TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Chrispy3690 Archive

View 4 posts and 110 comments by Chrispy3690 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Sure. But what evidence suggests he was assaulted? Feelings aren't the reality, necessarily, but they are factual in that they exist. Feelings like being violated. He's not claiming he feels victimized. That's a fact.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:11 PM
0

You're speaking for the victim in a way that I don't see in the article at all. If he doesn't feel like he was assaulted, and there's no evidence to suggest he was, should you really be saying he was?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:39 PM
0

It's only non-consensual after the fact (ie after the blackout). You're conscious during a blackout and able to render consent adequately. It's like having your memory erased. If you lose a memory that doesn't mean you weren't completely coherent during the time the memory happened. Also, I didn't see anything that suggests he's claiming assault at all.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:36 PM
-1

Nope. He's not claiming the assault. There's no issue about whether he was assaulted at all. He participated in a consensual sex act while blacked out and the girl is claiming SHE was assaulted.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:12 PM
1

Women are often too stupid to do what's good for themselves. Err... Most men are too stupid to deal with women err... um... Rape is good wait Rape is bad! Ya! that one. *EDIT: Seriously, total nonsense. I just spent like 20min in showerthoughts and I can't get stupid silly things out of my head. Ignore this please.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 06:46 PM
4

Let's just hope the child grows up to sue the fuck out of his dad and state.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 06:42 PM
9

Blacked out isn't the same as "passed out." He was conscious of what he was doing but he doesn't remember it. He should be responsible for doing whatever he did while intoxicated. If he sexually assaulted someone while drunk, that doesn't mean he didn't sexually assault them. The issue at hand is this guy getting expelled for receiving a blow job. That is ridiculous. But the headline really doesn't make that obvious. That's like saying you shouldn't go to jail for driving in a blackout and hitti…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 06:25 PM
1

I'm ok with this, so long as it applies equally to men and women. The main reason being that, if you were the victim of a sex crime, particularly as a child and it took you until you were an adult to really come to terms with the abuses you suffered, this leaves the door open. It's much more likely that someone is going to get away with a 15yr old crime than get accused of one erroneously. I see this as the lesser of the 2 evils.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 09:27 PM
2

This is fine with me so long as women are forced to be sterilized. At least temporarily. Maybe until like 30.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:10 PM
6

I made a post about a year ago when that report came out in r/AskFeminists saying something to the extent: "Now that RAINN declared 'Rape Culture' non-existent, what should we rename it?" They didn't get the joke and fucking exploded.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:37 PM
1

The last sentence: Prosecutors have no plans to investigate or file any charges regarding filing a false report against the passenger...
/r/MensRights07/04/15 11:35 PM
1

I really do want to be sympathetic here but, it's like, "Well... that beats getting into a fight every day for a spot on the job van."
/r/MensRights26/03/15 10:01 PM
1

I don't believe 2 is accurate. However, we are seeing that domestic violence (please note that, before I say this, I'm not at all condoning it or making any excuses for the perpetrators) is overwhelmingly initiated by women. Women are more likely to get seriously hurt but they often strike first. I can provide sources but google is your friend on this one.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 11:54 PM
0

The article points to differences in males and females citing: Individuals often react to these examples in one of two ways. Either they jump to the conclusion that any straight-identified man who engages in sexual contact with another man must actually be gay or bisexual, or they dismiss the behavior as not actually sexual. Rather, they interpret it as an expression of dominance, a desire to humiliate, or some other ostensibly “non sexual” male impulse. But these responses merely reveal our cul…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 11:13 PM
1

I appreciate your zeal but this is unhelpful. The OP is asking for sources.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 10:55 PM
0

I understand your point and there is some merit to it: Imagine a pair of chess players. One of them (Call them "Y") is self taught and understands the game instinctually. The other ("X") is taught alongside a group of other chess students by a tutor of some kind. While Y figures out the game and the rules and becomes quite adept at navigating the game, X isn't driven by the same desire but, rather, forced to play. And because X isn't as enthusiastic about learning the rules and strategies, X doe…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 10:52 PM
1

Only one gender gets to feel sexually desired as an engineer, and I'll give you a hint: it's not men. But wait... if it's not men then... uh...OH! oh... I see what you did there.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 12:47 AM
0

What's that? Girls play differently that boys do? Why hasn't anyone noticed this before!? The injustice of differing interests! I suppose next we should claim toy cars and actions figures and video games create a hostile environment for girls, and should be made to be more gender inclusive despite 'most' girls having NO interested in those things. Ya, this caught my attention too. It turns out that boys and girls like to play with different things. We didn't just make up shit at random as being …
/r/MensRights26/02/15 12:37 AM
19

Don't forget the part where she follows that up with things like; "exasperated sigh You're just like your father..."
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:50 PM
30

Correction: Show a pic of a man to a woman and she will give him a 4. The same source for the above (OKTrends) shows us, as we've all seen before, women find 80% of men are "below average" in looks.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 08:35 PM
4

I think it's important to note here that Marriage isn't necessary. Ask yourself, ask any woman, why do you want to get married? The answer, at the root of it, is always, "just because." There's nothing special about marriage except the title. You can be bonded with someone indefinitely without having to go through all that nonsense.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 01:54 AM
1

I'm not into political science but, while not denying the existence of a plutocracy, I don't think that's what feminisms is trying to "dismantle." I think "Patriarchy," as defined by feminism, is more like a culture than it is a government.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 10:21 PM
1

"What's the useless skin surrounding the vagina?"
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 12:07 AM
2

/u/Drrrrrr might have a source but this seems almost self-evident to me. He spelled it out really well too which was good on his part. We know that all organisms find ways of selecting for genetic traits. Just like a bird that can mimic the plumage of a much more robust member of his species, so too can humans mimic our genetically superior competitors. /u/Drrrrrr got it right when he said it was simplistic because humans have known about this ability for thousands of years. But it hasn't been a…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/15 11:32 PM
4

I've had an itching thought that there's a genetic basis for men and women's tendency to stay in a relationship for certain amounts of time. It's basically that we're monogamous long enough to raise an infant to the point the infant doesn't need constant attention and the female/male can move on to another mate. I don't know if there's a way to test for this at this point but it'd be interesting to see if there was a genetic component.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/15 05:50 AM
8

I've been trying to pin down what "The Patriarchy" actually is, in societal terms. I had a thought that fits here, perhaps you can chime in; I think the Patriarchy might just be shorthand for male sexuality. Obviously there's the element of patrilineality. But I'm talking more about the optimization of male sexual strategy. So when feminists talk about taking down The Patriarchy, they're really talking about destroying the system of social controls which have optimized male sexual strategy and h…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 02:52 AM
1

Funny you mentioned reality when you're still so plugged in you think playing beta is different than being beta. You keep faking it till you make the "beta game" work. Let us know how that works out in the end.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 05:00 AM
1

Actually, I also need to add that I think you're missing the key word here which is RELIES. I disagree with any strategy which RELIES on dishonesty. Both men's and women's strategies. It's all amoral anyways and lying isn't necessarily wrong in some of these cases. But I'm saying I disagree with NEEDING to be dishonest in order to consistently optimize your strategy.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 05:25 AM
-2

The point isn't that women aren't dishonest. The point is, if you're gonna get on your high horse about it, that you're better than that, right? You're a man not a woman. A woman uses dishonesty and deceit. You're not a woman are you?
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 05:21 AM
2

I hope this is sarcasm because, if not, you're so wrong. The honest man is EXACTLY who you can and will con. Those are the marks.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 05:19 AM
-1

This seems like a viable strategy for wasting time. There might be a few women who would be desperate enough to be closed on a first date, simply by law of averages. But I have to disagree with any strategy that relies on dishonesty. Just IMO.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 12:24 AM
1

No, my statement was on point. I wasn't talking about the women in any way. My devil's advocate was to point out that calling the guy who gets the girl an "asshole" is equivalent to whining. The real asshole is the guy who complains about not being as effective in his strategy as the "asshole" in his narrative.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 08:21 PM
3

Ya, this. I'm on the periphery of the BDSM community in my area (a few plates into fetish modeling and been to a few geek parties) and everyone I've heard talk about this series is underwhelmed with how romanticised it is. As if these were new ideas and concepts which are so crazy-taboo that no one has fantasized about them before. BDSM does nothing for me so I don't participate much and I'm still underwhelmed by how juvenile it is.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 12:32 AM
0

Not disagreeing but I want to also play devil's advocate here: Those assholes are the same guys who banged her and now she's lamenting over them. So who's the asshole now?
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 11:14 PM
2

Well, when I said "better" I misspoke. I should have said "different" I meant better in terms of ability to self-regulate. Plenty of those women exist. I think it's important to note here that selecting different romantic partners requires personal work and not just a "decision" to do things differently. You're not going to just magically start attracting different people until you've made significant progress on yourself. Yes, it is easier said than done. But usually it's not something you do e…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 10:53 PM
5

I wish I could reply to all replies in this comment and other related comments but hopefully this will suffice: I will attest that AWALT, as far as I can tell. HOWEVER, the type of women you choose will determine how much of this crap you have to put up with. The cliche about women picking the same asshole over and over isn't much different for men. Men will pick the same woman over and over. Freudian thought would suggest this "selector" is aimed at our primary relationships from birth. The poi…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 09:20 PM
2

I can understand feeling that kind of boost, I've been there. But don't rest on your laurels, as they say. Imagine, if you will, that this is how things SHOULD have been from the beginning. You were in the negatives. Now you're at a net total of 0. NOW is where you begin.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 08:05 PM
1

I've heard from MANY women that they consider blowjobs as more intimate than sex. So, in this case, it might be a sign of interest more-so than "mere sex" for them. I've never understood this perspective but I suppose having a dick inside you but further away from your head (where we consider our "self" to exist) might be less personal - I dunno.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 02:38 AM
6

I agree. This is sexual exhibitionism in a way. I think, more importantly, it's just a validation thing. women would rather share a high SMV man than to be exclusive to a low SMV man. This guy is assuming that, because this woman is sleeping with him, he has a higher SMV than most. I'm not saying he doesn't but it's this overt statement that screams "Acknowledge I'm special!" Really, no offense intended but these posts are all over the place and seem to be just a way to self-sooth. As per this p…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 10:01 PM
2

they provide an outlet for your competitive masculine urges and instincts. The joy of exploration, the need for adventure, the desperate yearning for competition... When you get that through a game, you reach a point of satiety and don't seek it in real life. Why isn't this being talked about more? This bit of information seems so on point that I'm having a hard time getting past just this. I'm not sure if the OP has a source to backup this theory but there should absolutely be someone looking i…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 07:56 PM
6

Holly Kearl, founder of the nonprofit Stop Street Harassment, has described how promoting a culture of catcalling can lead to even more severe problems. "The acceptance of street harassment, the portrayal of it as a compliment or a joke, creates a culture where it is normal to disrespect someone or to comment on them or to touch them without their consent," she told Ebony last year. "That culture helps make rape okay and lets rapists get away with their crime." I wanna see the study that shows A…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 10:42 PM
1

whoa there, slow down the assumption train. A) I never said anything about what I personally did or didn't want. B) You're not a kid (I assume). As an adult, I, and presumably you, would prefer to earn it. But that's based on adult reasoning. The child would rather just be given things. That's, IMO, part of the definition of being a child. And that's why I argued the kid would, objectively, enjoy the gift more than the adult would enjoy getting a new car. Internally the satisfaction for the adul…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 10:34 PM
5

The kid. The man earned it through hard work and can "appreciate" it. The kid just get's all the pleasure with none of the sacrifice. The boy just has the exuberance of youth to "appreciate" a Ferrari. But that's a lot of energy which the man doesn't have.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 08:02 PM
3

Seriously. Do a bit a research. There are hundreds of threads just on this site alone where women are outright asking if they were raped because they had sex while drunk even though they wanted to at the time. It's abhorrent.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 06:08 AM
9

Then you haven't been looking very hard. There's literally thousands of stories of women and men who were drunk and had drunken "consensual" sex and then the man was convicted of rape because the woman was drunk. That's kinda one of the issues with the whole rape problem to begin with. That's why there's a flow-chart. That shit is real. And prevalent.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:31 AM
8

If both parties are active and explicit in their consent then probably no crime has been committed. Not according to... like... a million cases of "rape" where both parties were drunk, and willing, during the act but only one of the parties faced legal consequences due to one of the party cough being "unwilling" afterwards. js...
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:58 AM
3

No... it talks about penetrative sex. It doesn't say whether you were the penetrator or penetrated. It simply asks if you had penetrative sex (oral, anal, vaginal penetration).
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:43 AM
11

“Sure, if my husband made so much money that I could spend time with the kids, still afford great vacations and maybe the occasional baby sitter to take a class or go out with friends, I’d be the first to sign up, ... So maybe while it’s a luxury I do think about, it’s not one I would want unless it was actually luxurious. I don’t want to be a stay at home mom who clips coupons or plans her weekly menu to make ends meet… If that’s the case, I’d gladly go on working to avoid that fate.” Wow... en…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 07:12 PM
1

If the female in question proves to be just as competent and effective, would you still be making this argument?
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 05:35 AM
1

You go to an army base and tell some grunts that they've been feminized and are no longer men. That they're losing their spine and balls. Let me know how that works out for you. Quotas exist, sure, but they're not blanket quotas for everything all the time. They've been instituted in places where it was demonstrated that men were getting preferential treatment even when their female peers equalled or surpassed them in competency and achievement. But, even so, the quotas don't necessarily mean th…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 09:23 PM
2

Arnold Schwarzenegger is... The Repo-cussionator!
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 08:35 PM
0

Awww, I missed it. What did it say?
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 08:27 PM
1

There's a difference between wanting to replace and wanting to add. It's not women's fault that there are only so many jobs available and only so many college openings. There are more female workers in many areas of our economy, and as a trend, men are dropping out of the work force in ever increasing numbers. You're implying that because more women are working and going to school that men are leaving. It's this kind of magical causal invention that's so detrimental to TRP. Women aren't being FO…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 06:27 PM
0

Men and women experience emotions, thoughts, and spirituality much the same way. Our bodies are different but not so incredibly different that we can't relate. In fact, they're more alike than they are different.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 12:49 AM
1

You're making a lot of assumptions here and the subtext is obviously a jab at women. The notion that you believe everything you said is fact, versus based on fact (similar to lifetime movies based on true stories), is just appalling. And your parroted scientific facts are out of context and don't coalesce into any conclusions that you made. Women ... are weak and defenseless You seem to believe that women carrying the weight of birthing is tantamount to being more cattle than human. That, simply…
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 12:47 AM
1

I sincerely hope you never become responsible for anyone in any capacity. You've single-handedly managed to remind me why I can't rely on men to be objective either. Your rationale is flawed and horribly narrow and shortsighted. You've managed to take very small amounts of data and extrapolated it into conclusions which are far removed from observable reality. In doing so, you basically called women mindless meat machines. I encourage anyone with a mind to stay considerably more objective than t…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 09:55 PM
-2

Don't worry about it, I wasn't expecting to educate the closed minded.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 09:11 PM
0

I'm not sure anyone is actually working on replacing men with women... That would be difficult at best. Also, we're not going to enter world war 3 over feminism. Sorry bud, I think your imagination is getting away from you.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 09:07 PM
-2

This is a non-issue. No one here suggested anything that you're arguing with.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/14 10:18 PM
-9

This is ill-informed at best. Equality is about individuals treating everyone equally, not treating everyone like you feel/perceive you and other's are treated.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/14 08:40 PM
-1

You don't have to agree. You can be wrong if you want (idgaf). No, I don't know much about his wife. But I do know that she's his wife and my experience with people in general is that relationships are a 2-way street. It takes 2 to tango, as they say. This type of guy didn't end up with a woman who was vastly different from him. That kinda thing just doesn't happen enough to consider plausible. Everyone hates being manipulated. The point is, he was being manipulated. He wouldn't act out this way…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 09:12 PM
0

Again, I don't agree with using manipulation consciously to "one-up" someone you're in a partnership with. Ignoring the fact that people do this is silly. You can tell me and the other people reading how shitty you think it is and I don't think anyone is necessarily going to disagree with you. The point isn't that it's morally correct to be manipulative. The point is it's a type of arms race. By ceasing to be manipulative in your relationships you open yourself up to exploitation. In a perfect w…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 01:55 AM
1

I agree, people who manipulate are shitty. However, everyone manipulates to some degree. Often a lot more than people acknowledge since there's a low level of manipulation which is socially acceptable. Particularly in women. I don't believe that you're necessarily more shitty the more you manipulate, it's not a 1:1 / linear progression. It is absolutely true that women are encouraged to use their sexuality to manipulate men, among other strategies for men and women alike, from a very young age. …
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 10:37 PM
2

Look, I don't necessarily agree with manipulation either. But the bottom line is women are trained from a very young age to use manipulation constantly and on men in particular. What's good about that? Why aren't you trolling women on that shit? And, furthermore, even if you don't believe women do it all the time you surely can't be confused that women do use it with men a lot. So why wouldn't it be acceptable for a guy to do it? Oh... right because it's feminine. How antiquated.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 06:23 PM
1

I'd like an example of the possible lie you have in mind. As others here have mentioned, if you're lying to boost yourself in her eyes, in any way, you're doing it wrong. I'm struggling to think of a lie you would feel compelled to use to sleep with a girl that wasn't predicated on "what I am/have/do/want isn't good enough." That, I think, is the bottom line: "What I want isn't good enough." If you have to lie to sleep with a woman, at all, you're probably doing it out of insecurity. Women, as a…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 07:49 PM
1

I wasn't confused about the comparison. I'm saying the comparison was a gross exaggeration. The principles of the KKK may be boiled down to white supremacy. But the KKK aren't simply protesting against people of color or campaigning for policy change. They've murdered thousands of people. Feminism has yet to murder one person. And it's unlikely that's ever gonna happen. The reason is the simple difference between feminism and the KKK and it's the same reason it's an unfair comparison: Feminism i…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 10:05 PM
1

That's not a fair comparison and you know it. Feminists didn't ritually burn or hang men for being men. Or anyone for any reason ever.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:48 PM
1

I'm not sure this is constructive or based on anything but your opinion. I don't know what "blatant acts of hostility and hatred towards feminist men" you're talking about. Traditionalism isn't a female supremacist hate movement. It's not even a formal movement that I know of. The pattern you're missing is ... "the people behind feminism" is a really absurd notion. Feminists are the people behind feminism. There isn't some wizard behind the curtains. I don't know how that's a pattern. And I don'…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:46 PM
1

You can have compassion for everyone. That doesn't mean you owe them anything or that you have to share anything of yours with them.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 07:10 PM
1

My point exactly. I can't tell if you're calling out my feminism or my mrm-ism but, either way, I get this kind of write off.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 05:44 AM
1

*Chalk it up to all caused by male action I'm not gonna argue this point to finely because I appreciate the spirit in which this comment was intended. But consider that men don't act without the women in their lives having had some sort of impact on them. i.e. Why did we go to war? Resources? Resources for... our wives? just saying...
/r/MensRights25/09/14 10:56 PM
13

I'm not even just talking about something like a false allegation. You ever had a woman come after your character? It's partly because she's a woman that it's so destructive (this is something I can concede might be helped by changing our views of women) but, regardless, they can be utterly brutal. Women don't fight or argue to wound. They do it to humiliate. You argue with a woman in a public/social setting... sheesh... I'd rather let her hit me.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 11:57 PM
42

I think this is my main take-away. Why aren't drunk obnoxious women seen as destructive as men? Is it because they cause less harm? I doubt it. Do they break everything in your living room? Maybe not. Do they make other people miserable? Absolutely. This is something I've been trying to pin down for a while: Why is the destruction that women cause; emotional, mental, psychic trauma, any less significant? I'd take a beating from any guy over the worst slanderizing and humiliation most women can d…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 09:59 PM
1

Not sure what you're referring to but I don't really care either. Most people are insecure and most people are predictable. You don't have to be a fortune teller or a psychic to understand human nature. You do, however, have to be pretty narrow-minded to feel threatened by the truth.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 04:59 AM
1

pfffft... and they said A-list was only for trolls.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 09:35 PM
5

oh shit lol (80%) does this mean we're dating already?
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 09:32 PM
3

I don't think that means what you think it means
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 08:20 PM
-1

I'll grant you a few things: Doing what makes you happy is smart Giving her an opportunity to make you happy is smart But I want to disabuse you of a few notions: You're not in an LTR - this may be my ego talking but 8 months is about how long it takes to start thinking about being in an LTR. You're just not that powerful. Your actions effect her, sure, but she's not a robot. Believing you're this all-powerful being which has complete mind control over another person is a sure fire way to find l…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 06:46 PM
1

Could be. Isn't necessarily. Likely isn't.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 04:39 AM
1

You don't need to say something explicitly for people to understand the intention. Whether conscious or not, some people absolutely talk about women as subhuman.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 04:29 AM
-1

I disagree, FRs can be useful but I think the majority of them are validation seeking. But I'm not actually talking about the FRs as much as the, "Look at this FB post some bitch I don't know made." Talking shit never made anyone a better person.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 06:32 PM
-1

Totally understand your point and, it goes without saying, the smart man takes what works and leave the rest. I get this isn't a support group but I still feel it's important to provide a little guidance here and there. There's a saying that goes something like, "If you don't like what's being said, say what you would want to hear." I can choose to neglect the community - be a passive observer and let the stream of consciousness continue in the same way - essentially being a consumer of shitty m…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 06:28 PM
2

This is not true at all. I'm not even sure where you got this idea from. It's self evident that experience is better than academic knowledge of a subject most of the time. But an intelligent person can learn from another person's mistakes and can take the advice of someone who failed and use that to a much more successful end on their own. This is one of the unique qualities of being human. We do not need to make our own mistakes all the time. More to the point, academic knowledge of a subject i…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 06:17 PM
1

We feel you, a lot of us have been through it. But, for real, you're pedestalizing hard here. Get some plates. 3, 4, 5- 10! doesn't matter just as long as you're getting some experience with new women, not putting all your energy into any woman, heck! you shouldn't be putting much energy into women at all. If you really feel like you need to get laid then get some plates. It's also totally ok to refocus on yourself and just be a man on your own till you clear your head. 10 days is less than 0 da…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:38 PM
1

I like your skepticism. I'm gonna go on a tiny tanget here: There was a moment in the Soprano's when Tony is in therapy and he's discussing similar issues. The therapist brought up the point that now the first world has, effectively, removed the struggle for basic human needs, we have more time to focus on our inner world. Now that we're free from the bondage of fighting for survival on a daily basis, we have the option and ability to start focusing our energy on the emotional landscape we all h…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:17 PM
1

I've never seen any evidence to suggest alpha women are likely to be "feminists and often lesbians." Moreover, you seem to be equating alpha women to alpha men, in the sense of leadership, which also seems like faulty logic. I think you need to substantiate these claims before using them to argue why women are being "led astray." Also, you've given the mechanism of "Why are women trying to be more like men?" but not the actual reasoning behind it. It's not simply a random occurence. I don't beli…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:08 PM
2

I agree with this but this begs the question: Why are women trying to be more like men?
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 10:06 PM
1

Also not "higher stages." Going sideways doesn't elevate you. That's like saying the grad students of pogo sticking came to the unicycle race for advice.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 10:01 PM
0

Doesn't make sense. If women aren't of interest then why come to a place where people are discussing women?
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 09:59 PM
0

Ya, but they try to recruit in the mid teens before physical maturation too.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 09:58 PM
-1

I don't think anyone in TRP came here simply because they were on a truth finding mission. Especially since most of these guys are late-teens/early-twenties. I'd wager all of them had their feelz hurt by a woman somehow and wanted to find a way to understand the incomprehensible logic behind that perceived injustice. I'm in the same boat and this was the conclusion I came to when I questioned my own motives. Thankfully I have a little more life experience to fall back on. It is surprising how st…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 05:26 PM
7

I've seen his sentiment a dozen times but, for one reason or another this hit me hard just now I'm chalking it up to a recent experience I had with a fucking 10 who asked me to help her carry her laundry downstairs - I pointed out that she wasn't carrying anything else and it was silly of me to be doing her a favor like that, in a casual and light-hearted way, not accusing her of anything. She instantly went from fun and giggly to HEATED and wouldn't let me touch the damn laundry basket. She sai…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 01:39 AM
-10

Ok, let's start at the top: Let's assume he never got aggressive with her or the child and that his entire family believes he did, despite knowing him his entire life. He says he HAS been paying child support every month. If he's supposed to pay 60% of his paycheck each month, and he's paying $500, then he's making ~$833 each month. In order to be behind $15,000 in child support he would need to have missed a total of (15000/500) 30 months. You've been together with him roughly 4 years. Of the 4…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:41 AM
3

It's only "irrelevant" if you're hamstering like a pro.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 10:36 PM
3

The OP's question was fallacious. Might as well ask someone why they're an idiot and expect them to support your side of the argument with an explanation. How about, instead of agreeing with the presuppositions, we take a look at the motivation behind the question. The answer, almost invariably, is that the OP is the idiot and is projecting their own flaws onto other people/groups. And now you're guilty by association.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 09:50 PM
3

Ok, that definitely doesn't mean what you think it means then.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 09:21 PM
5

Sorry, much like "sexism" is only applicable from men to women and women towards other women, "hamstering" is only applicable to women towards men and BP men towards other men. I'm not sure you understand the actual point of the thread. Because the actual point was to show that TRP philosophy is insular and doesn't lend itself to criticism. Truth is, even if that's accurate (which it isnt), it doesn't matter. The criticism is coming from a camp where the very foundations of the movement are cons…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 08:55 PM
0

Again, totally different argument, but, OK, let's go down this road: You may not mean to be asking about personal integrity but the integrity of a group is reliant upon each individual. So I don't really believe in hive-mind integrity. Do I think anyone should be able to say whatever they want regardless of what they mean? Sure, why not? Not that this has much to do with anything...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 07:07 AM
2

I apologize, let me clarify: Men as a class never knowingly and maliciously made a single move against women as a class.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 06:38 AM
-1

completely different argument but, ok, let's go there: would that give TRP a free pass to do the same Yes. Yes it does. All's fair. or would integrity demand that TRP should be willing to change their minds in reaction to evidence and demand that feminism does the same? Personal integrity would have to be a person to person choice. Much like average feminists, I choose not to associate myself with retards. So the "TRP" beliefs I ascribe to haven't been challenged, let alone overturned. There's n…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 06:28 AM
1

Ya, sorry, I only rise to the unknowingly ignorant comments edit: left a word out
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 05:20 AM
-2

Ohhhh snap. Ya, I forgot. My bad =x
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 04:42 AM
0

Hey, let's be really fair, your argument is retarded. Did your reason escape you or were you born that way? Women are the people reading these articles. And they're certainly not just in the Daily Mail. I'm not looking to those articles for relationship advice. We cited it as a low hanging example of exactly the kind of bullshit attitudes that show how women believe they're superior to men. So, Ya, I say, "fuck playing nice." Men as a class never made a single move against women as a class. This…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 04:40 AM
1

I'd like to see a feminists example of this too. Edit: Oh shit, did I imply feminism is fallible? My bad. Allow me to go kill myself before the broodlings discover my shame.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/14 04:13 AM
2

Link to what? You want me to link to an article that says, "The term 'stepfather' is often used synonymously with the term 'molester' in certain social circles?" Ok, well, let me google that for you: Abstract: “The prevalence and seriousness of incestuous abuse: stepfathers vs. biological fathers.” one out of approximately every six women who had a stepfather as a principal figure in her childhood years, was sexually abused by him. The comparable figures for biological fathers were 2% or one out…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 05:18 PM
0

in a single-parent household it's more common for kids to be abused by their mothers. Are you seriously using this as a counter argument? "In houses where only the mother is raising the child, the stepfather is less likely to abuse the child." And I love how you went on to prove my point, "The next most common abuser is the guys the mom is trying to make the stepfather." I'm sure you'll want to differentiate between transient flings and "step-father material" but don't bother. bluepill ... Know …
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 05:04 PM
21

Oh god how untrue this is... "stepfather" is practically a code word for "molester"
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 07:16 PM
1

That's exactly how English works. Someone makes up a word and defines it. If you want to use that word but give it a different definition you have to clearly define the term and the difference in how you use it. Otherwise, by default, the original meaning is the only correct one. No, I'm pretty sure that when you coin a term you get the authority to define it. Sure, maybe other people can take that word and give it additional definitions. But, unless those definitions are clearly indicated and y…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 12:40 AM
1

You can by way of defining the terms differently. It's a word for a concept. We get to make the rules. And feminists (probably) coined the term so they get to define it.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 07:22 AM
1

The concept of sexism towards men is controversial. As feminism defines it (or at least as the feminists here define it): Women can do something sexist but sexism is applied, generally, from men to women. That is to say, men cannot be victims of sexism only sexist acts. I had a hard time grasping this concept until I realized they were just making up their own definitions of things. And that's fine by me. I tend to agree with this definition, so long as feminists will concede that prejudicial ac…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 07:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter