TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Claude-Lau Archive

View 5 posts and 98 comments by Claude-Lau on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Esmay is fine.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 06:45 AM
6

As opposed to the chivalric "rightists"? Do tell, how do your right wing brethren intend to foment men's rights?
/r/MensRights12/12/15 06:07 AM
7

Well said. I just don't understand why so many parents are willing to let their boys attend the school. If I had to guess it would be because they need their children to under "schooling" by de facto "babysitters" because both parents have to work all the time.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 05:59 AM
2

He doesn't identify as a feminist. That's apparently enough for many quasi "MRA"s.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 05:54 AM
15

If it was a male teacher denying little girls reading material he would have been fired on the spot, and rightly so. This horrible human being, an obvious misandrist, gets to keep teaching kids. If my little boy was at that school I would pull him out forthwith. This nutcase will probably just take out her frustrations over the whole affair on the boys.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 05:49 AM
1

Capitalism does not advocate for the use of force. Lol. Capitalism has never existed, for a single micro-second, without the use of force. One is not forced into wage slavery. Soooo...people become slaves voluntarily? You're crazy man. The employer must offer what the labor will accept in order to keep his factories running. There is no force here. Have you ever read a book not written by Murray Rothbard about early stage capitalism? Peasants were slaughtered en masse and driven off their farms.…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:19 AM
2

But that's not fiscal conservationism. Politicians who call themselves "fiscal conservatives" have consistently supported the polices I outlined. Obviously they are not actually fiscally conservative; that's why I began the post by stating, "I don't think of actual fiscal conservatives." There appears to be a desperate desire to control individuals here. Either by easing their suffering through taxation or punish their greed through the same process. Individuals are only free if they are free to…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:03 AM
2

2) If you have a problem with the way the MRM is "ran" start something yourself. No one owns the movement they only own their respective sites, blogs, youtube channels, etc. I agree. I work six days a week and simply can't undertake this myself, which is why I made this post, in the hopes of like minds coming together. I'm disappointed that it's being down-voted simply because I point out the obvious -- that most of the MRM leadership is far-right wing on economic issues.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:47 AM
2

You're not a Laissez Faire Libertarian but I'm not seeing how your left enough to get out of the middle. When I hear the term "fiscal conservative" I don't think of actual fiscal conservatism. I think of wasting billions or trillions on the military and police and corporate hand-outs while cutting social services that help the poor. Once deficits are achieved, said deficits are used as further justification to further slash social services and make wage slaves even more desperate. Also, "trickle…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:42 AM
2

Ok, well just to make sure we're not talking past each other... The word "libertarian" was first used in Europe and even the United States to refer to anarchism, which is both anti-statist and anti-capitalist. Over time, the term "libertarian" came to be associated with far-right wing capitalism a la Milton Friedman, the economic advisor of the butcher Pinochet in Chile (Pinochet was one of Maggie Thatcher's best pals), but also support of civil liberties, at least when capitalist interests aren…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:28 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:23 AM
4

This makes you libertarian not left-libertarian. Pretty much the litmus test for libertarianism is being socially liberal and fiscally conservative. Nope. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism Libertarian socialism (sometimes called social anarchism,[1][2] left-libertarianism[3][4] and socialist libertarianism[5]) is a group of anti-authoritarian[6] political philosophies inside the socialist movement that rejects socialism as centralized state ownership and control of the economy,…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:21 AM
7

I don't support what is termed "the left" either. However I do support certain ideas traditionally associated with the left. There are broader issues at play. To use a really extreme example: the far right in Bolivia, with the support of the American state and at the behest of American corporations, successfully privatized water. That meant it was illegal to collect rain-water. The policy was consistent with anarcho-capitalism, the extreme end of right-libertarianism. The law was overturned afte…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:18 AM
4

Tell me about it. Rich people are leeches.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:02 AM
4

That would be great. I hate righties and fascists even more than I hate feminists. The problem is that eg Karen Straughan is constantly pushing far right wing views on economics. So I think there needs to more balance in the leadership. Edit: also, if we truly care about the well being of men and boys, we do occasionally have to delve into politically charged issues. MRA's point out the fact that most war deaths and homeless people and workplace deaths are male. But how do we fix said problems? …
/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:59 AM
1

Heh.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:50 AM
25

Meh, too many claims for Deen to not be at the least a massive asshole. True. But if he has texts and emails of Stoya threatening to make a false rape claim if he broke up with her that's pretty damning.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:14 AM
11

Bernie is the best candidate imo. No one's going to support men's rights at this stage, but he may do something about poverty-wages for working class men, union-busting, corporate free trade agreements, the war on drugs, war, over-imprisonment, prison rape, the homeless and so forth. If Hillary gets the nomination I would sooner vote for Trump, but wouldn't vote for either of those sociopaths.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:04 AM
9

Sanders also thinks that the minimum wage is a good idea Like all rational people. You should check out what life was like in the US prior to unions and minimum wage laws. Charles Dickens was even more appalled by what he witnessed in American slums than the hell-holes in his native England. In some cases workers literally starved to death. Anarcho-capitalism is no less utopian than communism. Edit: I'd like to point out that I'm being downvoted on R/MensRights for advocating a minimum wage. Tha…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:01 AM
4

This requires a subscription. Someone posted an archived copy a month ago.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 01:57 AM
6

In the second film, Reggie meets the angry young British men who think feminism has gone too far- and some of the women who have felt their wrath, on an internet tailor-made for anti-feminism, and trolls. Damn right they're angry. And they have every right to be. Why is that every group except men are allowed to be angry when they face obvious injustice? Also, why not meet some of the countless women that think feminism has "gone too far"? I agree that the internet is tailor-made for anti-femini…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 01:53 AM
1

These women understand, at least on a subconscious level, that they are not living in a 'patriarchy' where women are 'oppressed.' How do I know this? I know this because actual oppressed groups don't get to act toward the police in the manner shown in this video. Also, since feminists claim that male-on-female violence is a plot of the patriarchy to keep women down, why didn't the guy being called "scum" just pimp slap the woman then high-five his bro the policeman? Spoiled children, nothing mor…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 11:16 PM
3

Check out Norah Vincent's work. There's a doc on Youtube. She's a lesbian who lived six months as a man and concluded that men have it far worse. She even used the word "privilege" to refer to females before the term became popular in feminist circles.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 10:55 PM
4

http://ncfm.org/2015/12/news/female-privilege/ncfm-member-tim-patten-on-white-female-privilege-and-the-domination-of-men/
/r/MensRights11/12/15 10:39 PM
2

There is a bit of research that the sexism busters guy found, that finds women are x6 more likely to over-generalize in these sexist ways than men. Interesting. Link?
/r/MensRights11/12/15 10:30 PM
2

Agreed.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 04:55 AM
1

Unfortunately this format doesn't really allow a great deal of explication and I don't have time to write a paper. But I did recommend a few books and essays in the above post to Deefry.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:38 AM
1

Hi Dingo, I recommended a few books and essays below.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:36 AM
5

Well, it's an interesting and complex history that I sort of dumbed down for this short post. The way I look at it, both the "right" and the "left" are vulnerable to gynocentrism. Some of the earliest feminist literature came from what could be called the libertarian left, eg Mary Wollstonecraft and John Stuart Mill. But the authoritarian Frederich Engles, wealthy benefactor of Marx, could also be described as an early feminist. On the other hand, you also had socialists like Ernest Belford Bax …
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:33 AM
2

I'm not so sure. Increasingly I'm hearing feminists say that "women's work is devalued," and that's why they make less money. "Why should a nurse earn less than an engineer?" etc. etc. When you bring in the issues of hours worked and workplace deaths it challenges them from the left rather than the right (which they already reject). Perhaps it's more a question of whom your audience is. Remember that most of these people don't subscribe to "free market" ideology and are already anti-capitalist (…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:05 AM
2

Take the circumcision thing. There's always talk of 'bodily integrity' and 'loss of sensation'. No. The only argument that's needed is 'Circumcision Kills Babies'. Good point. If you want to win the debate don't fight on ground that you didn't choose. For example if the discussion is about the gender wage gap point out that it is largely due to women choosing lesser paying degrees, throw out some bait and then switch the whole thing to a discussion of the education gender gap where women account…
/r/MensRights11/12/15 02:16 AM
6

Karen bringing the smackdown as usual.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 02:07 AM
4

Absolutely disgusting. This is what happens when you raise narcissistic little monsters who try to ape male behaviour while simultaneously giving them carte blanche to do what ever the fuck they like.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 01:45 AM
1

Based on what I see on this sub, East-Indian women seem to have much more compassion for men and boys than their Western counterparts. Can someone explain why? Or am I misreading the cultural dynamics?
/r/MensRights11/12/15 01:39 AM
2

The picture at the top of the article is fucking hilarious. Edit: Best Tweet: Stop the cultural appropriation of elves today! And: Stop mouth-rape!
/r/MensRights11/12/15 01:15 AM
1

Mind, sometimes I drink beer and reddit. To be fair, I was doing exactly that in the post he was replying to. I'm pretty sure I made an edit at some point, so who knows what I said originally :)
/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:05 AM
3

I agree. Shives is one of the MRM's most obnoxious critics, but this video puts him in an entirely different light. From the comments: as a psychologist you could just send me any picture, not even a video, of those two interacting and i would say that it is a very unhealthy relationship. the domination, condescension and "superiority"in her body language, voice and passive insults over his "misogyny" are all dead giveaways that she controls him as a pet, not as a human. she constantly rolls her…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 11:29 PM
3

The libertarian writer Justin Raimondo of anti-war.com offered this theory about six months ago. http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2015/07/12/donald-trump-a-false-flag-candidate/ The usual “mainstream” media tactics regarding a political outsider they hate is to ignore him or her: the example of Ron Paul should suffice to make this point. Indeed, Jon Stewart pointed this out in a memorable “Daily Show” segment, and it took Paul three runs for the White House to get their attention. Trump has su…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:57 PM
7

Just three days after the prank was concocted — in a move unconfirmed to be connected to the hashtag — Cornell University in the US decided that mistletoe was no longer politically correct. Campus authorities issued a document demanding that students and staff avoid the tradition, because it “doesn’t create an inclusive environment”. As much as I love 4chan's hijinks I'm not sure we should be giving feminists ideas at this point (!)
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:37 PM
8

Women have sexual power. Men, as a rule, do not. Therefore when a woman is subject to unwanted advances by someone she finds unattractive she views it as an affront to her power and in insult to her lofty position; to her, it's like a peasant looking at a member of royalty in the eye. This explains the hyper-sensitivity with which most women view acts of sexual harassment and assault, even if said "assault" amounts to a clumsy come-on. There are two solutions: teach men to value their sexual aut…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:29 PM
2

fixed it. thanks.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 09:59 PM
2

Yep. It's true.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 04:02 PM
11

The differences in sexual power between men and women, and the corresponding feelings of entitlement (which feminists project onto men), are revealed in male vs. female love songs. Typical Male Love Song: Brian Adams -- "I would die for you." Typical Female "Love" Song: Shania Twain -- "That Don't Impress Me Much."
/r/MensRights10/12/15 12:52 PM
9

"I am dangerous." Epic. The comments section for the "open letter" at SFU were quickly shut down after only ten entries.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 04:27 AM
50

However, whenever I say something to defend it, I get shot down and I get disgusting looks from my coworkers. I understand that this is hurtful. Now consider how difficult it is for a man to challenge these ideas. He will be called a loser, a woman-hater, that he has "mommy issues," that he can't get laid etc. etc. Calling a man a misogynist is basically like calling him a pedophile. That's how socially damaging it is. Yet feminists begin with the nuclear option in every "debate." We absolutely …
/r/MensRights10/12/15 04:18 AM
1

Epic white women privilege list. Well done.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:13 PM
3

The comments are just as vitriolic as they were for the first piece lol. They seriously need some MRA input. But I don't have a facebook account and not about to start now.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 10:57 PM
8

This is actually pretty sad. How difficult would it be to help both boys and girls, men and women? Shame on these degenerates. Do you have sons? Why do you marginalize them? Assholes.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 03:09 AM
2

Still...The sandwiches...Who amongst us doesn't like a nice sandwich, especially when the female sandwich maker is wearing nothing but an apron? I for one LOVE sandwiches, whether tuna or turkey. And would you give one chance -- just one chance -- to fight (!) for freedom! Dying in your bed, without sandwiches, they can take our lives -- but they can never take our freedom! And Sandwiches!
/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:25 AM
14

"why do I have to deal with this crap Because women are more powerful than you. That's the brutal truth.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 01:47 AM
1

Excellent post.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 01:44 AM
7

It's a topic that needs much more discussion, especially in anarchist circles. We need to stop viewing women as perpetual victims and realize that they "hold up half the sky", as the saying goes. That includes the negative stuff. It's not just about sunshine and rainbows, there are also thunderclouds and acid rain.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 01:29 AM
1

A lot of false accusations must also go out of the window.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 11:43 PM
9

Here's a real quote that will drive conspiracy theorists wild: "The Women's Liberation Movement may be considered as subversive to the New Left and revolutionary movements as they have proven to be a divisive and factionalizing factor.... It could be well recommended as a counterintelligence movement to weaken the revolutionary movement." This was from an August, 1969 report by the head of the San Francisco FBI office.[4] Within several years, the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations were pumping mi…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 11:24 PM
20

Men and women think very, very differently. Our brains are wired in completely different ways. This is an obvious biological truth that scientists shy away from; they would literally rather discuss astrology. But men and women are indeed fundamentally different. Both sexes evolved in tandem, and neither sex is "superior" or "inferior", we just are. I would say, in common with even the most frightened scientist, that we have more similarities than differences. Perhaps that's all we need. Perhaps …
/r/MensRights08/12/15 10:11 PM
56

I'm gonna do y'all a favour; I'm gonna explain feminism and hopefully prevent a few suicides based on male incredulity over female "logic". Feminists have written about 1000x more articles on "women against feminism" than any particular men's rights issue. Why? Because they know from experience that women, rather than men, wield the majority of social power. It's also why they are so obsessed with getting celebrities to take on the "feminist" label. Women understand, better than men, the power o…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:42 PM
10

I went to a feminist picnic the other day. It was great, apart from the fact no one made any sandwiches.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:21 PM
2

You're right.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:16 PM
3

Not only mythical gods/leaders but real leaders from Cleopatra to Queen Elizabeth I to Margaret Thatcher. History demonstrates conclusively that women are NOT less likely to engage in war; in fact a recent study concluded that prior to "representative democracy" and "parliaments" Queens initiated war more often than Kings (!)
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:05 PM
3

Nothing to be ashamed of, so long as you exited the feminist matrix. The reality is that males are biologically programmed to serve and protect women. That's why all societies are gynocentric. Feminism exploits these instincts in the same way that pedophiles exploit lack of reasoning in children. It's really quite despicable. Anyway, I have no problem with "coffee shop feminists." They are simply young men and women who were miseducated. But the leaders of the feminist movement are quite awful, …
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:36 PM
3

Jesus...(rotting christ) is that an actual quote from Hooks? That's one of the most awful things I've ever read.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:10 PM
12

Here's a guy who gets it. Male feminists are often sexual predators, sorry but it's true. Female feminists are absolutely right to condemn them. Men should have no part in feminism. Neither should women, but that's another discussion.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:58 PM
6

Painfully idiotic.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:45 PM
2

I'd still rather them be heavily fined than put in prison Then we're in agreement on that point. "Possession" is even dumber. I mean why would you want to put someone in prison for possessing some drug? Whatever happened to individual liberty? The whole drug war is just fucking retarded. Unless it wasn't designed for that purpose...;)
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:42 PM
2

I'm pretty sure the age is 14. Any male at or above 14 killed by drone strikes is an "enemy combatant." How's that for privilege? In Fallujah, women and children were permitted to leave the city before the US army leveled it. This goes wayyyy back. In Tyre, Alexander the Great crucified every male of "military age," usually 14 or so. The women were spared, but raped.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 06:57 PM
3

It's a good point. I still think it's a good idea to keep the death penalty on the table. I'd apply it to the cases where there's undeniable evidence such as video with witnesses DNA and fingerprints. It's rare but appropriate. I'm not opposed to the idea of capital punishment. But even in the case of DNA evidence there can be corruption. In fact DNA evidence is problematic precisely because it can provide jurors with the illusion of "hard" guilt even though all it takes to frame someone based o…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 05:49 PM
3

So how did they women get the vote in the first place, without which they would lack ANY power whatsoever? While I agree with your overall point (the sense of entitlement is nauseating) I can't agree with this. Women have always had great power -- arguably more than men -- even when they lacked the vote. Check out this short vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrgovSZ32Yg
/r/MensRights08/12/15 05:21 PM
2

Another thing: though this is an excellent article, I don't entirely agree with the notion that the US is a gynocracy. The US is a plutocracy/oligarchy. It is ruled by and for the upper 0.01 percent of the population (43% of billionaires are women). There was a recent study that more or less confirmed this: 'US is an Oligarchy, not a Democracy.' http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746 Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organised groups representing business inte…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 05:00 PM
7

The biggest problem with the death penalty is that lawyers, judges and police are simply unreliable and often corrupt. They can't be entrusted with that kind of power. People say, "well, I still think we should have it for serial killers," but consider the case of Timothy Evans: Timothy John Evans (20 November 1924 – 9 March 1950) was a Welshman accused of murdering his wife and infant daughter at their residence at 10 Rillington Place in Notting Hill, London. In January 1950, Evans was tried an…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:43 PM
1

There is nothing wrong with basic courtesy (even if it has chivalric aspects) provided it is reciprocal. The problem is that women still want to be treated like "ladies" while treating us gentlemen like shit.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:21 PM
3

Yep. The "feminist" "progressive" prime minister is a hypocrite, as expected. Hopefully he won't do as much damage as Harper.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:17 PM
1

Richard Heinberg has an interesting theory about Adam and Eve. He argues that the universal myth of a loss golden age is based on the transition from hunter-gatherers to agricultural societies. The "forbidden fruit" was knowledge of agriculture. Edited to add: By stepping away from western notions of affluence, the theory of the original affluent society thus dispels notions about hunter-gatherer societies that were popular at the time of the symposium. Sahlins states that hunter-gatherers have …
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:10 PM
2

"I think that there are women out there who get hurt by a man/men and then decide that all men are bad in this way." It doesn't help matters that a great many women seem to be attracted to domineering "alpha" type males who really are assholes. I don't envy women for apparently being attracted to what they find morally repugnant. That's gotta be hard on the psyche.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 03:59 PM
4

NDP leader Tom Mulcair condemned the decision: NDP Leader Tom Mulcair says he has serious concerns with a plan to take in refugees that would exclude some men solely in the name of national security. "We do not believe it is appropriate to make a vast generalization about a category of refugees and exclude them ahead of any processing because of who they are," Mulcair said in Ottawa on Monday, a day before the government announces all the details of its refugee resettlement plan. "That's simply …
/r/MensRights08/12/15 03:56 PM
1

One of them was cultural critic Max O’Rell who in 1903 observed; “The government of the American people is not a Republic, it is not a monarchy: it is a gynarchy, a government by the women for the women, a sort of occult power behind the scenes that rules the country.” Amazing quote, considering the date. Feminists claim that American women were "oppressed" during that time period. Were they? Not according to one of the anti-suffrage petitions, written by women, which argued that they already "o…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 03:43 PM
10

Feminism hurts women too.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:59 PM
3

Word of advice: don't read the comments. Hundreds of lunatics castigating the poor guy for recommending moderation. First world women comparing themselves to slaves. Madness.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:59 PM
4

Seriously. That shit needs to be put in a time capsule or something. It's like reading the message board of some crazy cult. And half of them are men!
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:57 PM
10

Is Warren Farrell a "moron"? Of course not. Most people don't think much about the gender war. They were taught in school that "women were oppressed throughout history". The reason feminism makes "sense" to a lot of people is that it corresponds with our biological instincts: men want to protect women and feel powerful; women want to be protected and are susceptible to damselling behaviour (the extreme example being Munchausen syndrome). The word you're looking for is "ignorant," not moronic.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:56 PM
17

I'm firmly convinced that feminism jumped the shark when it started labelling men "privileged." Throughout history men have been willing to sacrifice themselves for the well being of women and children, asking only for a modicum of respect in return, but calling men privileged "oppressors" even though the statistics clearly show otherwise was a bridge too far. Men can only take so much abuse. We are now going to create real equality, and women aren't going to like it one bit. Too fucking bad.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:58 PM
1

There is a very easy solution to this: segregation. Allow female front line combat troops, but segregate them from men. Women are strong and empowered and can stand on their own two feet. They don't need men to carry their weight. Problem solved. Equality.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:51 PM
12

males are teh terrists.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:07 AM
4

I would start with the collected works of Andrea Dworkin. One of the few feminists I truly respect. She didn't hide behind post-modernist academic jargon (though there was plenty of that as well) but often expressed her true beliefs in raw, often offensive language. Ditto Valerie Solanas, a brilliant paranoid schizophrenic who wrote the SCUM manifesto, a feminist classic advocating the cutting up of men into little pieces. I suspect that you're looking for something like Bell Hooks' "Feminism is…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:21 AM
3

Women are the primary victims of male suicide.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 03:50 AM
2

"We must expand services provided through the Violence Against Women Act and the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act, and fight any attempts to undermine [read: reform] these laws." That's an appalling statement and he should definitely be challenged/condemned for that remark and his repeating of the wage gap myth. The rest of is it just standard pandering to women. Like I said, no politician is supportive of men's rights; all of them have a few areas in which they might help men and oth…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 02:10 AM
61

Bwahahahah!!! This guy bends over backwards to praise Clementine Ford, condemns the "misogynistic attacks" against her, and re-affirms his commitment to scientology feminism; the only thing he asks is that perhaps we can stop it with the "kill all men" stuff? Not even because he cares about men and boys (let alone himself, which he clearly doesn't), but because he thinks it's bad PR. Instead of saying, "you may have a point, perhaps we shouldn't be advocating genocide, even if we're (nudge nudge…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 02:02 AM
5

I'm not aware of a single politician that supports men's rights, save Mike Buchanan in the UK. There may be a few politicians who would support one or two MRA issues, however. Some conservative politicians appear to support alimony reform and the ending of affirmative action; some democrats appear to support child support reform (eliminating de facto debtors prisons). I'm pretty sure that most Democrats, if asked, would claim that they support the idea of more shelters for male DV victims or rap…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:17 AM
2

Rapists are stoned to death in Saudi Arabia.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:55 PM
22

Who's the fucking troll? Feminist makes genocidal comments advocating the mass murder of men? You go girl! No trolling there. Nope. None at all. Men respond by rightfully calling her a fucking cunt? = Troll. Call big daddy patriarchy and have the man lose his livelihood or arrested for "harassment." Feminists have long argued that if women ruled the world it would become kinder, gentler and more just. What we are seeing instead is a complete abandonment of any notion of fairness, justice and ind…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 11:28 AM
6

Her response on Twitter is classic feminism. A bunch of people, including women, give her well-reasoned arguments that feminism has poisoned the relationship between the sexes by characterizing any male overtures as "sexual harassment." She responds by calling them "misogynist trolls." They simply cannot and will not take responsibility for their actions.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 05:15 AM
14

That sounds remarkably like torture...I wonder how many prominent feminists suffer from sadistic personality disorder. Perhaps you're right; perhaps I'm attributing to ignorance, immaturity and solipsism what is better explained by malice (or psychopathic indifference to male suffering in the pursuit of profit).
/r/MensRights06/12/15 11:22 PM
7

Women actually make up the majority of pro-lifers, too.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 10:46 PM
2

...written by a woman, it should be noted. Nice post. A few butthurt feminazis in the comments but most of them are supportive.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 10:34 PM
9

He's just pandering to the majority of voters.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 10:22 PM
15

Despite feminist hysteria, bro, rape rates have been declining steadily for decades. It isn't at all surprising that 91% of colleges report zero rapes.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 10:18 PM
26

To be fair, the author seems to be positing a variant of the "why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free" as an explanation Of course she is. She's not about to acknowledge the role feminism has played in poisoning the relationship between the sexes.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 09:26 PM
127

This reminds me of Jessica Valenti complaining that she is no longer cat-called. The feminist movement is essentially a professional whining society. They are overgrown children, demanding one thing then moaning about the results. If we changed the color of every "female" toy to blue, they would demand that we change the color back to pink. These women don't appear to understand cause and effect, and they refuse to take responsibility for the predictable outcomes of their actions. If you label m…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 08:38 PM
1

Pinker is a psychologist, not an archeologist or anthropologist. His work has been soundly debunked by actual experts in the relevant fields. You have it exactly backwards in terms of "ideological zeolotry." Pinker posits a thesis (hunter gatherer-bands were ultra violent) and basically commits academic fraud to support said thesis. The archeological record alone completely refutes his fanciful ideas. I'll quote the conclusion and leave it for others to decide who is the ideologue: So let us loo…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 08:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter