM
0

I think we can consider it online? I tried to Google for statistics and have conflicting survey results. Some say its 10% and some are saying 70%. I will settle with 40% as well. I am not sure how you will push against a trend that biologically makes sense. I personally don't think its wrong for individual women to choose the cream of the crop, if given the chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 05:30 AM
1

But from there, we have conservatives, liberals, trad cons, progressives, feminists, egalitarians, pro sex work, anti sex work, pro slut, not big on sluttery, etc. Can't we use the same argument to accept online dating statistics? and the only thing. I don't think that they say its the only thing that matters And also snorting milk through my nose when people say online dating is a 1:1 for real life Agreed with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 05:19 AM
0

Hence why I think, statistics based on online dating should be given priority. We are "online people" after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 04:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter