TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ChunkyLaFunga Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by ChunkyLaFunga on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

This is an useless shitpost that has nothing to do with anything, especially you. Don't fall into the same trap that fuels hate groups.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 11:29 PM
-13

By being in an incel subreddit. Edit: Face the facts.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/21 06:48 PM
0

Well, yes.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/21 12:19 PM
1

Come on, you know what this sub is really about.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/21 08:20 PM
1

You are definitely in the wrong subreddit.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/20 08:14 AM
1

Neither did I at the time, just wondered who that ridiculously attractive woman was and thank you IMDB.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/20 06:36 PM
1

Huh? I'm all for personal taste but have you not seen Zombieland? Or any other thing with Amber Heard in?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/20 04:34 PM
14

My new excuse for the phone.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/11/19 09:51 PM
66

Does she think he should die at a certain age? Or what? If you killed all men, isn't that a bit... self-defeating for the future of women? I suppose she's probably just lashing out as a result of male-induced emotional trauma from her past, but the fact she's giving talks suggests there is some kind of structure to the vitriol.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 01:07 PM
2

Never come across that one...
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 08:05 PM
17

If you've never noticed how often white people mention that somebody is black for absolutely no reason, look out for it because it's everywhere. Even something as trivial as "This black guy asked me what the time was" instead of just "This guy asked me what the time was.". I'm not particularly confident in giving her the benefit of the doubt, but it clearly is often not malicious. It's like the most low-key possible segregation. No point in highlighting that their skin colour is different, but t…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/18 05:18 PM
6

Actually, since subreddit data is publicly available, it's possible to see the cross-over in activity. MensRights is the most popular non-political subreddit for those active in The_Donald. https://trevor.shinyapps.io/subalgebra/
/r/MensRights13/08/17 09:21 AM
8

Critique everything as if you oppose it, as they say. The obvious downside being that if you are leagues ahead of most people, you won't much enjoy the leagues behind discourse and eventually you'll probably stop taking part entirely. And everything just becomes that much more self-reinforcing. The ages-old 100k subreddit problem.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 07:50 PM
1

It is. But it may lead to a breach of the peace, which is not.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 04:34 PM
-2

Any examples? I ran through a few pages of your history and it was more or less upvotes all the way in 2XC, except for the one about the hot Catwoman. I agree with your observation (I don't visit /r/feminism, don't know the score there) and appear to broadly share your mindset too. When there was a "show yourselves" thread a while back, I was surprised to see how young they are. I wasn't really paying attention but nobody looked older than late 20's. Having said that, while 2XC is often a naíve …
/r/MensRights25/07/12 10:19 AM
-3

The two are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 08:04 PM
1

In terms of realism, that's only one notch above "this can be solved by not having sex except when trying for pregnancy".
/r/MensRights04/06/12 07:52 AM
1

Doesn't that suffer from the same problems that cause this situation in the first place? It enables the man to opt out on their word alone, because there's unlikely to be evidence for any of that. I'd rather things be equally fair than equally unfair.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 02:09 PM
2

I have possibly never been so appreciative of somebody taking the time to respond this way, thank you. The mention of the wording on weight does look like you're protesting the woman being called fat. All I said was "interesting wording". It was deliberately neutral because I didn't want to taint discussion in one particular direction from the outset and because I had several thoughts on the matter. Obviously a naíve tactic, but I tried. If she was fat, that's a detail. The writer tried to be PC…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 10:45 AM
2

http://www.pronetadvertising.com/articles/please-dont-linkjack.html
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:15 PM
5

And just when life couldn't get any worse, someone rips his article for personal gain.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:11 PM
3

Thank you for clarifying, I was unaware of the New Zealand terms for this crimes and missed the association when reading the text. Please see my comment here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u9y79/judge_treats_female_rapist_with_leniency/c4tm29q However, I will not respond to reductionism or other cognitive fallacies, or ad-hominem or other logical fallacies. Or excessive rudeness.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:51 AM
2

It's rape, you fucking moron. I did not dispute that, my comment clearly refers to the criminal charge and not the act itself. And as was explained elsewhere in the comments, the charge was not rape, it was sexual assault of an under-aged person; also known as statutory rape.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:47 AM
1

This is the sort of thing that's controversial for being controversial, in the sense of famous for being famous.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 11:18 AM
-3

I can't be bothered to address this. Have you ever, in your entire life, been persuaded by verbal abuse? What was the point of those dumb-or-playing-dumb quips, other than to comfort yourself with petty victory? Is that how a person effectively debates, convinces the other side of their argument, wins the day? Read your post back, is that how you'd like somebody new to the Men's Rights Movement to be introduced to your philosophy? No, it isn't. You are ruinous for your cause.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 09:36 AM
3

Well yeah, self-defense relies on advantage. And my reaction would certainly be different depending on gender, purely because of social conditioning. "Courtesy to not hit" would be an exaggeration, but there is an element of proportionality to responsive violence and I would bear that in mind. On the rare occasions I've had the opportunity to personally experience it, I've found a very clear difference in strength between sexes. I don't think you can ignore that whatever the circumstance of phys…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 09:08 AM
41

Morally, physical violence is equally abhorrent. Practically, women are probably going to come off worse. Citizen 101: Don't push cops. Cop 101: Don't punch people in the face.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:49 AM
2

The heavy-set woman was charged with sexual connection with a young person, a charge carrying a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. Interesting wording. Anyway, the page linked to says: Why such leniency? Which is exactly the problem, the article doesn't say. Obviously the reversal of gender is a factor, but it states: Judge Connell said she was lucky the charge laid was not more serious. Since the word "rape" isn't used anywhere, the above implies to me that she wasn't charged with it. But t…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:00 AM
2

I think David McCandless doesn't know what matriarchy or patriarchy means. Otherwise, it might be interesting if someone took a deeper look the reasons for particular leaning.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 03:53 PM
-3

They're Feminists, dude, not the Borg. Any philosophical demographic is nothing more than an aggregate of very broadly compliant opinion. Who speaks for Feminism as a whole? Nobody. Some think they do, but nobody does.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 01:51 PM
-9

Does me visiting a strip club somehow increase the level of 'sexual assault'? So what you're saying is, sexual assault should be addressed on an individual basis, rather than profiling? Honestly, how the hell can you say that we should be 'working with' feminists after ridiculous proposals like this one? So what you're saying is, feminism should be addressed by profiling, rather than on an individual basis?
/r/MensRights28/05/12 11:52 AM
6

Because it perpetuates the notion that men are too stupid to perform basic tasks in rearing a child, and that it's acceptable to assume so. Please Explain Like I'm Stupid in what ways cultural reference is differentiated from cultural perpetuation before the ultimate outcome is known, and how you are able to make the distinction in this case specifically. Edit: Or downvote and move on. It's all good.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 08:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter