TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ChilOfAnIdleBrain Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by ChilOfAnIdleBrain on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Conservative men are some of the most likely politicians to hurt men and coddle women. I admit I lean conservative right now, but that’s because it’s currently the only place you can find any honest debate.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 04:03 AM
6

Most women are simply incapable of empathizing with men. They are much more likely than men to vote for things that only benefit women.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 03:53 AM
6

It’s always interesting to me how zealots can always look back at history and find all the ways in which every human before them did it wrong, but be completely oblivious to the fact that the same things can, and will almost certainly, be said about them in the future.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 03:50 AM
2

I think modern medicine and the almost complete disappearance of youthful labor has had a strong effect on how we age, or don’t appear to as quickly now.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 03:43 AM
137

You know what the saddest part is? Instead of addressing the issue, in all likelihood, they’re just going to lower the age compared to amount of T
/r/MensRights15/05/22 04:49 PM
0

Yea, it’s just annoying
/r/MensRights15/05/22 03:07 PM
6

So no.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 03:04 PM
2

I’m in the US, and I’ve never heard of her, so I appreciate the share. On another note, culturally, I feel like women in the UK are just better writers, even historically, than women in the US. Maybe it’s just my perception, but they come across as less abrasive, less reactionary, more measured. There are some US women writers who are like that, just seems less prevalent. Like Emily Dickinson for instance.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 02:41 PM
9

Does this bot show up in toxic feminist subs?
/r/MensRights15/05/22 02:34 PM
96

There is no such thing as toxic masculinity. What people who use the term toxic masculinity are really saying is just “toxic behavior” and if that’s the underlying issue than it has absolutely NOTHING to do with masculinity, and could just as easily be associated with femininity, which goes unchecked, or worse, encouraged under the guise of empowerment.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 02:34 PM
-8

Untrue. Show me any activist who had positive change and I will point to the same activist and show exactly how much damage they did. In every case it will either be a wash, or they will have ultimately done more harm than good. The only thing an activist is good for is starting a conversation, but those will germinate without activists, just because the activist had the loudest voice does not mean, in any way, that they hold responsibility for the movement they claim to represent, or the change…
/r/MensRights15/05/22 02:22 PM
1

It’s not quality, it’s necessity. SOMEONE will have to do it. Older people are going to die, so if it’s not you then it will be those younger than you.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 01:47 PM
1

I mean, I guess it’s cool if you want to get a dopamine hit from being a twat, like however you need to get that fix, go get it. But heroin is way better.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 01:46 PM
3

I will definitely have her name in my head during my next book hunt. Ty
/r/MensRights15/05/22 01:43 PM
19

The activist is the most useless person society has to offer. A feminist activist is actively harmful to society.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 05:59 AM
28

This is just women being women. They are completely incapable of grasping the fact that most of them cannot even begin to empathize with men. Women are extremely deficient in this area. If women were the best writers we wouldn’t need quotas or to “raise female voices” the cream would have risen to the top long ago. At best, they’re equal to men, at worst, they’re not as talented. This isn’t universal, but it’s clearly a trend. Writing is hard, it takes grit, determination, loss, and thick skin, …
/r/MensRights15/05/22 04:48 AM
9

This is going to be thrown out. The govt cannot force someone to say certain words, banning some words in certain settings using title may have an argument, but not compelling speech.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 04:27 AM
1

You need to take care of your mental health first and foremost, or even that time with your daughter will not be as fulfilling as it could be. 30 miles is not far. I imagine that changes only the Thursday arrangement. Go home, be happy, your daughter will also enjoy that time with happy fulfilled dad much more. In my opinion
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:56 AM
0

I’m reading too much into your comments? A penis is uniquely violative? You still haven’t explained that other than in relation to pregnancy and “historical use” which I just argued against. Please, if your going to defend an argument don’t just send me back to the original statement, make a defense of that assertion. This cycle of hurting people, especially victims (by making them less of a victim) just leads to more harm. How can you fail to see this? It sounds to me you tend to lean more libe…
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:39 AM
1

Um, how are we NOT talking about female vs male victims when we are specifically talking about the use of a penis? Do women have a penis? Do men? Women cannot use a penis. So saying penile rape is worse (uniquely violative) IS saying male victims penetrated with something else had it easier, or not worse. What are you saying differently? How am I not attacking your argument? Either penile rape is not uniquely violative (the crux of your argument-or English Law’s-for a varying definition of rape)…
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:23 AM
1

Ok, this is progress. But I’m struggling to see how someone in the mrm movement could use the term “uniquely violative” in relation to the idea that male victims of rape aren’t the same as female victims, based on a narrow definition of rape, which I thought was what we were arguing. I also was not accusing you of anything, I was pointing to a correlation that’s happening in our culture related to the way in which you were arguing. Also “your characterizations” are ideas, unless you think they’r…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:32 PM
-2

Maybe if the original topic weren’t Roe, and the concept of a constitutional right to abortion
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:29 PM
3

Chomsky has lost his damn mind.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:28 PM
5

I’m not surprised at all. A lot of MODs here, especially on politics, are not people who aspire to decency. Or people who ever think they can be wrong. Which is why they create “safe spaces.” Which just means “places where people are free to be volatile , wrong, and even violent,” if they’re the right people. Musk needs to buy Reddit as well
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:27 PM
0

When you can’t attack an argument. I mean you started by saying I misunderstood you, and now you’re just dipping claiming a straw man “cuz you say so.” If it’s a straw man, tell me how it’s a straw man, attack my words with your words. Don’t run away, that’s not how thinking people come to conclusions. Again, that’s exactly how you stop progress. You run away to your comfort zone where your arguments are nice and safe. So you then feel justified in using violence and indecency to “win” a cultura…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:20 PM
0

I’m just not sure how you could classify anything I said as reading to much into what you said. Just because English law narrowly defines rape today because of its “uniquely violative nature” in the past-which is clearly an expression of the idea that penile rape is somehow unique in its veracity as opposed to any other unwelcome penetrative violation, because of the possibility it may result in pregnancy, doesn’t necessarily make it so, certainly not to the victim of penetration (to which I thi…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:12 PM
7

The FBI may be interested, and honestly, I would perm the link and hold onto it for when something like this actually does happen, whether it was this person or someone inspired by someone like her. This is the only way people learn
/r/MensRights14/05/22 10:14 PM
1

I’d love to know what you mean. Could you clarify where I’ve gone wrong?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 10:08 PM
3

You’re arguing against your own point here. You say there is something “uniquely violative” about a man raping a woman, but not about a woman raping a man, with the same breath you make a logical connection between the indifference in giving and taking as some kind of truth. Historical acts should not be ignored, but they cannot be the only measure of how we operate moving forward. That is a wonderful way to divide, instill resentment, and destroy progress. By denying men who are raped by women …
/r/MensRights14/05/22 09:37 PM
15

“Basic decency” no longer exists in the west. It’s no longer a concept people aspire to, in the same way that sanctity has disappeared. People like to pretend all change is progress, when it’s blatantly obvious it is not. A lot of women simply have no capability to empathize with men. Many women will protect their own son, but that’s out of motherly instinct rather than empathy.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 02:00 PM
1

I just don’t see a logical reason for the legal definition of the act to be changed based on the tool used to accomplish the same ends. To me, it feels like having a legal definition for the commission of murder with a hammer to the head or a gun. While I understand that there are many ways and differences to HURT people that probably should have successive meanings, like flaying someone to kill them or shooting them, this isn’t that. This is using a different tool to commit the exact same traum…
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:55 PM
2

Never said it wasn’t, and both need to be addressed if we’re going to protect little boys from female predators
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:41 PM
3

Ok, but how does that make sense? What exactly changes when using a penis? What if a transgender man has a penis created that pumped up, is that now rape? What’s the difference between that and a dildo? Then a dildo or a bottle? You see the logical pathway?
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:40 PM
-7

Laws written by men who only ever imagined being raped by a man.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 03:23 AM
10

Only the fuckin tea pots would change a law because it was used properly
/r/MensRights14/05/22 03:21 AM
5

Ok, wait, so even if a woman ties a guy up and penetrates him with foreign objects she can’t be charged with rape? I’m not sure how that can possibly be justified even under their unbelievably sexist and antiquated rape laws.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 03:16 AM
4

For SURE
/r/MensRights14/05/22 03:13 AM
3

I should have clarified. I believe this sub is more focused on societal trends that harm men and boys, rather than one off verdicts.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 03:11 AM
158

If the victim were a boy I honestly do not believe we would have a life sentence here
/r/MensRights13/05/22 06:21 PM
1

Ok though, this is Steve, as much legitimacy as Jerry Springer, so I’m not sure on the veracity of this one story, but this kind of abuse certainly happens, I’ve seen police videos of little boys found taped up in closets. So it certainly happens. Even knowing this one story was probably not true, I still couldn’t listen once she talked about the tape
/r/MensRights13/05/22 05:51 PM
1

The last solution is the only viable one. Separate, make no immediate judgement (hardest part), apply and initiate charges based SOLELY on the evidence.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 05:45 PM
3

This is why this Amber Heard trial has been SO important. It’s showing the whole country women will straight up LIE about DV for no other reason that to hurt a guy. They will even abuse a guy THEN say he abused them just hurt hurt him even more. It’s sad because this hurts real victims, but the liars are who need to be blamed and punished, so this doesn’t happen.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 05:42 PM
2

*legal maternal surrender
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:29 PM
3

If they have an MRA “bent” but still call themselves “feminists” it means they given up on the feminist arguments that they can’t win logically-which are almost all of them-but they still hold onto that feminist label because they believe they’re better than men.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 01:57 AM
2

I pity you for choosing to spend your time with undesirable men. Maybe you should make better choices with who you choose to spend your time with in the future.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 01:47 AM
4

This isn’t news
/r/MensRights02/05/22 08:14 PM
2

Losing our kids and property in a divorce, pretty much every time. Far more susceptible to homelessness than women: they have limitless resources; we have practically none. 50% more jail time for the same crime than women. Constant derision and disrespect, on a societal level. Abuse of boys and men are not only taken lightly, but are usually laughed at-even statutory r*pe of young boys. We are subject to the draft, women are not. Now, let’s here what the girls have to deal with…
/r/MensRights02/05/22 06:38 PM
4

Not for $20 bucks to a 60 year old crackhead. Maybe to their country for a cause greater than themselves. This person clearly didn’t even think this through for half a second.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 06:28 PM
1

There’s a reason we have softball beer leagues. You can easily hit a softball drunk. Baseball, now that takes a professional.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 09:26 PM
1

Invludinf me basically once a week. And feminists wrote it is off as “see the patriarchy hurts men too” or the even more callous “you deserve because of everything women had to go through.”
/r/MensRights01/05/22 05:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter