TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Chipdogs Archive

View 1 posts and 174 comments by Chipdogs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
22

Chipdogs/r/MensRights14/02/17 06:55 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

only in the West. In most other regions babies are just a fact of life.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 06:00 AM
1

A tryhard aussie broke into my room and molested me while yelling "aw strewth cobber"
/r/MensRights14/09/18 09:19 AM
1

Aw fucken hell mate look how ozzie I am can ya see I'm even using words like bloody and tool to accentuate what a fucken larrikin I am
/r/MensRights14/09/18 07:43 AM
2

so your claim is that stupid, irresponsible people will make use of contraceptives when they're free, and will not do so otherwise? A lot of them will, which stops them from becoming stupid irresponsible parents and stops millions more stupid irresponsible people from being created. Which is a net positive for society - reducing crime, reducing lifestyle illnesses, reducing welfare demand, reducing teen pregnancy, reducing school dropout rates, reducing the drain on the taxpayer dollar because a…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:47 AM
2

Again with the "should/shouldn't" argument. Neither does allowing them to have unwanted children that perpetuates the cycle of poverty. Believe it or not, wagging your finger at people and telling them not to have sex, actually doesn't stop them from having sex. However over time socializing birth control does reduce the amount of uneducated criminals in society which is better for the economy and makes a safer society. How exactly does providing free family planning encourage irresponsible beha…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:44 AM
4

They do this because the court system is overloaded from non violent drug offenders, they simply do not have enough time to try every single junkie.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:11 AM
2

So then you've got an underclass of disadvantaged unwanted children who are more likely to become criminals and more likely to be a drain on the public purse in multiple areas. Forget about this utopia where everyone does what they should be doing. It doesn't exist. This is the real world, and in the real world the smart thing to do is to look at the long term effects of policy regardless of how it makes you feel. Stupid uneducated irresponsible people exist, they are not going anywhere, so any …
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:07 AM
2

let me put it this way: What do you think of people who use welfare money to buy recreation gear? Imagine someone saves welfare checks and buys a jet ski or something similar, but they dont actually work for that money. Do you feel Satisfied, Dissatisfied, or highly dissatisfied that they are using the money they get on things to enjoy rather than necessities? Does the jet ski lead to a net savings for everyone in the future? Does it have knock on effects like reducing criminality in the populat…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:03 AM
2

Its incredible that abstinence is completely off the table as a responsible thing people can do themselves to protect not only themselves but 'future unwanted children'. Simply amazing. Not really if you knew anything at all about human nature.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:03 AM
4

Yeah we actually should, again this would save billions and free up a ton of load off the court system.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:01 AM
5

That's not even a health care issue. It is if you don't want society to be flooded with millions of unwanted children raised by single mothers, who will then be more likely to themselves have unwanted children or grow up into criminals. Birth control saves billions in the long run, there's no reason for it not to be socialized.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 05:50 AM
1

The safe, clean, no-risk proportion of the future is female. The rest of it is male, as per usual
/r/MensRights10/08/18 05:50 AM
-35

I am shocked and broken. No you're not. You heard some tragic news and felt sad for a few minutes. Stop being histrionic.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 05:35 AM
0

Idiot
/r/MensRights09/07/18 08:17 AM
1

"Tone policing" is just a thought terminating phrase this sub uses when some of its more pathetic behavior is called out. You’re wasting your time trying to talk sense here. Like every single other ideological group, it tends to become dominated by the weirdest and most fanatical people because they're the ones who will dedicate the most time and effort to it. Look at every other activist movement or ideology and you'll see it's pretty much the same. The more popular something is, the more idiot…
/r/MensRights09/07/18 08:17 AM
3

y'all lol well howdy pardner, either you come from the deep South or you're a pretentious hipster
/r/MensRights06/07/18 03:26 AM
-1

I'd be more worried about him finding places like /pol/ or any of those alt right youtube channels featuring people like Alex Jones or Richard Spencer. Hateful crazy ideas are much harder to dispel when they make people fell like part of the in-group.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 03:23 AM
0

Even when men wore skirts and makeup and wigs and powder, even then men were different from women. Those men were different from other MEN. Only the spoiled pampered aristocratic classes dressed like that, the majority of men laughed at them and thought they were fucking weird. If you went to a pub dressed like a dandy and didn't have a bodyguard you'd get mugged and beaten. The upper classes were considered practically a different species. Men have been pretty much the same throughout history. …
/r/MensRights15/06/18 07:36 AM
0

That's like calling your show "the cook show" because you cook in it. If English is your first language you'd call it "the cooking show".
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:24 AM
0

"Advise show"??? The word is "advice" for Christ's sake
/r/MensRights11/02/18 04:57 AM
23

Go watch a video of a circumcision and you'll quickly change your tune. It's misrepresented in the media as a quick snip of some useless skin. In reality the doctor peels the foreskin off the baby's penis, tearing the connective tissue, and then slices it off with a scalpel. You can quite obviously see how much excruciating pain the little baby is in from looking at his face and hearing his screams. It's pretty harrowing to watch and appalling to think that it's a widely accepted practice. "Welc…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 02:29 AM
29

I'm not an MRA, I just lurk here for the drama and outrage bait. I first heard of this place because my wife teaches abused and at-risk boys in a special school. She is way more up to date on all the unfairness that affects boys and young men than I am. She and her collegues are pretty much the only resource available for young boys with behavioral problems who can't attend normal schools, next stop is juvie. She is acutely aware of how little society cares about boys. It's safe to say that she …
/r/MensRights10/01/18 08:15 AM
2

It's just overcompensation for inadequacy. They know that as overweight unfit women they're impotent and powerless when it comes to physical strength so they compensate by fantasising about committing violence against men. They are exactly the same as those "incels" who fantasise about enslaving women.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:03 AM
-1

She didn't get "owned" both parties made good points and both parties spewed stupid rhetoric, same as any other political discussion
/r/MensRights21/11/17 04:56 AM
5

Women are the gatekeepers of masculinity
/r/MensRights21/11/17 04:44 AM
73

A narcissistic psycho who never faces consequences for her actions
/r/MensRights01/11/17 06:00 AM
3

No. It's important for boys to be allowed to participate in a male space with their peers and male role models. Like it or not, girls bring a different dynamic with their own social norms and problems, this is fact. Male bonding is incredibly important for adolescent boys to learn to become reliable, functioning men. It's good for boys to be around girls and vice versa but they also need single-sex time too. There are plenty of coed groups already.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:19 PM
3

Yeah looks to me like he asked a question in good faith and then got a bunch of assholes on his back about using a word they disapproved of. You should have been harsher towards the people derailing the post with petty complaints but I guess as a reddit mod you'll always show favoritism towards the clique
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:09 PM
11

Welcome to reddit, where real life problems are sidelined in favor of silly arbitrary rules invented by officious weirdos. Subreddit moderators are almost always fat obsessives who rule over their online territory like little totalitarian beaureocrats. The general rule is that unless a sub has a specific statement of free speech, chances are it's controlled by weird little nerds who love their own rules way too much.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 04:38 AM
1

If you ever care to actually give some evidence and prove it's not like the belief that earth is a sphere, I'll be around. What part of "I don't care what you believe" don't you understand? If you feel like clearing up your own ignorance, feel free to do that
/r/MensRights03/09/17 06:59 AM
1

So I will neither believe nor disbelieve your repeated unsourced unmeasured claims, because without evidence, they're meaningless hot air. And that's your choice to remain ignorant despite the facts being readily available as well as blindingly obvious to anyone with common sense. I'm on my phone at work, I can't be fucked indulging you by hunting for evidence of stuff I've already seen. I do not care what you think.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 06:45 AM
1

Lol all that just to say that you can't disprove the point but you just don't want it to be true
/r/MensRights03/09/17 06:34 AM
1

Great, well done. I notice you're having more trouble disproving anhthing else I said. Why so quick to jump on the sphere statement and not anything else?
/r/MensRights03/09/17 05:59 AM
5

Because it's mens' fault that women are vain and self absorbed
/r/MensRights03/09/17 05:52 AM
1

I already have established that they're facts, just like most of the air we breathe is made of nitrogen is an established fact. I don't have to find evidence for you because I know these are facts and I don't care if you accept them. Again, I'm not trying to convince you because I don't care if you choose to be ignorant. You can look for the evidence or counter evidence yourself if you feel like investigating, feel free to disprove anything I've said. You can also feel free to disprove the asser…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 05:41 AM
1

You make the mistake of thinking I'm trying to convince you of anything. I don't care if you believe facts or not, just like I don't care whether you believe you're breathing nitrogen right now. Women are not as dangerous or as aggressive as men, they do not commit violent crime at the same rate, and they do not form powerful criminal organizations. Those are facts whether you choose to accept them or not.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 06:41 AM
1

Feel free to find one single powerful majority female criminal gang on a par with the AB, I imagine I'll be waiting a while. The most you'll be able to find is small time mugging and pickpocketing. Women just aren't as ruthless and they are a lot more risk averse. Besides this, if one were to form it would get destroyed pretty quickly by some other criminal syndicate that was male.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 03:16 AM
1

I'm stupid for asserting that male prisoners are generally more dangerous and that mens prisons house the most dangerous inmates? Are you serious with this shit?
/r/MensRights02/09/17 01:58 AM
1

In fact there are no powerful majority female criminal gangs in existence anywhere. If you can't figure out what that means in regard to how dangerous women are compared to men, you've got something wrong with you.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 01:57 AM
1

Are you stupid? Do you really think there's any significant female presence in the AB?
/r/MensRights02/09/17 01:55 AM
1

There's no female equivalent of the Aryan Brotherhood, that alone should tell you something
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:36 AM
1

Just because you're ignorant doesn't mean facts aren't facts. If a female prisoner is too dangerous a lot of the time she'll get moved to a male prison, this doesn't happen often.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:35 AM
4

A hell of a lot less than what goes on in mens' prisons. Male prisoners are undisputedly far more brutal and dangerous.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 03:40 PM
28

It's true, girls probably wouldn't use brutal savage violence. However they'd probably build some kind of committee based hierarchy with a queen bee at the top, and indirectly kill girls they didn't like by exiling them from the group to starve. Girls are all about status and exclusion, they're obsessed with it.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 09:03 AM
0

If women suddenly disappeared, it would be a catastrophe... but in general, we would recover within a year. No we wouldn't. The only reason men maintain society is for women and children. That's why civilization exists. There would be no future and thus no reason to do anything. Society would largely collapse even though most of the labor force would still exist.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 08:49 AM
2

"Delays puberty", people say this so casually, as if it comes with no consequences, when in reality it causes permanent damage. If you give hormone blockers to a pubescent boy he'll end up with a micropenis. That's straight up child abuse.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:20 AM
1

Nah he's powerful, wealthy, and high status so naturally they all like him
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:10 AM
1

If you'd never been conscious before then yes, that would be fine
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:05 AM
1

It's not censorship unless they've got the power to actually censor, you stupid fuck. It's just an opinion that makes you whine like a bitch. Jesus Christ how can you not understand this. Freedom of speech means people can say whatever they like, including that content shouldn't be posted or that certain people shouldn't be on the sub. As long as it doesn't break any rules and they're not affecting people's ability to post, they can say anything and it's all covered under freedom of speech. This…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 08:19 PM
1

No idiot, let me spell it out for you: people are allowed to disagree with the content of what is posted. That is the part of freedom of speech that you don't seem to fucking get. Jesus how dense can you possibly be
/r/MensRights17/06/17 04:56 PM
1

Learn what freedom of speech means, moron. Hint: it means that people are allowed to disagree...
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:05 AM
1

lol have you ever seen a womens' magazine? They're not exactly bastions of fair and balanced journalism
/r/MensRights16/06/17 09:14 AM
1

Yeah yeah rant more you crazy hateful little toerag. You're doing a great job of showing just what type of person you are.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:29 AM
2

You could write for Jezebel or Huffington Post
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:21 AM
2

Oh fuck off you dumb racist trash.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:14 AM
1

His perspective is valuable whether its genuine or devils advocate. A space where everyone agrees with each other is worthless for actual constructive discussion.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:35 AM
5

Stfu he can express whatever opinion he wants. Freedom of speech, learn what it means bitch
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:30 AM
1

Jesus that's fucking cold.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 08:07 AM
1

All this argument is unnecessary. Just post a link to a video of an actual circumcision. The restraints, lack of anesthetic, and slicing pain that the baby is obviously feeling is all the argument you need. I feel like a lot of these women wouldn't be so blasé about circumcision if they actually knew what it was. Show them a video of a baby being strapped down and then someone slicing into his penis with a scalpel, make them listen to his agonized screams, and then ask them if that's what they w…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:45 AM
2

Go and watch a video of a baby being circumcised and then see if you still hold that opinion
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:36 AM
38

100% of the focus has to be on women, all the time, otherwise the feminists will throw a tantrum. It's just man hate, pure and simple. They're not even trying to pretend any more
/r/MensRights01/06/17 05:13 AM
15

I am not "this sub" I don't speak for anyone else and nobody else speaks for me. You seem pretty fragile, maybe you'd be more at home somewhere that doesn't allow free expression. The reality is that underneath all the spin, feminism is becoming more and more like a cult for spoiled western millenials. All its most popular talking points are at best, opinions presented as fact, or at worst, lies. The statue is not just an inanimate object, it's a symbol and as it turns out it's ironically symbol…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:20 AM
3

I'm going to put my money on this being another hoax
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:20 AM
82

That fearless girl statue is stupid anyway. If anything it represents overconfidence, entitlement, naivety and shelteredness in the face of harsh inescapable reality. In short, she can be as fearless as she wants, it's not going to stop her from being trampled.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:19 AM
3

Feminism has turned into a full blown religion that people have to deprogram themselves from
/r/MensRights31/05/17 03:52 AM
5

Welcome to every single online space controlled by women, where the content is as bland and inoffensive as possible and they'll ban you for disagreeing
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:52 AM
15

Lol of course they don't go to bars, they're a bunch of socially anxious self hating numales interspersed with a few fat ugly women. Most of them have never hooked up with a member of the opposite sex in their life, they've got no clue what normal social interaction looks like. They feel threatened by normal men and envious of attractive women.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:43 AM
6

It's because women are more likely to attend an event if they feel they're being given special treatment, and men are more likely to attend if they think there will be lots of women. Like it or not, the number of women in attendance can make or break a social event like this.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:38 AM
2

Welcome to the internet, you may want to go away and come back when you've grown a thicker skin
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:35 AM
1

Move to a jungle village in South East Asia. That's my plan for my late 40's, I've got a location picked out and everything. Fuck dying to the rat race.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 05:31 AM
10

It happens shockingly frequently, my uncle was blackmailed with sexual harassment allegations, the woman told him that she'd make it all go away if he gave her a glowing reference for a new position she wanted. He contacted some of her previous bosses and apparently she'd done it at least 3 times before and had been climbing up the ranks by blackmailing her male bosses. So far nothing has happened to her.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:43 AM
3

Par for the course with that subreddit, most of the posters are morons and the advice usually sucks.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:38 AM
2

Except women are the ones who are most likely to question someone's masculinity because for them there's much less of a threat of physical retaliation. And women are effectively the gatekeepers of masculinity because they can either elevate or humiliate a man with just a few words.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:30 AM
12

Fake and gay 0/10 would not bang
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:20 AM
3

One of my clients is an Iranian woman and she tells me that it IS a hellhole, especially in regards to animal cruelty, so I think it depends on perspective. I think specifically whether you're from a rich family or not. Also she is non Muslim.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 07:55 AM
0

This just sounds like she's deliberately being a tease, not that she's complaining about men. You guys need to grow thicker skins.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 09:27 AM
2

Sorry mate but the world isn't always a safe place, you take a risk every time you walk out your front door
/r/MensRights12/05/17 01:10 PM
4

Why? There's a ton to learn for any new parent and young men learning these things from older men is very good for society as a whole
/r/MensRights11/05/17 06:07 AM
3

TIL hitting leopards with nerf bats contributes to the future of Western society and ensures it's population doesn't die out
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:51 AM
1

That's because feminism isn't a civil rights movement any more, it's just a giant mean girls clique. It's dominated by spoiled bored women who don't actually give a shit about fairness or accuracy, they just want to control the discourse and for you to know that it's them who is controlling it.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:45 AM
1

You already said that you didn't record the convo so how could you possibly confirm it.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 03:03 AM
8

This is possibly the most spoiled white girl sentence I have ever read in my entire life
/r/MensRights25/04/17 08:42 AM
1

This is fake as shit. There's no way CPS would flat out deny that a woman could abuse children, they see it literally every day.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 07:13 AM
28

This is pretty textbook narcissism.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 10:14 AM
2

The little girl can be as fearless and defiant as she likes, it's not going to stop her being gored and trampled
/r/MensRights14/04/17 09:15 AM
4

There's nothing inherently wrong with this. It's just the lack of balance that is the issue.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 10:10 AM
5

Why should anyone care about you and your poblems then?
/r/MensRights12/04/17 09:23 AM
4

The thing is men might just be more inclined to pursuing other careers right so why force a change? They are at the moment with the modern feminized education system. But don't forget that 100 years ago teachers were mostly male, and the system catered to boys a lot more.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:57 AM
1

Other research suggests that children can see better when not wearing a blindfold, and most surprising of all, that they can run faster if their legs aren't tied together.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 06:16 AM
2

Gaming is male entertainment, of course there will be people who make up lies to demonize and delegitemize it
/r/MensRights07/04/17 09:04 AM
1

No it doesn't, she can get out any time she wants
/r/MensRights06/04/17 03:05 AM
4

Is anyone really surprised by this? Women love exclusion and exclusivity, it starts when they're in kindergarten. There is stacks of literature detailing queen bee behavior in little girls. High school girls have popularity contests and mercilessly bully the uncool kids. Women love reality TV where contestants are voted off based on who is the least popular. Is it really any wonder that advertisers exploit this ingrained mentality in adult women? The only women it doesn't work on are those who d…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 07:11 PM
14

It's not going to change until women stop getting social status for being victims. When men are victims, they're seen as failures and it makes people uncomfortable. When women are victims, people fall over themselves to help and give sympathy. This is one of the real reasons behind the so called empathy gap.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 02:55 AM
4

It's not about when you were born, it's about life experience and political awareness. There's a reason why most Marxists are high school and college students
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:58 AM
1

I'm totally projecting so hard because I chose not to bash woman and approached the problem as not being a black and white male vs female problem. Nah you're just trolling people who recount stories of their abuse, I bet you also do that to women right? I bet you just got done typing "yeah but dae fuck all men amiright" over on r/twoxchromosomes in response to some woman telling about how her boyfriend beat her. Because you're just the best kind of equality troll, right? No I don't think this su…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:58 PM
1

Oh so you're mad because my comment sounded rude. Got it. lol the lack of self awareness is really entertaining. I'm not "mad" you poor dumb bastard. I feel sorry for you because you're an ignorant bigot. Your brain is so full of tribalistic crap that you're unable to converse like a rational adult. But by all means, keep downplaying your ridiculous and infantile behavior, you've only got yourself to fool. I AM BEING OPPRESSED BY DA MALE POLICE OFFICER. FUCK WOMAN! Did I get it right this time? …
/r/MensRights22/03/17 11:58 AM
1

I identified the problem. You actually think that there's something here to argue about. No you didn't. You made a silly baseless claim with no proof, in between making silly trollish comments, one was towards a guy who was telling about his abusive relationship. Do you think the equivalent comment would have been acceptable towards a woman recounting her abuse at the hands of a man? Be honest with yourself. I'm not hateful. I just think your opinion is shit Ignoring the obvious and laughable ox…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:07 AM
2

Nah, I think that's just a very thin excuse to cover up the real reason, which is that people who censor are insecure and not confident that their ideology can stand on it's own merits. I'm not even an MRA, I think they're whiny pussies about a lot of things. I think the movement is way too concerned with being like the male version of feminism instead of tackling the shit that really matters. But they let me stay here and I respect them a lot more than anyone who can't hack being disagreed with…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:58 PM
7

And yet here you are, allowed to keep posting and with all your posts undeleted. Try doing this level of trolling on any of the subs that hate this sub, and see how quickly they ban you.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:29 AM
2

The burden of proof is not a new concept. If you make a claim, you cite your sources. If anything it's the internet that has made people lazy enough to think that other people should go find their sources for them...
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:27 AM
3

Don't forget about mansplaining, that is one of the prominent issues facing women of our time
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:37 AM
4

Because religion
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:35 AM
4

Part of learning how to think is learning what the burden of proof is.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:34 AM
2

Back up your claims with evidence. It's pretty simple. It's not anyone else's job to go find evidence for you.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:33 AM
11

This is a human brain on feminism...
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:31 AM
2

She's a pretty white girl, they can literally get away with murder.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 07:36 AM
1

Makes you wonder why Liz and Heather didn't just do it themselves if they're so smart
/r/MensRights17/03/17 08:57 AM
3

That's like saying the guys who made the tiles for the rocket's hull are the reason behind Nasa sending a man to space. It misrepresents the way everyone contributed and played a part and tries to present a few individuals as having disproportionate influence.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 08:54 AM
3

The bechdel test is feminist propaganda in itself. It's not a well thought out theory, it's literally a couple of panels from a silly comic strip. People like it because it sounds scientific and official. It's a great example of how feminists will bandwagon something without fully understanding it.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 02:08 AM
8

This type of woman are constantly trying to get attention and social status. They can get it from dating an attractive dude, or they can get it from rejecting guys they deem to be beneath them. Women get social points from being victims, while men don't. If women got told to shut up and grow a pair every time they pretended to be scared of an unattractive man, they'd stop doing it because it would hurt their social standing. With these type of woman everything is about how they appear to others.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 10:07 AM
2

Beitbart is a platform for the alt-right, that's not an empty accusation, it's according to its former executive chairman. It is not a reputable or reliable news source.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 04:20 AM
1

This is not someone you guys want on your sub, Conway is scum and doesn't have an honest bone in her body
/r/MensRights27/02/17 04:31 AM
1

Does that nihilist version of "man up" work for you? It makes me hate you and everyone else. Seriously, opposite effect. "Man up" works for me, but then again I don't have a chemical imbalance in my brain. Sorry but this is the way it's been since the stone age and beyond. Men don't get a free ride, we either adapt to the challenges we face in life, or we die. Sometimes we die anyway. Women get support and care because they're weak and vulnerable, and because they carry the next generation. If t…
/r/MensRights27/02/17 04:07 AM
10

Oh shut up. We put women's voices in robots because they're more pleasant to listen to. Stop acting like a feminist.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 03:27 PM
15

Telling a woman to smile is a form of gender-based harassment and it can happen anywhere, including your own home. Bored, spoiled, sheltered western woman has no idea what harassment is
/r/MensRights26/02/17 03:25 PM
18

I choose to believe that this person wrote the article in order to make selfish crazy feminazis do nice things for dudes.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:23 AM
1

Lol it's "Devil's advocate"
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:20 AM
1

I'm not an MRA but I do think feminism is bullshit. I think my wife would be an MRA if she used reddit. She teaches at a boys' school for at risk youth, she often comes home and rants about the demonisation of males in our society and how nobody cares about boys. There's one particularly toxic feminist propaganda campaign making the rounds at the moment called "the line" that she absolutely hates. These people are crazy, check out their website: www.theline.org.au
/r/MensRights14/02/17 06:43 AM
1

MtF is about 2 to 3 times more common. https://tgmentalhealth.com/tag/prevalence/
/r/MensRights09/02/17 07:21 AM
1

But a 6"5 man who has done the same amount of crossfit is more likely to make a better firefighter, as he'll have stronger bones, better endurance, and much greater upper body strength. Women's physical limit is much, much lower than men's. On an even playing field, men outperform women every time.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 04:23 AM
1

Well there are far more mtf transsexuals than ftm. That just seems to be a universal fact, there's no point getting upset about it
/r/MensRights09/02/17 03:28 AM
1

A stopped clock is right twice a day. DeVos is a moron who has no business being anywhere near th education system.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 03:19 AM
2

I agree but it's not like feminists don't do the same thing. Milo is just the Conservative equivalent of Anita Sarkeesian or Clementine Ford.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 11:46 PM
12

People say that until they actually see a video of a circumcision performed on a baby. Watch his little toes curl in pain and listen to him scream and you'll quickly change your tune.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 08:26 AM
1

Yeah great idea I'm sure your mate would love being locked in a truck cab with Chanty Binx for 10 hours
/r/MensRights30/01/17 03:35 AM
1

When /pol's views aren't extreme enough, maybe you should sit back and examine your life
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:53 AM
1

They're just sheltered in their bubbles of safety and wealth. The truth is that men are the backbone of society and always have been. Men build the infrastructure, transport the goods, remove the trash, make the amenities, and respond to emergencies. If all the men stopped working there would be no electricity, no fuel, no maintenance, no emergency services, no armed forces, etc etc. If all the women stopped working society would just return to the 19th century. On some level women know this, mo…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:57 AM
0

Oh fuck off with your buzzwords, can't you do anything more than parrot what you read on /pol?
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:27 AM
15

Crybullies
/r/MensRights24/01/17 06:47 AM
1

It's very likely that Manson shot and killed several people, it was just never proven
/r/MensRights24/01/17 06:41 AM
13

Huffington Post is a really great argument against Feminism.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 03:34 PM
1

Who's the bigger loser, the guy with a small cock or the skank who dates him, calls him a loser and then cheats with guys who would never actually commit to her?
/r/MensRights06/01/17 03:32 PM
56

It's surreal that a crazy person can just use the system like their own personal weapon to get attention and revenge. Even more surreal that actual people witnessed her unhinged behavior and still went along with it. Kind of reminiscent of the Salem witch hunts.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 03:25 PM
2

It's just that they are easy targets. Feminists hardly ever attack powerful people.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 04:11 AM
8

Short answer is because the state doesn't want to pay for it
/r/MensRights22/10/16 12:03 AM
7

Fail troll 0/10 would not bang
/r/MensRights22/10/16 12:01 AM
4

Before you downvote check out my post history and you'll see that I'm an MRA. Who cares if you are or you aren't? I'm not and I still post here. Regarding the article, they are under the false impression that being a housewife is the same amount of work as a full time job. It's not. Housewives cook and clean but full time employed people do all that AND work 40+ hours a week. The duties of a housewife are nowhere near 8 hours a day and require no commuting either.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:27 AM
2

Don't be like the feminists and laugh when terrible things (that usually happen to men) happen to women. You guys have to be better than that. There's no need for sarcasm here, what happened to this girl was terrible and a violation of justice. It probably would not have happened if she was pretty, which makes it even more fucked up.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:18 AM
13

Feminism is behaving like a religion and it's trying to indoctrinate a new generation of children.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 03:34 PM
3

Trump shows up how obscenely self absorbed American women are. This is a man who has said that he wants to torture people and use nukes. But they never even mention those things in their petulant outrage against him. All American women care about is that he made some grotty sexist comments. Really highlights their priorities.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 10:07 AM
5

Shouting at your kid is a crime now?
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:32 AM
6

"The shocking message", the way they describe it shows just how much of an aberration society considers it to rudely reject a woman
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:29 AM
2

I can be unemotional and not have people think there's something wrong with me.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 10:23 AM
2

Women have reproductive choice, men can only choose whether to have sex or not.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 09:19 AM
8

Disgusting woman, and a habitual liar.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 05:09 PM
6

It's necessary for defendants' names to be public record because it prevents the police/courts from carrying out secret trials and making people disappear.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 05:07 PM
5

Hating your own gender because of the stupidity of a few is just pointless. It makes you look no better than those pathetic self-loathing male feminists. Love your gender, love the other gender, protect both from stupidity by staying rational and level headed
/r/MensRights24/08/16 04:55 AM
2

How about just don't hate? Hate is such an irrational and unhelpful emotion. I can't think of one situation that's remedied by introducing hate.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 04:52 AM
1

What the fuck did you just fucking say about me you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 08:34 AM
1

Whoa, internet tough guy right here
/r/MensRights19/08/16 08:06 AM
1

Gotta preserve the narrative
/r/MensRights19/08/16 07:12 AM
1

It's oversensitive because he expects random strangers to stop saying certain words. It would be far more sensible to just get over it and accept that sometimes people are going to say things that you don't like. There's no "backlash". People with cerebral palsy aren't worse off because the word "spastic" was colloquially appropriated. The world isn't politically correct. Learn to deal with it.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 07:34 PM
1

Lots of words get colloquially appropriated to mean other things. Get over it.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 01:07 PM
1

Yep, it's oversensitive - there's criticizing words because they're stupid, and then there's criticizing them because you've got a thin skin.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 12:31 PM
-1

It's what happens when any ideological movement reaches a certain population. The average IQ level drops and the collective voice gets stupider. It becomes primarily about self righteousness and outrage because that's what the masses of morons enjoy, they are intoxicating and addictive emotional states. This rule applies pretty much everywhere.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:53 AM
0

This is an advocacy sub, nuance is not a thing here
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:36 AM
1

Policing people's language is futile and pointless and just makes you look like a whiney bitch.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:33 AM
1

Just lapping up that victimhood aren't you. Take it easy, Anita.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 12:30 AM
1

Now you're crying and playing the victim? Are you sure you're not the SJW here? You're definitely dishonest enough to be
/r/MensRights28/07/16 10:44 PM
1

You're like a lying hypocritical moron who says stupid shit on the internet.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 10:33 PM
1

Go look at my post history and then call me a feminist again you presumptuous moron. Wow everyone who disagrees with you must be a feminist or an SKW huh? You haven't helped or adopted any children, you're just another irrational right winger who lies on the internet rather than admit he's a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 10:24 PM
1

So you're standing by your statement that there's only 2 Muslim countries in the world that force women to cover up? I will say it again, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Sit down and let the adults talk.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 09:39 PM
1

So 0 then. Which means you'll piss and moan about "killing children" when they're just pin sized embryos, but at the end of the day, it's always someone else's job to adopt the thousands of unwanted kids. Religious hypocrisy at it's finest.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 09:34 PM
0

I haven't killed any, nor have I ever had any abortions. So are you going to tell me how many children you've adopted?
/r/MensRights28/07/16 09:49 AM
1

That statement shows you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 09:47 AM
-1

Why do you need to know why I'm asking? It's a straightforward question. Is the answer 0?
/r/MensRights28/07/16 05:52 AM
3

Yeah that's why most of the qualified chefs in the world are women, oh wait
/r/MensRights28/07/16 05:06 AM
-1

Just interested. So how many?
/r/MensRights28/07/16 05:03 AM
1

They'll do just fine being segregated, forced to wear "modest" clothing and being compared to covered/uncovered confectionary, you mean?
/r/MensRights28/07/16 05:01 AM
0

Just interested but how many kids have you adopted?
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:50 AM
21

Unfortunately the identity of the accused being on public record is important, it prevents secret arrests and secret courts from operating. By knowing the identity of the accused we know that the police and courts can't just make them disappear.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:46 AM
7

They already are, when was the last time you saw an action or sci-fi film where a skinny woman didn't beat up a bunch of large musclebound men?
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:03 AM
2

Do your research. Sources from the US army and CIA have said it will refuse to follow illegal orders from Trump to torture and kill the families of terrorists. You mindless Trump supporters have no idea what's really going on here. All you see is your favorite reality tv star. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/02/28/former-cia-director-military-may-refuse-to-follow-trumps-orders-if-he-becomes-president/
/r/MensRights31/05/16 12:51 AM
5

Pretty good way of putting it. I understand why he's got so much support but at the same time this is a man who the US army have said they will not take orders from (specifically referencing Trump's stance on dealing with terrorism). The guy is a narcissist and a boor. It's shocking and saddening that he's come this far already.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 04:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter