TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Clockwork_Prophecy Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by Clockwork_Prophecy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

This is absolutely not the first time you have taken an expression as literal even when that interpretation made no sense in any context. The "srs" thing is the most recent example. It comes across almost like autism or something.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:14 PM
-1

You have this really weird obliviousness to humor and subtext.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:05 PM
-1

I SAID "GOOD DAY" MA'AM!
/r/MensRights12/04/13 07:58 PM
0

Since you are not showing any tangible attempts to challenge your own thinking, and you never really did, I'm just going to leave you with a few tips that will help you out if you stick around reddit. You will see the phrase "Big L" and "Little L" around. You are only talking about the Libertarian Party if you are capitalizing it (Notice I never did). When you are discussing the libertarian philosophy, it stays lower case. Most libertarians are not members of the Libertarian Party. Your personal…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 07:06 PM
-1

You don't read the news much, do you? Man, complaining about logical fallacies, and now you open up with one. His formal paper is behind a pay wall, but his TED lecture covers the major points. Human kind is less violent now that it ever was. Gallup does some great work on national crime in the U.S. The third graph will show you that violent crime is currently in the middle of a free fall that began almost 40 years ago. However, like you, many people actually think that crime has gone up. I thin…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:16 AM
-1

In other words, you're looking at "Hey, this isn't working" and coming up with the response "well, then, we should do it bigger and more, and that will fix the problem." The difference between you and me is that you're hung up on your ideas - I deal in the reality that your idealism doesn't address. If you are convinced that the U.S. is not a safer, wealthier, and more equitable place now than it was in the last two centuries, you have no right to be lecturing anyone about "reality". It is appar…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:27 PM
-1

This is a false statement. There are homeless in the U.S. who starve, unassisted by the programs you promote. Yes, because there is still a ton of work to do when it comes to creating a more equitable society. The difference between you and me is I'm actually trying to make it happen while you're indulging in a fantasy. As I mentioned before, I've been destitute. I listened to people who told me I had to have medical insurance because of my child. I applied for, and was approved for medicaid, an…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 04:59 AM
-2

You make it very clear that your knowledge is focused only on short spans of history, either due to the choice to ignore, or the ignorance of, other times. Uh, no. starvation was a facet of life in the U.S. for it's entire history up to the establishment of those programs. It was worse in some times than others because famines, droughts, and other disasters took their toll of lives. The U.S. still has famines and droughts of course, they just don't cost any lives anymore. In the meantime, if you…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:08 AM
1

Yeah, depending on perspective. As in, the word would apply correctly to someone who believed that fairness meant everyone could see the game. If you want to get picky with semantics, you need to pick a word that is more precise to begin with, because "equity" isn't.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:40 PM
13

We are talking official English dictionary meaning here. You are trying to apply a specific meaning to a broad concept that is defined by context and perspective. Your definition in your context could fit within the definition of equity, but claiming it is the exclusive definition just makes you wrong. His use of the word equity was not exclusive, making him more accurate than you from a logical standpoint.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:33 PM
6

That doesn't pan out in real life - people with the desire and initiative to do so have proved the "level the field" philosophy wrong, and will continue to do so, by elevating themselves without taking anything away from anybody. You make it very clear that you have no concept of history and the benefits we enjoy relative to the past. Before we had school lunches and food stamps, a significant amount of the U.S. population suffered from deformities brought on by malnutrition. Deformities like ri…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:22 PM
19

From a technical (standard English dictionary) standpoint, his definition is more correct than yours.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:55 PM
23

The Onion satirized this weird (and I agree, insulting) idea that everyone is supposed to face cancer like they're the protagonists of a after-school special.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:29 AM
1

If 'against society' means 'for accuracy against moronic generalisations of large swaths of largely-unrelated peoples', Yeah see, this is what I meant. I'm a very socially progressive person, but this color blindness regarding biological differences is just silly. Those differences lead to a more vibrant and flexible world, but there are differences nonetheless. White knighting' is exclusively used for males stepping in to 'protect' females, mistakenly thinking it will get them cunt. Considering…
/r/MensRights29/11/11 03:26 AM
1

Speaking of projection, I don't really feel like you're talking to me, so much as you're taking a White Knight stand against society...
/r/MensRights29/11/11 01:34 AM
0

I'm not going to deny it's more nuanced that that, although some parts are less nuanced than others. Obviously there are significant differences between even the local populations. Not all of it is very nuanced, though. Bone mass in African Americans is higher than in other populations. Studies at Brookhaven National Laboratory used radiographic absorptiometry and in vivo neutron activation analysis to show that bone mass in African American adults is ≈10–15% higher than in other populations thr…
/r/MensRights29/11/11 12:59 AM
7

There's no difference physically between black people and white people Biologically, there are indeed differences. Testosterone levels, bone density, and developmental focus on different muscles are among the more obvious ones.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 06:16 AM
10

That is a pretty impressive collection of false correlations.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 05:58 PM
10

What if the guys on the side has an STD? You think politeness trumps a potentially permanent medical condition?
/r/MensRights04/05/11 12:59 AM
9

Phillips is representing himself in the case. All legitimate excuses and outrages aside, this was really stupid.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 02:31 AM
2

BUT IS STILL FORCED TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT. There should be public records available online for the case.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 02:27 AM
1

Yes there are types that have a natural charisma, but too often the assumption doesn't land on what you consider to be natural. More likely is the relations the insecure-aggressive and the secure-passive. I'm not arguing that Alpha males don't exist and don't serve an important role, I'm saying the definition is broken. People who are secure and confident don't go around starting fights and they don't mindlessly protect things they don't want. Those that do have failed to understand their own co…
/r/MensRights30/10/10 03:04 PM
3

The term Alpha doesn't really have meaning. No one who fits the 'definition' would actually call themselves that, and the males that do are obviously using the term to 'pump' themselves out of their own insecurities.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 01:06 AM
3

Bundle the paperwork with the check. That's how my city got disability frauds to finally acknowledge receipt of the paperwork ordering them to get a new doctor's evaluation.
/r/MensRights14/10/10 11:46 PM
3

It comes up a lot here. He means legal emancipation, not a say in whether or not she has the baby. As in - she has no right to demand support payments if he doesn't agree to be a father. It's her baby as it always was and still is, but she has no right to make the choice for both parties.
/r/MensRights30/09/10 03:08 PM
3

My response to her on the board (unpublished, naturally) was "Misogyny as a self-fulfilling prophecy".
/r/MensRights30/08/10 06:16 PM
26

I don’t tolerate it, but I am also aware that a day will come when I can’t control it anymore; when I will have raised a monster despite my efforts. It is the hardest conflict in the life. Not that my angst will bring much comfort to the women he will grow up to oppress. ...From the mother of a two-year-old boy. He should be removed from her care NOW. Not that she'd probably even mind.
/r/MensRights29/08/10 11:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter