TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Citizen_Bongo Archive

View 2 posts and 126 comments by Citizen_Bongo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
263

She needs to be chipped. Guys could opt to get thier dicks chipped and if you put it near her, a false-rape alarm sounds..
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/17 02:10 AM
1

Most stupid Asian person I ever heard. No wonder she turned out like that.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/17 09:05 PM
2

It's like punching out a child too far.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/17 08:52 PM
12

Yeah looks like he started getting physical at least from where it's recoreded.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/17 08:43 PM
1

With these things come trade offs, increased docility make come with the benefit of being less violent. Our reduced physical endurance may come with the benefit of more energy to the brain, which uses a huge amount of energy compared to our primate ancestors. Enhanced long-term planning is a benefit. You seemed to have missed much of the beneficial adaptations. People have been staved in Malthusian catastrophes, killed by disease, warfare, executions and barbaric punishments. All of which have s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 08:18 PM
1

Look up population geneticist and Anthropologist Henry Harpending, and the 10,000 year explosion: how civilization accelerated human evolution. An evolutionary explosion in response to the huge changes in selective pressures that dramatic changes in society brought with it. Anglo Saxon culture was at one point ruled by bloodthirsty barbaric tribes that were constantly at war. Goths, Visigoths, Gauls, etc. The Germanic tribes we're similar to those groups sure, that was how Anglo-Saxon culture wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 03:04 PM
1

My point is those are skills a leader may require. We don't want weak leaders. Ok. That's not totally contradictory or anything. When I'm saying we are literally bred to follow our leaders, where do you get from that that I'm saying it's entirely cultural? What I'm saying it that over thousands of years culture affects our genetics just as genetics affects our culture. I'm obviously not saying that there was no social structure, I'm saying that more organization means greater control over the gr…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 02:18 PM
1

You couldn't give an uncivilized human a desk job either. You could give them a sledge hammer on a demolition job though, but what does that and their not being able to type prove? Why would anyone follow Hitler, or Putin, or Genghis Khan Ironically a huge part of the reason people fight, die and kill for such rulers is a sense of altruism, a love for their own. Thus out groups who are perceived as threatening their own must die. Bullies We started off talking about wolves, well look at omega wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:12 PM
1

zero compassion or empathy. Exactly and empathy is from our primitive brain, it's not derived from cold hard reason and why would it be. On the other hand we can't give an ape a desk job and expect them to fit right in. If people are raised in a stable loving family they rarely ever become rapists and murders when their not "just following orders". It's generally damaged minds, created by accident of birth or emotional abuse that become this way. A kid left alone in the wilderness would grow int…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 09:11 PM
1

All I'm saying is the people responsible for the vast majority of deaths are psudo-intellectual bureaucrats and politicians not cave men. Our lizard brains have not caught up to culture. If they had they would be no racism, violence, or rape. I don't know who's to say what our instincts would be.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 08:37 PM
1

The leading wolfs are the breeding pair the rest are their offspring, I don't know about how much respect wolves are going to have for each other. I doubt their going to go all Oedipus take out their father and mate with their mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 08:08 PM
1

I'm pretty much dyslexic. Experience in hunting and defending territory directly relates to experience in being dominant. Wolves bite each other as well as hunted prey. In the wild "Alpha wolves" do not fight to gain their position, arguably making alpha an inaccurate term.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 05:29 PM
1

Society has been set back thousands of years by alpha assholes who have killed much more intelligent people than them because they were insane and violent. Really? If we look at many packs of animals like wolfs for example it's not the strongest, biggest, most violent, wolf in the pack. But the eldest male the one with the most experience in hunting, defending territory. If we look at human society we long progressed from having a physical strength determine decision makers. A huge amount of tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 11:07 AM
2

What I'm taking about is being charismatic, friendly and honest. Gaining someone's respect and trust, building a mutually beneficial relationship with them. I would not characterise that as manipulation, simply because you happen to be getting what you want from someone via in part your actions. If the interaction's been honest from the start it's only manipulation if you deny agency to the other party. Don't get butthurt maybe you're not her type, maybe you need to work on your people skills, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 12:35 PM
1

If I got butthurt Yeah there's obviously a scale, but ultimately there is good reason to want to be liked. There's a difference between manipulating people Maybe I was a bit blunt with my language but I didn't really have that in mind when I mentioned obtaining what you desire. It could be perfectly innocent desires of friendship and meaningful relationships. What I'm talking about is winning friends and influencing people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 11:48 AM
1

I don't know I've gone out with some girls who could be total bitches but really looked after me when I was sick. I see friends partners do the same for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 09:39 AM
1

How long were you together though? Was this really a committed relationship? How severe was the illness?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 09:16 AM
1

Also, haven't you ever seen an ugly woman with a guy who could honestly do better? Yeah got a friend, good looking, tall, guy's well into weightlifting and fitnesses too. The girls he dated I would not even have considered... It's all about self esteem, maybe he's got a fat fetish too though? Guaranteed she's playing his emotions like a fiddle. The girls were actually really nice, he was the one messing them around. Told us one girl wasn't his girlfriend and she was nuts for thinking so, turned …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 07:50 AM
1

Do they not also have a frustration in that they cannot effectively exert their will on others? It's rational to care to a degree about what others think of you, it allows or prevents you from getting that which you desire from others, new acquaintances or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 07:00 AM
1

Where I'm from pretty much everyone male and female accepts divorce procedure is stacked against men. Most would like to see change but that's not politicians want. I think a lot of people who aren't MRA's pr have even heard of them have some overlap.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 06:40 AM
2

If women suck at those things, and you just said you were awesome at science doesn't that set you apart? He's the thing women suck at maths. Sounds harsh? Well so do most men, since you did so well at science in college you'll have surpassed most of them in the field of science by far... Even if a stereotype's true you aren't limited by your gender but your personal aptitude, and the effort you put in. Are women inferior men? No they're not the same as men. Are men inferior men? Most of them yes…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 11:27 PM
3

He I'm not American if someone says they don't believe in evolution here they may as well be shouting "I'm retarded". Darwin's on our money, people will think your shit's all fucked up. The only time evolution is dirty word here is when you imply it hasn't stopped within say 40,00 to the last 10,000 years and there could be any difference between populations. RIP Henry Harpending
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 10:31 PM
1

Interesting "true love", is the model that came after match makers, chaperones and such courtship rituals ended. Again it depends on what you mean by "true love", I agreed with what that article linked with said about love being overly idealised.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 10:25 PM
1

I did read the side bar, but as you say apparently it's a big freewheeling view of male and female nature and sexual dynamics Since I was looking for it to be summed up and defined in a paragraph, I didn't find it my answer. Ultimately isn't it men in society in which patriarchy no longer exists outside the minds of feminists. After such a social shift wondering what works now the rules have changed?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 10:02 PM
1

The one is your true love, and soul mate. By virtue of being compatible and the person you do indeed take as your partner for life. And yeah, man I hate the phrase soul mate, cause I hate it when people talk like fannies. this challenges the concept of the one... Well if you define the one as predestined sure. I think you're right lots of people have an unhealthy romanticised view of love, but only real idiots believe in destiny right? Or are you saying that people may almost accept this unconsc…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 09:48 PM
2

Is that what we really want in our relationships? In all honesty in my experience even the worst partners of I've had nurturing when I was ill or in some other capacity. But does anyone want a partner to be completely dependent on them for care and nurturance? I don't think anyone should want that it's not rational to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 09:39 PM
2

That they don't care about looks. That they want to date someone in their league. I mean you'd hope they did for the sake of the gene pool. I look at things from an evolutionary perspective so I see the logic in some of these things but then I definitely have disagreements. But I'd also say they were the nurturing gender, in terms of childcare, nursing, they are incredibly drawn to these fields and others like counselling. The mistake is thinking that nurturing means being completely selfless, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 09:23 PM
1

It seems like such a loose ideology, if it can really be called that though, I mean it could encompass so many different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:39 PM
2

So there is no one red pill, OK that explains why I was having trouble looking for what essentially isn't there. A truth all red pillers held in common.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:29 PM
2

I did before I came here I still couldn't say succinctly what exactly it was. Feminism is a sexual strategy. It puts women into the best position they can find, to select mates, to determine when they want to switch mates, to locate the best dna possible, and to garner the most resources they can individually achieve. Is this it? It seems like the red pill is what women want to fuck you and leave you like they're playing the field but their playing the long game.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:26 PM
2

That doesn't link to a brief definition. I briefly read the thing about "the one". Well it fails to accurately state what the "the one" is, the one is a monogamous mate you are compatible with and can raise a stable family with, they aren't prefect in any way, relative to you or otherwise. Nobody is, and they aren't the only person in the world one could have done this with. Hell you could have multiple wifes. The page reads like nobody every had a life long happy marriage, and anybody who did w…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:20 PM
1

I know what the phrase means, what I'm mean is what specifically their hard truth? Is there just one or many? What truth does one have to understand to be "redpilled" in this context.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:09 PM
1

Everyone know's the historical reasons why people are more offended. It doesn't make it any less hypocritical to condemn a group for their attitudes to a group. Then use their actions to call the entire group they are from shitty, based upon the actions on a forum most men have never heard of. Of course the sort of morality the author and much of society has looks to be based upon opposition and vilification of groups and classes seen as oppressors. Slave morality as Nietzsche names it. It just …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 06:43 PM
1

The spectrum is abstract, there is no one binary spectrum because there are millions of ideas not just two. If you made a binary political spectrum of individualism vs collectivism they would not be at the opposite end for example. If you made it social hierarchy vs social equality they very much would be of course. One of the reasons it's perhaps better to use more than one dimension, like with a Nolan Chart.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 06:21 PM
1

Not all BBW fetishists are feeders, whales can feed themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 06:04 PM
3

Women in China are intent on marrying up, or at least into wealth. I went out with a Chinese girl that was very much the opposite of the stereotype, outgoing confident and not at all shy. She'd been told that she was too funny by Chinese ex's, had it implied she should tone that down. I'm no expert on their culture but they are clearly easily emasculated when they see things in women beyond what they see in themselves. My ex was from a rich family, they gave her hundreds of dollars a month to sp…
/r/RedPillWomen15/04/16 10:14 PM
1

OP I think there could be a biological explanation. Look at the popularity of 50 shades of grey, look at female novels. Strong assertive males seducing innocent damsels. A 1995 study indicates that 89% of heterosexual females who are active in BDSM expressed a preference for a submissive-recipient role in sexual bondage, suggesting also a preference for a dominant male, and 71% of heterosexual males preferred a dominant-initiator role. Why is it ~90% of women into want to be dominated? Look at o…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 09:11 PM
52

Actually to be fair in the UK often men are not imprisoned for such. I mean the legal age is 16 so it's not far off. Though they do go harder on teachers, and those in positions of trust and authority, in fact the legal age is 18 for them?...
/r/MensRights02/03/15 08:44 PM
-9

I'm not hard at all but like I said I'd rather get the shit kicked out of me than live like a coward, get stabbed than just watch a mate get his head caved in with a blunt object. I'd rather that than just stand by and let a worthless thug get on with it. You've got to admit the odds are against them. preemptively smashing the shit out of someone when they're alone and there are ten you isn't remotely legal in the uk and never has been. I didn't say it was, I was talking about just one of you wi…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 09:11 PM
-10

What the hell kind of state are you in? I'm in the uk and even here you can even hit someone pre-emptively if you warn them. If you protected someone whose hit the cops would be onside especially if it's a woman your protecting. Personally I'd rather get stabbed/glassed whatever when a defenceless persons getting a kicking, than live my life as someone who'd just stand there, but that's just me. I've done admittedly stupid things like that before against groups, I knew to have knifes and I'd do …
/r/MensRights17/09/13 06:46 PM
1

Until I find these "libertarian feminists" marching to repeal the draft Well if they are at all libertarian they'd be against the draft full stop regardless of gender. I don't think they are really big enough to form groups and go on marches. Even if they did they probably won't march against that any more than any other group because it's not one of most peoples top priorities, it's not for other libertarians... Even if every single libertarian feminist did march it would barely be noticeable I…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 07:28 PM
4

So is a woman entitled to her ex husbands sperm after a divorce? Since there was an expectation of a family...
/r/MensRights07/09/13 02:45 PM
-1

Can you please explain to me how they align the concept of less government intervention with government payouts Well I can explain that they don't advocate for any of those things, in terms of the state they just argue for legal equality and legal abortions ect. Many also argue for what I guess you could call cultural equality, changing attitudes etc. They talk about equal treatment, rape culture, patriarchy, slut shaming, to cultural marxist levels... So they have similar goals but different me…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 02:17 PM
2

Don't get me wrong I'm not blaming anyone I stating that drunkenness doesn't void consent. But we don't know if he consented at all which is wear the rape issue comes in. Only the perpetrator is to blame for a rape. I was more talking about the circumstance the factual side not the human story. Unfortunately if this is rape there is no evidence at this point, for a court case to be brought. But yes either way OP is very distressed as I said he has our sympathy not to mention needs our support.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 10:12 PM
2

I disagree you can consent if you are drunk and any decision made is consensual. It's just your decision making is impaired, and if willingly drunk you consented to impairing your judgement. Ad opposed to if you were spike there for impaired judgement was forced on you thus you did not consent. There is no virtually no court that will accept a person not responsible for, not consenting to, their actions when inebriated. Why should sex be viewed differently from all other actions in this regard? …
/r/MensRights30/05/13 08:08 PM
4

Well I hear it beats the shit out of that mid way stage at the end of it between pregnancy and no longer being pregnant...
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:49 PM
2

I don't think she told the kid it was comparable to rape to be fair... I tried to teach my daughter how to stop this from happening I taught my daughter the preschool block precursor of don’t “get raped” As in taught her he to keep her castle safe build it far away and with stronger foundations. Not necessarily told her it was a precursor to rape. Hey didn't she just do the preschool block precursor of slut shaming and victim blaming omgz!...
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:44 PM
229

No, the text reads "usually said of" As opposed to claiming sexism is "usually of". It isn't sexist it's pointing out sexism, though perhaps very unintentionally.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:19 PM
3

Sorry to lower the tone but it's ironic for a country shaped like a giant penis. Also as someone who stick up for you guys, throwing round words like "pussified" isn't going to help you MRA's out at all.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:13 PM
1

I think you miss understood the post, a male-feminist website had that ad. I like Asian girls no more than western ones *all though my post history might suggest otherwise...But I prefer aspects of Asian attitudes to sexuality, though there's messed up stuff too that are pretty gross. The aspects I'm talking about is that innocence, cuteness being sweet is considered attractive in some cultures there. And yes a woman can be all those things and not some indentured servant... Where as here it's m…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 12:51 AM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:51 PM
1

You should if you haven't already I don't know where it could go /r/funny?... It's gold, it's hilarious, I laughed my ass off, totally ridiculous puritanism. I know I'd love to see the exchange, if you post it please reply a link to me. It also makes a point and they banned you for that... They deserve to be made an example of. What kind of new-speak do these people want? I think perhaps they deliberately set such stringent standards no normal person will ever meet, or even want to meet so they'…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 08:25 AM
2

Yeah it just responds to the word refuge...
/r/MensRights08/04/13 08:06 AM
1

Yeah no shit has it been used like that, that's hilarious. What's wrong with those people just looking for excuses to be offended everywhere. I mean not even warning you but banning you it's just insane. I didn't think they could shock me any more but wow.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 12:19 AM
2

Yep, how dare you question their ideology and they're feels with logic and reason. I mean if people were allowed to question things there, people might deviate from SRS dogma... I mean look at your dangerous up votes. They actually tried to claim you were giving feminism a bad name? I cant really help with subs that wont ban you...
/r/MensRights07/04/13 11:40 PM
1

What for? This post?
/r/MensRights07/04/13 10:04 PM
3

I hope that goes down well a lot of feminist subs won't let you post this stuff. Not all but a lot of feminists subs don't seem to want to have this discussion.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 09:51 PM
1

If you have a bullshit definition of rape yes, yes she's raping me... For rational human beings no she's seducing me.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/13 09:46 PM
0

Nope, maybe for you but even when I'm with a girl I have full access to, who will do pretty much whatever I want whenever I want. Still pretty hard to say no when she instigates.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/13 10:42 AM
-6

No I'm not trolling, you've just evaded the issue, turned it about what she did to you. Kick her out for all I care I don't see how you such an "alpha" giving her an extra three months. Yeah you need someone to take care of your daughter, but I don't see how it'll be different then. It was her choice not your's? I know it ain't easy turning down sex but it is a choice. You don't sound like a bad guy but I don't see how this stuff you guys on this sub are into can go well. Much of it's just bitte…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 11:22 PM
-4

What is evil about it from her perspective? How is it not wrong for you to treat her in a way that she see's as evil? Simply for your pleasure, it's selfish and fucked up. There is a cosy medium point between being a door mat and taking advantage. This "RedPill" stuff is just a guide for creating an emotionally abusive relationship.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 10:48 PM
3

If you are a mod on r/feminism how could you promote this mans book? He treats women awfully, it's like something off of r/TheRedPill...
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:27 PM
-4

stop white knighting. Fuck off, I don't give a shit what her gender is. That's just a bullshit way of defending an action, wtf is with this sub. I'm only going by the fact he said "it's evil" (rough quote). By that he implied on she may have done it with hopes of prolonging her stay.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 08:45 PM
-9

In no way, whatsoever... I said she prostituted herself not that she had no agency. She is leeching off of him. They are not objects *which is why they shouldn't be treated that way. Nor are men Cash Machines, treating them as such is wrong too. Though at least she may be doing it for her daughter he was just getting his dick wet. Not that it's easy to turn a bj down...
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 08:35 PM
1

A huge bureaucratic government that some how stops us from using the "freedom and justice" it allows us being used to obtain our own goals that may include wealth and power... I do how ever think there could be an actual way our of the present state-capitalist system though. Not collective (state) ownership of the means of production, but individual ownership. If hardware became more open source, if we could produce vital consumer goods ourselves and the machines that allow that. If technology a…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 12:26 AM
3

That is not "proof". A liberal could say "I am a liberal and I oppose communism". That doesn't mean communism isn't left-wing.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 12:08 AM
-1

I was chatting to a bi girl in a FF relationship who was offended her best friend wouldn't change in front of her, she was hurt and saw it as pretty homophobic. Till I said well girls wouldn't change in front of me, should I and all men be offended? She seemed to feel a lot better after I said that and I'm pretty sure she didn't think I was a homophobe or an asshole. Otherwise she wouldn't have rang her gf and asked to make an "exception" for me latter on. XD
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:45 PM
0

I crazy story that goes a bit like this, a girl my brother knows her boyfriend was a big strapping rugby build bloke. Well her gay friends, partners, who lived next-door took a liking to him. Somehow they put camera's in their house, watching their bed room... It was only when returning a video and deciding to wind the tape back did the guy end up stumbling on video feed of his bedroom and videos of him and his gf going at it. He and the misses went ballistic and called they police...
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:40 PM
6

I don't think we'd have evolved into something different. I think if we lived for another thousand years, The technological advancements and cultural changes that would begin human GM would occur, long before any significant evolutionary changes. I think in 5 million years we'd mostly be the product of many years of gradual engineered changes. Not natural selection, but unnatural gradually transformed into something else. Adapting ourselves to our surrounding rather than waiting for nature to...
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:17 PM
0

God damn the Patriarchy and it's some how being the source of all conceivable problems in the known world... Even sometimes some how eating its own patriarchs by sending them in the acid mines!
/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:28 PM
4

Who would be having political debates demanding that African Americans be “held accountable.” Only backwards racists, whom these people would quiet rightly bust a nut over. But if it can be reversed to score a point...
/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:18 PM
4

I don't think so I think it's about assuaging guilt, for social reasons in our society women can sometimes feel guilty and dirty after sex. For generations now, girls, while consenting implicitly to sex, have wanted to assuage their guilt by being able to tell themselves afterward that they had not planned the action, and that they were merely "swept off their feet" by the charm of the guy and/or the magic of the moment. Hence, as all implicitly consenting parties have been long aware, the use o…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:26 PM
9

What difference would it make if she was a "1". If she didn't have her head full of dangerous idea's I'd rate her pretty well honestly.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 07:41 PM
2

"they just do that sometimes..." Don't we though? It is something much of us do, that annoys jealous women. I don't see what's wrong with jokes based around that reality. I'm not offended I'd just point out of a man treated a woman like that, people would flip out not laugh.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 06:04 PM
2

Yeah seeing as he liked her ass, I don't get how shoving his face in it was meant to be punishment...
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:53 PM
5

My friend at school thought that, he did a presentation for English entitled Women, get back in the Kitchens! My Art teacher pretty offended by it asked him if he was serious, he was adamant about it, he came from a traditional background.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:43 PM
3

An argument Rothbard made was that if you drink or take drugs with consent, you consent to having that judgement impaired, and thus are responsible for any subsequent actions you choose to engage in while drunk, even if you may not have otherwise. If however someone spikes a drink with drugs or alcohol, makes you consume it, without being aware of it's effects on impaired decisions then it's a different matter.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:38 PM
1

Somehow, I believe you ANALGAPE...
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:02 PM
1

I think prison rape is normalized as it's a common occurrence in prison, it is "normal" there. Thus society has absorb that apparent situation. People joke about all kinds of messed up things, murder, incest, violence, paedophilia, dead babies. It's done to be edgy it's deliberately things that are awful and hated by society. Male pride is a sensitive thing the thought of being raped feels emasculating. Sexual assaults are a humiliating ordeals, that it takes real courage for anyone to speak abo…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:00 PM
3

This persons head is so full of rubbish it hurts...
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:02 PM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVlsFCgMJRI#t=9m37s I think OP posted the wrong part...
/r/MensRights12/03/13 02:10 AM
3

It wouldn't but interestingly, he doesn't actually advocate that. A Gold standard is still a government managed fiat currency which he is sceptical of. Pegging a currency to the value of gold doesn't prevent the printing of new currency. Which lead to the collapse of Bretton Woods and the gold standard in the 70's. He wouldn't trust the government not to devalue and debase it, as near all throughout history ultimately have. He would have put like minded people in charge of the fed not abolish it…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 01:29 AM
2

Here he is on abortion. A federal ban on abortions is as unconstitutional as its federal legalization. My argument is that the abortion problem is more of a social and moral issue than it is a legal one. "Laws alone do not change society, they are a reflection of society at that time"; he recalls abortions were done at his residency in the 1960s in opposition to the law. So if we are ever to have fewer abortions, society must change again. The law will not accomplish that. He seeks a cultural ch…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:48 AM
3

She sounds unstable, she's a danger to you she could use a weapon and seriously injure you. You could accidentally get her pregnant do you want to put a kid in the mix? She could abuse any offspring you had, as well as threaten to or actually deny you custody. She could make it look like you abused her, give you a record put you away even. Say you go to the police, say they believe you, what then? What good will come of it? Will she kiss and make up never do it again? They'll bail her and you'll…
/r/MensRights10/03/13 10:14 PM
1

The claim from blood types the average is 10%, but can blood type as a test really be trusted? The number from DNA paternity tests is 15%. I would guess the actual figure is below both those estimates... Michael Gildings 3% sounds more likely to me.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 04:11 PM
6

It's disturbing that schools are treating students more and more like prisoners. With cops being called on kids doodling guns... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nlnwm11d6II
/r/MensRights03/03/13 11:25 PM
1

Yeah it's called manslaughter if the intent isn't to kill. It's assault with a deadly weapon, which is certainly very serious.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 11:10 PM
2

Hitting someone in the face with your fist is a potentially lethal blow it happens all that time... It's often called "one punch manslaughter" here in the UK.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 11:09 PM
1

There are people like that but 27 Likes? That seems the most unlikely bit it has to be a fake.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:32 PM
2

If that appealed to you, unless you were mistaken it was being ironic you are probably to dense for science... It could work in the way it makes the many capable women want to prove they aren't vapid idiots like those who made that video commissioned by the EU seem to think.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:31 PM
1

Yeah in my country the legal age is 16 and males have been known in cases to not get jail time for going below that. Would all males get jail time in the states for 17? Seems crazy to me.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:34 PM
5

Yeah the woman was crazy all I could think was, rape you? Even if you were begging for it offering me wads of cash I'd still rather stick it in a cactus...
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:32 PM
1

Not at all there is nothing wrong with it, it's consensual and natural, plus there's plenty to enjoy for both parties. But some extreme feminists have made such claims. I'm saying that being penetrated is an inherently submissive act, that doesn't mean the person being penetrated can't take a dominant role. One could argue positions like "cowgirl" can be dominant but it's debatable, and certainly not always. But to switch roles usually involves adding counteractive acts of dominance to the proce…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:05 PM
1

I can't help but think there's other reasons, such as heterosexuals males unwanted sexual advances, annoying them. However I think the real issue is that as it's socially and psychologically perceived, the act of penetration is one of male dominance and females by choice submitting... Penetration is the dominant role, I can imagine feminists having issues with this particular aspect of nature itself. If I'm right it would explain it.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:29 PM
5

That sounds bad, but I did read that Oslo had become the rape capital of Europe and all those arrested made in the city were immigrants... It could all just be hyperbole and anti-immigrant hysteria though.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:14 PM
2

I stopped reading after a few sentences doctors orders...
/r/MensRights22/02/13 02:13 AM
3

As my friend with a somewhat tiny penis say's "it's not big, but it's fucking good!" It's all about being confident and happy with you're self.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:54 PM
14

The ancient Greeks thought big dicks were a bad thing and small ones were the ideal... But it probably had a lot to do with their love of paedophilia... ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:52 PM
1

While I agree with you that a lot of the /r/anarchy anarchists with gender equality and equality in general needs a state for a lot of what they advocate. I do think there are cultural aspects of feminism that don't need a state. Like you said many are cultural Marxists, they desire a cultural adoption of their ideology, one doesn't need that sate for that...
/r/MensRights07/02/13 06:30 PM
2

Self policing if people did their bit go on new and weed out the rubbish... Also wasn't /r/masculism made for this reason?
/r/MensRights02/02/13 01:16 AM
3

Well also lots of people here have varied political beliefs for me it's not just about equality. I want people treated well I don't want a measure that treats men and women equally badly. Nobody should be forced to kill and die against their will as far as I'm concerned. If I were an Americian I'd be asking should I sign this? What if it gets popular? I'm not a pacifist but as the last surviving soldier of WW1 said "war is legalised mass murder"...
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:19 PM
1

Most people in the work force didn't work in real estate or the construction industry. The housing bubbles bursting still had massive effects on the wider economy. That was a drop in the ocean compared to restructuring in this scenario. The stock markets would be in a state of irrational panic. If the capitol structure arguement is lost on people. Without 50% of the population to demand consumer good think how many jobs would be lost So when all the teachers go where do fathers put their kids? M…
/r/MensRights11/01/13 07:20 PM
1

So It would still affect the market dramatically... Does the housing market directly contribute much to the economy? No, just houses but when it collapsed it caused the recession. If the capitol structure argument isn't working for you. Think of all the people that would be out of work without 50% of the population demanding consumer goods...
/r/MensRights11/01/13 07:07 PM
1

Probably but not for the reason you say. Many men could starve without women if such a huge portion of the workforce disappeared. Such a thing would completely destroy the "capitol structure", cause a stock market crash and a depression would likely ensue.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:48 AM
1

To give it context I swear they were married for about a week and decided they were best off friends...
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:19 AM
11

Can't wait huh? She's just oozing with penis envy. ;)
/r/MensRights21/12/12 11:24 PM
2

Hmm it actually could make things tricky males are twice as likely to dies in an accident as females, so they pose on average greater risk. If they have to take gender out of the equation they'd have to financially balance, and keep track of how many males and females they insure totally to take into account that indicator of risk. If in the unlikely event that cause error it could lead to losses. It's logical that they'd raise it for women, but all it'll tale is one large under cutter to take t…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 11:20 PM
8

Voodoo? You don't think it makes it worse for the victims knowing perverts watch their suffering? I read an article with the most watched victim saying exactly how it made dealing with the abuse she suffered under her father worse... Just 0's and 1's to you maybe. Irrational? Why the hell would we not try to protect our kids just like we'd want to be protected.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 12:23 AM
1

Translation reads "men can also be victims of violence against women" Kind of says it all...
/r/MensRights19/12/12 12:19 AM
1

True which is why that girls doing well dominating boys her age but when they all hit puberty and those "drugs" kick in? No chance.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 11:50 PM
1

Yeah who's to say what Toy's R us is doing is outdated, how is it? it's 100% in the now it's just not part of the future the Swedish government want's to bring about. Glad I'm not from there I wouldn't want to experiment with my kids, let alone the government do it... If I have them they're getting what I know works.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:05 PM
2

It's worth remembering its a UK site the UK the legal age is 16 so standards are different... Only a few months and it would have been legal in all cases. I think rightly or wrongly women are prosecuted as society judges them morally, rather than see's teenage males as victims. Yet if they were children it would be viewed differently... The nature of sex male penetrating female makes the male seem dominant psychologically. It's seen as she submitted to him, adult or not, I doubt such a view of s…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:46 PM
-1

I think a much better response is sorry I'm biologically programmed to. I try not to but... Oops did it again...
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:50 PM
1

In turkey in order to avoid conscription, they ask for humiliating and private photographic evidence you're gay. To count as proof you have to be receiving, this seems to be a mentality that prevails in the middle east. Often people are gang raped in parts of the middle east for being gay... WTH.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:06 PM
2

Makes sense, I supposed if they tried to use it in another context or something...
/r/MensRights24/11/12 12:04 AM
1

Perhaps they were in denial as the truth was so horrible they'd prefer to think that wouldn't happen and he made it up.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:21 PM
1

Agreed nobody couldn't get confused not in that context, I don't know why they mentioned it, I was just confirming it's UK slang. Maybe its generational or regional, most 10-30 year olds would know it here. It's more used in play ground insults and banter than a gay scene thing. Might be that as well but I don't know...
/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:15 PM
2

Cuffed means pleased. Chuff means arse, how've you not heard that? Google up the chuff if you dare...
/r/MensRights23/11/12 10:13 PM
2

Murry Rothbard on the poster should have been a give-away... He's written great things on gender issues.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 10:40 PM
0

Well feminists aren't going to approve of this use of female freedom. I'm with OP on the economics and personal rights think this is a self destructive behaviour, physically and psychologically. Being use as a fuck toy is damaging, whatever your gender.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:17 AM
2

"collapsed simultaneously on the same swooning couch." Probably laughed too hard at that...
/r/MensRights29/10/12 10:24 PM
3

He should have fake cried like there was no tomorrow and called her insensitive...
/r/MensRights21/09/12 06:35 PM
2

What if I regret it the next day? Doubt its rape then...
/r/MensRights21/09/12 06:19 PM
2

People will choose who they live with no matter what the law says...
/r/MensRights03/07/12 07:37 PM
4

Isn't it said that most people who tend to me assertive in normal life tend to be submissive in the bedroom? I know I'm a pretty passive intellectual and have never had any complaints except ironically to say I'm too dominant in the bed room and can never enjoy being submissive and always take charge...
/r/MensRights02/07/12 08:28 PM
35

Yeah you know, because this broads shagged one intellectual, she's must know what their all like In the sack. "they will usually cheat on him". That must be a reflection of him of course.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 07:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter