TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ChiefSteward Archive

View 11 posts and 44 comments by ChiefSteward on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7376

False AccusationChiefSteward/r/MensRights25/12/20 07:06 PM
2493

ProgressChiefSteward/r/MensRights21/02/21 08:38 PM
406

FeminismChiefSteward/r/MensRights17/01/21 06:34 AM
118

DiscriminationChiefSteward/r/MensRights13/06/20 04:27 AM
31

DiscriminationChiefSteward/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:10 PM
1

ProgressChiefSteward/r/MensRights20/03/21 02:26 AM
1

FeminismChiefSteward/r/MensRights17/01/21 09:18 PM
1

FeminismChiefSteward/r/MensRights17/01/21 06:32 AM
1

DiscriminationChiefSteward/r/MensRights14/07/22 09:44 PM
1

FeminismChiefSteward/r/MensRights15/12/20 08:51 PM
1

DiscriminationChiefSteward/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:07 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Because OP made their personal position clear when they used the word “if” to begin their declaration. It’s not an if-scenario. De facto, women do not owe men sex and men do not owe women protection. But framing it as an if/then dynamic reveals that OP genuinely believes women do owe men sex and IF they’re not going to give him his due, THEN he’s not going to uphold his end of this imaginary social contract either. The twee little emoji at the end reinforces this. Passive-aggressive af. No one i…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 09:02 PM
-2

Ironically, the men who parrot this rhetoric are themselves wholly incapable of protecting anyone from anything except maybe their necks and dinners from getting cold. I guess they’re just chiming in out of misguided male solidarity or some shit.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:02 PM
1

Oh sure, variety is the spice of life and all that. I only meant that the idea put out there by some women that those women have it so much harder than men because they have the more difficult job of being homemakers is laughably false. Working hard for your own family’s benefit could never feel as awful and soulcrushing as working hard for a corporation’s benefit.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 07:28 PM
4

I got to do this for about two months straight. My wife caught COVID and was bedridden for almost 8 weeks. Every single day I cleaned each room of the house and prepared three home-cooked meals for all six of us. In the evenings, I’d go on walks around town with our two-year-old son. Learned to play ukulele with my daughter. Played dungeons and dragons with my kids. COVID quarantine was the best summer of my life. Having now done it myself, I’m absolutely convinced that women who complain about …
/r/MensRights08/09/24 12:46 PM
1

What you wrote was that girls who haven’t even finished puberty are somehow in their biological prime. You’re a creep and and idiot.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 10:18 PM
-1

Keep digging.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 02:43 PM
-9

You just did.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 02:21 PM
2

Right with you. There are very real, very serious problems men face in society. People like this usurping that important conversation to expose themselves as frustrated chimos makes the world see the rest of us advocates as just more of the same.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 02:13 PM
-13

Referring to 14 year old girls as “in their biological prime” is the red flag here for me. This dude is a fucking creep, which is why literal children and their mothers aren’t nice to him.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 01:26 PM
4

Long hair requires a few extra precautions to keep it from basically falling apart. Short hair gets cut so frequently that the damage from daily washing doesn’t really affect it because the part of the hair that’s been around long enough that it’s beginning to show damage is cut off. But with long hair, that damaged hair sticks around for years and makes the whole hairstyle look unkempt. So you’ve got to be more careful with it.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 02:50 PM
1

Wear a shower cap. If your hotel is fancy enough for a rain shower head, it definitely is fancy enough to have shower caps either already in room or available from housekeeping. Or, if you don’t like a shower cap, stay in a fucking Hampton Inn instead of whatever high-end bullshit has these. I travel for work. I live in hotels 40 weeks a year. Wanna talk about “sexist” hotel showers? How about the fact that anyone over 5’4” has to duck and bend just to get anything above their shoulders wet?
/r/MensRights10/05/23 02:43 PM
1

To me, it's no different than telling someone they "throw like a girl" or whatever. The implication is that girls are inherently inferior. "Small dick energy" implies that people with small penises are inherently inferior to people with large penises.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:29 AM
4

Three girls murdered a boy with a knife and the cops respond by apprehending another male with knife wounds. What the whole fuck?
/r/MensRights11/07/22 06:06 AM
-1

preach
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:09 AM
8

It's just another symptom of the casual societal disregard for male life that you think feminism was needed first. Both men and women have been horrifically mistreated by society ever since there's been society. But since that same society regards women as weaker than men and in need of protection, feminism surfaced first. That's all it was. It wasn't necessity prioritizing one over the other. It was simply that not giving a shit about men is exponentially more ingrained in the human zeitgeist t…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 05:45 PM
13

"Domestic discord" the police called it. -_-
/r/MensRights28/05/21 04:13 PM
4

Yeah, someone else already jumped in and explained it to me. Brain fart; my bad. How's your day been aside from idiots online missing your point entirely?
/r/MensRights18/05/21 10:06 PM
2

Yeah, I read it that way too. They're asking for the possible causes of the disparity, not for OP's reason for believing the disparity exists.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 10:01 PM
10

Oh, good god, thank you. I felt like I must have been missing something because otherwise it was a stupid ass question. Turns out I'm the stupid ass. I was reading that entirely wrong. I read it as though they were asking what gave OP the impression that homelessness rates were higher for men. Why are homelessness rates higher for men, was how I should have understood it.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 09:56 PM
11

Because they objectively are. OP even linked a source.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 09:22 PM
3

So this article talks about how much support and assistance women in the UK need during the employment crisis caused by COVID. Meanwhile, males' job redundancies outnumber females' job redundancies by almost 40,000. And the increase in male job redundancy was only 3% due to COVID (compared to an increase of 76% for women due to COVID) meaning it's still easier for a woman in the UK to find work even during a global pandemic than it is for a man to find work ever. But it's the women who are in cr…
/r/MensRights04/05/21 11:05 PM
1

It's the headline itself, followed by my own commentary after the hyphen.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 01:18 AM
2

Well, wait. How can there be too much of anything benign that some people enjoy? Unless the more there is of that one thing, the less there is of another benign thing that another group of some people enjoy?
/r/MensRights22/02/21 04:57 AM
13

Because there is ample evidence to suggest that she was at least a co-aggressor, if not the primary aggressor, in the abuse claims between her and Depp. Yet, while Depp has been villified and ostracized, she has seen nothing but support and praise for coming forward and "surviving" a dangerous relationship.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 01:03 AM
4

Telling a woman she can't be right about women's experiences is a non-starter.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 04:40 PM
1

I don't smile when I don't want to smile. I never said it was deeply traumatic either. I called it tedious. There's a significant distinction. People are allowed to complain about things that annoy them. Kinda like you being a complete whine ass bitch about this, ironically. Thanks for the smile.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 04:08 AM
2

You want me to smile, do something amusing. No one should have to fake their emotions to suit anyone else's preferences, and there is nothing in the world that makes a person want to smile less than being told they should already be smiling. It just gets tedious hearing the same shit constantly, and then to be always insisting that there's nothing wrong. If you're not my host/hostess, then my enjoyment or potential lack thereof is none of your business. You might as well walk up to someone and s…
/r/MensRights22/01/21 03:49 AM
1

At least you're staying consistent with your own cherry-picking.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 02:05 AM
1

I cherry-picked a clear cut, straightforward response to the question at hand and the following three paragraphs of elaboration of the actual language of the law being discussed, but you didn't cherry pick the one and only time whistling was included in a list of misogynistic activities lumped together as "hate crimes", and which preceded the elaboration and clarification I'm referencing. Gotcha. At this point I'm just shouting into the wind here.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 06:27 PM
0

That's just saying how many survey respondents got whistled at. THRICE it says whistling is not a hate crime. There's literally three whole paragraphs explicitly explaining that.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 01:56 PM
0

"Does the policy criminalise wolf whistling? No." Your reading comprehension sucks.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 05:09 AM
2

Unfortunately for me, I apparently have especially sad-looking eyes. So, "hey, smile!" has just become, "what's the matter, you look upset?" I mean, even if I was, why would I hash it out with a random stranger?
/r/MensRights17/01/21 08:47 PM
1

No, I read it. It explicitly stated that no activity had been newly criminalized, only the criminal definition of already criminal behavior had been amended. And either way, that's still not putting rape and catcalls (the category of alleged misogyny I'm assuming being told to smile falls into) on the same level. Just like theft and murder aren't considered equally criminal.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 08:34 PM
4

There's a reason I specified that this was a report of my personal, subjective experience; as opposed to claiming this was broad and objective. Learn the difference and then go off yourself clown.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 08:08 PM
-1

Not quite:: "the policy does not criminalise anything that was previously legal, and anything criminal is covered by existing legislation. "For example, a sexual assault against a woman is still a sexual assault but is now recorded as a hate crime too." There's degrees of crime. Rape is still considered much more severe a crime than catcalling.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 08:06 PM
5

In my personal, subjective experience, I've seen at least as many men told to smile as women.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 06:22 PM
2

It's not put on the same level though? Nobody ever claimed it was. Just because there are people somewhere in the world starving to death doesn't mean another person doesn't get to say, "I'm pretty hungry."
/r/MensRights17/01/21 01:52 PM
12

I've been told I look like a child molester, but that's not what this conversation was about. It's not a matter of what's the worst thing a person can be told. It's about whether or not this is a feminist issue or a something that everyone has to deal with.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 01:49 PM
12

I'd never thought of it before. Maybe. Hm...
/r/MensRights17/01/21 01:47 PM
2

Female against male sexual harrassment is too often seen as harmless at best or a joke at worst.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 04:59 AM
5

I think the notion that women receive more sexual harassment than men might be a misconception anyway. It seems more likely to me that the sexual harrassment directed at men it's just considered socially acceptable and so it goes unnoticed by anyone but the recipient.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 04:35 AM
1

I think, for a lot of people, it's the double standard at work here more than the comments themselves that rankle so much.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 03:35 AM
0

Yes! In that hypothetical, she knew what could happen. It's long been my opinion that if both parents don't agree to abort the pregnancy, than the pregnancy should not be aborted. Every action has consequences. Some consequences are brief, some last a lifetime. He knew the score when he chose his course of action.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 12:15 AM
-10

I've been active in Men's Rights for almost a decade. Ever since I found out it was a whole thing and not just me realizing on my own that the world hates men. But I'm also a huge proponent for common sense and taking responsibility. Sex can cause pregnancy. If you want to have sex, you'd better be prepared to take responsibility for what might follow. EDIT: to clarify, I'm personally of the opinion that a mutually agreed upon abortion counts as taking responsibility.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 11:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter