TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CoachPinkPillYT Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by CoachPinkPillYT on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 11:38 PM
0

By that logic women should not get facial treatments, laser hair removal, or wear any makeup at all because it is not natural. Pretty dumb. What young men think is "natural" is usually very tastefully done light makeup or more.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 08:50 PM
0

By super model I mean an extremely attractive woman. So answer my question - if a man had the opportunity with being with a 10/10 who had a minor alteration or a 5/10 who was "natural" which would he chose? If you live in a major city there's a good chance most young women you know have had a filler(which is not permanent) or something minor that you wouldn't notice.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 08:47 PM
1

Interesting fact about grandmothers! I had no idea about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 06:48 PM
0

Not to make myself feel better, men have no idea what makeup and surgery actually looks out because only the really bad over the top instances stand out. The only reason you notice bad surgery is because it looks bad. If a woman looked just as good with a slight adjustment and you didn't know I highly doubt you'd care. I don't know any man that would turn down a super model with natural-looking, tasteful adjustments for a plain femcel because she was "natural".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 06:45 PM
1

Please read comment again. I have no problem with women working hard and earning a lot of money. My point is that a woman financially providing (aka bringing home the bacon) while a man kicks his feet up and does nothing is unnatural and bad for both parties. Relationships where the woman provides far more financially for the man have a higher divorce rate. On paper it would be nice but we, men and women, aren't socialized this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 06:41 PM
1

I agree being with a man in his late 30s-40s to have their first kid isn't maybe the best idea but it is still far better than trying to commit with a 23 year old who still plays Fortnight. Neither situation is great but life isn't perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 06:37 PM
1

I agree that they look better in their 20s, both men and women look best in their 20s. But considering all other factors like looks, with maturity, with ambition with success it would be curved slightly to 30s
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 09:41 AM
2

That's a good observation. It makes sense because feminism and women's right took different forms in the UK (Radical feminism) and third wave feminism in the US. Maybe also because of 1980s austerity in the UK families had to be OK with women working a lot more than in the 1980s US where families were still a bit more traditional.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 09:29 AM
0

i am lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 09:17 AM
1

Kudos for looks maxxing no. For bucksmaxxing(most men find this emasculating whether he tells you or not)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 09:09 AM
0

You're probably very young. I won't lie and say that attractive men have it a lot easier, especially in college. But unless you live in a major liberal city, most women by 25 tend to be open for marriage and traditional life with a kind guy. That's at least how it was when I lived in smalltown, USA. If the guy had a deformity or disability something, I can imagine it would be a lot harder though... the good thing is, what men aren't given by nature they can make up for with success. Ugly women d…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 09:07 AM
0

😂you have to be a troll
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 09:04 AM
1

70% of US millionaires are self made, meaning theyre less likely to have social rules like this. Yes - people tend to marry within socioeconomic class. But it's far easier for a Beautiful working class woman to marry a wealthy man, provided she's somewhat educated than a wealthy unattractive woman to marry that same wealthy man. Men care about looks first and foremost(which is fine) and women tend to consider assets.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 09:02 AM
0

There's a reason why wealthy men like Joe Rogan will marry a working class beautiful woman(his wife was his waitress). I'm inclined to believe most of the posters on here are below the age of 23.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 08:48 AM
2

Women abroad definitely will not provide for a man. Outside of the US women are far more hypergamous and are unapologetically so. Also, if you were beautiful, you wouldn't have to financially provide for your man or any man. That's just a fact. You know it deep down inside that you've never seen an actually beautiful desirable woman bragging about taking a masculine role(ie being the breadwinner).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 08:45 AM
1

Traditional families in the 1950s-60s and even in the 1980s didn't have "virgin brides and dowries". Married couples just divided labor differently. This could still be a reality now but neither party wants to play their role within a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 08:43 AM
-3

this is the problem - young men often project their own desires onto women(and women often do the same). Men and women are not the same and we don't look for the same things. A handsome man is a "plus" for me but I place importance on intellect, ambition and success far above looks. Yes, some young women are super into physically attractive men but it's kind of immature.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 08:41 AM
-4

That's good it worked for you and your relationship. It's good if you have a strong sense of self however most men's ego aren't that solid and a lot of women(and men) base self worth on the man providing. I personally wouldn't be against in theory, however I think it's a very fine line. A lot of relationships end over men and women "competing"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 08:22 AM
1

It's good that you know what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 08:13 AM
2

This is human nature. Men want beautiful women to give birth to healthy children. Women want resources to provide for their children. From a utilitarian POV this is a non-verbal contract that men and women have had since the beginning of time. You can either date a woman you find unattractive who may not require this from you, you can date someone who you(and society) finds attractive in both looks & demeanor thus work hard to provide this for her, or be single and try your luck. Just as women h…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 08:11 AM
2

If you plan on being forever single then fair enough lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 08:04 AM
24

This, as much as people complain about now, I would have it no other way then as a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 08:03 AM
2

This is the problem with young men. A lot of you complain about modern women but don't realize traditional men also provided for women. If a woman financially provided for you, I promise you'd resent her. It would be emasculating for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 07:55 AM
-6

This is anti-nature
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 07:37 AM
1

You obviously want an enthusiastic partner but worship is a touch too far. It'll come back to bite you sooner than later. Women who seek validation(or anyone for that matter) via relationships are never happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 07:29 AM
6

Its definitely possible but sadly not having a father puts young men at far more of a disadvantage. It's good to hear about your cousins, though!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 07:26 AM
2

Most of the time, no. I'm a woman who was raised by a single mother(although I had a semi-involved weekend Dad) and it troubles me how this is becoming normalized. I respect single motherhood because most of them didn't intentionally chose it. One shitty guy and a bad decision can easily get someone there, especially in the Black community. However it definitely should NOT be normalized. Our prison system, foster care system, domestic violence cases(on both sides) are filled with fatherless chil…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 07:24 AM
2

Men definitely peak in their 30s and I would say young women who start wanting to be serious, age 24+ should look to dating men in their mid 30s. Any man younger than 30 is not going to be ready to fully commit. Any woman here who is saying men peak in their 20's needs to keep living.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 07:20 AM
6

I'm a woman and I can attest that men don't care about plastic surgery if it looks good(ie feminine and not overly fake). I've had minor adjustments in the form of nose threads(to make my nose slimmer) and other small changes and my husband doesn't mind, nor did any other guy I dated. Literally all men care about in the beginning is if you look hot. The problem is too many young White women now are getting super large fillers and don't know where to stop. Little nips and tucks there aren't that …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 07:16 AM
1

So I used FDS when it first started and it has radically shifted since then. It is no longer centered on dating and is essentially European radical feminist talking points. They make tons of great points BUT these points are kind of common sense. Let men lead, don't be a pickmeisha, make him pay on dates are all 100% correct but after that FDS diverges quite a bit. They got their initial philosophy from YT level up gurus like SheraSeven1, Anna Bey and others but don't even adhere to their teachi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 06:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter