TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ChiefChoofin Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by ChiefChoofin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Too many women are being arrested for miscarriages, dying in parking lots, or being forced to give birth to babies who drs know will not live or this "Brain-dead woman must carry fetus to birth because of Georgia’s abortion ban, hospital tells family"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:04 PM
2

the 'teaborn' app was not banned, as u/Realistic-Ad-1023 said "I think you’ve fallen for disinformation friend. I can’t find that anywhere."
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 09:27 PM
1

just providing clarification, given my understanding that u/Downtown_Cat_1745 was jesting about your having placed the onus on women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 08:55 PM
27

I believe that the ROOT of why men have voted against their own self interests, especially lately, is because women won't sleep with them. If women did sleep with them (not by paying for it), then they would overall have much less issue with any rhetoric that is critical of men's behavior on a systemic/societal level. work on your wording
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 05:58 AM
-1

they didn't deny that?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 09:21 PM
2

a rant masquerading as a debate post begets its own judgement; this forum thrives on the contrary: hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:02 AM
-1

men replacing men, wonder why it wasn't women; suppose nuance to be a fool's errand?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 07:52 PM
1

neither of those seem to definitionally be 'matriarchal societies', let alone support the notion that a matriarchy is 'better at war'; your own note on their 'very male dominated elements' seems to contrast your original claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 09:22 AM
15

Germany, Australia, UK, Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland, Greece, Belgium, Australia, NZ, Canada, Costa Rica, Columbia, Venezuela, Mexico, India, Singapore, Thailand, Cambodia, Philippines, Turkey…. didn't know all those countries were a part of 'America'
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 01:30 AM
3

They actually would, historically matriarchal societies were actually better at war because of less conflict within the ranks of the society. That's quite the bold claim, could you provide some sources or names of said 'matriarchal societies'?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:23 AM
-1

OP literally said “it seems most women don’t work out” in the body of their post that was titled “why do women not work out as much as men” So like, no? Lol not my problem OPs phrasing changed across title and body of post. My bad for using context clues to glean their meaning. What’s better? Only reading the title of an article and not the body of it? Ignoring OPs additional statement? what are you waffling on about? You posted those links saying data agrees with OP so like which of OPs stateme…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 07:54 AM
1

What exactly did I doctor? The only thing I even quoted was a raw statistic which is in the CDC link. you doctored this quote: “most women don’t work out compared to men” neither I nor the original poster said that^ then the correct statement is most men and women don’t workout enough lol you're correcting a statement that you made up^ I don’t think these studies combined make the statement “most women don’t workout but most men do” factual. I'll let you figure out why the studies I linked don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:36 AM
1

well said.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 08:42 PM
1

instead of doctoring quotes to win a fictitious argument, I suggest you reread the post and my comments, carefully. The 2nd 2 didn’t link to any data. the links are embedded into the text using standard markdown syntax, but here are the raw links assuming your device doesn't support embedded links or you are unable. cdc - https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db443.htm nhs.uk - https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/health-survey-for-england/2021-part-2/physi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 08:34 PM
10

your source doesn't support your claim, reread it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 07:19 AM
3

well, I'm here, aren't I?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 07:12 AM
8

cdc, nhs.uk, europa.eu
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:42 AM
4

would aerobic activities not count as 'working out'? or are you referring to something else?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:10 AM
1

statistics side with the original poster
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:03 AM
3

"I’m married to a wonderful partner, we had an open relationship up until recently." Original poster - Baileyjo69 I rest my case. How?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 10:34 PM
2

So you can't actually define the central term of your own argument nor answer clear cut questions. Instead, you're falling back on tired stereotypes that stem from a fundamental lack of understanding of these fields. There's no basis for a real discussion here. Take care.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 08:59 PM
2

Quoting what 'people perceive' isn't an answer to what you believe; describing engineering as '[more-so] linear' also doesn't answer if it's 'cerebral'. You've avoided both questions, congrats.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 08:29 PM
2

You didn't answer the question; you're also implying that coding and mechanical engineering aren't cerebral. Is that what you believe?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:43 PM
5

This post isn’t a “males don’t have pros” post. It’s a “the average male’s pros aren’t necessarily intellectual or cerebral” post. you're implying that the average females "pros" would be "intellectual or cerebral", would you support such a statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:03 PM
1

care to elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:34 AM
7

the reason people pit these two issues together instead of condemning it as a whole is because misandry has been framed as "punching up", quite unfortunate
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 08:06 PM
0

did you reply to the wrong person? because your comment doesn't answer my question nor relate to the point I made in my comment about how no one is allowed to make threats of violence without facing push back
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 07:01 PM
1

Women aren't in a place socially where they can just state their case and threaten violence if they don't get their way. Women have no choice but to practice diplomacy and tact at all times, we can't use the threat of violence or social dominance without risking our jobs, our relationships, or our safety. so you're saying it is socially permissible for men to threaten others with violence to get what they want, could you provide some examples? I ask because men can't use threats of violence with…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 06:05 PM
1

it's okay, I understand that it is hard for you to admit that you are wrong and that is why you have turned to deflecting. you call me pedantic and say you "didn't say those words" despite the fact our entire discussion has been focused on proving if "Men far outdo women when it comes to lying and manipulation." or not since you yourself said "Studies show this is true". all I'll say is next time please read the articles that you link to someone and actually take a few minutes to look at the pri…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 09:17 PM
1

how am I not refuting "it"? you said there were studies that supported the notion that "Men far outdo women when it comes to lying and manipulation." and yet the studies you link show the difference in percentages being less than ten percent, you could say that men lie more than women but to to say they "far outdo" is completely false. And why you keep misspelling “Psychology”? I copy and pasted the markdown text that had the link to "psychology today" embedded and didn't notice the misspelling …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 06:05 AM
1

"A recent paper by Kennedy and Kray, published in Current Opinion in Psychology, suggests men are more selfishly dishonest than women." Psychologoy today if you actually took the time to even open the source you would see this as the first line "We review the evidence linking gender to dishonesty and conclude that men are often more dishonest than women, especially in competitive settings where lies advance self-interest. However, gender differences in dishonesty are often small and mutable acro…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 04:39 AM
–

Where is that energy now? taking two contradicting ideas from two different (groups of) people and pinning it as some 'gotcha' moment is a clear example of arrogance and idiocy
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 04:25 AM
–

"I can easily get a date actually" "I struggle finding a women that has qualities worth long term investment, accountability being the main one." he can get dates just not high quality dates hence the "struggle with dating"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 12:00 AM
1

could you provide a link to said studies? I wasn't able to find much of anything that supported the notion that "Men far outdo women when it comes to lying and manipulation."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 08:02 PM
3

if I recall lord of the flies correctly, it was a representation of the saying "three days to animal"; I envisioned something more along the lines of omnipotence--power without any and all consequences (since the original post stated that as the hypothetical)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 01:52 AM
-2

well I don't see how that is relevant seeing as my original comment never said everyone would?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 01:40 AM
-1

What’s the difference between the egregious actors and not? the criteria for classification, though I am not entirely sure what your question is trying to get it
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 01:26 AM
13

most people given power without consequence would end up abusing it to benefit themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 12:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter