TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Civil-Conversation35 Archive

View 0 posts and 108 comments by Civil-Conversation35 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No onus falls on men. That’s utter bs. No man is forced to send a message. And if a man does it, it was his own decision. It’s amazing how the same men who want rights are the ones who can’t deal with having rights because their victim mentality doesn’t allow them to own the consequences of exercising their rights.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 06:46 PM
1

I'm learning to play the guitar.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:58 AM
1

They didn’t remove any men’s privilege. They added a requirement to women that men don’t have. Now it’s equal. That’s what people here want, no?
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:38 AM
3

Welcome to Asia. You don’t need that PUA crap here. People are still normal. They don’t need to play games. The west is sad.
/r/seduction09/05/24 02:21 AM
1

Welcome to Asia. The west is so sad.
/r/seduction09/05/24 02:14 AM
17

Haha, wonderful. I completely missed that. I’ve heard it before but it didn’t cross my mind when I read the comment. Great comment! Upvoted
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:58 AM
4

I don’t know. I just don’t stick my dick inside anyone else than a woman. And certainly not into a bear.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:06 AM
-19

In that case you aren’t gay but zoophile. (Or both.)
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:06 AM
-1

Inside a woman.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 08:46 AM
1

Of course women have the right to hate men. Or spaghetti bolognese. Or green cars. Or koala bears. Luckily we all have the right to like or dislike whatever and whoever we want. Of course it’s pretty stupid and bigoted to hate a whole sex. That’s why I simply wouldn’t read the blog of such person. Same as such person wouldn’t be my friend in real life either, why would I listen to their bullshit online then?
/r/MensRights06/05/24 10:42 AM
0

Like I said before it’s not even about op but even if it was all he said was two words that can imply anything so im not gonna assume he supports or defends it. The article: modern masculinity rejects homophobia, transphobia, aggressiveness and hostility. OP: So disappointed. You: I’m not gonna assume OP supports or defends it. 🤡 You really don't live up to your name at all So after the whataboutism didn’t work as an attempt to deflect, you’re now trying to divert the discussion to usernames. Do…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 04:35 AM
0

If you're referring to the article yes I've read it and I don't agree with that one third of men but I also don't think that any of those traits you mentioned are apart of masculinity. If that was the case then you would have called out OP for supporting it rather than desperately trying to defend him. I suggest you crawl back into your box You wish but I’ll continue to call out sexists here. because Australia is not really known for its good treatment of men because there is none. The alleged t…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:53 AM
0

I suggest you learn to read before you crawl out of your box to defend your fellow sexist. It would also help to know what a misandrist is before you make a fool of yourself. Because making up stuff about others that they didn’t write and proudly presenting your lack of knowledge makes you look like trying really really hard to deflect from OP trying to sell homophobia, transphobia and hostility as something manly.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 03:15 AM
0

Works every time
/r/seduction04/05/24 04:25 PM
-9

So why then did you say "Sexual Affair" when "Rape" is more accurate? because it absolutely is Statutory Rape.. I didn’t say anything. I asked a question. Is it really so difficult to read carefully before posting a comment? Your question is irrelevant. It’s not irrelevant to understand what someone wants to discuss. Quite the opposite, you can’t have a constructive discussion without actually knowing what the topic is.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:23 AM
-12

It’s what the OP used. I quoted him. I quoted from his title and from the main text because both are talking about different things so I’m wondering what he wants to discuss, the one or the other. And this question remains unanswered.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 03:40 AM
-15

A rise of female pedophiles? Or a rise of female teachers having a sexual affair with a student? Which one is it? Your post is confusing because your title asks about the one but then the main text talks about the other.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 03:22 AM
-5

When you want rights but are disappointed that people reject homophobia, transphobia, aggression and hostility 🤡
/r/MensRights03/05/24 11:48 AM
3

I enjoy watching the sunset.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 11:12 AM
1

if you interpret it as such, sure. I don’t. It’s a fact that it’s just a survey, not an interpretation. Everyone who can read the English language sees what’s in the document. And no “men’s rights” are being violated or concerned by the fact that people have their personal preferences. In fact, it’s their right to like, dislike and date or not date as they prefer.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 11:01 AM
2

I find joy in reading a good book.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 10:50 AM
3

I appreciate a good cup of coffee.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 09:53 AM
4

I love the smell of fresh bread.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 09:37 AM
4

I appreciate a good cup of coffee.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 09:09 AM
3

I love ice cream.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 08:58 AM
-6

I find joy in reading a good book.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:59 AM
-8

I like to go hiking.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:48 AM
-3

I enjoy cooking.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:38 AM
-15

I love the smell of fresh bread.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 06:31 AM
0

Thailand, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Philippines
/r/seduction03/05/24 01:44 AM
19

“Hi, how’s your day?”’or just “👋” even. But I’m living in Asia where people don’t give a fuck like all those entitled brats in the west do. It’s ridiculous that people chicks expect you to be some sort of poet to start a conversation (just for 80% to not reply anyway).
/r/seduction03/05/24 12:48 AM
-13

The supposed “men’s rights” claimed in this sub get more ridiculous every day. TIL: Men have a right for women to make the first move on Bumble.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 06:52 PM
-8

Yeah, and not getting abused and blackmailed isn’t really a men’s right but luckily a right we all have.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 12:04 PM
-15

What does this have to with feminists or even men’s rights?
/r/MensRights30/04/24 10:07 AM
-6

Stop whining like a jealous little boy. This sub is about men’s rights so behave like one.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 09:55 AM
-2

A drink doesn’t get you fucked up.
/r/seduction30/04/24 04:23 AM
2

more people need to be aware of the double standards, which in this case is: It's okay for women to date whomever they want, but if men were to do exactly the same as what this woman is doing, it becomes unacceptable. There’s not double standard if both can do the same (and in fact do the same). Every person on earth dates whomever they want (ignoring special cases such as arranged marriages for example).
/r/MensRights29/04/24 05:36 PM
19

Why would you want an attention seeker?
/r/seduction28/04/24 09:50 AM
-3

Yes, she seems to be in dire need of therapy. Luckily that’s not my problem. It's unfair to the men she's dating who may not want to date single moms to begin with. I just don’t see what it has to do with men’s rights. Yes, there are toxic people in this world who lie and manipulate and who suffer from their demons. Those exist for every gender. It’s not a men’s issue and it doesn’t have to do with men’s rights. Do your homework when you date. Watch for red flags. Take the time to get to know th…
/r/MensRights27/04/24 12:58 PM
9

She can date whoever she likes. Same as you can date whoever you like. Same as I’ll never date a single a mom unless for it’s for a quick shag or NSA thingy.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 12:19 PM
1

What to do? Talk about it. Tell him that you need sex because you love him and he’s hot and you enjoy sex with him. Tell him how not having sex makes you feel (ie, explain the negative thoughts that it causes you, rather than blaming him for something that he may have good reasons for). Ask him how you can work together to make it work. This may take a while and it may also end with you having to break up because you’re not compatible sexually. But the first step is always to talk about and work…
/r/seduction25/04/24 10:45 AM
5

If you enjoyed time with him and want to spend more time with him, just text him that.
/r/seduction22/04/24 01:35 AM
4

These are the main four things we men like women to do when asking us out.
/r/seduction20/04/24 05:33 PM
3

Everything has to be somewhat fair and equal over the long run. I split the bills until it’s clear that we will see each other regularly, at which point it’s usually sometimes me, sometimes her who pays and a google sheet for bigger expenses (especially trips together). Buying the least expensive gift doesn’t make sense to me; it defeats the purpose of gifting. The least expensive gift is no gift. I buy what I think makes her happy, fits my budget and is appropriate given the status of our relat…
/r/seduction18/04/24 07:25 AM
1

They don’t. They banned a user for violating their TOS. That’s not discrimination but their right. The user, on the other hand, doesn’t have a right to use their service.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 05:22 AM
1

Rule #1 clearly says a post must be related to men’s rights, which makes sense because if we all start posting about what we did last weekend, we don’t have a space to discuss men’s rights anymore but chit chat.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 02:18 PM
0

Fact, you are not to discriminate based on race or gender. So yes, a right is being violated. They didn’t discriminate based on race or gender and no right was violated.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 02:11 PM
-5

OP complained in a sub about men’s rights about a man getting banned from a dating app. So what men’s right is he referring to then?
/r/MensRights13/04/24 08:55 AM
-34

It’s not a “men’s right” to use someone else’s property; in fact it’s no one’s right. Whether that’s Bumble or Tinder or Reddit or whatever. In fact, it’s a right to decide who you do business with and who you decline to do business with, every man and woman has this right and so does Bumble and they’re exercising their right here. I understand that how they’re using their right is unfair and upsetting you but no “men’s right” is being violated.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 03:50 AM
11

The algorithm is outperforming him in the act of taking photos, not in the act of dating.
/r/seduction12/04/24 01:43 AM
1

My question remains unanswered: What exactly are the “men’s rights” you’re missing (or see violated)?
/r/MensRights11/04/24 11:03 AM
-17

Because I asked how it’s related and you weren’t able to answer it but got defensive instead. Another person wasn’t able to answer my question either and got defensive instead. That strongly suggests it’s unrelated.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 10:50 AM
-37

The question was how it is related to men’s rights, not how it’s not. I thought the person creating this topic should know this.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 10:40 AM
-48

Is he? That’s why he’s posting something unrelated to men’s rights? Maybe you got a point there.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 09:58 AM
-78

What’s the “men’s right” you’re missing?
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:09 AM
0

Good luck 👋
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:39 PM
1

Ok, so you wish women’s rights to be taken away because you’re angry that you don’t have a say in a woman’s body and “your” sperm in there that you didn’t have a choice but were forced to dump into her. And women are your opponents on a “playing field” where rights have to be taken away to make everyone equally miserable because you can’t stand thinking someone has more rights than you. Good luck with that. I predict you won’t be able to find many people who are willing to support the abusive de…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 10:59 AM
2

I honestly don’t know whether that’s the case or not. It just seems irrelevant to me because a person’s autonomy to decide over their body doesn’t depend on either gender supporting causes of the other gender.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 10:04 AM
3

The one doesn’t have anything to do with the other. A woman’s right over her body doesn’t harm your rights over your body. And if you think you should have more rights, then maybe fight for that instead of wishing others’ rights to be taken away. Otherwise you not only look like a tantrum throwing boy with a victim complex. You’ll also have a hard time finding anyone to support your cause if people see that the very same person who’s yelling “rights for me, rights for me” wishes others’ rights t…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:31 AM
-1

And now women have those exact same options, if it's good enough for men, why isn't this good enough for women? They don’t have all the options concerning their body anymore. And how’s that your business anyway? It’s not your body. If this is 'controlling someone else their bodies' then men not having access to abortions is exactly the same thing. Either men should have control on what happens to their bodies or neither should have a say in any of it. You do have full control over your body and,…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:20 AM
0

And there’s absolutely no reason to take away this one remaining reproductive right, especially given the extreme and potentially deadly consequences of not having it. And that has absolutely nothing to do with men or men’s rights, it’s amazing that this is even a topic here in this sub.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 05:55 AM
-1

None of that has anything to do with women having the right to abort. If the above is what you want, why this thread instead of a thread arguing for having joint custody? Your thread here clearly celebrates that Arizona takes away a woman’s right to decide what happens to her body, recklessly approving injury, death and having to carry a baby from a rapist.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:58 AM
-13

All I'm saying is that, as a man, I couldn't care either way about abortion, and until men are given reproductive rights, it's going to stay that way. Men do have reproductive rights. Where it concerns the men’s body, you have them all at your disposal, condoms, abstinence, vasectomy (and I hope some day birth control for the male body). What you’re saying is that you want to have a say in another person’s body and if you don’t, screw them, let them have babies they don’t want, babies they can’t…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 12:31 AM
1

You would be shocked if you knew how much sex I had just the last week.
/r/seduction09/04/24 07:20 AM
1

“reality” is that you will not get “results” by taking on a hobby that you don’t love but that you think women find “cool”. That’s the true “keyboard theory” here. Reality is that you will get “results” by taking on a hobby that you truly love and are passionate about. Whatever that is. The fact that your hobby “led” you to taking out some ladies isn’t just anecdotal, it doesn’t even show that your hobby is somehow more attractive than others. You’re right with one thing though, to each their ow…
/r/seduction09/04/24 04:22 AM
1

I love listening to music.
/r/seduction09/04/24 01:24 AM
2

I love listening to music.
/r/seduction09/04/24 01:19 AM
0

I love listening to music.
/r/seduction08/04/24 05:58 PM
10

My favorite movie is Inception.
/r/seduction08/04/24 05:38 PM
1

I like to go hiking.
/r/seduction08/04/24 04:53 PM
2

“a strawman argument” for or against what?
/r/seduction08/04/24 03:24 PM
3

Correct. And he couldn’t know before. She disguised herself as a normal girl and only at the last minute showed her true colors.
/r/seduction08/04/24 03:14 PM
1

It’s up to you to let someone extort you. I wouldn’t pay something and someone that I’m not obliged to pay but kick that person out.
/r/seduction08/04/24 03:09 PM
0

I love listening to music.
/r/seduction08/04/24 03:06 PM
2

He can’t know until she makes it clear. He’s no mind reader.
/r/seduction08/04/24 02:59 PM
29

I like to explore new places.
/r/seduction08/04/24 02:42 PM
2

Nah, who said that?
/r/seduction08/04/24 01:45 PM
1

🤝
/r/seduction08/04/24 12:37 PM
-6

But they can. No, they can’t. Criminals don't need the lawbook to confirm that their actions are correct. They are result-driven. You may know more about criminals than I do but it doesn’t change the fact that they can’t establish a contract like this. And you implicitly admit that yourself as you explain that they may resort to violence — something they only need because there’s no contract based on which they can get money legally. If they want your money and they feel you owe it to them-- the…
/r/seduction08/04/24 12:35 PM
-5

Not sure what any of that has to do with a hobby hooker trying to scam you. Anyway, of course it’s up to you and everyone else whether you want to put a foot down and defend your rights or let her grab you by the balls and scam you.
/r/seduction08/04/24 12:03 PM
1

That’s what I said, let her do whatever she wants to do. Just follow the same principle on your end and don’t pay her for the clown show. But if you do, please tell me your email address so I can also send you some bills.
/r/seduction08/04/24 11:53 AM
-15

The guy said it happened in Spain. Not in some third world banana republic. Her friend shows up? Call the police. She claims you assaulted her? Let her prove it in court. Or give in to the blackmail if you want and call it “emotional intelligence” lol
/r/seduction08/04/24 11:40 AM
6

She could have told you afterward, pay to play... And I already explained why that would be futile. You can’t establish a contract after the fact. And without a contract, there’s no grounds for requesting someone to pay anything. Simply kick that chick out so she learns to make it clear upfront next time. That’s how I did it when this happened to me.
/r/seduction08/04/24 11:28 AM
38

She could have given you the bill after you had your meal The bill for what though? No contract, take your bill elsewhere
/r/seduction08/04/24 10:22 AM
578

Yes, it’s called prostitution.
/r/seduction08/04/24 10:15 AM
1

But this is what you wrote: Consent [is] only for women [since a woman] asked "bUt wHaT aBpUt mY fEeLiNgs? "
/r/MensRights01/04/24 12:53 PM
1

I’m not telling you what to do. I thought you want your post to be correct. It says that communicating your feelings to your partner is a violation of consent. You clearly misunderstood what consent means.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 12:19 PM
-4

Yeah I mean I don’t see what is has to do with marriage and I don’t see why sex has to be included. It’s a question of compatibility and this one applies regardless of marital status and can also mean that two people are ok to not have sex, temporarily or permanently or just in that very moment. I think it’s naive and unfair to make sex an expectation or even a condition for a marriage. No one can give such guarantee. The expectation of every relationship should be open and understanding communi…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 11:37 AM
-6

I’m not comprehending your post in any way. I’m simply stating what you wrote. You clearly turned a person communicating their feelings into them violating consent: Consent [is] only for women [as] She asked [about her feelings] Since you now clarified that you actually mean that a person communicating their feelings in a relationship is not violating their partner’s consent, you can as well edit your post to remove anything related to consent.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:55 AM
-16

Your post clearly implied that the woman is violating consent by communicating her feelings to her partner.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:42 AM
-10

Marriage is a deal that sex is a part of? o.O I mean, I’m not married, never wanted to and guess I’ll never will because I never really understood the point of getting married. But I definitely heard much better value propositions of what marriage is.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:25 AM
-20

I think you don’t understand what consent is. Consent is agreeing to something another person wants to do with you or to you. Consent is not to shut up and reject communication.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 09:58 AM
3

My opener is: Hi, I have a huge anaconda, wanna meet?“ But I’m living in Bangkok.
/r/seduction27/03/24 01:36 AM
18

I understand the suit was thrown out already? Sad that these people get away with their shitty actions.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 09:22 AM
12

lol dude…. Bangkok and ThaiFriendly… you’re overcomplicating this. If this chick isn’t a hooker like 90% on ThaiFriendly, she’s still a Thai chick on a dating site which means she goes out with different guys every other night and doesn’t overcomplicate things like in the west. You don’t need all that PUA crap here, no girl gives a shit about it. And you’re just wasting your time if you wanna work on a third world internet chick for seven months. Just enjoy your life and when you’re back open on…
/r/seduction21/03/24 02:02 AM
-25

Is there also something for electric cars but not conventional cars? Or something for LBGTQ but not heteros? I mean, what’s the problem?
/r/MensRights17/03/24 05:09 PM
-12

I enjoy the sound of rain.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 10:02 AM
-1

What does this have to with men’s rights though?
/r/MensRights04/03/24 10:27 AM
3

This has been the norm in Thailand for a decade or so already. I eventually stopped using my real photos and name. I googled photos that look somewhat similar to me and made up a fake name and persona. I’m looking into what AI can do to come up with AI generated photos that look similar to me. It’s not that I’m looking for a life partner there anyway but after my real photos had been posted in one of those groups together with some nasty false allegations I had to be more careful. And even witho…
/r/MensRights03/03/24 10:01 AM
-15

How is this about rights? This seem to be selfmade misery.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 01:25 AM
1

I heard about “red pill”, googled it but found the sub to be quarantined 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights06/02/24 06:09 PM
1

They are calling her a pedophile, simply because she is an adult and he is a minor. Exactly. It's not though. You have to be at least 16 years old and 5 years older than a pre-pubescent child in order for it to be pedophilia. Since he is 15 years old, he's not pre-pubescent, so it's not pedophilia. There’s more criteria to it than this to be diagnosed with pedophilia I believe, most importantly that you’re attracted to minors, which doesn’t seem to be the case here. I don't know why you're so hu…
/r/MensRights06/02/24 01:43 AM
1

I’m not familiar with the Indian laws but I guess it could be. Whether he and/or she is a pedophile the article doesn’t give any indication.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 04:48 PM
1

If that’s the laws in India then I don’t agree with it. In any case, there’s no “victim of pedophilia”, whatever that’s supposed to be anyway.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 04:26 PM
1

I don’t know what “although pedophile” means. The fact that he’s a minor shouldn’t be an excuse for raping someone. If anything a court should take it into consideration when ruling how to deal with him. If she consented to the sex and it’s rape simply because he falsely promised her a marriage, then the laws are pretty bad and I hope a court wouldn’t not rule this to be rape.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 01:20 PM
1

The question wasn’t whether it’s legal or not. The question was how he got a hotel room.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 12:09 PM
-1

Same way as an 18yo?
/r/MensRights05/02/24 09:34 AM
1

“Victim of pedophilia”? Please explain that because I don’t think you can be a victim of pedophilia (unless a pedophile themselves). Same as you can’t be a victim of heterosexuality. From reading the article, it seems the woman is the victim of rape.
/r/MensRights05/02/24 09:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter