TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ClefAria Archive

View 0 posts and 273 comments by ClefAria on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
22

You hit the nail on the head, I think. Amazingly, the narcissism here is at a level where she can (most likely) accurately describe that incident and still think she's actually in the right.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/11/19 01:22 PM
1

Guys definitely have the potential for this as well. The thing is, because they're guys, no one really cares if they are sexually harassed, so their accusations (regardless of legitimacy) are largely ignored, which has the side effect of disincentivizing bullshit accusations, lol...
/r/MensRights28/06/19 03:40 PM
10

Eh, not really. Pessimism/optimism are generally directed toward the future, not present. Also, you wouldn't generally say that all people are pessimists, but that bias the other commenter describes is a fairly-universal phenomenon among people. It's an inherent survival instinct to be more affected by the bad than the good. Think about it: things can only get so good, but the worst they can get is 'you die', so it makes sense to pay more attention to the negative stuff, on a primal level.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 03:46 PM
1

This exactly. These blanket statements create false self-esteem. Want to achieve a real good feeling about yourself? Do something worth feeling good about.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:42 PM
6

This page goes into some detail about how the term is defined in the research that reaches that conclusion: https://1in6.org/get-information/the-1-in-6-statistic/
/r/MensRights28/05/19 08:21 PM
2

The overwhelming vast majority are not definitively proven in either direction, actually. The percentage that is proven conclusively to be true, and the percentage false, are both single digit numbers. It's hard to show it's definitively true because rape is by its nature a difficult crime to prove (consent is a mental thing, not directly tied to physical evidence, eyewitnesses are very uncommon, etc.). It's hard to show it's definitively false because aside from the rare video evidence during, …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 07:21 AM
1

Men have a flatter bell curve in IQ, for example. What this means is that even though men and women have the same average IQ, there are more men at both extremes. More geniuses, more imbeciles. Competitions like these naturally select for the best of the best, and the higher up you go, the steeper the male/female skew becomes. Again, the skew on the low end would also skew male the exact same way, but we don't notice this, because no one is trying to tabulate the 100 WORST chess players, for exa…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 05:09 PM
2

Color recognition is about differentiating colors at all (e.g. bone vs. cream vs. off-white), not necessarily about speed. I can't think of an FPS where that particular ability confers any real advantage.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 05:05 PM
27

Phimosis is the word you're looking for.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:41 AM
2

"Bait" is something said explicitly to get a rise out of people and get them to react, rarely reflecting the person's actual feelings. The more obvious it is something is bait, the weaker the bait is.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 02:35 PM
4

Weak bait.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 02:19 PM
1

'Think about all of the different ways someone without a penis can have sexual contact with someone else. Now imagine that they are doing any one of those things, except the other person doesn't want them to. That's rape. Idiot.'
/r/MensRights02/05/19 12:39 PM
10

That sub is not about autocorrect-caused errors.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/19 12:37 PM
3

None are, really. Technically, it varies based on the individual. But each country/state comes up with their own baseline because it's too cumbersome to take it case by case.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/04/19 05:37 AM
-4

Kids don't know what's best for them, that's why there's an age of consent to begin with.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/04/19 05:23 AM
7

Looks like in NJ, it is actually 16, with an explicit exception (becomes 18 instead) when there is an authority/caregiver relationship. Whoops.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/04/19 05:21 AM
43

Pedophiles don't go for kids because they're "settling". They go for kids because they're into kids.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/04/19 05:20 AM
18

I wouldn’t exactly tell anyone to never watch it. I would, if they have seen the original, as this adds nothing, but does take things away.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/19 08:24 PM
68

Nope. Don't forget the costs of marketing etc. "The studio had said a global box office take of $US300 million would be considered a break-even." https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/entertainment/movies/the-verdict-is-in-ghostbusters-flopped/news-story/b32b89c525233509c899886cbd19862a
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/19 08:23 PM
9

The point is that you have to do both or neither to be logically consistent. Tons of people do the blame part alone compared to the number who do the credit part alone. Both deserve criticism for the inconsistency, but it's clear the 'only blamers' pretty much have the monopoly on this particular logical fuck-up. The point of that comment is to specifically call out that vast majority who only blame, for not giving credit as well. Calling out those that only give credit, again, would be equally …
/r/MensRights16/01/19 01:11 PM
4

I N T E R N A L I Z E D
/r/MensRights18/12/18 02:40 PM
5

Yup, that's the most obvious clue that this is just the "access to porn will turn men into rape machines" argument from decades ago, all over again.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 06:51 PM
5

rape choke inanimate object ???
/r/MensRights06/12/18 06:30 PM
6

that's not what I meant. It's more that I don't see two wrongs making a right. I don't see punishing a lie that has the very real potential of ruining a life as a "wrong". We can already punish people for lying, if you tip the scales that far in the opposite direction, you're doing the same kind of bad decision that has led to the current crop of title ix abuses across america. I have no idea what you mean by this. The Title IX abused are largely a result of lowering the standards of evidence, a…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 04:42 PM
18

"We should punish people who lie about being raped!" "But that's going to hurt people who tell the truth about being raped!" ?????
/r/MensRights06/12/18 01:10 PM
1

Isn't "disrupting hormonal pathways" the way hormonal contraceptives for women work?
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:35 PM
6

Interesting, but unless there's some data about how significantly more boys start school early compared to girls (none in this article that I see), I don't see how this falls under the MRA umbrella.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:27 PM
2

You gotta keep that /s handy, buddy. There's rarely not someone popping in and making those statements/arguments earnestly, you know.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 04:57 PM
6

Even disregarding that you're almost certainly wrong, what does it matter? Should we only care about common injustices? You know, murder is a lot rarer than shoplifting.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 09:48 AM
8

What's this based on?
/r/MensRights28/11/18 09:39 AM
1

The comment isn't really about the decision itself, but about the difference in societal reaction to a man who doesn't want to be a parent, and a woman who doesn't want to be a parent. Neither should be condemned for that desire.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:23 PM
6

Yeah, physically speaking, most men can likely physically prevent most women from raping them. But that doesn't take into account the ramifications of actually doing that. The biases fall in such a way that a man who physically forces a woman off of him is likely to be accused of being the assailant himself, especially if his actions leave any sort of bruise or worse on his attacker. And most people still don't realize just how life-ruining such an accusation can be. So I'm the end, despite havi…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:45 PM
9

Power dynamics are...well, dynamic. A man is not automatically the one with the power, when interacting with a woman. The individuals, and the situation, are variables that prevent it from ever being a constant.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:12 PM
33

I don't see why a sex toy designed to look underage should be any less legal than any other. It's still an inanimate object. Who cares? Hell, it's very arguable such a thing would reduce the molestation of actual children! So it's neutral at worst, and a big positive at best. No-lose situation!
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/18 01:38 PM
64

I don't know where you think you found some "sex boys"...
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/18 01:33 PM
-2

So guy above me calls me a "faggot" and tells me to kill myself, but I'm the one you took the effort to comment and call an ass? Showing your hand a bit, don't you think?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/18 03:42 AM
–

Stay projecting, one of us told the other "kill yourself faggot", and it wasn't me, lol. Who do you think you're kidding? You ooze bitterness, even in a text medium. Prove you stopped caring and don't reply to this. :\<sup>)</sup>
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/18 11:35 PM
–

I already know you're a generic 4chan guy, you don't need to prove it more, lol. How much more of a stereotype can you be?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/18 11:25 PM
–

Actual, physical cringe reading that, lol. Stick to the porn subs and wherever you find others who say "kek" genuinely. Phew.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/18 11:21 PM
–

The one where you literally said you were hoping that the Bad Thing was done by the cop. Doesn't exactly require telepathy to see.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/18 11:02 PM
–

Hoping to feed that sweet confirmation bias, eh?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/18 10:46 PM
4

Okay, sorry, but "spatial awareness" does not factor into chess at all, lol. Unless you're at the level where it's common for players to not be sure which piece is which just by looking at it.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/18 10:32 PM
4

IIRC, a while back I saw some non-professional guy here who said he looked up his best high school 100m dash times and compare them to the standing women's records, determining that if his time was a woman's time, he'd be the 19th fastest woman in the world in that event.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/18 10:29 PM
15

lol, it's amazing to see someone's outrage about negative generalization expressed in the form of a negative generalization.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/18 02:50 PM
3

Most of the questions for the panelists were in the vain of "I kind of like IT for the money, but I only like computers for social media. I want to be in management. How do I do that?". I think envisioning this question being asked caused me physical pain.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 06:47 PM
9

Obviously. Was just having a little fun. :)
/r/MensRights15/03/18 04:42 PM
1

It makes me more angry to understand the reason why.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 04:37 PM
26

transfer people For the last time, they're called "immigrants".
/r/MensRights15/03/18 04:33 PM
10

Depends on who you ask. I have definitely seen feminists say that trans women have male privilege, and that trans men are some sort of 'sex traitors'.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 09:12 PM
25

And unlike the 'old' original sin, there's no analogue to Jesus to redeem the sinners. There is no redemption. You are permanently Bad, and no matter how far you go out of your way to appease them, this perception will not change. They obviously need to have that boogeyman handy, so redemption is not something they would want. Just recently on Reddit, I saw a perfect example of this mentality in a 'flyer' floating around online detailing actions white people are supposed to take to combat their …
/r/MensRights02/02/18 08:36 PM
2

One doesn't even need to be all that 'virtuous' to take exception to the conflation of men's rights activists with rapists and rape apologists. That's an insane position, in my opinion, requiring either a profound ignorance or a deep-seated malice, to take.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 06:29 PM
3

And my point is that under equivalent circumstances, it's very doubtful a man would have gotten the same ruling as this woman did, and that the offered counterexample is not similar enough to the case linked by OP to be fairly compared to it, as I've already explained.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 07:18 PM
7

Yes, in both cases, the minor(s) claimed sexual experience, but I don't consider it relevant in either case, as sexual experience is not, to me, necessary indicative of being of age. After all, minors have sex with their peers fairly commonly.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 05:20 PM
1

They say if triangles had gods they would three sided, but in mans case, they are just two faced. I'm having Timecube flashbacks... Also, TIL the Timecube guy died in 2015.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 02:47 PM
10

The cases are not comparable, in my opinion. In the case in this thread, she assumed he was of age because he had facial hair and a "mature demeanor". In the case you linked, the girls were hitchhiking and straight up told the guy right off the bat that they had missed their ride home from a college party, and that they had finished high school. They made an explicit, deliberate attempt to make the guy think they were older than they actually were.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 02:39 PM
1

Not a big fan of "good men" being treated as something exceptional instead of the norm. It's not about that. It's about pushing back against this narrative that rape and rapists are ubiquitous, and stemming this tide of hysteria. People are increasingly forgetting that the vast majority of men are perfectly decent people, so it wouldn't be a bad idea to remind them. In short, the point is to show that "good men" are the norm.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 03:29 PM
1

When they tried to co-opt that vigil for the Pulse shooting...equal parts cringe and infuriating. People were fucking mourning...
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 01:27 PM
21

You used the word "created", not me. Own it.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 06:00 PM
8

Not true, please at least try looking things up first before making proclamations about them. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bromance#Etymology
/r/MensRights12/10/17 05:34 PM
15

Universally, or just in a certain jurisdiction? It's just kind of hard to believe...
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/17 04:39 PM
1

Well, the correction/backpedal edit could have been enough to push it up a bit. Still only at 2. Comments usually get less visibility as you go down the chain, but you're over 200 yourself. I mean, do you honestly think a thread (so, maximum visibility) whose title is "women shouldn't be allowed to vote" would get a positive response in this sub?
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:42 PM
1

Worth noting that it's one comment, and it's negative.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:29 PM
10

Still conscious*. As demonstrated, a conscience is not required.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:48 PM
–

When did they remove income brackets?
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:37 PM
3

I'm guessing the 18 and 100k+ crowd is only yellow because most people assume they're full of shit? Haha
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:36 PM
14

Well, the all-{sex} dorm ratio was already 80/20 in favor of female, and the plan now is to make it 100/0.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:31 PM
3

The gap is 1.6%, most likely within the margin of error, once you compare only within the same company, at the same level. http://info.haygroupupdate.com/global-en-GenderPayWhite-Paper_technicalreport-X1Y1.html
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:27 PM
8

Male nurses make more because they tend to be better educated, more willing to work worse shifts, and pursue more technical/difficult specializations. https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/blog/2014/04/why-do-male-nurses-get-paid-more
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:23 PM
–

We're generally not into censoring text we don't like, though. We're better than that. I think I speak for just about all MRAs when I say we'd much rather both be uncensored than both shut down.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:29 PM
7

I'd love a source for that 8 times figure, I didn't think it was that big.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 03:16 PM
13

Grow up.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 11:48 PM
3

This video made me wonder: is there any data out there establishing if there's any substantial difference in child outcome with a single mother vs a single father raising them? I know there are far fewer examples to study of the latter, but they are out there. My bit of googling only turns up study of single parent in general.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 06:09 PM
4

Extra T.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:51 PM
10

If you offer a dog a bowl of antifreeze to drink, it happily will, and then it will get sick. Dogs know they like the taste, but they don't know it's bad for them. It's the adult taking care of the dog who has the responsibility to keep it from drinking tasty-yet-harmful things. That's how young-but-pubescent kids are with sex. Adults have a responsibility to not indulge kids in shit that might feel good superficially, but that we know isn't good for them.
/r/PussyPass04/01/17 04:16 PM
–

I'm very amused by your making a point of it being miscolored.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:39 PM
1

No sweat, buddy.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/16 05:34 PM
1

I know what you wanted to convey, hence the very first clause in my comment...
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/16 05:16 PM
3

all of our votes are equivalent. No one vote carries more weight than the other. Though it's not because of race/sex differences, this isn't true, unfortunately, thanks to the electoral college system. Certain states have better ratios of electoral votes to number of people, so their votes count more, for example.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/16 04:43 PM
1

Wow, that's the exact thing I said in my head after I read the article and clicked to view the comments here. Sickening. :(
/r/MensRights29/10/16 03:21 PM
10

Okay, you got me. What is girls divided by women?
/r/MensRights13/09/16 04:41 PM
2

Yes, some people react to words with violence. Doesn't make it right.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 10:55 PM
2

Why are you acting like the only way men can react to emotional abuse is physical violence?
/r/MensRights27/08/16 05:47 PM
2

Whoa, that part about the 25% is seriously victim blaming. No amount of verbal nastiness justifies violence.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 05:02 PM
19

Damned prison hipsters
/r/MensRights06/07/16 06:30 PM
28

Justice Edwin Wylie said in his decision that although the Crown argued she should be sentenced to a term of imprisonment, District Court sentencing Judge Philip Recordon had apparently accepted a defence submission that the offending was less serious because the victim was unlikely to remember it. Think a male child molester would ever, ever sway a judge with an argument like this?
/r/PussyPass19/05/16 12:54 PM
1

"Me? The face? You kick me?!"
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:08 PM
15

There is no way he didn't do that on purpose.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/16 05:37 PM
1

marrying a college educated woman above age 25 sets your divorce chances at 20%. Source, please. That's very interesting.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 06:03 PM
1

Whoops.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:45 PM
1

Dare I ask what "sugarbabies" is?
/r/MensRights24/02/16 05:39 PM
1

You can start by dropping the infantile word substitutions. "SHEdia?" Fucking cringe. Mature adults don't act this way.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 08:47 PM
5

After I heard there was a domestic violence PSA from friends (not watching myself), I had a sinking feeling it wouldn't be sex-neutral. So, how bad was it?
/r/MensRights08/02/16 01:57 AM
-1

To be fair, not just as likely. I believe it was 25% of violent relationships that had both partners being violent.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:56 PM
1

Do you have a source for that 90/60 juxtaposition? That's pretty damning for those who whine about inherent "privilege".
/r/MensRights04/01/16 07:41 PM
1

Interesting that the current top definition was written earlier than that archive link's date. People literally went and found this old definition and voted it up.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 05:31 PM
1

Wtf is wrong with people now days? Do people really LOGIN to Instagram to like or post comment on this post!
/r/PussyPass05/12/15 06:37 PM
17

Even in older TV shows and movies, you often see young girls getting some guy to do what what they want, on the threat of "or I'll scream/say you touched me". The general idea of females of all ages weaponizing sexual assault claims isn't even a new phenomenon.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 12:53 PM
10

As I remember, neither she nor her family had any desire to get him in trouble after this all came out.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:36 PM
7

Grow up.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 08:38 PM
7

First sentence is completely false, so excuse me for not reading the rest. No idea where you got that assertion from.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:29 PM
9

I'm saying that it is very rare for an individual's first uninfluenced sexual urges to manifest at age 18 or later, that's all. Therefore, it's very presumptuous to assume an individual under 18 engaging in sex with a peer is automatically a victim.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 06:03 PM
11

sexualizing children The point is that sexual desires come before the age of 18, spontaneously.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:31 PM
8

It is a men's rights thing too, how many women do you think are getting beaten like that with no repercussions?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 05:32 PM
12

You are a tremendous asshole.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 03:19 PM
2

And thus you hopefully realize the problem with your own attempt to apply what I said about adults with young teens to pairs of fully-developed adults.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 08:04 PM
3

I noticed you equating "exploitative" with the exponentially-more-general "bad" for your straw man. Didn't fall for it, though. When you want to reply to what I actually posted, let me know.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 07:51 PM
2

Maybe nothing, maybe a lot. The point is that 14 year-olds are, generally speaking, notoriously bad at identifying exploitative relationships.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 07:24 PM
13

Stop. Why dont we ask the alleged victim if they feel abused? A child is rarely able to objectively assess their own 'state' like that. I've listened to hundreds of girls on Loveline over the years who are 13, 14, having some 26 year-old fucking them and they don't see anything wrong with it, being positively baffled by the hosts' dismay. It's like dogs and antifreeze. They wouldn't complain, they like the taste, but they're not capable of understanding the harm of what they're doing. That's how…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 12:56 PM
1

Link to that study?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:18 PM
13

Is that in a disclaimer at the top of that article? If not, I'm not satisfied, for one.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:23 PM
5

You should know better than this. If this is how you think, you have no business taking offense at, for example, people assuming men are pedophiles because they're men.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 03:05 PM
49

Okay, I have to say, I'm not very familiar with Yik Yak and seeing people angrily refer to others by their icon ("you dumb fucking pairs (sic) of binoculars") is very amusing.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/15 03:15 PM
3

Couldn't really say either stand-up out show is markedly worse than the other. They're both great.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 07:28 PM
24

I like her show much better than her standup. Now that's something I haven't heard about a comic...ever, I think.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:24 PM
2

With partners who are having a regular consensual sex life, I agree. But these two were not.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:53 PM
1

This is not relevant.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:52 PM
7

It's state by state, I believe. Doesn't exist in my state, happily. And I live with a girlfriend who totally understands and agrees that marriage is not necessary to validate our relationship. Divorce Corp. is a great documentary we saw together about the commercialization of divorce in the US. Even a married couple that wishes to divorce, 100% amicably, no dispute, no custody issues, nothing, can get financially fucked by the system in the process of dissolving the marriage.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 04:01 PM
1

Maybe they took offense over the non-word "politefully"? /s
/r/MensRights13/03/15 05:19 PM
3

Egalitarianism. :)
/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:35 PM
5

Simply include an option in the hotline to press 1/2/3 for male/female/either 'agent', no separate number necessary.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 04:17 PM
3

It stands for "advocate", I believe.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:36 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pain_in_babies See the quoted text in Reference 1, especially.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 12:39 PM
3

It hurts less; as I understand it, newborns are much more sensitive to pain than adults. As far as risks etc., the individual can weigh them himself at that point, with the doctor.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 11:48 PM
11

Parents should not be allowed to just decide to remove body parts from their kids that are no threat to their health. Not only is it extraordinarily painful (and the trauma may even have a permanent effect on his pain tolerance/threshold) to the hypersensitive nervous system of a newborn (and arguing 'that doesn't matter because they won't remember it' is obviously special pleading--think those making that argument would be swayed by someone arguing that it's ultimately harmless to sexually mole…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 06:25 PM
6

Catcalling and rape have no causal link whatsoever. You need to return to the real world. Are you even aware that the vast majority of rape is committed by someone who is not a stranger to their victim? Do you think friends and family catcall each other?!
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:51 PM
12

The plural of anecdote is not data. The implication that literally 100% of women are catcalled is pure nonsense. Catcalling is not even relevant; are you insinuating that 100% of people (I bet you think women never catcall men, huh?) who catcall are rapists? Are you trying to outdo yourself on the absurdity scale? Catcalling is rude, but not a rape threat (though treating it like one is ironically a great way to trivialize rape).
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:27 PM
9

And sometimes people get hit by lightning. That doesn't make it not paranoid to be afraid of going outside. It's paranoia because feminists have pushed a rhetoric that misleads girls and women into believing that sexual assault and rape are a LOT more prevalent than they actually are. Hell, I've seen some talk about a female being raped at some point in her life as if it's a foregone conclusion! The comparison of incidence to a woman in 'normal' society and a man in 'prison' is a perfect example…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:03 PM
14

You're proving the existence of feminist-fueled (what group keeps pushing that 1 in 5 nonsense, even long after its thorough debunking?) paranoia, nothing more. It requires a profound disconnect from reality to think a 'free woman''s risk of being raped is even remotely close to that of an incarcerated man.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:35 PM
2

None of that would matter if she claimed she said "no" in the middle of the act, remember.
/r/PussyPass05/02/15 05:37 AM
0

Speak for yourself, and check out your comment's score.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:35 PM
12

a lot of people on this sub and reddit in general really do just hate women. This is nothing more than absurd hyperbole.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:09 PM
10

The repealing of a law carries with it the message that "this should not have been illegal", and "people should not go to prison for doing this" logically follows.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 12:54 AM
2

you can't go back retroactively and set people free. You can, and you should. Suppose a woman was jailed for attempting to vote before women's suffrage was passed. By your logic, she'd still belong behind bars.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 12:53 AM
9

Maybe bombarded with flags by people who wanted to get it taken down?
/r/PussyPass30/01/15 01:57 PM
5

If that was his plan, and the guys were sleeping, why didn't he just ignore them and set out about his task, then? If the sorority is in earshot of his apartment, then it's going to be in earshot of a bunch of other inhabited places. Your logic makes zero sense.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 05:39 PM
13

He set out to kill women, mostly failed, and then went on to kill anyone he could find. Actually, the first three people he killed were men. And he stabbed them to death (everyone else he killed was by gunfire). I think it's reasonable to suggest that it takes a lot more hatred/'passion' to stab someone to death than to simply shoot them.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 03:16 PM
1

Link, please.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 07:20 PM
1

The sample size isn't huge, but there are dozens that have been using RISUG for over 20 years with no issue. The fact that it's easy to reverse also makes me worry less about issues. http://www.newmalecontraception.org/risug/ I mean, it does look very promising, at least. It's also not very fair to compare it to the Dalkon Shield; it was barely tested at all, and the one study that was done was by a guy who had a huge vested interest in its financial success (whereas with Vasalgel, it's likely t…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:46 PM
1

Well, the predecessor RISUG has been trucking along for quite a while now, with no serious adverse effects, that I'm aware of, at least.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 08:20 PM
19

The exploitation of human sympathy, and our natural desire to protect victims, for personal gain is fucking disgusting, to say the least. It literally makes me sick to my stomach to see this kind of narcissism in action.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 03:54 PM
6

Yeah, the only thing that really distinguishes the MRM is that they shed light on issues that affect males but are disregarded by society, due to the empathy gap etc.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:35 PM
7

Are you implying that the person you responded to was asserting that zero females have ever seriously attempted suicide?
/r/MensRights22/12/14 07:35 PM
6

It's at 1 point right now, not exactly getting lauded.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 04:53 PM
3

You deserve a lot of respect for understanding what's at stake and taking action the way you can, even though it's well outside your comfort zone.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 07:46 PM
2

Wait, I don't get it.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 04:06 PM
1

lol, just glanced at your profile. The pacifier icon suits you. Go troll elsewhere, loser.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 08:05 PM
2

No, it isn't. Get this generalizing garbage out of here.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 07:39 PM
3

I imagine an aggregator like Google News would provide limitless fodder.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:24 PM
1

Are there really only two domestic violence shelters for male victims in the US? :(
/r/MensRights08/12/14 01:29 PM
3

Vasalgel -- a kind of injectable sperm Vasalgel is like a gel vasectomy. Cool sentence, ABC.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 08:26 PM
3

Very insightful.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 07:14 PM
0

Not really, they've adapted the "internalized X" tool to use to denigrate anyone who is in a minority/'oppressed' demographic and also does something they don't like.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 04:17 PM
5

sentenced her to two years prison suspended for two years Just the concept of this still blows my mind. The fuck is the point?
/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:35 PM
2

You gave me the giggles.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:52 PM
2

I think you missed the joke, friend.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:52 PM
2

Tell her not to shoot the messenger, and that it's not your fault she's wrong. If she doesn't like it, take it up with the liar.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/14 03:24 PM
1

How much of a pathetic narcissist does someone have to be to make a proclamation about how they're blocking someone? Facepalm central.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 06:59 PM
2

What you did was refer to criticism of your spew as 'pussification'. Which means you think acting like you do is more masculine, and also that being less masculine is an insult to a man. We see through you. Give it up. Your tier of discourse is not welcome here.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 06:06 PM
4

Are you seriously surprised that (with the ridiculous notion that being inflammatory = being masculine) you essentially yelling at MRAs, the people more sick of hearing it than anyone, to "man up", isn't getting a positive response? Did you take a special class to become this oblivious?
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:30 PM
2

I'm sorry, your complaint that this sub isn't juvenile enough is not really resonating.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 04:39 PM
1

The comments on the site are a breath of fresh air at least, as of this writing.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 04:42 PM
3

Nice Timecube-tier response. So credible.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:33 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2mk5jg/game_journalist_steve_tom_sawyer_beaten_and/cm5a42d
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:29 PM
8

Considering the pervasive anti-male bias in this sort of issue, I could imagine how a male victim could be bullied out of contacting authorities in the moment. Not implausible, at least.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:28 PM
2

Murder mystery? Yeah, Revenge of the Nerds, definitely. /s
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:28 PM
1

No basis for anything in the OP, no response to any of the very reasonable requests for elaboration. It's obvious this ignorant person just felt like creating an inflammatory thread, and projected their own trolling onto us. Downvote and move on, people.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 08:47 PM
5

Funny that the 1 in 6 number for males doesn't undergo such magical changes, huh?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 04:01 PM
8

"Notes" include reblogs that contain criticism. Don't assume that 30k is all support.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:29 PM
0

Just let the downvotes flow, so that it's public what is thought of this level of discourse.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 04:27 PM
7

You have a truly absurd idea of what video games are, friend. They cover an extremely wide spectrum. What you describe as "every single video game" is a tiny minority, and a good chunk of those are tongue-in-cheek about it. Broaden your horizons.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 05:23 PM
3

It's only the first time, though, isn't it? I thought the newest player to join the four after one wins the first bidding game always ends up as the first bidder on the next one. And the first four are randomly selected, so...
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/14 10:06 PM
12

Can we avoid childish things like "lamestream media"?
/r/MensRights06/10/14 05:52 PM
2

They also called themselves that. Non-sequitur.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 05:24 PM
4

We can make our points without relying on childish name calling. Just like political moderates are turned off by "Rethuglican" and "Dumbocrat", people potentially receptive to men's issues (since they're initially invisible to most) are more likely to write us off if that's the way we communicate. It implies a lack of merit, even when you are completely in the right.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 05:10 PM
4

Terms like "feminazi" do neither you nor the MHRM any service. There is no need to stoop to that level.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 04:58 PM
1

Are you accusing me of being stereotypically British?
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:20 PM
5

Talking down to someone rarely does anything but make them close up more.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 03:03 PM
5

The condescension at the end there is disrespectful and completely uncalled for.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:27 PM
1

Where is the outrage from all of these reasonable feminists when NOW lobbies against joint custody legislation, when it's obviously unfair to default to maternal custody, and they want to keep it that way? At best, this supposed 'reasonable majority' is complacent.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:31 PM
4

/r/feminism makes no pretense about the focus of their sub. They do, though.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:28 PM
10

Nice stealth edit. The original comment was along the lines of 'if it was me being threatened I'd go take care of it myself', nothing about "reporting" it, like they changed their comment to read. Hence Kolz and my reaction of 'randomly confronting someone you don't know who threatened you/r family is stupid'.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:26 PM
2

Their comment originally said they would go confront the 'threatener' on their own, not what they've since edited their comment to say. Hence Kolz and my response.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:25 PM
2

By all means, feel free to find data that shows a trend toward any of those things in rapes by strangers. I have seen no such thing. On top of everything, the vast majority of rapes aren't even the 'grab off the street' type, but are done by someone known to the victim.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 09:25 PM
3

Feminists may tell you it's a very common belief, but in reality people do not blame people (not women, at least) for being raped. Also, the bullet points are simply misinformation. Rapists don't carry scissors. They don't care how long your hair is. And it's been shown that they don't favor revealing clothing either. Not only isn't there a "rape culture", but the opposite is true, as the OP clearly demonstrates. There is a culture of rape alarmism.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 05:11 PM
-4

Key word is "unknown". You could not possibly justifiably assure anyone of that.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 04:49 PM
-5

You don't know what's stupid about confronting an unknown person who's threatened your life and that of your loved ones? Really? EDIT: Nice stealth edit. To downvoters, the original comment was along the lines of 'if it was me being threatened I'd go take care of it myself', nothing about "reporting" it, like they changed their comment to read.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 04:35 PM
2

"Never initiate malicious violence." How's that?
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:29 PM
3

Exactly what I was hoping to see, and evidence against exactly that assumption that this is the top comment. Well stated.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:27 PM
4

I feel cleansed after seeing the comments, and the number of men and women calling this entitled narcissist out.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:36 PM
6

This stereotyping bullshit is not welcome here.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:55 PM
9

We can't as a society attempt to legally mandate mind-reading. A person is not a rapist just because his partner never actually withdrew consent outside of their mind, for crying out loud. You want to hold people to a literally impossible standard.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:31 PM
2

Making spontaneous, passionate sex a legal minefield is a pretty obvious foundation.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:56 PM
4

Please give one hypothetical example of how this legislation helps catch a hypothetical rapist in a way that current laws don't.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 05:55 PM
2

Of course, the realizations that make this fourth wave possible also create the awareness that allows one to see that the name "feminism" itself is antithetical to the ultimate goals of fairness and equal treatment for all. Hence "egalitarianism" = 'fourth wave feminism'.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 08:22 PM
1

Except it immediately and completely stops working as an insult when you say it to a girl. See how that works?
/r/MensRights19/08/14 03:33 PM
0

That's remarkably insensitive of you.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:47 PM
1

You're confusing "my message is invalid because I'm young" with "my message isn't taken seriously because I'm young". Just because some/many people will dismiss a statement merely because it passed through youthful lips, doesn't take away from its actual value.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:50 PM
3

Please don't.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:37 PM
0

You implied that it was obvious she was a feminist because she is a lesbian. That's an absurd assumption. Period.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 09:40 PM
0

You're arguing that all/most feminists are lesbians. I even made that assumption for the sake of argument in my last post. My point is that it does not follow that lesbians are all/mostly feminists. This is extremely basic logic. What you're arguing is similar to "all people with penile cancer are male, therefore all males have penile cancer."
/r/MensRights29/07/14 09:33 PM
1

Even if 100% of feminists were lesbians, that wouldn't make 100% of lesbians feminists, as you implied. You're an asshole, and wrong.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 09:27 PM
1

Pretty much useless. Easiest example is that consent can be revoked in the middle of the act. Would only help if the accuser claimed they never touched the condom wrapper, then it would hurt their credibility, but that's not going to ultimately decide anything, and that's the best-case scenario.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 07:47 PM
2

This kind of comment is not welcome here.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:35 PM
2

Links comparing the incidence of roofies to women killing men by poisoning drinks? It would be amusing to have that comparison to make when someone goes on a paranoid rant about roofies.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:48 PM
2

So, the implication by OP is that parents are less careful with male babies?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 03:54 PM
14

Agree or not (I don't think the situation is quite so dire as he claims), he said that he takes that position because he has zero confidence in the system being unbiased, therefore he has doubt, therefore he'll vote not guilty. He says nothing about it being an anti-woman gesture. You do not get to choose others' motives for their actions for them, no matter how abhorrent the action itself is to you. That isn't fair.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:03 PM
1

Well, everything's funny to somebody.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:21 PM
4

Two wrongs don't make a right. Also, charged is not convicted.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:30 PM
4

"Superhero syndrome"? Simply textbook codependency. Googling that can help you find more resources for him.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:09 PM
1

Classy...
/r/MensRights10/07/14 08:09 PM
2

We got a serial rapist on the loose!
/r/MensRights10/07/14 08:04 PM
1

thatsthejoke.rtf
/r/MensRights10/07/14 08:00 PM
3

Link?
/r/MensRights10/07/14 07:57 PM
19

So, let's see what level of outrage comes out of /r/feminism about this story.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 03:25 AM
12

I'm most impressed by dad's ability to bring the plant back to life.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 06:47 PM
1

How bizarre. Good find.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:44 PM
1

I find it morbidly amusing that the end doesn't suggest which of the two types of man demonstrated "our sons" should be taught to be.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:37 AM
2

I'm getting a 404.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 02:33 AM
3

Feminists claim that, but their actions speak louder. When you see them actively fighting the establishment of male-victim-focused domestic violence shelters, etc., you tend to stop believing that feminism is 'looking out for men too'. Not only do you never really see them acting in disadvantaged males' interest, but more often than not, they act against them.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:37 PM
35

May be factual, but not effective, as I can clearly see the "well, men are more violent, that's why" rebuttal already. The comparison of sentences in convictions for the same crime sends a stronger message, I think.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:29 PM
3

That makes no sense. In those statistics, all you needed to do was add in the 4.3 percent. Made to penetrate is now included with a percent. Who cares if it wasn't literally and psychically under the header that said "Rape" on a PDF file. The % is there. That makes no sense. In those statistics, all you needed to do was add in the 4.3 percent. Fermented grape juice is now included with a percent. Who cares if it wasn't literally and psychically under the header that said "Wine" on a PDF file. Th…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 07:26 PM
1

Assistant Licking County Prosecutor Chris Reamer Wow, couldn't get better from The Onion.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:01 PM
31

Until now, Ms Leach has been best-known for her bestselling book Your Baby & Child: From Birth to Age Five, published in 1977. It caused intense controversy by arguing that only mothers can care adequately for their children and that the paternal role is of only secondary importance. Slight bias detected.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:35 PM
110

There's also the fact that, sometimes maliciously, sometimes ignorantly, the MHRM is conflated with the pick-up artist/red piller groups, even when sites like Return of Kings explicitly denounce and distance themselves from the MHRM (and vice versa, to be sure).
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:27 PM
6

The quote about killing infants in large families sounds eugenics-y.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:00 PM
1

Precisely.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 05:02 PM
1

Let's all hold our breath.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:50 PM
2

So pungent FTFY
/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:49 PM
7

Fifteen year-olds want lots of stuff that isn't good for them. This is no excuse.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:33 PM
1

Click the "Why?" link, that's why it's there.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:25 PM
0

Wow, sure proved me wrong.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 07:02 PM
1

most current estimates suggest that between 1 in 4 or 1 in 3 women will be raped during their lifetime Which estimates are those, and how do they define "rape"?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:44 PM
1

Actually, MRAs in general try to hold themselves and each other to a higher standard than this juvenile garbage, hence the downvotes. Grow up.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:34 PM
0

What's the argument? That men are better athletes? What relevance does that have to anything?
/r/MensRights15/05/14 09:48 PM
0

Linking to that article accomplishes nothing. If anything, it bolsters accusations of immaturity from anti-male people. It's not constructive, simple as that.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 09:33 PM
0

'Boys rule, girls drool' is not what the MHRM is about.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 09:05 PM
-10

Check my post history, champ. Let me know how much SRS you find.
/r/PussyPass29/04/14 12:47 PM
-10

Don't you have a quiz to study for or something?
/r/PussyPass29/04/14 11:32 AM
-9

Wow. Do your parents know you're using the computer?
/r/PussyPass29/04/14 11:14 AM
-15

Well now you've provided a fresh post to apply the comment to.
/r/PussyPass26/04/14 02:48 PM
-11

Not constructive or funny. Please stop.
/r/PussyPass26/04/14 02:38 PM
2

How is it not a false accusation when the accused person didn't do the deed?
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:58 PM
1

No, it isn't. It's immature and counter-productive. Unless your goal is not to be taken seriously, it's a mistake.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:46 AM
1

This could do without the condescending tone. Much improved without it, actually.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 05:52 PM
2

If the gag is about what's being simulated, not the stimulation, why is this worse than stimulating stabbing someone to death, for example? Is rape worse than violent murder to you? If not, your logic is inconsistent. On phone, so this is incomplete as a reply, but may add to it later if I remember. That part just stuck out to me.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 06:32 PM
4

Interesting thought experiment: imagine someone was pantomiming acts of violence/murder instead. Is this different to you? Better? Worse? The same? Why do you feel that way? Does it mirror how you feel about the actual acts, on their own and relative to reach other? And does the distance from the person matter in either case? Air humping/stabbing from 10 feet away? Twenty? Fifty? I'm fascinated by this, on an academic level.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:34 PM
13

What the hell is wrong with you two?
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:06 AM
0

Love that joke of his.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 06:30 PM
2

Got a source for this?
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:54 PM
2

I think even the phrase "gave oral sex" is too kind. Could you really treat it like some kind of gift?
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:44 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:06 PM
2

But the SHIZ is unknown.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 02:18 PM
3

No shit condoms vs no condoms make more of a difference. That's like saying that you shouldn't exercise and eat well because jumping off of a cliff versus not jumping off of a cliff makes way more of a difference in terms of your personal health. That's an absurd non-sequitur of an analogy. A more logically-sound analogy would be like saying that exercising and eating right isn't that important, given the hypothetical circumstance that one is significantly more likely to die of violent crime tha…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 09:45 PM
3

Firstly, "dramatically lower" is very misleading. Condom vs. no condom makes way more difference than cut vs. uncut, and implying that HIV shouldn't still be a concern just because one is uncut is straight-up dangerous. And "easier hygiene"? Really? Having one fewer crevice to wash is worth chopping something off? At this point you're advocating surgery for the sake of a minor convenience. Your arguments hold no water.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 08:49 PM
6

The motive is irrelevant. Both are acts of mutilating genital flesh for no medically-sound reason. Hence "genital mutilation". End of story.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 02:43 PM
1

Why wouldn't the same thing be possible?
/r/MensRights06/02/14 05:35 PM
-1

Keep this trash to yourself, and grow up while you're at it.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:53 PM
-4

Stop being an asshole.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:51 PM
40

Get a load of this Well played...
/r/MensRights03/12/13 03:58 PM
4

It wasn't your choice before Facebook existed...
/r/MensRights26/11/13 07:36 PM
1

An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. When does the cycle stop? Why not with you?
/r/MensRights21/11/13 12:21 PM
2

Two wrongs don't make a right. Be the better person.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 05:58 PM
15

Liars. Feminists are all liars. I'm always astonished at how a member of a group fighting against its stereotyping is unable to see the hypocrisy in statements like this.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 05:18 PM
14

Grab some female friends, buy up many cupcakes for 75 cents, then resell them at your own table, also for 75 cents, except for all, not just females. Get any complaints? "I don't know, this seems much more equal than what you've got over there."
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:51 AM
1

It's also quite unlikely that a random on Reddit would make a statement of reassurance like that unless they shared the sentiment they're assigning the victim. Hence my original comment is aimed at him.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:29 PM
1

The one who used 'don't worry, karma will get her back' as reassurance wants it, or at the very least it's assuming that the victim wants it (otherwise it'd be no good as a reassuring statement).
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:10 PM
1

I forgot desire? Did you read what you replied to? I even used that exact word... I'm saying that wanting "karma" to 'get her back' is equivalent to desiring revenge, but wanting someone else to carry it out for you. Lacking the specific desire to take vengeance yourself detracts nothing from my original "two wrongs don't make a right" point?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:58 PM
1

Hoping for "karma" to 'get her back' is just the desire for vengeance minus the ability and/or will to enact it oneself.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:07 PM
4

For you, it's a rape fantasy. For him, it was rape. Difference. Also, the scale of 10 garbage is disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:37 PM
1

I don't think it's realistic or healthy to frame things this way. He needs healing, not vengeance. Two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:20 PM
2

blownkobs Is this a move I'm not familiar with?
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:00 PM
1

On average, after chief executives had a child, they paid about $100 less in annual compensation per employee. A hundred bucks' difference a year? That's got to be within the margin of error, come on.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:48 PM
28

"Propaganda" carries a connotation of being untrue, but it is not false by definition.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 12:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter