TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Code_Name_D Archive

View 9 posts and 60 comments by Code_Name_D on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Agreed. But I would also add that the stakes have gone up considerably for failure. A failing proposition is not just about rejection, but could be interpreted as sexual harassment. And in the work place, this comes with huge consequences. Adding to this, most work places have a total probation in co-worker fraternization, even off the clock, that could result in termination. I suspect it must the similar on campus. Remember elevator gate, where simply inviting her out for a coffee was interpret…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 03:07 AM
1

To be fair, the report did say the sample size for male rape victims was limited and expressed that skepticism was justified. The report did focus exclusively on female victims. It's notable the figures were included at all.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:56 AM
1

This seems to be the narrative of the Counter-spin piece on the subject. http://fair.org/counterspin-radio/lindsay-beyerstein-on-rolling-stone-rape-controversy-amitabh-pal-on-bhopal/ The line here was that "Jackie's story still isn't false and campus rape is still a problem - despite no evidence to support the allegation."
/r/MensRights08/12/14 12:49 AM
1

For those of you who may not be aware, David Packman is an independent journalist, and a good one of all appearances. He will go into detail in the video. But the short of the story is that he recently interviewed several persons involved with Gamer gate, including Brianna Wu, and then allowed Milo Yiannopoulus to respond to some of Wu’s more outrageous accusations. There are defiantly strong opinions regarding Packman’s open mindness. Some insisting that he is ani-gamer gate in that he did thro…
/r/MensRights18/11/14 01:30 AM
2

These are extremely good interviews, not pulling his punches for either side. I wish we had more reporters like this.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:12 AM
1

Sounds like something he would say though.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 06:10 PM
0

No one is disputing this. What is at issue here is that feminist use being cat called as an example of male oppression and harassment when in reality the majority of these examples of just people being sociable or expressing a genuine complement.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 05:48 PM
2

Examples might be: Watch your step. Could you spare a dollar? Do you have the time? Help! The building is on fire? Have you see this lost puppy?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:37 AM
6

I suppose the men should just look at the ground as she walks by. What right dose mere mortal men have to gaze upon a goddess, right? Seriously, she is practically dressed as a hooker, and then wonders why she gets cat called. Notice how the other women are dressed? What if she was to dress more conservatively and then walk down the same street? Do you think she would get the same reaction? Of what if she was dressed as a clown, you know the rainbow wig, big floppy shoes, the works; what sort of…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:05 AM
8

Being told "have a nice day" is a cat call?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:49 AM
1

You seem to ask more questions than observations. Nothing wrong with that, any good dialog frequently starts with questions. And here are the one I would offer. What is sexism and/or sexists? (Or how would you define it.) Is that (how you define it) a good, bad, neutral, or complex idea? With much of your dialog, you take mostly as a given that society is “sexist.” But without further context, I have no idea what that means, and thus can not say if it’s a good or bad thing. Do keep in mind I am …
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:41 AM
2

There sure a lot of “don’t do this”, but I don’t see any advice on how not to be creepy. It doesn’t even really explain what creepy is beyond the observation that she doesn’t seem to be interested. My second observation is that this is a feminist magazine and the audience is likely to be mostly female. I haven’t done any research mind you, but when I do pick up such a magazine like “Red Book” at the doctors office, it seems to predominantly consist of “advice for men” which is to be conveyed to …
/r/MensRights22/10/14 02:33 AM
0

“The left” is what ever the heck you want it to be. So the notion that feminism is the left or that the left is feminism is a non-starter. Both words are just empty place holders which allow politicians to evade real discussion over real issues.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 01:40 AM
2

It doesn’t just come across as fake pseudo-intellectual, most of the time I have no idea what this guy is even talking about. It’s not even a good rant. I have no problem with the filters, but the cigarette in one hand boos in the other, while sitting in his easy chair made me cringe. It reminded me of one MRA’s rants that I saw with how he never objectivied women while having posters of half naked girls on the wall behind him. Spending so much time on style and little on substance.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:20 PM
0

Oh yay, attacking my spelling is such a devastating response. Makes the name calling seem almost mature in comparison.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:02 AM
0

As in most cases of people called Olive, Richard was a she not a he. As for who she was, the article tells you that. Actually, I just didn’t give one flying fig. But apparently you didn’t catch that. But sense your response was so articulate and thoughtful, I thought I might take a closer look. So, you are saying that i am lying about the quotes? Or was he lying to us? I don’t know. Are you lying? If only there was a way for me to know for sure. In a 1940 Family Circle interview with Olive Richa…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:48 AM
1

Wow, what a horrible hit piece. It’s not even about Wonder Woman as he spends more time going after Olive Richard – whom ever he is. I disagree that Wonder Woman was created as a feminist Icon as feminism was very different back then. And the notion that William Marston created Wonder Woman as superior to men is quite laughable. But she was among the first, if not the first female super hero in a field that was drowning in male super heroes. Narston did at least let Wonder Woman be the stronger …
/r/MensRights20/08/14 06:05 AM
-1

Sorry, but the guy has zero credibility with me. He is wrong on just about every thing else he argues, why should I accept him here?
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:00 AM
0

Yes, but that computer generated image is a hypothetical actual being, so hypothetically it has a gender. When Steve is called Steve and has a goatee it's pretty clear what gender Steve hypothetically is. If you want to bitch about semantic shit then we should just stop talking about gender, because it's not even a real thing, it's an abstract attribute that we made up, so it doesn't exist in the real world. Wow! Only three sentences here and you still managed to contradict yourself. So which is…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:30 PM
0

Steve is a computer generate image – IT has no gender, and is incapable of even having one. If it has a gender, it’s because we impose one on it. Not unlike how we impose a gender on a baby simply because it’s rapped in a blue or pink blanket. But with that said; players clearly imply a specific gender to their avatar. So why the hostility towards also having the shape of the avatar reflect the gender as well. So why retained an arguably androgynous shape for Steve? Its not like the avatar is al…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:42 PM
1

I don't see it. Then again it might help if I am shown an actual argument. All I have seen thus far is the assertion.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:40 AM
2

Which is why eloquence is also highly prized.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:09 AM
-1

Remember, if she was drunk - than she is incapable of giving consent.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 06:18 AM
0

Hmm, Why do I get the feeling that you have just repeated Dawkins's mistake with that one. Maybe if she was eye raped by a stranger....
/r/MensRights31/07/14 06:13 AM
2

This is rather humorous. Dawkins has always been a vocal advocate for feminism. A point that was clearly displayed with the row with Atheism Plus as he clearly and vocally sided with the feminists. In fact it was partly his endorsement of feminism which prevented me from looking more closely into MRA. So it must be quite the shock to suddenly find him self thrown under the bus in this way. Was he being deliberately provocative? I don’t think so. In fact I don’t see any thing overtly inflammatory…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 06:09 AM
3

Wow! It’s as they say, if you got nothing, you will turn up empty handed. I was thinking that when they said movies contained rape culture, I was thinking that – well – you know – would actually involve rape. Hah, silly me. The first example: Apparently standing outside a girls window holding up a boom box playing their song is stalking. Really? Professing your love for a girl – is stalking. Talk about argument from absurdity. Second example: Crazy Stupid Love; one of the secondary characters tr…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 11:27 PM
1

Googal really is your friend. Heck just searching you-tube turned up a wealth of information, proving nearly every aspect of this story to be wrong. While there appears to be consensus that the Y chromosome has lot a lot of its genetic material over its existence, those events have happened across significant speciation, but has not happened within our species or our closest relatives. As far as humans are concerned, the Y chromosome is very stable. Scientists no longer believe the Y chromosome …
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:03 AM
4

Really? This is what passes for science?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:31 PM
3

There are some thought provoking ideas here, but I do get the sense we are trying to over think this. A rock is a rock because it is incapable of being anything else. But as people, we can chose who we wish to be. But when that decision is imposed on us by fate, we seem to have difficulty grasping what the rock knows intuitively. The disposable male is something of an evolutionary legacy. Men are larger, stronger because this was a biological imperative to protect the more venerable members of t…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:57 AM
1

That would be a no
/r/MensRights25/07/14 09:36 PM
2

Well if you follow the comic, you would know that Sandra dose carry a torch for Cloud. She has even been known to have a few fantasies about him, but for the most part she is too shy and unsure of herself to share her feelings. So I think she was just being a bit shy and confused her. Here is another peek at their relationship http://www.sandraandwoo.com/comics/2013-08-12-0503-paradise-falls.png
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:26 AM
1

The Economic Policy Institute has very high standards for its submission. I refer to it often lend it a great deal of credibility. For the most part, they are extremely critical of mainstream economics. It only occurred to me to today to search its sight to see what it says regarding the wage gap. Keep in mind that here at least, the wage gap mostly referees to the income gap between economic classes and wage classes. Most of the submissions filed under “wage gap” are along this topic, mostly ig…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:30 AM
2

Ohhhh, I learned something new. There is such a thing as a female kilt. Kilts tend to be made from a flat open piece of cloth, usually folded over on the right side. Skirts are sown together to make a tube of fabric. All though I have seem them with simply a large pleat of cloth that gives the appearance of an open hem. Thus any thing with an open hem is called a kilt, weather worn by a male or female. But males will compensate with the sporran above the crotch. (Yes, the sporran can cover a gre…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:59 AM
2

Not an unfair question.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:46 AM
-1

So you aren't going to read it then. -sigh- try to help a guy out. I will let you get back to your quote mining then.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:28 AM
0

Go back and read the article as that is NOT what it says.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:21 AM
3

At the academic level, sure, But at our level (laymen), there is no real way to know for sure. We are being presented with dueling statistics here and there are a lot of devils dancing around in these details. Regardless of which side is being presented, there is no way to know for sure if that presentation is trying to spin the numbers, or if they are genuinely trying to answer the question. Heck, even the data itself may be misleading, including self selective factors that haven’t been identif…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:36 AM
6

He went for the jugular today.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 10:51 PM
5

“Ban bossy”, “never say you are sorry”, and the “like a girl” campaigns all imagine victimization or persecution where none exist. It’s how they maintain the illusion of the patriarchy, by inventing these mechanisms which imagines a false narrative of subjugation.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 11:55 PM
1

Up next, Thunderfoot goes after the video that is critical of "tom-boys".
/r/MensRights20/07/14 06:03 PM
2

I disagree. With the Dove Evolution which covers photos shopping a girl’s face, I believe Thunder’s criticism is off base attempting to go after this video – mostly because the video is vague on what its opinion is. It’s simply a girl’s face becoming photoshoped and ending up looking completely unlike her original appearance. Is this good, bad; all the video tells us is “no wonder our sense of beauty is distorted.” It leaves a great deal to interpretation. Its more like an observation, rather th…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 08:08 AM
2

Ah, you do know this is the Onion, right?
/r/MensRights19/07/14 09:57 PM
1

Oh no! I got caught in the act! Have mercy on me Law Bot, have mercy!
/r/MensRights12/07/14 06:21 AM
1

"I don't know how to make the world a better place without holding women accountable for choosing assholes. If women chose nice guys, we would have a peaceful world." Stefan Molyneux did indeed say this. http://youtu.be/Qyw3JwDcHZE?t=3m2s He said this while having a conversation with a caller who was asking for advice about his abusive father. Molyneux’s response was to blame the mother for having sex with is father. And I agree with Paul for admonishing the statement. This is typical from Liber…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 06:15 AM
2

Quite true, the MRA community can’t stay hidden for ever, and sooner or later would have to engage. But there are many ways to do so, with some being better than others with specific circumstances. There are right ways and wrong ways to go about these things.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 10:06 PM
2

Maybe I will see it when I get a chance to go over it again.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:58 AM
11

I just watched the debate and here are some of my initial thoughts. Paul did better than I thought he would, so it looks like I under-estimated him. He clearly had a plan going into the debate, which was to hold Matt accountable for some of the things he said on the air. And he stuck to that plan, or at least as much as he could. But it’s also clear Matt also had a plan. Right out of the gate he shoots for the classic bait and switch with a quote mine from Stefan Molyneux. (Was he aloud to speak…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:05 AM
1

I just watched the debate and here are some of my initial thoughts. Paul did better than I thought he would, so it looks like I under-estimated him. He clearly had a plan going into the debate, which was to hold Matt accountable for some of the things he said on the air. And he stuck to that plan, or at least as much as he could. But it’s also clear Matt also had a plan. Right out of the gate he shoots for the classic bait and switch with a quote mine from Stefan Molyneux. (Was he aloud to speak…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 04:01 AM
2

For those who may be interested, here is that debate between Seder and Stefan Molyneux http://youtu.be/0vVW1t900Jg
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:28 AM
2

Oh that I know.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:17 AM
1

Ah, thanks for the heads up. It should be quite the train wreck. Even if I do not know who will jump the tracks first. Elam may pull this out of the fire yet - If he has the discipline to stay in control of the message that is. Hot headed ideologs are not hard to expose when you know which buttons to push and how to drive a point home. Elam certain has a formidable command of the subject, I will give him that much. If the moderator stays neutral, and so long as there is no attempt to manipulate …
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:16 AM
5

I would mostly agree with one minor quibble. Most progressives are uncritical of feminism because they have not been exposed to any contrary opinions that would challenge it. And what they have been exposed to (including my self until recently), especially data-wise, tends to support a more denatured feministic view point (IE coffee-shop feminism.) And they are certainly not exposed to actual feminist theory or argument. (Assuming that there is a cogent or consistent argument to be had. There se…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:04 AM
3

Matt Binder is a frequent guest host and substitute for Sam Seder for his show, the Majority Report, which it probably one of the most significant and well known voices from the left. He makes a living point out the corruption and hypocrisy that runs ramped in Republican Circles and will not hesitate to pull Obama and other Democrats to the wood shed when they step out of line (which is actually rather frequent.) And as a progressive myself, I am a regular listener. Seder is not perfect, but the…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 12:17 AM
3

Whoa, what where you aim that snark. Don't go shooting the messenger here.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 11:57 PM
0

Yes, Binder is a major blowhard here. He doesn’t impress me in the least. Even when he is discussing a subject I am sympathetic too. And when he rants anti-MRA, who goes into full Shawn Hanity mode and not in a good way. A few days ago, while on the Sam Seder’s “Majority Report.” Binder made an open challenge to debate some one from the MRA community. In my opinion, Binder is not being genuine with his offer. Along with his “challenge” he said, and I am paraphrasing here, that his intention was …
/r/MensRights09/07/14 11:56 PM
1

My observation is that there may be some base ignorance at work here. In a recent debate, my opponent defended this by arguing it as an “anatomical necessity.” In other words, she reasoned that “made to penetrate” was nonsensical because if he was unwilling, the penis would be flaccid and unable to penetrate. And if it’s rigged, it is to be interpreted as consent or intent on the part of the male. “He must really want it if its hard” sort of thing. Coss is likely operating from the same mis-conc…
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:16 PM
2

I agree. But also have to question weather its true. Not that bars tend to let women in for free, I have seen that first hand. Heck, I have even seen where bars will give women free drinks. But I have also seen bars that don’t offer these perks and they seem to be doing fine. And I also wonder if there is evidence that letting women in for free will attract male patrons? There may also be some historical artifacts at work here, a hold over from probation perhaps. In the past, it was never proper…
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:47 PM
2

The problem I have with this is that is too broad a statement to be examined meaningfully. Are we talking about how men like to buy women flowers? Or are we also including non-social transitions? Are we to include or exclude living arrangements? A stay-at-home mom gets a lot of “free stuff” from her husband who is the bred winner. Do we consider “free stuff” to include trinkets like being given the teddy bare when her date wins it at a carnival, or meaningful transactions such as real estate or …
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:37 PM
3

She makes the observation that Academic Studies self promotes itself as “Activism”, and she is right to argue that an activism footing will compromise the academic quality. They start with the conclusion and work to build the case around confirmed those conclusions. All though I do find it odd that it’s a conservative who is making this argument. (If only they would use that conclusion to challenge the many preconceived notions that makes up conservative and libertarian thinking.) Beyond that ob…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 01:46 AM
1

I am hoping to get some answers or observations here.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 12:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter