TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Chyrch Archive

View 0 posts and 117 comments by Chyrch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Personally I don't give anyone I don't know the benefit of the doubt. She doesn't have to tell me what happened to her, but I'm not going to believe something happened until I know more about a situation. I have no doubt that sexual assault can happen with clothes on, in a crowded bar. But unfortunately the term "sexual assault" is such a friggin broad term that it can mean a lot of different things. If the guy stuck his hand up her shirt and fondled her breasts, I'll be the first one on the pho…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 01:24 AM
-12

I hate to burst everyone's bubble, but athlete culture or not, slapping someone's ass is not at all appropriate in a courtroom. While I agree that it looks harmless, an unwelcomed slap on the ass is indeed sexual harassment. If the lawyer was female, no one would laugh, and it wouldn't even be second-guessed that this guy deserved what he got. This subreddit often proclaims that genders shouldn't matter, and that assault is assault. To see people dismissing this as though it were the judge that …
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:26 AM
1

has made life for the victims parents hell How?
/r/MensRights26/05/13 07:40 PM
2

I don't think that Ms. Hunt should go to jail on this necessarily, or be labelled for the remainder of her life. I do think there should be some lighter legal consequences, and society should hold this line firmly. I agree with this completely. She's having her life ruined over something that occurs very frequently, and doesn't do as much harm as many people like to claim. It's like these laws are being kept by people who can't get over the embarrassment of the stupid shit they did when in schoo…
/r/MensRights26/05/13 07:38 PM
2

That's quite a simplification
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:43 PM
1

I just read through all the comments. There were definitely a couple bad ones from feminists, but I found more comments bashing feminism.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 11:24 PM
12

Kudos to the Men and Women who wrote in their complaints about the article.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 03:38 PM
-1

Men CAN have "Men's only" spaces. There just aren't any because it wouldn't be good for business.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 02:22 PM
2

He makes fun of Democrats a lot as well. He's clearly liberal, but he's far from one-sided.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:11 AM
3

It should be noted that the women really said: "Why are you obsessed with fraudulent rape claims? Why aren't you obsessed with real rape claims, the people that are actually being victimized?" This was the dumbest thing I heard in the entire video. To suggest that someone accused of rape fraudulently isn't a victim has got to be one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:49 PM
-1

He's said a lot of dumb shit over the years, including stuff about 9/11 being an inside job, and other Alex Jones territory bullshit. But as with most opinionated people, others will only focus on the things they agree with, and because he's a semi-celebrity, he tones down his opinions he knows are unpopular to his fanbase. He gets attention and a following because of his vocal opinions on matters like the one in this thread. But really, it's an extremely popular opinion. People (especially when…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:01 PM
2

From one of the comments: You thought you had a PR nightmare before? This shit just hit Tumblr. Oh no .....
/r/MensRights21/03/13 08:58 PM
1

Gems like: "Straight white male: Life on easy mode" This really is one of the most offensive things you can say to anyone, that they have it easy because of being a straight white male. Not only is it disturbing that they'll form an opinion like this without knowing anything about what you've gone through, it devalues any accomplishments, and makes failures even worse.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 08:52 PM
3

There's already a couple threads about how stupid this video is. They have some pretty good information.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 12:17 PM
2

the very white straight cis able bodied western dude nature of the site An interesting way to describe Wikipedia
/r/MensRights15/03/13 12:07 PM
2

So make an identical picture but with Women instead of Men. Record the results.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 11:52 AM
23

I once saw an episode where she didn't let the defendant speak once. As in, never even addressed. She ruled in favour of the Plaintiff despite their not being near enough hard evidence to do so, and should have been mediating between both parties to come to a proper judgement. That made me instantly dislike her, which wasn't a big loss considering it's only daytime television. But I've come to the conclusion that the defendant likely did speak, but it was edited extremely poorly. She's been pret…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 11:44 AM
8

I still don't see how the "Damsel in Distress" scenario that many games used are in any way subjugating women. As part of evolution, it's a basic premise that the female (the one who can bear children), is more valuable than the male. Many people may not think about it, but it's certainly an influence. Consider how many games there are that use a "Damsel in Distress" as a plot mechanic. Mario will risk his life for Peach. Link will risk his life for Zelda. That's simply accepted as how it is, un…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 11:33 AM
19

That was awesome. The last half, especially. My favourite part of this video though? It was well done, and yet didn't cost thousands of dollars to make.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 11:04 AM
4

Well each place will likely be different, but speaking as someone who up until recently had long hair, I was charged the amount for a Woman's cut. Other places may only charge for a Man's cut because their signage pretty much forces them to.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:46 AM
1

Wow. That's so depressing to see in a University setting. The disrespect that the feminists showed towards their guest speaker was disgusting. That guy at the end of the clip you linked was particularly annoying. He criticizes her argument by telling her how she should argue? She's the professional there. Then he takes issue with her comment about feminism being mainly motivated by the concept of society being a patriarchy, and gets upset that she doesn't address all the different forms of femin…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:47 AM
5

Insurance here in Ontario is a fucking joke for young drivers. It never should have been privatized. But whatever. People are idiots. Brampton is also one of the top cities in the Country for insurance claims (I wonder why), so that doesn't really help.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 07:40 PM
56

That's pretty awesome. This is one of the issues that made me start thinking about how shitty Men have it in some areas. When I was 19 or so, I got my first vehicle. It was a fucking minivan, but whatever. I felt the pressure to get a vehicle since everyone around me made it seem like only losers don't drive. You know, the same pressure also applied to living at home. So there I was, at 19, living on my own in Brampton Ontario (bleh), excited to get my first vehicle. So I called up the insurance…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:50 PM
1

Bystander Effect
/r/MensRights13/03/13 12:58 PM
1

It's not even close to being "every time". And so what? For the first 40 years of gaming, the target demographic was male. Of course they'd have you play a male lead. It helps with immersion. These days though, we see a LOT more options to play a female lead, and rarely is the "damsel in distress" scenario even used.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:22 PM
5

Call of Duty: Black Ops Madden NFL ‘12 Halo 4 Assassin’s Creed 3 Just Dance 4 NBA 2K13 Borderlands 2 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Lego Batman 2: DC Super Heroes FIFA ‘12 These were the best-selling games from the last year. Not one of them focused on a damsel in distress. So of course she's biased. She's put herself out there, standing up for a subject she feels passionate about. Now, her ego is at stake. She'll reach for every little bit of information she can in hopes of selling her point.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 07:56 AM
3

Yeah, I couldn't read that thread for very long. It was far too depressing to see a conversation about complex social issues be so obviously skewed by massive downvotes on any opition that was even remotely critical.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 07:19 AM
9

Mario merely fulfills his gender role as the selfless rescuer That's what most games are about. The fantasy was never about saving a woman. It was about being a hero by risking your life to stop the evils that threaten your home.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 07:15 AM
3

While I agree that socially awkward men are more likely to set off red flags, there are also many people who are so paranoid that they really do assume that every male will abuse their child if given the chance.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:13 AM
7

I'd be very interested in hearing the other sides to this story. Everything seems to be a bit exaggerated, which makes me think that he's not being completely honest. Unfortunately, that now makes me doubt the important part of his story, which is whether or not he was acting inappropriately. So while I'd like to sympathize, and I agree that it's possible that this Woman could just be fucking him over for some reason, I also think it's just as likely that he really did harass her (possibly even …
/r/MensRights21/02/13 10:43 PM
9

Wow. Normally these posts about about little jokes like this are petty and self-defeating. But joking about shooting any men that the woman can't change? That's pretty fucked up. And yeah, I can't see many people finding it funny if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 12:01 AM
16

That's incredibly sad. You could just get to know a Woman before you live together or get married. If she's a reasonable person, she'll very likely stay a reasonable person. If she's unreasonable, then simply break up with her, as there's not good future there.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:11 AM
57

I kinda doubt it. I'd actually be really surprised if the police didn't go after the Woman after that. Maybe they wouldn't consider it full blown assault, but I don't think they'd turn a blind eye either. Most likely, they never even heard about it. Which is a shame, since the first thing the cashier should have done was record that Woman's license plate number and call the police.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:55 PM
10

In Canada, I'd expect the same. Adults should know how to respond to assholes, and that response should never be assault. The guy was acting like an asshole, sure. So what? The most he deserved was to be called an asshole and then ignored. He does not deserve to be assaulted whatsoever.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:52 PM
5

We're typically a very reasonable people. The passive culture tends to lend itself to less confrontational discourse. However, we still have immensely stupid, self-absorbed fuckwits.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:16 AM
13

The only people who will buy her a coffee these days are guys who are trying to show how "enlightened" they are. Let's face it though. She should never have been a speaker at any conference. She's a blogger. The only reason she was asked to speak was because of the pressure to include more women speakers. I guess the women who are actually qualified to speak at such conferences were busy doing actual work, so they resorted to simple bloggers in an effort to shut the whiners up. I swear, for a gr…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:11 AM
4

Women are much less likely to ask for raises, or to be assertive in their demands at all. I'll have to be a jerk though as well. I'm much too tired to find a source.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:58 AM
1

Perhaps, as well as a lesson on not putting words in the mouths of others.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:57 AM
1

Toronto, Ontario. $500 will only get you a room to rent, which is usually really shitty. A two bedroom apartment is about 1000. A one bedroom will cost about 750-800. When I was 20, I bought a minivan to use for work. My insurance (I wish I was kidding about this) was 900 a month. I had no tickets or anything on my record at that point. It was simply a really terrible area for driving, and thus insurance was sky-high. I went through as much driving school as I could to lower my rates, but it was…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:26 AM
2

Words and ideas have implications No shit. As long as there are words, there will be asshats who jump to conclusions and stick to their original interpretation despite further elaboration. If you think someone is implying something, but not explicitly saying it, try asking for elaboration before simply accusing them of hate-speech. Even now, look at your own words: I clearly picked up on what you were implying I wasn't implying anything of the sort that you and Emperor_NOPEolean are suggesting. …
/r/MensRights17/01/13 02:58 AM
-1

Are you serious? You can't back up your assertion, so you resort to simply saying "well you obviously mean what I said you mean"? That is an incredible disservice to honest discussion. You say that I'm the reason the MRA is seen negatively, and then pull shit like this? Just shameful.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 11:54 PM
4

So you're just going to skirt away my question then? I ask again, where, specifically, did I say that Women don't work as hard as Men? If you're misinterpreting what I wrote, perhaps you should reread it. Otherwise, I expect you to be held accountable for your comments. Also, your accusation of hate speech is completely absurd. In no way was my comment hateful towards Women. It pointed out what I feel as major flaws in society regarding the expectations of Men versus the expectations of Women in…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 11:34 PM
1

but my parents raised all of their children to work their asses off and be successful. Good for them. Now where did I say that Women don't work as hard as Men?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 10:58 PM
2

Did I say anything about not making any income? It's very possible to have a full-time job and yet have no money. Where I live, the current minimum wage is 10.25 an hour. Pretty much every entry level job starts off like this. So 40 hours a week is 410 dollars, which ends up being 1777 dollars a month. That 1777 is not going to come close to paying for housing, a vehicle (plus insurance and gas), and basic necessities such as food and clothing. However, it's much more common and socially accepta…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 10:55 PM
4

Not surprising in the least. Young Women (late teens, early 20's) have it so ridiculously easy. It's easier for them to find good work. They're not expected to pay for anything. There's not NEARLY as much pressure to be independent. If they don't drive or have any money, it's no big deal. But if a young Man doesn't drive or have any money, he's a loser. It's such a twisted situation.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:09 PM
0

It's true, despite what others may think. She really wasn't much of a threat to him, so escalating the situation is unnecessary, and may end up getting him in trouble. However, there are places where you can shoot somebody for not getting of your lawn. So I guess it depends on your location.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:02 PM
3

Or she's just a psycho hosebeast. Not every crazy Woman is a feminist.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:58 PM
5

Yeah. I watched this yesterday and noticed the same thing. It was handled relatively okay. I didn't see any gender bias. The only thing that I found stupid was when the worker had her off the guy, why the fuck did he let her go? He should have restrained her until the cops arrived.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:56 PM
1

Obviously I'm very late to respond, but I congratulate and appreciate your reasonableness. Your other comment here made a good summary of your feelings about feminism, so I really don't have a lot to ask. The only thing I would like elaboration on is your description of "traditional". First, how do you define traditional? And second, do you think "tradition" plays a large role in this debate (i.e. Can "modern" Women recognize the imbalance feminism has created?) I must also point out, that while…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:40 AM
28

While there are plenty of examples of "feminists" stifling the speech of those who disagree with them, I refuse to believe that there aren't many (the majority probably) who are indeed open to frank and earnest discussions.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 06:28 AM
2

Coercion in the common usage means to persuade No. Persuade means persuade. Coercion means coercion. Just because feminists have been twisting words to suit their whims, doesn't mean they get to change the definition.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:15 AM
2

This is exactly it. She now can use the "I know what I'm talking about. I was raped myself" card. It means practically zilch in the real world, but it means a shit ton for her ego.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:58 AM
3

All of that I agree with, and have even said myself. I take issue though with simplistic answers that provide no actual insight, and make Women out to be the enemy.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:45 AM
0

Coerced sex? Seriously? Did they seriously ask if there was coercion involved, or is this just another exaggeration of persuasion? One is obviously not okay, but there's nothing wrong with trying to persuade someone to do something
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:30 PM
0

Yeah, I've seen posts like that, and they're pretty idiotic. Social issues are something to talk about, and it's a pain in the ass when some important issues aren't being taken seriously. But to suggest that Women are maliciously trying to control Men in the way some comments here suggest, is simply absurd.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:25 PM
60

This really is the issue. Women have been told for 40+ years to embrace their sexuality. During the same period, Men have been shown that instances where a man displays his sexuality, it's either creepy, funny, or simply violent. I went to an event called "The everything to do with sex" show. I was kind of dragged there, as I thought it would be boring. Three things really struck me while I was there: It was a pretty even 50/50 split of Men and Women During the little "shows" the Woman were WAY …
/r/MensRights01/01/13 06:54 AM
2

I get what you're trying to say. It's very much in line with the "disposable male" theory. However, you could've picked a better way to say it.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 03:01 AM
3

Well, that's a huge part of the reason why there are more Men than Women in the protective services professions. It should also be noted that Men are assumed to be a protector, as if it's part of their genetic role. So many young men are inclined to live up to that protector role, and thus are more likely to join the army/police/fire fighters/etc.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:58 AM
6

Gotta love it. People love seeing trained security after events like a shooting. Then a month will go by, and people will come to their senses that it was an anomaly, and then will start to bitch about there being security. No wonder governments wait until national tragedies to pass controversial laws
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:53 AM
1

Thanks for not ruining it. I'll likely see for myself in a couple weeks or months.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:15 AM
2

Kinda hard to say. I mean, people can take hallucinogens and have consensual sex. It depends on the people, the place, all that. So like I said, it's hard to say. He's also wearing jeans, and didn't make and motion of zipping up his pants. So perhaps she was just gyrating on top of him? (which is still weird, but whatever) I still think it's kind of ridiculous though, that women can be slightly tipsy and use that as an excuse to cry rape even when everything was consensual. But men can be drunk …
/r/MensRights26/12/12 08:29 PM
5

"What's in this drink" is pretty clear about date rape drugs No it's not. How prevalent do you think date rape drugs were back in the 40's? consenting after being badgered doesn't make everything okay, that's called coercion. No, it's REALLY not
/r/MensRights26/12/12 05:40 AM
3

Men are also far more likely to be the ones driving when an accident occurs, because for some reason, Men are simply expected to drive while Women are in the passenger seat. So of course insurance companies are going to have statistics that show Men as being in more accidents. So unless there's a massive cultural shift where Women drive just as often as Men, I don't see why Men should be punished even more for chauffeuring Women around.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:26 PM
6

That's exactly what I was thinking. An elementary school especially.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 07:52 PM
1

I think he was being sarcastic
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:55 PM
–

Most /r/JusticePorn videos from youtube get flagged within a few hours. This has been going on for several weeks. It's not limited to videos showing Women getting hurt.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:32 PM
5

She had a traumatic time as a teenager. Yeah, that sucks. So do many others. But she's 36 now. She should have dealt with her issues long ago. By not doing so, she's now responsible for killing someone. So I really don't agree that she doesn't deserve at least a couple years in jail. We can't encourage a society where we can blame others for our actions.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:55 PM
1

If it was a man with the hammer, no doubt people would intervene Do you seriously think anyone would try to stop a man with a hammer to protect an inanimate object?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:04 AM
4

If it makes you feel any better, neither of you came off that open-minded or intelligent, in my opinion. I mean, why did you focus on his assertion that's it's not a black and white issue? In fact, how can you possibly think that ANY social issue is black and white? He, of course, was wrong to assert that your opinions are nothing more than "misogynist bullshit".
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:54 AM
1

You're reaching for something that isn't there. You can say whatever you want. If you're going to nitpick over a common phrase I used, just say as much at the beginning, so we're not wasting each other's time.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:19 AM
1

That is unless of course you don't think people have a right not to be detained against their will and tortured Ah I see. We don't agree with you, so therefore we must believe that people should be tortured. That's some solid reasoning there.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:04 AM
1

No reasonable person would argue that using violence to keep from being wounded via burning (or other similar means) is wrong. I'm not arguing that at all. I would argue though, that fantasizing (which, by most definitions is something we derive pleasure from), about being put into a situation where you're forced to resort to violence is disturbing. Mostly though, I'd argue that it's actually very reasonable, on a subreddit about Men's Rights, where we're often caricatured as misogynists, to per…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:32 AM
0

You are wrong and you are promoting the gender stereotype that men are all violent creatures He has a difference of opinion, and isn't wrong just because you say so. You wrote 3 paragraphs about his 1 sentence, and clearly making assumptions about his position. How about you try to get him to clarify his opinion more through dialogue rather then jump to conclusions and declare him wrong?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:01 AM
4

I fantasize about unruly females putting me in a position where I can justifiably unload on them Well that's disturbing. Seriously, saying you fantasize about "unloading" on unruly Women not only has no place here, but it's a hindrance to the entire point of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:19 AM
3

I don't really see this as a Men's Rights issue. It's simply 3 crazy people torturing someone. There are cases of 3 Men doing horrible things to a Woman as well, so I'm not sure what the relevance is to this subreddit. If it's just to demonstrate that Women are capable of heinous acts, I still don't see the point. Very few, other than batshit fanatics, would argue that there aren't crazy Women out there.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:15 AM
2

It should be noted that this phenomenon isn't isolated to feminism. It's like this for many political activism movements. They start with some intelligent people gathering a following. But quickly the voices of the intelligent, rational people get drowned out by the louder, less intelligent, but self-righteous voices. These are the voices that provide the assurance to the rest of the group that they're "fighting for a just cause". They're full of quick slogans and black and white rhetoric, since…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:55 AM
6

It's not authoritarianism. They could've simply stood by the building with signs and yelling their stupid chants. But they didn't. They decided to break the law by forming a barrier, preventing people into the meeting. They got right in people's faces, which could very well be considered harassment. This is not equivalent to students having a sit-down protest on a walkway.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:54 AM
7

Political correctness and politeness is too prevalent here in Canada. People won't call out others for their inane ramblings out of fear of being considered rude, especially when it comes to girls. So girls are often treated like angels and rarely ever talked back to. It's created a situation where girls in their late teens/early twenties think they can get away with some incredibly rude behaviour. At a concert last summer, where douchebaggery is to be expected, the only problem we had was with …
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:11 AM
–

Looks like it's real. I don't understand how someone can have that mentality, but whatever. It's also disturbing the media's reaction to all of these. To find out more info, I googled ""Cameo Patch" and most of the links were about "hot teachers". She's a fucking sexual predator and they call her "hot"?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:39 PM
2

Is their pizza actually any good? It's not just cardboard with a bit of cheese is it?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:01 AM
2

why are all of these women so fucking beautiful? Think about the type of girl that gets pushed into dance. More specifically, think about the type of Mother that pushes her daughter into dance.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:22 AM
4

(My female friend, 18F, was in the room, and was like 'that's not really rape', at which point I shot her a glare and said 'yes it is.') I believe she means that her friend was in the room when the conversation about it was going on. Not that she was in the room when the rape was going on.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:45 AM
6

Yeah I completely agree. It's like this for every social "war" though. The "war on women". The "war on men". The "war on christmas". Nobody is actually waging war here. It's only sensationalizing matters, and hurts the actual cause.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 11:30 PM
3

One in Georgia, where an 11 y.o. girl accused 3 boys of raping her (similar age, I believe) The girl was 11. The three boys were 9, 9, and 8. That was an even more interesting case than the first one linked. Reasons: Apparently there was another girl playing with the group during this time the act supposedly happened. No articles, statements given by the police or statement’s made by the girl address where this other girl went or why she is not charged with rape and kidnapping too and the girl o…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:27 AM
6

I understand that philosophy, but I gotta admit, I'm so glad I live in Canada, where it's illegal for a business to discriminate.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 07:47 AM
3

Even the healthier eating. Try going out with a group of people and order a salad. See the reaction you get. Of course Men are going to eat less healthy than Women when they're conditioned right from the beginning to like red meat and hate salad.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:58 AM
5

It's pretty disappointing that in a subreddit that fights misandry while claiming that misogyny is quickly vanishing, you get upvotes for saying "Justin Beiber is a girl".
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:59 AM
1

Skyfall was FAR from showing any misogyny. Anytime Bond was with a Woman it was in a consenting, playful way on both sides. If anything, it was a good example of a healthy attitude towards sex. It's fun and jolly, as long as both parties are respectful and safe. Also, the movie was almost entirely about Bond's adoration and respect for M. How the hell can it being misogynistic?
/r/MensRights17/11/12 05:37 AM
1

I just wish they allowed them more often for men too I don't know what's with this subreddit and going on about gyms lately, but whatever. In most places, Male only gyms are perfectly legal, just like Female only gyms are. They're membership based, and considered clubs, which play by different laws. So you can very well open up a Male only gym. Just prepare to lose a lot of money on it, as the demand is extremely low.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 05:15 AM
1

Curves isn't a store. It's a club that offers memberships. And yes, Men are allowed to have them. They just aren't popular, so there's not nearly as many. Edit: I should add that I'm actually quite torn on this issue. I heard about it last night, and I had some time to think it over. The business itself should be in trouble for denying her a haircut, as businesses like this can not discriminate in Canada. The barber himself can't be forced by his employer (He's co-owner, but still) to do somethi…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:55 AM
2

It's a tough one. I can't really recall an instance where adults hired male strippers to give lap dances to 16 year old girls, so I can't say what would have happened in that situation. It certainly is fucked up though. I'm sure they'll soon find out who actually hired the strippers, and will be pretty harsh. I'm not sure how I feel about the necessity to charge the strippers though. They could have feared being fired for all I know. The company should certainly be investigated.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:45 AM
2

Women's gyms require membership, thus are considered to be private clubs.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:03 PM
3

Women only gyms are often considered private clubs. Memberships are required, so different laws come into play. It should be noted here that Men only gyms also exist, but they're not nearly as big, because frankly they don't perform as well business wise.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:02 PM
3

Curves is considered a "club" yes. It requires a membership. When a membership is involved, then there are other laws that come into play.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:59 PM
0

It's sort of the same thing. Businesses can apply to be exclusive, but it's within reason, and is usually a hassle. The likelihood of a barbershop applying for this is incredibly slim.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:46 PM
17

I am choosing a book for reading
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:38 AM
2

Are you Canadian?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:32 AM
5

false equivalency
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:30 AM
9

Are you looking at this through American laws? Because the laws are different up here. Businesses here can't discriminate. It's illegal for them to do so. If I open a store, then I accept the social contract that states that I have to let everyone in. It's private property, but available to the public. If it's available to the public, then that means everyone. I'd be able to ban people from the store if I wished, but I'd have to have at least some decent reason. Canada's laws are geared more tow…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:29 AM
41

Exactly. What she's doing is assault, and everyone around was letting it happen instead of restraining her and handing her over to the police. Pathetic
/r/MensRights10/11/12 05:59 PM
15

I look at the lake
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:20 PM
3

What the fuck? This is why I don't socialize with stupid people. They do the weirdest things when they're drunk.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 01:42 AM
1

They "deserve" a good upbringing. Two-parent families don't have the monopoly on that.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 01:53 PM
5

That's exactly what I was thinking. Hitting someone over the head 30 times and then cutting his throat isn't a quick, reactionary thing. That's a few minutes of going batshit crazy.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:15 PM
5

It would be evidence sure, but of the wrong things. The Mother and Father can sign away legal and financial obligations to each other, but neither can sign away obligations to the child.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 12:41 PM
9

I will agree that there are more shitty single parents than good ones. But it shouldn't be ignored that there are many single parents who do an amazing job. I'm not sure if we should punish those people for the acts of others.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 12:35 PM
12

Exactly. You can't ever expect a politician to alienate people by dismissing the things they think are true. It's very possible that both candidates heard the "wage gap" brought up, and thought "Ugh, this bullshit still? Should I correct them? Naw, not worth it".
/r/MensRights17/10/12 03:57 AM
1

I saw that, and completely dismissed it. Is it a negative thing? Sure. But how about we do another study just like it, but instead of jobs in a scientific field, we do entry-level office jobs. I won't feel sympathy until there's at least fairness in the cushy, easy jobs that go to mainly woman and the back breaking warehouse work that mainly go to men
/r/MensRights12/10/12 05:21 AM
7

Interpretation Circumcision of HIV-infected men did not reduce HIV transmission to female partners over 24 months; longer-term effects could not be assessed. Condom use after male circumcision is essential for HIV prevention Where is the part that says "Male Circumcision increases risk of HIV transmission to female partners"?
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:14 AM
6

I'm pretty sure you don't actually mean that literally
/r/MensRights15/09/12 12:43 AM
2

Gowans, now 42, a popular teacher at Joseph Howe until her resignation after she was charged, has pleaded not guilty to sexual assault, sexual exploitation and sexual interference. It bothers me that any teacher has to resign simply because of allegations of misconduct, so I certainly can't condone this. But it's good to see that Female teachers share these experiences, instead of just focusing on Male teachers. It's also encouraging to see from the poll that the public recognizes that Female se…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:26 AM
4

Yeah actually she probably would.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 06:36 AM
10

These people were arrested right?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 01:29 PM
–

I'd be interested to see how the official reactions would be if the roles were reversed. I'm not suggesting you actually slash her tires, or involve the police. But would you be able to have a female friend call a magistrate and inquire about a criminal complaint? Then, if they are actually able to do anything, try to get the media involved.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 05:23 AM
-1

As a Canadian, I implore you Americans to do what you can to make sure your Republicans are out of power wherever possible. Nearly all of your politicians are dumb as bricks, but if you guys ever want to join the rest of modern society, please don't let the Republicans gain any more power.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:08 AM
1

It should be noted that the AAP's findings have no say on the morality of the issue. They're purely scientific in saying the benefits outweigh the risks, and are far from actually advocating the procedure. They clearly say the choice isn't theirs to make.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 04:18 AM
10

I don't think he had to say anything more. It was pretty clear that he thought what she was saying was bullshit, and simply let her continue talking, which made her look like more of an idiot. Considering how nervous she appeared at the beginning of the interview, it wouldn't surprise me if she felt awful about how she handled the interview. I mean, she went on The Daily Show, where Democrats are usually always welcome, and had Jon call her out for her sexist remarks. It might've been embarrassi…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter