TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Chuckeedee Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by Chuckeedee on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Is there some reason why you are unable to work through Crimson's answer yourself? When we comment here, we make basic assumptions about the levels of intelligence of the participants, and their ability to make inferences. If you need your hand held with every comment, perhaps you should find another hobby.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:03 AM
2

No. Some people might call your argument a strawman. I just call it failure in comprehension. My wording is precise and I mean what I write.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:52 AM
2

Actually, it's occurred to me that if the simple logic of my original post was lost on CanonMK then the subtlety of my last point will certainly overwhelm them. Here's what I'm getting at with my reference to the primary nurturer and "every male rapist is some primary nurturer's son." It's the idea that the primary nurturer and the choices she/he makes plays a fundamental role in how her/his child turns out. For example, refer Stephen Baskerville and how single parent households relate to crime …
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:30 AM
3

Given that the logic escapes you, you must be a feminist (rationality never was one of their strong points). The phenomenon of chicks digging jerks is routinely discussed on the internet... eg, Chateau Heartiste (google "chicks dig jerks"). Or is it my closing sentence that you disagree with? What part of "most every child has a primary nurturer" do you not understand?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:49 AM
-12

Many women like rapists (bad-boys)... or at least, the rapist in men. You will never eliminate rape so long as many women continue to exercise their preference for degenerates. Which would seem to suggest that women also have within them the capacity to stop rape. For the simple truth is that the type of man that a woman chooses is a vote in favour of the type of man she thinks all men should be. You cannot hold men (as an all-inclusive group) responsible for rape while many women continue to va…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:02 AM
-2

Because feminism is ridiculous, and you don't counter one absurdity with another. Feminidiocy has set the terms of the debate, so why emulate them with a "men are victims too?" Feminism should have been laughed into oblivion from its inception, but now that this lunatic phenomenon has a foothold, they think that they can laugh at us. There is nothing to learn from feminism but how NOT to be.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 11:43 PM
0

I wonder if there is some kind of connection between this story and male slave-providers being forced to do situps in New Delhi for boarding a women-only carriage. Hmmmm, yes I believe there might be: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/8165976/Men-caught-in-women-only-train-carriage-forced-to-do-sit-ups.html Those male scum really need to be taught a lesson, eh?
/r/MensRights29/12/12 01:24 PM
6

I for one am glad that society is being alerted to the stranger danger that lurks at every corner, nay, in the very air we breathe. For example, just the other day I saw one dude on his own waiting at a bus-stop, obviously with nefarious intent (he was wearing a black hoodie), and it is clear that when a bus stopped and he got on board, this was just a cover for his rapacious intent. The man at the bus-stop is described as being white, aged mid to late 20s, 6ft 1ins tall with a solid build and h…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 04:15 AM
9

Surely women, who have tended to opt for the role of primary nurturer for more than a few centuries, should have a say in the type of culture that their children grow up in and go to school in, shouldn't they? No, it wasn't a mistake to give women the vote. But it was definitely a serious mistake to allow feminist lobby groups to completely erode the US Constitution. Affirmative action, VAWA, rape shield laws, the DV industry and the like are fundamentally unconstitutional, and could never have …
/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:49 PM
0

In response to an objection to my above point: Semiotics is the study of how we attribute meanings to events (eg, semiotician CS Peirce). It is the study of the relationship between mind and culture. Meanings are often attributed [almost] in an instant, especially primal, impulsive ones. So it makes sense that a man's subconscious awareness that he has to dumb himself down in anticipation of relating to a woman can be done in a very narrow time-window. It is fundamental to the relationship betwe…
/r/MensRights19/09/12 04:01 AM
0

Why do some of us appear to be assuming that men's impairment in cognitive performance in the presence of a woman is about being overwhelmed somehow? Maybe it's the opposite. My posts on the original science-reddit thread are self-explanatory: Maybe all this has to do with a subconscious awareness on the part of men that they've got to dumb themselves down in order to relate to women. After all, in intelligence tests it was found that on average, men used 6.5 times as much grey matter as women, …
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:58 AM
48

"Women can do anything that the boys can do, and do it better, and do it in heels" -President Obama He forgot to add "... so long as they have affirmative action granting them unearned freebies, privileges and promotions at the expense of men."
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:45 AM
13

So, is this what Susan Faludi famously called the backlash? Is it immaturity, as my own book seems to suggest? Is it the Internet as an escape valve for decades of pent-up rebellion against political correctness? Or, is it just good, old-fashioned misogyny? Speaking for myself, none of the above. My own disgust is based in affirmative action tilting the playing-field in favor of women at the expense of men... except that instead of "tilting" the field, the situation has come to a point where wor…
/r/MensRights30/07/12 03:18 AM
1

As a general rule, I do not enter into discussions with anyone calling themselves a feminist. However, given that this is a mens rights forum, here is what I have to say: 1) I am not a masculist for the same reason that I detest feminists. I only need to encounter a rabid masculist to remind me what it is that I despise about feminists. I am also not an MRA, though given that men have legitimate issues that demand attention, I support them in principle. Once these problems have been addressed, I…
/r/MensRights29/07/12 03:58 PM
2

MaunaLoona is correct, but this is certainly not the whole picture. There are two other important aspects to contemporary "rape culture": 1) Terms have been redefined. Rape means something very different today to what it did before feminists constructed the notion of rape culture out of thin air. There is, of course, no excuse for anyone to rape, just as there is no excuse for anyone to pull your ponytail or shout obscenities at you. These days, rape has all the gravity of a bad-hair day. These …
/r/MensRights29/07/12 04:09 AM
4

Here's an interesting bit of news. Who would have known that a fourth man sacrificed his life to protect another? But because it was a dude whose life was saved, and not that of a woman, that doesn't count, I guess. "Air Force Staff Sergeant Jesse Childress saved the life of fellow airman beside him." Link: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57478292/at-aurora-massacre-many-victims-died-protecting-others/ Obviously there is little honor to be had in saving a utility device, like a toaster or …
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:43 PM
0

I think that James Taranto's remark is a very reasonable one. After all, it's the first question that occurred to me when I read of the 3 men sacrificing themselves. He's not saying that the three women weren't worthy of being saved. He's saying that he hopes they were worthy. Two people authentically in love is one thing. But a serial-monogamist (maybe, say, a skank who's retired from the cock-carousel) losing her provider is another thing altogether. It's like losing a utility device, like a r…
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:03 AM
4

I simply do not trust anything regurgitated from the Anglosphere any more. And we should all have good reason to: http://www.metanexus.net/around-web/sharp-rise-retractions-scientific-papers-red-flag Furthermore, we know that men have more grey matter (neurons) and women have more white matter (glia) - Haier et al. (2005) - where it was found in intelligence tests that on average, men used 6.5 times as much grey matter as women did, and that women used 9 times as much white matter as men did. So…
/r/MensRights22/07/12 03:08 PM
-1

I think that an eleventh should be added: "Rape no longer means what it did prior to feminism coming on the scene 50 years ago. There is, of course, no excuse for anyone to rape, just as there is no excuse for anyone to pull your ponytail or shout obscenities at you. These days, rape has all the gravity of a bad-hair day. If you are a slut who threw away her honor years ago and you really did experience rape in any of its forms, like date-rape, or changed-my-mind rape, or take-back-the-night rap…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 10:39 PM
1

The key points in Goldwag's response that jump out at me: 1) VAWA, not to mention other blatantly sexist legislative initiatives such as affirmative action, constitutes a declaration of war against a nation's men. You don't have to agree with Thomas Ball to realize that a call to arms is not entirely unreasonable. The US Constitution has always factored in the right to rebellion against tyrants. This war against men had been declared long before Ball self-imolated and made his call to arms; 2) W…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter