| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Looks is all there is in dating?"The gym body indicates that you have discipline, self control and determination" Not necessarily in all or even most aspects of life. Including finances, how you'll raise future children, and how you'll treat your partners. Many lash out, have a short fuse, and spend money like there's no tomorrow. But I agree that it shows they have SOME of what you describe. Which is better than nothing, when it comes to first appearances. | /r/ExRedPill | 28/10/22 08:06 PM |
| 2 | Looks is all there is in dating?Even someone who is successful with business and money. Its not the money or career women are attracted to. It's the drive and skill to MAKE it happen. Of course, if they're stepping and screwing over others in the process...then thats a completely different matter! And that will hurt their desirability. Although, unfortunately, thats also an attribute to some people. But not too many people, I think. Most arent into those who harm others to get ahead in life. Both for moral reasons and they kno… | /r/ExRedPill | 28/10/22 08:01 PM |
| 1 | Looks is all there is in dating?Spot on about preferences. I've known women who are completely unattracted to blonde men. They wouldn't even give peak Brad Pitt a chance lol. Just like how some women aren't into bald or really muscular guys. So, no date for Dwayne Johnson lol. Not that he needs it, but you get my point! | /r/ExRedPill | 28/10/22 07:56 PM |
| 1 | Looks is all there is in dating?Unless you're a successful doctor/lawyer/celebrity/politician, etc...I never understood how you can have "social status". A slightly rich small businessman or IT worker isn't gonna have 'social status'. Or do they mean 'the quality of friends'? Joe Schmoe with a rich daddy, or who went to a good university, can have 'successful friends'. But what does that really say about him as a person and potential partner? Not much, really. In other words, social status is practically non-extent except for … | /r/ExRedPill | 28/10/22 07:54 PM |
| 3 | I was played and cheated on by the “trad” women the red pill claimed were the best women to date." the "Christian" label is about aesthetics and appearances for alot of religious types." Thats especially true for people in certain areas. I.E. small towns and in more traditional suburbs. I think a lot of it has to do with 'fitting in', and so they use that label to fit in. But, in reality, many behave much differently. The reverse is true in more liberal/less traditional areas. You have people say how they're this and that in order to fit in. But, in reality, are actually more traditional an… | /r/ExRedPill | 28/10/22 07:49 PM |
| 2 | I was played and cheated on by the “trad” women the red pill claimed were the best women to date.Honestly, most red pillers these days dont even make an exception for 'trad women'. Sure, they think they're better, but they still think they're largely the same. In the past, it use to just be 'black pillers' who felt that. Now its a large section of self-identifying red pillers. | /r/ExRedPill | 28/10/22 07:44 PM |
| 1 | Is it true that promiscuous males are good because they have to be desirable to get sex?Yeah a lot has changed in the past years. Covid, less trust toward strangers, more entertainment outlets (it seems everyone is a gamer nowadays under 40). Although, ironically enough, 'friends with benefits' ARE more popular nowadays. But, thats with people you can trust...and often play video games with haha. But, 'friends with benefits' is much different than traditional hookups. As the latter is usually with some stranger you just met. Be it from Tinder, a bar or wherever. | /r/ExRedPill | 28/10/22 07:36 PM |
| 3 | Is it true that promiscuous males are good because they have to be desirable to get sex?I think most of them aren't BS'ing, except with perhaps some exaggerations. But, they also dont tell the secret to their success: they're approaching soooo many women, so of course they're gonna get lucky. And they're often settling for women they really don't want. Of course, they dont say all this. | /r/ExRedPill | 28/10/22 07:31 PM |
| 2 | Is it true that promiscuous males are good because they have to be desirable to get sex?Not really. Many are promiscuous due to the numbers game. Its like in that King of the Hill episode where everyone thought Boomhauer was "a lady's man". It turns out, he was 'successful' because he approached sooooo many women lol. Obviously, you've gotta some positive attributes. But, if you approach hundreds of women of course you're gonna get lucky sometimes. | /r/ExRedPill | 28/10/22 07:27 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter