TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CissyXS Archive

View 1 posts and 328 comments by CissyXS on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

CissyXS/r/BlackPillScience18/04/19 03:52 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Women in all Gulf countries need a guardian. Women in other MENA countries need a guardian de facto. And don't get me started on Afghanistan. Your region is flourishing with honor killings and child marriages, mate. And most of those victims are women. And you want the religion back so the guardianship is enforced and women would lose any autonomy they can have. But I want to know how exactly is religion supposed to help with gay rights?
/r/MensRights19/07/26 09:53 AM
-9

If we don't return to religion we will worship women soon as the god of this age. Religion is the reason gay people are oppressed, but you'd rather remain oppressed than see women get any normal treatment. Gay men in MENA can have gay sex. Gay men in MENA can get on a plane and move to another country. Gay men can travel alone. Gay men do not need a guardian to make a decision to study or travel. You guys don't care about men's rights. You just hate women having any rights.
/r/MensRights18/07/26 04:44 PM
2

Even today women don't usually "marry up", stats in more free societies (like the US) show they will "sleep up" before settling down with their equivalent. But marriage didn't exist in pre-Neolithic era. People just slept together, but still were monogamous for that period. But partners changed throughout the life. but hypergamy wasn't created by men Then explain, how come that prior to patriarchy almost all men reproduced but afterwards less and less men reproduced? Explain, why harems didn't h…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 06:43 PM
1

These scholars do not say that women's taste in men started during the agricultural era.... The main concept of hypergamy hypothesis is that women go for top 20%. But that is based on that y-chromosome bottleneck that happened after we established patriarchy and took women's choice away. Prior to that the rate of reproduction was closer to 1:1. Men and women reproduced at similar rate, which means women didn't go for the hottest and tallest 20%. unless you are suggesting men before were all the …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 06:15 PM
1

Yeah, I understand what you mean. Once one group starts developing technologically, the rest must either do the same or die out. Those who fail to adapt, just do not survive. And we're stuck in this loop of hierarchy: even if it starts as a democracy, the small group at the top will turn it into oligarchy sooner or later. Fortunately authoritarian societies kind of just suck at tech Unless it's backed up by tech magnates T_T
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 06:03 PM
1

Yep, once someone started this system, the rest had to follow. Also taxing in patriarchal society was easier: one father-one house. I've read that Rome had to get rid of Celtic matrilineal system for that reason exactly. But I've read it a long time ago, so I might be wrong about this. Edit: adding up on hunter-gatherer societies, they had a taboo on incest and those who breached that rule were likely executed. But patriarchy normalised it at some point to monopolise power. And cousin marriage w…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 05:35 PM
2

But does any of that suggest women had more choice in the past is what I am suggesting/asking. Hunter-gatherer societies were as close to egalitarianism as we can get. There was no need to control female sexuality, so women could sleep with anyone. The main theory is that humans likely practiced social monogamy, but 'devorce' was very common. We can still notice this pattern in foraging societies. Freedom is strongly tied to contribution and in hunter-gatherer societies women contribute more tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 05:26 PM
1

I mean prior to agriculture and patriarchy, we have genetic evidence of men and women reproducing at similar, very close to 1:1 rate. I still find it hard to believe, but so far that's the information I found. Once the patriarchy emerged, men started getting conscious about their children's paternity. But men also got greedy over resources. And to be honest, it was either you take someone else's resources or they take yours. The winners killed off the users and the women reproduced. The women wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 04:30 PM
1

The Y-chromosome bottleneck maps out to about 5,000 - 7,000 years ago, if I'm not mistaken, which is well after the start of the agricultural revolution. Even by your own marker of 15,000 years ago, that would not be "the moment" that agriculture emerged, if that's the argument you're making. Agriculture made patriarchal society possible. But patriarchy didn't happen in one day, it took time. Agriculture made possible gaining resources, which meant those resources now can be passed down on someo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 04:20 PM
2

You're talking about y-chromosome bottleneck, which happened after agricultural revolution. Meaning, the moment patriarchy was established and women lost their rights to choose a mate, suddenly way less men were reproducing. What we normally call "historically" is not all our 300000 years of history, but only 15000 years since the development of farming.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 02:32 PM
–

Adding to your comment, ironically it was men who viewed cleaning, cooking, child care as degrading, not women. Which is why anti-suffragette posters were warning men that shall suffragettes succeed, men will be forced to do that job. And also, the same men who propogate for women being housewives are the same men who use "dishwasher" and "make me a sandwich" as an insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 08:45 AM
–

Writers were the first psychologists, we can all learn from them. And those two were very good at showing why seduction matters for both genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:04 AM
–

Some of you have never read de Maupassant or de Laclos, and it shows.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 12:58 AM
3

Men on this sub really believe that girls who grew up with loving dads dream of becoming subservient to men. Dominant and charismatic men do not rise their daughters to be submissive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 12:49 AM
1

Admitting to being child free is currently be viewed as a crime in Russia. The country is so pro-family school girls are encouraged to get pregnant and promised preferential treatment when applying to university. instead of having kids, what do these "traditonal women do" focus on thier careers They'll get killed if they practice sex outside marriage. It's not like they have many options. They don't have autonomy in the sense we do: they can be 20/30/40/50 and still have no right to move to anot…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 12:32 AM
6

Doubt. We have very traditional and religious regions in our country, and despite the lack of feminism there is a growing trend of women who chose to remain unmarried virgins (honour killings are a thing there) instead of getting married and having children. Those women just focus on career and religion instead. Childlessness is a global trend it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 11:12 PM
1

It shouldn't, but that's what happens when the outcome depends on someone else. Having house shouldn't be hard, but it is nowadays. Which is why young people are obsessed over housing crisis, the same way they are obsessed with relationship crisis. A lot of things are broken in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:10 AM
1

That's a good way to lose interest in women. Once it's that easy, it loses its appeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:24 AM
–

Yes. Can it be solved without forcing unwilling group of people into forming families for the sake of civilization? Can the lonely people be content with adoption/surrogacy and robot partner, once they are made more human-looking?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:11 PM
–

I made no point. Just pointed out the opposite of the trend you mentioned exists, which made me curious if there are stats on which group is bigger.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:03 PM
–

How do you suggest this problem is solved without force?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:01 PM
–

The opposite also exists, when conservative women suddenly divorce their husbands around the age 36-40 and turn to life of hedonism. Do we know which group is bigger?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 12:00 PM
6

Personally, no. I just don't see a problem with that. There are tons of reasons for people to miss out on building relationships, especially nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 09:47 PM
11

How can unreasonable bad women rise reasonable good daughters? Do you think there are so many men globally who want to rape children (and in more patriarchal societies they manage to make it legal), because they aren't taught better? Why aren't men focused on teaching men to do better then?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 03:36 PM
9

Valid point. But maybe she's not looking at a woman with women's eyes? When I see a beautiful girl, I have an urge to spoil and protect her. Damn, you got me thinking now. What if it's less of a biology and more of a cultural conditioning?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 06:46 AM
9

Scrawny and harmless man can't protect her from men who aren't harmless- this is more of an evolutionary factor. Yet, there are women who still like men with the traits you described. But no one is entirely harmless, not even women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 04:55 AM
1

If it's in men's interest - it's accountability. If it's against men's interest - it's brainwashing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 06:58 AM
–

If someone conquers your country, do you believe they are within their rights to kill you simply because you're a man, then and rape your wife and daughters?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 08:35 AM
–

What is gender ratio in political arena in your country? Also, what stops men from pushing for even retirement age the same way they push for anti-abortion laws around the world? Why men find it easier to fight for women's oppression than for the improvement of men's lives?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 08:31 AM
1

You're not being rational, which is why you keep using uppercase. And I'm banned on that sub. Have a nice day.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:42 PM
1

I think most people don't see the difference between what they actually like and what they would like to like. Our morals don't always go hand-in-hand with our body's desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:32 PM
1

By using an exaple where shows that a child should be cautios of everyone, do you agree the position and example are garbage? No, I don't. Should a child be cautious of any stranger? Yes, I already said it in another comment. Does that mean a young girl should be less afraid of man? No, a man is a bigger threat than a woman. Clear your ears, because I won't repeat this again: a teen girl can fight a woman, but she can't fight against a man. How many women are raped by women and how many women ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:19 PM
0

Dude, I'm not changing my opinion. I explained how women are historically trained to be cautious of men and your anger and rage are misplaced right now. Do you believe I am wrong? Then be it. Don't you find amazing that with the bear is only if "they catch a human" but not with the otehr human? lmao How many women can outrun a man? Bears are still animals, most of them leave people alone unless threatened. I'm from Russia, I know by experience that bears are easier to deal with, - you just need …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:04 PM
0

EVERY FAIRY TALE is about strange danger, not men, not women, STRANGE. Yes, absolutely. And sometimes a stranger is a man. A woman has a chance against a fellow woman, but not against a man. Point where catholicism has it. Didn't grow up Catholic, but I'm pretty sure most Catholics practiced chaperoning young women for a reason. Most men are not emotionally incontinent idiots I'm gonna just point at places like Afghanistan or KSA, where men prefer their daughters to die in natural disasters inst…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:43 PM
0

They don't fear or hate men overall. But they fear them in specific context. For example, you might not think women are a danger to children in a day-to-day life. But to a child a stranger woman is a potential threat. Maybe even a bigger one than a man, because children tend to trust women. There is a reason someone like Epstein used women to lure in young girls. If they're interested in interacting with me, they can, and if they aren't, that's okay too because I respect their boundaries. You so…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:44 PM
0

I assume you're someone young. And it's understandable that you find the whole 'man or bear' thing disheartening. I'm not trying to change your mind, but I want to give you an gist of how women form an answer to that question. Since childhood girls are warned against men. And it's not a new thing. The Little Red Riding Hood is basically a story made to warn girls against the dangers men pose to them. It's not just the society, it's the father's as well whompreach that. No woman is as misandristi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:28 PM
–

Stay fit. Practice charm and social skills. Do some research on what places rich women visit and go there yourself. Bonus point, if you develop a fitting archetype.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 11:35 PM
2

Dark romance is still a fiction. No real person is getting kidnapped, raped or tortured. Meanwhile some porn can get extremely...questionable. Didn't a few years ago some porn actress die during the the act?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 08:47 PM
2

Well, Spillar has a delulu take. And the feminist foundation should fire her.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:47 PM
3

I've never heard a single feminist use that claim and I grew up on tumblr radfem manifestos. Does patriarchal violence exist? Absolutely. Is all violence patriarchal violence? Absolutely not.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 02:49 PM
2

Google says Duluth model is pseudo-science. What branch of law is supporting that idea? Afaik violence is violence in the eyes of the law. women only use violence in self-defense. Such an unsustainable claim that only feminist weirdos and anti-feminist weirdos alike would cling to. Aside from a niche feminist branch who else supports this idea? What's their opinion on lesbian and gay relationship? Or do they believe no violence happens in those couples? Also, in this thread someone already menti…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 02:47 PM
4

Abortions can get outlawed but they don't stop from existing. Ever. You just increase maternal mortality of fertile age women, and in twenty years increase crime rates. So while you get women killed, you also increase the chances of getting stabbed yourself in the dark alley by one of the unwanted kids that was brought up by street life after their mom abandoned them If that's the kind of risk you're willing to take, then ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:14 PM
3

You're talking about paper abortion, not paternity fraud. That's different. I live in a country where men can give up their paternal rights in exchange for being freed from providing for the child. And the equivalent of paper abortion exists if both parents agree. And it didn't require abortions getting outlawed to achieve. (Tho they might now for different reasons)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:07 PM
5

A leverage would be not having children en masse until women agree to see paternity fraud as a crime. So why not focus on encouraging men to not procreate with women that do not respect their paternal rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:01 PM
7

Explain something that doesn't make sense to me? Because I fail to see why would anyone shut down a shelter in the first place. Besides, people in this thread are saying that a lot of shelters for men are organised by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 01:59 PM
1

Okay, I browsed it and it's more about power dynamics, which can happen even in the most egalitarian society. Still, doesn't explain my question: how abortion rights conflict with paternity fraud laws, for example?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 01:56 PM
5

How exactly women's interests and safety conflict with men's?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 01:46 PM
9

abortion rights You seem oblivious to the fact that some men want and need the abortion rights too. Married women need abortions too, and probably more often than non-married women. Let's a say a married couple has 3 children, they can't currently afford more children but they would like to in the future. The birth control fails (imagine, even with tied tubes some women manage to get pregnant). What is this couple is supposed to do now? You're not just punishing women, you're punishing married m…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 01:44 PM
7

Men should vote against abortion, men should vote against anything that is important to women. My main question is instead of voting against women's interests and safety, can't you just vote for men's interests and safety? Also, do you realise that banning abortions will just open a can of all new problems which will also effect men? The best case scenario is that women will just leave for countries with better laws for women. What then? But women have shown that they are not reliable ally to me…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 01:29 PM
7

Can anyone explain to me who is fighting against DV shelters for men and what are their arguing points? Let's say I decide to open a shelter, how does anyone else get a say in who can or cannot apply for a shelter?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 01:18 PM
2

nothing but wishful thinking, not based in objective reality. No more wishful thinking than advising girls to marry young and have children earlier in hopes of building a good family. You are determined to be bitter. And you are more than welcome to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 02:55 PM
1

There's no guarantees in life aside from death. But by filtering out selfish women, a man will get closer to finding a woman that cares for him. The question is: are you willing to risk loneliness to find happiness?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 02:43 PM
2

As opposed to normal relationship where the man takes care of his woman, and the woman takes care of her man. The currency might be different, but the intention is the same - to make the life of your partner better and nicer.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 02:00 PM
3

I understand your point. And I understand that having limited options suck. But the more you give up in relationship without reciprocation the less you will have in the future. And in the end you will burnout and feel used. This is where that so-called abundance mentality should be applied to. Not in a angry and violent way, but in a 'I don't feel loved by you' kind of way.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 01:45 PM
1

We are talking about being romantic, not long-term attachment. Two different things. No, it's not. Since you insist that if something is absent in the folklore then it doesn't exist in the country at all. By that logic, women in Russia are not hypergamous since there are no proverbs about it. Somebody had to retract their stats because their methods were messed up. And where's the proof that the stats were retracted? All of them? And how reliable that new research is? If that's not true can you …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 08:54 AM
5

It's hardly a Russian alone thing. It's a universal trend. With statistics supporting it. Should be a universal proverb if all men are like this. No it doesn't need to. There are no proverbs about women chasing Chads either. Or about women chasing rich men. In Russian at least. Would you say, women in Russia are not hypergamous?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 08:39 AM
3

I don't need to do that. It's so widespread that it wouldn't even require a research, especially when you have as many relatives in medical field as I do. There's a Russian proverb that says, "a man loves his sister rich, and his wife healthy." Proverbs don't become part of a culture without a reason. It was a soft way of telling women they should prioritize their health or else they'll get left for someone healthier.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 08:19 AM
3

Op, the description you give is...bleak. It looks like a man is paying the woman to stay in his life. If you see that your efforts aren't reciprocated, break up. There are women who give gifts to their boyfriends/husbands and show care and love, don't settle for women who do not love you. Also, from personal experience, this is the kind of situation where men could use their own advice: don't chase Chad. Or a girl that is not that much into you. You can slightly overinvest in the beginning of re…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 08:16 AM
-4

Unless she gets sick. Once the woman can't be of use, the love is no longer there.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 08:04 AM
5

I think women differ on this one. Some absolutely need to feel safe to be comfortable enough for intimacy. Some less so. And some might even be aroused by not feeling entirely safe: there are women who like men who might kill them. And I advise any sane man to stay away from the latter group.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:34 AM
5

I'm just gonna agree with what was already mentioned: - Paternity fraud. Should be treated as a crime. - Body shaming men over their height, dick size or anything else honestly. If you don't like something, just move on. No need to verbally abuse people. - I'd add 'expecting a man to pay for everything', but it's an outcome of classic patriarchal model, so not exactly a bad behaviour I guess, since men welcome women being dependant and submissive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:06 AM
2

Hierarchies are more important in school and almost cease to exist in colleges and universities where I live. At school you're part of the group and you either get accepted or become a loner. From what I remember school hierarchies aren't rigid either, a leader changes from time to time. As for what was the most important trait? Social skills and confidence, - basically charisma. Everything else: looks, good marks, etc. came secondary to it. In university you just have friends. And from then on,…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 09:52 AM
5

I mean an extreme example is other adult woman in their 30s who will fangirl someone like Taylor swift or Beyonce, by definition putting themselves below another woman. Have you seen the "imagine serving that table" art, depicting Andrew Tate, Musk and the likes of them? It was made by a man and reposted by men. Men fantasize about being a literal waiter or a servant to rich and popular men, and you're surprised women fangirl singers?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 09:47 AM
9

Responding to the words does not show understanding Sorry, I don't think I underestand what you mean here (not a native speaker). Do you mean it as, 'we respond to the message, not words'? So do they understand or not? There are several options: - They misinterpreted your message - They are misinterpreting your message on purpose - They are responding to a message you don't realise you're actually transferring - They are responding to a deeper layer of your message, that you might not even see y…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 10:40 AM
2

Lol fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 10:23 AM
9

The facts may remain the same, but the message changes based on the wording you choose. When you try to communicate something you must keep in mind how it will interpreted by the listener, not how you yourself interpret it. You might think women do not understand your points or argument, but it might be that they are responding to the message they perseive based on your choice of words.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 10:13 AM
39

I'll give you an example. "Luke, I'm your father." "Luke, I fucked your mom." In both cases the person fucked Luke's mom. But one sentence is intended to point out a blood relationship. The other is aimed to be an insult. Do you see why semantics and tone are important?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 09:50 AM
4

Yes, it's natural. That's why it's so common in the first place. And women make decisions based on that reality, which is why most modern women don't prioritize marriage until later in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 03:05 PM
7

The problem with the woman in discussion is not that she's following her emotions. It's that she's ignoring the lack of emotions on your side. Would she be having emotional connection with those other men if she got rid of her fixation on you? It's debatable. You're projecting male perception onto women. It's similar to how men perceive sex: to most men any sex is better than no sex. To most women no sex is better than bad sex. So it's hard for men to understand why would women willingly deny th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 11:40 PM
–

So what's your take on OP's advice to her?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 02:10 PM
–

Because perfection is the only way for a man to be safe in a relationships. Subjective perfection. I wonder if we understand the word 'safe' the same way. Do you think it's a realistic approach to life and relationship? If you asked me, a woman, I'd argue that even perfection won't make a non-delusional woman feel safe in relationship. The only guarantee in life is death, everything else is a wager. Humans are more complex than 'good' or 'bad'. In a previous comment you said a genuine affection …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 02:08 PM
–

The woman in question already did 'give herself away for free' as you put it. What about her?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 01:32 PM
–

I disagree that what he suggested is that. He didn't suggest using an unattractive man to make her life easier. I agree. But there's a strong belief in manospgere if the woman changes her former behavior, then she's necessarily settling and will never have the same level of desire for her husband/boyfriend that she did for others. Every time women try to argue with that, they are called liars. This is why I was curious to see men to chime in and discuss the post. It's not a betrayal to have fond…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 01:28 PM
–

Do you agree that he offered her the AF/BB strategy? I understand your points. His advice isn't bad overall, but it's gets demonised the moment women apply it to real life. Right in this sub as well. “he’s not bad looking but maybe you guys have a lot of common beliefs/values that line up and over time that raw attraction will build” He suggest she chooses someone who shares her values in hopes of developing raw attraction along the way. This might happen and might not happen. But women are accu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 12:59 PM
–

So you gave her what redpill men call AF/BB strategy advice? 1. Don't sleep with a man right away, if you want ltr. 2. Don't pursue the guy you viscerally desire for marriage, because he has too many options. Marry a sweet and loyal guy. I thought men here hated that behavior? For the years I spent on this sub men constantly claim that it's insulting to be made to wait for sex, when she slept with all those 'chads'. Another group of men claim that the sweet guy would never get the same quality o…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 07:17 AM
5

Your answer made me tear up. Sometimes people with unhappy childhood have such a big reservoir of love in them, it would be a waste not to pour that love into a family of their own. There's something cathartic about the ability to create and give others something you didn't receive yourself. It's like turning wasteland into a forest.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 04:39 AM
6

Just to play a devil's advocate. 1) You're robbing her of experiencing love with a man her age. 2) Men live on average ten years less than women. A 40 y.o. man marries a 20 y.o. woman. He dies at 60. She's now 40 y.o. woman that is out of her prime but still have on average another 30-40 years to live. Alone. But my personal view is every choice comes with risks. There's no guarantees in any relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:43 AM
–

so they either adjust Years go by, and I still have to say that no, most women who are in happy relationship with average men didn't need to adjust. They just like a broader spectre of men from the get go. In fact, some only like average men. In fact, there's something like "too beautiful" when it comes to male beauty, - when a man is so beautiful, he stops being sexually attractive. Sometimes that spectre broadens on its own as they age, because women's testosterone increase with age. To not be…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 04:09 AM
–

that's her preference now That was probably her preference to begin with. She won't learn What could she learn from this? That's the nature of her attraction. She's into very limited group of men. Unfortunately for her that group of men have a large pool of options. Now she has to choose between staying with someone she doesn't desire due to her biology, and being a side-piece to the guy she desires, unless a miracle happens. It's less of a story about a dumb woman that doesn't learn from her mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 10:50 PM
–

Dead bedrooms the guy Sounds like she didn't much of a chance for happiness to begin with. Because she'd dead bedroom the good guy you're talking about too.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 10:27 PM
1

To an extent. Do women try to find the best possible option? Yes. (And so do men tbh). But what exactly determines the best is different for women: status, money, looks, etc. A very rare woman can acquire all the above. Men think there's some magic pill to female happiness, which basically the old grandma's advice: don't marry the guy you love, marry the guy that loves you. Except, men call it "marry a guy without options". What they forget is that once such guy acquires a girl, he wants more, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 09:42 AM
6

This argument gets thrown around for years. Men hate women for settling for a safe option, but hate women for choosing men based on primal instinct. Can't win. Not to mention, we don't know if the women in question chose a hot guy to marry. It's very possible the married the good guy and life still turned out to be unhappy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 12:48 PM
1

Okay, I'm almost convinced, even though it's strange that someone can constantly participate in an activity and learn nothing from it. Aside from enthusiasm, what else contributes to a woman being good at sex? Creativity? Flexibility?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 11:08 AM
20

Personally, I think nowadays girls are less into older men overall, which is why men talk about this topic so much. I saw a video where a man in his 30s tries to hit on a girl in her early 20s in a gym. The girl rejects him based on the age and he keeps pestering her, "why are you so serious?", "so what if I like you?", etc. In the comment section men were angry that the girl dares to say that he was old for her. They feel entitled to date a younger woman even if she rejects them, they feel enti…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 06:28 PM
3

Young adult women certainly have a right to make poor life choices if they wish to, but a significantly older person who helps them for their own self-service is definitely taking advantage. Yes. And it's the sacrifice we must make to maintain the autonomy of women overall. Can't go from "women can't choose for themselves, so their fathers muat be the ones making the choice" to "let's take women's choice away to save them from dangerous men". Same eggs, different side.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 06:20 PM
6

Also women The fraction of women that married children was miniscule compare to men. And the fraction of female child rapists is still way smaller than male one. How many countries there are currently where 50 y.o. men are fighting to keep their rights to marry a 10 y.o. girl? Describe a single episode in history where women did the same? The closest is gypsies where again 16 y.o. girls are forced (!) to marry 12 y.o. boys. but women often overlook that kind of thing in other types of relationsh…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 06:13 PM
3

The first one is just a mix of sour grapes and wishful thinking. Some women try to convince themselves that it's naivety and not the looks that make a younger girl more attractive than them. But men do claim they find naivety attractive, so there's that. Besides, we as humans had to invent laws to stop men from having sex with children, and they are still fighting against it. Just recently saw a post on Russian Instagram with 3k+ likes that describes the kind of girla men desire for sex at speci…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:42 PM
5

Means nothing legally, but I am still going to argue against a decent amount of society trying to label men as predators just because they don't like that men find younger women more attractive. What exactly predatory behaviour entails in your opinion? Or rather how do you think women are using that term?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 05:05 PM
9

What kind of accusations? That it's predatory? If the woman is of legal age, those accusations mean nothing. If it makes you feel better women accuse women of grooming too, no gender bias here. Take for example, Sam Taylor Johnson who started dating actor Aaron Taylor Johnson when he was 18, but knew him long before that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 04:12 PM
31

A better question is why we are bringing up the age gap question all the time? If it's legal, no one can stop you. So why does it matter what anyone says?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 03:44 PM
–

I think we need some examples on what exactly "holding accountable" entails? Is it punishing someone for misbehaviour? Is it verbal judgement? Personally, in real life I keep my opinions to myself unless someone asks me directly. That being said, do I think a woman that willingly got in relationship with a married man/addict/misogynist is some kind of victim? A victim of her own stupidity maybe. But to me they are the masters of their own unhappiness. What about a woman that married a traditiona…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:28 PM
10

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3604016/ The first one from the search results. My personal anecdotal experience confirms this (have a significantly younger sister that is way taller than me). But again, there might be an opposite examples too.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:27 PM
11

No, recent studies show that birth defects are tied to older fathers. While the children of older mothers tend to be taller than children of younger mothers. Could older maternal age be tied to birth defects? Yes, but since most older women have children with even older men it's still unclear who is exactly to be blamed for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 10:55 PM
13

Actually, 90% of eggs are gone before a girl hits puberty. Just don't use that as a propaganda to breed children now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 10:43 PM
1

This is a very valid point. It seems to a lot of people high libido is more of phase than part of their nature. And I know a few cases when the same remains true for men as well. Curious about the reasons for such change in behaviour: is it age or is it commitment that changes them?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 01:35 PM
–

I am discussing this in a good faith. Nor am I someone advocating for hook up culture. But I believe my personal views shouldn't stand in the way of rational observation. Your cooking example doesn't really stand because if some chief wants to be hired by these fancy restaurants you spoke about, the first thing they'll ask him about is his experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 10:06 PM
–

I'd think his wife was the better lay for him than any porn star. For him, yes. But I asked about the next guy she encounters. Her competition is someone who knew different guys with different bodies. While the woman in discussion had only ever known one guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 09:43 PM
13

The premise isn't whether or not they need to be good at sex to get high n-count. It's whether or not high n-count gives one an experience that makes them good at sex with time. Can you give a comparison of high n-count women and low n-count women that were better at sex than the former?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 08:07 PM
–

Well, here you go. Who is better at sex overall (not with specific person): a prostitute or a monogamous woman who has only ever had one partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 07:17 PM
–

I'm not an expert, porn actress sounds like a most obvious answer. But okay, give me an example of a woman whose profession or hobby makes them very good at sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 07:12 PM
–

And how many people the gold medalist wrestles to get that gold medal? Lol A whole lot of different people.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 07:08 PM
–

Very dumb logic its like driving every type of car once This is the category that knows an approach to any car. vs driving few trucks and lesrning about those trucks througly. This the category that drives few cars but thoroughly. No need to resolve to insults, we're ina debate sub. And I'm not advocating for promiscuity, just pointing out that people who engage in specific action are likely to be good at it with time. Just tell me, who do you think is better at sex, a porn actress or a woman wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 06:55 PM
39

Who said you can't? Whose permission do you need?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 12:11 PM
63

Not that I'd give any advice on marriage but expecting promiscuous people to be better at sex than non-promiscuous ones kinda makes sense? Who cooks better: someone who has been cooking different foods for years or someone who's just starting to cook? Who is better at swimming: someone who has years of experience or someone who is only learning to swim? Experience contributes to skill pretty much in any field, but for some reason men expect sex to be the only exclusion and only when it comes to …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 12:01 PM
6

Didn't expect to tear up in this sub first thing in the morning. Nothing selfish or pathetic about your words, man. I hope you find the person who loves you as much as you love them, and the two of you build a happy family. And that you'll never feel lonely again.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 05:36 AM
0

Being unapologetic about who you are. There was a good post on this site about a short ugly guy who had great success with women. The main point was that he was unbothered by any criticism about his looks or pretty much anything about him.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 01:00 PM
1

And women that use sperm donors rely on the donor's financial support? But you're correct about less women having children overall. Personally speaking, I think it would be a good thing, but the birthrates would be falling even more and it's not exactly a good outcome for the society.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 06:49 AM
6

The end result is the same. Financial abortion: the father refused to contribute to the upbringing the child and gives up his rights for them. Sperm donor: a person who sells his seed, but doesn't contribute to the child's upbringing. The first one gets sex. The second one gets money. Either way the child is raised by the mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 09:07 PM
4

Using sperm donor is a financial abortion in a way tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 08:07 PM
4

With the birthrates getting lower and lower, should we discourage women from having children more? Asking without judgement, just curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 08:06 PM
2

I'm not a fan of artificial insemination, but I'm going to act as a devil's advocate here. I highly doubt that these women just couldn't find a nice man to have kids with. You do realise that being a wife requires something more than just making one baby? What if that woman can find a nice man but she's not sure she'll be a good wife to him? What if she's not attracted to him enough? And what if the man she's attracted to doesn't want a child with her? Even if you don't want the commitment, it's…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 07:59 PM
3

Did you just compare sexualising adult men to sexualising children? Why??
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 01:27 PM
–

One is traumatic events in my childhood Sorry to hear that. Hope you're doing well now. I don't support the exploitation of men many femdoms encourage. I'm not familiar with this, so I assume you mean financial exploitation? I also do not think sexually dominance or submission in a relationship should determine that a relationship is either male or female led. It is completely possible to be copartners in a relationship despite sexual preferences or kinks. I agree, despite my earlier statement. …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 06:46 AM
–

Thank you for an insight! being an object of desire is very gratifying. So the same reason women like it. We're not so different after all. I personally work a job which often requires me to tell people what to do and make tough decisions in difficult situations. Seems to be a common pattern. I've read that it's usually men with jobs requiring them to be dominant that enjoy femdom. Were you interested in femdom since younger age or did you develop it later in life, if you don't mind my question?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 06:36 AM
2

or are they just expecting to be plessured passively? I think there are different reasons for it. Some are lazy. Some, indeed, expect to be passively pleasured. I even heard a woman brag, "I don't need to be good at sex. I'm beautiful enough to starfish it and the man would still enjoy it more than with talented but unattractive woman." Took me by surprise, but I guess there are women who believe that if you put in some work, you're not desirable enough. But there's also a social conditioning im…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 02:45 PM
5

Even if the men approach the woman for dominatrix service, they (men) are the ones who act as the object of desire. We're talking about symbolism here. The real femdom would be a natural female-led relationship, I think. Where the man is the object of desire because the woman wants him to be. I just remembered that one of the reasons women like m/m fanfiction is because they can break away from that maledom/femsub scenario. We could question, why not just opt for femdom instead of m/m, but perha…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 12:41 PM
10

I'm someone who's leaning towards gentle femdom. I think it's less popular than maledom, because historically women were the object of desire, hence women's responsive libido as opposed to men's proactive libido. The gender dynamics usually was swapped due to age difference (older woman/younger man) or power imbalance in favour of a woman. Women also associate dominant role with the one who pursues the other person, and often times a person who is yet to reciprocate feelings. Which is a common t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 11:52 AM
-6

Do you accept an answer from a woman? when women is in a relationship , they still buy many clothes , to get attention from strangers ? The competition over that man doesn't cease to exist just because they're dating/married. The moment she stops dressing up and investing into her looks, he will claim she let herself go and decide to replace her. Happens all the time.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 01:19 PM
8

Wouldn't that lead to a dead bedroom? If she chooses someone who is into her, but she isn't into him? Or do you mean "date domeone with whim you have mutual attraction, but who doesn't fit your criteria of a perfect man"? If it's the second, then it's a pointless advice, because women already do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 03:32 PM
–

Paper abortion should be a thing. Unless it's a child born to a married couple. Overall, women should only give birth to a child if they're willing to raise it alone, shall something happen to the father.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 03:17 PM
4

The one I'm in relationship with.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 04:14 PM
8

Don't you think she would have married a 35 year-old man if she found him attractive? She didn't marry one because she didn't want one. Red Pill men love to give two advices: Leave hot guys your age and marry a man 15-20 years your senior. Fuck your husband regularly. And they don't even realise how often those two sentiments contradict each other. Not to mention how short-lived the sex life will be between them. She will be in her 30s and often hornier than in her 20s when the dude will be appr…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 03:20 PM
9

Why it's so hard to understand that a lot of young women just don't want to fuck older men? When I was 17 I thought 25 year-olds were old. In fact, the only girls who liked older men in my experience were the girls who planned to marry for money. Everyone else wanted someone their own age or close to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 03:13 PM
2

love is not real. definitely not true love Let's agree to disagree. "Love" is not a good barometer for a relationship, because that is a chemical emotion. Relationships are long enough that our chemical makeup changes throughout. Love cannot sustain a relationship, but mutual respect and prioritization can. While I agree that a good relationship isn't sustainable without mutual respect, I disagree with your stance on love. Everything is emotion. Happiness, anger, love, even respect. Respect is n…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 02:08 PM
1

a good marriage would have both partners benefit No doubt, even though right in this thread RP men claim the woman is the one benefitting from it. But if a woman can't find the person she loves and who loves her back, how is not getting married just for the sake of marriage is a dumb move? What child wants to be born as a retirement plan?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 11:54 AM
4

But why does it matter? There are countless reasons to not get married. Not everyone is made for a family. Maybe they aren't sure they can be good mothers. Maybe they don't want to ever end up as a single mother and the only way to ensure it is to never have a child. And etc. Let's take an example. A young woman wants to have a family but only with a man she will love and be compatible with. She doesn't find that man. What is she supposed to do? Marry some random guy? What kind of man deserves t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 10:32 AM
–

Does AI pay for her dates? Does AI do anything for better besides paying lipservice? Maybe she doesn't need it. She's in her dream relationship with a perfect boyfriend, even if it's not real. Welcome to the future, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 06:49 PM
5

Yep, women are using character.ai. it's fun, but as it is with men only the most lonely ones will get attached to the ai bot.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 12:30 PM
1

Toxic people qre usually fun to be around at first. The toxic part comes into picture later. And that's why they are usually "toxic ex".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 12:58 PM
7

“Daddy” is a term or title that men earn first and foremost by being good in bed. That term was cringy enough, but you made it sound hella incestous.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 12:23 PM
2

Make a post, describing how exactly this model would work.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/23 05:36 PM
8

Some do it for men, some do it for other women and some do it for themselves. Which is why there are so many different types of makeup, and some of those are not attractive to men at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 08:17 AM
1

This is a good list.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/23 09:03 PM
–

Teen girls have unprotected sex -> get pregnant -> give up child for adoption
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 01:39 PM
3

And ot makes sense that women still need to work to support themselves when that happens
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 01:32 PM
3

Doesn't change fhe fact that there's always a risk of being dumped for another. Being dependent is always a risk
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 11:33 AM
–

Can't they adopt children?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 10:51 AM
–

Yet they hate on single mothers
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 10:50 AM
3

Yeah because men never leave their wives for someone younger and hotter /s
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 10:36 AM
5

Why would a wealthy 80 go for a 50yo and not 30yo?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 10:35 AM
1

all the women I have dated have been masters or phd, See, this is actually a counter-point to your post. You can date any women yet you go for women with masters and phd. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 11:44 PM
1

Not being dependable and hiding money is different tho. If either of us pretends not to have money, when our family needs it, then we clearly shouldn't be in relationship. If both of us contribute to family and both keep some money as a backup plan, then I do not see what's wrong with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 09:06 AM
9

I remember what kind of girls wanted older boyfriends when I was in my teen years. Girls who wanted specifically older boyfriends simply wanted two things: 1. The money he could provide. 2. A leverage in relationship that her younger age will grant her. That doesn't mean they didn't find guys their own age hot. They did, but guys their own age were for dating, older guys were for marriage. I am from post-Soviet country btw. I've known only two women who married someone older out of love.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 03:51 PM
2

What about people who don't like online dating? Why force them? What if they care less for looks and description and more about actual interaction? What if those 5 people (be they hot or not) are just weird and boring in real conversation? The whole idea is bananas
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 05:25 PM
1

It wasn't strength that got labeled "toxic" or we wouldn't be praising athletes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 06:45 AM
2

And more often than not they're not nice, they're just weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 08:18 PM
1

are they poor just because they are tribal? most tribes are abundant with resources. just because they don't have complex structured societies, doesn't mean they're poor. Damn...you're really stupid. polygamy isn't just women having multiple men. and how is that relevant to male virgins not being shamed, they were shamed, teaming up in a less favourable relationship with many men, is that last resort otherwise they would not reproduce shamefully and fail You don't even see the difference between…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 02:41 PM
1

Mosten don't want children. They want to have sex, but don't want children. a virgin is a failed man since the dawn of man. all men knew this. this shaped society and the males roles within it. Then why no one considers all the famous virgins I named earlier a failure? Society wants you to prove your worth and its not restricted to your ability to sire children. People remember Chingis khan because he fathered insane amount of kids, but because he was a terrific conqeror. Same with Ivar the Bone…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 02:38 PM
1

There matrilineal tribes where the family property is surpassed onto women, not men. And where family is ruled by women exist in China and Africa. The argument of polyandry (not polygamy) is relevant. A polyandrous unity of one women and several men contradicts to the idea of male-male competition. Why would you risk providing for another man's child? Yet such unities exist, because they were unlucky enough to live in resource-deficient area.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 01:33 PM
1

I once again have to say that just because you are not praised for something doesn't mean you are being shamed for it. Women are not praised for cowardice but theyare not shamed for it either. Men aren't praised for virginity but aren't shamed for it either. They shaming only exists in Western countries where women decided to come up with a counter-insult of 'slut'. Men insulted women for having sex for ages, then women started to insult men for the lack of sex. yes i agree that not all men are …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 01:28 PM
1

Oh, did I not? What is this then? Culture and society morals are made by environment. That's why in areas with scarce resources there more likely to be a matriarchy and polyandry despite humans being naturally patriarchical. To which you replied: no societies weren't matriarchal when they are scarce that is beyond false. Now, when I provided a source you claim that I " talked about poorer societies being more misandrist over men". Where did I say it?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 01:09 PM
1

Here, a quick check of polyandry page on wiki: "Polyandry is believed to be more likely in societies with scarce environmental resources. It is believed to limit human population growth and enhance child survival.[6][7] It is a rare form of marriage that exists not only among peasant families but also among the elite families.[8] For example, polyandry in the Himalayan mountains is related to the scarcity of land. The marriage of all brothers in a family to the same wife allows family land to re…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 12:24 PM
1

Dude I can't talk to someone who lack basic understanding pf Economics and ethology. and aka i did, i mentioned sperm wars, there is also the female brain and sex at dawn) The sperm wars is about male-male competition which basically exists because of the principle of female irreplaceability. Men compete because not every man needs to reproduce for survival of our kind. That book basically proves my point. Once again you didn't reply how Newton, Tesla and other virgins were punished for their vi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 12:17 PM
1

show me source, you cant just make up shit You need a source to know that power is based on economy? You can google that shit or study Economics. The person who is financially dependant on someone is subordinate. The one who contributes to a family economy is the one in power. The poorer class is more often overrepresented by single working women, who in that case supposed to be the household head you think? Upper class is mostly represented by rich men whose wives can enjoy leisure life, but th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 10:55 AM
1

no societies weren't matriarchal when they are scarce that is beyond false. They are up to this day. Okay, maybe we should call them non-patriarchical or matrilineal, because it's phisically impossible for a woman to force a man into submission. Nevertheless, the point stands: polyandry existed and exists. And the poorer class is always more matriarchal than the upper class, because the power imbalance is dictated by economic contribution to family income. No, our nature and nurture shapes our e…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 08:16 AM
1

Women need to be a part of a community to survive. It's what made women more social than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 05:40 PM
1

Obviously people will find a way judgeeach other either way. And virgins and sluts should just grow up and not get offended by truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 05:04 PM
1

As for why the stereotype was stronger for women - it's the same as today. It's exceedingly trivial for woman to find suitor, ergo, there must be something seriously wrong with a spinster per common sense. Men get a little bit of affirmative action in this judgement because they have inherent difficulty associated. But why does she have to? Maybe she doesn't want a family. Maybe they just don't like men or don't like to live with men. Maybe they never found someone to love. Back in the days spin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 04:47 PM
2

Being unmarried carried lower, way lower, status for women as well. What's your point? It had nothing to do with ability to have sex and family, it's because unmarried people became a burden to society with time. It was a not so uncommon scenario in USSR: man lives a bachelor's life, despite ot being extremely easy to get married, and then in old age he imposes on his nephews and their children, who had to take care of him till the end of his life. See why unmarried men and women were pressured …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:17 PM
1

Culture and society morals are made by environment. That's why in areas with scarce resources there more likely to be a matriarchy and polyandry despite humans being naturally patriarchical. Plenty of men were "useful" but still didn't reproduce Were those men scorned by society for that? Is that why we remember and praise Newton and Tesla and not some John who got his wife Emma pregnant in poor medieval village? Give me at least one example when men in history were shamed for being virgins. how…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 02:08 PM
2

Subconscious pressure isn't the same as being pressured by society. As long as you (man or woman) were useful to society, no one cared about your sexual life. Up until sexual revolution you were more likely to be judged for having sexual life rather than the lack of. Celibacy was concidered a pious thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 11:49 AM
2

Did I say it's acceptable?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 11:45 AM
1

Back in old times no one cared about men's performance. As I said, it's a modern thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 11:40 AM
1

Shaming virgins is a modern thing,which developed as a response to slut-shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 08:51 AM
3

Chads have good looks to make up for whatever bad traits they have. Same with hot girls - they can afford to be bitchy and annoying.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/20 05:33 PM
5

Not always tho. Some hot women are born infertile.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 02:42 PM
19

Well men on ppd say they don't care about personality, so I guess that wasn't an issue if she was pretty. But doormats get what doormats are made for: to be stepped on. Simps of both gender pine after somebody who doesn't respect them and then whine on the internet about how bad men/women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/20 05:30 PM
33

He had a good reason to believe he deserved better than you, because you put up with his atrocious behaviour. If you dumped him the first time, he would have been humbled fast.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/20 08:56 AM
1

I'd be like my Chad father.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 08:43 PM
1

Please write more often on this sub))))
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 12:45 PM
3

Lol No children worked mostly on their family farm. You can still see it in third-world countries. And that's why back then children used to stay with fathers in case of divorce. Talk about men loving unconditionally))
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 12:22 PM
3

Children used to be a workforce from the age of 5. So yeah, it was worth it before.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 09:21 AM
3

Then why fathers are more likely to abandon their own children than women?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 08:09 AM
2

That's the advice you should give to yourself. Not everyone here is a desperate loser who can't get a normal partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 04:35 PM
4

More likely he will abuse, beat and degrade or even murder her for standing between him and his happiness with another wonan. It's beyond my understanding why men on ppd push total lack of dignity and self-respect as a voice of reason. You know what else can keep you from hunger and homelessness without sacrificing your dignity? A job.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 03:37 PM
3

Just hecause divorce was illegal doesn't mean marriage was better. What's the point of living with a man who is in love with another woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/20 09:13 AM
1

What of he's a decent man and a good father who one day just found a very attractive woman with whom he cheated on his wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 03:20 PM
2

If you got so much out of that marriage why are you so bitter? I doubt you worry about some woman's well-being so much it angers you that she's not dependant on her husband. So why?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 03:06 PM
10

Well then just don't commit to them. It's not like they can force you to commit. Why bother about whether or not those women own their decision? It's like being pissed about fast food restaurants, while you only eat healthy food.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 03:19 PM
0

Women and men judge beauty differently. I've seen absolutely plain women been called beautiful by men and I've seen men call Eva Green or Adriana Lima not so beautiful, even plain. Also women don't understand why go for someone who is worse than your SO? And when a man cheats on someone who is uglier it either makes he think she's even uglier or feel deep humiliation that she lost to someone who is worse. The gender differences in the work.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 08:14 PM
2

Yeah, obviously. For a biological reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 01:22 PM
5

Sexual dimorphism anyone? Short height is neotenic therefore attractive in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 10:53 AM
8

Cooking, cleaning and giving birth is masculine. By your definition the perfect feminine woman is a gold-digger, who does nothing aside from being sweet and beautiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 04:02 PM
1

I agree with you. But it's interesting how people differ in what they consider feminine or masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 07:15 PM
5

It's because they know what men are conscious about. To be good at insulting you need to have an empathy, to be able to put yourself in the shoes of another person. You don't use as insult something you yourself hate in the person, you use what the person hates in himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 02:29 PM
2

In a neighbor post a man said that neediness is feminine and therefore attractive in women. Guess what one man considers feminine another man finds annoying.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 02:24 PM
3

There are already sperm banks. Just like there egg banks. You have nothing to offer to those women, unless you can somehow make top-tier men be willing to commit to them. You want to force some people to make happier others, while I choose freedom for all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 10:04 PM
7

I'm giving you example of a country, where that doesn't exist. And women still chose to work, not beg low-tier men for relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 10:01 PM
2

If some men doesn't to give me his money for free, why shouldn't he starve to death? That's how your logic sounds. You can decide what to do with your dick, but not what to do with someone else's genitals. How hard it is to understand? Just because premarital sex is outlawed, you won't suddenly become desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 09:59 PM
3

It won't suit me better. It's what would suit better him and you, since you're the one worried about some incel going betserk over not getting a pussy. As for me, I'd rather take a risk of being the victim of incel terrorism than have relationship with undesirable men. If freedom may cost my life than be it. Would you like it if I said women should get their eggs removed, just because it suited me? No probably not If women went RE over not fertilized eggs and started murdering people, then yeah,…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 09:55 PM
5

Hell, girls have so many daddy issues they could be a complete fucking loser at age 35 and fuck a 20 year old girl. We all know girls in their early twenties dating 30 and 40 year old men. Young girls are always dating up in age. In other words the problem of male sexlessness is just a matter of time? Incels just need to wait till they're 30 to get their prime girlfriends. those kids are more likely to be failures in life and end up in jail. At least they will be successful with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 09:50 PM
7

getting rid of employment quotas and divorce court would put most women on the street, sucking dick for a sandwich. I live in a country without employment quotas and as for divorce laws, everything you had before your marriage is yours and no one will take it from you. That being said, I don't remember ever seeing women dying of hunger on the streets. Women work here. What else can be done to encourage women to have sex with men they don't desire?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 09:44 PM
2

Although I do find that remark kind of ironic given this thread. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 09:32 PM
4

Those men don't even get married. What difference does it make? Women chose to die virgins. It just proves that you're not looking for solutions, you just want to punish women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 09:23 PM
5

There are countries where premarital sex is outlawed and women still choose to be single than with men they don't desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 09:14 PM
8

No, I say jail them after they commit crime, not before it. If we can't get every women a man she desires, why should we get every man a women he desires? If men are that dangerous simply by not having sex, then maybe they should choose testosterone-suppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 09:04 PM
7

Agreed. But when guys go full RE and people ask why fucked up shit like that happens and how it can be prevented. The answer will still be the same. If women were going RE over not getting commitment from Chads, what would you do to prevent it? Some things are just impossible to prevent without oppressing someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 08:48 PM
3

Nope. Grew up and live in a non-feminist country and most of young girls around me prefered guys their age. The only girls who wanted to marry (not date, marry) an older man were girls who wanted to be pampered. They even called it, 'He will treat me like a daughter'. They didn't desire those men, but wanted the benefits of their commitment. Of course, there are older men who are hot and desired, but they're hot despite their age, not because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/20 12:44 PM
1

Because only hot men can afford not to dress well. It will make them look worse, but not fatally. But if you need an advice from women on how to get a gf, then you will be way better off by dressing stylishly. Isn't it obvious?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/20 03:57 AM
2

This post is good example why women don't settle young. It's not as good of a deal as TRP makes it look.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/20 11:04 PM
4

Women are different. I always like men my age. Once I fell in love with a men I met online. He was 12 years older. Like everything about him was perfect in my opinion, except for his age. It didn't work simply because of his age. Now as get closer to 30, I realize that I still consider men aged 20-25 the best looking. That's why I don't blame men for preferring younger women. Nothing compares to youth.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/20 03:58 AM
1

That and crushes, chemistry, lust, butterflies, soul mate, passion, unconditional love and sex. Yeah, and that's what can be wrapped up into 'being good enough to fuck on the spot'. Also, no one is loved unconditionally. Hot people are loved for giving experience no one else can. Nice try reducing the importance to just instantly fuckable. I'm trying to explain the importance of asking the right questions to get the right answers. Also settling for the stable, loyal provider after having fun wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 09:43 PM
3

Yeah, because looks are not the most important thing when it comes to relationship. How often do you see man being married to a less attractive woman? Women lower their standards when they want relationship or marriage. What you should ask those women is "what qualities would make you fuck the guy on the spot" and you will get the answer you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 09:27 PM
4

Girls know it from the beginning, because we pay attention. Do you really think mothers every morning from age 5 give us instructions on how to attract men? I learned it by seeing how boys in kindergarten pine after the same girl. There a lot of men who grew up to be successful with women simply because they didn't have their sight blinded by sour grapes. Observant people learn how to survive, egocentric people grow up to be undesired and angry be it men or women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 08:55 PM
3

I have a feeling they were pampered far too much. It shocks me how dense and egocentric they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 08:12 PM
6

Were you blind? I mean, no matter what adults say, children tend to question it and take notes on how people actually act. Any child can see that boys tend to like pretty girls, and girls like handsome boys. You have to be either insanely unobservant or absolutely lack empathy to not realize that. I as a little girl was told that the most important thing is to be kind and that will make people like me. But I soon realized that being kind is just a bare minimum of being a decent human being, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/20 05:06 PM
4

You can't give her what a Chad can. Just like an average woman can't give a man what a Stacy can. Hot people are genetically superior, they get special treatment because they deserve it. Otherwise, there would be no difference in treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/20 02:34 PM
1

It's because of higher lever of testosterone, honey, not because you're so pure and innocent.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/20 06:12 PM
2

But if ANY shaming stings, it's probably because you don't feel too good about what you've done ;D If it's some really rich, hot and young man who doesn't want to marry a slut, then of course she's gonna regret her past lol. Not because she regrets being a slut, but because it's now in the way of getting the best man available.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 05:36 PM
5

I can't blame them, but I'm trying to explain that women view it as slut-shaming, because they're deemed unworthy of commitment because of it. Slut-shamming is not strictly about verbal insults.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 06:10 AM
5

Women don't care about the value men place on hooking up. If most men don't want to marry a slut that's a slut-shaming in women's eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/20 05:10 AM
1

But the better the lock the more keys you have to try on it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/20 02:25 PM
2

I still think it was both. Even 10 y.o. kids couldn't believe I was 14 back then. But in my eyes I was all grown up! The guy was my classmate, but looked older.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 08:24 PM
17

Damn, you just described the 15 y.o. me. Had a crush on a guy in school. Total Chad. He knew about my feelings and rightfully ignored me, probably because at 14 I looked more like a 12 y.o. child. Then puberty hit me like a wrecking ball and the right genes finally kicked in. The shift in male attention was shocking. But when my crush asked to date him, I declined. I realize that he was right to reject me, because he had a better options, but the damage was done.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 05:36 PM
1

Women can find masculine men who aren't bedridden. And bedridden men (and women) are the closest thing to a child and it's as far from masculinity as it can get. I'm sorry you had to go through that. And the lack of compassionate person at your side must have made it even worse. The fact, that your gf expected you to comfort her in that situation, is almost angering. I think some women are just extremely infantile.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 12:01 PM
1

It's always surprising to read that, because statistically women are more likely to stick with their sick husbands, while men are more likely to leave. Damn, men are more likely to leave his family if his own child is sick, and start a new family. Some say women leave if they see a tiny bit of vulnerability in their men. Others say women care for their bedridden husbands. Are those just two different groups of women? If so, what makes some men chose the first group, and others to choose the seco…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 10:58 AM
1

How do you you know the exact number of your wife's n-count? Does her vagina has a dick-counter?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 10:46 AM
2

They're from Caucasus, some of them are religious, some are not, but women are supposed to remain virgins till marriage. Men usually aren't held to that standard, but there are a lot of religious men as well, who choose not to have extramarital sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 11:27 PM
4

A rare breed indeed, but not non-existent.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 10:46 PM
20

People usually prefer partners with n-count that's close to theirs. I have a virgin friend from a very traditionalist background, who only dates virgin Chads. Her reasoning? "If I can't have sex, then he shouldn't either. A manwhore doesn't deserve a virging bride".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/20 08:46 PM
1

Fair enough. Except, just because most women live longer than men doesn't mean all women live longer than men. There are will still be men who depend on taxpayers for support. As for the rest of your comment, I mostly agree. Hopefully you'll head that way, it would be interesting to see where it leads.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 10:20 PM
1

No one said women should not have careers, but it's wrong for legislation to force companies to hire back women after an extended leave due to a choice that they made that prioritized family (ie. getting pregnant). I believe that's what Japan did, and their demography plunged. If you want women of your society to keep making babies to become future taxpayers, who will support you in old age, then you'll have to make sure women don't have to choose career over giving birth.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 11:13 AM
15

How can she say no to taking dicks if she has infact gotten tattoos and piercings? This is the funniest thing I've ever heard lol Why not go further? How can she say no to dicks, of she dyes her hair/ wears make up/ drinks milkshake? A lot of women just plainly like tattoos and piercings, how hard is it to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 01:03 PM
3

Why are you mad?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 10:00 AM
3

I'm shallow. Never hid it. I just don't consider it a bad thing. It's natural for women to be attracted to hot men. It's natural for men to be attracted to young women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 09:46 AM
4

Personality matters in a dangerous reality. Good warrior is more attractive than cowardly hot guy. But in a safer world, looks win over anything else. Little girls learn early that boys go after prettiest girls even if they're evil. No ugly girl was loved by boys because of her personality. What do girls do then? They do their best to be as beautiful as they can. At least it was that way before fat acceptance movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 09:29 AM
0

So... whining that men don't like honesty is just... silly to my thinking. Imagine being portrayed evil for bot being honest and being portrayed evil for being honest. What women are supposed to do? When we try to be tactful, we're called deceitful. So here's a question, what's a man's idea of tact? How do you tactfully say you're attracted to tall men for example?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 09:15 AM
2

Women say, “Where are all the real men who approach women?” Implying men who don’t aren’t actually men. Just tell those women that real men are with real women. I'm not going to side with women who think they're a entitled to relationship. Both men and women should stop bothering about being called losers. Lol. Women whine about being called cat ladies all the time. No they don't. Otherwise they wouldn't keep calling themselves catladies. Cats>>> bad relationship. If I see a single woman, I just…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 08:37 AM
1

I did. I didn't like him, but he asked for a chance. I gave it a chance, but there simply was no chemistry between us. I politely said "we're different", but he didn't want to hear it. I explained that I'm just not in love with him, and I can't have relationship with someone I do not love, and that I hope he will find someone who is better than me and will love him dearly. Didn't go well. He became enraged and said no one will love me as he did and I'll get in relationship with some brute who wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 08:26 AM
3

How many cases or boyfriends murdering a competitor for every case of men murdering woman over rejection there are? You don’t see us petrified about it. Testosterone is a hell of a drug. We either approach or get labeled failures. No one's labeling you an failure for not approaching someone. No one goes "See that man over there, I never see him approaching women. What a loser". That just doesn't happen outside your Fantasyland. And btw women get called losers by men for not being in relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 08:06 AM
7

Not just insecure, she lacks deep insight. Women are bad no matter what they do, how hard is it to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 07:50 AM
5

Should she take chances? Men avoid getting married to not risk their money, but god forbid a woman lies to not risk her life
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/20 07:44 AM
2

That's an 'it's not you it's me' argument. Being tall is just more masculine.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 06:27 PM
5

Do you appreciate post-wall single mothers?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 03:54 PM
14

Thank you. I hate it when people forget why Winston hated women in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/20 01:06 PM
1

It's not like I'm making money off it to fight over it. I shared my opinion, you shared yours, which I consider interesting even if I do not share it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 07:19 PM
1

Well I'm still standing by my premise. Since the term of settling can't be scientifically measured, its just a matter of opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 07:10 PM
1

I didn't say you should care. I was just stating a tendency.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 06:59 PM
1

Most men on ppd consider it settling and hypocrisy. I consider anything that isn't what a person wanted and theoretically could have but chose to lower their standards for whatever reason as settling. I just think there are different levels of settling ranging from good to bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 06:10 PM
2

If a woman liked only top-20% guys when she was younger and then matured and decided that average guys are good to and will make a better father for her future children and only then she finds a guy who fits this description than its just shifting standards and not settling by your definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 05:46 PM
1

Now you're contradicting yourself: Settling would be based on my current standard, not previous past standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 05:09 PM
3

Good points. But then it makes the whole AF/BB pointless. If the woman wanted hot guy when she was young and had sex with hot young guys, but now in 30s she wants to marry and average guy, would you say her standards have shifted naturally? As a young woman she was worth more than average guy and it was realistic to want a hotter man, but in her 30s her worth is closer to average man's. And she actually likes that average man. Is she settling or did her standards just shift?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 04:48 PM
7

Because you WANTED a pornstar, not a typical girl, but either came to conclusion that you can't afford the former or whatever reason else that made you to lower your standard. But is marrying a pornstar that unrealistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 04:21 PM
2

Should have ditched her soldier-boyfriend and married someone else, that way men would have a chance to use it as an example of women lacking loyalty. Imagine going down in history as an idiot that became post-wall and was ditched for being too loyal to a man who married an enemy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 01:47 PM
5

It's not bad when a man does it. She probably was ugly and hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 12:54 PM
4

How exactly it destroyed civilizations?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 12:51 PM
22

Same. That's why I don't understand shaming people who chose to remain single. No relationship > bad relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 12:23 PM
13

How do you think dropping standards work? Lol Dropping standards IS settling. Some settle at 18, others settle at 30. But it's still settling. Some fall in love and are forced to choose between the love and their standards. Women can fall in love and still consider the man not enough overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 11:37 AM
4

Aaand that's why hypergamy is a good thing, kids. If your only value in your looks and youth better waste it on the best looking man.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 09:29 AM
1

Do you think average men deserve the same treatment in relationship as top-20% men? Would you expect your gf/wife to treat you the same way as she treated her hot ex? It's a theoretical question, so you don't have to tell you don't do ltr or marriage thing. Just pretend
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 08:31 AM
27

The other day men of ppd shared a wish that women drop their high standards and settle for looksmatch earlier not in 30s. But now settling is evil too. So which is worse? Spinsterhood or settling?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 08:27 AM
2

I find funny men funny and attractive men attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 08:53 AM
42

Because they don't want women to choose singlehood over relationship. They want a chance to reject you as in "You didn't want me in my youth now I don't want to share with my resources". Then they want you to whine about "where all the good men gone" on social media, so they can post it on mgtow/trp subs and laugh.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 04:38 PM
1

Stop encouraging women to pursue careers in their prime ages, instead encourage them to settle down first by 24-27 and then choose career opportunities/development later. What if the husbands dies or leaves because he found a younger wife? Will the government support her and her children? Why would the company choose to hire a 30 year old married woman with no experience and who is likely to have a child and missed out on work?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/20 12:47 PM
3

Do you hate men? I don't have reasons to hate men, on the contrary I like them. Go look around the Net. 14-17 year old girls with older man fetishes Of course, they do exist, and it's called a fetish for a reason. Fetish is not a norm, the norm is the opposite, because youth=healthy offspring. What is the age of consent where you live? I don't do fucked up bullshit like that. I know how to act around girls and women. Not only are those men creepy but they have terrible Game. I'm glad you told th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 09:41 AM
5

Looks is one thing, but trying to hit on a teen when she says she's not interested is another thing. And trust me older men go from looks to action really quick. I lost count of how many times I had to go from polite "thanks, but no" to "fuck off". You don't even listen your own words, you're annoyed that 12 year old girls hate attention from old men, but then proceeds to say that young girls actually do find older men attractive. The 15 year old girl that wanted to fuck you and your 17 y.o. gir…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 08:46 AM
2

Why do you think young girls (12-17 y.o) must not be disgusted by older men? I was taught that 'men only want one thing' and that's exactly why I hated older men flirting with me and because older equals unattractive too. Why don't you think that it's in a young girl's nature to be disgusted by unwanted attention? In the end, if women only want top 10% men, then any other man is a threat to her goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 07:20 AM
1

But it has little to do with behavior of human beings as a group, at least, to my limited knowledge on the subject. There literally men who doesn't consider their attractive wives (damn, my cousin is married to a girl who could make VS models feel ugly) simply because they just don't fit into "whore" category. They love their "innocent" wives, respect them, but do not desire them. Wives are for children, whores are for sex - that's how they see the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/20 07:19 AM
3

Just say it out loud: women are always wrong. Damned if they do, damned if they don't))
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 09:50 PM
1

It's not that the man can't get his dick up, it's that the sex with safe woman is a chore just like it's a chore for a woman to have sex with undesirable husbands. Madonna-whore is more common in patriarchal societies, where a woman's sexuality is demonized: you're either a wife or a whore. Wrote an anecdotal example of my personal experience with this complex, but then remembered there no reason for anyone to believe it. So I'll say you this: I don't know how common it is for American psycholog…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 09:45 PM
2

You're wrong. I've seen men who have beautiful wives but they're not turned on by them, because those women are ..too safe? Those women were loved and respected but not desired by their husbands. Maybe it's hard to believe for Americans but here in Russia it's not so uncommon.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 08:49 PM
3

I am the most shallow person I know. For real.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 04:50 PM
6

Because historically women put up with a lot of shit and stuck in shitty marriage because they couldn't support themselves and their children. I value career, because I want my potential children to have the best life they can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/20 04:36 PM
6

I love ppd. One day it's a 'I as a man want debt-free lily-pure wife without tattoos, because I want to be the only man she ever experienced sex with' and another day it's a 'what's wrong with women and wanting to feel special? Is it some evolution thing or what?! Must be some hypergamy solipsistic hamster stuff'.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/20 09:10 PM
25

162% stronger Stronger than who? Women seek men who are stronger than other men, not her. She needs a man who will protect her from other men, not beat her. As someone already said, women are comparing men to other men, not to themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/20 10:55 AM
2

Boy, you really don't understand how attraction works, do you? In other words you want me to have sex with the man I don't want to have sex. And I keep raping myself with this dude in hope of some other woman having sex with my son out of pity? That doesn't make sense. Or do you think having sex will automatically make woman attracted to man? That's not how it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 10:19 PM
2

If women recognise this imbalance of power, they can, at least, attempt to change. I realize it. Just like most women do. But how is it going to make women attracted to men they do not find attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 09:00 PM
2

My moral compass tells me not to force people into relationship, be it men or women. How is it different from rape? Hitler murdered people, while I just want people to have freedom of choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 08:30 PM
1

Women want what comes with powerful men, they think of other men when they are with them. Dictators are what happens when incels gain power. Chads are more democratic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 07:04 PM
2

That's up to you to decide.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 07:02 PM
11

Same. I'd rather pay than feel indebted. Since we're just getting to know each other, I believe we owe nothing each other. And the guy doesn't feel used for his money. It's a best way to test whether you actually like him or just being Pavloved.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 04:24 PM
1

Got it. You're just a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 02:53 PM
1

Do you mean a person is to be blamed for even getting in relationship with toxic person? May I ask what's your opinion on divorce laws? Do you believe that man who got half of their assets taken away from them deserve it because they should have known better and therefore no man should be opening their mouth to say how unfair it is? Do you also believe that Johnny Depp got what he deserved because he should have known better than to get in relationship with Heard? In other world, MGTOWs and RPs …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/20 02:40 PM
3

Exactly. I'm trying to make him realise that OP has a point here. We judge women hurshy, yet we see more beautiful women than men. So maybe there are really less attractive men and more attractive women overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 08:53 PM
6

OP said that she sees a lot of beautiful women, but not men. If women are so harsh to judge why do they still see more beautiful women than men?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 06:25 PM
1

Dictators are usually ugly af. More like 'there are your poor incels'.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 05:48 PM
2

how about we get rid of ugly women. You can. Just stop having children with ugly women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 05:46 PM
2

Why do not women judge other women as harshly as they judge men?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 05:30 PM
4

Man on PPD: "Stop chasing Chad and date a nice beta male!!!". Also man: "Oh, you just found a beta male. Wait till you regret it".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/20 03:34 AM
0

Best comment
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 02:17 PM
6

How can I find that comment? I bet it was a fun read. Apparently wanting someone educated, intelligent and ambitious etc. is fine until you also start saying they must be good looking too. Men always say they want honesty from women on what actually attracts them. Then as soon as women say they're attracted to physical characters, they start to hate/shame them for it. Apparently only men get to be attracted to beauty and youth, because mah biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 01:37 PM
8

female friends who are 5'2 referring to 5'10 men as "too short for them" How is that different from 40 y.o. men saying 30 y.o. women are too old for them? Whatever happened to 'it's just biology'?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 11:46 AM
1

Women want the man they're already attracted to to express his feelings aka tell her that he loves her. Even if she's in a relationship with a man but her attraction to him is fading, him talking about the feelings will do more harm than good. Same can be said about men. Not much difference tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 11:40 AM
5

Same. There are more beautiful women than beautiful men. A really handsome man is a rarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/19 01:17 PM
1

Of course they wanted sex before they learned what the sex is for. That's why we have instincts in the first place. God, the sheer lack of knowledge of basic biology in this sub is crazy!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 03:57 PM
1

Dude, you suck at Biology
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 03:50 PM
2

Exactly. I thought that's the reason Asian girls tend to make their mouths look smaller.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 06:06 PM
13

Babys' eyebrows are usually low though: https://www.ralphlauren.com/on/demandware.static/-/Sites-RalphLauren_US-Library/default/dw8159c7e0/images/baby/feature/babys-first-test/20160803_baby_feat_c01.jpeg https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0862/4806/products/Pink_Monogrammed_Dress_Gentry_CA_6_1024x1024.jpg?v=1483832522
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 12:36 PM
2

Because your lizard brain doesn't understand how birth-control works. What men actually don't understand is female arousal, not hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/19 04:41 PM
2

TIL I was a man all this time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 08:56 PM
2

Interesting food for thought. Thank you!
/r/BlackPillScience20/04/19 09:55 AM
9

So you mean when a woman has a personality issues she gets cats, and when a man has personality issues he shouts up a bunch of people? Seems like loneliness is far worse for men than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 08:55 AM
1

You do realise that what you call a smart choice is more often than not just marrying a good guy she's not attracted to?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 08:45 AM
1

In that case shouldn't men be grateful that those women have chosen a single life instead of making some poor guy a beta bux? Or perhaps it's just a projecting. That single life men talk as of a luxury in fact may be not so satisfying?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 08:35 AM
14

Almost everyone has a personality issues nowadays. Men, women, hot 19 y.o. girls, successful rich guys, etc. People need to stop using that lazy argument about women over 30 suddenly developing psychological issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 08:25 AM
6

Single motherhood is indeed bad. But what are the options? Do not have children at all? Because even a married woman can end up being a single mother. But then again, society hates on child-free women over 30 as well, especially the menospher. Women just can't win)))
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 01:04 PM
1

Thank you, guys. That's an interesting insight.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 06:46 PM
3

Does anyone know, is there a similar research and data on women and estrogen?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 11:24 AM
8

I guess my first redpill moment was when I came to conclusion that a man's romantic love at best lasts as long as woman's youth. Everything after is just an attachment. That made me believe that men aren't capable of real long-lasting love. So I was about 14 when I realized how limited my time and ability to attract male affection are. I can't say this mindset affected my life in a positive way tbh. And coming across TRP statement that women are realists pretending to be romantics who aren't cap…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 03:55 PM
1

The MGTOW movement doesn't need to attract the majority of people to have an positive impact on society. I actually think it's the healthiest reaction to mistreatment and it has a real potential to become a wakeup call for women, if that's what you want. Incels are begging for attention, TRPs are demanding it, but MGTOW if done correctly are really just going their own way. It's a good way of making a statement without attacking anybody all the while maintaining self-respect. It will hardly go u…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 11:01 AM
2

How in the world can a daughter cuck you?! Why are you the way you are, Americans? It's either women fetishizing fathers by calling their boyfriends 'daddy', or men being resentful that they can't fuck their daughters smh
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 01:18 PM
1

I don't see how intentionally choosing guaranteed failure is better than a risky chance of success. How is that even an option? Not necessarily a failure. It's not like 90% of those women end up alone. Lots of them still find a man to marry. And even of they don't marry it's not like they can't find a company of men. Once they're old they're undesirable either way married or not. The truth is, you can read most of a person's character very naturally by simply paying attention to them with a crit…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/19 11:22 AM
5

The thing is lowering standards doesn't make her happy in the end. What is the point of marrying or being in relationship with someone who doesn't attract her in the way she wants it. Would you as a man like to be with a woman who isn't attracted to you? Do you want to be someone a woman settled for?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 10:57 PM
1

But is it all worth it? She spends her prime years on one man who is not in his prime, and risks to be cheated on or divorced once she loses her youth and beauty. What makes it better than riding cc strategy? In the worst case scenario she either spends her youth on one man and then gets dumped or spends it on variety of Chads and gets dumped. Shitty men exist Love this advice. Maybe TRP should invest in writing a manual on predicting a man's action in 20 years advance? Share you wisdom lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 10:49 PM
2

Plastic surgery The Destroyer of Wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 09:27 PM
2

I would have value just because I exist. That is something good no matter how you look at it. The grass is always greener on the other side. You forget that it's not out of love for women their lives were valuable throughout of time, it's because of one thing women can do - give a birth. One man can substitute another man in that process, but one one can not give a birth to another woman's child. And women who couldn't give birth used to lose their value really fast. That so called value made wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 06:00 PM
2

Of course not. They are not the same person. Men love women for what they are. It is something quite personal and it depends on the individual. Well the same can be applied to anyone. There are women who love their husbands even if they're ugly and crippled. I grew up in a country where something like this is common. A hot one can be loved for his good looks, an ugly one for his wits) Theoretically, there's something to love in anyone. But if we really loved someone unconditionally we would be o…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 05:14 PM
15

Everyone loves conditionally. TRP needs to grow up. If men's love was unconditional the 'wall' wouldn't exist. Loving women for what they are (yound and beautiful) is same as women loving tall men. Women can control their age no more than men can control their height. Loving someone for what he or she is ain't noble.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 04:41 PM
6

"Men tend to love women for what they are. (Beautiful/young/attractive/charming etc. You know... things a person is)" Women can love a man for what he is too - he just need to have good looks. But then men whine about women being shallow and only wanting Chads. No man is going to love a lazy hot 10/10 girl and a lazy 3/10 girl for the same reason. One will be loved for what she is, the other - for what she does.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 04:34 PM
21

Honestly, I've seen more women sticking with sick or crippled husband that men doing the same for their wives. I'd say, maybe it's more about sex/relationship market supply than gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/19 04:28 PM
1

They are not. At least for me. Most of the guys I've dated were younger than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/19 10:14 AM
1

That's exactly what he should do)))) Anyway, sorry for the typo, guys))
/r/MensRights23/09/18 12:36 PM
22

God, what a sorry excuse for a human being she is. Can he sew her?
/r/MensRights23/09/18 10:06 AM
11

"The misery comes later, when they lose their youth and the world starts treating them like it treats men. They are unprepared for what men experience their entire lives." Even after hitting the wall, their lives are probably still much better than lives of women in traditional societies.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 11:35 AM
1

You think so? I'd say it depends on the person and the diet. Some look hot (like singer Valeria), some - not). BTW women of ethnicity in your opinion age the best?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/18 05:15 PM
3

Tbh all the cat ladies I know were really hot and popular when they were young. I'll tell you more. The far-from-pretty girls from my school got married year after graduation, but the hot ones are still not married, and enjoying their lives. Ugly girls tend to say "yes" more often than "no". But then again, may be it's just a Russian thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/18 10:41 AM
1

She's been with him for years and mothered his son. That's one long-lasting candy)))
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 03:16 PM
5

Talking about Trump, there's one thing that bothers me. RP consider Trump an alpha-male. I'm no gynecologist but I doubt Melania was a virgin or had low n-count, when she married him. So, judging by RP logic, doesn't that make Trump a beta bux?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/17 12:39 PM
5

Yet they cheat even on a Grace Kelly-level beauties if given a chance. So no, it's not entirely a female domain.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 05:12 PM
5

That's horrible...
/r/MensRights01/02/17 04:13 AM
3

Beautiful child)
/r/MensRights27/01/17 05:45 AM
1

Can't you enjoy life while having your options open? I don't judge mgtow. I think it's totally okay, if they they really don't want relationship with women. But if a person does it because he has no other choice, then things are not ok. God, are standards for men are THAT high in usa? How do you think, what's an average guy's idea for a potential girlfriend is? P.S. "Thanks for sharing that tale" - did I sense sarcasm here?)) I'm not american, that's why I'm asking. I thought "tale" is something…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 09:35 AM
4

Nah, feminists still want to have relationship with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 09:03 AM
7

That's right, no one is perfect. I think girls, whose mother or any other female relative got dumped for someone younger, tend to think so. I'll talk from personal experience. When I was 17, my friends and I used to ask each other relationship question. "Would you rather marry someone who is your age or someone who is older?" Most of the girls wanted to marry someone who is older. My motivation to marry someone who is my age was, that he will have fit body and that will make him attractive. Then…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 09:00 AM
8

Ugly rich dude is dating hot yound woman? Well, nothing new here. If you were in his shoes, would you rather date a funny math professor or a hot young model? Do you know how many examples of "beautiful girl meets a nice boy, but 20 years later he becomes rich and dumps her for a young beautiful lady" there are? Does that mean women should become WGTOW? Or should they only date rich guys, so when men dump them, they're at least financially settled for life? I'm asking sincerely.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/16 07:41 AM
3

Some women confuse arrogance with confidence, I suppose. And confidence as we all know is something we are all attracted to. But your statement is a female version of a "men don't like bitches, but are willing to put up with bitchiness of a beautiful woman".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 12:18 AM
1

Looks matter. It's just not enough. Source: I live in a country, where ugly guy has every chance to marry a hot girl. Yes, even if he isn't rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/16 07:56 AM
4

Maintaining good skin is based on: 1) Sun protection 2) Exfoliation (shaving is men's version of exfoliating) 3) Moisturizing No less important are: 1) Healthy diet 2) No alcohol 3) No smoking Source: dermatology books, experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 07:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter