TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CodeCody23 Archive

View 0 posts and 374 comments by CodeCody23 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

No it can’t because incels are inherently weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/23 03:23 PM
1

With this post idk if there’s anything more to really discuss.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/23 09:04 PM
2

sigh 50/50 IS 100/100.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 12:11 PM
1

Found the mothers basement incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 12:07 PM
2

I find that the shallow critique these days is just used as a tool to shame the person you would date that wouldn’t want to date you. Its odd that height is used as an example, which men are mostly irked by, when it’s facial attractiveness which is by far the most “shallow” metric used by all genders. Go tell a person in the top percentage of attractiveness they’re shallow for going after someone equally attractive, and excluding average folk. You will look silly. If you can afford good food, yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 11:34 AM
46

They don’t think, they feel. Which is why you get perspectives like this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 07:12 PM
9

It’s funny to see how out of touch people are on here, yet for them, they think of it as an “eureka” moment in which they finally understand. I mean family salary statistics immediately disprove your claim about parents with good careers leading women to not value money.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 06:16 PM
2

They aren’t contradictory but the job metaphor was bad. Being strong and independent doesn’t mean going against what is already in your favor, i.e being catered to in the initial dating stages, men paying for dates, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 09:55 AM
2

A therapist not understanding consent is wild. You’re actually, the-rapist. Thanks, I’ll be here all week.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 09:07 PM
8

Why would a woman not get an education to get a higher paying job and instead stake their chances on a lasting marriage? Could you convince women who are going to college to forgo it entirely and instead find a man to take care of them? Good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:45 AM
-4

The flaw is easy. Conscription or a draft doesn’t happen enough for this comparison to have any weight. It’s like a Police officer wanting appreciation for his dangerous job while his jurisdiction is in an affluent area with low crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:02 PM
1

Yep. I hardly even participate here anymore. Just read dumb shit and laugh.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 02:00 PM
1

Except that’s not his argument. The analogy is simply an erroneous comparison between a penis/vagina and a key/lock to derive the inherent function of both.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 10:27 AM
4

One of the main reasons I no longer called myself redpilled. Too many men in the community are just lost betas trying to find meaning in life by having success with women, with gurus like Andrew Tate making a killing off those dummies. Could no longer bare to associate myself with that community, where cognitive dissonance is rampant, where ironically the redpill Bible is called, “The Rational Male”.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 11:56 AM
2

Idk how much you had to dumb yourself down to label an attack on a demographic as a disagreement.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 07:56 PM
1

Except I already countered. You just disregarded it as irrelevant. You say how do I know it’s this, based on that, then you go on about the same exact line of reasoning on why it’s actually, this based on that. Feminization of men, western views on gender roles, all issues you deem significant enough to warrant genuine concern, to oppose my view that she adopts these positions simply because they have been proven to be more lucrative then her take on bitcoin. I also have no clue why you think we…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:23 PM
1

This is stupid. You assert my bias based on the claims I made on one person, I assert your bias based on the claims you made, and the much larger implications that you assert go beyond Andrew Tate and into western society, yet I’m the one that has to prove your bias. Interesting flavor of your kool aid.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 06:55 PM
1

Interesting how you call out my biases when it’s clear this whole thing with Andrew Tate which I see as insignificant means much more to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 06:43 PM
1

Her most popular, also most recent videos all come from redpill content despite most of her videos being related to finance and even promotes a bitcoin book as a cover photo. My deductions aren’t based on biases, but my understanding of how content creators pick and choose subjects to cover, and how to cover them. Her acting as a “unicorn” in a manosphere space garners clicks. It’s that simple and I’m surprised how I even need to break it down. I haven’t heard Tate speak in months, but one of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 03:50 PM
0

I don’t have proof, I can simply deduce that’s the case due to her video upload history, and being in the manosphere space for a period of time. With that being said I already knew and heard Tate speak before he went viral. I don’t need tiktok clips to confirm anything I didn’t already know.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 01:23 PM
-1

A chameleon woman on YouTube that adheres to redpill talking points solely to get subscribers from men isn’t credible. No clue why testimonials on someone have more value than content the person themselves create.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 11:03 AM
6

Lol why would comic con put a stop to it? Do you know how many coomers fund it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 11:17 AM
1

This honestly sounds like a kid talking with those high school examples. Only thing I agree with are the dork redpill wannabes forking over money to be taught how to be redpill or how to get women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 09:49 AM
13

Both your claims are false. alimony awards have always been very rare, going from about 25 percent of cases in the 1960s to about 10 percent today, said Judith McMullen, a professor of law at Marquette University. In one study of Wisconsin cases, she found it was only 8.6 percent. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-women-divorce-alimony/how-bread-winning-women-are-driving-alimony-reform-idUSKCN0T61O920151117 Even women who do work during the marriage see their income drop by 20% once they are di…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 10:15 AM
0

That’s still not even an equivalent and I’m not an advocate of marriage. No need to die on a hill for it. You don’t need mortality rates after divorce to convince a large portion of people not to get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 10:04 AM
7

https://sites.utexas.edu/contemporaryfamilies/2014/01/16/impact-of-conservative-protestantism-on-regional-divorce-rates Conservatives are more likely to divorce. I would say only with the outright devout Christians will marriage last but even then that doesn’t mean it’s a good or happy marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/22 02:03 AM
0

I couldn’t do it. Once I see you as a friend you’re that. It would feel weird having sex casually. I have never REALLY been friends with any fwbs.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 03:56 PM
7

It’s really not. Like at all. There is a reason anything is assigned a value.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 09:12 AM
1

Except his reproductive rights wouldn’t be violated. Conception already occurred, in which the responsibility of nurturing the fetus that point forward lies with the company. If there is such termination of the fetus, it would be written in some sort of legal contract that is signed at the beginning before conception, and keeping it or terminating it would be based off of what is written. Regardless of the outcome, men or women reproductive rights wouldn’t be violated.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 11:00 PM
3

Only on a case by case basis. Conception inside an artificial womb would have had to have consent of both parties otherwise it would probably be illegal, in which case the fetus would probably be aborted. A women would still have total control if done the natural way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 10:00 PM
1

😂
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 12:08 PM
1

This sounds like a corporate incel rant. How can someone say they had a “redpill awakening” and not be embarrassed? And this “awakening” caused you not to pursue relationships with women? This is why I swear most redpill dudes are just betas that can’t cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 12:03 PM
3

Sound like a beta worried about what the next dude doing. Do what’s necessary in YOUR relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 07:45 AM
2

That’s outside the point OP is making, which is simple or complicated regarding ease of understanding, not dealing or accomplishing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 07:33 PM
7

I disagree. People who know what they want are actually pretty simple. People that are manipulative, damaged etc, come off as complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 07:01 PM
1

How is it that women have intrinsic value due to the ability to be pregnant, but men don’t in the ability to get them pregnant? Regarding society both have intrinsic value. There are no Amazon societies or male only societies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 05:50 PM
6

So what you’re saying is, preteen boys are waking up angry because of woke-ism? That’s a hard sell.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 08:15 PM
16

The demographic of men you talk about are for the most part undesirables. They don’t matter in the dating market. There are no chads, and money makers that wake up angry. Too busy enjoying life.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 05:26 PM
12

Lol I’m not. Nothing will change. Attractive people get what they want, average people get what they can, ugly people get what they get.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 05:19 PM
16

I would say you’re out of touch in believing this will really go in any meaningful direction. Andrew Tate was a wolf leading sheep. He made money off of beta males trying to live the alpha fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 05:09 PM
2

Not everything, just the topics I listed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 03:46 PM
22

This is a dumb take and made for a good laugh, but abortion is great for population control, and saves tax payer money long term. 👌
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 03:42 PM
1

Dating is easy, just do these things. BRILLIANT
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 03:13 PM
6

Don’t have kids bro. They gonna be bums for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 09:45 PM
9

Or give her advice on why dating someone double her age is weird? If your daughter was a drug addict at 18 would you just go “she’s an adult not my problem”? Why am I a better parent than you and I don’t even want kids😂
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 08:20 PM
5

Either you would be a horrible parent, or you don’t have the foresight to see your mindset changing. The idea of you being okay having your daughter be some old guys hot young thing is weird af.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 08:14 PM
3

I won’t date someone making considerably less than me. I care about career first, education second.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/22 01:41 PM
1

It’s fantasy dude. Might just be for the nut when you’re single, but married? Whole different ball game.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 12:56 AM
8

Yeah I don’t get that part. It’s a bare minimum standard that OP and the author labeled as a “higher” standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 09:21 PM
2

I didn’t know how often men lied about height till I came on Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 04:13 PM
0

Except listing concerns and rationalizing poor behavior are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 12:34 PM
4

I know a dead end when I see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 03:17 AM
10

How about you understand what an eye for an eye means then come back.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 03:15 AM
9

Dude, don’t tell me to read it again when it’s you that doesn’t understand what is being said. The feasibility of an eye for an eye is irrelevant. The whole point is how it’s being used to rationalize doing x.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 03:09 AM
11

Nah, that’s exactly what is being said.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 02:51 AM
23

Someone does you wrong, then you do wrong onto someone else because it’s “us” vs “them”. Great logic there.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 02:37 AM
65

Eye for an eye is proof you’re in some sort of fantasy war with women, and rationalizing your part in it. Do what you want but keep the crazy to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 02:28 AM
1

Dude, my goodness, nothing is being ignored. The effectiveness of his genuine vs fake behavior is irrelevant. No one is obligated to put up with some else’s façade because it’s harder for them not to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:21 PM
5

Not ignoring it. It’s simply common sense that if you drop behavior which attracts someone you obviously wouldn’t be able to keep them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 08:40 PM
-4

Not what I was suggesting, and I did offer an alternative if change wasn’t feasible. So 5/10 for reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 08:36 PM
4

I mean it’s a hard truth. Some personalities narrow dating pools more than others. The solution is either genuine change, or acceptance of that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 06:26 PM
6

POV: You admit you have a fake persona and get upset women are no longer interested when you can no longer maintain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 06:05 PM
2

I don’t think it’s really wide if you look at the most popular YouTube content. Mediocre tutorial reviews, coach Greg Adams, bald white guy (forgot his name), fresh and fit, there was a few more. Lost respect for a lot of them when they were riding Samuels dick for content. Fresh and fit by far is the most embarrassing of them all. But I watched them for entertainment and even that got stale. Seen Rollo speak a few times on there and thought nothing of what he had to offer, holding frame, dread …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 03:49 AM
1

The roommates are one of the few good ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 02:18 AM
3

Listened to a lot of Kevin Samuels. Bringing him up helps my argument because he’s is a prime example of what kind of content clicks with men. Women calling in asking why they can’t get a high value man, brought him a lot more viewership than him telling men how to become a high value man. Kevin Samuels is part of the more reasonable part of the manosphere too.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 10:40 PM
13

I don’t take staunch RP followers very seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 07:47 PM
18

Lol anyone is welcome to go into the subreddit or watch manosphere content on YouTube and see for themselves. Most people that see through bs will come to the same conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 05:20 PM
96

I have been in the RP space for a while, and it’s mostly about women, not about men. Men talk about accountability for about 5 mins and the rest of the time is about how women are ruining everything. RP content creators are about content. You’re fooling yourself if you think the content men want to hear are the ones where it’s actually their fault they turned out they way they did.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/22 04:22 PM
5

I barely understood what you wrote. But since you brought up F&F I know it has to be a lot of redpill bs they spew.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 05:35 PM
3

Lol no man with any sense will take a risk of getting charged with sexual harassment over a women he likes. Of course that’s IF he believed it was a possibility. Some men don’t which is fine too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:15 AM
7

If that’s your point then it completely undermines your argument that men beauty standards are higher. The beauty industry is completely dominated towards women. It’s supply and demand. There are more avenues for women to become beautiful because that’s what is expected of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:28 AM
0

Hardly a death sentence. I thought it was when I was a teen. Now I wouldn’t have it any other way. A lot less maintenance with hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 04:59 PM
5

“Choosing correctly” is a weak argument and completely ignores a few marital issues which could spark a divorce to begin with. Some people for sure ignore red flags, other times problems simply arise in life which make being a couple no longer feasible.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 10:28 PM
5

Interesting that the wives here think a personal testimonial of their husband means anything. If you are not terminally ill, had cancer, or another debilitating disease, your word means nothing, and the conclusion drawn from the article went over your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 02:31 PM
8

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 12:05 AM
5

The majority of men are logical. No, but they sure love to believe that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 02:13 AM
2

But are you really submissive? Because being submissive isn’t just letting someone have the wheel, it’s not agreeing with the decisions of the one leading, and going with them anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 11:58 AM
7

I don’t understand how you can say it benefits them we it has already been established they are better off staying married. How can an action be beneficial if it leaves you worse off?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 07:09 PM
8

I have, and have yet to see a rebuttal from you which indicates that women are financially better divorced than married. Both spouses, financially speaking are better off not getting a divorce, but when it happens, the man eventually comes out ahead, because of his established career.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 06:52 PM
10

I don't understand how you can say women are being fucked by divorce with a straight face. Statistics. Men are more likely to come out ahead because they have a career that was not stunted by child birth and rearing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 06:43 PM
14

Me, a man also not giving a fuck about how hard dating is for men lol. The Chads don’t give a shit either. Only men that care are the men that have trouble.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 04:52 PM
35

The craziest thing about this post is someone using Amber Heard of all people as a representative of a majority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 03:33 PM
27

Seems like this is ironically a highlight of male entitlement if anything. Crying about experiences that have been denied to you by someones ugly friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 02:44 PM
1

Have you explained this to your SO? Because it seems you two are incompatible. Something like this should have been brought up sooner. You can’t convince anyone to get married and for them to be wholly committed to it. It seems to me this is over unless you are willing to not marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:49 PM
2

Yep. I don’t even want to get married, but the moment someone classifies it as “worthless” clearly doesn’t have a balanced view at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 03:33 PM
1

Lol women from a young age are brainwashed by Disney princess romance and desperately search their whole adult lives trying to find that same magic. Men not so much. It’s always cool to be a bachelor with money.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 06:42 PM
26

“Money isn’t everything” - some financially secure person.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 08:53 PM
3

A guy doing what’s best for him has nothing to do with biological imperative or it would be for every man, regardless of the ability to have multiple women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 03:59 PM
8

Men being with multiple women, and cheating aren’t the same thing. Cheating is deception, if you want multiple women then be in an open relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 03:54 PM
2

You got any sources regarding prenups and bias?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 07:10 PM
9

Every law suit is at the discretion of the judge. Not sure what you’re saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 03:35 PM
16

Prenups can and do get thrown out. The men that complain don’t do the research as to why. Prenups done properly hold up in court just like any other well written contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 01:15 PM
1

They have a point. A lot of men just want the sex, so why would a woman throw an invite when there’s a good chance she will be used? No one wants to feel like they were being proactive in inviting misery.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 08:53 PM
11

The dating market will tilt more towards men when most stop thinking with their dicks, especially so if we are talking online dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:18 PM
1

This is why I said to get a prenup the RIGHT way. This includes both spouses to have a lawyer to take part in drafting a prenup at least half a year before the wedding. There aren’t any excuses, they are ways for men to protect themselves, but they don’t. Any man afraid of marriage or doesn’t like the potential fallout of divorce, should either get a prenup or don’t get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 12:39 PM
4

I think you need to go back to the drawing board if you think a woman getting fat is the first thing in your mind as an exception to break off a marriage with no penalty. Tired of this woe is me nonsense regarding men and marriage. Men need to take accountability and stop getting married. You don’t think marriage is fair? Don’t get married. You don’t like divorce laws? Get a prenup (and do it the RIGHT way).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 12:30 PM
-1

It is backwards. If the more homosexuality is normalized, then men couldn’t possibly have less fear of being labeled as gay. That’s like saying normalizing therapy for men increases suicide rates for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 09:54 AM
-1

I thought I was redpill because of my attitude of not being used by women, not really believing in chivalry and what not, and the idea of self improvement. When I learned more about redpill, I realized how much bs is in it and how many men I would never want to associate with also call them selves redpill. A lot of them just bitch about women, have zero accountability, immoral, and I find a lot of them, the culture and the “coaches” simply pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 12:41 PM
3

If you knew of any research regarding porn and increased cuckholdry you would have led with that. What we get instead is you attributing your belief due to post nut clarity, and feeling better that you watch women masturbate instead. Think about how silly that sounds trying to be holier than thou with a porn category. It’s all considered indecent.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 12:38 PM
1

Nah. More projection on your part. Watching porn brings up certain “urges” in you that it doesn’t in me. You don’t know what a cuck is to begin with so I don’t see this conversation going anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:55 AM
-1

Lol what? Women aren’t immediately available. I feel like you’re projecting yourself onto me. When I don’t have any women and I have needs I use porn. When I have a woman I don’t use it, and I still don’t feel like sharing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:43 AM
3

Lol It’s not. All this is is some random guy with an epiphany based on zero evidence due to post nut clarity. If that doesn’t tell you that you need to actually formulate a more convincing argument idk what will.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:40 AM
1

There was not a lot of thought was put into this. Being a cuck is sharing your SO with someone else. A far cry from watching two strangers fuck, which is really just you projecting yourself to replace the man or women depending on the person.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:33 AM
1

Imagine thinking one’s belief of monogamy stems from being a celebrity or a commoner.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 01:31 PM
1

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 10:13 PM
0

Lol and you think women aren’t pressured to get married? They are under more pressure to find a permanent partner. Being a 30 year old bachelor with money is cool, 30 year old single woman less so. I’m not confusing proposal and initiation. You initiate marriage by first proposing. I also have zero sympathy for men getting married via ultimatums, that is literal weakness.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 02:37 PM
4

I can flip that around. If marriage is so bad for men, then why do men keep initiating marriage, and keep getting married? I’m not even a marriage advocate. Marriage is based off of love, not logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 02:24 PM
1

Ok so not all studies are as conclusive as we are lead to believe based on the methodology of how the study was conducted, and if it’s done correctly, it’s pc culture that covers it up. You don’t have an argument, just a bias which for some reason you are completely oblivious to.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 01:58 PM
8

This sounds like copium and makes zero sense. Marital statistics also show that single women without children are happier than married women AND men. They also show that women initiate a vast majority of divorces. There is data readily available that would “offend” women regarding their ambitions towards marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 01:25 PM
1

Has anyone seen screen rants take on this movie? I haven’t seen it, and yes it’s disturbing how the twilight series is described. https://youtu.be/4E29RzEUGrs
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 07:22 PM
3

I don’t know why. People make a lot of dumb decisions every day, based off of emotion and not reason. I think it is dumb to keep a child in which the father wants out.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 02:16 PM
10

Because someone else’s fuck up shouldn’t be pushed onto tax payers for 18 years. So yes, if she keeps the baby, whatever man played a part in impregnating the woman should absolutely help pay the costs of raising a child. Also women are the ones who bear children, so obviously their opinion on what to do with the future off spring has more weight than a man and his wallet.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 01:59 PM
5

Ultimately no, reproducing and protecting offspring are two different components. The comment suggested being horny is the driving factor of providing and protecting, and it’s not. Men don’t have any desire whatsoever to invest in side pieces despite having sex with them, hence why there’s memes on Valentine’s Day about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 09:04 PM
11

Except men don’t protect and provide on the basis of being horny.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 05:54 PM
3

That’s why I said, “pseudo” simps. People who enforce simp behavior but aren’t simps themselves. If someone called them simps on the basis of telling women what they want to hear to make a buck I wouldn’t argue with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 05:36 AM
2

I don’t understand what you’re saying. They promote what a lot of men think is simp behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 05:25 AM
6

Pick me’s or simps make it harder to change the behavior expected from the opposite sex, especially true if said pick me or simp has a large social media following. The “pseudo” simps that a lot of men dislike would be Derrick Jackson, or papidon. I say “pseudo” simps because they just say what women want to hear and make money off of it. I don’t think they really believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 05:19 AM
88

Same reason why simps are disliked by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 05:03 AM
2

Chill. I simply used an example in line with OPs reasoning of a woman’s reproductive value.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 02:14 PM
4

Nah. I can tell your retort is akin to a knee jerk reaction. Even an ugly woman can birth x person that could potentially elevate society through charisma, innovation, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 01:56 PM
6

A women without looks doesn’t equal a man without a job lol. Having a job is the basis of any functional adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 01:47 PM
1

Sure, still barking up the wrong tree.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 12:51 PM
1

Argue with them on not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 12:46 PM
1

No, you need a refresher on what TRP teaches, and SMV is just one part.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 02:44 AM
5

High value has different meanings between the two philosophies, and TRP is way more than just SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 02:04 AM
14

They don’t pursue the same thing at all. FDS values long traditional relationships. TRP is using everything in your arsenal to get laid and come out on top.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 01:58 AM
3

Hell of an imagination you got to make having a gf the equivalent of being the 100th dick inside a prostitute over the last week.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 02:23 AM
2

Definitely won’t catch me there. Fucking a woman that just fucked some other dude doesn’t sit right with me. Yuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 01:31 AM
6

Because men don’t mind getting laid. The problem is with men, not women. Male culture is completely different from female’s in that getting laid is encouraged, regardless of your ability to consent, in fact, your consent is assumed regarding sexual encounters. Males will rarely ever report rape, even if they believed they were raped, because of how they were raised to view sex from the perspective of a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 07:03 PM
34

Depends. I have been drunk, yet fully conscious of what I am doing and saying. Really depends how “drunk” you are. There aren’t really defined levels to it other than the alcohol content level measured for a DUI. Some are drunk, yet actually fully understand what they are saying and doing, others just act fucking crazy. Problem is it’s impossible to know from the outside. So yes, men need to behave as if any women under the influence of alcohol has no clue what they’re doing or saying when it co…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 06:45 PM
1

Not when money is involved. This seems to be scoped to just flings as opposed to serious relationships. I would imagine most men would not be happy providing for any women financially if they in fact knew he was and continues to be a rebound.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 09:27 PM
29

Lol well this is a first. Men are more emotionally aware than women now? Must have happened over night.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 01:59 PM
2

This tells me that you in fact, need FDS or some sort of dating philosophy . You don’t seem well equipped to navigate this on your own. If you feel less than appreciated, having a good time when you’re with him should not balance it out and leave you feeling, “idk”. Personally I would just end it. You should never have to tell someone to up their game in a relationship, because now you’re telling them to behave in a way in which they don’t normally behave, which could have that person eventually…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 09:58 PM
1

Right? Weird how I’m this way, and you’re that way, it’s almost as if it’s a preference. Also, oral is included in vanilla.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 02:45 PM
23

Anything that isn’t “vanilla”. I am a simple man.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 11:20 PM
1

Anecdotal evidence from a woman in prison is hardly convincing. Any studies, surveys or polls?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 08:50 PM
35

No, it means being good looking with money and status beats average looking with more money and status. The money at this point for Bezos essentially maxed the law of diminishing returns.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:07 PM
0

Dude, I don’t care about your conclusions made from the study lol. I’m just explaining why I wrote what I wrote. He’s a redpill guy, so his fear of not getting laid again tells me he has a long way to go.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:42 PM
0

Dude it’s really simple. I’m simply responding to a comment that explains why said person was fearful of the 80/20 rule, which is summed up as failure to get laid. Not fear of being in a dead bedroom which implies other problems in the relationship other than failure to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:26 PM
0

I’m not. I’m was referring to the comment which said the possibility of not getting laid ever again was terrifying.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:20 PM
-2

That’s reaching. To put getting laid as the emphasis for something far more encompassing such as a relationship pretty much shows the real concern.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:17 PM
-3

Next level naïveté if you think dating sites filter out men looking to get laid. Pretty sure I’ve gotten hookups on there, and they also have an option to choose for something more casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:14 PM
-7

Nope. Priorities are fucked up if you find not getting laid, “terrifying”, I can see how it sucks, but terrifying? We aren’t even talking about actual relationships, just simply getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:47 PM
2

To be honest I’m more interested in your story on how you became some what of a narcissist. Daughter too? Shiiiit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:02 PM
-6

Lol terrifying?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:47 PM
1

I doubt they will pass it. And if it did, it will work the same way weed does. Marijuana is still federally illegal, yet no administration as of yet has enforced the law upon the states. So abortion will work the same way dependent on who is in the White House.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:12 PM
0

Is this about the whole roe v wade with the Supreme Court? If it gets overturned the worst that happens is that states can ban it outright. It won’t be illegal everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:57 PM
4

What? abortion? I don’t think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:46 PM
10

Nah. Abortion is great for population control, and saves on tax dollars spent on social welfare. Seems to me you don’t have much of an argument. You just threw in Dave chappelle and called it a day.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:45 PM
12

His opinion is common amongst men, although highly flawed. It’s always projection and it’s a destructive mindset put in young boys, by other male peers that they need to be sexually active as soon as possible, and that sexual success IS success. He doesn’t have a problem with his son “pulling” a 32 year old, because at 16 it’s what he would have wanted as well. He’s not thinking of any of the consequences that could arise from that relationship like a getting 32 year old pregnant and having your…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:17 PM
6

Nope. Only thing more apparent now, than “then”, is that attractive people benefit most from social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 09:55 PM
5

No idea who that is. EDIT: lol wasn’t thinking about that shooting. I was thinking about another one that shot up a therapy place.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 06:42 PM
32

Until a femcel starts shooting up public places because they can’t get laid, I’m not sure they warrant the same attention incels get.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 06:40 PM
2

Population control is key, for a stable, and resource abundant society. Say yes to abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 06:24 PM
29

Men do use hypergamy. You say men and women are different but then judge them on the same aspects that they desire from the opposite sex. Hypergamy is simply opting for the better option. That’s it. What that better option is depends on the individual. I’m sure both women and men have stories about their interest choosing someone else, then running back when the grass wasn’t greener.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/21 08:51 PM
2

Lol why the fuck would you get married and you’re still hesitant? To get married to scratch something off the bucket list is just dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 12:22 PM
2

Women weren’t living with their husbands rent free lol. You sound naive. They were always paying, whether it was mental or physical. I don’t know how you can be an aspiring housewife and not worry about your financial independence and security.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:10 AM
2

So an entire demographic being hypocritical or not hinges on two Reddit topics. Interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:09 PM
5

Why are men so fixated on hypothetical chads their interest may or may not have interacted with?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 06:49 PM
1

Another guy in too deep.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 09:21 PM
3

It’s all ridiculous. What is men, “fighting back”? This battle of the sexes is all bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 12:35 PM
4

Depends how you look at it. If you have to explicitly state an ultimatum regarding sex then yes, at that point the relationship is basically over, and it would be weird to pressure someone into an act they don’t want to do. Keeping it to yourself on the other hand is fine, because you aren’t pressuring anyone. You just need to end the relationship and find someone that matches your needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 02:15 PM
4

But it can be. It’s simply a chemical reaction due to external stimuli. How easily a person can fall out of love is dependent on the underlying factors which elicit the reaction to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 11:03 PM
6

So how technical are we going to get with this? Because love is an emotion, and emotions are just hormones released into the body.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 10:42 PM
8

All I got from this is that feminism can cripple the dumbest of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 04:04 PM
9

Of course there’s that one dude that looks at a disgusting comment and goes, “WHatS THe PRoBlem?”
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 02:24 PM
2

Women do have a “wall”, and Men have it too, the only difference being that according to redpill, a man’s increased resources with age will get them that hot 20-27 year old woman that chooses them over a hot younger male in a similar age group.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 10:58 PM
13

More like brainwashing and low self esteem. Not sure if devotion and love are the primary reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 02:43 PM
1

What you’re saying makes no sense. There can’t be more than one context for a word with one definition. If there is no central premise from which ethics is derived, that means anyone can form their own belief system which makes it by definition, subjective. In the English language a planet is in fact partly defined by its shape, it’s shape being an ellipsoid. You’re simply performing mental gymnastics at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 07:29 PM
2

Lol what? At the time there was no law protecting non combatants, and the term genocide was not coined until 1944. The Nazis actions were internationally deemed illegal retroactively. 1. There is no central authority on morality. 2. Subjective ethics has nothing to do with you getting the definition of murder wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 07:01 PM
2

Actually murder is an illegal killing, not immoral, which is subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 06:40 PM
6

Lol NASA didn’t even allow women into their program till the 60s.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 06:16 PM
1

No, a lot men do want companionship eventually, and some men want it out of the gate, but a large portion of men just want the sex. It’s bred in American male culture to be successful with women, in which how often you get sex is used as a measuring stick.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 01:55 PM
1

Why are you so butthurt? Honestly seems like I incidentally quoted one of your talking points without even knowing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 01:44 PM
3

They don’t need to explicitly say it. It’s not rocket science. Men want sex. Top men get it easily, other men jump through hoops. The differential treatment breeds resentment, when non chads want to live the chad life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 01:40 PM
7

Happens all the time or else complaints on the 80/20 rule, and Chad Fucks, beta bucks wouldn’t be a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 01:20 PM
9

White guy: Minority groups play victim to get ahead in society. Also white guy: WHITES ARE UNDER ATTACK.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 04:38 PM
3

Just spoke with the monster under my bed. Can confirm.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 04:39 AM
8

Kevin isn’t redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 02:12 AM
1

I’m just here to offer my 2 cents every once in a while. I thought I was actually redpill at first since I don’t trip over myself to get a woman. The more I learned about redpill the more bs I found, and the more I saw betas really trying their damnedest to be taken seriously as alphas by being assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:36 PM
2

Not surprised. I always thought people believed the most attractive of features of anyone biracial is to have caramel skin in contrast with colored eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:27 PM
4

Watching it for entertainment and willingly taking part in it are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 09:30 PM
1

It really doesn’t need to actually represent the entire population of men. Some amount of men, will view women with less respect if they approach first. From the perspective of a woman, it makes little sense to approach men if they don’t have to. Whether you approach or not, I believe most men already have intentions for you anyway good or bad. A lot of women don’t want to be used simply because they took the initiative, especially if they have been used before even with men approaching them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/21 04:47 PM
4

Exactly, I have a tendency to simp for the girls I crush on and I’d feel uncomfortable with the imbalance unless she sipped for me back, even if it’s not equal it can put me at ease that way. No offense but you sound like a simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 08:26 PM
7

Divorce for women is bad too. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992251/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 08:19 PM
1

You are just making a comparison with men. I just said more women today are college educated, which is fact, and would still mean more opportunity. What they do with the opportunity or the worth of their degree they chose is another discussion. Unless you have a statistic regarding single career women with a 401K AND poverty, and not just any single woman with no kids, then I’m not convinced of your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 10:48 PM
1

Not sure. Never said anything about new or old. Sounds like you are inferring government programs or new industries. I just said women have more opportunity to make money and have a career than they did then. One reason is because way more women are college educated now than they were 25 years ago, and are qualified to enter more fields that are historically male dominated.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 10:13 PM
6

There’s no article you brought forward which is really impactful or addresses a detriment for women focusing on careers. First study has no data regarding the occupation of said women in poverty, second article addresses a demographic in which their highest capability of earning money was generations ago. Women have way more opportunities now than then.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 09:05 PM
1

This is like men not wanting to marry a sex worker, even though she’s biologically attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 09:24 PM
1

There’s no point in speaking hypotheticals. Just research it. https://www.unhappymarriage.info/men-vs-women-who-fares-better-in-a-divorce/ https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/men-v-women-who-does-better-in-a-divorce
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 03:31 PM
1

That’s fine. I just don’t understand why you have women in your circle that you don’t trust in which you have to search their phone to verify every little thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 09:25 PM
7

Checking your ex’s phone everyday and having all her passwords isn’t trust. It’s clear you don’t trust women at all, simply because of what you do or did.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 09:08 PM
1

Nice exit strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 06:23 PM
2

No idea who that is, and also try formulating an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 06:16 PM
3

So you think women had greater power and social influence over men throughout history?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 06:13 PM
2

Lol dude a develop software for life insurance companies, and had to take classes regarding retirement vehicles. I have looked at the numbers. And welfare? You do know people who are on welfare are in poverty correct? You think being on welfare or receiving child support payments put the average woman in the middle class? Because that’s the only way I see how they could benefit “enormously”.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 05:18 PM
2

I’m not dancing. It’s simple math, and knowing the power dynamics between men and women throughout history.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 05:06 PM
1

Clarify. I’m not sure what your point is.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 04:53 PM
3

ok I can tell you’re really empowered today.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 04:45 PM
2

So what? Since you’re willing to do it that means most woman are? I think we both know a majority women do not plan on proposing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 04:43 PM
5

This doesn’t say anything other than the top tier of men had control of the market of women. Which seems to drive my point further.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 04:37 PM
4

Women do have more options, but the detriment of picking the wrong person is much greater for a woman than it is for a man. How significant is a woman’s power in dating when that power is mostly utilized at the swipe left or right stage?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 04:32 PM
-1

I said for the most part, not every part. Although women do initiate a vast majority of divorce proceedings, statistically speaking they are much worse off than the man upon divorce, and the #1 threat to a woman’s retirement is divorce. So no, divorce certainly does not financially benefit the majority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 04:24 PM
-1

Lol not naive at all. Men have way more options than women on the very fact that women are way less likely to use a man for sex. The only thing easier for woman is simply getting a guy, any guy, that’s it. A poor decision for a woman is inherently worse because their healthy fertile years have a much smaller window. Men can afford, and DO fuck around for much longer period.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 04:19 PM
4

Yes, but a lot of those preferences are simply ideal based on their respective culture. For example if woman has been with a guy for 3 years, and doesn’t ever get a straight answer from the guy she’s seeing on when they’ll get married, she can either worry about becoming a forever girlfriend, or propose herself and get it over with. Not ideal at all for her to be the one proposing, even though she is fully able to.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 03:55 PM
1

No, they do have control, but women often defer certain decisions escalating the relationship to the man, such as proposing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 03:39 PM
6

I see this a lot. Men, now and always controlled the dating game, because the buck stops with men regarding exactly where the relationship goes and how deep it gets. Most women date for a long term relationship, not for a quick fuck. All women have in dating is the ability to accept or deny given men for the most part make the first move. Anything escalating past the initial dating stages is for the most part in the mans court.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 02:59 PM
31

This person with “pornsickness” has the problem. This is the first attempt I’ve seen to turn it around as an ugly woman issue, in which him being with someone he doesn’t find attractive showcases yet another character problem he has.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 02:54 AM
–

Being attractive has ruined me You poor thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 03:38 PM
–

Virgin men, or awkward virgin men? There’s a difference. A person who is awkward is not well versed in social interactions, so they are not even properly equipped to dispel any misconceptions about themselves appropriately. A man or even a person who cannot communicate effectively goes nowhere and is entirely irrelevant to the morality of fuckboys, and players. The me too movement didn’t do anything. Most problems men face are created by other men. It’s in our culture as men, to be capable and c…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/21 01:46 PM
5

Ah, so you’ve been under the assumption that everyone understood tradition as being devout catholics and that photo was supposed to convey that. Oh boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 02:05 AM
5

Yeah the guy lecturing me on the English language thinks all of tradition can be conveyed in it’s entirety by a woman in the woods with a bridal veil. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 01:50 AM
8

My reading comprehension is fine. You could have just done a better job being more concise in the type of women you are looking for. For example, traditional means a lot more than some photo of a woman with a bridal veil. What exactly am I supposed to take from that? She’s willing to get married, thus she’s traditional, and opposite of super career woman? Your arrogance in bringing Sarah the math teacher into this is kinda funny lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 01:34 AM
13

You did write in English, in which you said, a woman that wants marriage and children would raise your eyebrow, even though you were already impressed by a woman which explicitly stated she didn’t want those things. Then you say you don’t want women in the middle, even though it’s clear you want a wife/family/career woman. Don’t get upset with me because your preferences all over the place.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 12:47 AM
7

You said you wanted traditional roles, while at the same time wanting someone who has promising career.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 12:29 AM
9

You want an ambitious woman to be a housewife (traditional). Good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/21 12:24 AM
9

My reason is from data, not sure where your reason comes from, or are you being sarcastic? I can’t tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/21 09:15 PM
48

The most common cause of divorce is money. Also people change over time. Who you divorce isn’t necessarily the same person you married.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/21 06:05 PM
5

Because redpill men are destroying society, it’s on women to be accountable and change dating preferences? Are you listening to yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 11:20 AM
1

I’m sorry was that supposed to be evidence or something? Because you have yet to provide anything concrete.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/21 04:58 PM
1

Lol how do you know that given being outed as gay in the past was not nearly as acceptable as it is today?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/21 10:52 AM
1

Lol So what are we arguing exactly? Because first it was rich bachelors being derided by society, now it’s specifically rich business men bachelors that people hate? So first your definition of upper class is relegated to business men, now it’s relegated to income, which includes more than business men? And according to the economic institute, net worth has absolutely nothing to do with upper class, just capital gains and income? Interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 11:07 PM
1

Lol This is your personal feelings getting in the way of reality. What Dan Bilzerian actually is doesn’t matter. It’s the image he was trying to sell, and people (men) bought that image. It’s really that simple. So what you actually meant by upper class was actually a subset of people fitting your opinion of what upper class is? And this subset of people is considered “universal” and most of society? sigh
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 10:24 PM
1

He’s company went bankrupt because it was a shit company. Which is entirely irrelevant to why he was popular to begin with. “He’s widely hated”, is that because he’s a rich bachelor fucking around? Or because he’s a fraud and a poor business man which are completely irrelevant to your point of society hating rich bachelors in and of itself?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 09:51 PM
1

Dude this is really simple stuff. He rose to fame on social media because of how he acts. I said his brand, not his failing weed businesses or how he acquired his wealth. His wealth alone didn’t make him popular amongst men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 04:04 PM
0

Nice opinion. Doesn’t change how he built his brand around a look supposedly hated by society.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 03:54 PM
–

Not really. I just thought it was funny how you couldn’t figure out the answer to your question.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 01:51 PM
–

I simply explained your case. “Leveling up” could mean anything to whoever is trying to “level up”.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 01:45 PM
–

Well who are they leveling up from? she’s left me The answer to your question.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 01:35 PM
2

Rich bachelors fucking around are universally derided by society Lol nope. I mean Dan Bilzerian made his persona literally just that. A rich bachelor surrounded by beautiful women doing whatever he wants. Not typical or even realistic for most rich bachelors, but the idea that that demographic is derided by society is bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 10:46 AM
-2

It’s not about demanding, it’s about the definition of providing, and I am seeing different than what you are regarding what is considered providing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 01:57 PM
4

I’m not talking about paying for the first date because it is not considered providing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 01:24 PM
10

Hold up. A lot of women scoff at the idea of paying for half of the expenses on ANYTHING. To them, a man providing is paying 100% needs AND wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 01:17 PM
5

I mean sure as long as he doesn’t complain about his net worth being cut in half upon divorce, or her leaving if he can no longer provide adequately.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 10:16 PM
1

Career men will gladly fuck and marry a hot, poor chick if she can take care of kids and let him do his stuff without nagging. Yeah, and that’s a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 10:03 PM
6

Yes. I don’t like pointless arguments on Reddit to take too much of my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:51 PM
3

Sure dude.🥱
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:46 PM
1

Are we talking about dating or just sex? Because I can separate women I want to take seriously long term from women I want as a fling.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:40 PM
1

Whew! This the longest “ACKCHYUALLY” I have seen. Someone give this man an award!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:36 PM
4

I don’t have a problem with women not dating down. The problem I have is men dating down. Many men have no problem whatsoever dating a women who’s simply attractive yet has very little assets. I’m not a marriage advocate at all, but marriage to a woman like that is essentially a bail out from her past life decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:24 PM
6

Funny how you feel attacked by what I said. I’m simply commenting on what I see in the manosphere regarding women of different backgrounds. I don’t disagree with everything redpill. That being said I never needed redpill ideologies to have success with women or prevent myself from being used by them. So I feel a little embarrassed for you when you call me padawan when I was most likely already a master by the time you first complained about a Stacy making you wait for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 09:20 PM
24

I will only date a career woman. A lot of redpill dudes have no clue what they want. They just like one upping women. They either complain about career women, or they fear their traditional “stay at home mom” woman uses him as a retirement fund. Pick a struggle.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 08:47 PM
10

I agree with only a few things he says. This isn’t one of them, but I’m not really too surprised he has this view. If you feel like you have to get physical with anyone in order to, “set the tone” of the relationship. Then leave. This is low IQ advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 04:42 PM
21

Men will do or say whatever to get laid. Substance on a tinder profile is hardly an indication of true intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:46 PM
11

Let’s be honest. This doesn’t apply to attractive women. Attractive women will often get the red carpet treatment and will absolutely demand to be courted because it’s simply what they can get and doesn’t make sense to accept less. I don’t know why this is taking so long to get, but other men are at fault for problems facing men, it’s not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 08:29 PM
3

Just my estimate. A ton of men have problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 06:50 PM
6

I think about 25-30% that are creeps and/or abusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 06:28 PM
–

I take it when you say “us” you mean your fellow narc?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 12:05 PM
3

I started looking at all types of shit when I first looked at porn at like 15, really had more to do with curiosity of what was out there than a preference. I’m pretty vanilla I would say. I refuse to do anal, eat ass, or any sort of butt play, threesomes etc. Oral and intercourse is all I am willing to do. So I guess for me it hasn’t affected me much if at all, but for sure some people are into weird shit that porn introduced them to.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 02:35 AM
–

I don’t think FDS holds itself to the 6 6 6 standard. I do see some women on there that do seemingly have that standard, but I don’t think it’s fair to generalize a group like that if any woman can have the 666 standard, FDS or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 02:00 AM
3

Nice strawman 👌
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 11:18 PM
5

Yeah, almost as if you’re mistaking me for someone else. Strange!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 08:42 PM
3

Far enough in which it shows some semblance of significance. If that was your measuring stick to judge women then clearly that same generalization can be applied to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 08:39 PM
2

No clue what you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 08:37 PM
4

So some women did some things, so now women don’t take accountability. Interesting logic. Starting to think this isn’t even a remotely serious discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 08:36 PM
3

Because it’s clearly incorrect. It not only shows lack of accountability, but failure to recognize what is to be accountable for.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 08:32 PM
9

The blanket generalization pretty much proves the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 08:26 PM
5

His hypothetical daughter is fucked. Best to just let hypothetical mom take over😂
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 11:07 AM
3

Hard to say. But I’ve argued with more men with fallacious reasoning than I have women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 07:08 PM
7

Because a lot of what red pill is about is self improvement. Self improvement is hard, and most men will fail at it and blame the modern women for just about everything. Modern women this, modern women that, mean while he is overweight, has a shit job, and overall just not doing anything to raise his SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 03:20 PM
4

I got it from, “usually men cheat for purely physical reasons” in contrast to, “women cheat because of a breakdown in a relationship”. Cheating for physical reasons = male hormones, women cheating = deeper emotional connection, while stringing along the SO.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 09:24 PM
10

Decisions based on physical needs aren’t void of conscious decision making. You are fully aware that cheating is a betrayal and you did it anyway. Men being capable of feeling nothing during sex with another woman is not relevant when they are cognizant of what they are doing and what it means to have sex outside a monogamous relationship. Not convinced whatsoever that a man cheating is summed up as an “oppsie forgot I was a male!” and a women cheating is a cold and calculated affair.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 09:16 PM
6

Even if they are HVM so what? If men are the gate keepers to a relationship then they are just as culpable if they cheat. If they want to exercise their options, don’t be in a monogamous relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 08:18 PM
45

Nah. Whether men can fuck someone with no feelings attached is irrelevant. We know what we are doing, when we are doing it. You either care about the consequences or you don’t care. This idea that females just fall on dick in an instant is silly. Men also have to “work” their way in.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 08:00 PM
15

That’s not reality, a large majority of women who have kids alone are financially burdened by them. I don’t even know you got the idea that single mother’s are on easy street. Most single men literally avoid single moms for this reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 10:45 AM
59

Nah. A ton of men just want sex in their prime years and only the chads can be honest with their intentions about it and still get it. Let’s stop the bs that what women are experiencing is just an illusion. A lot of ugly guys don’t even have the social skills to even keep a women that would normally not look twice at them. From what I gather, some women do give that ugly guy a chance, and then they just get arrogant. All it takes is one experience like that to never do it again.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 09:05 PM
1

Way more than 5%. I would say 10 - 20%
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/21 05:39 PM
1

Losers. Really just kinda pathetic. A lot of sugar daddies are just betas in regards to women. They yearn a woman’s touch so much that they are willing to pay for it. In another sense if the sugar daddy is actually a self made millionaire, then that can be seen as a winner. Really just depends on how you look at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 05:40 PM
2

Educated women are 90% likely to initiate divorce. I should have been more clear but I never meant to allude that divorce rates are lower or higher amongst the educated, but rather educated women are more proactive with divorce when dissatisfied. https://www.divorcemag.com/blog/why-do-women-initiate-divorce-more-than-men
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 07:46 PM
3

It’s already a statistical fact that educated women are more likely to divorce than non educated women. You think it’s due to the man when it’s in fact due to the woman having better odds in the job market due to their education, thus they are more willing to divorce and become financially independent. This education dynamic has already been studied. If I am commenting on how non educated women have lower divorce rates then it’s obviously an indirect explanation on why educated women have higher…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 02:26 PM
1

It’s not off topic. You said higher education drives up divorce rates, and i responded to that claim. So what’s the problem again?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 01:48 PM
1

The housewives with no education and no work history for the last 5 - 10 years are less likely to divorce because they wouldn’t be able to financially support themselves alone. Just because the no degree housewife won’t divorce doesn’t mean a happy marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 01:15 PM
1

I like parts of it. The best part of red pill is being accountable for your own lack of success with women, and improving yourself. Improving yourself is not even red pill specific, but it’s hands down what men need to hear. The worst part is red pill men basically manipulating women to do whatever. I like redpill to prevent getting manipulated, not to lead on and control women with low self esteem so I can have a woman for every day of the week.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/21 03:05 PM
2

Then I guess most men live a pathetic existence if your description is true. Which does not elicit sympathy from women, or more successful men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 01:14 PM
8

Lol you don’t think men change priorities in women as they get older? Men will do whatever it takes in their younger years to get sex, and when they are ready to, “settle” down, they start acting right and start looking for women they’d actually like to be seen in public with.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 11:07 AM
–

I don’t find the radicalization to be the same. A woman, “radicalized” by FDS, simply dies single. A man, “radicalized” by the manosphere, can be way more dangerous to society, than any woman. I also find men who feel betrayed by society and are active participants in these genders wars almost have nothing going for them. Failing with the opposite sex is just the icing on the cake.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 01:21 PM
4

Redpill on YouTube is stagnant. Is basically a daily digest of what some women did somewhere and why you shouldn’t date them and it’s not your fault. TheRoommates does offer actual advice. For the most part I just use redpill YouTube content as entertainment. Some of the stories being reported on are just funny to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/21 09:58 PM
2

I disagree. Date all you want, just don’t get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 09:13 PM
8

Most people are full of shit. Talk the talk and can’t walk the walk. Dating beliefs don’t change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 07:53 PM
3

Lol dude courting a woman and her deeming you fuckable afterwards is not remotely the same as paying an escort to fuck you outright when she fucked 5 other guys that day. I don’t even believe in courting but I’d rather do that than fuck with an escort.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 10:02 PM
4

Why are you comparing prostitution for men and body count for women, when men can also have high body counts? Why aren’t you comparing body count to body count?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 09:53 PM
4

I’m confused. How is paying for multiple dates even tied to anything sexual? Elaborate.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 09:50 PM
4

A guy with a high body count could just mean they’re successful with women, a guy that gets a prostitute is seen as pathetic and lacking the skills necessary to pull women accordingly. If a fact about you was public would you prefer that a high body count be disclosed or a history of paying for prostitutes?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 09:49 PM
0

Apples and oranges. You could have easily compared body count to body count. Soliciting prostitution is a whole other beast. One it’s illegal(U.S.), two, it denotes sexual depravity which causes both men and women to look down on you as pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 09:39 PM
3

Yet only one can drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes, and vote. It’s almost as if the law changes based on where we are in our life span. In other words, abortion is no different in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 09:34 PM
7

I’m all for abortion. Great for population control, and less wayward kids that grow up to be assholes that society has to deal with. People complain about abortion then turn around and shame welfare queens.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 09:09 PM
4

That’s just one definition of the word. Oxford dictionary includes that and this: the women occupying a harem; the wives (or concubines) of a polygamous man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 04:20 PM
12

You guys have some weird theories on the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 01:25 PM
11

Is there a study that women are more susceptible to believing propaganda? Because I think of AXE body spray commercials when it comes to men and fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 12:50 PM
-1

I see where you’re coming from. Perhaps I’m not so delusioned as to see male suicide as martyrs for the greater good of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 04:07 PM
4

Woes aren’t necessarily sacrifices.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 03:54 PM
1

So that’s what has got you riled up. Feminist talking points. If I knew this would upset you to the point of you trying to start an argument in two separate areas of the thread I wouldn’t have wrote anything. I can’t argue all day. You’ll have to continue your battle against feminism elsewhere soldier.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 12:03 AM
2

I can tell you have a lot of free time. Starting an argument on a separate comment lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 11:38 PM
1

I’m done debating this.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 11:36 PM
1

I said men run society, I didn’t say women have no say in it. For some reason you think that’s mutually exclusive. You already think powerful people aren’t in control, which is practically an oxymoron, and you use unions as an example, which is hilarious given their connection with politics. Looks like you need to delve into Wikipedia and educate yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 10:59 PM
1

Lol dude what you said is soooo ironic. Bringing up unions, power and history? Like how clueless can you be? Ever heard of Jimmy Hoffa? Talk about not knowing history.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 09:12 PM
1

Powerful people don’t run the show? Interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 09:05 PM
2

Never said women didn’t have a say, nor did a say they didn’t have a part. Seems like you got lost. What company do you work for? You have a role yes? But you aren’t the CEO are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 08:50 PM
2

If we lived in a world where people appointed to run society did so in a manner that’s proportional to the demographic that appointed them, I would agree with you. Alas this is reality, not la la land.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 08:41 PM
2

Yeah, and odds are they’re voting for a man. Have you done any research or am I arguing with your feelings? Government positions are dominated by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 08:23 PM
1

Men and women both contribute to society equally in both numbers and significance, everyone is heard, and all are served. Thanks for bringing me down to earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 08:12 PM
5

It’s always the pseudo intellectuals that jump in an argument like a wrecking ball, throwing around insults. I think you need to look up what apex fallacy means, and then come back when the foam around your mouth has settled. I can’t argue with a person having a manic episode.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 05:47 PM
3

Lol dude you don’t even know what an apex fallacy is. By your definition you would also be guilty given you said rich people run the world, not men. You just swapped one group for another. Apex fallacy is when a subset is assumed to represent the whole. I didn’t say most powerful people are men, thus all men are powerful. I said men run the world, not ALL men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 04:58 PM
4

Wrong. Men are biologically inclined to have more power than women just on physical differences alone. More power = more responsibility. Make up your mind. You said rich people run society, I say those rich people are mostly made up of men, then you downplay your own point by saying 99% of men aren’t rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 03:42 PM
6

Most people who are rich are men. Most government positions are occupied by men. Most leadership positions are occupied by men. Men run the world. So no, women aren’t just as responsible.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 03:31 PM
6

Men run society. So it makes sense for them to be criticized more than women. They also as you said, more likely to initiate encounters, so men are more likely to commit acts that are to be criticized. Men on nice guys deserve to be shamed, because they aren’t nice, they’re assholes. I don’t see what you’re seeing regarding women not being called out. You’re probably hanging out in the wrong spaces. The manosphere isn’t just Reddit. Kevin Samuels, alpha male strategies, all comment on the flaw o…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 02:33 PM
19

I find it strange that you think being an adult is reason enough on why anyone shouldn’t fall victim to manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/21 01:00 AM
1

I’m not saying he’s a fraud. He is simply less well rounded. Too many men, black men in particular are way too comfortable laughing at these females that call in when they probably aren’t shit either. Too many of these men, demand submission, when they don’t have shit to submit to. Kevin Samuels can bring up that point, but men haven’t been on his radar for quite some time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 02:19 PM
1

No, he was definitely coming after them. Black men in particular. I don’t mean, “coming after” with malicious intent, but purposely calling out black men to do better, hence why he offered advice to and gave harsh truths to men calling in on his show. That his since stopped, and he has moved on to the, “modern woman” because it obviously gives way more views.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 02:08 PM
1

He stopped coming after men for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 12:53 PM
3

Oh of course not. Content creators would never contort their beliefs in a manner that would maximize their revenues.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 12:35 AM
1

I mean I’m sure it happens, but I don’t see the correlation you’re making.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 12:07 AM
2

Kevin is in it for the views now. He used to have men call in just like women, but the men wised up, realized they don’t want to be made a fool out of for not having their life together. The women that call in still don’t get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/21 12:04 AM
7

I would say FDS is better if your primary goal is not getting played. Redpillwomen will for sure get you more dates and more relationships but it doesn’t mean they’ll be worth while. Makes more sense for women to read about both to be well rounded and pick and choose what strategies they want to use while dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 01:13 AM
-4

I disagree, but if I am I got the better deal anyway. No need to be sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 01:08 AM
-3

Sorry you’re short dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 12:58 AM
7

Both men and women don’t seriously date people they consider below them. The controversy of hypergamy stems from the perceived lack of loyalty. In which case, if there is nothing keeping a hypergamous woman from looking elsewhere, why would a man commit?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/21 06:32 PM
2

I find that irrelevant. There are men who are at the top percentage of their demographic regarding desire from women. What we call those men doesn’t really matter given that they exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/21 01:29 PM
1

Sure Joe.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/21 07:25 PM
2

I’m talking about men with careers. Not your dumb friends trying to get married on a low hourly wage.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/21 07:17 PM
3

Men don’t make sacrifices regarding stunting their career growth. That’s what the commenter was really saying. Married or not, husband keeps the career he likes. Women are put in a much more vulnerable position when having kids puts them out of work.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/21 03:20 PM
3

That’s one example, but not one I was using. People vary in attractiveness. Ive seen beautiful 40 and 30 year olds, and average to ugly 20 year olds. Beautiful people always have options.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 09:42 PM
3

All depends on how you take care of yourself really. There are no absolutes in dating. A woman who looks good looks good. Age 20, 30, whatever. You can’t take RP rhetoric as being 100% accurate. I think there’s some red pill stuff all men should know, but I find a lot of it to be exaggerated.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 09:01 PM
1

OP’s argument is essentially that careers of women are often too insignificant to be used as an excuse to not have children and be a mom. He tried really hard to not come off as sexist so the message got convoluted, and comes off as wrong anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 06:44 PM
1

This is what I’m talking about. If their access is limited to 49ers, than something was wrong with them. They would be doubly fucked now due to online dating in this age. And of course cat women are flawed. Both men and women have a habit of thinking they’re hot shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 02:33 PM
1

They are, both sexes can be delusional and overestimate their value.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 02:25 PM
1

Let me reword that. The potential of a mans SMV is not higher in their post wall years than their prime years. Any guy that can’t get a date in their prime years had flaw which held them back. Your friends were 20 years late in landing consistent dates with women. The fact they couldn’t do this in their 20s tells me more about them than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 12:45 AM
10

That wasn’t the point. The point is that most middle aged men’s sexual market place value is not higher than their prime years just because they make more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 12:01 AM
7

I stopped reading at the part where being in the presence of a pimp is seen as a privilege. Next level retardation.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 11:55 PM
20

It’s weird that men for some reason think they’ll all look like Brad Pitt with more money when they hit the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 11:03 PM
3

Lol He laid down all the mines and one of his kids will step on it years later and unearth shit they were never supposed to know.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/21 10:01 AM
3

You’re not wrong. A lot of men know this, they just don’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 12:57 PM
4

I use male and female depending on the context. Like for example, wants and needs that can be perceived as having biological origins.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 12:51 PM
55

Well, I’ve seen what could happen for women who had kids and gotten married in their early 20s. They get divorced, broke, unhappy and dating prospects tank, because men in that age 20-35 range would rarely settle for a single mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 09:52 PM
1

What is a “relevant human consideration”?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 02:57 AM
2

I’m not saying it should? Men already complain, women complain. Nothing changes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 02:55 AM
7

If you have a problem with it, sure, complain about it. Whether it actually sways opinion is another story.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 02:38 AM
0

Just because something isn’t fair doesn’t mean it is exempt from being criticized.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 02:16 AM
16

Tell them that.🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 09:17 PM
9

Yes, it’s almost as if public opinion isn’t an absolute deterrent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 09:16 PM
54

Lol if you think young single moms are seen as appealing, or beacons of society then you aren’t paying attention. It’s also not entirely up to them as to whether they get married. The man doesn’t want to marry them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 08:51 PM
5

Easy or not. Studies and surveys have shown more women are left dissatisfied after sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 06:25 PM
8

Men are way easier to please than women regarding to sex. So a lot of times women are disappointed, while the man satisfied. And simps giving money doesn’t just benefit the woman, or else they wouldn’t do it. They also derive a sense of pleasure from gifting them money. It’s what makes them simps.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 05:47 PM
1

Your solution is going to other countries where you’re no longer the average. I have a sense of pride, so going to these other countries you mention where average in America is seen as exceptional IMO comes off pathetic. I’m against marriage in general, but I see some delusions in your argument. Like dismissing a counter point of men being in relationships under the assumption they aren’t really happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/21 03:57 PM
1

Because in dating, the traditional role is that the man approaches and the woman either accepts or denies. This is why more woman put their requirements on their profile than men, because the men tend to approach first. Also, women who honestly have a dating profile that’s says, take me here, there, buy me this, that , aren’t taken seriously anyway. Would you take them seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 11:52 PM
1

From what I see, the problem is not the service, but rather the idea of those services not being reciprocated in proportion. If a man expects x things from a woman, the woman will expect x things in return. When there’s an imbalance, there becomes a problem. So when any man or woman states their requirements of service, there’s almost always a negative connotation, because what they would have to do to earn that service is omitted most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 11:27 PM
6

I don’t think there is any redpill mantra that states an absolute guarantee on anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 09:36 PM
0

I don’t know why you say it has to matter in an “absolute” sense for it to be a relevant area which can lower or raise your chances of attracting the women they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/21 09:19 PM
1

Fair point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 02:04 PM
1

Ask them? They all say the same thing. Being happy without men in their lives and breaking free from societal pressure to get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 02:02 PM
0

Why don’t you educate so I can give you a failing grade. Go on misogyny Jesus 🥱
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 12:47 PM
2

I don’t know. I just know a lot of men are full of shit, people are in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 12:44 PM
2

Their goal is similar to redpill. Being content without the opposite sex. Marriage to them is just a bonus.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 11:30 AM
2

That’s a lie. Redpill dudes cry a lot about women. Very few redpill men are really improving themselves and aren’t harboring some sort of vendetta towards women. But yes, a lot of women on FDS believe in courtship. I would have to be in a dark place in life to interview for a woman like I would a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/21 11:25 AM
39

I’m redpill. There are no excuses. Coerced, ultimatums, whatever. If you don’t want to get married, don’t get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 11:11 PM
23

There is no reasoning I could offer. Only she can find things which could convince her to partake in sex with a person. Same thing goes with marriage. I don’t know why men keep asking women that question when it’s the man that traditionally proposes . Ask a married man why he got married, not the wife or the person that is usually on the side that accepts the proposition. People aren’t really good at explaining the effects we have on others when we aren’t receiving them ourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 11:04 PM
2

“But is this really an issue with men today?” r/niceguys
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 11:33 PM
1

I understand how you feel about traditional dating etiquette. However, I am certainly not a “traditional” man. I don’t plan on treating the person I’m dating as the “prize”, but someone I am interested in getting to know and will do my best not to embarrass them or disrespect them in any way. I also don’t expect them to treat me as the “prize” either. With all that being said, if I plan on going 50/50, I would let them know ahead of time. I’m not going to surprise them once the check comes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/21 06:55 PM
1

I’m not arguing that men have a higher risk tolerance. I’m saying that statistic for gambling, talks about problem gamblers, when the original comment was toward all gamblers.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 02:38 PM
1

That numbered statistic is with “problem” gamblers. Not simply men or women who participate in gambling.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 02:32 PM
160

You know I am redpill and I don’t agree with a lot of what FDS says, but where is this anger coming from? I don’t understand why some men go on this war path over dating principles. You still seem to be in some sort of “phase” to honestly be this bothered about women you don’t care to associate with.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 07:38 PM
2

I don’t know what more to say. How you define privilege is not within the scope of the definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 05:11 PM
3

We are looking at the same definition. No where is there a mention of a governing body or a law having to be present to enforce privilege. The dictionary is not the problem, your interpretation of it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 04:55 PM
2

I don’t see how this changes anything. Any one advantage by itself may not be a privilege but the collective advantages that men are most likely to have can be a privilege in itself. The definition also states clearly that a privilege does not have to be granted, it can simply be available.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 04:41 PM
5

I think you need to read the definition of privilege. noun a special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 04:09 PM
1

I don’t see how omnipotence is contradictory or how it is mutually exclusive to omniscience.
/r/MGTOW228/04/21 05:49 PM
2

Because a large portion of men that say they’re MGTOW really aren’t. A lot of them use the group to vent their frustrations with women amongst their peers. They haven’t really understood what it means to go their own way, because they keep looking back at what women are, saying, doing, or feeling.
/r/MGTOW227/04/21 04:22 PM
1

There’s a wall. What’s funny to me is the common perception amongst men that they age like fine wine. Although it’s true that women after a certain point age twice as fast as men, a ton of men don’t even have a prime body in their prime and think they can bag any women as they get older because their income increases. Which is weird given that a lot of these same men can’t stand gold diggers.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 02:04 PM
6

I doubt that application of the definition will be broadened to include broken promises, but it seems like this is a hill you want to die on.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 10:33 PM
4

Although it fits the definition. Rape by deception is applied only in exceptional cases for obvious reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 10:24 PM
16

From one man to another, you come off as a narcissist. I don’t have trouble getting women either, but I don’t think I have quite the ego you have for someone that can’t get a women you deem acceptable on attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/21 07:09 PM
2

Dude you wrote way too much about yourself. First, I never assumed you were ugly, I just said the assumption you made about the physical attractiveness of the majority of WGTOW can be applied to MGTOW. Not helpful at all and is the same shame tactic used against men that Ugly = Angry. Anyway, my main point was that men often say there going their own way yet willingly jump in the trenches to go to war against women, when there supposed to be walking away from it while being apathetic to whatever…
/r/MGTOW225/04/21 06:41 PM
0

Same thing can be said about MGTOW. Just mostly ugly societal rejects that can’t stand women because they can’t get them. No point in shaming them, they’re going their own way. It’s their path, that works for them. Weird how that key concept is lost. Too many people get caught up in the battle of the sexes BS.
/r/MGTOW225/04/21 01:17 PM
1

Independence and strength doesn’t mean not being submissive. Submissive ≠ dependence, strength ≠ combative. A person who leads doesn’t make the followers weak either.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 01:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter