TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cloberella Archive

View 0 posts and 80 comments by Cloberella on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Hahaha, they should make a darker HBO series about what happened after Seinfeld, when Cosmo, now hardened by prison, is unleashed on the world yet again...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/14 02:52 PM
2

I can see your point, but at the same time George faked being disabled to use the handicap bathroom as well as killed his fiance by being cheap and made the parents of his dead fiance trek through the woods for hours looking for the cabin in the Hamptons he made up. I mean, I get that sometimes he showed good emotions too, but while Jerry and Elaine were largely apathetic which would result in someone being hurt due to lack of action on their part, George actively did bad things and when he did …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/14 02:29 PM
3

That's how Seinfeld was too. Subtler, but seriously, George is a huge turd of a human, and Jerry and Elaine really aren't far behind. Cosmo was just insane, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/14 08:20 PM
2

I'm a late-twenties east coast girl and I also have never seen this attitude (aside from the father of my ex, who literally ordered a bride from panama out of a catalog he showed us). Usually when someone I know brings home a gf or bf from another country, or even just another region of the US, they're met with friendly curiosity and usually seen as something mysterious, special and interesting. If anything, I would say they get far more positive attention than negative.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 04:18 PM
1

There are certain advantages and disadvantages to being members of different genders? You don't say. There are pros and cons to being both a man and a woman? Shocking.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 04:09 PM
2

Read the rest of the blog entries, it's a joke. She has articles like "how to get the gay son you always wanted" "how to lose 25lbs in one day" "how to ditch your elderly parents" etc.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 03:43 PM
1

Ditto.
/r/MensRights01/04/11 06:42 PM
1

And like I said... Yes, like YOU said. Not like she said, or like anyone else said. Just what YOU want to believe, even in the face of statements otherwise. I'm pretty sure most of the people here do not want other people thinking for them, or assuming that their wants/needs/desires are contrary to what they explicitly state. I'm glad you're comfortable thinking for other people, and not listening to what they say to you, but I am not that big of an asshole, so I prefer to take people on their w…
/r/MensRights01/04/11 12:59 AM
1

This is your belief, because you believe you are infallible at reading in between the lines, and that it in your own words: Most people don't know what the fuck they're thinking. I tend to know pretty damn well. and therefore you believe yourself capable of knowing both what the man really meant when he said he wanted to be a father, as well as what the woman really wanted, when she said she did not want the baby. Most rational people look at the facts presented by the witnesses, listen to what …
/r/MensRights01/04/11 12:54 AM
1

Look throughout the rest of the thread and her replies to comments, she has repeatedly stated she did not want the child at first. In fact, she has directly replied to you stating so. You go to the doctor first to make sure you are pregnant, before you scare the shit out of the guy. That is common sense. You are looking for discrepancies and only providing examples of perfectly rational behavior.
/r/MensRights01/04/11 12:47 AM
1

You do not know that. You are assuming that because you seem to believe that all women want children and that it is impossible for a woman to pass up the opportunity to have a child. Both of those statements, however, are false.
/r/MensRights01/04/11 12:45 AM
1

Yes she did, that is what she has told us. To think otherwise is to make up facts based on what you clearly want to believe, rather than the information that has been provided for us.
/r/MensRights01/04/11 12:44 AM
1

No, this is what you clearly want to believe even in the face of evidence that suggests otherwise.
/r/MensRights01/04/11 12:44 AM
1

Well when your fellow MRAs are telling you to lie, and use illogical, disingenuous arguments, and you stand up against them, despite your opinion being unfavorable to them, that deserves to be thanked. SO thank you :)
/r/MensRights31/03/11 10:05 PM
1

You, sir, by your own admission, are hostile and irrational. Nothing you say carries any weight any more. How founded or unfounded our bullshit is, is not of concern to me [...]calm and moderate dialogue has gotten the MRM absolutely nowhere. Be hostile and irrational ...
/r/MensRights31/03/11 10:02 PM
1

That's ok, you've also admitted in several of your posts that you lie, are irrational and are intentionally hostile, but do not care whatsoever about the legitimacy of your arguments. Therefore, everything you say is immediately undermined, and pretty much invalid. To quote you: How founded or unfounded our bullshit is, is not of concern to me [...]calm and moderate dialogue has gotten the MRM absolutely nowhere. Be hostile and irrational ...
/r/MensRights31/03/11 10:01 PM
1

Yeah sorry about that, I thought you were SnarkTom. (Finally went back and figured out who said what, again, very sorry!)
/r/MensRights31/03/11 08:39 PM
1

Thank you :)
/r/MensRights31/03/11 08:33 PM
1

She is not incorrect in that statement. She cannot change her mind about giving birth to the baby any longer. The baby will be born regardless. She might be able to give it up but she will at least be the child's birth mother of record forever. She is forced into being a parent, whether she chooses to keep it, or not, regardless. Had he been honest and upfront in the first place, she could have chosen to abort, and not be "stuck" with being the mother of a child (whether or not she parents the c…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 08:16 PM
1

I'm sorry, I actually confused you with someone else who admitted that they have not been reading the posts before replying. You are correct, I made an error, I am sorry. I am at work and am replying quickly and being careless about looking at who I am replying to, that is my fault. I am not arguing that she is "powerless", that might be her statement, though I did not see her state it anywhere. She is however, stuck carrying the child to term. She may not be stuck raising it, but she is stuck i…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 07:59 PM
1

Here I quoted myself to save you the trouble: Adoption is not the same thing. It's not nearly as easy to get rid of a fully formed, living, breathing, human that has grown inside of you for 9 months, that you have felt kick, and you have heard cry, and you have see up close, and realized "This is a person I have just made", as it is to flush out some bundle of lifeless cells a few weeks after conception. What you are asking her to do is far more traumatic. It will result in her suffering with li…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 07:49 PM
1

I have already stated how giving up the child for adoption is not the same as having the option for abortion (which he deliberately took away from her by lying about his intentions). I know you have stated that you don't really care to read the arguments thoroughly before responding, but I suggest you do so, I am getting tired of repeating myself.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 07:47 PM
2

You keep acting as if the OP is the Queen of all women. I'm sorry, what did you expect her to do? Call the President and have him declare gender and reproductive equality for all? She did everything in her power to make things as equal as they are given the laws of the country that we live in, that she had no part in creating, and the state of human reproductive biology as we know it, again which she had no part in creating. It is near impossible to make things completely equal when one party ha…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 07:36 PM
3

This is an invalid argument. All women are not connected, we are not one big machine. You cannot punish all of us, by punishing one of us. It is illogical to say that because in the past men have been wronged in this way, it is ok to wrong a woman who has was innocent in this case, in the same manner. It is, in fact, the definition of hypocrisy. This is the same type of logic that is used to justify things like the hiring of women over men. In the past women have been treated unfairly and passed…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 07:33 PM
3

Yes, it is set up that way, never argued that it wasn't, in fact, conceited several times, that the SYSTEM is unfair. However, the OP cannot change the way the world works in a mere 9 months to make the situation more fair. Instead, she did everything she could to make it as fair to him as possible, by keeping him informed at a very early stage, presenting all the options to him, having an open dialog with him about how to proceed, and giving him a CHOICE in the matter, which is all she could re…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 07:14 PM
5

It's two sides of the same coin. Pressuring someone, male or female, to do something they do not want to do, comes from a place of selfishness, and not love. Women pressure for commitment (although not all) and men pressure for sex (again, not all), they're both equally as bad. If you love someone, you will never try and pressure them into doing something they are uncomfortable with, that's common sense.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 07:09 PM
1

I wrote a blog entry on OkCupid (yeah I know, groan) about this... Moreso about guys freaking out that I prefer men over 6 feet tall. Here is an excerpt from the blog entry: For the record, I don't think twice when a guy tells me that he is an ass man, not a boob man, and that my tits are too big. Or when a guy tells me I'm too short, or too fat, or too pale, or too tattooed, or too anything, for his tastes. I recognize that people have a 'type' and you simply cannot be everyone's type. The prob…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 07:01 PM
1

Yes, he did. That's why I said "Since you brought up Psychology", he boasted that he was well trained in the art of psychoanalysis and that his argument was based upon a competent psychoanalysis of the OP based on his fine understanding of how humans work. Edit: I understand human psychology and have made my diagnosis. The idea of events playing out exactly as the original poster has claimed is an absurd idea completely in conflict with how human beings actually behave. If you do not understand …
/r/MensRights31/03/11 06:51 PM
6

It's not, but in this case, the OP did everything possible to give him rights and make things fair. She informed him with plenty of time to go that she was pregnant. She gave him the option of abortion. He made the choice to become a father. He then backed out, after it was too late for her to do so, effectively stripping her of her rights, by allowing her to make her decision under false pretenses (in this case, that he would be there to share the emotional and financial burden of parenthood). …
/r/MensRights31/03/11 06:47 PM
1

I'm just responding to his claims that his psychoanalysis is more valid than anyone else's. Anyone can claim to be an expert on the internet. Illogical conclusions, with a supposed background to back them up, doesn't make them any less illogical.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 06:45 PM
1

I understand what you're saying, but even if that's true, even if she had a feeling that he did not want to be a father, you cannot make life changing decisions for other people based on your intuition alone. She might have thought that was the case, but if he insisted he wanted her to have the baby, then the only reasonable course of action was to take him at his word. Reverse the situation, and see if you still feel that women should instinctively make reproductive decisions for men based on w…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 06:39 PM
2

The word "all" was implied, look up the rules of grammar if you don't believe me. You would have had to qualified the group term "women" which refers to, by default, ALL women, with "some" "most" "a few" etc. Sorry, buddy, you are the one who fails here. Also, no, that's not what I'm saying. Look through my comment history, you'll find several places where I come down on the side of men. In fact, I most recently replied to a feminazi with "you were wrong, admit it, accept it and own it." I am fo…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 06:36 PM
1

Yep, same goes for RN and his analysis of the OP, so unless he's willing to admit his analysis is equally bullshit, then he can't really pick apart mine....
/r/MensRights31/03/11 06:35 PM
2

This is not true. All women are not completely dependent on men, and some men are completely dependent on women. I currently support myself, work full time and don't even have a boyfriend, let alone a husband to siphon money and support out of. However, I was once engaged to an unemployed man who needed me not just for financial support, but as a place to live (yes, he was 26 and if he hadn't moved in with me, would have still been living with his parents). Some people are lazy, greedy, gluttono…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 06:12 PM
19

Howdy, I'm a fellow female. You were wrong. Face it, accept it and own it.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 06:04 PM
8

Women's Studies classes are nothing more than a huge, infuriating waste of time. First of all, wtf, separating the genders out like this only feeds the perceived inequality. "We're so equal we have to have a separate class to study our history!" Put the study of men and women together, we're all the same race, you don't need to separate out one group from the other, just ya know, call it "human studies", or idk, ANTHROPOLOGY and stop this silliness. Secondly, the women there all have chips on th…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 06:02 PM
0

Why is that not a valid reason? If a couple are about to have kids, and the mother decides to abandon the baby the day after it is born, the father doesn't have a right to say "I no longer want this child, I was only willing to parent becuase she said she would be there with me"? Her saying she kept the child because he agreed to co-parent, is reasonable. It is not just some excuse, it's what happened. She told him she would not have an abortion on the condition that she would not have to be a s…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:51 PM
1

A woman knows that if a guy does not say "woopee I have a kid" that he is not really "on board". I'm a woman, no we don't. Maybe I'm crazy, but I take people at their word, I don't attempt to second guess them, or undermine what they are telling me by assuming I know them, their life, and their mind, better than they do. I will NEVER assume I know better than any other person, this includes men, when it comes to what their own personal and private thoughts are. You want me to know how you feel? …
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:47 PM
1

He shouldn't have thought he could run away from his problems. By vanishing he passively left the decision in her hands, that is on him. If he did not want the child, he should have said to when she gave him the opportunity. She also most likely, from the timeline presented, could not have aborted the child at that point. If we're going to play your favorite game, the "fill in the blanks" game, then this is probably the most likely scenario: J's religion says abortion is wrong. J's gf gets knock…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:37 PM
1

Adoption is not the same thing. It's not nearly as easy to put a fully formed, living, breathing, human that has grown inside of you for 9 months, that you have felt kick, and you have heard cry, and you have see up close, and realized "This is a person I have just made", as it is to flush out some bundle of lifeless cells a few weeks after conception. What you are asking her to do is far more traumatic. It will result in her suffering with life-long guilt over if she made the right decision, if…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:30 PM
1

Almost as big a pain as dealing with crazy people who think they're brilliant. ...this must be what watching FOXNews is like.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:18 PM
3

No, she wanted it after she had been carrying it for 7 months. That is ENTIRELY different than wanting it in the first place. It is one thing to get rid of a lifeless bundle of nerves, it is another to abandon a complete living human being of your making to total strangers. The two decisions really are not analogous. We are no longer talking about a fetus, now we are talking about a human being that is going to be born, and brought into existence no matter what. We are no longer talking about th…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:11 PM
2

How do you know it was under duress? She stated she was pregnant, and wanted an abortion. He could have said "yes, please" at that point. HE decided to say "no, abortion is morally wrong, I guess we're going to be co-parents", that is on him. You are trying to absolve him of any responsibility in this. That is not how life works. Just like she is partially responsible, so is he, no exceptions. The only evidence of either of them not wanting the child from the get-go, comes from her. She did not …
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:09 PM
1

Both should be held accountable for their actions in all scenarios, which, includes this man. P.S. Some men actually want to have kids, and some women actually don't.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:07 PM
2

Continued from Pt. 1 above: The fact stands that a good woman who believes in abortion would >never have kept the child after the guy disappeared unless she >believed her own feelings about the matter were more important than >his feelings and the future of the child. Given that information, I can >conclude everything else. I'm sorry but this statement doesn't make any sense. I'm not even sure what it is you're trying to say here. A good woman who believes her partner to be an adult capable of m…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:54 PM
3

THE EVENTS AS TRANSCRIBED DO NOT MAKE SENSE. To you, because you clearly have a need to believe that no woman would ever keep a baby because the MAN was opposed to abortion. The OP is telling things from her own view point, and she knows very >well that she's not being completely truthful. She is saying what she >WANTS to believe and hoping people will come to her defense. You have no basis for this, whatsoever. You do not know what the OP is thinking, and you do not know if she is not being tru…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:54 PM
5

Doesn't really matter, by the time he disappeared, she couldn't legally abort the child, wtf did you expect her to do, throw herself down a set of stairs or stab herself in the stomach?
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:07 PM
3

That is AFTER he said he would help take care of it. She wanted the baby under the condition she would not be a single parent. He agreed to this condition, then backed out. THAT is the problem. She is now stuck being a single parent, a life that she would not have chosen had he not made promises he was unwilling to keep.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:05 PM
8

He opted out AFTER she could no longer do so herself. He strung her along just long enough to take abortion off the table, because he was morally/religiously opposed to it. Now that she HAS to give birth and cannot "sin" by having an abortion, he's walking away. How is this fair?
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:02 PM
3

The ONLY explanation that makes sense to you, is that the OP tricked the man into having a baby, and now regrets it? It's not AT ALL possible, that the man tricked her into having the baby, and now HE regrets it? Not at all? EVER? Fuck, men, women, whatever, PEOPLE MAKE MISTAKES, HAVE REGRETS AND OFTEN MAKE PROMISES THEY CANNOT KEEP, GENDER NOTWITHSTANDING.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 03:57 PM
2

You are filling in the blanks with the most reasonable explanations FROM YOUR POINT OF VIEW, which is clearly working off of this assumption "Women always lie". Regardless, in the absence of proof otherwise, you have only what she says to go off of. You could fill in the blanks with whatever you want, opening all possibilities. Maybe he's secretly a space alien and now is afraid that his genetic code will create a super race that will wipe out all humans... after all there's nothing in her post …
/r/MensRights31/03/11 03:49 PM
8

despite anything he may have said Women are required to be psychic? You realize you just said that women should not listen to what men say, but instead go based on what they think they mean.... Is that really what you want? Let's reverse the situation "He said he doesn't want a baby, but then I caught him looking at pictures of his friends kids and sighing. Clearly what he really wants is to have children, so I'm going to get pregnant now, since I cannot trust him to say what he is really thinki…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 03:42 PM
3

tigerblood!
/r/MensRights31/03/11 03:40 PM
6

I believe you, I in fact, have had a female friend who kept a child becuase the father of the child was Catholic, and preferred fatherhood to abortion. Luckily for her, though he seemed to regret the decision the first few weeks after the child was born, he came around and has been an exceptional parent ever since.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 03:29 PM
3

To believe that the events playing out as the OP stated must be completely made up and 100% absurd, is to show an extreme bias on your part. Refusal to accept that, says a lot about the sort of person you are, versus the sort of person you believe yourself to be. You really believe it is impossible for a man (or HUMAN) to change his mind? To go a few months and then think "oh shit, what have I done?" and back-peddle? You think it's impossible for a man (HUMAN) to like the idea of having another …
/r/MensRights31/03/11 03:20 PM
3

It's one thing to abort a fetus before the first trimester, it's another to give up a child after 9 months of carrying it, with all the hormones coursing through your body telling you that it is your biological imperative to care for the baby. It is no where near the same decision, nor is it nearly as simple, to give a living breathing human being over to strangers and trust them to care for it as if it was there own, as it is to flush a few cells out of a body before they develop into a person.…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 03:15 PM
4

How did he not choose? He said to her that his religious beliefs precluded abortion, she said that she would still abort unless he wanted to help raise the child, he said he did, so she chose not to abort, because HE SAID HE WANTED TO HELP RAISE THE CHILD. He then changed his mind once it was TOO LATE for her to have an abortion, now she is TRAPPED with a child she cannot afford on her own. She may love the child now, because she's had 8 months and lots of hormones to help her bond with the unbo…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 03:10 PM
3

What makes you say that? Where is your proof? Did you talk to the other guy? You currently are behaving in a manner that i have seen you criticize women for. Do you not feel hypocritical? You are assuming she is lying 100% with no evidence to the contrary. If that is ok in this case, why is it unacceptable when the cops/society take the woman's side in domestic abuse, or false rape, claims, without any proof, and assume the guy is 100% guilty? Are women the only humans capable of lying, deceivin…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 03:02 PM
6

Did you read the post? She wanted an abortion and HIS religious views were against it. She was still going to have the abortion, but HE insisted he wanted to help raise the child, so she agreed to carry it to term. Then he backed out AFTER abortion was no longer an option! In fact, she even pointed out she had aborted a pregnancy in the past, clearly she would have done the same this time if it hadn't been for HIM stating he wanted the child.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 02:06 PM
1

As a woman who has no desire to marry, I really don't see what either side gets out of the arrangement, other than potentially locking themselves into a contract that is damned near impossible to amicably break. Marriage is out dated, and quite frankly, unnecessary at this point in time. A piece of paper won't make someone more faithful to you, nor will it cause them to start loving you. The only things that come out of marriage, that I feel a couple with the intention of raising children actual…
/r/MensRights21/02/11 09:38 PM
2

Huh... I thought my roommate was clever and original when he updated his FB status with this. Guess not.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 09:32 PM
2

There is no way to define what makes a man, or what makes a woman. We're all people, everyone is different, and we shouldn't be made to feel as if we have to conform to a predetermined list of qualities, just to consider ourselves the member of one gender, or another.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 09:10 PM
1

Most of the women I know that are in the military have been clamoring for equality and the ability to enter combat for quite a long time. The opposition has been from men who don't think women can fight (feel they would be a liability), and men who think women belong in the home and drafting them would leave children without a caretaker. Mostly republicans/conservatives who say stupid things like menstruation is a "disease" and can cause unhygienic conditions in foxholes that will make male sold…
/r/MensRights16/01/11 01:29 PM
1

Nope sorry, not even sure what l4d is.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 01:25 PM
1

It's funny... these comments make it seem as if it was women that were against allowing females to enter combat, rather than male politicians being the main opposition to this.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 07:54 PM
1

Where in the US do you live? I work for a nonprofit agency that provides home based workers to disabled children (usually autistic). We specifically seek out male workers because we want our kids to have strong gender appropriate role models, and boys are more often diagnosed with autism, than girls, making our client base mostly male. Our male workers are usually left alone with the children, and perform daily tasks (where the children are often nude, or exposing themselves), such as potty trai…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 07:44 PM
2

This is terrible, it is awful, but it's not because women are terrible and awful. People are. His wife was a bad PERSON. In this case the odds are in her favor, and she's working them, just like the opportunistic human she is. It's not because she's from Venus and you all are from Mars. Just like when some asshole husband beats his wife to death, or gives her an STI, or makes time with the babysitter, it's not because he's a man, it's because he's a human, and humans on a whole, are really shitt…
/r/MensRights13/10/10 01:27 AM
3

No I understand you're not trying to claim that harassment doesn't exist (either from men towards women or vice versa), I guess I just didn't think false accusations happen all that frequently. Even when a guy has been inappropriate towards me, I usually just limit my interaction with that person, or tell them very plainly any further advances are unwanted, and they usually get the hint. The only time I've ever actually taken any action, I had a legitimate stalker who was repeatedly breaking int…
/r/MensRights08/10/10 06:31 PM
2

Honestly, I don't know. I'm not the sort of person to make those kind of accusations unfounded, and often brush off the sort of thing other women I believe would make a stink about (for example my married boss making me a mix CD and giving me a bottle of wine for Christmas he asked I hide from my other female coworkers). It seems completely insane to me that people would kick up a stink just for funzies, or put themselves through the physical and emotional exhaustion of a law suit just for the p…
/r/MensRights08/10/10 04:35 PM
1

So women are individuals with diverse, unique tastes, thoughts and opinions of their own that don't necessarily correlate to one another or any/all other members of their sex, and who's behaviors can't be nailed down into a predictable set of patterns dictated by something as superficial as their gender? You don't say. Maybe we should stop looking at people as either male or female and start seeing people as... well, people, each with their own unique set of views, thoughts, wants, needs, likes …
/r/MensRights08/10/10 04:16 PM
1

Idk dude, I'd think you'd be more likely to get weird accusations and rumors started at you for openly carrying surveillance equipment than for just following the rules and minding your business. I don't think it's right, but doing something like that will set you apart, make people wonder what you're trying to hide/prevent/protect yourself from, if you have a history of getting into easily misinterpreted situations, if you've been accused of wrong doing before, which will then morph via the tel…
/r/MensRights08/10/10 03:59 PM
1

Hehehe I'll keep that in mind ;) :p
/r/MensRights05/10/10 03:52 PM
2

Wow over reaction much? Lighten up guy, you're almost as bad as the damn feminists.
/r/MensRights05/10/10 03:28 AM
1

Thank you, this is what I said!
/r/MensRights04/10/10 09:50 PM
6

Hey now, there are sane chicks out there, but with an attitude like that, none of us are gonna want to play with your naughty bits ;) :p
/r/MensRights04/10/10 09:50 PM
7

Easiest way to avoid all this? Don't stick your dick in crazy.
/r/MensRights04/10/10 06:26 PM
1

Oh sorry dude, I misread and thought you were a junior in college, that would make you older. If you've just turned 18 your mother should give you some slack. Yes you should still probably get a job and get ready to move out, but she shouldn't be forcing you out the door immediately. She's not entirely wrong but her methods are a bit much so soon.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 05:07 PM
1

Your mother is right, you need to get a job. Many people work while in school, some people work more than one job. If you can't hack the stress of school and part time work now, you'll never manage a full time career in the future. Life isn't easy and the world doesn't allow you summers to decompress and relax, in less than two years you will be in the work force, and you will be working at least 40 hours a week 50ish weeks a year or more... get use to it or you're going to end up living at home…
/r/MensRights18/07/10 02:00 PM
12

Do you know how difficult it is to find a work from home job that pays an adequate amount? I live alone and can't find a reasonable one to support myself on, let alone children. As for volunteering... sure, when the kids are older. Babies and toddlers will only inhibit any volunteer efforts. Kids under 10 or so for the most part would be more of an hindrance than a help, no matter how 'right' you've tried to raise them. Young kids simply don't have the attention span or understanding for most vo…
/r/MensRights08/07/10 09:04 PM
31

As someone who was raised by a nanny, shuffled between babysitters, and eventually a latch-key kid at the age of 9 in charge of her younger sibling... if a parent can afford to stay home with their children, they should. There's nothing wrong with being a working parent, but infancy to age 4 are some of the most important years in a child's life, and it never hurts to have a parental unit readily available to you when you're a small child either.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 07:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter