TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Clevererer Archive

View 1 post and 244 comments by Clevererer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Anyone calling LLMs random number generators is an idiot, and if they qualify it with "essentially" then they're a weasely idiot.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 03:48 AM
17

"Internalized misogyny" is their catch-all accountability avoiding forcefield.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 04:41 PM
3

There's something to be said for consequences. Boys and men need to face them, so we learn very early on in life to extend a baseline of respect.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 12:07 AM
5

If the framework were consistent, it would collapse and vanish in a pile of dust.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 09:24 PM
12

DEI was a pot of candy we set aside for disadvantaged people. White women saw it and ate it all themselves.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 09:10 PM
21

That's not the situation though. So, no.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 06:28 PM
42

Is that what equality looks like?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 02:48 PM
0

What does the first part of this sentence mean to you? "When all other factors are accounted for, men consistently receive harsher criminal sentences than women for the same offenses." Don't answer yet. I'll highlight the part you need to focus on: "When all other factors are accounted for," What does that part mean to you?
/r/MensRights21/07/26 03:15 AM
2

Is it possible, maybe, just maybe, that they're learning what shame is?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 12:45 AM
0

"After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics" So nope, that's not it. The discrepancy remains. It's real.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 11:19 PM
12

By definition, women cannot rape men. Do you not see how that's a problem with the definition? It's why the stats are so lopsided. It's a glaringly obvious problem. How do you not see that?
/r/MensRights20/07/26 11:12 PM
5

AI is only as good as the data you give it Indeed. And while the context you provided with your pre-prompt instructuons will tailor the answer, it won't change anything about the massive and biased data set the underlying model was trained on.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 09:32 PM
2

Paywalled
/r/MensRights20/07/26 09:30 PM
3

Who contributes to household finances? If it's mostly you, then a divorce will teach you a very painful lesson about how "equal" this open marriage really is.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 01:16 PM
1

It's interesting, and sounds legit, but are there any studies showing men have generally more curiosity?
/r/MensRights18/07/26 04:34 PM
17

This is challenging in the workplace. Studies have shown then people treat men and women equally, they are seen as misogynistic. This is especially true of men. If you expect the same accountability from women that you do of men, all those around you and the woman herself will feel you're treating her unfairly. The baseline for "fair treatment" of women is well above that of men. That's why we have to couch everything we say in softer terms, and make requests and criticism of women less direct. …
/r/MensRights18/07/26 04:27 PM
5

It's the "heads I win, tails you lose" of "internalized misogyny".
/r/MensRights18/07/26 12:39 PM
18

This is Bob Garfield's story https://bullypulpit.substack.com/p/some-personal-news It's long, but a good read. It explains a common scenario where the one man gets bullied by his female (Adj.) coworkers and kicked out the door, because they bullied him. There's even a clip of Brooke Gladstone losing her shit at him, on air, dropping an F bomb at him, on air. And he was fired shortly after that, after she lost her temper. I don't know if Tom Ashbrook ever fully recounted what happened to him. He …
/r/MensRights17/07/26 12:30 PM
5

And where do men learn to become that way? From their female (Adj.) primary school teachers, their mothers, and 90% of their dating experiences with women. You identified a problem, but somehow don't have the strength to honestly seek out the causes. You're a lazy and intellectually dishonest professional.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/26 01:06 AM
39

Bob Garfield and Tom Ashbrook are were two of the best NPR hosts. Both were bullied out of their positions by women to make more room for more women behind the mic. Neither deserved what they got.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 12:56 AM
2

Funny you should mention it! Just yesterday I got a permaban (for not breaking a single rule) from commenting on this gross article in r/technology https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1uwsrwh/the_terrifying_rise_of_schoolboys_making_ai/
/r/MensRights16/07/26 10:20 PM
17

A man child is a slur used to identify a man who isn't upholding patriarchal values. Note that this would typically be something feminism would support, but it's used by feminists as an insult and to the exact opposite effect.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 09:52 PM
12

Except the main difference is this femosphere isn't hidden away in some dark corenr of the internet. It's out in the open, on all platforms. It's a primary theme in acceptable public discourse. None of that is true of the manosphere.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 04:39 PM
17

A Victorian primary school teacher allegedly groomed, indecently assaulted and made a boy sexually penetrate her in the late 1990s, a jury has heard. Look at all those euphemisms for rape. The last one even makes the boy sound a bit like the guilty party. 😔
/r/MensRights15/07/26 06:41 PM
5

Girl, learn to write. My reading is not the problem here. You suck at explaining yourself and that's why all you can come up with are these teenage insults.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 02:30 AM
7

Still waiting for you to finish your thought. All we've seen so far are weak ad hominems and weak hand-wavy bullshit. Put your emotions aside and use your words to explain yourself. You got this, whenever you're ready...
/r/MensRights15/07/26 12:15 AM
3

I guess we can start with the OP before branching out and involving linked sources. That works for me. Anytime you're ready...
/r/MensRights14/07/26 11:56 PM
7

weak, emotionally and intellectually. Can you give examples? Would lobbing insults and running away be considered weak in your book?
/r/MensRights14/07/26 11:37 PM
10

I personally think it was the rise of social media, particularly apps for social media. Actual crime stats have been falling for many years, yet most women active on social media are fed (via algorithms) stories and anecdotes claiming the exact opposite. IMHO social media has done to the minds of many women EXACTLY what Fox News and AM radio did to the minds of Boomers. A constant firehose of reality distorting fear-based content.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 08:18 PM
3

I just finished the first season of The Night Agent. Halfway through I was truly shocked that of the three main bad characters, one was a woman. It was surprising and refreshing to see a woman lead share some of the evilness of the story. Alas, about halfway through the season a new explanation emerged. Turns out, that one bad woman had no choice. She'd been "forced" to side with the evil men in order to prevent an even larger evil. This was an unsurprising plot twist. It couldn't have been less…
/r/MensRights13/07/26 04:23 PM
1

Men can have children, yes, but just like with women, the chance of illnesses increases the older the man is. Pretending this doesn't happen is extremely dishonest. Pretending this is the point is dishonest. OP was talking about something different. The post is still there if you'd like to catch up on it and try again.
/r/MensRights12/07/26 02:39 PM
9

Men still care about equality, but feminists want spite-based revenge that they can bat their eyelashes at and say "That's equality tee hee hee"
/r/MensRights11/07/26 01:43 PM
11

Please share one subreddit that focuses on this core ideology without the rampant misandry. Just one. If this pure and true "core ideology" actually exists, then there's absolutely at least one subreddit devoted to it. Name it. ETA: Fuck off with your disingenuous bullshit, insults, and runaway blocking. Each action more pathetic than the last. Sad I won't get to witness the final depths you reach with that. 😔
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/26 11:22 PM
5

Oh sweetie, that's adorable. pats head
/r/MensRights10/07/26 03:54 AM
17

Emotional intelligence means whatever the woman using it to insult the man needs it to mean in that moment. It's undefinable and entirely subjective, exactly as intended. Great article, btw.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 03:44 AM
12

Sounds like typical feminist word games. Women love pretending words don't mean some things and insisting they mean others, all depending on which is more hurtful to men at that given moment. Another fun word game is insisting that any insult used against women is ipso facto misogyny, as if actual bitches don't exist. They do. Just like dickheads and assholes exist. Only a feminist can perpetually squirm their way out of accountability for using the words they use. In fact, that might be the sol…
/r/MensRights10/07/26 03:42 AM
2

The problem is that most of you judge the entire very complex feminist movement based on female US activists. If we're based in the US, why would we not judge feminism based on feminism as it exists in the US? Of course it's a global movement with varying definitions, that doesn't mean it's beyond critique. That just means women are free and able to change the definition any time they wish, and they do. When you ask an American feminist what rights American women are lacking, they point to abort…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 01:47 PM
9

I haven't seen this yet, thankfully, but I'll be furious when I do. That's absurd.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 04:35 PM
18

It's the same disingenuous word-game motte and bailey that's played with the Patriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 04:34 PM
27

It would fun to see her wake up some day in a world without electricity, plumbing, shelter or a police force. We could all say "Those accustomed to privilege..."
/r/MensRights03/07/26 12:54 PM
15

This is a very dismissive response.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 12:52 AM
3

I'm not the person you asked. 😲
/r/MensRights02/07/26 04:12 PM
5

You're not even accountable for the words you yourself typed. Nobody takes you seriously for that reason alone. Try acting like an adult, when you say something stand by it, and you might get proper responses.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 03:19 PM
2

Can you point to a single feminist subreddit that's not full of rampant misandry? It should be easy. Your alternative is to fuck right off with your sealioning bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 01:34 PM
3

Focus. Stay on topic. I'll ask again: Can you point me to a feminist subreddit that's not full of rampant misandry? If anything you've said is true, this should be easy. There should be plenty and I'm asking for just one. Give us ONE feminist focused subreddit that isn't full of bigotry. This is a very, very simple request. It does not need any clarifying questions (i.e. distractions) from you. It needs an answer. Do you have one or not?
/r/MensRights02/07/26 12:59 PM
9

What "immoral, disgusting, repulsive" behavior are we talking here? Start with her broadcasting of the hateful, bigoted position in the title. That's all three: immoral, disgusting and repulsive. People who can't see that aren't much better, unless they're uneducated. Your other question I already answered.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 11:29 AM
12

Can you point me to a feminist subreddit that's not full of rampant misandry? Just one will do.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 04:14 AM
15

I didn’t ignore it. I was pondering it in broader scope Oh, I'm sure. I wonder how that compares to the number of women who didn’t even think they’d be taken seriously if they had reported it. And after all that pondering, the first thing you do is change the subject? Bull. Shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 04:11 AM
13

You must have missed u/chiarotypical 's reply because it looks like you ignored it. To give an idea of the scale of it, a 2020 YouGov study found that 11% of American men have been falsely accuse of either sexual assault or abuse (ie. child abuse, domestic violence, etc.) That means roughly 13 million American men have been falsely accused of a serious crime. Men were twice as likely to be falsely accused as women. Women were twice as likely to be the accuser. Notably, this survey is considered …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 03:09 AM
17

It does. The biggest issue facing men is feminism.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 03:06 AM
27

You asked for examples. Examples were provided. You said, "No, those don't count." You're getting downvoted and no rebuttals for the same reason: You're a waste of time.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 03:05 AM
10

I'm glad someone else noticed. I felt kinda selfish enjoying all that delicious irony all by myself lol
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:20 PM
12

You just said the exact thing you say you're not saying! 😆 "Vladdy Putin is a man, therefore this wholesale slaughter is A-OK" You: a man started the war and men wrote the conscription laws. Un-fucking-real 🤡 🤡 🤡
/r/MensRights01/07/26 08:32 PM
11

Separating an idealized on-paper goal from what the adherents are actually doing in the real world is disingenuous, dishonest and dangerous. It's acceptable in an academic context, for purely academic reasons and discussions, but it's an absurdly dangerous approach outside these philosophical discussions. What's to be gained by extending this generosity to hate groups? All it can do is lend legitimacy to movements that deserve none. It gives them license to continue spreading hate all while hidi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 08:28 PM
26

The white supremacist movement also has some very milquetoast sounding ideals, like "ensuring our children have a safe and stable future". Sounds fair enough, right? So based on that, would you then support the white power movement? Or would you examine it more closely to see what the actual adherents say and do?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 06:52 PM
96

This is just rebranded "Race Science". It uses and is built upon the identical methodology white supremacists use to justify their hatred and discrimination. Ignoring all the faulty logic behind it, and there's plenty of that, up until the early 2010s it was widely understood (on the left and the right) to be immoral. We all recognized it as disgusting, repulsive behavior. Somehow feminists were allowed to get away with reviving race science. To this day, they're given a free pass from society a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 06:27 PM
81

Should a movement be judged by a simple definition on paper somewhere, or should it be judged based on what the people who identify with the movement actually say and do?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 06:19 PM
22

"Vladdy Putin is a man, therefore this wholesale slaughter is A-OK!"
/r/MensRights01/07/26 12:42 AM
3

Yes, very good point. Not all women are recipients of the otherwise very generous in-group bias. Compared to men though, it's practically universal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 06:04 PM
7

The study is mentioned many times in the images. Dry your eyes and read it again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 01:08 PM
7

Did you read the OP? How would you explain the effect it identifies?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 12:59 PM
-1

😆 No.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 04:50 AM
0

But twice is more than half.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 04:49 AM
24

The perception gap seems easily explained. When a man doesn't get a job, he doesn't get the job. When a woman doesn't get a job, she (in many cases) feels she didn't get it because she's a woman. (It does not matter if the position was given to another woman.) When that woman explains what happened, other women will (nearly universally) agree: It was misogyny. That's why she didn't get the job. If she feels it was misogyny, it is the role of other women to confirm that for her. If all the people…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 03:49 AM
1

The perception gap seems easily explained. When a man doesn't get a job, he doesn't get the job. When a woman doesn't get a job, she (in many cases) feels she didn't get it *because* she's a woman. (It does not matter if the position was given to another woman.) When that woman explains what happened, other women will nearly universally agree: It was misogyny. That's why she didn't get the job. If she feels it was misogyny, it is the role of other women to confirm that for her. If all the people…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/26 11:19 PM
3

Yes, true. We hear it, know it's not true, and feel it as yet another social rejection that we're not allowed to acknowledge. Just add it to the pile!
/r/MensRights28/06/26 02:40 PM
11

Exactly! On one side you have endless gaslighting that "Height doesn't matter, have you tried taking a shower?" and a post like this is simply confirming that the gaslighting is in fact gaslighting. It's the only possible antidote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 12:57 PM
2

Because your question makes zero sense. That's how.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 12:47 PM
4

Headline writers don't want people shouting "INCEL!" at them. Even though most of them are women.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 12:41 PM
11

which is ironic because we live in a day and age where society is constantly shouting to be yourself and open. Men do not hear this message. It's never intended for men.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 12:37 PM
4

Art imitating reality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 06:31 PM
13

No, that's a dumb idea. Was it your own? Because nobody said that. Why did you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 06:28 PM
4

And we have the exact opposite in the West, with boys facing systemic grading discrimination, systemic disproportionate punishments, and systemic discriminatory lack of support. That's what we have now, so why not investigate solutions?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 06:22 PM
1

Yeah, thanks doc. Don't choke on any kernels. I truly hope you have a lovely day. ❤️
/r/MensRights27/06/26 06:09 PM
1

Lol what? Are you standing behind his clearly bogus medical diagnosis? Or did you think it came from a place of genuine concern? He said "touch grass" with more words. You're shooting off in the wrong direction.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 06:06 PM
1

It's disjointed, unedited writing. That's it. Kindly fuck off with the fake armchair "I'm a psikologist" bullshit. 😘 The grating fake "nO i ReallY do care" crap can go as well. Nobody buys it.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 04:11 PM
5

Bernie had broad support, across all demographics. Yet only once his supporters became a "problem" for the DNC, did they get gendered as "Bros". And when the DNC wanted to blame Hillary's loss on misogyny, they started marketing the term "Bernie Bros" as a way to pin her loss on men. Do you see it that way, or do you think Bernie supporters were primarily men all along?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 03:38 AM
-2

The one to my question?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 03:27 AM
-1

Kinda dodging the question Matrix-style here dude.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 03:17 AM
6

Thanks. But why was the movement gendered like that only when it became a scapegoat?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 12:21 AM
2

Like having a conversation with a literal weasel. A weasel covered in grease. Smelly, disgusting grease.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:29 PM
6

I might be misremembering, but didn't the "Bernie Bros" name come about after Hillary lost, and feminists wanted to blame her loss on sexism? So they picked a gendered term for Bernie supporters to make sure only men shouldered the blame?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 11:07 PM
17

Trust it? No, absolutely not. At the same time, it decides elections. So it's not like it can be ignored.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 11:01 PM
4

I've never heard anyone on the left or right say anything like that after a mass shooting. So I'd reconcile the contradiction by saying "Stop making up bullshit."
/r/MensRights24/06/26 05:03 AM
14

I did the math. That's .000000000065% of the female population.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 04:58 AM
6

More race science rebranded as insightful social commentary.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 04:55 AM
17

Because there's something missing from the calculus. It's a word that starts with A and ends with -ccountability. And it's entirely absent from women in leadership positions with power to affect the necessary change. They didn't get to where they are today by admitting, not even once, they might have been wrong.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:06 PM
9

We're describing the same dynamic, just in two different contexts.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:55 PM
49

Yep. This crime has already been pre-pinned on school-age boys and they will pay the price for it for years to come. That's the best way to ensure it keeps on happening, but the desire to blame it on all boys and men will be too strong to resist. It's a done deal.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:10 PM
166

Could the intentional, overt and proudly sexist hiring policies of all-female HR departments have played a role? We may never know.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 09:59 PM
1

That's not true.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:52 AM
6

When talking to a man, every woman alive honestly believes that she personally and she alone has the One True Definition of Feminism. Any legitimate criticism the man makes is instantly labled as Not Feminism, regardless of how many Feminists it accurately describes. The Truth of Feminism in this context can only ever be revealed with extreme condescension and in the most patronizing language possible. If a second woman should enter the picture, her job is to defend and confirm Woman A's Definit…
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:05 PM
5

Sounds great, but does fuck all when you're up against HR.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 10:23 PM
29

A modern hate movement based in spite and vengeance for crimes committed before any of us were alive, brought to you by The More Compassionate Gender ™️
/r/MensRights18/06/26 10:21 PM
1

Stupidity doesn't hurt my feelings, but it does stop genuine discourse.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 04:18 PM
13

You always intentionally look for the worst possible interpretation of every comment in this sub. Why haven't you fucked right off yet?
/r/MensRights18/06/26 03:22 PM
1

We're all impressed by your amazing sentence structure, using one, two and three in sequence like that. Aside from this, it means fuck all.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 02:18 AM
19

"She has a really bad headache, sir. We'll deal with that railroad spike in your skull when we have time. You need to be patient and I'm not going to ask you again."
/r/MensRights17/06/26 01:38 AM
9

some of that fear is justified. It is, but it's their's to manage on their own. Instead they shout it out loudly and often, further perpetuating the bigotry and sexism. Example: If a Chinese person attacked you, you might have a fear of Chinese people. But that fear isn't something you should publicize and shout from the rooftops. It's something you'd fix in private. When women talk of being afraid of men, they're simply spreading their traumas to society. That's immature. It's toxic as hell. It…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 10:34 PM
2

Please don't condescend to vulnerable people.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 07:06 PM
5

I'm vulnerable. You're vulnerable. Everyone is vulnerable. Let's throw out all the laws because vulnerable people shouldn't be subjected to society's rules.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 04:56 PM
7

women created civilisation, they birthed it the same way they birthed you. That's not civilization. Monkeys, birds and ants all give birth. None have created civilization. Learn what words mean to avoid further embarrassment.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 01:34 AM
3

I think what's pathetic is mens complete lack of understanding toward the opposite sex. It's forced down our throats, starting in kindergarten and continuing our entire lives. Meanwhile, few women have even the foggiest notion what it's like to live as a man. You all assume we all live like Brad Pitt and/or Donald Trump. The average man is infinitely more aware of women's issues than the other way around.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 01:33 AM
22

Your obsession with the phrase is making you imagine a meaning that doesn’t exist except in some Hollywood movies. We hear it every day in the news. Left wing news, right wing news, center news... they all use it. They're not Hollywood, technically speaking. And if "non-combatants" is what they mean, then guess what? That is what they would say. They don't, because they're aware of the bias that you seem to want to pretend doesn't exist. But it does, and this phrase is proof of that. Hell some h…
/r/MensRights15/06/26 11:46 PM
15

And further, no woman alive today ever experienced those injustices. But it gets positioned such that it sounds like every womam alive today *is still experiencing them*.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/26 05:45 PM
2

Yes, you're right. You typed up a long, thoughtful reply though. I thought she deserved at least one name-drop poke in the ribs.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 02:43 PM
6

u/Prestigious-Hold-777 did you miss this reply?
/r/MensRights13/06/26 10:11 AM
0

Clearly.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 10:08 AM
10

You're lopsidedly describing an already very lopsided dynamic, fixating on the lesser of two problems, ignoring the much larger problem, all while explaining yourself very poorly. Thanks, but I'm done.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 10:22 PM
12

It's a rare edge case here, while it's literally the defining principle in all the Feminist subs. There's a massive difference.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 10:10 PM
12

a lot of people instead of actually wanting to fix so many problems inherent with our society just want to blame other people [...] for stuff outside of their control. Sound familiar to anyone?
/r/MensRights12/06/26 10:07 PM
10

Ignore her. She only wanted to get in her "you need therapy" insult. You explained yourself very well in your post.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 08:34 PM
3

You've done an excellent job misunderstanding the post that you didn't even read.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 08:33 PM
4

Great observations. Maddening, but insightful. Regarding HR, in my industry (media) I've worked in large corporations that are 70-80% female and observed time and time again that, despite the gender imbalance, HR still gives preferential treatment to female (Adj.) candidates. It's absolutely not about qualifications, either. I've been in plenty of first round interviews, and seen many qualified male candidates just not survive through to the end. I can't prove it of course, but it seems most HR …
/r/MensRights12/06/26 08:22 PM
67

What a hideously hateful introduction. Good on you for writing in. It's disgusting that anyone, let alone an actual news organization, thinks this is acceptable.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 08:12 PM
87

How about the Tea and AWDTSG apps? One bad date, one unhappy spurned woman, and she's free to spread to your city whatever lies she wants, all in private groups, and you'll likely never even hear about it.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 03:37 AM
5

Thank you for this. I noticed years ago how SO MANY of the comics there make no attempt at telling a story or making a joke or even making any kind of worthwhile observation. So many are just "this thing happened" without ANY of the other elements that make people want to read comics. I kept my mouth shut, though, seeing how wildly upvoted many.of the most innane comics there are. So leaving aside all gender issues and whatnot, I'm happy to hear someone agree that most of the comics are just low…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 10:12 PM
2

Well I applaud your psychic powers, but the remainder of your comment doesn't address my point. It sidesteps it. Yes, there's an entire rainbow of social, cultural factors influencing child development. Yes, movies are included there, too. The point I'd made that you seem to have glossed over is that despite the wildly popular dominant narratives, the blame for many core elements of "the patriarchy" falls directly on women's shoulders. Hiding this fact behind wishy washy platitudes is not how pr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 01:45 AM
3

That's awfully generous of you. There's research confirming what many men already knew anecdotally: Most of the "toxic" elements of "masculinity" are enforced on young boys by their mothers and their elementary school teachers, nearly all of whom are women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 12:03 AM
3

Why don't you calm down and try again when you're less emotional?
/r/MensRights05/06/26 01:09 PM
25

Your comment exposes the kind of bigoted thinking that should make you hide your face in shame.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 12:24 PM
5

The version of Feminism that doesn't exist online or in real life might make an appearance, so long as she's given a guilt-free spot on center stage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/26 12:20 PM
1

Spelling, punctuation, grammar and a complete inability to read the room.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 12:15 PM
51

>The Progressive Narrative claims men are simply fragile, sulking because they lost historical privileges and can't handle equality. The thing that bugs me most about this is that, unless you're in your 80s, then you've never lived in a world where men had these privileges. They've been long gone for decades now, and that's fine. But it's downright stupid to assert that any man alive today and under the age of 80 ever knew or expected any of these privileges. Nobody is mourning the loss of somet…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/26 10:54 PM
55

If they were to believe your correction, they'd lose one of the many items on the menu that they use to feed their seething hatred of men. Remember, that seething hatred always comes first. Taking anything off that menu always has an effect opposite to what you'd expect. Like the wage gap myth. You'd think it would be good news to hear it's untrue and that young women have been outearning young men for a long time now. Nope, that just leaves the seething hatred even hungrier.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 10:47 PM
1

And I had been trying to get you to define "problematic numbers" before I realized that you're either arguing in bad faith or just an idiot.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 08:25 PM
2

Nice "accountability" for the position you yourself had taken and support.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 08:12 PM
1

Bad stuff happens. Do we need to redesign our transportation systems everytime something bad happens? How many bad things need to happen before something this extreme needs to be the solution?
/r/MensRights02/06/26 08:03 PM
2

You don't need to say those literal words for your shitty logic to shine through. It's not some incantion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 01:29 PM
12

Applicable, you're just unable to connect two dots even when they're right next to each other. And "unable" is putting it very politely, so you're welcome.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 02:07 AM
49

There’s this microgeneration of boys that were going through puberty around the time of the #MeToo movement, in 2016, 2017, who are now of voting age, of college age, and they have spent their entire adolescence in the shadow of this conversation, which has been framed very much as: Men are predators, men are harmful, men are trash. Much of which is true and so important to talk about.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 12:32 AM
4

Ah my apologies! Well done, madame. You've surprised me twice today and in the nicest possible way. 😊
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 04:31 PM
6

Well done, sir. That could have been viewed as an attack on the underpinnings of your faith, but you recognized it as a difference of opinion and responded with maturity and grace.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 04:01 PM
20

What are you referring to?
/r/MensRights30/05/26 03:05 AM
4

Does the women's participation rate account for stay-at-home moms and wives supported by their husbands?
/r/MensRights29/05/26 08:18 PM
2

Impossible to say. All we know is that many women have this choice and take it. It's not a choice men ever really get, aside from a handful of unicorns.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:06 PM
8

You're all over the place. I don't think you even know what point you're making. Back on topic, OP pointed out a very real asymmetry in marriage and marriage expectations. Do you not have any opinions on the topic, or are just here to detrail with gaslighting distractions?
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:04 PM
14

No one is stopping you from getting out there and finding yourself a rich man or rich woman to bank roll you. That's absurd. You know damned well that doesn't for men the way it works for women.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 01:06 PM
4

M'hm. Let us know what you find.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 03:44 AM
1

The word "civilians" exists. If that was the intended meaning, that would be used.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/26 02:10 AM
1

This is a very well written rationalization. It almost makes the blatant sexism behind the phrase fade entirely into the distance. Well done.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/26 02:03 AM
3

Well, at least she replied with some accuntability.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 12:29 AM
11

You answered neither of my questions. Your emotions clearly got in the way. Why don't you calm down and try again later? (<- That question is rhetorical. That means you don't need to answer it. But the other two questions I asked, please do try to answer those.)
/r/MensRights23/05/26 12:25 AM
13

Ah so much female (Adj.) wisdom coming from you! Have you considered that men and women express frustration differently? Or are you perhaps applying your almighty female (Adj.) armchair psychology dogma onto a situation where it doesn't apply? 🦮
/r/MensRights22/05/26 11:15 PM
16

The concept of centering has replaced the part of your brain that (presumably) used to understand how languages work.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 10:01 PM
14

What I would say that I hope helps at all is that there is more of a history of a lot of men verbally/physically abusing their wives. This is simply not true. Society's perceptions of this are wildly distorted because: A. physical and verbal abuse from wives to husbands has never been counted, reported or even taken seriously. B. A tiny, tiny percentage of (horrific, husband to wife physical) abuses receive all the attention and set the entire narrative for everyone. By focusing on the .01% of a…
/r/MensRights22/05/26 03:59 PM
4

Women gain social standing among hroups of women by saying such things. They're rewarded for it. For.men, it's the opposite.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 09:05 PM
3

It sounds like he's starting to realize that you're the selfish asshole that you're showing yourself to be.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 04:03 AM
2

It is. But what else is there?
/r/MensRights20/05/26 04:00 AM
-2

A woman saying "I'm never harassed" is to femininity what a man saying "I enjoy sucking penises" is to masculinity.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:11 PM
1

A majority of women in the West are simply incapable of even imagining life from the POV of the average man. It's easier for them to imagine life from the POV of a cartoon character, an ant, or a top CEO, but it's impossible to do the same for the average man. It'd be like asking you to imagine life from the POV of a person in a country you know nothing about. It's simply not possible. I like that OP shows some awareness of this problem, just by asking the question. It's a nice gesture. But real…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 06:31 PM
1

You're lying.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 10:36 AM
10

There exists a 2:1 hiring bias in favor of women in tenure-track STEM positions: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1418878112 That's from 2015. It's probably tripled over the last decade.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 08:57 PM
4

What an absurd line of academic no wait scientific no wait objective no wait well-meaning inquiry this is.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 12:20 AM
1

I fear I'm not alone in wondering what this is and, further, what it means or might potentially mean if only the reader could first excavate it from these many alternating layers of sarcasm, legalse and possibly intentionally overblown irony, but maybe I am. r/archeology r/writers
/r/MensRights12/05/26 11:55 PM
1

Haha thanks, dark times require even darker humor. 👻
/r/MensRights10/05/26 03:41 PM
77

Maricopa County? That's known as one of the places that's toughest on crime. She gonna get months of probation! Seriously, entire, whole months!!!
/r/MensRights09/05/26 06:23 PM
7

You need to add in the Tea apps and the "are we dating the same guy" life-ruining gossip groups.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 01:59 PM
8

think part of it has to do with the lack of men going to college. This is a huge part of the problem and it's been getting worse for 30-40 years now.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:48 AM
7

HR doesn't Are you under the impression that there's one universal HR department that every company secretly shares? That's not how it works. Every company has their own HR department. More to the point, in many companies HR is directly involved with hiring decisions.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:47 AM
7

Mark my words: With time it will be worked into physics equations as another universal constant.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 11:57 PM
9

You don't think there are women in HR departments allowing these conversations to influence their decisions? Or government offices? Or in healthcare? Or in academia? These are all fields where women are grossly over-represented. Thinking the online themes aren't affecting real-world decisions is absurd. Unless you live alone on a mountaintop, they're affecting you.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 08:18 PM
21

Also a fan of Taylor and very happy to see her cover this, though I haven't yet watched the whole thing. The problem is, now that the number is out there, it will never go away. All the people posting about it could be forced to watch this debunking 1 million times. After their 1 millionth viewing, they'd immediately go back to claiming the 62 million number is real. Also, btw, you're an incel for mentioning it. Just like the Wage Gap myth, this has entered online feminist cannon and will never …
/r/MensRights06/05/26 06:30 PM
11

Plantation owners complaining that the slaves don't smile enough.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 01:07 AM
1

Other countries do a lot worse. Worse than what Israel has done to Palestine? I'd like to see one or two recent examples.
/r/MensRights04/05/26 04:26 PM
8

What's more important to you: What people say about what they believe, or, how they actually act in the real world? Answer that or don't respond. Those are your choices.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 03:48 AM
9

Feminism is defined by what feminists do, not by some silly slogan that you've been unfortunate enough to swallow and, it seems, have end up lodged in your throat.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 03:05 AM
28

This is why they can't discuss things in good faith because they'd lose every debate. Funny to read this moments after I tried for the umpteenth time...
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:59 AM
1

We could have guessed you were a woman without you announcing it. Your very last sentence makes it very clear.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:24 PM
8

You should try de-dumbing yourself by maybe watching the video.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 07:26 PM
7

I've yet to meet a self-proclaimed feminist online or in real life (and I've met many) who is genuinely interested in gender equality. They all begin by claiming that, but when imbalances against men are pointed out, they ALWAYS wave it away as being retribution for some historical injustice that hasn't existed in any of our lifetimes. Feminism as it exists today is not about equality. It's about spite amd revenge, and every feminist I know gets absolutely giddy and gleeful when it's pointed out…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 04:25 PM
44

Bro as a much older dude I'm so sorry your generation had to live through this toxicity at that age. It's so wrong that teachers, society let it become so acceptable. I was that age in the 1990s and I swear none of this would have been acceptable then. Feels like that was a brief moment in time when nearly everybody (aside from the worst of racists) agreed that we don't judge people by what demographic they're in, but by how they act as individuals. It's wild how quickly we blew past that moment…
/r/MensRights15/04/26 05:31 PM
102

Place your bets now, fellas: Will the feminist academics who created this mess take accountability for it? Current odds are at a trillion-billion to one.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 05:23 PM
163

And none of these opinions are based in reality. Young woman have been given a free pass to be as horribly misandrist as possible online and in social media. There's no mechanism, no conscience stopping it and that hatred fuels itself. Meanwhile in school they're fed plenty of half-truths about historical injustices they themselves have never faced, but that they use ad nauseum online to "back up" their hatred. It's a self-perpeutating cycle with no brakes.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 04:56 PM
1

It wasn't witty. It was ignorant, and included all the hallmarks of comings from a simple, immature and bigoted mind.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:34 PM
4

And the entire kindergarten class applauded her witty reply.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 05:07 PM
220

But have you considered the gender of the person who will shoot and kill them once they're drafted and sent to die in war? /s
/r/MensRights03/04/26 06:49 PM
8

Any woman who gets called a pick-me should wear it as a badge of honor. It means they're a decent human being who avoids stereotypes, as we all should. Any man that sees a woman getting called a pick-me should jump in and support her, pointing out how she's in the right.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 06:45 PM
185

Does Germany have the same lopsided college/university enrollment that we see in much of the west?
/r/MensRights03/04/26 06:42 PM
5

If men can't get a date, it's because they don't shower or wash their clothes. If a man goes on a few dates with a woman amd then stops contacting her, it's not because he's done 100% of the initiating and planning and got tired of zero reciprocity, it's because he's a manchild fuckboi. It's very, very rare that women consider or get called out for their role as half the equation. Entitlement + zero accountability are baked into the equation. Anyone suggesting otherwise is an incel/manchild/fuck…
/r/MensRights03/04/26 06:40 PM
2

Agreed, he's an argumentative schmuck who also sucks at arguing.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 06:33 PM
1

It's the re-normalization of gross stereotyping that, even 20 years ago, all these women would have agreed was wrong.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 06:19 PM
1

I just donated $100, please let me know if you received it.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 01:49 AM
4

The answer to your last few questions comes as one of the most creatively bullshit terms of recent years. They explain all that as the result of, um, coughs, "internalized misogyny" Even their vocabulary is allergic to accountability.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 05:01 PM
24

It's Race Science. That's all this is. Feminists have repackaged all the flimsy methods used by early 20th century race "scientists" and simply pointed them at men. Think about the methodologies of both and how they reach specific conclusions based on broad population-level data. It is 1 for 1 and 100% identical. It's exactly the same. We need to keep pointing this out. Feminists have swallowed race science hook, line and sinker, yet they get virtually no pushback.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 04:32 PM
25

Debates don't work if your opponent can't take accountability for the thing they just finished saying.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 01:38 PM
1

meanwhile that doesnt reflect in what is happening irl. Do you have stats or feelings to back this up?
/r/MensRights16/03/26 10:27 PM
10

I'm sure you do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 10:29 AM
13

The common femcel slur that "many men think washing their asses is gay".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 10:22 AM
10

Sounds like you've had your face in a lot of asses, or you blindly follow the slurs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 10:07 AM
3

100% of gen z women think they're superior to men, but yes that 30% figure sure is concerning.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 05:10 AM
17

Male dating advice: Um, have you tried showering?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 12:30 AM
16

I've thought about this a lot and have come up with an analogy. Let's coin the term "promiscuous femininity". As an academic term, it refers to the *tendency of society to view women as sex objects because of their femininity.* So far so good, pretty harmless as an academic term, right? Now let's see how it's used in reality... Q: Why was that woman assaulted? A: Promiscuous Femininity! or Q: Why wasn't she hired for that job? A: Promiscuous Femininity! When the victim-blaming outrage follows, i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 12:26 AM
9

"Women have always had it worse than men." I've heard white women say this when there were black men in the room.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 10:14 PM
26

That's exactly our problem.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 01:44 AM
55

It's true and that's why I never published my article... Black Women Listen Up! Advice from a White Man.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 01:42 AM
43

Never in a million years. You know what though? Imagine the same segment but mocking women. How would you feel watching it? I know I'd feel shitty and know that it was wrong and unfunny, and I bet you would, too.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 12:36 AM
105

This was a terrible segment. Men's loneliness was mocked and belittled by painting men as sex-doll masturbation champions who don't have social interactions because they think washing their assholes will make them gay. On the plus side, nice to hear Leslie has learned to say her lines without tripping over every third word.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 12:24 AM
–

That's stupid. Nobody said that but you. Don't be stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 01:38 PM
–

Exactly my point: You are in the "too self-conceited" category 😆
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 01:39 AM
0

Only online? That's absurd. Female (adj.) teachers do it in the classroom, giving better grades to girls for the exact same work as boys. This has been studied repeatedly and proven to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 01:16 AM
-5

Why would you intentionally misread OP's post to such an embarrassing degree?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 01:03 AM
–

More like "Everyone settles, some are just too self-conceited to admit they're included in that group of everyone."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 12:59 AM
–

Mature enough to settle, too immature or arrogant to admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 12:58 AM
–

We have a lot more to go on than anecdotes. OP's claim is not coming out of thin air.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 12:45 AM
22

there are many peer reviewed archeological studies that show in prehistoric time 30-50% of hunters were women. Let's see one. Then, show us the studies that said that 100% of hunters were men and 100% of gatherers were women. It will be interesting to see how your souces compare when you fail to provide either 😆
/r/MensRights03/03/26 03:53 PM
10

remember that each human is an individual person That's it. That's all of it. There's literally nothing but this. I was in HS in the 90s. I swear there was a brief moment in time, a few years, but maybe only a few months or days. I feel like I imagined the whole thing now, but I swear I lived through it. There was a point in time when the popular advice regarding all interpersonal, inter-racial, inter-gender.. all the interelations was this. It really is this simple. This is the one thing all pe…
/r/MensRights27/02/26 12:23 AM
1

If women wanted to go to college, they'd be going to college. They should try reading more. ^ That's you in the 1950s.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 11:24 PM
1

I didn't say any of that lol like quite literally none of it, but especially not the last thing. Are you usually better at trolling?
/r/MensRights25/02/26 01:56 AM
1

To approach 1% of female levels. We've been stuck at .01% for a while now, due to needing to work and shit.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 01:43 AM
5

At least she took accountability for her failure... oh wait 😆
/r/MensRights20/02/26 08:29 PM
4

Shocking, right? 😆
/r/MensRights20/02/26 08:21 PM
7

I have contributed. I've pointed out the gaslighting OP mentioned is evidenced right here, by you. And had you not done it so pathetically, like you just sobbed over from the Mean Girls table but in kindergarten, there might be more to say.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 02:13 PM
6

Even your attempts at emotional manipulation are basic.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 11:31 AM
13

Weird. I’m a woman in those ages and my social media isnt pushing those messages. Weird. Never in a million years would you so lazily discount a woman talking about what she sees on social media. But a man does it? Instant knee-jerk dismissal! What the fucks up with that? Save your rambling feels-based answer. It will make equally little sense, and nobody wants to see you flailing around like this.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 03:38 AM
11

That's an incorrect comparison. Of course the right has no shame with their insults. The correct comparison is this: You don't hear guys on the left using sexist slurs to go after Pam Bondi or Caroline Leavitt or any of the other women we're against.However, you DO hear women on the left using sexist language to criticize men on the right. See the difference now?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/26 08:15 PM
11

And I'm saying it's not effective. I'm saying it's harmful, because these insults don't land in a vacuum. And the transparently bullshit reason that you "don't mean all gays. And I don't mean all short guys" is meaningless. If they weren't widely understood to be insults, they wouldn't be used. It's always counterproductive and it's absurd you don't see that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/26 08:12 PM
9

Again, I don't excuse the behavior. Except that you follow this directly with an excuse. You are excusing this behavior, by suggesting it's acceptable for ABC reason. You see that though. I do not think you're an idiot, so you absolute must see something so obvious. It's literally right there in the words you typed. "I'm not excusing this but here's the excuse for why it's ok."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/26 07:06 PM
11

Are you using the insult in private, so only the adversary hears it? Or are you screaming it online, or at protests in front of large groups of allies, some of whom are short?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/26 05:45 PM
10

It's especially frustrating that when you try to call them out, even gently amd nicely like I tried to do here, they just turn around a lie. Take a look at this little convo I had, and how the woman doubled then tripled down that Oh No I Wasn't Mocking His Height! And then the excuse she uses is insane bullshit that nobody could possibly believe. https://old.reddit.com/r/ICE_Watch/comments/1r1kvq6/your_fng_dead_dawg_ice/o4qi5el/ To sooo many wen, men simply aren't people. They couldn't possibly …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/26 03:12 AM
2

You've subscribed to a painfully reductionist narrative, friend. "Women have always had it worse than men," the white woman said to the black man. If you don't see how that's wrong, and toxic, and a gross distortion of history, then please do just run along. But that's the message brown and black boys have been growing up with for decades. I don't like it one bit, and you shouldn't either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/26 07:18 PM
3

So historically, queens were, what, locked up in dungeons? And the wives and daughters of aristocracy, just sent to the mines like peasant men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/26 02:44 AM
2

Dang, best rebuttal I've ever heard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/26 02:43 AM
11

When men don't go to the doctor enough, it's because every single man, entirely independently and all on his own, decides to make a decision that, by pure coincidence and no influence from society, happens to be the same decision made by so many other men. It's a galaxy-level coincidence we may never understand! Meanwhile, women choosing lower paying jobs is never a choice they make, but one which society has forced upon them, and is society's job to correct.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 08:39 PM
1

Nobody has a right to abuse the English language, though, or any language for that matter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 08:13 PM
16

As a man speaking with women, one thing has become very clear over the years: Every woman feels that she, and she alone, decides the One True definition of feminism. No other definition can be allowed to exist. If you as a man have ever heard or seen any different definition from some other woman, then no you haven't, stop lying. You need to support women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 08:10 PM
1

You do know we are on her side I'm always amazed at the arrogance of people who think they speak for anyone but themselves, let alone for half the entire human population 😆 🤣 😂 Like how self-centered can one person get? It's just unfathomable
/r/MensRights21/01/26 11:03 PM
3

Ooo a sea lion! Can you balance on a ball?
/r/MensRights15/01/26 10:27 PM
1

I've always found it hilarious that every woman, genuinely and truly, believes she and she alone knows the one actual and true definition of feminism.
/r/MensRights14/01/26 11:44 PM
1

Aside from you and maybe your husband, absolutely nobody believes that.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 06:45 PM
1

Hey u/Gohanhasuki it seems you somehow missed this detailed comment and then somehow forgot to reply.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:33 AM
3

I don't think this cuntsplanation is very helpful.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:28 AM
1

Then by your definition domestic violence doesn't exist. It's always just "fights".
/r/MensRights08/04/25 11:52 AM
1

So to me that’s a fight not domestic abuse. Why?
/r/MensRights08/04/25 01:42 AM
1

None of us were born in the 1800s though.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 01:03 AM
1

When a woman goes on a first date with a man she thinks “I hope he doesn’t kill me.” Because she watches too much True Crime and has become sexist and ignorant, exactly as people who watch too much Fox News become racist. It's identical.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 01:02 AM
2

This 2% is accounted for more than 50% of the self-harm cases in youth prisons. You're prioritizing self-harm over actual suicides, which are not counted in this stat. Doesn't that make you feel like shit?
/r/MensRights07/03/25 03:02 AM
-3

This, but without the sarcasm
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/25 08:47 PM
3

No silly, I'm the man at the door.
/r/seduction08/04/15 04:25 PM
1

Have you ever woken up to a strange man wearing a fedora, fur coat and lots of jewellery pounding on your door demanding money?
/r/seduction08/04/15 02:35 AM
5

hotel bars Hate to break it to you buddy, but those are prostitutes.
/r/seduction08/04/15 02:07 AM
1

How old are you?
/r/seduction31/03/14 04:14 AM
1

Wow, thank you for the great answer. That makes a lot of sense. I'm curious if you have the same "Just be yourself" cliché in Sweden, or perhaps a different twist on it?
/r/seduction28/08/12 04:25 AM
4

I'm not sure. Seems like you'd come off as this guy.
/r/seduction27/08/12 03:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter