TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CloudGuide Archive

View 0 posts and 58 comments by CloudGuide on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Also a sense of accomplishment!
/r/TheRedPill24/07/18 05:11 AM
1

2019? Am I missing something?
/r/TheRedPill19/05/18 05:04 PM
1

If you have the money then Tinder plus and Gold is worth it. Have met/slept with heaps of girls through it. If you're above average attractive wise it's pretty easy. Gold (instant matches with your matches) is excellent. Saves useless time swiping. Tinder is much more efficient than going out to a bar (I've never enjoyed that). I know people will say 'just do PUA'. Yeah, well people are liars if they are always up for that or have perennial confidence. With Tinder you can get a few matches a day…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/18 06:55 PM
2

It does make you wonder tho, maybe the ability to spot one's weaknesses, to be self-conscious, to be honest with oneself is inbuilt. Why are some people brave and others not? I think there's a tiny amount of truth in their world view. Some people cannot be saved. Some people are just born retarded, either socially or mentally, or the same.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/18 06:42 PM
12

I disagree. Believing that motivation solely comes from within or the self is wrong. It's anomic individualism. You create and set conditions but you are also conditioned. Books, objects, other entities, etc. should motivate you, and you should make sure you are setting these conditions strategically. Some of the biggest traps come from believing that motivation is all 'within'.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/18 03:30 PM
1

False analogy. That's incorrect spelling which is incorrect in all cases. Theory as a word has various meanings (like most words) and was valid in OP's comment.
/r/askTRP15/03/18 03:49 PM
1

You're all over reading it. People don't normally say "good morning" like that so it's obviously strange behaviour. Her expression probably wasn't 'angry' rather shocked, bewildered, confused, and a bit of resting bitch face. She was just genuinely confused as to why some random bloke was saying hello. I would be the same.
/r/askTRP15/03/18 03:38 PM
1

I like reading real accounts, even embellished tellings of real events (everyone embellishes). But it's clear that a lot of accounts are simply pieces made to boost the confidence of the writer themselves. I.e. they're therapeutic. People need to feel better than they are. But BTW, picking up women can be hard, but once you get in the swing of things it can be really easy. But LMAO, Johnny Berba is literally the MOST fake PUA on YouTube. How so many people can't see this I don't know. The man's …
/r/TheRedPill24/01/18 01:10 PM
3

Karl Marx also wrote great critiques of other socialists/anarchists, more so than your garden variety libertarian/alt-righter.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/18 03:40 PM
2

Marx's connection of the LTV to capital is unique and is worth investigating from a purely intellectual perspective. That there's criticisms either way doesn't change this. As far as I'm concerned that the economic value is determined, or determined in quite some manner, by labour input seems to have some truth, and if it was true, then there does seem to be some of the other implications Marx says.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/18 03:38 PM
3

A lot of women show guys in their social media who aren't their bfs or even fuckbuddies, they're just men they string around and post with in their instagram/snapchat because it gives them validation (from other women, and they think it increases interest from other men).
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 02:16 AM
1

I think you're thinking of the fictional novel 'A rebours', which is about some decadent who lives in his own fantasies by himself and who at one stage gets a pet turtle. Nothing to do with Hegel tho. Who had a fairly conventional 19th century love life.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/17 01:37 PM
0

Schopenhauer hated Hegel, Hegel probably didn't even know Schopenhauer existed despite being at the same uni.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/17 04:20 AM
1

Hegel didn't reject women? He was married and even got his maid knocked up. And I'm pretty sure he got around a lot during his student days as well.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/17 04:19 AM
2

I don't get what your main point of your post was. That women don't want sex as much as men? In as far as basic biological urges, I believe this is true. But in regards to ego and validation, and all that other stuff your post infers, I think women do get insecure the longer they don't get sex in certain situations. Much of men's desire for sex is 'artificial' i.e. it's enhanced by the fact that 1) sex is often in short supply for men, and 2) to be a 'man' (alpha etc.) means plentiful supply of …
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 08:46 AM
1

It's amazing just how rigid black and white thinking one person can have. Surely an autist can even understand the fact that things matter but are not absolutes?
/r/TheRedPill09/12/17 09:11 PM
2

There's a form of male hamstering that believes that self-will, confidence, and merit can get you anywhere in life. It's true and it's not true.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/17 08:48 PM
4

This. Photos always make me look worse.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/17 09:57 PM
3

Yep. This. It might be a "first world problem" type issue, but when an attractive man talks to a woman (especially over text or online) she can get much more guarded and conscious of what she says, and the natural flow of conversation falters. Women can tend to close up and just answer questions and rarely ask questions themselves, coz they're too shy. So everything becomes very one-sided — and this in turn can signal to the attractive male that he's being rejected — especially true if the guy i…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/17 06:00 PM
1

Yeah, fake or not he's got game.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/17 07:55 AM
1

Yeah, homeless = / = beggar bum. There are many people who are homeless who still have jobs. They just can't afford a place to rent, or are blocked for other reasons.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/17 07:55 AM
1

I like it when women take care of you. It's often better than sex. Getting brought food and getting massages. Always try to get them to do this stuff for you.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/17 06:21 AM
3

30 year olds are easier. end of.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/17 05:57 AM
5

This is from one my favourite essays and writers. Thanks.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/17 06:15 AM
1

But the recent crop of posts you'd suspect that the incel migration began months ago.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/17 03:20 AM
1

Escalate. If she backs off, then just move on.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/17 03:18 AM
0

So did you have sex or not?
/r/TheRedPill09/11/17 03:15 AM
7

The 'introverted college hotties' are often just as easy if not more than you're basic bitch normie stacey. You normally have to jump through fewer hoops. Don't be mistaken by their appearance. If they're nerdy, geeky, introverted, or artsy, or anything—doesn't matter, they play the game just like every other girl, and are usually sleeping around with high value guys. I specialise in these types of girls. I always match with these artsy alternative wankers on Tinder. Don't be mistaken into think…
/r/TheRedPill09/11/17 03:14 AM
6

Women do not meet up with men 1-on-1 while in a relationship for 'friendship'. What? Women still meet up with betas for attention all the time. My ex-gf did it all the time. In fact I would encourage it. Takes her out of my hands for ages.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/17 04:28 PM
2

Women ultimately get off more on giving enjoyment to an great man than from the actual sex act itself IMO. I don't think I've ever given a woman an orgasm and I don't care. And they never seem to mind. They keep coming back. So many times I've just fucked their mouth and come from that. There's no sensation from getting your throat fucked. It's all mental. Women love that. But it's not actual sex is it? It's all the mentality and psychological aspect of it. Deep down women don't have the same se…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/17 12:04 PM
2

OP, you formed an emotional attachment to (and investment in) the interaction too soon This much is clear. The fact he's writing a report about this incident is proof. She would have felt the same thing. But he's 18, so still learning.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/17 12:00 PM
5

Not a catfish. A lot of people hate going on cam chat. I never do. If a girl ever asked for it or even a snapchat of me pre date I never would. Fuck that shit. The reason she unfriended was because the whole interaction sounded awkward as fuck. Women are creeped out by awkwardness. Doesn't matter if you think you've got game or you're got frame or you're in control. In all likeliness in real life you probably didn't.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/17 11:58 AM
4

That women like sex is obvious. I'm more wondering about pound-for-pound sex drive if all conditions were equal: i.e. in a utopia where sex was easily available for all. That women's magazines are focussed on sex tips and the such shows that they are more focussed on securing an alpha or good man than that they are interested in sex in itself. Even the "women love sex, but just with 10% of the population" infers that the real enjoyment women are getting are just by being with the 'alpha' and not…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/17 01:26 AM
3

Also, is it really true women want sex as much as men do? Because it sure doesn't seem like it. This is one of the great questions of life imo. Like all stats, facts, and common sense suggests they don't. But the desire that men have for sex is 'artificially' enhanced by the fact that there's often sexual scarcity. Desire desires what is scarce. I know from personal experience when I get sex often and easily I value it less and my desire for sex drops dramatically, and it often becomes more a ch…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/17 05:35 PM
0

Good post. Far too many autist betas are getting triggered by the fact that society matters. Alphas aren't the ultimate outsiders — they're the ultimate insiders. So many people generally, but specifically on this sub, rejoice in being an 'outsider' 'free thinker' 'unplugged' and all that bs. Look thinking for yourself is important, but being popular is even more important. Embrace being a normie. Stop being a fucking loser.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/17 05:20 PM
0

Laws always contradict each other — there's always conflicts and loopholes and overlaps. Hence why we have lawyers, judges, and courts — and hence why we have prudence. Laws simply are a measure of a tendency of a particular situation — and are universal to an extent, but are not universal to all situations and to all times. Hence Greene can extract certain principles/laws which work in some situations but not all others. When and where is the work of human prudence/judgement. But that doesn't m…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/17 05:10 PM
1

I disagree with the people trying to do the right thing part. Most people who try to do the right thing actually believe/think they're doing the right thing. If you do the right thing only because you know it's effective then you're more likely to be effective because you judge actions by their effects and not some a priori moral code imbedded into your psyche.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/17 05:03 PM
1

They are more laws than concepts. If you take the general concept of law rather than a specific meaning of 'scientific laws' or legal laws.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/17 05:01 PM
1

Law 38 doesn't contradict any of those other laws if you don't take 'behave like others' in some sort of autist literalist interpretation—which is the problem with people who need to follow rules as if they were rules in the first place. Law 38 = means your thoughts should have no need to be congruent to your actions unless it's to your advantage. i.e. there's no point or morality in being 'authentic' or congruent, unless it's effective to be so in that point or time.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/17 04:59 PM
10

This was like reading a science report or something.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/17 02:15 PM
4

our golden boy Fred died in 1900 "The 20th century was a century that began on January 1, 1901 and ended on December 31, 2000"
/r/TheRedPill05/11/17 02:04 PM
1

There weren't many good philosophers in the 20th century. Heidegger was good and a few of this followers. Arendt was a pretty good thinker, I agree. Better than most of the philosophers regularly touted as being important.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/17 02:03 PM
3

Donald's books, man.
/r/askTRP04/11/17 04:20 AM
2

Not true. He was on several important ruling councils and had high-ranking diplomatic / bureaucratic postings. In that sort of arena you learn more about 'power' and 'politics' than you do if you're simply a king or a dictator who uses 'force' and simple strength and legitimacy. In the court of a democracy you have to use cunning.
/r/askTRP04/11/17 04:19 AM
0

jazz lmao. meet up, make out, take her home, and fuck. that's all.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/17 02:39 AM
3

Yeah being reactive is pretty much the logical definition of a woman or beta. That doesn't mean the ideal man doesn't judge or compare their own worth or self-worth to others. Masculinity is both a conviction in one's own being and a measuring of this being against others — but against others you consider better or an example of excellence.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/17 07:26 AM
1

I don't think it was because he 'ruined the mood' but because he chose putting something as a priority before her. The fact that he put something before sex with her makes it really bad. For a woman, they know sex is their ultimate power/worth. You can't damage a woman's ego more than rejecting sex.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 01:00 AM
1

the answer to the question 'why' to anything regarding a woman is: validation.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 12:57 AM
1

Yeah, I agree with most of the other posters here. This wasn't a failed comfort test. It's more that she was momentarily upset about being 'rejected' for something else, and then when you asked 'why?' to her it validates her negative feelings and gives them more to grab onto, i.e. to make a mountain out of a moehill, makes her feel justified in feeling bad, it's like a self-fulfilling prophecy. You should never ask 'why' to her appearing upset. She probably is trying to look upset on purpose jus…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/17 12:55 AM
1

I matched with a girl in the morning once, started messaging her, and by midnight she was at my house without any prior meeting. She didn't even ask for my snapchat — I could have been catfishing her. But if you can connect with a woman and turn her on in text it can be done.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 02:14 AM
1

It's better to be a fuckboi than boring. Women are like men and tend to get sick of chit-chat and want easy sexual interactions. I got heaps of responses by just opening with asking what they liked in bed. But then Tinder threatened to ban me. Not sure if it's because I was spamming or because it was inappropriate behaviour. Either way I have to build up a bit of conversation before I ask stuff like that now. But the transition should be quick.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/17 02:11 AM
11

I used to fuck around on tinder, asking them out for dates, and going on other dates, etc. and rarely ever got anywhere. Started getting success just chatting up them on the app sexually and inviting them around to my house, or to a bar next to my house that day pretty much. You just have to go bold, start talking sex stuff, get her interest, and if you're lucky that she's in the right mood. Though I have got them after the 2nd date, IT IS a lot of energy, and time, and money. Just go for GOLD, …
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 12:58 AM
5

"The women whom watched" Whom?
/r/TheRedPill18/10/17 03:01 AM
3

Yeah, even if the girl has used dildos/fingered herself. Getting fucked by a dick is a whole different thing. There's measurable tension/pain.
/r/TheRedPill27/09/17 10:49 PM
1

Even with a good looking profile the matches will inevitably dry, I think. It's all part of tinder's money making program to make you buy for the services that cost money. As far as I know most people's experience is that they got heaps of matches in the first week, a bit less in the third, and then over the next month it declines massively. (if you're reasonably attractive)
/r/TheRedPill18/09/17 04:54 PM
1

Yeah, I've been wondering this myself. I read somewhere that the time people are on public transport is when there's peak tinder usage (rush hour/mornings/afternoons). But I haven't really observed that. I have received the most matches at 11pm on a Friday/Saturday. I think that's just generally the busiest time as lots of women are at home relaxing, probably horny. Probably also depends on what sort of guy you are. I'd imagine the more sexually attractive you are the more matches you get at tim…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/17 04:47 PM
7

Boost is to get in front of all the other men who are on tinder at the same time. Problem is though if you use it at peak time (say 10pm on a Friday, etc.) that's when everyone else will be using boost.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/17 05:49 AM
5

This is using boost. When I use it I'm usually guaranteed like 5-8 new matches as well. The Tinder algorithms are funny though. No one really knows how they work. And they're obviously skewed to getting you pay $$$. Coz it's pretty rate to get much matches for me unless I use the boost option.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/17 05:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter