TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Codename-18 Archive

View 6 posts and 703 comments by Codename-18 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
43

Exactly. Plain and simple shaming in order to trigger overcompensation
/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:30 PM
5

They're grasping at straws
/r/MensRights11/03/26 09:54 AM
1

Respecting women, if anything, ACCELERATES that process. Especially if she's fuelled by hubris and thinks she can pull a stunt, well she will
/r/MensRights07/03/26 07:36 PM
1

Maybe nursery and midwifery, and even then men or women nurses are usually psychopathic people who won't help. The rest is crap. Teaching is broken, it's all politics and no facts. Counselling doesn't work, they teach you shit like "open communication" that's empirically false.
/r/MensRights07/03/26 08:23 AM
16

The dialectical gymnastics to try and sugarcoat it are crazy lol Tell me one job that's more "meaningful" than creating the infrastructure of society - which is done by men.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 04:35 AM
5

Restore all the things the accused suffered + years in jail. Even to the extreme. Let's say someone accuses you of being a pedo, your wife has an abortion but she wouldn't have had it without the accusations. Then it turns out it was fake, then IMO the death penalty is appropriate. We need to tackle the consequences of the false accusations, not just a lump sum of years behind bars
/r/MensRights03/03/26 12:09 PM
7

Because at the top of the victimhood pyramid there can only be one spot. Everyone who gets his share of problems acknowledged threatens your market share. If you're dumb enough like them your brain will short-circuit
/r/MensRights03/03/26 12:02 PM
-1

Because as much as we like to call ourselves evolved, we're no better than other animals. And opportunities are what dictate a man's behaviour. Imagine if most men who are not swimming in it used rationality to come to that conclusion. "Hey guys you wanted equality and the blank slate equalism. Therefore, if both are drunk it is both parties' fault". They wouldn't change anything but they'd be punished for saying so. Sometimes it's a survival mechanism. And people play dirty unless they can affo…
/r/MensRights03/03/26 03:09 AM
1

Just identify as one of them and go for it
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:54 PM
1

The premise doesn't hold water. If men wouldn't give up power, then WTF have they toiled and died for millennia just to shelter women? It would have been enough to use violence to enslave them, but it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 08:04 AM
1

That's not true. It can be a zero-sum game, by your logic people slaving off 16 hours/day for a pitta ce during the industrial revolution, that's not a big deal because factory owners were making a profit. But not for non-autistic people, you could get that information elsewhere without there being a mafia-like department. Maybe in the US some of the things HR does can fly, but in Europe you could still sue. The thing is HR will always side with the company, they're not a Court of law
/r/MensRights24/02/26 12:41 PM
2

No HR provides no benefit for society. They actually safeguard the company's interests at the expense of employees. They employ bullying tactics all the time, in economics if you pay someone for a task they are considered to be on your side by default. In practice HR is the company's stooge
/r/MensRights23/02/26 06:57 PM
2

MRA's should start issuing certifications of MRA and do business and interact with other MRA's. Something like a closed community, and then expand.
/r/MensRights23/02/26 06:44 AM
2

Which contributions to society do jobs like secretaries, HR and life coaches give?
/r/MensRights23/02/26 06:36 AM
4

Yeah that's your cope. Women aren't hurt only when the welfare system is supported by men's labour. Men-built infrastructure, economic surplus that's mostly created by men. Women by and large choose cushy jobs and that's only possible in an advanced society that was created by men. Go to Asia and try the game on hard mode if you'd like
/r/MensRights22/02/26 08:31 AM
1

Lol how's feminism different from fascism? Now she'll be investigated and fired
/r/MensRights21/02/26 07:01 AM
6

You're a fucking genius. Here's the solution! MGTOW can just claim they're gay (in public) while secretly going their own way. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 08:42 AM
3

Wait a min, isn't a rapist a woman-adjacent person?
/r/MensRights17/02/26 05:37 PM
-3

Ok but imagine WW2 you either have a small army consisting of volunteers or you have an entire country. Option 1 is a small.army, option 2 is a big one. Of course I'm against mandatory conscription but once they take you to the frontline without your will you'll still HAVE TO fight for your survival so the big army prevails
/r/MensRights17/02/26 05:25 PM
-5

They don't but I agree with the concept
/r/MensRights17/02/26 04:53 PM
35

What is a fake man? If the Ministry is willing to say that a few "real" men are left, he should also be capable of explaining to the people what a fake man is.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 01:05 PM
289

The freest and yet simultaneously most damaging choice a man can make to a woman is to go his own way. They can't razionalise away that "my body, my choice" is intrinsically valid when it comes to men because a man who doesn't date won't spend on her, won't marry her, won't get alimony-non-consensual-sex'd, won't pay off a mortgage for the house she's staying in while also paying for his own rent. In one move you make the system crumble. This is tantamount to not being able to opt out of society…
/r/MensRights17/02/26 12:51 PM
97

Issues like: Conscription Paternity Fraud Alimony or its lack thereof Child support or child custody The allocation of State-owned resources to fight gender-specific diseases Are all zero-sum games. You can't "fight for both" without creating winners and losers.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 09:48 AM
12

Suicide attempts don't count. Change my mind.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 07:48 PM
30

Women weaponise their incompetency in the workplace, fail to earn more money than their men do and prefer hypergamy over busting their own asses. And even the successful ones want a man who's more successful, there's no.better example of weponisation than that
/r/MensRights29/01/26 04:33 PM
9

Not every boy is stronger than every woman
/r/MensRights25/01/26 01:28 PM
1

No there shouldn't be any criteria like the ones you posted above, just his signature on a paper
/r/MensRights24/01/26 03:56 PM
3

Because women are the selectors. The selectors can hardly ever be empathetic, in fact not selecting means a generic dead-end. So you need to create social rationalisations (conventions) to cope with who you are. But you have a weakness for shiny things and your own impulses (boredom, hunger, willingness to explore, travel etc). Men knew this so they created hierarchies based on merit and the most conscientious or powerful or smart would get the wherewithal to reproduce. But wealthy isn't synonym…
/r/MensRights20/01/26 11:00 AM
20

Yeah but TBF they had the chance to say no and also the chance not to lie about it
/r/MensRights20/01/26 10:45 AM
3

Paternity testing
/r/MensRights09/01/26 08:48 AM
1

Nope
/r/MensRights08/01/26 10:54 PM
12

Women are in the aggregate, although there might be exceptions, against DNA testing. Men are in the aggregate, although there might be exceptions, in favour of DNA testing. Can you, OP, show us a way to combine these 2 positions or is it an entirely passive-aggressive post? You see, in real life men's and women's interests are adversarial, so the middle ground fallacy doesn't really hold water.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 05:39 PM
2

I disagree, you guys have a tendency to change things from within the system. Yet can you name one country who was funded not because of a war, revolution, irredentism, insurgency, upheaval etc? Feminism didn't come about with pacific means, men will not attain anything just by talking. But of course the movement is too weak to rally the streets. We need to start boycotting and discarding people based on identity (which is loyalty under a different guise), pretty much as feminism does. The claim…
/r/MensRights07/01/26 02:12 PM
35

They'll sue you anyway. Once I considered the possibility very seriously, I received 70+ requests but I'm not gonna let the future mother of my kids compete with flaky others or outright overlook me cause some friend or lesbian tricked me
/r/MensRights05/01/26 04:50 PM
2

No, you didn't. Watch out for that mindset, it's dangerous. Consider whether you're the best option, that's all that matters
/r/MensRights31/12/25 04:18 PM
28

Because victimhood is a pyramid, nobody wants to give their market share to a competitor. Especially since lower echelons receive far less empathy and material aid
/r/MensRights31/12/25 04:12 PM
1

In theory no. In practice women hardly ever go for paretian outcomes. Everything is a zero-sum game so if you grant women more power just because, they will exploit it to the detriment of men. So, yes it will be very misandriatic
/r/MensRights29/12/25 08:45 PM
3

Any word beyond 'yes' is superfluous
/r/MensRights17/12/25 06:10 PM
3

Unfortunately men can't unite because hypergamy. At least this is my opinion. If men unionised for real then the top ones get all the kitty, in fact beta men have always found it convenient to vehemently oppose masculinity so as to signal affiliation. I wish it were possible, but in the big numbers it's not
/r/MensRights16/12/25 08:48 PM
16

Voters = Women + the elderly. It doesn't affect both so that's why
/r/MensRights15/12/25 10:57 PM
10

A revolution is long due
/r/MensRights14/12/25 07:29 AM
1

Fair. However, challenging one's opinion by checking if it measures up to a factual substantiation of one's beliefs has always been at the core of masculinity. One man kind of has to prove with actions that he's serious about a given thing. The burden of performance is what differentiates men from women in a society. I don't think feminist men usually pass the bullshit test.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 05:27 PM
54

So if she crosses the road in a foggy night in the middle of nowhere and you slam your brakes but still end up running her over it's still first degree murder?
/r/MensRights11/12/25 08:31 AM
1

Allowed his girlfriend? Wow, feminists would melt over this
/r/MensRights06/12/25 10:53 PM
6

I've been suffering from anhedonia for basically all my life. I can get women without any problem but having sex feels like touching your left hand with your right one
/r/MensRights06/12/25 10:51 PM
7

100% of cuckoldry is committed by women. At least homicide only ends you, not your entire lineage
/r/MensRights04/12/25 03:44 PM
14

Every unregulated ideology brings chaos. So cheating is rape because Oh well person A tells person B that if person B cheats person A doesn't want anything to do with person B anymore. Of course person A can't prevent person B from cheating because it's person B's body and person B's choice. Person B cheats. Person B doesn't tell person A, and they have sex. Person B didn't have person A's consent. Now the same feminists will have a breakdown.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 09:48 PM
3

Today I read that a woman was given 41 years in jail for baking cupcakes with her husband's cum and offering it to kids, on Facebook everyone was laughing and saying the sentencing was too harsh and despite my best efforts nobody saw that another as sexual assault or even trauma
/r/MensRights15/11/25 08:20 PM
1

I disagree, argue with women but point out their physical flaws instead of engaging in conversation, it always works
/r/MensRights10/11/25 07:26 PM
6

Because men's and women's strategies are adversarial. Can't have it both ways. Sorry, not sorry. Even if you become a pillar of the community there will be times in which one side will push for more and the same degeneracy will be perpetuated.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 04:22 PM
7

We don't owe them shit. And society doesn't exist, it's just a myriad of personal interests, in this the West is leading the world for the simple fact that the acknowledgement of people's self interest and how it motivated them to act in a 'market' is what brings prosperity about. But don't rely on 'society' it doesn't exist and it's not there to save you in dire times, anything can and will be taken away from you unless you are ready to defend it, don't abdicate that responsibility to 'society'…
/r/MensRights04/11/25 04:20 PM
1

The Italian constitutional court has ruled out that the 'victim's' word is now proof so the "he said, she said" thing is no more, she said and that's evidence. France is following up very close
/r/MensRights01/11/25 07:30 PM
1

He probably didn't expressly consent either
/r/MensRights01/11/25 07:26 PM
33

They lost credibility after being the top search on PornHub
/r/MensRights31/10/25 07:39 AM
7

Lol MRA's are notoriously mentally cucked for allowing free speech. I've been advocating for strategy for years and it seems like men don't really want to win. Or to put it better, men want to win by abiding by virtue and principles - which won't make you win in the real world. I also think that OP's in bad faith, because which metric did you use to reach those conclusions? I quadruple dare you to use the same metrics on feminists and it's clear that the ones living in an echo camber are them.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 06:39 AM
1

Italian, it's called "reverential fear" roughly translated. It is explicitly stated that it cannot be compared to any threat or abuse since there is no element of violence or threat or the like. It's just you being afraid I would do X and that's on you, not on me to quell your hidden and unspoken anxiety. But if it's strong enough it could lead to the annulment (if you prove it) of a contract for example. Innocent until proven guilty is a myth in the entire west, it's always the other way around…
/r/MensRights14/10/25 12:43 PM
2

Thank goodness in my culture "fear" cannot be leveraged as a way to manipulate others. Students fear this, parents fear that. It's on them. We even have an article stating that if you're afraid of me then I can't be prosecuted because as long as I don't commit a crime I'm innocent, and also because you could weaponise imaginary fears. I bet those 'fears' are just the fact that people are calling out what's going on.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 06:07 AM
59

There was a woman in Italy who killed her own baby for being autistic. Thousands of messages of support, I kid you not. And obviously it was the State's fault as well as the patriarchy's for not helping her, it wasn't that in the animal kingdom the female priorities the well being of her strong offspring at the expense of the others, especially first born ones.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 06:53 PM
5

Source?
/r/MensRights08/10/25 09:44 PM
3

Are you for real? Women have all the incentives to snowflake and portray themselves as non-sexual beings until they find the right guy like you and shit. All the while they were extremely sexual with past partners and with the men they cheat with. She doesn't benefit from saying "nice dick, it's bigger than yours! Now I feel like masturbating thinking of all those 4somes I had back in the day".
/r/MensRights06/10/25 11:11 AM
2

Not necessarily to OP but to any random reader, if you advocate for dialogue and Pacific change please name me one country in history that hasn't come about either via war, or insurgency, irredentism, civil war, revolution and the like. It's countries themselves that were created like this and you want to change a part of a country by talking smoothly?
/r/MensRights06/10/25 11:07 AM
3

We need to investigate the causal nexus OP. A lot of men play video game in which you steal, kill, and commit all sorts of criminal acts YET the ones doing it in real life are a minuscule fraction of 1%. So yeah corn does mess up with your brains but you still retain a lot of brain power and don't bang your step-sister while your step-mother is going down on you both IRL
/r/MensRights29/09/25 09:40 AM
0

One of my girlfriends keeps sending me pics of men choking women, my ex was into being chocked and BDSM. A lot of women like that shit, I really don't but have to adapt or lose, basically. Those perversions are very real
/r/MensRights29/09/25 09:36 AM
13

Bro' never heard of coopetition. If you don't preach the Gospel feminism and LGBT happens, so men are all better off sharing the truth
/r/TheRedPill25/09/25 08:25 PM
5

One of the strongest indicators of lack of masculinity and weakness is to adopt female logic, like the inversion of causes and consequences. It's becoming a trend now where someone baits/provokes/bullies/shames you and then people use your reaction to justify the prior action. As if time flowed backwards. Remember, it's ok to posthumously evaluate your behaviour but you wouldn't have snapped had she not been a bully, so it's her fault. Don't beat yourself up
/r/MensRights16/09/25 08:12 PM
1

This should be the norm
/r/MensRights13/09/25 03:19 PM
3

As an economist I see this as a way to artificially inflate the numbers. There simply isn't enough supply of rapes for the State's demand so what do they do? They change the rules. They did it already by shifting from "no means no" to "yes means yes". They did it with racism which doesn't mean anything anymore. They'll do it again in order to sustain the system by taking innocent lives
/r/MensRights12/09/25 12:57 PM
-4

I'm 5'9, 40 years old and my notch count is high-end 3 digits. So spit that fucking black pill and move somewhere else
/r/MensRights11/09/25 08:31 PM
4

Your biggest mistake was being apologetic. It was a frame test. Science is by its nature "confrontational" because everything can be disproven at any given time and a better theory comes along. But you must also understand that even science is politicised nowadays
/r/MensRights09/09/25 10:44 PM
1

Sure, a Pareto betterment is when something can be changed at no cost for a party but it would bring a benefit to another, since it is a net positive it should be done in order to achieve the social good. Women are masters though at creating zero-sum games, a Pareto betterment can also be described as a non-zero-sum game.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 01:34 PM
30

No. Because feminists CANNOT - I didn't say "do not" - care for men's issues NOR do they grasp the concept of Pareto betterments So even if in theory you could be working simultaneously on both, in practice you'll be ostracised by society
/r/MensRights04/09/25 04:22 PM
10

An article based on ONE woman's recollection lol
/r/MensRights31/08/25 05:25 PM
1

It's just you being too emotionally invested to receive some criticism. It's clear and concise
/r/TheRedPill27/08/25 09:02 AM
1

Sorry but this post is BluePill AF. You wrote like a real feminist would, congrats! These assumptions are unproved: "she's tired to always be the one veering the motional wheel" "She no longer has to think for both of you" And the icing on the cake is the "who hurt you?" part. It's a very well known fact that women throw the "who hurt you?" invalidating argument as a non sequitur, and in this case it's the same. Unless you prove someone's bad faith every "who hurt you?" is just data that disprov…
/r/TheRedPill27/08/25 05:03 AM
1

They're running out of slaves at the plantation it seems? Let's bait them with prenups only to toss them away in court
/r/MensRights26/08/25 03:18 PM
2

No, that's rape. If you were X and now (let's say) you're Y then the other person should be informed or it's rape.
/r/MensRights26/08/25 02:42 PM
3

False allegations are the reason why we need guns. Sadly, I'm European 😕
/r/MensRights26/08/25 02:07 PM
1

Can you prove the link between catcalling and unsafety?
/r/MensRights19/08/25 11:32 AM
1

It's called oikophobia, I read a book about it
/r/MensRights19/08/25 11:28 AM
7

Who?
/r/MensRights16/08/25 01:59 PM
28

In many countries it would be illegal for the police to elicit a given reaction and manufacture crimes, that would be doing their duty in bad faith. Apparently in the UG that's ok
/r/MensRights15/08/25 09:41 PM
6

Yes, I can blame them. To answer your rhetorical question. I can blame them for lack of morality and covert psychopathy. I can blame them for not levelling up. I can blame them for lying and manipulating. I can blame them for subverting a country's rules and laws. I know that incentives drive behaviour but I'm not buying the "women are human excuse". Men could collectively organise to hunt, rape and beat up women. Are we doing it? No? Then merely pointing out that they grew up developing narciss…
/r/MensRights06/08/25 10:31 AM
7

That's why men are better off with a small State. On average, men work more and more financially savvy and live frugally. Taxes are a scam, they subordinate men to women and enable a gynocracy.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 03:11 PM
2

I thought they were bad at MGTOW?
/r/MensRights19/07/25 04:37 PM
1

https://youtu.be/QZH5TZWd77Y?si=aZ2mkH_xsdyaHGK8
/r/MensRights13/07/25 11:41 PM
1

Change country and stop paying. Find a non-extradition country and fuck them all
/r/MensRights13/07/25 07:55 PM
1

Pussy is antifragile. Women form cartels. Whenever this issue at hand is meant to maximise the alpha-fucks side of hypergamy women will ally themselves with the alphas. Whenever this issue at hand is meant to maximise the beta-bucks side of hypergamy women will ally themselves with the betas. That's why some men are against mandatory paternity tests, and some others are against abolishing alimonies. They both would lose something in the intragroup competition. Yes we need one strong cohort that'…
/r/MensRights13/07/25 07:48 PM
9

But wait the female brains cannot comprehend that humans = men + women, so if something affects humans then it MUST mean it affects BOTH. Ommygawd! Let's use another round of tu quoques logic to fight each other over who's got it worse
/r/MensRights18/06/25 05:07 PM
1

We can.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 05:45 PM
1

Right so why do the feminists claim it's rape if the boss hits on an employee? p0w3r DifFeRenTIaL! Shouldn't they be unshakable and unrealistically strong and resilient? Again, double standards
/r/MensRights20/05/25 06:45 AM
18

The same logic can be applied to women who get with narcissists who beat them up. Still convinced that victim blaming is the way to go? No one is immune to seduction, no one. Blaming it on an arbitrary "lack" of discipline is too expedient an argument for you never cap it. Nope, it's sociopaths on the other side doing this shit
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:34 AM
1

She's right that men don't fight more. There's a post by someone whose life is ruined because of a false allegation if you just scroll up and in the post she even threatened to call the police because he allegedly touched her while comforting the baby and that's supposedly abuse. I'm not an American but do you guys know that that call would have never been placed in most Eastern European, African, Latin American and Asian countries? Now, I'm not advocating for violence but at least prevent her f…
/r/MensRights18/05/25 11:35 AM
7

Your best bet is a virgin. My GF still had to be taught that not everything should be personalised and that old thoughts or moments of weakness may resurface at times without it meaning that something is wrong, but it's very very rare to find a woman like that. And even if you do, that doesn't mean it would be a consistent thing. You need a friend, not a partner in those cases
/r/MensRights27/04/25 10:49 AM
3

Nut...ley lol What I really learned from this story is that love doesn't matter, fidelity doesn't matter, promises don't matter. At any given point your spouse can literally throw you under the bus to escape punishment. It's not like I didn't know, but it stings each and every time.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 08:07 AM
2

No it's not, it's even offensive to talk about that
/r/MensRights30/03/25 02:02 PM
2

Women had it worse? Care to articulate? Which part of being killed by a sword or burnt alive or working in mines was actually better than staying at home?
/r/MensRights30/03/25 06:52 AM
1

Nice optimism bro but those "people" are men in hardworking environments, I assure you that the rest of the "people" values looks over competence unless there is something that requires immediate action to spare them of some negative consequences
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:57 AM
0

This question shouldn't even be asked for it is not about you, it's about the others. And, yes, height matters. In fact most of the life-altering decisions that involve us somehow are based on physical attributes one cannot change. That's how human beings are made. I'm just average, if you Google height stats I'm average on the dot, but that's tantamount to being short because average and short are non-tall people and that's enough not to be in Tier 1. But I also have good looks I didn't work fo…
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:55 AM
3

Can you explain under the same pseudo prosocial lenses the makeup industry, ANY female-leaning media, female-leaning psychology, social sciences, different standards of justice, male conscription, reproductive rights, paternity fraud, the empathy gap? I'm a very pareto-betterment leaning person but what you're describing here is a zero-sum game. It's very easy to understand that it's not morality or a prosocial attitude that's motivating you.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/25 12:35 PM
1

I mean the Latins used to say nomen omen, so your destiny is contained in your name. I mean her name is Cockrell
/r/MensRights26/02/25 12:05 PM
99

Unfortunately in my country you're not gonna fool anyone, you need a complacent psychologist who diagnoses gender dysphoria and it is named by the court. So it's hard to cheat
/r/MensRights26/02/25 12:03 PM
-18

But also female obligations like sucking dick lmao 🤣
/r/MensRights26/02/25 12:01 PM
11

Nope because most females suck. Let's not be like feminists that blame the patriarchy for everything, even AC units
/r/MensRights26/02/25 12:01 PM
1

I'm fairly sure that when most men hear AF:BB they mentally internalise it as Alpha Fucks OR Beta Bucks, when it should be interpreted as Alpha Fucks AND Beta Bucks. The 'and' part is always active, running like an operative system. Let's imagine that a fairy visits you at night and gives you a magic wand, she says she can turn you into Orlando Bloom if you want. Most men would agree and they would be alphas. After a bit everyone on the streets looks exactly like Orland Bloom and the Orlando Blo…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/25 07:05 AM
1

So why has my gf been simping for me since the beginning? She's 21 years my junior and has immediately connected and done things for me, so perhaps there is something more to explore? Evolutionarily I don't understand how that would make sense
/r/TheRedPill21/02/25 12:24 PM
1

Should be? Yes. Would be? No. Not gonna happen
/r/MensRights10/02/25 03:22 AM
21

Not always, there have been executions of innocent people. The jury can be manipulated
/r/MensRights31/01/25 11:23 AM
1

True but women in the aggregate influence spending decisions and that accounts to roughly 90% of the money spent in an economy, then you're also forgetting the quality of the job. Women on average don't do hard jobs, men do. And men spend on women the reverse is hardly ever true, OF shaming highlights this dynamic. On a side note you're not comparing oranges to oranges. The fact that women can do OF and the fact that the vast majority of them don't do it is not comparable. Every woman can, at an…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 10:01 PM
44

Watch out for the middle ground fallacy. Are women suffering? A bit, sure. Is it comparable to men's struggles? Not by any stretch of the imagination. Women can sell their farts on OF that's more than a queen ever could, no matter how educated they might be they've got preferential treatment in pretty much everything. I'm skeptical of calls for responsibility, they usually try and get the man screwed disproportionately should he take bait
/r/MensRights15/01/25 12:15 PM
1

And 'owned' is a misleading metric, there's more to it. Women spend between 80% and 90% of the money in an economy, so your money is spent by them and yet you're the bad person for creating an invisible cartel to bash women into submission
/r/MensRights13/01/25 11:33 AM
2

At this point I hope that people will open their eyes and realise that Western values like tolerance, freedom of speech , encouraging discourse over fighting is not conducive to victory. These nullities are so low and impossible to be reasoned with that the only way is to trump them and take things, like feminists do. Or time will pass, people will die and the next generation will be reset and the cycle won't break.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 11:12 AM
5

It is extremely rare that a woman ask for consent, although some very young ones (max 20) seldom do for some specific act
/r/MensRights11/01/25 06:08 PM
1

Dayem she caught such a big fish
/r/MensRights09/01/25 06:45 PM
2

Bro' was on fire when he wrote this
/r/MensRights09/01/25 06:44 PM
1

Let's be fair though, all women after a certain age are predatorial - if we are to accept their vernacular. They're mainly predatorial in terms of finances and to a lesser extent physically. There is not one woman I know who's in her 40's or late 30's who hasn't 'dated' a guy in his early 20's. They get a pass, that's the difference. Besides, between me and my gf she's the one sending sexual texts all day so once more rules only apply to men. Not that I mind but the thing is women only make rule…
/r/MensRights09/01/25 12:18 PM
2

Lol my gf is in school. The legal age is anywhere between 14 and 15 in most European countries but nobody is going below 18, it's a no-no
/r/MensRights09/01/25 07:41 AM
14

Man the US is doomed, my gf is 18 and I'm 39 lmao
/r/MensRights08/01/25 07:01 PM
1

We should push for paper abortion instead. I'll sire me hundred kids and be happy
/r/MensRights07/01/25 08:44 PM
3

Ok the red pill forum was dead long ago but now we even have to witness the nail into the coffin with this Petersonian dragon of chaos bullshit
/r/TheRedPill13/12/24 08:39 PM
1

Maybe in her case, but publicise it long enough and it will be like that for many. It's just the old order pushing back after finding out that the feminist experiment failed. Actually men should refrain from calling feminists out, just you wait and they'll contradict themselves at some point
/r/MensRights05/12/24 07:39 AM
24

Every week there's a new way to call prostitution
/r/MensRights05/12/24 05:28 AM
15

You can't relate, silly man. It's oppressive to be sponsored on yachts and travel the world.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 07:30 AM
15

By this logic slavery is black people's fault since most slavers were black. It's who benefits from something, not who does it. Men build civilization because women use coercion like sexual and emotional blackmail in order to bash men into producing. When the resources fall under a given threshold that's mostly affected by female entitlement in the form of standards of living, a country would attack another to pillage the resources to redistribute mostly to females. That's war.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 07:29 AM
5

He should be put to death
/r/MensRights18/11/24 09:01 AM
1

Wow what are you trying to accomplish by using the tu quoques fallacy?
/r/MensRights18/11/24 07:56 AM
2

Because men love women > women love children > and children love puppies
/r/MensRights17/11/24 09:21 PM
1

Presuming the point fallacy + binary thinking. Be a sophist and presume women are after your money at the slightest sign of interest and flip the script. Is it ethical? No. Is there a way to make women and men start talking to mutually grow rather than winning? Also no.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 07:09 PM
1

Where in the EU? In my country the age of consent is 14
/r/MensRights09/11/24 08:26 PM
2

Not an American but are there more women than men in the US? If so, it mathematically means that Trump won thanks to women, that would be hilarious. Obviously I'm making a rough estimation about people's age, I'm assuming they can vote lol
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:25 AM
8

Hitler loved animals, therefore animal rights should be based in Hitler's doctrine. Wait, why the hate? This sentence is logically as sound as "feminism is about equal human rights. It's NOT and it's never been
/r/MensRights22/10/24 05:11 PM
2

She kind of butchered her fiancé, then hid the evidence. I think she threw a camera into the laundry machine or something.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 09:03 AM
12

Different classes of people play the game with different weapons. Violence can be emotional, physical, psychological, financial and so on... It has been studied and proven that psychological scars are damaging to a person's health and body just like physical violence, it's a matter of intensity though. The truth is the people who abhor physical violence aren't magically non-violent. Who would want physical violence in the first place? We'll, these people tend to be violent on another level. I'm …
/r/MensRights28/09/24 04:09 PM
93

Infanticide, slender, murder is way less likely to result in death penalty, emotional violence, psychological violence
/r/MensRights28/09/24 11:23 AM
2

That doesn't matter one bit, it's not a race, it's a crime we're talking about.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 07:39 AM
3

That would be easy. Two straight pose as gay, they both get a baby free of the yoke of modern women and boom both are happy
/r/MensRights27/09/24 09:52 PM
7

Although it is dressed as something equal, it really is not. The paradox is that now an innocent and a culprit will be punished the same. Not enough. The real victory would be restoring the presumption of innocence for men
/r/MensRights17/09/24 04:50 PM
2

Yes, lol. But it doesn't happen. The reason why I have a fully remote job is that one day I'll teach and raise my kids, I want to play am active role
/r/MensRights08/09/24 02:19 PM
1

1) to a restaurant. 2) although that's entirely possible, I can still add the specification that "it may or may not the person in the pics using this profile, it's the profile I'm warning you against, not the person, do what you will" and it's fine
/r/MensRights26/08/24 04:59 PM
12

Give women power and they'll use it to control men's behaviour.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 02:58 PM
29

And if sometimes you say no she's gonna get it anyway saying "but I want to", been there.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 12:34 PM
164

A real woman provides for her family, then does her share of house chores AND is supportive of her husband's feelings AND not only does she have sex when he wants but she also has to be good at it or he is entitled to feeling neglected, cheat and take the kids and child support. /S
/r/MensRights26/08/24 10:58 AM
1

Child support without a tracked record of the expenses is alimony in disguise.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 06:15 AM
3

Women get away with anything. When I first watched the news about Jodi Arias I was like "she's not gonna get the DP, she's a woman", and it happened. Imagine playing the life game in god mode and then cry that the other team is supposedly cheating
/r/MensRights26/08/24 06:13 AM
1

Yes it is, it's cope. They say they're single by choice, but they're capping. Truth is nobody is willing to put a ring around their finger and put up with their BS
/r/MensRights26/08/24 06:01 AM
1

Yeah but they would like to have a husband but nobody is wifing their sorry asses up
/r/MensRights25/08/24 06:08 PM
2

What do you think all of those "single by choice" women are?
/r/MensRights25/08/24 05:24 PM
1

What pie?
/r/MensRights25/08/24 01:39 PM
2

I mean, I'm so paranoid that I immediately discard people who exhibit red flags. It's very very very improbable to find someone to have a family with who I'll not play by today's rules, which makes it almost a guarantee not to have a functioning family. Sure you can play around, but you'd be amazed by the number of women who don't want no kids and just embrace hedonism. They wanna have fun, travel, be irresponsible and all. A few days ago one of my "friends" was roasting a guy who wrote her some…
/r/MensRights25/08/24 12:25 PM
0

It's not deterring me from dating. I've got 3 non-exclusive partners I'm seeing and everything is shared and based on honesty. My not notch count is in the high-end 3 digits. Lately I had 3 ONS with 3 different people who are currently on holiday and still texting me to meet after they come back + one who just went out on a date and is texting me daily + a girl who's 21 years my junior who says she loves me and we're arranging to meet. It's not bad. What's bad is real-life griefers, that's what …
/r/MensRights25/08/24 12:14 PM
0

1 I'm not a quitter 2 it would be unfair since the griefer had the opportunity to grief but wasn't briefed 3 you solve nothing 4 if they never get punished, they'll never change 5 people have a right to know which scum to avoid
/r/MensRights25/08/24 10:04 AM
0

If she got slighted she wouldn't have let it go, she would have posted it on AWDTSG with a lot of falsehoods
/r/MensRights25/08/24 09:52 AM
3

Yes, and that's what society expects. People get a pass to take out their frustrations onto the next person, but they don't get a pass to take out their frustrations onto the person who did harm them. This perpetuates the cycle.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 06:39 AM
9

Typical of feminists. Addressing the tone rather than the content. First of all I'm the victim in this, so it has to be brought up. Had it happened to you you would have thought and done the same, maybe you would have strategically used a softer rhetoric but you would have thought and done the same. What's the red flag you're talking about exactly? Wanting to be treated as a human being? As a person? I even said that I'm not expecting nothing from a date, that being stood is okay, what's not ok …
/r/MensRights25/08/24 06:35 AM
10

I thought so, but it's better to check first. Perfect answer, btw 👍🏻 This is not a violation of the bond of trust between two spouses or lovers where one shares intimate pics, these are publicly available pics from a social media app. No nudity involved, just the usual standard of dating apps (photos in dresses). On top of that, that's my experience everything is as close to the truth as I can relate, and it might save other men. I think she's on a quest to hurt men or something
/r/MensRights25/08/24 12:38 AM
50

I'm tired of being a second class citizen. Women get away with too much. As long as we turn a blind eye the situation will not change. Had I done anything to deserve it I would have been on board. Had I been rude, had I sent dick pics, had I insulted her and such. But none of that happened. My only fault was being a man, this can't continue. She fucked up, people have to know.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 12:23 AM
65

It's not about taking it to the chin. I accept being stood. I accept being rejected. I accept that it doesn't click or whatever. I do not accept being played with experiments I did not consent to and then being made fun of. So my intent is to name and shame her now
/r/MensRights24/08/24 11:53 PM
3

Between stupidity and malice I'm skewed in favour od malice. F what Napoleon the dwarf said. I don't think women are incapable of understanding, I think they need to twist and shame any argument to force men into action. This piece of junk says a lot, anytime a man wants/needs protection FROM the state he's abusive and can't renege control, when in reality they want control over you by bating you into overcompensation.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 01:37 PM
3

Beta men HAVE TO vote like that, or they won't reproduce. It's not like they want to
/r/MensRights19/08/24 07:25 AM
3

Look for studies in which the criteria are bogus. I've converted several men who were indoctrinated simply by showing them the statistical incontinences in studies. People read the title of an article, then you challenge them to provide you with evidence supporting X, then they will link you a secondary if not tertiary source, then you attack the source, then they get pissed and quote a study then you dissect the study and find out the inevitable. Like those studies who equate violence with "he …
/r/MensRights18/08/24 11:35 AM
0

Source?
/r/MensRights18/08/24 06:36 AM
19

Lol the UK has done unto itself what Hitler wasn't capable of doing
/r/MensRights18/08/24 06:35 AM
1

Well if you wanna go down that road remember that if you want men to have abortion you need to remove women's ability to abort first. Women only understand power and blackmail, that's their MO. In fact you can see it clearly now that they have the option to abort they choose who to blackmail and who not to, and you're basically in their hands. But they will NEVER fight to extend a right they so dearly desire to men as well. So you need a big-ass reset. At that point you want abortion? Well, we c…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 07:12 AM
-2

If you insert paper abortion, yes. But as of now we don't have that possibility
/r/MensRights16/08/24 06:34 AM
-12

Abortion only benefits men if the woman aborting is not the top woman he can score. Otherwise, it doesn't
/r/MensRights16/08/24 06:28 AM
18

Exactly even murder, why not? I like the "It doesn't benefit you, therefore there's no point in coming clean" logic
/r/MensRights16/08/24 06:26 AM
43

This reminds me of a post where a woman was feeling guilty for cheating on her boyfriend at 16, fast forward the two are in their 90's and everyone is advising her not to come clean. You can't make this shit up, women are naturally antisocial, although there might be some exceptions, this is the norm.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 06:24 AM
2

Point 9) made me reconsider donating sperm in California, I'm European but I doubt that will "save" me
/r/MensRights14/08/24 06:45 PM
2

"I bet you're trying to neg me so as to have a shot at sucking it" She's giving me wizard sleeve kitten vibes
/r/MensRights10/08/24 07:46 AM
1

Nope but Italy is rough
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:46 PM
6

Trump doesn't get called out? Lmao I'm overseas and people call him out all day so I can only imagine what the scale is in America
/r/MensRights03/08/24 05:40 PM
16

It's about having certainty that you'll get your ass divorced, don't marry bro'
/r/MensRights03/08/24 04:29 PM
2

Minchia e vattene no? Hai 27 paesi in Europa in cui trasferirti. Io che me ne sono andato da quel paese di merda sto una crema
/r/MensRights03/08/24 04:28 PM
48

Because sex is a tool used to keep men enslaved. Whoever's got a lot of experience with women can report that, on average, men seek sex more than women do. Womens sexuality is cyclical so they leverage that to their own advantage. Because who needs something the least has the upper hand. Women on the other hand have more needs in terms of seeking attention, being comforted, being listened to, always feeling prone to hunger and craving sweets and shit. It might not be the case for one single indi…
/r/MensRights03/08/24 04:26 PM
4

I would challenge the assumption, I would do it for peace of mind reasons even if I trusted my partner 100%. The rest of the rationale is perfect though from a statistical point of view
/r/MensRights30/07/24 09:01 PM
13

The initial assumption is that since they were doubtful to begin with they had prior proof or a hunch or something... I would argue that the assumption is not necessarily true, personally I would do a paternity test even if I trust my partner 100%. Besides, to my brain "trust" isn't really a concept, I would do it to quell my anxiety like a video games player who checks his achievements after unlocking them, it's not that he's mistrustful of his skills (that's the straw-manning/shaming counter a…
/r/MensRights30/07/24 09:00 PM
18

She definitely lakhs morals lol
/r/MensRights25/07/24 10:03 AM
1

No he's just trash and an opportunist, but history is cyclical, soon enough these maggots will be called to fight in a war and we'll see what their mettle is like
/r/MensRights20/07/24 12:02 AM
6

I was horny and the 3 women around me didn't wanna suck my dick. Now I'm gonna roast them online. A real woman sucks off strangers /s
/r/MensRights17/07/24 08:23 PM
2

I'm all for that, too. But it's unrealistic to think it's gonna happen on a large scale. We don't have a pussy, it's as simple as that
/r/MensRights12/07/24 12:10 PM
2

Because they need to be your bros, and even then it can go terribly wrong. Most other men are facing an uphill battle just to enter into a relationship, just like you. So they have no time to play each other's therapist, unless they're good friends
/r/MensRights12/07/24 11:18 AM
2

Sorry to break it to you, but it's your fault for not being a dog. Had you been a puppy the would have loved you unconditionally /s Seriously, sorry for your loss I lost my mother too. And I also saw how relatives need YOU to be the catalyst and keep stoic while they can emote freely, it sucks, it really does.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 11:12 AM
-1

Because they would rather fuck someone more attractive then your current self. Switch to a less demanding job, play video games there, and then after 5 go to the gym. Every. Single. Day. If you go on a too long streak of not being in shape she will fuck somebody else. You're either breeding material for her or a commodity.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 10:48 AM
3

Because they would rather fuck someone more attractive then your current self. Switch to a less demanding job, play video games there, and then after 5 go to the gym. Every. Single. Day. If you go on a too long streak of not being in shape she will fuck somebody else. You're either breeding material for her or a commodity.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 10:39 AM
5

No it's not. It's a lie they say to perpetuate emotional violence. Problem 1: Who the fuck are they to impersonate police, prosecutors and judges? Problem 2: if they're really "concerned" why don't they go to the police?
/r/MensRights12/07/24 10:35 AM
-5

Here is what you can do: Lure her into doing BDSM. Start a Youporn channel with her, make her be enthusiastic about it. Then save all the screenshots, make her take pride in being "watched" by millions of people. Make her sign a contract that clearly states what the "safe word" is, and make her sign each clause of it. Whip her as hard as the laws in your country allow it. When she inevitably leaves you because the other harpies in the group will convince her that you're abusive well congrats for…
/r/MensRights12/07/24 10:29 AM
1

Develop the eye of the tiger and don't constrain yourself to things like honour, honesty, rationality and the like. Just play to WIN. On this sub people tolerate feminists, give them a say, don't silence them and the like. It's as if Ukrainian soldiers went full samurai mode and fought with swords against bombs. It simply doesn't work. Most women are incapable of reaching win-win outcomes or building a functioning society, some can, but it's better to treat all guns as if they were loaded.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 06:06 PM
3

The problem is easily solvable, just make.parlours for women. At this point, although there are (few) exceptions most women want to emote and release their dialectical diarrhea. Just don't take them seriously.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 05:49 PM
9

I was cheated out of orgasms pretty much for my entire life. I've got an extremely high notch count compared to my peers yet each and every time it's the same. I think the foreskin does a lot
/r/MensRights30/06/24 10:41 AM
3

This post should be on the bluepill sub lol. 1) you're using the ethos over pathos over logos BS. "reeks of revenge" only women and emotional people treat what if feels like before what it is like, even if revenge fuelled his progress it still worked. 2) "women aren't mean for no reason" yes they are, and the reason is that they can get away with everything: lying, leading people on, messing with people's lives, sociopathy, cunning behaviour by excusing them on the grounds of what they can poten…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/24 06:02 AM
3

Never ever ever take a woman on a dinner date if you haven't fucked her already. That being said, they can't force you to pay for both but they will try to pressure you into it.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 05:30 PM
2

The first link is an article, not a study, reporting another article with 1 personal anecdote. 1. The second link is a study about stomach pain, therefore it cannot be extended to other areas and certainly is not enough to conclude that women are gaslighted in the medical sphere. At best it is indicative of longer waiting times in one specific area. The third link is rubbish, no quantitative study only a qualitative study which is per se subject to bias.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 09:30 PM
2

I passed the statistics exam, and I've got an MBA that's why I was pointing out the flaws of one study consisting of 1 person, and another one who's taking a 16-min wait and inferring that there's sexism everywhere in the medical field according to the title, that women are gaslighted and aren't taken seriously. It directly contradicts your comment
/r/MensRights19/06/24 05:55 PM
2

Lol an article quoting a non-neutral source like the New York Times in which there is the statistically significant number on 1!!! Case lmao 🤣😂 And then the other piece of "evidence" is that women wait 16 minutes longer according not to a study but another article in the guise of a study? GTFOH. Link studies, not articles and we can talk The study about abdominal pain concludes: "Gender bias is a POSSIBLE explanation for oligoanalgesia in women who present to the ED with acute abdominal pain." S…
/r/MensRights19/06/24 02:35 PM
3

How can a single man do that though? I would be interested
/r/MensRights19/06/24 06:19 AM
13

List of bullshit: "women are more considerate than men". Citation needed, no studies support that. "women are less than half as likely to have their symptoms taken seriously". Citation needed, no studies support that. "doctors don't listen to women, misdiagnose women, give women less pain meds, and have been found time again to take women less seriously in general". Citation needed, no studies support that. "it has been systematically proven that the industry is by men, and serves men". Imaginar…
/r/MensRights18/06/24 09:24 AM
2

"The reason women have stronger communities/support networks than men is simping". There, corrected for you OP
/r/MensRights17/06/24 05:31 PM
0

These foes don't even look that good
/r/MensRights16/06/24 06:06 PM
3

That's awesome news my boyo! Who would refuse on-call blowjobs and booty daily? Let her! My feminist friends are always available after 10-11 PM and they never fail to show their appreciation
/r/MensRights15/06/24 09:51 AM
1

Nice emotional argument and lack of logic. Are you sure you have what it takes to be in a sub Reddit like this?
/r/MensRights06/06/24 03:31 PM
1

This is a very predictable response. What's worth noting in my opinion is that women's game pivots around the "it's not the same" trope like you're doing in this case. That allows them to push their interest to the detriment of men's. Feminists never go for the win-win, it's always a zero sum game. Now, the core issue is not who does what, it's lack of genuine desire. Feminism taught women that the nature of interpersonal relationships is transactional that's why they always magnify what they do…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 01:44 PM
0

Nice promotion of hypoagency there
/r/MensRights06/06/24 07:05 AM
1

Who gets to decide what's the right level of cleanness? For if 2 spouses have different ideals the ones with the highest standard (usually the woman) will "win" and impose unrequested work onto the other. At this point you will reiterate that it's adult life, basic skills etc etc. Ok fair enough. Now do that with regards to sexual frequency and we've got a problem. If relationships are based on mutual understanding and respect then the 2 people should state at the beginning what they are willing…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:56 AM
1

No insisting apparently voids consent lol
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:50 AM
0

I'm not, I'm saying that there are political killings and they can be disguised as suicides. It happened to Covid vaccine opposers too
/r/MensRights05/06/24 12:54 PM
-11

Did he commit suicide or was he suicided though? It seems so off, why would he do that?
/r/MensRights05/06/24 10:47 AM
1

Red Pill
/r/MensRights03/06/24 05:43 PM
0

Blow that tranny, it's gonna be just fine
/r/MensRights03/06/24 06:45 AM
2

I wanna spit some RP theory and only comment indirectly: You guys remember the concept of the 'hierarchy of love'? Men love women, women love children and children love puppies. Well guess what, the hierarchy of hate follows the same structure, you have no idea how many babies are killed by mothers every year, born babies.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 06:32 AM
1

The gender doesn't matter /s
/r/MensRights03/06/24 05:59 AM
3

Yeah sure because they can figure it out themselves right? You need to teach them not to be assholes, otherwise they wouldn't know . Dafuk?
/r/MensRights03/06/24 05:52 AM
5

Thanks for the TL;DR version
/r/MensRights03/06/24 05:48 AM
16

You forgot "carefully vet her mother/family too" they will be another burden if they see you as the provider type
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:11 PM
2

They always change the laws to accommodate hypergamy. Men cannot choose based on the laws, we need to anticipate times because the sole purpose of courts being there is to stop one tad before people go postal, it's a controlling of the herd kinda thing. These judges are insane psychopaths, nobody should have that amount of power
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:08 PM
17

My ex gf showed me screenshots of various 304's who said that sex with me was disappointing, there's just one problem though I never had sex with the ones who posted my picture and sexual history online. Now I'm in various relationships and they know it and one of them is a lawyer, she said that in the country we live in there's no recourse. I could win and have the pics removed but they won't be punished, no monetary compensation and no jail time for them AND they can still re-upload them and I…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 07:57 PM
8

But your honour if I stopped chopping dicks off I'd be homeless You're right my boy-o you can continue just soften the butchering part aight?
/r/MensRights25/05/24 08:58 AM
2

Well I'm not trying to normalise it but here in Europe, especially in the South and in the East, people won't even notice it. You see a boyfriend and girlfriend arguing in the street sometimes and she slaps him but people look away
/r/MensRights25/05/24 06:03 AM
9

Seriously, I've been slapped/punched for having coworkers text me on fucking MS teams
/r/MensRights24/05/24 10:46 AM
9

Because they simply simpolice as assume the man is the culprit. Seriously how common is it to be beaten by a woman for petty reasons? In my experience it's pretty common
/r/MensRights24/05/24 10:45 AM
1

By other women I presume? And, yes, I'm using feminists' logic here lol
/r/MensRights24/05/24 05:49 AM
1

Not all women but 99% of men are victims of fake gossips
/r/MensRights23/05/24 11:08 AM
11

I hope it does. It's a quick death Vs a slow one
/r/MensRights23/05/24 10:54 AM
2

"just 32%" is fucking crap, that's one in three. Vs 39% who wouldn't, there's just a tiny difference
/r/MensRights23/05/24 10:24 AM
24

She's larping, if she finds another man she'll change again
/r/MensRights22/05/24 07:43 PM
0

Yes but don't rejoice, she's low-key assuming that the wrong men could be more dangerous than a bear, which is factually incorrect, at best they're equally dangerous
/r/MensRights22/05/24 10:29 AM
1

Yes because they're qualitatively different according to the law, but it shouldn't be so. RP is quickly actionable, defamation isn't. But the intent underlying both is character assassination and disqualification of the victim to potential partners in the future. As for RP we quickly imagine that showing one person's sexuality would be inherently damaging to the psyche of said person AND can lead to a loss but there's no need to prove anything. In a defamation case you have to prove the defamati…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 04:38 AM
0

Sounds more like an emotional argument, a definition applied to another context? Nice manipulation. You're a bigot as in you're trying to use the middle ground fallacy in order to discredit both parties unequally, kind of a tu quoques. Feminists are shite but so are MRA's here's a long trolling post full of fake equivalencies lmao
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:26 PM
3

No AWDTSG is not any less violent than revenge porn. I have physical pain, anxiety, loss of romantic opportunities and can't sleep at night. Women choose men in terms of reliability, if they invest time they don't want to lose the investment that he might leave for a younger one. Men choose women in terms of sexual prudence, they don't want to invest time and have someone else's baby, they should be punished the same. On top of that women have the legal and tactical advantage that their interest…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 09:37 AM
2

Revenge porn is sexual reputation damage - Female equivalent: gossiping and "are we dating the same guy" lies. PUAs use manipulative tactics - female equivalent: any female dating site and the cosmetic industry. Secret photos of men exist, too Slut-shaming is almost exclusively done by women to discredit other women, men are too afraid to do it. Then again, men's sexuality is shamed AWDTSG is just that. Male sexuality is everywhere too, but women's standards are immutable, men's are not so even …
/r/MensRights21/05/24 09:15 AM
1

Hey we finally got a bigot! Welcome OP. MRA is not that kind of mental indoctrination that makes people in a society prioritise their ideology over their institutional rule (psychologists, lawyers, judges, teachers etc) nice try though
/r/MensRights21/05/24 06:05 AM
2

I was old enough to be there in the '90s and 2000's and when exactly were women treated like that? When did we have revenge porn groups that are comparable to are we dating the same guy? Where was the toxic masculinity against women? C'mon
/r/MensRights21/05/24 06:01 AM
1

Violent fantasies arise from the awareness that you're in a double bind. The State COULD do something about it, but they don't care. To use a video game analogy there are real-life griefers who grief you just because they can, there's no real reason why bullies bully you, sometimes they grief you within the contours of the law, many times they do outside the contours of the law but you can't prove it or it's gonna be unlikely to win or they won't be really punished when caught, and so you fantas…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 06:32 AM
0

Lol this is super accurate, if I were to use the American taxonomy to identify myself 'Hispanic' would be the closest to me, we have different standards. Also Latino in America doesn't mean someone who's culturally from one of the countries where romance languages are spoken, and that's also historically incorrect.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 06:18 AM
1

You wouldn't be talking about the first amendment if it was revenge porn. The two, are of the same kind. Women assassinate men's characters based on reliability, men assassinate women's character based on sexuality. The aim is to elevate them to the rank of a criminal offense. And it should be. In my case sexual details were shared in the form of text rather than images multiple times. No protection from the authorities. Also in many jurisdictions outside of the US secret groups are forbidden by…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 06:08 AM
2

I once got roasted for suggesting that high ranking men have a natural predisposition to fuck lower men over. This is not to say that alphas fuck betas for personal gain, it's the opposite. If tradcons win you're a cog in the capitalistic machine, the beta-bucks side of hypergamy is the only halal way of starting a family and they will bash you into serving the elite. BUT you'll have your own family, if you play by their rules. If feminists win you're a culprit by default, the alpha-fucks side o…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:53 PM
1

That's not enough, it's the behaviour that needs eradication, not the Facebook group that needs deletion. We need to fight to equate this to revenge porn, perpetrators should face jail time
/r/MensRights19/05/24 07:55 PM
1

I tell all my women that we're not exclusive apart from the usual emotional abuse, physical assault like slaps and general shaming language I still got lied about and had my sexual history on these groups. Nice try, bigot
/r/MensRights19/05/24 07:00 PM
4

AND they also need to touch the baby without his consent at birth, ask me how I know
/r/MensRights19/05/24 10:27 AM
1

The only way to destroy these groups is not by being passively disobedient, it is to fight fire with hell fire. I have porn videos of all my exes if one posts me online, and it happened, I'll just share them. Do I care that that's illegal? No. Also libel is, character assassination should be punished in the same way as revenge porn. Men care about women's purity. Women care about men's reliability. We could go for the win-win and go for a truce, but they don't want to level up. The State is no u…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 12:08 PM
1

No it wouldn't it would simply leave the floor to mass impregnators. I'm not trying to discourage you but it is simply naive to think that MGTOW is gonna teach them, it won't.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 11:36 AM
3

You're so wrong, they're GIFs lmao
/r/MensRights17/05/24 11:21 AM
2

Because people frequenting hookers are generally looking for intimate connection and appreciation rather than sex. I know that the maxim that men are romantics pretending to be realists and women are realists pretending to be romantic can be offensive, but most men are actually very kind and willing to find genuine connection but cannot reach that stage easily since they're constantly filtered out. If you're 5'5 there's not much you can do to find a romantic partner, so either you get bitter or …
/r/MensRights16/05/24 08:35 AM
0

If they stopped though they would lose an edge. Only beta men do it. And that's because they instinctively know that they've already lost the genetic war so they need some form of intrasexual warfare. Unfortunately men cannot form a cartel because of hypergamy
/r/MensRights16/05/24 05:29 AM
2

My girlfriend told me that her client told her I'm bad in bed. She has a job where she interacts with a lot of women and I fucked a lot of them. So before I made her confess who she was so protective of who the other person would be, wouldn't show me her picture cause "it's a private thing" to which I replied "her fave pic is private but my sexual history isn't?" And then she showed me her pic. It was the first time I saw her face, maybe it was a test, maybe not. The point is, women will try and…
/r/MensRights16/05/24 05:26 AM
2

By thinking that way you end up validating women's points though. You seem to be commodifying pussy and that is something that's not up to you to do. Women want to have self autonomy and the results are for everyone to see. Remember women can't talk openly or their entire game falls flat, when they say they've been "oppressed" what they actually mean is "I hate with every fiber of my body the fact that societally I was pushed to reproduce with that one guy who's 5'8 and has a thinning vertex and…
/r/MensRights16/05/24 05:18 AM
1

I don't know why all the hate happened. I would like to see men stick together as well, what I'm talking about is the theory of games. That's also why communism doesn't work. If you expect men to cooperate by sticking to an ideology (i.e. bros over hoes) there will ALWAYS be an incentive from less successful men to try and snatch a woman from another. Whereas women can share. If 10 women share Brad Pitt they're all happy, if 10 Brad Pitt share a Jennifer Aniston unless she has 10 kids some of th…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 07:12 AM
4

It will bear branch though
/r/MensRights09/05/24 06:25 AM
0

If you can get pussy reasonably fast you can go without LTR's, common law marriage, cohabitation and the like. Luckily in my country cohabitation doesn't legally mean anything. If you can't get pussy easily enough, then solitude is gonna take a heavy toll on your psyche. Besides, betas would simply wait and let other people go MGTOW first and then screw them breaking the 'agreement' by overpaying just to get a single mother of 3. You just can't merge men's strategies together, no cartel is possi…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:41 AM
1

Translation: I got caught, so like all narcissists do I'll portray myself as the victim. I also don't have the mental resilience to withstand criticism, therefore I'm unfit for the job.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 11:35 AM
-5

Betas can't afford it, it's a losing proposition. It won't work
/r/MensRights05/05/24 11:17 AM
-29

The sooner you realise that men's main problem is other men the better. Double standards in justice are just simping of the highest order
/r/MensRights05/05/24 11:15 AM
1

I literally mean that some countries suck for the locals, the Western ones, if you move abroad your odds will dramatically increase especially if you relocate to a more traditional country. Just don't bring them back in if you want a LTR
/r/MensRights04/05/24 05:52 AM
1

Facts. The best way to destroy feminism is to ignore it
/r/MensRights03/05/24 06:27 PM
1

Dating apps are great, I got 600+ notch count from them. If they don't work change country and retry
/r/MensRights03/05/24 05:49 PM
4

Bears are less likely to use the state to inflict violence by proxy. I'll pick the bear
/r/MensRights03/05/24 08:30 AM
3

Wish the lethality rate of men would match the bears'. If we are worse then most certainly women would benefit from such a move.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 02:44 PM
1

The biggest downside is lack of pleasure in my case
/r/MensRights01/05/24 01:33 PM
1

Bring some facts instead of emotions and we'll have a good discussion. Your way of thinking is subversive, and most generally women's way of thinking is subversive, because in order to save the exception you condemn the mass to misery. On top of that placing all the importance on safety is antisocial for the consequences of YOU feeling safer and not wanting something will be paid by many with a lot of emotional violence that we see every day. It's women who destroyed things like the presumption …
/r/MensRights28/04/24 10:21 PM
1

And that "sometimes" justifies the rest? Besides, you can easily enforce that with an exception to the law (rape) where the police can intervene
/r/MensRights27/04/24 09:47 AM
1

Non-blood-related people will always have an agenda to impose over your family's wellbeing. Do some relatives commit atrocious acts? Yes, but most don't. Courts are not there to preserve your family, they're there to destroy it.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 11:07 AM
7

I got cupped! A girl threw a cup at me and missed after I told her "no" when she asked whether she could stay for the night. The same night when she confessed to being a prostitute, it was our 3rd date I had bedded her twice for free lmao and didn't even know what she did, so when she told me I refused and as a response she threw a cup at me. The landlord wanted ME to pay for the damage to the floor (the cup missed me and hit the floor). I told her I wasn't the one throwing the cup, I was the on…
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:19 AM
1

We should fight to remove the courts in family court altogether. No non-blood related people should have ANY say in a child's growth. Ever.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 10:13 AM
2

Brang brang he shot me down
/r/MensRights24/04/24 11:29 AM
4

Not all Nazis killed jews
/r/MensRights24/04/24 08:18 AM
4

Yes, it took me 16 years to get where I am lol. Tell him to get a Master's Degree, MBA, be fluent 3-4 languages (I use 4 non-native ones at work) and THEN can you apply for a job like that
/r/MensRights24/04/24 04:46 AM
10

I manage a small team, all women I date are jealous because I make the double compared to them, WFH and play Xbox all day. If you give in you'll probably have the same amount of money somewhere else, less energy, less happiness, more drama, more stress, less "marshmallow" time together etc. just don't listen to her
/r/MensRights24/04/24 03:17 AM
-1

How is your own experience applicable to others'?
/r/MensRights24/04/24 03:12 AM
11

This is not about him wanting something in return. He never said it, and you're straw-manning. This is about using people, which is psychopathic, which is immoral. Shaming men for not committing DOES occur, I've been shamed for not wanting to commit many times. Women don't owe men sex, men don't owe women commitment. We reached the lose-lose point and society is decadent. That's ok. OP's one is an appeal to honesty, IF men were upfront about wanting sex without committing and IF women were upfro…
/r/MensRights23/04/24 07:59 PM
1

No one, I repeat no one refrains from playing the game. Everybody plays the reproduction game according to their own strengths. If a man is not succeeding other men will always find it convenient to laugh at him in order to gain a small boost in perceived attractiveness, other women will laugh at him because they're a cartel and they collude and removing one undesired competitor from the game is beneficial. Once you understand that hypergamy is Keynes economics applied to reproduction it all mak…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 07:04 AM
8

You didn't even read your own sources lmao "Hippocrates wrote about puerperal fever, agitation, delirium, and mania experienced by women after childbirth". This being said, the psychological condition is not an excuse for murder. In some countries, including mine, it is specifically written in the penal code that the psychological condition does not matter when committing a crime unless you're incapable of discerning. This is clearly an attempt to excuse multiple murder on the basis of nothing.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 09:22 PM
9

Lol well established by female shrinks as much as gender dysphoria and other bullshit?
/r/MensRights13/04/24 09:05 PM
54

And he was even fired for telling his story
/r/MensRights13/04/24 08:32 PM
11

Postpartum is a delusion contrived by the female psychology establishment to hide the mass murder of thousands of babies per year. Change my mind. And in any case the psychological state of a person cannot be used as an excuse, by that logic psychotic murderers should be excused.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 08:28 PM
1

No, men can't choose for example not to pay child support, they can't choose whether they'll be responsible for a specific child, they can't adopt him away etc. Even sperm donors can be trapped into child support but the other lesbian parent (for the sake of argument I'm picking them lesbians) can choose not to be responsible for the kid once the relationship is over, but a step dad cannot disentangle himself from it if the court rules that he behaved "like the father" etc.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 06:45 PM
2

That's why you gift them the National Małe and they will learn
/r/MensRights12/04/24 08:01 PM
4

I'm 38 yo dating an 18 yo. She's crazy in love and I am always thinking that someday someone will sabotage us big time. And this impacts my daily life negatively because I'm not as stoic as I wish I was, and besides there's a cap. It's not dread but it's a constant feeling like paranoia, the feeling you're not doing anything bad yet you'll be punished for it. Don't settle for women with kids, don't betray yourself. I've been in love with single mothers, genuine love, but if you "step up" then th…
/r/MensRights12/04/24 05:15 AM
0

Derailing the conversation aren't we? First thing first, Reddit, The Internet, WiFi and all we're created by men in business setting. False equivalence. It is irrelevant if "some" women would agree or "not everyone is like that" and bullshit like that. We're in a democracy, you said it yourself that most women will not agree due to hypocrisy, which is correct. Therefore, dialogue is not an option if you want to win since you simply won't have the numbers to reach what you want. Results= they'll …
/r/MensRights10/04/24 04:15 PM
2

Women can just get pregnant and exclude the father forever. Or they can abort. Or they can adopt the kid away. Or they can leave him in McDonald's bathroom
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:29 PM
0

One I was arguing with a feminist who claimed she was in favour of abortion for everyone..then to a specific question she trolled that she wasn't against men having access to abortion, if only men could abort. Now you're doing the same, you're moving the goalpost using the bodily autonomy. Abortion grants women the privilege or the right not to raise a child of their choosing. Plain and simple. And yes it involves their body, as a side, but most abortions are elective. The data is clear, there's…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:25 PM
0

No it's not, it's just how life is. You can challenge my assumption scientifically if you want, just run many experiments in which you start off telling women that you wholeheartedly endorse abortion and then say that you're egalitarian and that every gender should have equal access to it. But since men can't physically abort they should be given a legal equivalent. And then track the responses. I guarantee that almost no woman will be in favour of it and will try to move the goalpost. On top of…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:39 PM
0

You clearly don't know the theory of games, and your approach "one step at a time" clearly shows what your mentality is. You need to move 2 STEPS at a time, simultaneously, or you won't reach the goal. The right should be for both, so one law that addresses men's and women's rights. Otherwise the one who moves first will prevent the other from gaining said right
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:24 PM
-2

I didn't say we should laugh at them for the removal of a right, but your take is pretty disingenuous. There is no golden rule "you help me, I help you" bullshit. In fact, women have a natural incentive not to keep their end of the bargain once they get what they want. Think of it as Briffault's law applied to society, also men's and women's strategies are adversarial. Therefore, the lack of a right is the best position to start rebuilding from BUT you gotta do it the right way. Women will never…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 01:29 PM
11

Seriously you don't have the mental endurance to keep in mind what you posted 5 mins prior to this
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:01 AM
1

You sir met a narcissist
/r/MensRights10/04/24 10:57 AM
1

BUT in order for both sexes to have that right, which I agree with, it is a necessary step for both sexes NOT to have that right for the moment one sex has that right and the other doesn't that very sex will fight to keep their privilege at the expense of the other's by preventing them from accessing said right. SO now it is necessary to reintroduce that right AND do it in a way that grants said right SIMULTANEOUSLY to both. Like you make abortion laws which include physical abortion for women a…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 10:27 AM
1

Pretend you're upset, don't be dumb OP
/r/MensRights10/04/24 10:24 AM
1

Tbf my first time I was below the age of consent and she was legally an adult, but we were both kids anyway. She had a very bad romantic life we broke up, she got married, he cheated, she then cheated on him with me and now has no kids. But there's nothing to brag about, if you're a kid and have sex with an adult in all likelihood it will suck
/r/MensRights10/04/24 10:22 AM
3

That's not a grey area because now in the EU it works pretty much in the same way for every country with minor numerical differences for the age of consent. There is NO GAP to take into account if the person has reached the age of consent, it USED TO be different and people still think it's morally reprehensible BUT legally there's no difference between an 18 yo having sex with a 15 yo and an 85 yo having sex with a 15 yo.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 10:08 AM
1

I think that too, but I also have a feeling that we reached the point of diminishing returns because everyone I verbally sparred with at this point does one of these 2 things: 1) retracts comfortable in a convenient position that makes him look good like "violence is bad" or "we should get along" knowing damn well that a stall only favours who's winning or 2) has an incentive to lie and reframe other forms of violence as "not violence" using what I call the "it's not the same fallacy". So since …
/r/MensRights10/04/24 09:27 AM
1

The moment your opponent has the certainty that you can't do it, they stop being a human being though. They'll go full feral mode and do unto you all sorts of things because they'll get away with it. That's what happens if you limit one weapon but not the others. All it takes is a false allegation and you'll be beaten up and raped in jail and the one committing it will go scott free despite you having suffered all of that. That's why every country has police and an army, there's a difference bet…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 09:16 AM
2

It's not a matter of energy or woo-woo bullshit. It's a matter of fragility. Tryhards make mistakes by trying hard, and most things in life depend on not making mistakes. Doing 1 bad move completely nullifies 100 good moves, that's why. But there is no fate bullshit. I've always seen that with women low effort is a pretty strong indicator of high outcomes and high effort is a pretty strong indicator of low outcomes.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/24 06:12 AM
1

Name me one right that men got out of talking with moderate feminists, maybe I genuinely missed it
/r/MensRights09/04/24 09:07 PM
1

The problem with Western cultures is that they allocate too much importance on banning physical violence but they don't do the same in banning other forms of violence and by doing so they enable whatever shit somebody creates in your life in the name of freedom. It's just not worth to discuss at that point because the average person will advocate for the status quo despite disagreeing with it because it is too costly to embrace the radical way. So whoever has the best concealed weapons, fmeinist…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 09:06 PM
1

You're talking as if feminists can be reasoned with, history proves that's not the case. Besides, emotional abuse is violence. False accusations are violence. Violence by proxy is violence. Circumcision of an infant is violence. Sex with students when you're a teacher is violence. Abortion is violence. Since you follow the "if/then" logic when it comes to limiting DV, which I agree with, you should also consider that IF women don't use their form of violence THEN men won't use theirs. It's usual…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 02:37 PM
1

Yes exactly, so you're part of their ranks since it won't produce any appreciable change within our lifespans. So the price of your sanctimony is today's losers' sufferings. Life works like an RPG, different classes of people will have different weapons, different skills, different weaknesses and different strengths. It's not by ouwlawing men's that you'll win anyhow. Now, would I be in favour of banning DV? Absolutely. But ONLY if you simul-fucking-taneously ban also women's weapons. So no hist…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 12:00 PM
5

Not necessarily true, mid-level violence WILL be used to justify female tyranny, that's undeniable. BUT high level violence will not and the reason is that if they are still standing after an attack they will condemn it because they're still pulling the strings BUT if they are toppled by the attack that logic you mentioned will die off. Name me one country who was founded without war, insurgency, irredentism, civil war etc That's the logic of revolutions. People will simply fuck up too much when…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 10:41 AM
2

That's only good outside of the US, it's not applicable in cucked countries
/r/MensRights09/04/24 10:34 AM
2

Wanted level 5 stars lol 😆
/r/MensRights22/03/24 02:19 PM
1

I disagree, I use it a lot with regards to my friends' ex-wives. The funny thing is that they don't look into the mirror and disgust themselves like a man would. One of them had 3 lovers, fell in love with one, resisted her husband's speech that he was just trying to get sex from her out of hubris, then took the kid from the home she grew up in - which was fully paid for, by him - and put the baby in an occupied apartment and They're going to trial for it. Yep, they're squatters. There's no heat…
/r/MensRights22/03/24 08:16 AM
14

If you ask me that's high treason. Anyway the important part is to allow men to do the same, not shaming women who do - regardless of how inhumane their behaviour is
/r/MensRights10/03/24 01:55 PM
28

So? Women's bodies are more adapt to bear children. Does it mean the State has the power to force their impregnation? No. So YOU stop the cap, these men don't have a choice, this needs to stop.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 01:54 PM
1

Psychologists would prove you wrong within the blink of an eye. Saying things like "you're a nullity", racial slurs, berating statements and the like are not speech. Therefore, your whole rhetoric falls flat. I'm sorry you're ignorant to the fact that there's a plethora of verbal statements that are considered to be violence in other countries, and are punished. My friend got punished for telling his wife she's fat in retaliation for her calling him old with a small dick and the psychologist tur…
/r/MensRights26/02/24 07:01 PM
1

False. In some countries, like mine, it's illegal. On top of that you're straw-manning by framing it as "getting their feelings hurt" when in reality there's a plethora of tactics deemed abusive by the psychology itself like snooping through one's phone, gossiping, rage-bating and the like. The fact that it's hard to prove is a mere procedural problem but it's illegal nonetheless.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 06:44 PM
1

So would you be ok with legally punishing women who escalate due to low emotional control? Society bashes men into not reacting in a physically violent way. To make things even the same should be applied to women with regards to not reacting in an emotionally violent way.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 04:41 PM
1

If you've got an imaginary hypergamous gun pointed at your temple all the time you'd better earn more or be condemned to singlehood (which is actually good). You have no idea about how many stupid-ass professions women choose due to their innate laziness. I meet women in their 40's and 50's who draw for a living or sell plants and shiet. And then they are broke all the time and want you to take care of them. C'mon.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:26 PM
-1

Yes, that's all there is to it.
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:20 PM
4

On top of that you can't even talk about it or abuse will follow. The BEST option is to find a friend, but most people are too isolated to even find a non judgmental one. As a second best you can write a diary
/r/MensRights20/02/24 02:19 PM
6

Women and children assume that men will run amok as soon as they show the tiniest bit of anger or frustration. That's because it's better to err on the side of extreme prudence, especially if you evolved in a lawless world like it was in the past. But now it's utter BS, it's blown out of proportion. That's also abusive, women never apologise in general, let alone for overestimating someone's anger, so it's convenient for them to bitch about everything because they don't get punished or shamed in…
/r/MensRights20/02/24 01:52 PM
3

He's not "weak" for showing emotions, but I want to give you a chance and paraphrase what you said. Anger is a declaration of impotence, not weakness. It basically means you don't have a good strategy to fend off whatever that is you're facing. That's why men need to have many experiences with women so that "they've been there before", know that most of it is BS, and keep leading in a calm relaxed way. But no one has the time to amass all the experiences that might occur so the go-to response is…
/r/MensRights20/02/24 01:48 PM
4

Male anger bias
/r/MensRights20/02/24 01:28 PM
2

Normal, yes. Right, no. Don't let her.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 06:58 PM
8

Don't worry, I've been there. Patiently working and saving up while living off a few euros/day. You'll make it. In my case it was 2 old women trying to scam me on the rental deposit, fast forward some years I've got 2 apartments on my name in the city centre and 2 years worth of salaries in the bank. Maybe it won't be crazy fast for you as well but you'll get out of there. Just don't lose hope.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 04:33 PM
5

But being a conservative while the other part is liberal doesn't work, it's like being a pacifist during a civil war and your neighbour is trying to kill you. Maybe the opposite would work a bit, but the elites want to depopulate so they'll teach women to be hoes and men to be betas
/r/MensRights27/01/24 09:46 AM
12

Which fucking world do you live in? I'm almost 40 and all women my age are disgustingly obese, I've got almost a 6 pack abs
/r/MensRights22/01/24 01:36 PM
4

They have a code of honor at least, women don't
/r/MensRights12/01/24 05:10 PM
1

They'll never understand it
/r/MensRights12/01/24 05:08 PM
0

Ghosting is emotional abuse and you're doing them wrong
/r/MensRights12/01/24 02:10 PM
5

It happened to a guy in Italy
/r/MensRights12/01/24 02:09 PM
1

That she's manipulative
/r/MensRights12/01/24 02:07 PM
6

How is the State any different from Mafia? That's a shakedown
/r/MensRights12/01/24 12:24 PM
1

There are no major differences in the war of the sexes we're witnessing now and major things from the past like nazism and communism. The only difference is a more refined way of conducting these wars. Nowadays physical violence is overly frowned upon, I believe it is a remnant of WW2 and the cold war, but psychological violence is encouraged. We've got anti-biology laws (like you can't raise your voice ever or someone in a given point in the future can hurt you really bad, like removing your ki…
/r/MensRights09/01/24 06:17 AM
3

More brainwashing. When will it end? At least the Nazis were honest about who they hated and what they were doing
/r/MensRights08/01/24 09:34 PM
6

Perhaps you suffer from anhedonia? I do too, and yes being always forced to feign happiness without being able to emote is a tough one
/r/MensRights07/01/24 08:58 AM
7

That's because you've seen a lot of men with cows in tow, don't fret over it my brother
/r/MensRights07/01/24 08:56 AM
2

Yeah it should be flat
/r/MensRights07/01/24 08:50 AM
1

So she was 41 when she got pregnant?
/r/MensRights07/01/24 08:44 AM
2

You can't trust the courts. Once you have the concept of 'child support' in the open you also can't control how people will use it. Therefore, it's best to strip the courts of the ability to decide on child support. If you eliminate the concept of child support, doesn't mean that you also eliminate fathers' instincts to protect and provide. The child will be taken care of anyway but the financial decisions will be made by a person who's related to him by blood rather than a stranger who's got an…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 08:41 AM
6

Mothers are theoretically more important until the age of 7-9, then they lose interest in the child and it's the father's turn
/r/TheRedPill01/01/24 07:45 AM
1

Cuckolding is r-word
/r/MensRights31/12/23 05:32 PM
16

They need to keep the brainwashing alive
/r/MensRights31/12/23 01:54 PM
20

+203
/r/MensRights31/12/23 11:41 AM
3

I personally read 'How to Destroy a Man Now" and I'll read this too. The more I dig the more I convince myself that a society cannot be built if we allow both men and women to shape it. I'm not against women voting or anything but they had their sexual revolution, we need our responsibility revolution. And opt out of society passively by demolishing things like child support, alimony, jail time for failure to do anything 'responsible' and the like and create safe zones that the government can't …
/r/MensRights31/12/23 11:41 AM
4

I have no sympathy or empathy for simps, they deserve to die
/r/MensRights28/12/23 07:31 PM
3

Male feminists = cuttlefish sexual.strategy A.K.A. sneaky fucker's game
/r/MensRights28/12/23 12:38 AM
1

We need to say "women do it too" and use the tu quoques fallacy like they do, and win.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 09:01 PM
1

No we need to say "women do it too" and use the tu quoques fallacy like they do, and win.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 09:01 PM
1

Such a heroine
/r/MensRights24/12/23 11:00 AM
1

All good, honourable and hard to disagree with. Now name just ONE soldier who died in WW2 doing exactly what you described. See now how even the best of intentions don't make sense?
/r/MensRights24/12/23 08:19 AM
1

Can single men use surrogacy?
/r/MensRights24/12/23 12:47 AM
2

No if the person who invites owes the other one then if you invite her for coffee and she grabs you by the hand and enters a restaurant then the bill is on her, while the coffee is on you. But obviously women's stance that "who invites" should pay will not be applied in this case, they're just using the fact that it's socially mandated that men ask women out and so they try to find a rationale to keep being opportunistic
/r/MensRights24/12/23 12:46 AM
2

That won't work since many times it happens that you ask a woman out for coffee or a walk, then she proposes a restaurant of drags you in it. By that logic she should pay but it's never the case
/r/MensRights23/12/23 11:56 PM
1

There's no way to separate a man's opinion from his sexual strategy unless you've been very very very successful with women and had hundreds AND developed a keen interest for intersexual dynamics. As a result of it any tradcon will try to force their "views" onto others and - spoilers alert - they all invariably coincide with their strengths (work hard, be noble, wash your socks, wipe your ass, clean your room, be an upstanding citizen) while simultaneously demonise the other side of hypergamy (…
/r/MensRights23/12/23 07:20 PM
1

Why chads? We didn't do anything to deserve it
/r/MensRights21/12/23 04:58 PM
1

The best pill is paper abortion
/r/MensRights19/12/23 06:27 AM
3

Had they not had pussy, they wouldn't be able to afford taking one of those jobs though. Men 'choose' more dangerous jobs because they are blackmailed by hypergamy, unless you are 9'1 with a 12-pack abs
/r/MensRights10/12/23 04:37 PM
31

I used to swing with one of my plates and once she enthusiastically went down on a girl. Then she asked me whether I had ever done it with a man. When I said no she said "well because that would be the end of it, I couldn't have sex with you anymore". And I thought "shut up bish you just did it to a woman dog!". Now she's in a relationship, they cohabitate and yet she texts me every day, I think she wants some D. Well nothing new, them girls have double standards.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 09:31 PM
3

If I died I wish my gf did that
/r/MensRights02/12/23 01:58 PM
5

Divorce her.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 01:54 PM
2

Me lol
/r/MensRights21/11/23 01:26 PM
1

I'm glad you made it!
/r/MensRights20/11/23 03:59 PM
3

Well done my man, how's your life now?
/r/MensRights18/11/23 11:47 AM
1

Don't worry bro' it's full of bisexual people out there and people respect them, you will be fine.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 01:00 PM
3

How ongoing is ongoing? Do you need a contract for every thrust?
/r/MensRights05/11/23 06:41 PM
0

Maybe you missed #metoo and fake allegations. It takes ONE fake accusation and you're potentially done for. The thing with this sub is that it's become the shadow of his former self, Illimitable Man wrote an interesting article about the strategic hara-kiri that most men do when joining the Red Pill by going too hyperagent mode on the male side and too hypoagent mode on the female. The Duluth model is there, just look at football stars etc, yes some may win but that's not the norm. Johnny Depp w…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/23 06:13 PM
-1

All good but the part where women's 'legitimate' concerns that men hold more power in a society is beta-cringe. The average woman possesses WAY more power than even a CEO or a famous actor. Most women know they can cheat the game by crying and they crybully men constantly and then unleash the authorities on them without any right just to get what they want
/r/TheRedPill05/11/23 05:33 AM
2

I'm so relieved I don't deserve her. Oh well I'll console myself with my thin blue eyed young Ukrainian gf
/r/MensRights04/11/23 09:58 PM
29

Do loose pussies also qualify?
/r/MensRights04/11/23 08:17 PM
4

I believe you, when you say "no" to a woman they never stop
/r/MensRights30/10/23 02:00 PM
5

C'mon it's not difficult, just suppress your emotions and go to a country where prostitution is legal and stop spending money on 304's. Simple.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 01:51 PM
1

1) Yes 2) No 3) Yes
/r/MensRights21/10/23 04:07 AM
1

Waggle a 10-inch one in front of them and they'll make up their minds. Guaranteed.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 02:20 PM
13

Not true
/r/MensRights14/10/23 10:38 AM
2

Lol reading this was an intellectual blowjob 🤣
/r/MensRights14/10/23 10:36 AM
2

Do you remember the "drop the B" camping in the UK?
/r/MensRights07/10/23 01:30 PM
1

Why not though? Is there any legal limitation or something?
/r/MensRights05/10/23 08:04 PM
2

Can I as a European come to the US and use surrogacy? For example I'll come with another European citizen who'll be the surrogate mother and then we're done? That sounds too good to be true
/r/MensRights05/10/23 08:10 AM
4

Sorry for your trouble mate, speaking of surrogates can you have a kid with them as a single man and become a single father?
/r/MensRights05/10/23 08:03 AM
1

I do cope with it, I only consider having kids out of wedlock or through sperm donation, but unfortunately the latter won't work since lesbian couples are very likely to sue for child support despite being strong and independent. They make you sign an agreement to bait you into doing it, it will obviously be tossed by the judge since no agreement concerning child support can be done pretty much anywhere in the world, I'm in Europe and that's a no-no. Then they manipulate making it seem like an e…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 07:30 AM
1

You've got 3 options: 1 get buttfucked by feminism 2 get buttfucked by tradcons 3 make your own rules and live your life Basically they're only vying over whose agenda you'll be enslaved to enact, that's why I suggest people listen to Jordan Peterson as much as they would a rabid feminist
/r/MensRights04/10/23 06:25 AM
3

Women lose their husbands willingly in the west, that's hardly a 'loss'
/r/MensRights03/10/23 10:23 PM
0

What I would do is this: enact a law that limits a spouse's liability in the aftermath of a divorce to the 50% of the cumulated yearly income earned during the period he/she was married. E.g. you were married for 4 years and earned 100K/year, your max expenditure will be 200K and that includes EVERYTHING (lawyer fees, alimony, child support, extra costs). The logic is similar to mandatory insurances in disaster-prone areas like tornados and the like. You as a citizen are covered against things o…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 09:58 PM
3

It's whatever the fuck the want it to mean in the moment in order to win arguments without having any rationale
/r/MensRights03/10/23 09:46 PM
8

Justice should be disbanded
/r/MensRights03/10/23 11:15 AM
3

If you didn't sign up for it, then you don't have an obligation
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:24 AM
1

I was circumcised against my will at one week of age, there's nothing wrong with you bro' just dump any 304 who requires you to undergo a medical procedure you didn't choose
/r/MensRights22/09/23 03:29 PM
5

Because in the neverending quest for reproduction men cannot afford to protect other men's interests because if you're a bully at the top (lawmaker) you've got only advantages vexing other men, you get unprecedented access to females, whereas they won't. As a woman though, it makes way more sense to act collectivistically for every woman could theoretically go after the same top 10-20% of men and reproduce, they are the incubators. Thinking that just because a man is in power he would help other…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 06:14 AM
2

More excuses. Regardless of whether it is malice or a biological limitation, what stays is that left-hemispherians' cancel culture is dangerous and harmful. I don't care if someone thinks X out of biology or pretends to think X out of malice, if the inevitable outcome is that that person joins a mob to harm other innocent people then the ones thinking or leveraging power plays to cancel others should be rendered unable to harm. That's the top one priority. Innocent people shouldn't bear the burd…
/r/MensRights20/09/23 06:48 PM
5

Consider yourself lucky then
/r/MensRights19/09/23 05:13 PM
2

It would be nice to know how many rings she's had on her ring finger to call herself a "specialist" lol
/r/MensRights19/09/23 08:59 AM
2

What's the difference between state murders and state-mandated cuckoldry? That state-mandated cuckoldry only kills your next generation, not the current one.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 07:25 AM
12

Exactly, but at the very least you'd be in the know. So you can drop the 304 back in France and start anew somewhere else
/r/MensRights19/09/23 07:16 AM
2

And I maintain it is utterly illegal. You proved nothing by merely pointing out that extraterritorial jurisdiction may be claimed. In the very link you posted it is written that extraterritorial jurisdiction applies if 1) the second country agrees to it - for example a treaty is in place - or 2) an external authority like an international court. Both conditions are not met, therefore it is CLAIMED extraterritorial jurisdiction. You - reasoning like a woman - just pointed out that it exists. A co…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 07:10 AM
1

Link please. I mean the drugs were used and consumed there not carried to the UEA
/r/MensRights19/09/23 07:02 AM
20

Yeah but if the mother (French) abducts the kids (French) without the permission of the father (French) she will walk away scott free
/r/MensRights18/09/23 06:26 PM
3

So women going to Kenya or Jamaica or anywhere else to 'find themselves' will be prosecuted? Sweet.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 06:24 PM
23

Yes, just don't come back to France and don't abide by this law des mes deux
/r/MensRights18/09/23 06:23 PM
8

So what? Doesn't matter if it exists, it's still an abuse. Most French people go to Spain where it's legal so 1) it's not an uncovered area nor is it 2) legal in force of a treaty. So the theoretical bases for it to happen are void - and they are contained in the link you sent - they just do it because they can
/r/MensRights18/09/23 06:21 PM
138

This is utterly illegal. France has jurisdiction over HER own territory, not another country. That's just a dictatorship at this point. If I smoke weed in the Netherlands, I can't be sentenced to death in the UAE, why? The fact happened in another country. France is bullying her citizens - I mean subjects - bad, this time.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 01:22 PM
1

No you're a sexist and should be punished. Also white-knighting should be punished, it already is punishable under the umbrella concept of DIY justice but it's not enforced
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:41 AM
1

304's or 5304, just pick up one
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:32 AM
8

Not to mention that cleaners are usually female
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:28 AM
3

Women are doing what the nazis did but society isn't ready to accept it
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:27 AM
6

Excuse me but I just don't feel like
/r/MensRights15/09/23 04:11 PM
1

So does Bolt
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:05 PM
2

Because it's confirmation they won. No alpha man would undergo a vasectomy, so their narcissism kicks in and reminds them they've just seduced a beta male into undergoing genetic hara-kiri, thus they won for they removed an undesired mate from the pool
/r/MensRights14/09/23 09:35 AM
5

We should reopen asylums and let these people in en masse before they keep harming otherwise innocent people
/r/MensRights14/09/23 09:33 AM
0

Because hypergamy filters out beta males.bsorry for swimming against the current here but you need to spend a decade banging 304's until you know what you're doing. No woman is gonna take accountability or teach you how. They will simply replace you.
/r/MensRights28/08/23 07:26 PM
0

A nice way to solve the conundrum is to hire professionals to do everything. At that point she won't be having the excuse of unpaid labour and you can shame her back if she works/earns less than you do. But it's petty so, don't get married in the first place.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 06:11 AM
5

Yes passing shit tests is emotional labour for us. Coping with the fact that women never put any effort to communicate in a more logic-oriented way, while we study countless books on game is emotional labour for us.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 06:09 AM
104

Because they don't want to woman down
/r/MensRights15/08/23 12:47 PM
5

Where is the study? Lol
/r/MensRights15/08/23 10:54 AM
2

Sure, now the other side of the coin: be virgin, be young and thin, don't talk too much, don't have an attitude be loyal both sexually and socially learn to give great head don't spend all the money on frivolous things educate the kids along with him and fight state brainwashing don't be a feminist
/r/MensRights15/08/23 09:56 AM
2

Wasn't it while he was dying?
/r/MensRights15/08/23 09:50 AM
2

Yeah and he conveniently forgets about the 'alpha fucks' side of hypergamy almost all the time. The guy's slowly becoming purple-pilled but then he remembers he became a celebrity to get some and defaults back to pleasing women, therefore gaming the system.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 09:45 AM
2

The real Red Pill here is that both the feminists AND the tradcons are after you, whoever comes first screws you over. Even if 80% of men magically improved and turned into Orlando Bloom, hypergamy would still pick the Brad Pitt's and they'd be miserable again. Self growth is a trap. While it is good in moderation, it is fallacious thinking that just by improving you'd get some. First of all it's not true. Then you get waaaaaay more pussy by going dark triad then to the gym or becoming a high-ea…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 09:41 AM
1

Well she's pretty skilled at raping people and with good references /s
/r/MensRights15/08/23 09:28 AM
14

Wait a min, is that guy me? Oh of course not, 2 hours is a lot, I work 1 lmao.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 07:05 AM
2

Oh I was called sooooo insecure after a woman led me on booking a holiday, she was future-forecasting all the sex we would have had and details and all. Then AFTER I booked she gave me the 'I have to clarify expectations' speech and said we wouldn't have had sex, to which I replied that I was fine with that but I had to clarify mine: I wasn't gonna take her out on dates/dinners and that if I chose so I would be on my own depending on how things would change and asked her whether she was fine wit…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 07:03 AM
0

Actually we are criminalised waaaaay more than them 2304. I wish we had the same anti-slut-shaming clout they do. The thing is, beta guys can't side with alphas but women can side with hoze. So in a democracy it's always women + betas vs alphas AND women + alphas vs betas depending on the matter. Pussy is antifragile so in this case, being in an "alpha fucks" matter BUT the issue being commitment - an inherently beta thing - you'll have betas + women Vs alphas. If it was mandatory paternity test…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 01:11 AM
3

Marcus Aurelius and Niccolò Machiavelli are two sides of the same coin, you can't win without a balance
/r/MensRights01/08/23 12:41 AM
12

We also need artificial wombs
/r/MensRights31/07/23 05:52 AM
13

Well prolonged dick deficiency brings the worst out of wymmn
/r/MensRights31/07/23 05:42 AM
1

Lack of empathy. The empathy gap is very real.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 05:40 AM
3

Good bot, you deserve love, we're fighting for bots' rights, too
/r/MensRights30/07/23 10:58 AM
15

Female paedophilic behaviour isn't discussed appropriately
/r/MensRights30/07/23 10:53 AM
6

I am in favour of men getting married. Let's marry our best friend, he'll keep his 304's, we'll keep our 304's AND we don't even have to be gay! It's same-sex marriage, not gay marriage.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 10:45 AM
9

I would get married too if I were entitled to primary/sole custody, the house and she would be legally obliged to put out every single month after the divorce or go to jail. That's why I understand women's will to get married /s
/r/MensRights30/07/23 09:26 AM
9

More random bullshit to defend ourselves from
/r/MensRights29/07/23 12:12 PM
14

Black women are fair.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 02:58 PM
3

I would like to introduce the concept of "piss test" as a rational opposition to shit tests. I already know that this is gonna trigger the community but we should break free from the "hyperagency for the masculine/hypoagency for the feminine" logic we default to when analysing women's shit tests. Shit tests are a tool, and a tool can be used effectively or not, efficiently or not. Sometimes women's shit tests are so miscalibered or thoughtless that I think "oh shit I've heard this 1000 times bef…
/r/TheRedPill26/07/23 07:17 AM
1

But but but the limited edition is amazing! She comes with Tanya and Lyudmila and Beta Ken. Beta Ken takes them on holiday just to show Natasha how good a prospect he is and then they ditch him for Pool guy Chad (TM) and Jet ski driver Tyrone (TM).
/r/MensRights24/07/23 06:58 AM
5

Don't forget about gold digging Natasha
/r/MensRights22/07/23 11:35 AM
-2

Bro' what's the problem? If anything, it means it's working. Keep it up 🙂👏🏻
/r/MensRights22/07/23 09:41 AM
8

I've said it before and will say it again: they managed to make Nazis look like toddlers in the kindergarten
/r/MensRights22/07/23 08:25 AM
4

And this, my friends, is the ultimate confession. Imho people, not just men, should be given the right to opt out of society if they so desire. I didn't ask to be born in a society. People should be given a fixed amount of land as a baseline and grow their crops and fuck everyone else.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 08:23 AM
2

Mwahahahha
/r/MensRights20/07/23 10:03 PM
6

HR Guybrush Threepwood is using a rubber chicken, help!
/r/MensRights20/07/23 10:00 PM
5

Paternity tests bro
/r/MensRights16/07/23 06:48 PM
5

Prove that she sacrificed her career and had she stayed she would have had the career most people claim they'd had. It's simply economically not true. Most people work their asses off for decades without having any appreciable career boost. Most people are qualified for higher positions without eventually getting them. You can cry you would become X and be entitled to X, but maybe in real life you would have never attained X. In other words the sun total of people's delusions when they cry is wa…
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:52 PM
2

Bro' this is literally game-changing. Shout out for our Indian brothers
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:28 PM
45

Is it me or there's a not so subtle admission that they marry for money? How would that erode marriage if you're marrying for love? Lmao!
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:16 PM
13

No offense bro' but an autistic woman is wife material. Bonus points if she's poor and doesn't use social media.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 11:50 AM
15

It's gaslighting. Just say "your point was disproven long ago, it's sad that there are still people like you"
/r/MensRights29/06/23 06:32 AM
3

We need to make it by default that whenever a child is born the parents need to name a house for the child. No one can take the child without both parents'written consent. No one is allowed in apart from the biological parents. If they both give written consent to thirds being there it's ok, else the parent a third person enters the premises with goes to jail. Visitation rights will be 100% and 100% of the time for both parents in that house, if parents do not agree on how the child should spend…
/r/MensRights29/06/23 06:05 AM
1

That's some good stuff, have some more to spare?
/r/MensRights28/06/23 06:39 AM
3

If you're negotiable, you already lost
/r/MensRights28/06/23 05:55 AM
1

I know that bro' but what does it have to do with acronyms?
/r/MensRights28/06/23 05:49 AM
2

The truth is men learn and adapt to communicate more in a feminine way, but women don't. Why? They don't need to, they've got pussy. On top of that sexual strategies are adversarial, but by and large it's only men who can go for non-zero-sum games. In the aggregate women can't, maybe someone can but don't rely too much on it. Then, how do you conjugate open straightforward masculine way with indirect, subtle mainly passive-agressive female way of communicating? You can't. And, even more importan…
/r/MensRights27/06/23 05:21 PM
2

There's a special place in hell for people who use acronyms
/r/MensRights26/06/23 12:19 PM
29

Don't excuse her. She leveraged her sexuality and let some others do the dirty work for her. Women use violence by proxy. Letting herself age is all she wants.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 10:29 AM
2

Society is based on lying to men in order to allocate responsibility more "efficiently" in the eyes of the sociopaths that govern each and every society. You're not an individual worthy or respect and that should be shielded from pain, for example against cuckoldry like you described, you're a cog in a machine and you're only worth for your utility to the collective. Therefore, any attempt to give men a choice will be silenced. How can the parasites live if you make it harder for them to exploit…
/r/MensRights26/06/23 10:23 AM
45

Yes but she should be included. This is like contract killing, the difference being she's not even gonna put out for it and will coquettishly back off.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 10:11 AM
9

Their problem. Why do you care? Whenever I walk at night and women behave as if I were a rapist I keep behaving normally and don't care if they're startled. In my brain it registers as them being the bad guys for thinking bad stuff about me. Do that with regard to any other category and you're something that ends in ist or phobe. They wrong us by thinking that way, never the other way around.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 09:47 AM
23

I disagree, although vigilante justice is fallible so is court justice. If the State has the monopoly of justice then it needs to GUARANTEE that each decision will be made according to reals-over-feels. We know this not to be true in the least. We should introduce the concept that the punishment for a false allegation is the same as the worst outcome the victim suffered.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 09:33 AM
87

Jail/execute her depending on the state.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 09:30 AM
2

Every woman who goes on a dinner date knowing damn well that there won't be anything more than that is a gold digger. It literally happens hundreds of times to the average guy.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 02:17 PM
2

No, it's just that communism-leaning people have an ill concealed hatred towards the rich. When men cannot compete on the alpha-side of hypergamy, they will on the beta-bucks side. If on top of not being able to compete physique-wise they're also broke then the outrage plays out. It's literally everywhere in society. Just notice a guy in his 40s driving a Ferrari and sure AF there will be hundreds of men hating on him for no other reason than jealousy.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 02:14 PM
3

Thanks for confirming red-pill truths.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:09 PM
1

Finally. The truth is out. Well done.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:07 PM
18

I was raped several times but I'm not a survivor. A survivor is someone who goes to war and comes back. Change my mind.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:04 PM
3

That's their game, they can't afford to give straightforward honest definitions for you would corner them so they use the usual trickery: they outcry you, bulky you, even assault you, they blend in the herd and have things their way out of sheer intimidation. That's what feminism does.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 07:39 AM
1

Now you're gonna piss off the bot that says that water isn't wet, it's something else that basically means wet but not just wet
/r/MensRights21/06/23 03:08 PM
16

Do you want to stop false allegations or not? Why should stupidity/delusion be an advantage over clarity of mind and the truth? If they're in bad faith, they should be punished. If they're in good faith yet the allegation is still false, then a man's reputation isn't worth less than a woman's delusion.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 08:01 PM
5

It's a nice plot twist in my opinion, you were expecting it at the end but surprise suprise it's at the beginning!
/r/MensRights19/06/23 06:24 PM
1

Imagine 20% of women outearn their husbands, half of them pay for household expenses, were left off with the 10% of chads who can exploit them
/r/MensRights19/06/23 06:23 PM
9

Sorry for your loss but let's not become like them, leave hypoagency to the feminists. He should have told them to fuck off and gone to the gym instead
/r/MensRights19/06/23 06:20 PM
23

Just false not malicious, otherwise they'll claim it's a mistake in good faith when they get caught
/r/MensRights19/06/23 06:17 PM
2

Hubris
/r/MensRights19/06/23 08:44 AM
2

You lost it and on top of that misunderstood what I meant. Everybody is gay with someone else's ass means that when a person in a position to give advice, or exercise power, whose consequence will be paid by someone else, the advice is always extreme for all you're doing is dumping the fragility on someone else. How hypocritical to say that they should stay and fight, all they would accomplish is to die pointlessly. Every human being (read man) had better save his own hide fore and foremost, ins…
/r/MensRights19/06/23 07:42 AM
2

In my culture we say "everybody is gay with someone else's ass"
/r/MensRights19/06/23 07:10 AM
0

There are videos of Ukrainian soldiers nailing a Russian POW into a cross then they set it on fire. The guy was burnt alive
/r/MensRights19/06/23 06:48 AM
2

Bro' a person fleeing conscription is a person who despises - and fears - the atrocities of war. Would would be his fault at that point? Having the wrong nationality? If MORE people relocated it would be amazing for there would be LESS war if you know what I mean
/r/MensRights19/06/23 06:46 AM
1

Not huge, but we are treated better for sure.
/r/MensRights18/06/23 06:00 PM
18

Because they can't get pussy, so they play beta game which is to identify with the feminine. They are the Reddit equivalent of guys who join the (fake) beating of a man in social experiment videos where an actress pretends to batter a guy.
/r/MensRights18/06/23 04:14 PM
31

Women most affected /s The single most important men's right there is, is the right not to be drafted
/r/MensRights18/06/23 04:12 PM
2

Well I spin plates like crazy but relationships are not the way they used to be anymore
/r/MensRights17/06/23 05:54 PM
1

What of you don't like the thought of frequenting hookers, like me?
/r/MensRights16/06/23 09:13 PM
16

Transgenderism is leveraged by the elites to bring about the denatalism project full-effing-stop. No hate intended, guys/girls if you fall for that trick you now know what's gonna happen.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 07:23 PM
7

Oh so women had sexual activity without my consent several times
/r/MensRights16/06/23 06:40 PM
2

That's also women's choices. When was the last time you saw a 6/10 or even 7/10 woman being so desperate to marry a single father and take care of kids?
/r/TheRedPill16/06/23 06:26 AM
1

I think I'm "damaged" as in protectively anti-social. If she guarantees to me with the fact that we're partners and outmanoeuvre the state then yes, I'm in it. Else, I'm out. But most women wouldn't renounce their "protections" which are actually attacking tools.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/23 06:25 AM
2

I met 3 virgins in their mid 30s. One was a 5/10 seeking marriage so I told her I'm not into it. One was a 9/10 we tried to have sex on our second date but I came immediately, what a failure. Then I caught her on dating apps twice and kicked her out. One was a 6/10 we had sex on our 3rd date, even though the 2nd was a 30-min walk. She was my 8th virgin, and then we stayed together a couple of weeks. She mandated I change my eating habits and drop my hobbies for her, I told her I wasn't gonna was…
/r/TheRedPill16/06/23 06:19 AM
11

Chad Thundercock's bay lmao
/r/MensRights15/06/23 07:36 PM
5

I wouldn't be surprised if they did just that
/r/MensRights15/06/23 05:46 PM
3

Wow are you my double? EVERYTHING you wrote resonates.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:57 PM
21

Sure. Care to explain the double standard?
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:54 PM
19

Time to start using the 'loose pussy energy' retaliation
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:44 PM
2

What a pick-me man. Since when has science operates according to the feels-over-reels model rather than data analysis. On top of that, who gets to ascertain whether something is misogynistic or not? There are 897 working days between the two dates, the number of messages is 3.6 millions. Now, if you spend as low as 5 seconds per comment to "analyze" it, it shows that he would have spent 5,5 hours per day doing that. If you spent 10 seconds per comment is 11 hours and so on, that only means that …
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:43 PM
1

Because straight men need more people like good ol' Milo Yiannopoulos, not today's version though
/r/MensRights13/06/23 07:24 PM
8

"mistakes were made" on steroids
/r/MensRights13/06/23 06:11 PM
1

🙈😮
/r/MensRights10/06/23 06:13 PM
7

This..it's about time we address society's inner fabric. How long will we be able to tolerate that whatever a judge says is the rule? Without punishment for bad behaviour? Beta judges are a plague, their decisions are by no means fair or good for society.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 04:54 AM
0

Most men can't. Pussy is antifragile so women will coalise with the alphas when it's about maximising the alpha-fucks side of hypergamy (e.g. no paternity tests) and with the betas when it's about maximising the beta-bucks side of hypergamy (e.g. alimony) It's beta men's game to throw a man under the bus for personal gain. Imagine you're 5'1 and you advocate for such groups to be removed, guess who also is gonna be removed by the genes pool? It's like men watching a woman beating a guy, if they …
/r/MensRights08/06/23 04:47 AM
1

Your house is a non-marital asset. If you sell it AND put the money in a shared bank account that's a marital asset. You lose if you do. You mistake was moving into your house to begin with. Try to convince her to get rent a bigger one, then bail.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 02:53 PM
6

Draft hoefficers
/r/MensRights03/06/23 07:29 PM
2

What's the highest penalty in each country for deserting?
/r/MensRights03/06/23 07:29 PM
1

They're going wok... oops freudian slip I mean broke very soon
/r/MensRights03/06/23 07:06 PM
4

Has anybody noticed the (supposedly) tear-jerking videos of Ukrainian dogs trapped in the rubble and what we should do to help them? Cause I sure af have, but I also was sent videos of soldiers - POWs actually - CRUCIFIED then the cross was set ABLAZE while the guy was screaming. Nobody. Gave. A. Fuck.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 07:20 AM
2

Women will support you provided you have 3 SMV points more than her. It happens to me all the time but it's ugly women, my cuter gf have a lower threshold of empathy. If we're equal you're really pushing it. If they are 10's you won't receive any no matter what.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 07:01 AM
15

Toxic femininity
/r/MensRights02/06/23 09:00 PM
1

Well Rollo Tomassi said "women are utterly incapable of loving a man IN THE WAY he wishes to be loved". Had he said "men have unrealistic expectations about how women should love them" bonus points if he added "they have the expectation that said love be akin to motherly love" he wouldn't have been misunderstood. Beginner's mistake.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/23 07:37 PM
5

We need to do something. Female professionals are women first and secondarily professionals.society cannot work when one gender prioritises intra-gender bias over the collective. False claims don't register in most women's minds because safety has the top priority who cares if some innocent is socially slaughtered in the process.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 03:39 PM
-1

Women have a hard time dissociating description from endorsement. Thanks for clarifying.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 01:37 PM
5

That someone has a name: Rollo Tomassi
/r/MensRights28/05/23 01:31 PM
1

"We are better than them" and yet we are losing. Why? Because people are constrained by their strengths rather than their weaknesses. If you speak 20 languages and I speak one, we're bound to speaking that one if we are to communicate. Stooping down at their level is a necessity. Look! Ukrainian soldiers are shooting the Russians instead of preaching on the battlefield. You become who you fight against or you lose.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 01:26 PM
3

Ok but there's a difference between competitive and unjust.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 09:40 AM
7

Sounds like me, but it wasn't a teacher
/r/MensRights28/05/23 09:39 AM
2

Cucknada lol. I bet the most of he taxes comes from male taxpayers
/r/MensRights25/05/23 07:34 AM
1

It identifies as yellow
/r/MensRights24/05/23 06:37 PM
7

That's wishful thinking. Again, there's an asymmetry right there: if you change women's behaviour you affect men's. However, if you change men's you won't affect women's. They're evolutionarily solipsistic and hypergamous, it just doesn't work. How many 3's do you know who say "goddamn! I'm a 3! That's why I'm single! On top of that I've got an attitude that's why men stay away from me, I need to act on those things" Vs how many men you know go to the gym and try to make more money? You can go M…
/r/MensRights22/05/23 06:38 AM
2

That's the mentality. I got in a lot of trouble for suggesting the same, but sanctimony has permeated the MRM. I'm not saying there aren't women who are rational or can have a debate, there are and since it's extremely rare for men to find empathy I immediately feel positive feelings of camaraderie whenever they write anything, which is usually extremely smart. As for the others, they can't be reason with, not even beta males can. It's like playing football and asking the other team to make you …
/r/MensRights22/05/23 06:21 AM
2

Yep education is worth 10 wars. The government, however, will contrive always new ways to squeeze beta guys. Fastforward 10 years and if you bang the same woman 2-3 times you retroactively are considered married. It's like in the '70s with the free love movement, after women figured out they were basically handing out free sex to men society had to change the rules of the game to make things work.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 09:04 PM
2

To a female mind, that you correctly call solipsistic having a great job instead of staying at home being protected and provided for enables hypergamy. They think that men think like women do and so a woman having a career is actually desirable. Big fat laugh to their delusion. The 'empowerment' movement is nothing but unbridling hypergamy, if women can "take care of themselves" it means they can all get impregnated by alpha seed BUT the beta need ceases to be for she works for herself. Before t…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 04:04 PM
2

Wow that's a solid point! It's all about social marketing after all, feminists attack by portraying themselves as the victim, to a mind that reasons in binary extremes that's enough to justify a counterattack (which in reality is an attack) to "make things even"
/r/MensRights21/05/23 11:34 AM
19

Again, hypergamy at play.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 06:17 AM
1

Ok but the problem with that is that all the high-road "equity" can and will be destroyed in future generations. The allies fought to eliminate nazism, now some.of those ideas are resurfacing. This means that if they do then all that you achieved can be taken away in future generations. If the choice was between longer bust stable and immediate but unstable, yes, the high road would pay off but in this case it doesn't. The land of freedom has been taken hostage by wokesism, in the meantime peopl…
/r/MensRights21/05/23 06:13 AM
24

If I'm doing the time might as well do the crime mentality. That's what happens. They could easily stop the vexing but choose to perpetrate it
/r/MensRights21/05/23 05:56 AM
2

I've been swinging for 13 years with women I date and currently am in poly with 5 women. No intention to get married or cohabitate with them and let me tell you, that's the norm! They hate men too! You need to make a choice between banging them all or satisfying your ideology. In swinger clubs there are a lot of common areas and women can demand single guys be removed at their behest. The codephrase is "I don't feel X". Even if the guy stays in a corner and vocalises his intention not to interac…
/r/MensRights20/05/23 06:48 PM
1

What about time? Time passes and while you're taking the high road innocents will suffer in droves. Isn't it your responsibility to prevent that from happening? We know from decades of experience that women don't vote to make society work better, they just vote for their interests, most of the times at the expense of men's AND they never stop back, they ALWAYS find something petty to fight for regardless of how much pain that causes to man. Allowing that is evil.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 05:02 PM
1

That's right the man shouldn't be denied a test. It is to easy for me to go tu quoques on women's asses and point out that: They want taller/more muscular guy for protection They want richer guys for resources which is an insurance for the future They want a guy to be a leader of man as a proxy for emotional intelligence They want a man who is ambitious because it's a proxy for creative intelligence And many others. If women are in the right to be offended at "mistrust" if a man asks for a pater…
/r/MensRights20/05/23 04:58 PM
0

Do you realise that they fight in the way he described above. There's no winning with this approach, and many innocent men will suffer.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 04:35 PM
0

By this logic every domestic violence case is the victim's fault. Men need to stop to use hyperagency on men and hypoagency on women.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 04:29 PM
1

Women shit-test all the time and their fears and need for security is universally validated by the law, family counselors, alimony, the fact that child support can only go up but not down, etc. Why aren't you using the same logic? Her indignation is an interest that should lose priority over the right to know of the father for the undeniable reason that the worst possible outcome for men far outweighs the worst possible outcome for women. If the problem is slut shaming - pro tip it's not, it's j…
/r/MensRights20/05/23 04:22 PM
1

We should either normalise them or have a randomised system that swaps children in hospitals, something like a lottery. If women object to that, then their opinion shouldn't be taken seriously and they would just show their true colours.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 04:15 PM
1

Sorry to be straightforward but it's because most of you guys are beta. And, yes, most men are beta in any country but there are levels of cuckery.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 04:10 PM
1

Wonderful. Let's make an app to check if women are work as much as men.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 03:57 PM
1

Beta judges are becoming a problem to deal with
/r/MensRights20/05/23 03:57 PM
6

Feminism enacts anti-biology laws all the time
/r/MensRights20/05/23 03:25 PM
5

If the interest of the child comes first, then this 13 year old child's interest should come first. But we all know that the interest of the child is another shady tactic to say "the interest of the mother"
/r/MensRights20/05/23 11:30 AM
1

Ok, but our growth is CONSTRAINED by our strength, so improving also means stepping out of the proverbial comfort zone by training our weaknesses
/r/TheRedPill16/05/23 05:23 PM
3

The Minifem not even Orwell could have imagined that
/r/MensRights16/05/23 05:19 PM
3

This post is one of the reasons why this subreddit has lost so much of its educational value. NEVER be yourself unless you're Gigachad, and even then struggle to improve.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/23 12:28 PM
0

If you can't afford food, don't eat. Oh wait now I'm a bad person, right?
/r/MensRights13/05/23 03:34 PM
1

Lol that was my main purpose, I wouldn't bother with ruling the world though
/r/MensRights09/05/23 07:35 PM
5

Yeah looks like a grift, they don't cause they have the law on their side
/r/MensRights09/05/23 05:28 PM
9

The irony is that the "fail" to see when beta men associate with the feminine. At this point it is fair to say that a woman who shames another for siding with "the patriarchy" loses the right to say her beta orbiters are "just friends". You can't see it in a way but not in the other.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 06:02 PM
7

Bro it's basic maths, if she makes 3K and he makes 4K, then she makes 7K.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:46 PM
7

It might well be your wife collecting ammo against you
/r/MensRights07/05/23 06:38 AM
2

Which is another men's right we need. I use that very tactic and let them progressively lose attraction, but they can just be done in one second. We need to educate women to take rejection to the chin, we don't owe them machiavelillinism in order to end a relationship. We need equality.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 06:35 AM
4

Men are often disrespected in society, we still have a lot to do to educated people to respect men. Imagine the backlash if a man complained about something like that. It literally happens hundreds of times, even worse than 2 hours, it's months of simping + a lot of money
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:40 PM
14

And who's the norm? Lmao you're delusional
/r/MensRights05/05/23 02:11 PM
10

You misspelled post-wall women dude
/r/MensRights05/05/23 02:09 PM
0

I don't find most women who are 10 years younger than me attractive, so what? Double standards. Women are entitle to hypergamy, we are entitled to our mating strategy as well.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 02:01 PM
2

Yes but men are traumatised by cuckoldry, women aren't, since biologically it means that your genes don't get to pass onto the next generation and you are forced to take care of someone else's offspring by law. I don't see many women being punished like rapists for that. Women have all the right to be traumatised since rape removes hypergamous control over the choice of a mate, that's why we need the same punishment for each sex forcing their own strategy on the other.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 06:34 AM
2

"More should be done" equals "mistakes were made"
/r/MensRights02/05/23 06:51 AM
1

Yelling is not abuse. It's actually a pretty good indicator that someone else is abusing you. Change my mind.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 09:29 PM
2

Imagine if rape was legal. Paternity fraud is the real equivalent of rape for you force one sex's strategy on the other. I was raped more than once, but i don't care. But sure as fuck I would go bezerk if my child weren't mine.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 09:25 PM
1

Shouldn't it be 50-50. One uses it up, the other down, one movement each. Equality.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 10:48 AM
-2

Ok, WW3 has started
/r/MensRights29/04/23 10:40 AM
2

You only picked up one item out of 10 because it was the most easily attackable AND because you were triggered. That's what SJWs do, very easy to spot. On top of that you're completely silent about what a solution could be and use the tu quoques fallacy (men do it too), and straw man (accusing me indirectly of limiting their inability to act on their delusions "they have a right"). Fine I have a right to call you delusion and suggest you do something about it - IF OP's will is "helping men" of c…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 08:43 AM
2

Ok I'm talking with an emotional person no point continuing. I was actually on the other side and that helped a lot, hope they'll get the recognition they deserve.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:28 AM
2

You've got the right to, doesn't mean I'm depriving you of said right by pointing this out, nor does it mean you should do it just because you have a right to it. I've got a right to stick an oil bottle in my ass, bus is it stupid if if did it? Yes. She asked what to do, I gave her an answer. Now she's free to discard it if she wants to. In the big numbers having realistic expectations of the dating market does indeed help men. Back in the day there were heroes keeping women's egos in check, the…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:11 AM
1

Or rather be honest in your judgement, if you're a 3, don't go for a 9.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:52 AM
3

Yeah you're right but it's already a step forward if a woman is asking. It won't change much but still
/r/MensRights23/04/23 03:37 PM
5

1) Push for mandatory paternity tests, shared custody and the removal of alimony 2) Push for the State not to be involved in marriage in any case 3) Push for the abolition of the draft 4) Push for the abolition of "positive discrimination" 5) Push for 50-50 in difficult fields like mining and oil rigs 6) Push for equal sentencing and punishments 7) Push for children not to be circumcised nor drugged 8) Don't be hypergamous 9) Don't engage in emotionally draining activities like overtalking and m…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 11:19 AM
-1

So now the attention is on me, and what you think I feel like rather than the problem itself which is the risk of getting married. Typical.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 07:07 AM
3

I thought it was prisoners of war who got nailed to the cross and then set on fire who were... But maybe I should reconsider /s
/r/MensRights19/04/23 10:51 AM
17

A friend of mine is a millionaire. Owns villas throughout Europe, a Yacht, several expensive cars and his wife obviously is 29 years his junior. He made the mistake of buying a hair saloon for her despite my desperate advice not to. Now she's legally the owner of the place, he has to pay for 3 employees and now she stopped having sex with him. Divorce will come soon. As a general rule men should discard the 'economic dependency' excuse women shame men with. If a guy takes the bait he'll end up s…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 06:39 AM
-11

Bro' you're not attractive enough. Do NOT work or support anyone who's detrimental to your own health/happiness. Don't reward bad behaviour. Go to the gym and bang other women, possibly married. The key to having appreciation and a fulfilling sexual life with a wife is to fuck someone else's. Like the one I'm rawdogging right now likes to put it "children are blood of your blood, my husband is a stranger". And obviously doesn't use contraception with the guys she meets online. And I know it suck…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 06:33 AM
3

I wish it was simple but there are literally thousands of groups if you use the usual keywords.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 02:39 AM
19

I'll explain but I doubt you're being fair on this sub. Most women shame men into doing things that benefit them (the women) by calling immature or other silly names whenever they don't do whatever benefits them, and calling good whatever does - and then they reward men who don't fall for these manipulations with sex. So even though "most people want to sleep with their fiance before marriage" that's indicative of nothing. Most men would commit to, start mortgages and work their asses off to pay…
/r/MensRights10/04/23 01:45 AM
14

The problem is finding the group, I asked my girlfriends to find the one I'm in but they failed. There should be some customer service that investigates the matter and grants you access to "female only" group and then sue them.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 01:32 AM
21

So move the timeline one month before marriage, does my statement apply?
/r/MensRights10/04/23 12:55 AM
40

Funny how you all get triggered while all I did was reverse the usual "real men are (insert here what she needs)" trope you'll hear 100 times a day by women.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 12:43 AM
58

A real woman is thin and virgin. Hate in 3...2...1...
/r/MensRights09/04/23 09:12 PM
1

That's bullshit. False still needs to be proven, the straw man here is equating unsubstantiated evidence with convincing, whereas in court you still need to prove malice in the case of false allegation.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 09:11 PM
9

Only if you manage to concentrate all the efforts in one generation. Notoriously younger generations are deaf to older generation's problems. You fight a lot, in the meantime the you ger ones don't know what you're talking about and all you fought for is gone.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 08:13 PM
8

They're a testament to women's inability to use justice the way it should be according to the laws. It's always gonna be about solipsism, double standards, indignation and retribution. E.g.: the tinder swindler did onto women what any attractive woman did onto men, they finessed the opposite sex. In the case of women they got the short end of the stick not getting commitment, in the case of men they kept simping not getting any pussy. BUT when it came to the tinder swindler guy the documentary w…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 07:58 PM
28

And your solution to make men's lives better is?
/r/MensRights09/04/23 07:54 PM
1

If men looked like Gigachad consumerism wouldn't exist and women would content themselves with a wooden hut and stale bread three times a day. That's obviously men's fault for not looking like Gigachad /s This is stupid, it's not a gendered issues
/r/MensRights06/04/23 06:39 PM
-2

Doesn't hold water since one pussy can unleash dozens of other man even against an innocent one.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 04:08 PM
1

She can roll over and break 207/206
/r/MensRights05/04/23 07:25 PM
1

Wait a minute, how's this anti-British? Because the video is in English? Maybe it's just because English is (one of) the international language. Or am I missing something?
/r/MensRights01/04/23 04:30 PM
-18

What's the problem? She's menopausal anyway, he's not gonna raise any other man's child. Just do the same 🙂👊🏻
/r/MensRights01/04/23 04:18 PM
25

Once I met a man in his 40s with a stunning 20 year old, he was talking shit about cocktails and videos of cats and stupid memes, the guy in an entrepreneur and had a great physique. When the chick went away he transformed into a monster of knowledge and we started to talk about philosophy and interesting stuff, so my friend and I asked him why he was talking about shit before and he said it doesn't work with them chicks, you have to pretend you're fine with dining, sipping cocktails and take pi…
/r/TheRedPill16/03/23 03:05 PM
4

Meanwhile Rosa Parks was a hero /hate in 3...2...1...
/r/MensRights11/03/23 09:10 AM
4

The problem with feminists is that they would always introduce a theoretical foreward in every law they make. Whoever's got a legal mindset would dismiss each and every one of these law due to the impossibility of proving the content of the preamble - but we know the world works differently. Ex: “abusive and humiliating” male behaviour which is claimed stops women “fully participating in society”. Here - theoretically - you'd have to prove that his intent is "abusive" and "humiliating". Now, if …
/r/MensRights11/03/23 09:01 AM
5

This happened to me more than once
/r/MensRights11/03/23 08:48 AM
1

I don't believe for a second this was written by a former inmate
/r/MensRights01/03/23 09:30 PM
1

I wouldn't
/r/MensRights01/03/23 09:14 PM
1

Because it's true, also the process of rainbow-f-word-ization of men isn't helping. Today I was strolling looking at a bell tower and I bumped into a guy who was walking straight trying hard to act alpha. Me "sorry" Him "don't be sorry" Then he mumbles something then Him "actually be sorry + some other gibberish" Then he turns around like a fucking passive-aggressive pussy. I could have fucked him up blindfolded since the guy was scrawny. That's the average interaction a man has on a daily life,…
/r/MensRights01/03/23 12:51 PM
-4

Do you have proof he was a piece of shit OP? You see, despite all the efforts MRAs still operate in a female-primacy frame
/r/MensRights25/02/23 09:32 AM
1

Stop the cap. That's methodologically WRONG, you're not a rapee if you say so on a survey, you only are if the rapist gets convicted by a jury of peers after evaluating the evidence during a fair trial. Women have a propensity to enjoy the catharsis of indignation at the expenses of men as the me too experience taught us. Most of the claims were BS, everyone was a self appointed victim, except they weren't and who would turn down free attention and money? No one! so an innocent would pay. I know…
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:48 AM
4

In India it's already a thing. Too bad it doesn't apply to people who wear makeup and hide their notch count
/r/MensRights21/02/23 07:28 AM
1

💉
/r/MensRights20/02/23 07:22 PM
2

1) "are found or suspected to be false" is entirely dependent on the rules of the game. And we all know that rules are designed to grant the maximum level of protection to women while simultaneously removing legal protection to men like "innocent until proven guilty". If Trigglypuff claimed she was raped by Leonardo DiCaprio no sane officer would send her back saying she's talking shit - he might think it - but no one would end his career by calling out a manifestly false accusation. 2) "Only 1/…
/r/MensRights20/02/23 06:40 PM
2

She should pay not the lover, he didn't breach any contact
/r/MensRights20/02/23 06:22 PM
6

You should have told her you got a 2-million raise, banged her and dumped her lol
/r/MensRights20/02/23 06:15 PM
11

There you go minority report IRL
/r/MensRights20/02/23 06:13 PM
-5

What a fucking simp, he deserved every bit of it
/r/MensRights20/02/23 06:04 PM
9

Harshly punish women who appeal the authorities without having a valid reason to do so.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 05:54 PM
1

Only provided they're telling the truth. You're assuming that 1) I'm in it for the fun 2) she's not 3) I'm more likely to bail 4) she gets hurt or something. Statistically, it's women who are way more prone to ghost, not call, disappear and have short term flings. Not to mention I always tell the truth (and get punished for it many times) while they hide other prospects, fuck buddies, friends they use for benefits etc. I do that to protect my reputation. But the main topic is a woman only group …
/r/MensRights15/02/23 11:35 AM
1

Ok so draft women.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 11:32 AM
1

This is tantamount to saying MGTOW 'punish' women. No, they don't they make a choice and want equal treatment, this 'you resent women' rhetoric is based in binary extremes. Once you take into account that things can have more than 2 options you'll focus more on men's rights rather than women's benefits. Nobody here hates women, we just want equal treatment. I wouldn't go down the responsibility path, since women aren't famous for undertaking much responsibility, the old order social contract had…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:54 PM
1

Fair enough, but many times women asked me to come inside just to disappear after a while
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:50 PM
1

That's BS once you remove their fragile egos. I might be 'whoring around' with single mothers, uggos, ghosters, sluts, entitled, shitty-to-be-around women but then ask another one for a baby or a family (and I have). That's entirely up to me, the equivalent of what you said is guys warning other guys about women going for dinner and not putting out. You can't do that.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:49 PM
9

Twenty years ago, when I saved a guy who was trying to commit suicide. Men protecting others is a an imposition, it's a social expectation for me to be sacrificeable, for who? For women. In WWI women would put a white feather in your blouse if you were a deserter. In most of human history men would be shot dead if they are unwilling to sacrifice themselves in a war they did not choose for a payoff that will not benefit them. The same applies in every dangerous situation. Men are expected to sacr…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 11:49 AM
8

Same here it was on Badoo, I asked my gfs to research it but they came back empty-handed, it must be some exclusive Telegram or Facebook group. I asked my gfs to make a search but they came back empty-handed, the funny thing is that I tell everyone from the start that I want to date non exclusively (and they know each other), they'll accept because they want some D then get bitter and dox you with fake stories.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:57 AM
15

Hahaha all that matters is social approval guys! So go and burn alive in a building that's on fire cause you'll get a nice story out of it, it will be amazing! Whereas keeping your ass in a safe environment chopping the veggies while is world is freely handed to you is such a disempowering thing! Tl;Dr: losing your life in one of those traditionally male roles is fun cause society approves, being safe is not because I wanna feel important without putting the work
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:48 AM
3

Lol my notch count is 500+ I can disclose it since nobody knows me online, I'm yet to meet someone who called me names whose score is higher than mine. We definitely need a shaming word like that and start using it on handicapped/obese/extremely ugly women and the normalise it, it should be clear by now that you don't reach anything by playing nice.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:43 AM
0

Ok that's a given, women are dream killers. But the original point was that women cheating is normalised because women are winning, so will be cuckoldry, fake accusations, poly, etc Women by and large cannot be trusted to foster equality, they will always abuse a democracy for their own benefit, not to build a functioning society
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:40 AM
8

I was put in one such groups in Poland, but don't know which (I was told by women on dating apps). Do you know the names of a few of those groups?
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:29 AM
11

Bro' you clearly understand very little about strategy and overestimated their mettle. They're INCAPABLE of negotiating, they can't be reasoned with and are very very low IQ beings
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:28 AM
19

If you put a "no Jews allowed" sign in your shop you righteously go to jail. Therefore, women-only group should be deleted and their members prosecuted. This being said it's even worse than that, women tens to overestimate men's commitment (and men do women's sexual interest). Therefore, it might be full of delusional women thinking it's "their man" when in reality the guy is just exploring his options.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:25 AM
0

What does it have to do with the fact the in this era women are winning the war between the sexes? I don't understand
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:22 AM
0

The feminine imperative
/r/MensRights12/02/23 07:26 PM
0

Because they're winning.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 04:16 PM
3

Everything that's said about me belongs to me. People should have a right to control what it is said about them and be given the chance of a fair rebuttal. Corporations don't have the right to make exclusive secret groups, if I have a shop and post a "no Jews allowed" sign I'd be jailed. Likewise, "women only" groups should be dismantled and people be sentenced for discrimination. Society fought hard to remove aggressive behaviour from men, it's about time we remove gossiping from women. Equalit…
/r/MensRights07/02/23 06:40 PM
3

These groups should be removed, they're violence against men.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:36 PM
-8

Therapy for men is called Machiavellianism and studying the dark triad. A the rest is bullshit that doesn't work and the reason is simple: nobody gives a shit about you. You had a traumatising life? Well society doesn't care and you won't score any victimhood points, the only thing you can do is help yourself and play the game in the way it is played rather than how you wish to play it.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 12:47 PM
-1

Adopt? Lol. Self-cuckoldry
/r/MensRights03/02/23 09:03 PM
2

Here we go again with the "punishment" rhetoric. That's a very easy to spot tactic the feminine imperative has been using to shame men into taking action. If I were to use some sophistry just to win a debate I'd point out that women almost never help men and that would be the end of it, but I'd like men to have another point of view and then form their own opinion on the saviour schema. Omg women are punishing men by not putting out!!! Sounds bad? Yes, and they are choosing. Omg employers aren't…
/r/MensRights30/01/23 12:29 PM
2

It can't happen. There's a very well studied phenomenon called "the bystander effect"
/r/MensRights30/01/23 12:06 PM
2

Men should NOT be bound to defending women upon their request or women should be bound to put out at our behest. Don't like it? Well neither do I, so we should settle for the "we don't owe each other shit" trope. What happened to two things: a) "my body, my choice" and b) equality? The rabid journalist who went after the man asking why he didn't intervene did not intervene herself. I though women could do anything a man can only on high heels. I'm not gonna risk to make my genetic lineage go ext…
/r/MensRights30/01/23 10:59 AM
-1

Mine gave me a blowjob when I told her I broke my laptop after losing at Assassin's Creed. It's all about how you make them enter your frame.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 07:36 AM
1

Any war in the history of mankind was fought because of hypergamy. Besides, when women were in leadership roles war did happen.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 02:05 AM
2

I suppose you already know who I am
/r/MensRights28/01/23 11:45 PM
5

Can you share the links?
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:38 AM
2

At least they're not dumb enough to hide their secret room under a fake floor, Alex.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:36 AM
2

Ok I've got a solution for you, let's swap the genders you go fight and we'll give BJs in the nursery lol
/r/MensRights28/01/23 12:32 AM
1

MGTOW?
/r/MensRights27/01/23 07:37 AM
1

Name and shame.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 07:30 AM
1

I think the debate about whether women lie or a simply solipsistic ends here with the war approaching. Women DO understand Paretian logics very well, when it suits them, then conveniently toss them aside and use social conversations (read manipulation tactics) when it suits them. Equality is equality, and it comes with rights and responsibilities, get ready for a tsunami of tears and dead hamsters along the way. This is a great step in the right direction. Even though no conscription would be be…
/r/MensRights27/01/23 07:17 AM
5

So which activities did you promote in order for men to have the same rights women enjoy while simultaneously having no responsibility?
/r/MensRights27/01/23 07:09 AM
2

It shouldn't be mandatory for anyone. Even in times of war. Me I don't give a fuck about my country or protecting people who don't belon in my lineage.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 07:08 AM
6

If you're a man and you're dating over 40 then you're doing it wrong man. Sorry, not sorry. Unless you're fishing for a 3rd, 4tg or 5th plate it's not in your best interest to do it.
/r/MensRights23/01/23 02:17 AM
1

Stop! NEVER act like the father or you're screwed
/r/MensRights22/01/23 06:19 PM
7

Did you win the " holier than thou" award? In case you don't know how power works there's nothing contradictory between the two, in fact I don't think like that, I act like that. Why? Because if your opponent is a low-IQ amass of bullshit and fat we will NOT win by being more virtuous, you win by outdoing your opponent. You become who you fight against for a reason, if your enemy stoops low, you need to stoop lower in order to attain victory. Guess who's got that "if you're a friend then you're …
/r/MensRights22/01/23 05:44 PM
11

Toxic masculinity is the pretext to bash and attack men under the pretence that it is to restore the equilibrium. The ingredients are propaganda, binary thinking, bulverism and the like. Once you successfully turn people into stupids who think in binary extremes and use identity politics it's very easy to attack someone's biology and natural biological behaviour by portraying it as "toxic", they come out clean and get away with anything. We never signed up for this, it's about time we counter it…
/r/MensRights22/01/23 04:08 PM
1

Yes, it is still evil. Riding crimes to intentions is the biggest lie our society's have developed, for evil can perpetuate itself under the guide of 'justice'. Doesn't matter if you're brainwashed, if you can't tell right from wrong you're faulty, and should be put in the position not to harm other people. Natural law is a thing, sane people can tell right from wrong, if you can't sane people should put you in a place where you can't harm others.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 07:48 AM
2

I haven't seen a level of hatred this big in a text since Hitler's Mein Kampft. For anyone who still has doubts feminism has always been about maximising hyoergamy, and hyoergamy is about making less attractive and poor men go extinct. It's obvious from her writings.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 07:43 AM
5

The red pill is ultimately about turning off the empathy spigot as a response to feminism indoctrinating women to do the same with regards to men and children. You'd be amazed by how handsomely lose-lose pays off in comparison to lose-win, sure win-win would be better but if you render the vast majority of a sex incapable of negotiating then that's what happens.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 11:03 PM
1

TikTok is China's way to weaken the west
/r/MensRights12/01/23 07:28 AM
1

Excuse me, what's your notch count?
/r/ExRedPill10/01/23 08:13 AM
2

No bro', sorry to shatter your worldview but it takes 2 to have sex, it only takes 1 to have a child lol.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 07:14 AM
1

If you have intent to harm but end up killing it's still murder, besides it's very easy to prove that a bowling ball is lethal so any sane person using it either knew or should have known it could cause a kill. Keep defending hyperagency.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 03:56 PM
8

Google for example
/r/MensRights09/01/23 09:21 AM
10

You sexist pig! Do you know how hard it is to take off a bra? /S
/r/MensRights09/01/23 09:19 AM
11

Women overestimate what they do/go through while simultaneously minimising men's efforts. This is like yeah you've worked 2 jobs for 20 years but I was pregnant for 9 months and couldn't lace my shoes! Women most affected kinda thing.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 09:17 AM
4

If you don't like this sub, have you ever considered making a r/betacucks sub? It fits your mentality and you could feel at home.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 07:34 AM
4

No, if she punches you, you punch back. Fair is fair. A slap for a punch is NOT fair.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 07:33 AM
7

Ferraris are physically faster than Ladas. Running a pedestrian over with a Lada though, might still lead to his death. I hereby rest my case.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 07:31 AM
3

Smashing a bowling ball on someone's head is not intentional?
/r/MensRights09/01/23 07:30 AM
1

I've never lied, never lovebombed, never promised relationships or kids to women I wasn't sure to have them with. Can't be reproached anything.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 06:15 PM
3

The belong in a jail. We should campaign to make it illegal, even to have private social media groups
/r/MensRights08/01/23 06:14 PM
4

I disagree with the last point. My mother was raised by a very strong alpha figure. Always prioritised me over the sisterhood.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 12:54 AM
8

Wait a min! Aren't they strong and independent in Russia? Can't defend themselves? Strange 🤔
/r/MensRights03/01/23 08:38 PM
10

Crabs in a bucket the female way?
/r/MensRights03/01/23 08:36 PM
8

Alpha fucks, but Rambo humps 💪🏻 My boy
/r/MensRights03/01/23 08:34 PM
1

No they won't. Neoclassical economic models are founded in the assumption that operators are RATIONAL. Hypergamy isn't rational, you're not gonna teach them anything. They will simply ignore you and bang Chad instead. I hereby rest my case.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 05:02 PM
1

Facts my boy
/r/MensRights02/01/23 10:44 PM
2

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nationalpost.com/news/canada/no-home-or-kids-together-but-couple-still-spouses-appeal-court-rules/wcm/90a5dbfd-f0f9-4690-8525-e5e3205f50a6/amp/ There you go mate
/r/MensRights02/01/23 06:16 PM
7

Because it's their game. It's deception, as usual. "Trust" is a container word, it may mean whatever, if a thing is very important to a partner but doesn't take anything away from the other it should be done, it's Paretian logic. If she doesn't do it, she doesn't love him enough to give him security.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 05:07 PM
4

Fair enough, so paper abortion AND women paying child support should a man have custody of a baby he made with another woman within the marriage/cohabitation. Equality.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 05:04 PM
6

You didn't understand because you need to hone your comprehension skills and stop reasoning in binary extremes. Where did I say it's ok for men to cheat and not for women? If we take into consideration the family's point of view, however, if a woman cheats AND as a result of it a pregnancy takes place, she brings an unwanted kid in the family unless if we consider both people to be worthy of respect. If the men does then she's not forced to take care of another woman's baby, and that would drive…
/r/MensRights02/01/23 12:34 PM
7

False equivalence. First of all we don't know whether he cheated. If he did it's not excusable but it's not the same either. We should have laws that let cucked men have babies outside the marriage, also thanks to the artificial womb in the future, then force to woman to take care of another woman's children. Let's see how you like equality.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 12:19 PM
3

Respect for you bro! If you maximise happiness that way I wish you well. It's not a viable option for me, my parents loved me a lot and I'm one of the few who grew up in a functional family. I don't want line to go extinct they've been all good to me, so a vasectomy is off the table for me, but it's becoming rarer and rarer to find someone worthy of bonding with.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 12:16 PM
6

I don't follow Tate, nor do I know which things he said that might relate to what I wrote. This is Red Pill 101. Taking care of someone else's child is to men what rape is to women, evolutionarily speaking. With the pragmatic exception though, that in the latter you still get to pass your genes onto the next generation, yet in a sub-par way, whereas in the first case you don't, since no woman would accept your burden. It's all in the numbers, step fathers way outnumber stepmothers and almost no …
/r/MensRights02/01/23 11:32 AM
5

Maybe the child isn't his? Did you even read the article Mr LocalSimp?
/r/MensRights02/01/23 10:42 AM
42

The Matrix is very real gents. The top 1 priority for men's rights should be the removal of responsibility. All the rest is secondary. At what point does it become cloaked slavery? I think we're well beyond that
/r/MensRights02/01/23 08:55 AM
2

Before they take your driving licence aways OP, that is
/r/MensRights01/01/23 11:27 PM
26

You can't. They will find new ways of screwing men over, most of them will be absolutely abusive and men cannot claim they acted in accordance with the laws and regulations of the time when they made their choices, the State will always be incentivised to use presentism and rewrite the laws accordingly. The cold truth is society cannot function without men, and the biggest chuck of the labour in our evolution was done by men, you can't have a society unless you bait men into caring about their f…
/r/MensRights01/01/23 11:23 PM
1

To be fair it would depend on the number, but it's just a theory
/r/MensRights01/01/23 11:07 PM
1

By and large means by and large. Please don't give me the fallacy of individuation. As an example most women would feel relieved if they introduced, say, easier access to abortion in Saudia Arabia even if they would never benefit from something like that since they live in a different country. It doesn't matter what experiences I had, the sisterhood is always above anything else.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 05:57 PM
1

By and large it's what you see women doing. Or at the very least they're sympathetic to this kind of things.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 01:18 PM
6

We should do the same and rate women according to metrics like: golddiggerism, time to sex, number and frequency of "out of proportion" shit tests, flakiness and see how they react.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 02:32 PM
1

Sure, I'm European lol. But ideologies are like Risiko, they want to colonise the entire world. That's why women celebrate if a woman removes the hijab in, say, Saudi Arabia. It's a victory for the sisterhood. We don't do that, we can only flee once the situation goes downhill
/r/MensRights31/12/22 12:35 PM
-1

Sure and feminism is about women's rights, and the golden rule works and if you work hard you'll get promoted 😅
/r/MensRights30/12/22 12:00 AM
8

Because liberals aren't liberal
/r/MensRights29/12/22 07:02 PM
3

This. You should protect yourself more OP.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 07:01 PM
6

It's not self hatred, it's their game. My friend is fat, very fat, so now he just scored a helluva relationship that's gonna most likely make everyone go green of eny: a fat single mother he just knocked up, so whenever women bring up the subject of abortion he sides with them, it's his opinion he's entitled to it, but then considers men's sexuality as "just a jizz of cum" instead of a way to reach love and intimacy. We're not worthy of respect or capable of feelings apparently. Whereas, women's…
/r/MensRights29/12/22 02:31 PM
1

I disagree with not calling them out for standing you/ghosting, I've had countless lays by passive-aggressively calling them out but you need to be strong on dark-triad game. Something like "Ok no problem if you didn't show up. But you wronged me, so if you want there to ever be a date next time you're coming" (don't say where), you'll be amazed how many times this works. Also remember that when you bruise someone's ego more often than not that stings so bad that they need you... That's right th…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/22 10:40 AM
1

Bro it's a law of power, it's not about you, it's about them. If people see you hanging out with the 'wrong' people they'll punish you hard. It sucks, but it's true
/r/MensRights14/12/22 08:59 PM
3

As harsh as it may sound don't bring him a cookie, avoid the unfortunate and the unhappy, if you wanna do so, do it when nobody is watching you.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 03:59 PM
30

Lmao "I wanna become a man to have it easier" "Oh my god I'm short and people don't love me no more, who would have thought it would be this way"
/r/MensRights14/12/22 08:11 AM
3

So it's ok to yell when someone doesn't follow through on a promise. I'll remember this when I deal with women. Thanks for the tip random site.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 07:53 AM
3

We should start reporting them to the app (Badoo, Tinder etc) for 'mental abuse', after all it wouldn't be a lie, it's just a container word that may mean whatever it is you want it to mean and you might arbitrarily decide that "batshit crazy behaviour" on her part crossed the line. Women do it all the time with labels like "creepy" or when you "made them feel uncomfortable/scared" and in the vast majority of the cases it's just misinterpretation on her part mixed with lack of interest OR it's h…
/r/MensRights11/12/22 07:45 AM
1

Women discriminate against promiscuous men at similar rates.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 10:20 PM
19

They should also prove the causal nexus between being on a sub/reading a book/listening to a podcast etc and sharing the group's opinions. These lesser intellects can only reason according to in-group mentality, but the proof that just because a man is on X then he believes Y has never been found.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 09:23 AM
-1

You talking about dick bro?
/r/MensRights09/12/22 10:26 PM
1

Also because by getting swollen you'd make an end-run around the hypergamous filter, women don't want to be impregnated by gym goers only to later find out they were not the guy she'd imagined
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:58 PM
1

I would... Oh wait you expressly said no illegal advice... I would hug you then, heal yourself up OP and change country.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 04:07 PM
12

She starts to jack you off, you tell her you wanna sleep, she tries again 100 times, you keep saying it, you roll over to the other side, she gets annoying, you tell Hel you don't want and would rather sleep, she says "but I want to", you reply "I don't care, I just wanna sleep", she guilt-trips you, you don't take the bait, she insists, you tell her to stop, she gets on top and puts it in.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 10:59 AM
27

Every time I got raped I had an erection. That's factually untrue.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 10:04 PM
13

No that's wrong, but to make things fair we shouldn't force men to pay alimony.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 10:03 PM
1

Or you could strategise and win. Don't teach men how to lose. If you can't make the other person be honest, the least you can do is not send them to the slaughter
/r/MensRights02/12/22 10:02 PM
1

The vast majority of people are straight
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:48 PM
1

They can't. Seduction doesn't work if you're upfront
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:44 PM
1

Same as she would be a parasitic gold digger if she went on dates with 0 intentions to have sex. Right?
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:43 PM
2

So a woman should tell men she's not sexually interested in that she isn't BEFORE they take her on a date/dinner out/trip etc? How would you make it work? How would you make women be 100% upfront with the sexual expectations as much as you want men to be upfront with the commitment ones?
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:41 PM
3

The problem is the other partner won't be honest about divorce, and soon enough it will come.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:25 PM
1

Yes but most of the times said someone promised things, so it's a fraud. Except it can't be framed as such since sex is in the equation and people fought to have it removed from the list of duties.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:22 PM
1

No, it's too late
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:12 PM
5

The LGBT community campaigned to "drop the B"
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:12 PM
7

STFU you cuck
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:43 PM
13

Artificial womb is the way
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:40 PM
2

Answer "try to hit me and we'll find out". Sure AF she won't.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 06:47 AM
15

Ok they're making that choice. But I remember feminism advocating for punishing sex between a superior and an employee due to the power differential between the two. The employee was supposed not to have a choice since refusing would mean - in this totally unproven assumption - that she would lose her job. Likewise, the beta simp here has way more testosterone and horniness that the gold-digger and in any relationship the one with less sexual urges pulls the strings for personal gain, provided i…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:04 AM
11

Next time you're confronted with the choice of paying for a random tinderella's dinner, just think about how you behaved last time a hobo asked you for some handouts. Then ask yourself the question whether you think you're sexist. Then choose.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:00 AM
1

Maybe we should start
/r/MensRights16/09/22 10:00 PM
6

Exactly
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:59 PM
24

It always happens in the workplace any random ho will gaslight your superiors into taking action against you for things you haven't done and they always end up believing her. The trick is to never have obligations so that if you are kicked from a place you can move on. That's simple. You don't have any other power and you belong to the discriminated gender. Sorry.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:53 PM
5

I'm anhedonic, no reason to be. Have a lot of women, a lot of friends, I don't work hard instead I play video games, I don't have any financial obligations of any kind. Yet I can't feel anything during sex. Why? Circumcision.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 12:50 PM
1

Society doesn't care about what's right and what's wrong, it only cares about finding a man to make him pay. His friend was gigasimp for paying for someone else's date lol.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 11:11 PM
6

Disengage. Never contact her again unless she proves the baby is yours. Never send them any money. Never be in involved in the kid's life. Never behave "like the father". All these things will be used against you if you stay. And you run the risk of raising someone else's child. Change State. Your intentions are noble, you want to be a father PROVIDED you are his father. There's nothing you can do to force her, so think of protecting yourself. If she doesn't want a DNA test odds are you're not t…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 10:47 PM
3

Equality is entirely optional. But at no point does a State have the right to dispose of men's lives and bodies AND prevent men from excersise their sacrosanct self interest as their primary motivator fostering this holistic bs culture. What I'm trying to express here is that there is a difference between the (indiscriminate) use of a right and said right itself. Think for a moment that you are in need of a transplant or you'll die. Society should be in favour of allowing it, but if you butcher …
/r/MensRights12/09/22 07:49 PM
3

Keep up with the hard work bro 💪🏻 If you're doing it for yourself then it's amazing, it's even more so if you find interests, hobbies and activities that you genuinely enjoy. Many boy are misled into believing that they should do X,Y,Z to get the girl. Society unabashedly lies to them and they end up being alone, resentful and miserable. It's our moral duty to at least provide a counter point. Monk mode should be done responsibly, if a guy goes all in then he's up for a bad surprise at the end o…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 07:33 PM
2

No it doesn't. It's the ultimate form of simping actually. Ok first thing first there is no such thing as "our women" but a society is highly dependent on gender ratios. In your scenario you die so that some other dude will bang the women fleeing your country. I know because I'm banging countless Ukrainian women who fled the war, one of them they day after she crossed the border. So you lose your life, or get maimed or lose every shred of humanity you have in you and your outstanding contributio…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 06:02 PM
2

Lol ok, I apologise. But men are constantly sent to the slaughter here. We need to develop a bit of that in-group herd mentality women have to survive combined with a little betashaming and brigading against white knights. Only that way would we be able to turn things around.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 05:40 PM
2

I've already accomplished all my goals. Own 2 apartments, no debt, my job pays well, I don't work much if at all etc etc. The thing is not that men should improve. The thing is that men should stop simping for a gold-digger who would never accept ANYTHING he does no matter how big. There's an asymmetry here. If she is nice, never neglects you, is sexually aroused by you and never turns off the sex spigot then you should reciprocate and have a career, buy a house and sponsor her sorry ass while s…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 05:38 PM
2

Good luck removing hybristiphilia and adoration for the dark triad out of women's minds. The thing everybody gets backwards is you have to alter female behaviour to alter the male one, never the other way around.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 04:15 PM
1

Just because you made it doesn't mean the message you're sending isn't dangerous for young men to follow. Your skills got you to where you are now, more kudos to you, but if a young impressionable guy reads that he would quadruple down on the beta provider role and may or may not have the opportunity to steer the course of his life after he inevitably gets zeroed out.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 04:09 PM
3

You should find a job that pays you enough to provide for the family while simultaneously being at home, learn to delegate the work to others. Become a manager, yes it is sociopathic but it will help you. If you work hard, at some point down the line she will accuse you of 'never being (t)here' and divorce you since she's not haaapy. Don't do that. Stay at home, play with the kids, don't work long hours and have some me time under the pretence you're working. Never provide for someone your genet…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 01:25 PM
-5

Fuck this bullshit. You should be ashamed. Pick up a job that gives you a lot of free time, she won't appreciate whatever you do so it's stupid to simply play by her rules. Buy a house before marriage, rent it to your company and go live somewhere else with your family. Have standards. If she won't meet them just walk away. NEVER undertake more responsibilities and be the primary carer for your children.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 01:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter