TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ciderglove Archive

View 0 posts and 80 comments by Ciderglove on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, my claim is that you are the one advocating for cognitive dissonance; you are suggesting that we disregard the evidence of our senses and intuition, and consider a 31-year old to be in the same stage of life as a 55-year old.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 02:37 PM
1

No, that's not what I meant by mental effort. I meant that the idea that a 31-year old is 'middle aged' is obviously absurd, and so presents a needless kink or hurdle in the operation of the mind. Better to remove the obstruction, to allow thought to flow harmoniously.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 06:52 PM
3

If 'youth' begins at birth, then it must simply be the case that it lasts longer than middle age or old age. Any framework which casts a 31-year-old as middle-aged is not worth the mental effort it takes to sustain or recall it.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 05:19 PM
7

Your mistake is in assuming that 'youth' begins at 0. In fact, 'youth' begins at 18.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 11:48 PM
13

Is 34 "early middle aged'?
/r/MensRights15/08/25 05:53 PM
-2

And I was pissed off at the use of the term "conspiracy theories". This is a woman's life we're talking about; that kind of arrogant complacency is disgusting.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 06:47 PM
0

Radical feminists such as Jonathan Sumption and Peter Hitchens? To be sceptical of Letby's conviction is not a feminist thing.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 02:14 PM
1

Are you in the UK? This is the definition of rape by English law.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 02:47 AM
41

Yes, you're right, cartoons should be exactly as bleak and mundane as real life. That's the whole point of them!
/r/MensRights16/02/21 12:28 AM
2

That quotation might seem absurd to you now, but that is largely because our lives are made easier - and the physical differences between the sexes are largely obviated - by technology. If the male sex had ceased to exist some time in the Neolithic or Paleolithic, things probably would turn out the way the quotation describes.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 02:27 PM
41

Why should sexists lose their jobs? Should only people with what you judge to be the correct opinions be allowed to earn a living?
/r/MensRights09/02/21 02:25 PM
3

He says 'thank you again', yet only thanks you once. Lying pigdog.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 04:14 AM
-20

Are you aware that 'bias' is a noun?
/r/MensRights22/01/21 03:51 PM
10

Do not study English at university unless you are certain you can avoid going insane. The propaganda (including radical feminism) is more intense than at school, not less. Also, NB that creative writing degrees exist mainly to provide employment for people with creative writing degrees. That sounds flippant, but it is true. If you want to write, then do what you mention elsewhere: have a way of making money, and write when you can. By the way, it's also worth pointing out that you certainly woul…
/r/MensRights10/01/21 07:55 PM
5

It's not so much to do with examples as the total effect. What have I learned by the time I finish reading the last slide? There are several scattered summaries of the findings of a handful of random surveys and studies, but they have not been drawn together in a unified vision which reveals some important truth. Instead, they just appear, with no explanation for why. The thing about this area is that you can find surveys and studies which support almost any position, and contradict each other. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/20 06:58 PM
1

I do not like this. It gives the impression of conveying important facts and analysis, but is superficial, poorly written, and confusingly meaningless.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/20 05:03 PM
2

Mature, caring people are supportive when people open up to them, but not everyone is mature and caring. Plenty of men just freeze up and ignore it when their friends reach out to them. It’s a natural instinct to be repulsed by weakness — albeit an instinct that wisdom circumvents.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 12:10 AM
21

*dnam
/r/MensRights07/07/20 06:53 PM
30

*libel
/r/MensRights07/07/20 05:18 PM
3

If you have the time (and if you haven't already) you should read his essays, too. The Lion and the Unicorn, Antisemitism in Britain and Arthur Koestler are particularly good, but they're all brilliant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/20 01:08 PM
5

You want me to live for eighty years in the universe without making fun of anyone? I don't trust your philosophy, and I don't believe much wisdom has gone into it.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 12:10 PM
2

Is OK. You were making the very important point that male circumcision is totally alien to most of the world.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 05:58 PM
7

You misunderstand. They were talking about FGM, and they were not suggesting that everywhere beyond the western world it is accepted. They did not give an exhaustive list.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 04:56 PM
1

I am so far from a third-wave feminist that it is not even funny. Men’s rights are an extremely important issue - which is why I don’t like it when bitter, hateful people make us all look bad.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 02:48 PM
1

Oh, I was never intending to argue that you yourself were bitter or misogynistic. And yes, I have a strong strain of cynicism, but I find it just takes the life out of things. I wish I could make myself a cheese sandwich, but unfortunately I am very far from either cheese or bread. But many happy cheese sandwiches to you.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:25 PM
2

I am not assuming that he did explicitly offer to buy her drinks. I don’t know why you think I am. The way we narrativise the world is indeed based on experience. And some people have so many bad experiences that they start to assume the worst in everyone. That is to say, they become cynical, and, perhaps, bitter.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:17 PM
0

I didn’t ignore it at all. That is what the second half of my comment is disagreeing with. ‘Arguing that what someone says is due to emotion, rather than reason, is a perfectly justifiable approach in an argument.’
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:14 PM
1

Am I twisting your argument? I do apologise. What precisely is wrong with what I said?
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:08 PM
1

You misunderstand me quite significantly. I am not making any assumptions about the tone in which he wrote the comment. My issue is with the substance of what he said. He assumes that the man did not explicitly offer to buy her drinks. Nowhere in the post is that evident. In light of this, one has to wonder what motivated him to impose such a partisan and baseless narrative on the situation.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:08 PM
0

The idea that bitterness is something to be ashamed of is something that only you have said; don’t put words in my mouth. And arguing that what someone says is due to emotion, rather than reason, is a perfectly justifiable approach in an argument.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:03 PM
1

I am not at all saying that because both members of both sexes do bad things, we should not talk about it. i am suggesting that when a woman does a bad thing, it does not reflect on the moral character of women in general. There is a great deal more difference between a bad woman and a good woman than there is between a good woman and a bad woman. The reason I mention bitterness, which you take such issue with, is that at least one commenter (/u/colpugno - the one my comment above yours is reply…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:02 PM
1

My problem was never with the post, which is harmless. It was in the reaction to it of a particular commenter, whose jumping to conclusions was not based in humour.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:54 PM
1

/u/bulletholeteddy , the user at the top of this comment chain, who, knowing virtually nothing of the facts of what actually happened in the situation referred to in the post, criticised the woman based on an imaginary and baseless version of what happened that he made up himself. When you first replied to my comment, I pointed out that it didn’t seem like you’d read the comment I was replying to. This seems to confirm that.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:51 PM
0

I’m not bullying you, and I certainly wouldn’t claim to have the power to shame you. You are free to disagree with my judgement, and your reputation, both on the internet and in real life, will not suffer for it.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:47 PM
1

I didn’t say you were toxic, did I?
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:40 PM
-2

If you cannot see how clearly what you write is suffused with bitterness and anger at women, there is no point in me trying to respond to you.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:40 PM
0

I am not female. Why do you assume I am? Why are you talking about ‘revenge’? Why do you say ‘she thought she was playing him’? These are baseless assumptions which seem to be shaped by a bitterness at women. I am not sure you are the best person to be dismissing allegations of misogyny. Yes, certainly, plenty of women ‘take liberties’ and hurt people, but: 1) There is no evidence that that happened here, and 2) There are plenty of men who treat other people just as poorly as some women do. The …
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:38 PM
-7

I’m not sure why you call me “ma’am”. It is useful to consider why the guy created exactly the hypothetical situation that he did. Why imagine the woman to be at fault rather than the man? Why be so vindictive about it? For me, the answer is that it is very likely that he is a bitter misogynist. Perhaps for you it is not.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:23 PM
-20

I see you have not read this comment chain very carefully. It started when someone got angry at the woman in the post, saying that the man in the story had not explicitly stated that he was buying her drinks. There was no reason for the user to think this was true; all he wanted to do was get angry and self-righteous and criticise a woman. That’s not using ‘logic and well crafted arguments’. And you are blatantly wrong when you say ‘No one here is toxic’; at least one person demonstrably is, as …
/r/MensRights02/09/18 01:49 PM
-29

This sub is a toxic hole of self-pity and misogyny.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 01:11 PM
23

How do you know that?
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:01 AM
3

I take your point. It sounds like a way for men who have nothing real to offer to manipulate people into not seeing how boring they are.
/r/seduction23/05/18 11:55 PM
11

What a horrid thing to say.
/r/seduction23/05/18 10:52 PM
3

Why would you want to?
/r/seduction23/05/18 09:09 PM
-1

Sententious self-satisfaction is a universal German trait.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:56 PM
3

Now that's just sexist.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:55 PM
10

Cue, not que.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:47 AM
1

'Affects', not 'effects'.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 11:29 PM
13

This is a place for the reporting and discussion of feminism's encroachment upon men's rights; surely you can understand why people talk about feminism here.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:44 PM
4

Also true.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 10:13 PM
2

We all make mistakes. Your post makes up for it.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 10:13 PM
11

*rite
/r/MensRights13/10/14 07:42 PM
3

This does have basis in demographic fact. An overabundance of young men is never a good thing for the stability of a society.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 01:36 PM
16

Comics say things.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 09:53 AM
1

Novels.
/r/seduction06/07/14 02:01 PM
1

Read some books.
/r/seduction06/07/14 07:08 AM
3

The fact that she seems entirely uninterested in you overrides any problems you might think you created by making her pay.
/r/seduction05/06/14 10:01 AM
2

43 is not old, for the love of god.
/r/seduction21/04/14 12:48 AM
17

What has happened to this subreddit?
/r/seduction04/04/14 07:59 AM
21

Escalating is the best way to practice escalating.
/r/seduction05/03/14 10:52 PM
5

I needed this.
/r/seduction22/02/14 11:50 PM
1

One of the least attractive things it is possible to do is to analyse yourself or your relationship with someone in front of other people. It is self-indulgent and reeks of low confidence. If you want to get out of the friend zone, dont take any notice of her when she treats you like a friend.
/r/seduction26/01/14 04:47 PM
1

Oh cool, we can put this on the shelf with the 157,661 other posts telling us about new members.
/r/seduction23/01/14 04:04 PM
-7

The perpetual inner-game gushing continues.
/r/seduction29/12/13 11:38 PM
3

Top stuff. Having fun is what it's all about, and it keeps you original, rather than trying to recite what you think you should logically be saying.
/r/seduction01/11/13 11:54 PM
17

Don't panic. The modern Western world has conditioned loads of guys to behave like you do, and as long as we acknowledge the problem, we can fix it. The first thing to make clear is that there's absolutely nothing wrong with being a pleasant and friendly person. People, male and female, like friendly people. So don't beat yourself up over that part; the only problem comes when you are so 'nice' that you are incapable of standing up for yourself. (By the way, the word 'nice' originally meant 'dul…
/r/seduction09/10/13 01:40 PM
2

When you wake up in the morning, is your voice deep?
/r/seduction03/10/13 06:06 PM
61

What this says to me is that people who are really confident in themselves feel less pressure to show off or clown in front of other people.
/r/seduction03/10/13 10:57 AM
1

She sounds like she is violently insane. Anyone who can't run with a joke like that is stupid, and to be avoided.
/r/seduction17/09/13 03:49 PM
3

What are you talking about?
/r/seduction17/09/13 01:52 PM
10

She sounds like the sort of woman who /r/theredpill would use to confirm their hatred of females.
/r/seduction17/09/13 01:09 PM
1

Very good stuff. This is the kind of thing that comes naturally to some people, but others need to consciously work at.
/r/seduction16/09/13 03:04 PM
1

I like having sex with people.
/r/seduction16/09/13 01:09 PM
1

I would check out /r/londonsocialclub There's loads of londoners on reddit, but I've never understood why there isn't a dedicated London seddit group.
/r/seduction09/09/13 04:31 PM
2

I've found that you can talk about pretty much anything with women, but if you're saying something that's a bit boring or might be seen as grasping at straws, you have to be careful not to come across as creepy by doing a weird smile or something at the same time.
/r/seduction01/09/13 06:54 PM
1

Mate, you went for a kiss. Sure, you might have missed out on laying the groundwork, but now you know you've got the confidence to go for it. Don't let one miss get you down.
/r/seduction01/08/13 11:44 PM
5

This is good.
/r/seduction27/07/13 08:07 PM
0

Sorry, this made no sense. It was grammatical, and there were proper sentences with real words in, but it just didn't say anything... Maybe give it an introduction?
/r/seduction10/06/13 09:36 PM
1

Think about it: you never make a real friend and then regret it. When you get older, and you don't spend as much time meeting new people, you'll want to have as many old friends to fall back on as possible. Otherwise you turn around at 40, and you realise that there's no-one with you.
/r/seduction10/03/13 09:16 PM
1

Talk you out of what? You seem to have a problem that time is passing, and you haven't slept with any girls yet. Well, time is indeed passing, which is perhaps why you have this niggling feeling that time is passing. So, if you want to do something before you have to go back home, do it! I suppose that your problem might be that you regret all the time that you've spent there and haven't slept with anyone. That time's already gone, so there's no point worrying about it; particularly when you sti…
/r/seduction10/03/13 06:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter