| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Starting to experience the effects of being posted in an "Are we dating the same guy?" FB groupThats because society assumes all women are young nubile maidens | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/05/23 10:57 PM |
| 2 | Starting to experience the effects of being posted in an "Are we dating the same guy?" FB groupThats how postboomer women are. Especially if theyre cishet feminine women under forty. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/05/23 10:56 PM |
| 1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.They say women mature earlier than men. Biologically yes. But psychologically? I doubt it. Especially since young women are the default portrait of womanhood. Female youth is a goddess complex. When a female hits her seventh birthday, she gets it in her head that she is a royal descendant of Venus. Through her teens, twenties, and thirties, women are plagued with subliminal sense of godhood just from their looks and cutesy gestures. And it's mostly the fault of heterosexual men being the shallow… | /r/MensRights | 29/12/22 07:35 AM |
| 1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.It's overcrowded, the weather is drab, the UK wants to be like Americans, etc. There's a reason why British folks left to go to Canada US and Australia en masses. Most of contemporary British culture is imported from former colonies. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/22 07:30 AM |
| 1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.Wrong. Rich neighborhoods can have the same amount of crime, it's just that rich folks can pay off authorities. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/22 08:21 AM |
| 1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.What about Patrick Bateman? He had great education. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/22 05:12 AM |
| 2 | Why would biology laws should only applies to human malesThat's why men will always get fucked over. As long as you are willing to take the bullet in exchange for mutual respect, you will always get fucked over. No. Let women be brought to the battlefront as well. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/22 12:52 AM |
| 0 | Why would biology laws should only applies to human malesDog worship is a plague upon Western society. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/22 04:54 PM |
| 1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.No, we did. We just face a worse enemy than Nazis: NEOLIBERALISM. Edit: Allied forces actually granted amnesty to Nazi soldiers and made them supervisors in scientific/sociological endeavors. cough NASA cough | /r/MensRights | 12/08/22 04:48 PM |
| 1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.Legality conjures up artificial difference. (Unfairly giving leniency for girls, of course bc simps gotta simps.) But outside of it, there's little to no difference. Your twenties is your second decade of adolescence. Thirties is the third decade of adolescence. Forties is the fourth decade of adolescence. Anyone whom says otherwise is in denial. I hang out with older people and I notice a difference between 20-50 and 75+. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/22 02:56 PM |
| 1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.Not just British law. North American law as well. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 05:17 PM |
| 3 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.Because our society has been indoctrinated by the "youth is innocence" philosophy. We've been raised on cartoons and positivity quotations in childhood. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 05:16 PM |
| 1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.But that's mostly for males. Again, the laws with low age limits for responsibility are often aimed at males. Females are given a huge gap. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 01:12 PM |
| 3 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.Society is trying to devalue young people with the the "brain development" theory. The social expectancy of young people has dropped. It used to be that 15-18 was seen as "old enough to know better and have your shit together". Thanks to recession, helicopter parents, and PC culture, young people are having a tough time finding their footing and society as usual, puts diagnosis on them. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 01:09 PM |
| 1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.This is why us single men always have the last laugh. Men throw away their self value for hetero romance. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 01:04 PM |
| 1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.First wave feminism was against mollycoddling of women. Look at Rosie the Riveter | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 01:03 PM |
| 1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.Millennials/late Gen X advocate raising the age of majority to 25-30 to compensate for "brain development". It's all bullshit. It's just an excuse to devalue the youth and allow failed adults to feel more secure. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 12:59 PM |
| -4 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.Statutory rape should only be for cases of real grooming, like Epstein. Alot of statutory rape cases are female minors thinking themselves to God for their male age-peers. Female youth is a goddess complex. They want money and attention without having to work for it, so that's why go for older males. It's only when gifts and attention stop coming that they cry "rape". And it's not just teen girls. Females up to the age of fifty are plagued with this infantile disorder. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 12:55 PM |
| -2 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.Anglo laws make me deranged | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 12:49 PM |
| 1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.I know you meant as in terms of liability. And women were treated as secondary children for most of human history. Irony was, they were far more productive then. Men fucked up women with chivalry. Believe it or not, what we call feminism is actually chivalry. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 12:48 PM |
| 1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.The creation of adolescence and chivalry were the two biggest mistakes made by modern society. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 12:45 PM |
| -3 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.Angloids are really retarded about chivalry. I blame Protestantism. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 06:12 AM |
| -21 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.[deleted] [eletedd] [teleded] [leteded] [deteled] | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 05:52 AM |
| 4 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.No. Children dont even have rights nor protection that adult females get. Society is even less empathetic towards children as personal beings than adult females. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 05:11 AM |
| -1 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.Angloids are fucking stupid when it comes to moral consistency. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 03:37 AM |
| 10 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.This is the fault of white men promoting chivalry so hard. "Daddy's little princess". Fathers are too lenient with their daughters. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 03:35 AM |
| -30 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.People treat 13-17 and 18-24 as automatic senior vs infant. It's not. Anyone less than five birthdays away from 18 is liable for their own actions. Teens are not weak infants, especially girls. That boy shouldn't be treated as a grooming victim just because he was a year shy of 16. If teens are sent to jail for violence, why aren't they held liable for romantic affairs? | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 03:33 AM |
| 48 | She (21) ran over her boyfriend (18) killing him. No jail time.I like how they use the "youth is innocence/immaturity" excuse for young criminals, especially female ones. I'm sorry, but hormones and brain development have no bearing on moral conscience. Huge difference between carelessness and voluntary manslaughter. Besides, people over thirty are mighty careless yet they're never seen as invalid for cognition, even if they have disability. So why should people under thirty be treated any different? | /r/MensRights | 10/08/22 03:29 AM |
| 1 | Thoughts on Jordan Peterson ?Alot of centrists/apolitical folks nowadays are Hitler apologists. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/22 06:30 PM |
| 1 | Thoughts on Jordan Peterson ?That's how male senescence work. You always hyperfocus and strawman male youth while excusing the sins of male elders. Men over forty are hedonist-emperors. Always looking for that last big nut, high, or joyride before they croak. And if they cannot hedonize, they turn into whiny old bitches whom sit around watching Fox News for fifteen hours per day. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/22 06:28 PM |
| 1 | Thoughts on Jordan Peterson ?That's the secret to his success. Regurgitation of cliche parent-to-child advice. Motivational speakers in general are all overrated pep talkers. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/22 06:26 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter