TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CoffersWorthington Archive

View 6 posts and 147 comments by CoffersWorthington on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I don't have much tolerance for pseudo-science anti-vax conspiracy types, but if spiritual practices can be sufficiently decoupled from that then it's tolerable. My partner has slight tendencies in this direction but it presents mostly as like, wanting to spend time outside and forage mushrooms. She's not trying to shove anything totally nonsensical at me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/21 12:02 AM
19

What a sweetly naive question.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/21 11:57 PM
1

Yep. $50k of student debt for an animation degree that she doesn't use. Really banking on that student loan forgiveness in case we have a kid together and have to get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/21 07:03 PM
2

This isn't really a sex/gender issue so much as frugality and economics. I think Mr. Money Mustache is a good voice where that is concerned. https://www.mrmoneymustache.com/2011/05/26/what-is-the-real-cost-of-raising-children/
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 06:05 PM
1

I think Rollo Tomassi said that the most stable relationships are formed by a 2-3 point differential (men dating down). That's true in my experience, in finding good long-term stable relationships that aren't crazy high-maintenance. I just hit 30 and I get that daily juice with minimal squeeze. My current partner is fairly gorgeous but has nothing going on career-wise.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/21 05:59 PM
4

I had a female friend that I would see occasionally for about 2 years. We'd meet up and see a show and have long interesting conversations. We both went through a few relationships, and always stayed proper even if there was some sexual tension. Finally eventually we were both single for a few months. She asked me on a "real" date, and I asked her to be exclusive. Now I am happier than I've ever been with a partner, and hoping she will be the mother of my kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 12:25 PM
-4

Super cringe. Chad doesn't need his life choices validated.
/r/MGTOW04/02/19 03:29 AM
2

It is very sad - indicates a flight from life on some deep level. Hopefully getting older will change their views.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/17 06:16 PM
1

Thanks for doing this, it explains a lot about the interactions I've had on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/17 05:13 PM
1

Agreed, I am more than anything interested in changing my beliefs and issues. Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 08:37 PM
1

Thanks. I am working on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 08:36 PM
1

I'm just now reading your replies. You're right that I enjoy my relationships, but I'm genuinely trying to root out my unconscious beliefs, and my patterns of relating, so that I can relate to women in a new mode.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 08:35 PM
1

I am just now reading this. Thanks for the reply. You painted a hilarious picture of the neckbeards you've dated, and I appreciate the perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 08:31 PM
1

I am
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 09:27 PM
1

After the event I described she was apologizing profusely for a few days. She KNEW she fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 04:53 PM
1

Thanks, this is probably the most insightful reply so far. I spend a lot more time with my SOs. Sex once a week is not enough so I'll tend to see her 3 or 4 days a week.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 04:51 PM
1

What's the difference? This last chick jacked her clit like a teenage boy with a micropenis.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 04:49 PM
1

After fucking her and dealing with her bullshit for 3 months, I just didn't CARE to pass. She still wants to be with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 04:46 PM
1

My first relationship turned into a 3 year marriage. After that experience I think I shy away from girls that I could really fall in love with.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 04:44 PM
1

For example, this last one happened during a road trip. I told her a story about a female friend and mentioned her good looks. She accuses me of being a misogynist/patriarch. I point out that my description was very multidimensional. She cries and says she's just insecure because I'm not affectionate enough. I point out how affectionate I've been. She says my dad was more doting (we were visiting for the weekend). I stewed on this for a few days and just felt 100% done. No more will to please.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 04:41 PM
-2

Goals. I'll aim for this when I'm 30-35 and looking seriously for a heifer to carry my seed to term.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 04:35 PM
1

True, personal improvement is the only answer to all of this. I tend to respond to insecurity by getting surly and shutting her out. I know that's not effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 04:32 PM
1

Would you describe your typical relationship-arc, as I have?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 04:31 PM
1

It's true that the 7-and-unders tend to have the most easy-going personalities. But looks are important enough to me that I'm willing to deal with mental issues. My last relationship was an 8 and definitely one of the crazier ones. But I'm pretty good at dealing with it and giving her what she needs. I just lose the will to please over time. So I'm thinking I need a 9 or 10 so that I actually have the desire to continue dealing with her shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 04:30 PM
1

Fair enough. But I think something like match.com would be a lot more efficient than trolling bars/grocery stores. I know some guys that have met 9's online. (My dad being one of them)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 04:27 PM
1

"At all scales likely to affect me, I know 99% of what it is possible for a human being to know about cosmology." Said every life form ever. I think we should "map the map" sparingly. One's own relation to the world is not very special, so general understanding leads to personal understanding and vice versa. We engage tactically with ideas, make sure we have them all. But we are embodied organisms so our real lifestories are built by living out the ideas through actions. Why would either of us c…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 05:59 AM
1

Ha. Labels are for dorks. I've got a high N count with high quality women, I wouldn't change a thing
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 11:51 PM
2

I work in physics/math so I'm inclined to say my map covers only a small percent of what I would like. In terms of practical day to day living though, I get by just fine...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 11:19 PM
1

I don't really see anyone saying it's 'hard. That's why I feel you're projecting something in your own psyche.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 10:41 PM
3

All I'm saying is the whole attitude of 'I've mapped everything there is to know' is insufferable and intellectually dishonest. This comes from a militant generalist and obsessive consumer of information
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 10:19 PM
2

My point is it doesn't really matter what other people are doing. It's not worth thinking about and you should consider WHY you think about it the way you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 09:54 PM
2

What grisly stuff? Ugly people hooking up? Sex is the backbone of society. Get over yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 09:41 PM
4

India is one of the most femicidal countries in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 09:38 PM
3

Math will at least serve the purpose of humbling you. For example, if you don't get the Einstein field equations, then you have not even begun to approach cosmology. You're a kid walking by a temple, thinking you understand everything going on inside just by looking at the outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 09:36 PM
2

That's pretty much how I operate with my girls. But I do enjoy a drink at a dive bar, and I try to fight the part of me that wants to feel superior to other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 09:31 PM
1

You're restating a lot of what you said in your OP. I think you should ask yourself WHY you are fixated on the potential for casual sex. Why are you watching and linking these videos? Why is it worth your time if it holds no appeal?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 09:17 PM
2

You might be onto something with people "overcorrecting" but I doubt the reality is so simple. During my Red-Pill susceptible years (16-20) I feel like I was in denial of sexual difference. Consuming a lot of porn, not wishing to acknowledge the reality and agency of women. A kind of necrophilia in reaction to not being omnipotent. I wanted to completely objectify every woman I knew. Once my sexual period really began (18) I gravitated to women who were eager/willing to mirror and reinforce my o…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 09:14 PM
7

I think you're just indulging yourself with this post. (Too intellectual/introverted? CRIIIIINGE) Finding new women takes work and vigilance. That's why guys are willing to get into short-term relationships. I'd rather be "on the hunt" every 4-6 months than constantly. That comes from another introverted intellectual. Lawl.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 08:50 PM
2

LOL, brilliant idea. Give them all robes and shaved heads, whether they want it or not
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/17 02:59 AM
5

Superiority much?
/r/RedPillWomen24/05/17 01:16 AM
1

There's a proper way of being critical. All you've done is attack my "grasp/mastery", rather than try to clarify, restate, or comment on ANY of the topics at hand. Let's see some critical thinking if it's really that important to you. A good critic SHOWS why a work is illogical or disorganized.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 07:14 AM
1

Fun :-D
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 02:18 AM
1

I'm honored to be official ANYTHING.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 12:21 AM
1

LOL. Just call me Jocasta
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 10:23 PM
1

You can do it!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 10:20 PM
1

Read the comment you just made. Then see category 2: "Those who would subjugate the multiplicity of desire to the twofold law of structure and lack."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 10:13 PM
1

See my post history, I've tried many ways of formulating these ideas. It's true that I'm probably writing to the top quarter of the bell curve.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 08:56 PM
1

I don't, I'll put it on my list.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 08:55 PM
1

Very interesting, I would not have made the connection to J.B. Where should I start with her?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 08:37 PM
1

1) I HAVEN'T mastered the subject. I'm a mathematician. 2) I'm not trying to write a for-dummies book, I'm trying to organize my own ideas and push people outside their comfort zones
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 08:13 PM
1

Lawl. Did you see this thread? https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/6cl40n/who_is_oedipus_and_how_can_you_fight_him/dhvt9m7/ I feel like it's very illustrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 07:37 PM
1

Your comment is interesting but I'm wondering, how does TRP "fight against" the Chad myth?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 07:03 PM
1

This statement is really confusing in context.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 07:01 PM
1

The imperative to press my crème up into every female I see
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 06:30 PM
1

Nah. Your parent comment is more "fluff talk" than anything in my OP. There was no useful discussion in this thread. Oh well indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 06:12 PM
1

If you can point out where I lost you, I'll try again
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 06:00 PM
1

OK. Notice how you were eager to name-drop reaction mechanisms, nobel laureates, masters degrees? That's your oedipal fingerprint. You don't want to face up to the actual content of my post so you made a comment that serves only to shore up your existing ego structures. This stuff applies to EVERYONE. In very precise ways. You just have to be willing to try a little self-awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 04:59 PM
1

The topic here is much more constrained than my other posts: The place of Oedipus in existential/postmodern thought. If you want Precision I don't know what you're doing in this subreddit - stick to engineering.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 04:50 PM
1

Too bad, the 2nd half is juicy
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 04:48 PM
1

Great job
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 04:47 PM
1

I don't know where you're seeing measurements. But understanding ourselves better leads to living more fully.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 04:40 PM
1

What is sots?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 04:39 PM
1

You didn't get the gist of it? Though you're hardly a layman so I don't think the test would apply ;-) Also, how readable would formal logic be?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 04:39 PM
2

"There but for a modicum of self-awareness go I"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 04:35 PM
1

Ok. So OP should keep his optimism in check. He's asking a good question though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 06:11 AM
2

Going for a short stroll can be huge if you're a 500-pound man.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 05:30 AM
4

Thanks for the honesty. If I knew how to write it in a more approachable way I would. Badiou (a LIVE Frenchman) said mathematics = ontology. What I'm wrestling with is the ontology of desire. A schema for micropolitics. What is the topology of the space in which it occurs? What dynamical entities are at play? What is the interaction between individual and group thought? It's all very mathematical to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 05:29 AM
1

It's all relative. To a virgin it could be huge.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 05:20 AM
2

These places wear out their usefulness when you see nothing but the same themes repeating. That's when you seek challenges elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 05:19 AM
2

There's always a bigger Chad brah
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 05:17 AM
1

Thanks for the link and the reply. I haven't read any Reich but I got his influence early in my life thru Robert Anton Wilson.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 04:40 AM
1

Yeah, yeah, thanks for commenting
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 04:37 AM
3

I didn't think anyone could disagree with my diagnosis of the kid, hahaha.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 02:18 AM
1

I just edited my OP. I'm not using the strict Freudian sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 02:13 AM
1

Recommended reading http://www.philosophicaleggs.com/?p=807
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 02:01 AM
1

I clarified a bit, check out my link http://www.philosophicaleggs.com/?p=807
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/17 02:01 AM
1

LOL! The irony of you using the word "inflammatory". I said exactly what I meant to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 11:30 PM
1

What does non-feminist blue pill mean? I haven't really seen a definition of BP but I assumed it's synonymous with feminism...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 11:02 PM
1

Find an ofuscatory segment. Try to get the gist of what I'm saying. Try to find a better way to formulate it. That's how this works.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 03:58 AM
1

"This is how it should be done: Lodge yourself on a stratum, experiment with the opportunities it offers, find an advantageous place on it, find potential movements of deterritorialization, possible lines of flight, experience them, produce flow conjunctions here and there, try out continuums of intensities segment by segment, have a small plot of new land at all times. It is through a meticulous relation with the strata that one succeeds in freeing lines of flight, causing conjugated flows to p…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 03:29 AM
2

Halp
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 03:21 AM
1

Wrong thing, I'm talking about a Korean movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/17 04:32 PM
9

So we just need to reach universal agreement on 1) laws, 2) our political selves, and 3) an ethical system. Brilliant.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/17 02:40 AM
8

I believe the categorizers are making the equation: "Red pill" = Men overcoding ideas and rationalizing their frustrations.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 06:36 AM
4

I don't know what kind of discussions you're having. But like I said, unless you give an example I'm guessing these "women critics" made overly categorical judgments that betrayed a certain degree of douchiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 06:29 AM
2

Read: "Someone called me a Redpiller and it's not fair, even though I probably fit right into the typical demographic"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 06:23 AM
7

Of course it's not a rule, but it makes for more useful discussions. As it stands you leave no room for increasing your own understanding (even though you posted the thread as a question)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 06:21 AM
8

It's probably because when someone makes categorical statements about an entire group of people, it reflects more on their own life experience and insecurities than on the actual group. Without any examples this post just seems like a whine.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 06:10 AM
1

Are you both men? I am curious if girls will find the movie as intense and enjoyable - given that it ISN'T their gaze which is being deconstructed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/17 05:56 AM
1

I like to horrify myself into oblivion. My best trip movie prior to this was "Irreversible"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 10:52 PM
1

I mean, I LOVED the movie. I could say it made me ready to "double down" on plurality over dichotomy. I've just got this lasting unease about the whole thing...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 10:26 PM
1

Definitely. Take a bunch of LSD first.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 09:55 PM
1

That's what I mean - there is no element of healthy male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 09:55 PM
2

Thanks for the reply! I agree. I really wanted to eat some pussy after watching it. I think my main issue is how feminine sexuality is framed within this nightmarish vilification of the masculine. The one scene of intimacy with the husband ends short with him collapsing drunk. Angels among lechers - just seems too black-and-white.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 09:53 PM
2

Yes. Besides the obvious lead relationship. Lots of homoeroticism among the men. Group observations of kink-theatre. (SPOILER ALERT) The torture and castration at the end was VERY sexually charged (Overtly: as that scene began, and the uncle was reading the girl's letter in her voice, with his robe draped open, it seems to suggest the girls' intimacy is transposed to violence between the men.) All the male figures are COMPLETELY impotent. Even the husband doesn't get to consummate his marriage. …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 09:46 PM
1

Smurf's comment piqued my interest, if you have anything to say about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 09:14 PM
2

Innocence/intimacy, betrayal/insanity, death/fetishism
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 08:34 PM
2

It's funny that my analysis was relevant to both. Check out the movie sometime, it's on Amazon
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 07:40 PM
1

Korean movie
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 07:28 PM
2

Interesting. Maybe I'll read it, though I prefer non-fiction. Is that a period-specific thing? Does the criminalization of femininity have social relevance today?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 07:13 PM
1

You see word salad because you are repressing awareness of your own ego weakness.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 06:49 PM
3

See? Disjoint thought realms. We can only talk past each other. I've got a message from the action man. "I'm happy, hope you're happy too. I've loved all I've needed, love - sordid details following"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 06:46 PM
3

But it's too late, I already read it! I've done some writing here, see my post "Abstract Gender Dynamics", you'll see how disjoint our thoughts are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 06:39 PM
5

I'm amused at the impotence of your ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 06:15 PM
6

Read: "I really really want to be a patriarch"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 06:06 PM
1

See the Jungian take: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puer_aeternus
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 05:55 PM
1

When you're only taking in information that confirms your preconceptions, you need to branch out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 03:46 PM
4

LOL, you are pathetic. Your shit personality is probably why women don't want anything to do with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 03:33 PM
2

I will try not to be threatened by my daughter's sexual autonomy. Date who you want. I would definitely question her judgment on 2 and 5. 3 and 4 seem less likely to come up but would also surely lead to questioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 05:36 AM
2

Overcoded definitions. But mostly a lot of ego stroking. The quotes reflect their different attitudes toward relationships. I'd wager the person who wrote #1 tends to value commitment more (exclusion of competition) and isn't well-liked by males. Person #3 shows the more sociopathic utilitarian bent that makes the skeevy side of RP; and isn't well liked by females. Questions 1-2: Realize AF/BF is a false dichotomy used when rationalizing the sheer complexity and the god-damned contingency of att…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 05:21 AM
1

Yum
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 08:48 PM
1

How good do YOU look, Scarlet?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 08:06 PM
8

r/baltimore 2011: http://i.imgur.com/vIjBL.jpg (NSFW)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/17 10:08 PM
1

I'm trying to decide whether I should be a NoFap person (and where to source my willpower), or just continue being hedonistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 05:24 PM
1

I want to find an analytical viewpoint for thinking of porn / masturbation. IE... artificial limitlessness. Self-directedness. It's a struggle of mine. Any thoughts?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 05:11 PM
4

Yeah because politicians/businessmen are totally known for not being assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 07:13 AM
1

Easy, he's a politician / business bro. That's prime redpill material.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 07:12 AM
3

Here are the main differences: Wearing a ring on your finger Referring to each other as husband/wife
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/17 07:39 PM
1

LMAO. Bro, I bet Deleuze got TONS of pussy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/17 07:20 PM
1

I reread this thread of discussion and I'm still consternated, especially by this division between communication and assertiveness. Now you're talking about physical assertiveness. I would definitely lump that all together under "ecstasy" brah. The seductive process of a good conversation or dance. You are overly focused on taking the terms literally, taking everything at its face value, instead of as a thought experiment. That's what I meant when I said I appreciate the thought in your replies …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/17 05:26 AM
1

Any combativeness that manifests in our conversation is demonstrative of our shared ego weakness. You should read some Guntrip, he's very approachable. https://www.amazon.com/Schizoid-Phenomena-Relations-Maresfield-Library/dp/1855750325
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/17 05:15 AM
1

Most of my reading has come from the ones I mentioned in my post: Deleuze, Lacan, Irigaray, Kristeva (speaking of Dostoevsky). I'm just getting into Zizek and find that he's very influenced by Lacan? My formal training is in physics&math so this is just hobby. I don't have an answer for the Butler/Naussbaum question. If you have some favorite books to recommend I'll throw em on my kindle!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/17 02:17 AM
1

Take your time, it took me a week or 2 to put my post together. This is definitely a weak point in my understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/17 01:50 AM
1

I lied, one last reply based on your flare, maybe the most relevant part of my post for you. Obsessional self-mastery compensates for a fundamentally weak ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/17 12:03 AM
1

At this point I can't tell if you're being deliberately obtuse so I'm going to stop replying.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 11:57 PM
1

When you assert your self, you are taking some element from within and placing it into discourse.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 11:54 PM
1

I appreciate the thought in your replies and I do want to get across what I (via feminist philosophers) am trying to say I would change have a limited ability to place themselves as subjects ina narrative to tend not to speak as subjects within language and see the outside world as non-female to participate in the outside world as non-subjects.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 11:50 PM
1

The 3 words you provided suggest an easy correspondence: Assertiveness = (out of the self) = ecstasy Probing = (into the other) = ejaculation Claiming = (what I'm hard for is mine) = erection The last one sounds like a stretch but think about it: I claim the land and then erect the building.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 11:46 PM
1

The mechanism of language is what I'm talking about since I presupposed that it provides for and limits how we are constituted as subjects.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 11:21 PM
1

The point is that neuter elements default to male.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 11:11 PM
1

This doesn't make sense to me so I'll ask you a question... in what terms does a man narrativize his sexual life, besides the ones I mentioned?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 11:09 PM
1

As I said, Masculine dominates language (in plural or neuter)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 11:01 PM
1

You've given a perfect illustration. Read what you've said: the quote sounds like an incel, or someone who is unable to achieve ecstasy/ejaculation due to the unwillingness of the Other.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 11:00 PM
1

Well, seduction necessarily involves communication. Our interactions are structured by conscious/unconscious linguistic formulations (What we want out of a partner; what we think a partner wants from us; presumptions based on their appearance; beliefs about our own appearance). Just look at the endlessness of perversity/fetishism to see the work of language in sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 09:41 PM
1

Thanks for the blow by blow, this cracked me up. I expanded a bit in my reply to writingtoc. (re: feminine relation to symbolic order)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 09:37 PM
1

Entering the Symbolic order is the first step in forming a coherent social identity. Classical psychonalysis refers to a Master Signifier (the Phallus, the Law of the Father) to which the individual's relationship becomes the basis of sexual difference. This is debatable: maybe the Master Signifier is not a symbolic category of its own but just a reinforcement of the one-sex description of the world, in which for example the clit is "just" a small penis. Less debatable is the fact that the mascu…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 09:35 PM
1

This post is a sort of skeleton that could probably be expanded out to an article or book with more plain language and examples. If there's any part you'd like me to elaborate on I'd be happy to try.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 08:46 PM
1

lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 08:31 PM
1

Lust takes a verbal connotation for humans which is why we differ from creatures. Raccoons don't experience lust in the sense that we do. Your comment isn't really a response to anything in my post.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 08:11 PM
1

Thanks for the clarification. I believe that there's some reactive "Redpill" element in the psyche of every "normal" male which is why I grouped them together. That's a topic requiring a lot more analysis.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 08:04 PM
1

I've told this to several women but haven't heard it from any. I might be abnormal because I like to take some acclimation before sex happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/17 03:03 PM
1

Idk what you're getting at at all bruh, sry
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 05:14 PM
1

Seriously ? Religion is a joke
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 05:00 PM
1

I'm well read in those areas and I always wish I have the heart to go thru with cheating/playing multiple girls. Reluctant serial monogamist.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/17 04:38 AM
1

People already love realdolls.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/17 03:09 PM
2

OP is really deliberately obtuse in his post and his replies. This whole discussion is really pointless and only exists because of OP dichotomizing these two things: "In short, the evidence is clear: clear communication is a far better alternative to amused mastery. It's what the science supports." When they need not be "alternatives" to each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/17 03:08 PM
4

All my relationships have formed without any real effort on my part. In the beginning: Erectile dysfunction as I get a feel for her and come to terms with her sexual past. In the end: Maybe some pettiness and meanness, coming from the fact that I want to fuck other people. I've always been the one to end it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/17 03:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter