TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Clausewitz1996 Archive

View 2 posts and 70 comments by Clausewitz1996 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Clausewitz1996/r/MensRights02/07/13 08:47 PM
1

Clausewitz1996/r/MensRights07/09/13 10:06 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

No, there shouldn't. Sentences should be based on the fact pattern of the case. There may be certain biologically and socially driven differences between boys and girls that make the male offender - female victim dyad more serious generally, which may justify sentencing disparities in the aggregate, but courts ultimately hear specific cases, with specific offenders, who have inflicted specific impacts on specific victims. Sex shouldn't be used as a shortcut to determine the severity of the case,…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/25 09:45 PM
3

This is true. Olly Thorne of Philosophy Tube has one of the best pro-sex work arguments I've seen in a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/19 04:11 PM
3

At some point, the strength differential doesn't have bearing on whether or not we ought to expect someone to intervene. An average male going up against three assailants is going to get fucked as hard as any woman. You can talk about averages all you want, but it's meaningless when we're not talking about how strong a person must be to have an obligation (or expectation) to intervene.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 03:48 PM
4

I think the point a lot of people are getting at here, is that her feelings are valid because she's a woman but no one would have blamed her if she ran away if roles were reversed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 03:31 PM
1

Enough that it's not a laughing matter. But unfortunately, it's an understudied issue. But I think the existence of even one is enough to make me support legislation that terminates parental responsibility for victims of statutory rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 08:32 AM
2

Plenty of children have child support foisted upon them after being molested. Can we at least agree here that is wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 01:00 AM
1

The big thing I see is that the administration did not find that the boys did anything threatening Ahhhhhh, I don't know, a group of lads walking into a women's restroom and not letting a girl leave seems... Well, scary for the average woman. This doesn't strike me as an example men being discriminated against.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 10:12 PM
1

Surprisingly non-red pilled response on a sub that tends to go extreme with its ideology at times.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 10:08 PM
1

So I think that between the two genders, men are more likely to go for casual sex. However, my first long-term sexual relationship was with a girl who (in the end) was just in it for sex and not being honest about that. I was made to think that she had a holistic interest in me, both as a sex partner and as a person. I became emotionally invested and when she just dropped me, that really sucked balls. I'd rather be friend-zoned or led on than go through that. At least when a girl is leading me o…
/r/MensRights20/04/19 10:05 PM
1

I found the comments more disgusting than the documentary. Edit: to expand on this, the documentary is correct in that gender roles and forced standards have negative consequences. The argument isn't so much that masculinity is bad, but rather the belief that men cannot share their feelings or seek help without sacrificing their masculine identity is bad for young boys. This manifests itself in many lower income communities through violence, where "respect" is linked to "masculinity" and can onl…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:56 PM
2

What school do you go to, OP?
/r/MensRights30/12/13 03:56 PM
1

I hope you set that bitch straight, OP.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 11:50 PM
3

Yet its not in a language everyone can read. It's unrealistic to publish a poster in every language on earth, but it's certainly feasible to use gender neutral terminology. Just as it's easy to use race neutral terminology when campaigning against crime. Your argument is absolutely ridiculous because it's comparing an extreme (publishing something that can be read by all) with a not extreme (publishing something that takes into account all victims, regardless of race, sex, gender, or nationality…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:34 PM
1

Yet point out its only in English and that is "implying" that only English speaking people are rapist is considered to the extreme. No, it doesn't imply anything. The language is just the method by which an individual conveys an idea. It has no bearing on who the victims are, nor the perpetrators. It's just attempting to spread the word out to an English speaking population. Again, you're playing into the fallacy of analogy. So they can use English get the message out to the most amount of peopl…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:46 PM
6

I know, I was referring to the unintentional implication of his post
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:00 PM
17

You're taking our argument to the extreme--this is the equivalent of making a poster that advocates for black people to not rob whites. It's entirely sexist, and implies that only women have a right to consent. It's extremely easy, factually correct, and a moral imperative to make note that rape can happen to anyone, not just women. Also, fallacy of analogy. Language is meant to convey ideas, and is ultimately less important than the idea itself. The medium they use is unimportant, it's what the…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:49 PM
-2

I guess promoting consent--even if it's in an absolutely sexist way--is feminine...
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:46 PM
2

...the author somehow concludes that he is a crappy partner because isn't sexually active? That doesn't make any logical sense. Sex is one aspect of the relationship, and assuming they got married for more than just the sex, it shouldn't be existential to the marriage. The advice the author gave was absolutely terrible. That newspaper should be ashamed of itself. In any event, most relationship columns are for 'dramatic entertainment' in the first place.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 06:45 PM
2

Saving this.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 03:34 AM
1

Dayum
/r/MensRights31/07/13 07:31 AM
1

Lies. Lies are bad.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 06:32 AM
2

You could get a shitload of money if you sued.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:08 AM
1

By the same logic, a black person should be ashamed of being black.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:00 AM
1

Paternity tests may be a new technology, but it's widely known among most people in our country. It's also not taboo in my country ('merica)
/r/MensRights29/07/13 04:12 PM
1

Yeah, there are universities that are actually applying affirmative action for males in order to even out the ratios. Especially in Liberal Arts and Nursing programs.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 09:19 AM
1

I'm actually a high school student, and that's one of the first things I noticed about the Fulbright Program: that 7 out of 10 recipients were female.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 09:18 AM
3

Good! The comments section was uplifting. I've never seen so much unanimous support for male victims before, so it's fairly heartfelt.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 09:08 AM
1

No, I'm not being dishonest at all. You're the one manipulating statistics for your own gain. The only thing that the study proves is that men would care if this happened to them. It doesn't indicate that men believe that forced paternity tests are necessary (where does it say this in the study?), or that they believe it's a problem (where does it say this in the study?). All this proves is that they would be affected if it happened (which is the question of the study--how men would feel if this…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 08:57 AM
0

Caring if your child isn't yours does not equal wanting mandatory paternity tests. For example, if you were to ask the average white male, "Would you be angry if an individual killed your son because he was white?" The overwhelming majority would say, "Yes, I would be mad" However, this doesn't necessarily translate into a fear of your child being murdered for racial reasons. In other words, being mad over a hypothetical situation doesn't actually mean that you're afraid of that situation occurr…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 08:02 AM
2

Because it's a largely unnecessary waste of money that most couples (including men) don't want to take. The government shouldn't force individuals to take tests they don't feel like taking.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:36 AM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights28/07/13 05:46 AM
11

Fun fact: Police officers are incompetent in America
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:52 AM
3

Those comments made me want to scream. "Boys can easily say no." "If boys don't want to have sex, then they won't get an erection"
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:23 PM
4

That's a fairly provocative statement. Sexual harassment is defined as, "Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature that tends to create a hostile or offensive work environment." In other words, if you come on to someone, and they say 'no', then you keeping bugging them, you are sexually harassing them.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 06:33 AM
4

Where in the article did she claim that five day workweeks were sexist? In fact, she made a level headed argument about productivity increasing when workers were on a four day schedule.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 08:38 PM
1

Record your daughter having a panic attack and march into the CPS office. That's certainly evidence of some form of abuse.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 06:19 PM
1

I suggest that you no longer associate yourself with that friend, and realize that the entire feminist community does not identify themselves with her position. I promise you that if you were to go to AskFeminists and probe them for their thoughts, they would agree with you.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 05:36 PM
0

To everyone talking about how this isn't getting the same attention as Stubenville: Do you know how many r@pe cases there are at any given time? How many men, women and children are ignored by the national scene, simply because there too many of them to report?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 05:24 PM
9

Source?
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:16 PM
4

That seemed to force a role onto men, just for being men. Instead of calling them dickless wonders, how about demanding the same thing from women? From ALL people! It's the equivalent to saying, "Where are you blackless wonders when other black guys rob stores?"
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:13 PM
1

+1 to New Zealand.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:33 AM
1

They dropped prison time and replaced it with a 10 million dollar lawsuit.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:32 AM
1

Yeah, I hate that shit.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 12:27 AM
3

http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2013/06/04/the-subtleties-of-consent-deception-and-sexual-violation/ For God's sake, even the readers thought she was stupid. Read some of the comments before generalizing every feminist into a sad fuck that agree's with the author.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 07:11 PM
-2

TJ makes moot all of his points by being an asshole. The dick, he could actually be a force for good if he acted like a mature adult. sighs
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:52 PM
3

As a male, my doctor heavily encouraged me to get immunized. Not only for myself, but to prevent transmission to non-infected females. This seems to be a U.K. centric issue. Furthermore, I haven't seen any criticism of this man so far.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:49 PM
1

Did she really say that?
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:04 PM
1

Congrads, man!
/r/MensRights27/05/13 05:27 PM
2

First off, I'm sure that Obama isn't blaming male victims of rape. His speech is quite obviously addressed to males who willingly engaged in sexual intercourse. Secondly, engaging in sex means that you should accept the consequences from it, even if you didn't intend to have a child in the first place. That's what responsibility is about, and that is what the President is advocating.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:01 AM
9

I'm a cadet in the Naval Sea Cadet Corps. I have a friend in the Navy who is a paralegal, he told me that any trial for service members is rigged from the get-go. That's why we fight so hard to have them tried in military courts.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:03 PM
16

That's because the Japanese legal system presumes guilt before innocence.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:38 PM
1

They don't want the place to be a sausage fest. They like to even it out.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:36 PM
1

Moscow That's all you need to know about this story.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:35 PM
8

I don't see an issue, he's telling black fathers to "man up" and be there for their families. In case you didn't know, lack of fatherly figures is a major problem for the African American community.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 02:49 AM
-4

Wat
/r/MensRights20/05/13 02:46 AM
6

Because it's the internet. Honest to God, that's why. However, this does not mitigate the fact that his college experience is the sort that I want. When I go to college, I expect there to exist an environment that challenges, but does not penalize, my ideas. Especially since my desired major right now is in international relations, where disagreements are commonplace between scholars.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 01:44 AM
6

slow clap When I go to college, I want to be like you. You are my new inspiration for life, good sire.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 12:38 AM
3

stuff like this is why i dropped out of college. i had a professor in world history teach us that Passover is the Jewish celebration of when they "passed-over" the Red Sea to escape the Egyptians, and then yell at me in front of the class because i wasn't taking notes on her lecture anymore after that Wat? had another professor call me an idiot for suggesting that the federal income tax rates were higher under Carter than Reagan (they were). that was in Economics ...I thought that was basic econ…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 12:36 AM
1

That's a silly idea, the problem isn't that their men, it's that they are hiring dumbfucks for the positions. This is true across the military, where incompetent individuals are given positions because they either kiss ass or do well on an arbitrary test.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:57 PM
4

To be fair, feminists don't even cover women's rights in Russia (another reason why I dislike the modern feminist movement). That place is already fucked up when it comes to laws. Especially the further East you get. I'm sure you all are aware of what happened to the homosexual who was raped with beer bottles... has anyone even been arrested yet?
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:54 PM
-4

Most likely because the environment you grew up in indirectly taught you that rape was inherently wrong. However, this upbringing isn't present in every American home. Stubenville exemplifies this, those boys committed that horrible crime not because of any sort of inherency towards rape, but because they weren't taught better. They were raised in an environment of "jock culture", where being athletic is grounds for having what you want in all cases. Luckily, justice prevailed. Those boys were c…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 07:48 AM
-11

I don't think that she's out of line. Just like you would teach your children not to steal or harm another being, you should also teach them that rape is fundamentally wrong. It's not so much that they are assumed to be rapists, rather that they might not know better. Unless if she is telling you to tell them now, I see no problem.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:27 AM
3

Oh god, I'd buy that up so quick.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 02:52 AM
18

It's just like when some dumbass local official proposes some retard law here in the United States. Not even 1% of the population is seriously considering it, but it's used by foreign countries to insult us here in the United States.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 03:33 PM
3

...What's wrong with her bill?
/r/MensRights12/05/13 03:40 AM
2

It's discrimination against both genders, but more so against men because it affects them more than their female counterparts.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 11:20 PM
3

According to the OP, both were intoxicated. Either way, I'm not making any judgements. This is really vague, so it could be rape or just two drunken people getting it on... I wish she (the girl friend) provided us with more information.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 05:23 PM
4

From the sounds of it, they were both intoxicated. It's hard to claim rape in that case, because neither party was technically capable of giving consent.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 04:57 PM
1

Out of curiosity, have you seen a male service member press charges against a female counterpart? Did the military take it seriously, or laugh it off? What's you opinion on the military's policies on rape? It is it as bad as everyone makes it out to be? Thanks. Sorry, I rarely get to have a conversation with an MP. Oh, what branch are you in?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 04:56 PM
-1

If he had sex with when she was too drunk to make a coherent decision, then he raped her. I think the only exception is if both parties are drunk. In any event, your boyfriend will likely be found guilty. I'm sorry.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 04:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter