TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Coldbeam Archive

View 2 posts and 417 comments by Coldbeam on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
162

Did she? That looks more like ms paint blacking out to me.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 03:17 AM
17

I think when he said "the boys around her," he was talking about boys her own age.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 01:19 PM
1

European countries are begging their citizens to have children Or bringing in massive amounts of immigrants.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 05:50 PM
-10

I'm just showing it's humorous. I think the double standard is the bad part, not that they are sexualizing attractive men.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 10:11 PM
-11

https://i.imgur.com/vnyoeVa.jpg
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:43 PM
16

And assault
/r/MensRights07/02/18 07:12 AM
3

I think we're getting into semantics here. Whether they leave behind the mentality that having sex with children is ok, or it adapts to no longer be acceptable are the same thing in my mind.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 07:53 PM
6

Sure, and those people are awful.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 07:19 PM
25

If they want to leave that culture behind, and embrace western values I'm fine with them.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 06:52 PM
9

I'm specifically arguing against your comment. The majority understanding or agreeing with the original post is not relevant. However, if we want to talk about that, I believe that a lot of people on this subreddit fall into the trap of "feminists complain when x happens, so we should complain too" When in reality, feminists should not be a group you want to emulate.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 07:01 AM
6

You're making the assumption that feminists speak for most women. They don't.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 06:16 AM
23

US culture in general doesn't care. Uptight feminists (the ones this sub is supposed to be against) are the ones who get mad at people looking sexy.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 06:03 AM
1

I'm not a Marxist but I've at least Marx. You accidentally a word there.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 05:00 AM
2

Could we get a source on that?
/r/MensRights28/10/17 04:58 AM
5

You replied to the wrong comment.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:58 PM
15

Censoring is not the right answer. If someone thinks something stupid, tell them why its stupid, don't just ban them. The whole reason free speech is such an important concept is because we all have stupid ideas, and need to learn from each other.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 06:15 AM
198

Thank you. I see so many people blaming it on balls, when the reality is we have different hip structure.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 06:13 AM
4

This isn't tumblr. "Educate yourself" is not a good answer here.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 07:35 PM
1

I don't think reddit mods are in on anything, but posting names could be considered posting personal information, or witch hunting which would be against site rules, so deleted. (I should make it clear here that I'm not saying anything about the validity of pizzagates claims. I simply haven't done research into it to have an informed opinion.)
/r/MensRights13/02/17 07:31 PM
1

If you said radical scholar I'd think you were talking about someone studying the 90s, but that's just me.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 06:22 AM
28

Why? Sargon's ban was legitimate. He linked porn on there.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:26 PM
3

No, 4 people out of all the people you've met in your life. Not a whole neighborhood.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 06:45 AM
5

Cops didn't find the stereos in your garage. Some random person said you stole their stereo 10 years ago.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 06:24 AM
4

weren't
/r/MensRights16/09/16 02:21 AM
8

He looked and acted slightly guilty or embarrassed Not really, he looked like he was confused by her crazy and wanted to just get away from her.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 02:14 AM
3

I watched more of the video, thinking her explanation and context might make it better. It didn't.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 04:01 AM
9

I think there's a difference in thinking one gender is superior, and outright hating one gender.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 07:36 AM
1

Why are you looking for an argument with someone who is asking a sincere question?
/r/MensRights02/09/16 03:09 PM
3

You two should do a prank video and just confuse the shit outta people by being in two places at once.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 05:22 AM
10

I have never seen a "feminazis"/extreme feminists. english is not my native language Those two might be related. They seem to be much more prevalent in English speaking countries.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 05:10 AM
1

They're just trying to keep those "other guys" out, who aren't as "nice and respectful" as they are.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 01:57 AM
1

I'm just pointing out that you can't put forth two different comparisons like that, without linking them, and expect people to follow your thought process.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:53 PM
1

Fields such as nursing are far easier than being a doctor but yet they pay far more than many male-dominated blue collar occupations. You're comparing two different things here: a blue collar wage to a nurse's, and then the difficulty of a being nurse vs the difficulty of being a doctor
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:17 PM
21

Well there goes that argument. Thank you for looking that up.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 05:23 AM
30

going back years How many years? If there's been abuse for under 5 years, both her allegations and her testimony in 2011 could be true.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 04:44 AM
6

Alimony and child support are two separate things.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 07:13 AM
17

nobody is going to vote against their own best interests. You must be new to American politics.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 01:56 PM
10

but gays make up less than 5% of all men That shouldn't matter in the slightest. Male rape victims, male domestic violence victims, falsely accused, I could go on, they all make up the minority of men, but they all matter. If a feminist were to start a men's abuse shelter, I would say she's supporting a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:29 PM
27

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763413003011 I was skimming so I didn't see anything about women having more neurons. It is very interesting that structurally they are different as well. For example, men tended to have larger volumes in brain regions associated with survival instincts, memory and learning, while women tended to have larger volumes in areas of the brain dealing with language and emotions. Here's an article talking about the paper I liked. http://www.nhs.uk/n…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 07:00 AM
7

They've been taught that male sexuality is gross, weird, creepy, and unwanted, while female sexuality is pure, liberating, and beautiful. Them expressing their sexuality can't be a bad thing, because it is never unwanted, or creepy like it would be coming from a man.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:38 AM
-8

Replace jail with rape and you sound like a freakin tumblrina. I thought mras were supposed to be above the hysteria of feminists.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:34 AM
8

I'd have to disagree. They certainly don't like weak men, but that's not the worst insult they have. Misogynist, creep, rapist, pedophile, all used without restraint, and all worse imo.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 12:14 PM
63

That's where it started. Tumblr took it to mean a male they don't like. Kind of like when they took rape culture which was about prisons and made it about false statistics of college campuses.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 06:15 AM
1

You're doing the same thing feminists do. You take every action you see, and assume the worst intentions. Are all those things hurting men? Absolutely, I'm not arguing that. But their intention is not to hurt, men, it is to help women. They just don't care if men get in the way, because they've dehumanized us to the point where they think we don't need any help in any area.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 09:14 PM
1

You truly believe we live in a matriarchy intent on destroying the very thing it needs to survive? You sound as crazy as the people who say we live in a patriarchy hell bent on oppressing women in the west.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 06:13 AM
4

I don't think countering bullshit with other bullshit is particularly helpful, though.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 08:20 PM
2

I don't think there's really any reason to believe that it applies in this scenario though.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 08:00 PM
14

Now 20% of males score 80% of women I keep seeing that repeated, but I've never seen a source on it. Personally I prefer reddit's formatting to any chan's. I like the way that thread comments are setup so you can have side conversations without reading a bunch of disjointed shit in between.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 07:32 PM
6

I'm saying that at a foundation level there are very few biological differences between genders. I think that by in large the notion of trait-based differences between men and women are done so through their environment, they're social constructs not innate gender traits. This is seen in differences between cultures (what is seen to be masculine/feminine in some cultures in not in others) and difference in time (fads, etc., in which these views differ - things now masculine/feminine were previou…
/r/MensRights03/10/15 05:47 AM
1

The shooting was a tragedy, but its overshadowed by the larger tragedy of a war against men led by a matriarchy that is intent on destroying the very thing it needs to survive. Unfortunately, the only way for this to truly end, giving the lack of self awareness of those in the matriarchy, is for everything to collapse. I think hyperbole like this hurts anyone neutral looking in.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 03:25 AM
2

Canada has the same man hate problem and similar gun laws, but has fewer of these mass shootings per capita. Isn't Canada's healthcare, including mental healthcare, socialized?
/r/MensRights03/10/15 03:23 AM
2

I think you misunderstand. It is not that either gender "owes" anyone anything. But there are behavioral differences between genders are present even in infants before socialization can be blamed, and are even seen in our evolutionary ancestors. This is why people who oppose feminism keep saying "stop trying to treat boys like girls." Boys need time to rough house, to get that energy out. That isn't to say that girls shouldn't be allowed to do that as well, or that some don't need that, but as a…
/r/MensRights03/10/15 03:20 AM
2

Does that take into consideration that women are more often the winners of sole custody?
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:49 AM
2

Please don't link clickbait here. It only encourages them to write more shitty articles like this. Either ss it or archive it and link that instead.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 04:58 PM
1

Part of the mythos of being cut is denying it causes any harm at all. My argument has nothing to do with whether it causes harm or not, but that causing psychological harm is not the intent. Saying "We'll show them we're not broken or afraid!" does nothing, because nobody thought you were in the first place.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 06:07 AM
2

Did you respond to the right person? I didn't say anything about a loss of sensitivity.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:49 AM
25

Men aren't circumcised as a way to break them or to put them in fear. Your reaction is a complete misunderstanding of your opponents' motivations, and without debating those, you will never solve any issue.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 04:09 AM
2

Luckily it's getting downvoted. This whole article is dumb though. Men guessed right 55% of the time? Ok... wtf does that have to do with mens' rights?
/r/MensRights22/09/15 04:16 PM
2

I disagree. And I still don't understand why I am being called out for what someone else said.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 07:18 AM
2

I still don't see how saying he is acting over protective is vilifying him. I didn't say he should watch his car the entire time he walks to drop off the cart. He is a stay at home dad and doesn't have to go at peak hours. Leaving his children in the car for 30 seconds is not as bad as you are making it out to be. They will be fine.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 06:33 AM
3

Vilify isn't the word I'd use. I'm not really sure how what I said was over-hyped, but ok. All I said was that he sounds like a helicopter parent. Too afraid of the world to let his kids out of his sight for 30 seconds. And are you really serious about it not being reasonable for a person to look around while walking with an empty grocery cart?
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:41 AM
1

That spot isn't always available.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 12:37 AM
6

You're a helicopter parent in denial about being one. Your kids will survive for 30 seconds in the car with the window down (even in florida!). Look both ways before crossing the lane of the parking lot so you don't get run over by those cars that are going a max of 20mph.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 12:36 AM
14

The absolute worst are the people who do that with stuff that has to be frozen or refrigerated. Even if an employee sees it 15 seconds later, they have no way to knowing how long it has been there, so they have to throw it out. So you just wasted the food because you couldn't be assed to put it back where it came from.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 12:30 AM
2

I thought one of the goals of the mrm was to not become petty like feminism is...
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:43 AM
1

That's about child sex trafficking, which I don't think anybody is arguing to legalize.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 05:32 PM
0

I'm right there with you. It seems like people here would rather focus on petty bullshit rather than real problems. At least feminism worked on a few good things before they started complaining about manspreading. MRAs, or at least this sub have started at that shit.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 08:21 AM
3

High heels are actually pretty practical for riding horses. (the kind they first made, obv not stilettos or anything)
/r/MensRights24/07/15 06:34 PM
6

Only 18% of the US population call themselves feminists. That doesn't mean that only those people will read those articles. In fact people link that click bait shit here all the time. They don't care what bullshit they say, as long as it gets clicks, and inflammatory content gets clicks.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 04:25 PM
13

To be fair, it's not like reddit handles heavy traffic well either.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 11:34 PM
3

the red pill. They're a community of people trying to develop the skills to be successful with women. Outside of their community though, they are thought of as misogynists. I tend to agree with the latter, but I'll let you judge for yourself. Despite feminists painting them and mras as the same group, the two generally don't get along. Mras think they're misogynistic, red pillars think mras are pussies. /r/TheRedPill
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:47 PM
1

But my point is that people here will on the one hand complain that the protection is unfair and that it shouldn't happen, and then turn around and say they should have the same protection, in fact asking for a double standard that goes the other way.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:58 PM
-12

Just because those portrayals are banned doesn't mean that they necessarily should be, and that men should follow suit. It may not have been the best example, but I often see here a lot of sensitivity about issues, while at the same time decrying feminists for being sensitive about issues. There is a line of thought that "it's ok when we do it, not when they do" and I think it's wrong with both do it. OTOH, if they post specific threats and/ or photos of the target person's home, car, family, et…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:23 AM
-22

But it's not just role-reversal and saying look this would be bad. People actually get upset and say shit like men being shown as dumb in commercials is a serious sexist issue, or people getting outraged at tumblr posts. I've even seen people here saying they've gotten "death threats" because someone has told them online "Die in a fire" or something similar. People here are quick to call out feminists for claims like that, but don't question it when it's someone on their side, and the irony that…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 10:22 AM
3

The fuck are you talking about? I never said that feminists were campaigning for the rights of men. I said they use shit logic in their arguments and that we shouldn't do the same.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:42 AM
14

Why is this such a persistent line of thought in this subreddit? "If feminists use this twisted logic to make stupid claims, we can use it to make ridiculous claims against them" No, they are wrong for trying to do shit like that, and you are wrong if you do it against them too.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 07:21 AM
3

I couldn't tell you. I've never read the books either.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 01:45 AM
15

Honestly I'm not 100% sure because I don't watch the show. I just remember a lot of people mad over some shit in it. Here's a few posts from TiA: http://i.imgur.com/Nssigx6.png, http://i.imgur.com/d8wPvUj.png
/r/MensRights05/05/15 01:21 AM
58

I don't have to come up with an imaginary scenario. Look at the backlash game of thrones received when a girl was tortured vs a guy.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 12:32 AM
15

Wasn't meninist satire? Why would we want to muddy the lines and associate actual mens rights with that?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:05 AM
2

Just like all of reddit.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 07:07 PM
2

You realize there are people that are neither mras, nor feminists, right? People are concerned what they think. This subreddit is the face of the movement in many ways, and it is important not to turn off neutrals just because someone wants to bitch.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:51 PM
-1

Which goes to illustrate the problem this thread is talking about even more vividly I think in this case it illustrates that people will only read a headline, and go circlejerk about it if it reaffirms their beliefs.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:47 PM
1

A lot of people I see here are people who have been hurt and don't really have any where else to go. /r/MensRants
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:45 PM
2

People telling him not to get married is a lot different than people telling him to jump off a bridge because she'll drive him to suicide...
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:43 PM
6

There are other subs that are better suited for that though. Places like srssucks or tumblrinaction
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:36 PM
8

And about venting, I personally don't think that this should be the place for it. Perhaps someone should create "/r/ MensRightsVenting" or something like that. /r/MensRants already exists. I just wish people would filter to there more.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:34 PM
3

And yes I would say there are some posts here with vitriol and some with rage, especially some comments If not that, endless snark and sarcasm.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:32 PM
15

Right. This number going up is actually a good sign.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:10 AM
1

I didn't say that. I said as a whole, feminists are not proactive about it. To my knowledge, Jaden doesn't consider himself a feminist anyway, so it's a moot point.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 03:38 PM
5

They have the right to, but you're insane if you think it's remotely socially acceptable. Feminists "standing up for it" is more of a "yeah that'd be cool but we're not gonna actually do anything about it."
/r/MensRights12/04/15 10:45 AM
5

They started it That's the argument you're going with?
/r/MensRights11/04/15 12:42 AM
4

To be fair, I don't think you'll find much feminism on fox news.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:54 AM
1

Except that heart attacks are on the rise among women. I loathe to use charged words like victimized, because it puts a spin on it that makes it seem intentional. Obviously it was not, but there is good reason to now have some of the research focus on women. http://www.webmd.com/heart-disease/news/20091026/heart-attacks-on-the-rise-in-women
/r/MensRights31/03/15 05:33 AM
4

http://heart.arizona.edu/heart-health/prevent-heart-attacks/uniqueness-heart-disease-women Doctors themselves were not looking for cardiovascular issues. Heart disease in men and women is different. The link describes it better than I ever could.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:41 AM
3

They're focusing on how it manifests specifically in women, which has been under-served in the past.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 01:59 AM
7

Heart disease is commonly seen as a "man's disease". It baffles me how most people here seem to be blind to this.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 01:12 AM
8

Heart disease actually manifests differently in women than it does in men. And no, they haven't been helped as much as you would like to believe by the current heart disease research, which is why one focused on women is not a bad idea. http://heart.arizona.edu/heart-health/prevent-heart-attacks/uniqueness-heart-disease-women
/r/MensRights31/03/15 01:09 AM
5

The problem is that disease has been seen as one that only affects men, which isn't the case. It also manifests differently in men than in women. This is trying to correct that. It has nothing to do with feminists making men a servant underclass.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 12:52 AM
13

Yes, yes they have said it's a man disease. In the past it has been viewed as only affecting men. Why do you have a problem with a campaign that says "Hey we know this is viewed as not affecting you, but you're actually at risk too!" Would you take issue if there was an awareness campaign targeted at blacks, telling them to use sunscreen?
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:08 PM
2

The female variety can, but there are multiple forms. It can be removing the clitoral hood, or just a ceremonial pin prick, as well as things in between. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation#Classification
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:03 PM
3

Even a ceremonial pin prick is classified under fgm, and is treated with just as much disdain. If it's simply a matter of who gets harmed more, a pin prick is a lot less severe than removal of the foreskin.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:01 PM
1

kay i just thought of an interesting game to play. 1) buy a cosmo and read every article. all of them. no skipping. That's not a game, that's torture.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:17 AM
1

Try putting a rubber band around it.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:16 AM
1

As a shitlord, I take offense to that. Please don't compare cosmo to any of my work.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:15 AM
1

First, this movement has a whole lot more to work on than petty shit. And you most certainly not start off petty if you want to be taken seriously. Modern feminism is petty, sure, and is taken seriously, but only because it is riding on the coattails of its predecessors. Second, I agree that one side shouldn't be able to do it while the other can't. But the answer isn't to ban them from doing it, it is to let both sides do it, because ultimately it isn't a fucking big deal, and it gets a laugh o…
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:14 AM
2

The op wasn't pointing out the hypocrisy of feminism, he was said this shit needs to stop. Meaning he, and by extension we should be, upset about it.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:11 AM
67

For real. I'm tired of people saying "well feminists would get upset, so we should too!" and using that as an excuse. Most people here would agree that feminists overreact to every little thing that they dislike. Why would we want to be like that?
/r/MensRights21/03/15 05:27 PM
3

Please use archive links to not give these types of articles ad revenue, which increases the incentive to make them.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 06:15 AM
2

First thing below it is a bar of options to upvote, downvote, favorite, and then post options and tags. Beneath that are comments.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 01:33 PM
-1

I see no link to any video in the image.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 01:24 PM
18

You may not agree with the classification, but it is according to the World Health Organization. It's under type 4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation#Classification
/r/MensRights18/03/15 01:10 AM
19

Redefining terms to make it seem like there is more prevalence of a crime that is viewed as having only female victims. This seems familiar somehow... Oh right! Rape on college campuses. Fucking despicable, the lot of them.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 12:50 AM
8

Some types of fgm are a ceremonial pin prick.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 12:47 AM
1

0 citations and clickbait title. This is not a good infograph.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:06 PM
1

Its also ignoring any survivors of the war who come home, but had to see the horrors of war.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:40 AM
4

And what about the men who don't die? The ones that just end up with missing limbs, or with severe trauma because they saw their friends die horrific deaths? Is raising children alone a fate worse than what they go through?
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:39 AM
0

You find it hard to believe there isn't a rule about tearing down flyers at a school?
/r/MensRights12/03/15 09:48 PM
9

I don't think that silencing them (that is what physically removing their message is) is ever a good idea. Maybe put up fliers underneath that debunk the claims would be a better option.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 09:48 PM
1

Not quite. I think that our opponents are crazy and will make up any excuse to demonize us, as you said. I think that there are third parties that will see what they say though, who may or may not believe the bullshit. And the more reasonable the mrm comes across as, the better.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 12:35 AM
1

You really think they're going to not take anything we say, no matter how mild or reasonable, and twist it to suit their own agenda? Seriously? Of course they will, but why make it easy for them? Why give them screenshots to show? Do you really think this criticism hasn't come up time and again over the last 4-5 years? Which, oddly enough, are the years in which the MRM finally broke into mainstream consciousness after decades of [very polite and non-hyperbolic] obscurity. I don't think it's fai…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 04:14 PM
1

I see, we need to write at a third grade level No, I think it is better if you write what you mean though. and tone police Cmon, are you really gonna use feminist buzzwords as a defense of your hyperbole? B. the undecideds. Like myself, I was an undecided. I read in other subreddits about how crazy and awful /r/MensRights was. I heard it so often that I eventually had to come see for myself. And then I stayed because I agreed with everything. IIRC, a similar thing happened to /u/girlwriteswhat f…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 04:06 PM
1

It's not really about the people that are actually taking those statements and making the claims. Its about making sure that it is crystal clear to the people they are showing it to that it is not true.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 11:15 AM
1

I don't think that hyperbolic statements are useful when your opposition frequently takes statements out of context, then highlights them and says "MRAs literally believe this!"
/r/MensRights23/02/15 08:05 PM
0

Ok I'll rephrase the question. Do you really think feminism holds the kind of power over men that slave owners did over slaves?
/r/MensRights23/02/15 02:06 PM
-1

Oh come on, do you seriously believe that the relationship between men and women is equivalent to slaves and their owners?
/r/MensRights23/02/15 06:38 AM
5

The far majority of teachers I've had try to pick students who they haven't heard from. If someone is raising their hand to chime in on every discussion, they try to pick others first.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:06 PM
4

The wage gap is dismissed because every time it is brought up, the reason given for it is discrimination. People will chant "equal pay for equal work." If people wanted to have a discussion on early gender roles and what contributes to those choices, I'd wager you wouldn't see nearly as much dismissal of their arguments. (Though I personally would also tend to think that a major group telling young women that a profession is full of misogynists would contribute to those girls staying away, and c…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:11 PM
3

Not exactly the type of attention you want, though.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 08:51 AM
5

I'm not sure even how to begin with how wrong this statement is. So let's go with an easy example. Only men can vote, and only men are in public office, who dictate policy. You think women who can neither vote, nor hold public office somehow magically got the right to vote without men?
/r/MensRights16/02/15 08:50 AM
0

Some of the reasons it was thought of as only a man's disease. http://heart.arizona.edu/heart-health/prevent-heart-attacks/uniqueness-heart-disease-women
/r/MensRights13/02/15 07:18 AM
0

Some of the reasons it was thought of as only a man's disease. http://heart.arizona.edu/heart-health/prevent-heart-attacks/uniqueness-heart-disease-women
/r/MensRights13/02/15 07:17 AM
1

Some of the reasons it was thought of as only a man's disease. http://heart.arizona.edu/heart-health/prevent-heart-attacks/uniqueness-heart-disease-women
/r/MensRights13/02/15 07:17 AM
0

Some of the reasons it is thought of as a man's disease. http://heart.arizona.edu/heart-health/prevent-heart-attacks/uniqueness-heart-disease-women
/r/MensRights13/02/15 07:16 AM
1

You're looking way too much into the wording of this, and stretching it to see the worst possible result.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 07:12 AM
1

There's so much in here. Feminists would be outraged if ___ Okay, maybe, but they're not because it isn't happening right now, why not focused on something that is actually happened instead of a hypothetical. Then there are the people who take it even further Feminists would be outraged if ___ involved women , so we should be outraged if it involves men! Nevermind the fact that they also call feminists hysterical for being outraged about every little thing. They'd rather be hypocrites and imitat…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 07:10 AM
8

The gamergate thing is hilarious. Gaming journalists are corrupt GG. Gaming journalists aren't corrupt, gg'ers are just a bunch of misogynistic man-children trying to keep women out of the inustry! Gaming journalists. Gaming journalists are taken as a reputable source for wikipedia. Surely no conflict of interest there at all, right?
/r/MensRights10/02/15 11:44 PM
1

I wouldn't mind so much if people were complaining about the hypocrisy, but they're complaining about the commercial itself.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:11 AM
1

I'm not sure that feminism was the cause of the disposable male idea. I'd say that came before them, and they have no problem with it. But you're right, you'll never hear a joke like that in an ad because people will bitch and moan about it, and I think that's wrong.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 08:20 AM
13

I'd like to correct you a little bit. Being a victim is not a good thing at all. Being perceived as a victim, however, and you're laughing all the way to the bank.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:24 AM
1

If told the right way it could be funny, sure. I don't agree when feminists get all worked up over jokes, and I don't agree when mras do it either.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:10 AM
0

This explains some of the reasons why it was thought of as such. http://heart.arizona.edu/heart-health/prevent-heart-attacks/uniqueness-heart-disease-women
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:00 AM
1

Here's a pretty good article on them. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/02/22/breast-cancer-awareness-ribbons.aspx I have no idea what you're talking about with the HIV shell and leukemia thing though.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 12:23 AM
7

I mean, they probably should right? Women have always been the primary victims of prostate cancer. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons to cancer. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children. =P Edit: I made that tongue in cheek comment before seeing this video. Now I'm just disappointed.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 11:58 PM
-1

That's fair, my comment was based off seeing a few of these posts pop up on these ads.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 11:55 PM
4

I'd like it if there were some type of breast cancer awareness for men, (though not like pink ribbon, susan g komen is the absolute worst)
/r/MensRights08/02/15 11:52 PM
1

Because it's generally only thought of as a men's issue, so there actually is a need to raise awareness about it, unlike say breast cancer in women, which everyone is aware of.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 11:51 PM
14

I get where you're coming from with this, but not every campaign has to be targeted at the bigger demographic. In fact there should be at least some representation of the one not affected, because they may not even be aware they are at any risk for it. It would be like if they were to put out an awareness campaign that men get breast cancer too.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 04:51 PM
2

I didn't say it's a good commercial, I just don't think calling for a public apology is over the top.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:23 AM
1

It made a joke at the expense of boys. There is a difference.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:19 AM
-1

The most civil way possible is to ignore a commercial you don't like and move on with your life. If you hate it enough don't do business with them. Demanding a public apology is overreacting, me telling you that you are overreacting is certainly not.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:01 AM
-1

I'm not sure if you realize that the commercial was supposed to be a joke.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:53 PM
-1

What the hell are you talking about? I'm responding to your post, not someone else's. Yes, "demanding a public apology" is overreacting. And you're right, if it was the other way around we would never hear the end of it, because feminists overreact to everything. This sub loves to talk about how much they do it, but then you get shit like this which is the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:53 PM
-1

I'm not attacking your character, I'm attacking your overreaction to a commercial.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:28 PM
2

No, this is you throwing a tantrum and trying to get others to join in because you were not the target audience of an ad.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:12 AM
66

By linking to these articles you are giving them page views, which is more incentive to write similar articles because they are popular. Something to think about.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 02:09 PM
1

And any sanctions placed on the sorority by the school? Any damage to its reputation?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:50 PM
0

You think money comes before the legal ramifications if the party is caught serving alcohol to underaged students? What about the liability involved if someone at that party gets alcohol poisoning?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:05 PM
-2

There is an issue of liability that is more than simply monetary. Yes, they don't want to assume the risk of hosting them there, because why should they? Frat houses are perfectly willing to do that themselves. But simplifying it down to "they don't want to spend their own money on drinks" is an oversimplification, and a lousy one at that.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 05:01 PM
-5

The issue you gave of paying for drinks is a stupid one. The much bigger reason they don't want to host a party is that they then assume all the risk involved. Anything stolen, broken, or if anything bad happens is now a much bigger hassle for them. Saying things like "girls won't go anywhere unless their drinks are paid for" makes you and this sub look stupid and sexist.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 05:55 AM
2

I guess in my view it depends on how many things we have in common. If we are both white males that live in the same neighborhood, we will have a better chance knowing what the other deals with vs a white female living in the same neighborhood. But I will have a better understanding of what a white woman in my neighborhood goes through vs a black man who lives in another state. If we are are allowed to communicate, and can have a frank discussion, then understanding will follow. That is the crim…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:17 AM
13

I dunno. I don't really have a problem with that line of thought. I really won't ever know what it is like to be a woman. The part that annoys me is that no feminist I've ever read or talked to seems to acknowledge that on the other hand, they have no idea what it is like to be a man. It's the same thing with the "privilege is invisible to those who have it." Ok, makes sense, but only if it applies to everyone. Men can't see the small advantages they get because they think everyone gets them. Wo…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 09:52 PM
-1

Wealthy men were more formally educated than wealthy women, however. And yes, there were exceptions to the rule. There always are.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 05:02 AM
2

He didn't only say science. He said scientists, leaders, poets, scholars, artists, etc.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 05:00 AM
0

I mean, men were formally educated while women typically were not.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 03:08 AM
3

I've never had this happen to me.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:19 PM
10

This is the complete opposite of my own experiences. Men seem to move out of the way probably 75% of the time, and women seem to move out of the way maybe 10% of the time. And every time I've had to squeeze my way through a group of 4 people walking side by side taking up the whole sidewalk, its been girls.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:27 AM
1

Of course nobody thinks, oh this ideology makes it impossible to meet a girl. But that doesn't mean the reason for signing up is to pick up chicks. That's what makes it hurt more, is that these people their own wants to try to listen, and are met with disdain.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 04:10 PM
2

I think you have their motivations wrong. They, at least if they are like me, didn't listen to feminism because they expected to get something out of it. They listened because they thought it was the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 07:44 AM
3

Well if they act like the Rolling Stone's "journalists" they'll just ignore her.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:55 AM
1

That doesn't even make any sense, and shifting definitions are not something anyone should emulate.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:35 PM
2

Gonna go out on a limb here and say that gamergaters are not huffpo's target readers.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 10:37 AM
10

Wait. Ex? You just made my night!
/r/MensRights29/11/14 12:02 PM
-9

That's pretty much the opposite of what she said. She said what society is teaching boys on what it means to be men is harmful- something this sub I thought agreed with.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 06:27 AM
6

Using the current legal definition, yes. A problem many people have though, is that definition does not include "forced to penetrate," which falls under its own category. I and many others here would argue that should be considered rape, but it is not included in statistics as such.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 02:44 AM
11

Its tumblr. Getting mad and posting it here is like a feminist going to 4chan and getting offended, then posting it.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:46 AM
2

The whole goal? They literally have no other goals? Really?
/r/MensRights30/09/14 09:03 PM
2

Forgot the np link last time, so let's try again. http://www.np.reddit.com/r/NoBullshitGaming/comments/2hv8il/people_who_are_not_in_the_loop_keep_asking_me/ And again, people in this thread are a little too quick to give up.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 10:47 AM
1

WoW has really toned down the differences. Have you played in the last few expansions?
/r/MensRights30/09/14 10:42 AM
3

It shouldn't be. But for whatever reason, people listen to stars. Sometimes good comes of it, sometimes very very bad things, like Jenny Mccarthy's anti-vaccination movement.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:58 AM
55

Here's what I think people are annoyed by: She mentions some issues that men face, but seemingly only as lip service, because the organization the speech is supporting does nothing to help men. It feels deliberately misleading, like she is trying to say this organization supports both men and women, when it does not.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:55 AM
5

Ha, I didn't even catch it until now.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 10:50 AM
2

Are student health centers going to start handing out free sex contracts for both parties to sign along with their free condoms?
/r/MensRights29/09/14 10:08 AM
15

I just hate to see this subreddit become the male version of SRS. Constant circlejerking on how bad feminism is. Maybe my hopes for this place are different than other people's here, but I'd like it to be a resource for both people who consider themselves mra's, and those wanting to learn more about it. If a news story comes out showcasing it, fine (like the fraternity story), but saying "Feminism's entire goal is to hurt men" and nothing else, then labeling that as a discussion, is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 09:29 AM
41

You tagged this post discussion, but included nothing other than an unfounded inflammatory sentence for a title, and no discussion to back it up. The only thing that will come of this is a circle jerk thread. Maybe you should try again.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 08:41 AM
-1

It seems like the artist wants us to agree with the woman. If they wanted to show that people don't care about men, there would have been much better examples, like someone with a physical labor job, or someone who lost his friends while on a job with a high mortality rate, etc.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:50 AM
-2

Because many women aren't allowed to even walk the streets without a male, let alone get a job to support themselves or their children. Divorce not being an option at all isn't something to strive for.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 08:05 PM
1

Not until the video evidence came out. Before that it was a 2 game suspension.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:51 AM
2

Why do they even belong on this board in the first place?
/r/MensRights09/09/14 09:04 PM
1

People here argue with statistics all the time. They can be completely misleading and misrepresentations of the actual situation (for example, the rape statistic on college campuses)
/r/MensRights03/09/14 12:18 AM
13

Its an opinion piece, so don't get too excited.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 12:15 AM
2

The fact that we have a sense of self, and a sense of empathy. We can imagine (after about the age of 4) someone else's point of view. We should be held accountable because we CAN be held accountable.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 12:11 AM
-1

For fifty years? No they can't. Have you looked in a history book? History is filled with people missing the larger picture for periods a lot longer than 50 years. And saying you have evidence but "you wouldn't want to hear it" when they just said otherwise is childish and inflammatory.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:03 PM
-3

I don't think they help the sub's image when people come to visit. It seems like it is more about bashing feminists than helping men.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:41 PM
-6

I wish we could separate all the "re:feminism" posts into another subreddit. They really don't belong here imo.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:35 PM
7

The fuck does this have to do with mens rights?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:37 AM
0

Showing what happens when a medical procedure goes wrong is not an argument against that procedure, it is only an argument to make it safer if at all possible. Circumcision in and of itself is wrong, and should not rely on unsuccessful procedures to try to prove that.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 10:04 AM
11

I'm not sure any sub should be default that is based around something other than an interest that people can share. Twox is by and for women. Men can post there, but there's a whole lot of topics they won't be able to be involved in. Also defaulting subs ruins them. I hate to see that happen to Twox.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 02:11 AM
13

Or its the normal retards that you normally get on default subs, and mras are getting blamed.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 02:07 AM
1

I don't think it should be immune from criticism. I just don't think it should be a main focus of the men's rights movement, or this sub to do so.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:51 AM
-1

Did any of the people who knew about this story submit it to the mass media for coverage? Or did they just assume that everyone had the same information they did, then sit back and go "SEE??" when another story got covered. If we want to play world police, we can't get involved only when it benefits us (either profit or publicity) That is what the US military is there for, like it or not. It is to protect our interests abroad. I mean hell, right on the marine corps "our purpose" page it says in …
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:05 AM
-1

My point is that bashing feminism doesn't solve anything. Point out why those are wrong, going further is a pointless waste of energy, and makes us look petty.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:04 AM
-1

When I say some things are caused by feminism, I'm talking about things like the duluth model of views on domestic violence, or the tender years doctrine, both pushed by feminists. Obviously they did not cause all of, or even the majority of the problems (though you wouldn't know that by reading the comments in this sub.) My whole point was that bashing feminism is not the answer.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 09:47 AM
2

Whoops, fixed.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 06:00 AM
-6

What the fuck is wrong with you all? You take a horror story about boys being burned alive and turn it into an anti-feminist, woe is me thread. I had never heard about this before this link, not from the media at large, and not from this sub. Why don't we actually do something productive and try to raise awareness about this issue as well, instead of circlejerking each other and snidely remarking about the world's views on male privilege? This place is getting more and more like tumblr and srs. …
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:52 AM
4

Is this due to more expensive cars being better equipped to avoid an accident? For example, breaks less likely to fail, that new automatic stopping feature, breaks stop more quickly, etc?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 07:15 AM
3

Without actual studies I'm unwilling to say which happens more often, but I know of 4 cases personally off the top of my head where it was the father who chose or is choosing not to spend more time with their child. I think this sub has a tendency to give mothers a lot of flak, and say that they are all keeping the father away, but isn't it equally reasonable to think that both mothers and fathers are equally capable of doing the wrong thing? And just because a father would kill or die for his c…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:41 AM
3

That may be true, but that's not what the article says Professor Rohner... criticised ministers for ‘pretending that one parent is as good as two, or that two parents of the same sex are as good as two natural parents of the opposite sex’.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 12:56 AM
3

It depends on the situation. Sometimes the father is the one that walks out and wants no contact. Sometimes the mother does everything she can to cut the father off, and not let him have contact.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 12:54 AM
0

as early as the first three months of his/her life needs parental attention and affection. Not giving a child that loving care early on in life, in combination with certain genes can actually cause sociopathy/psychopathy. Do you have a link to that study? Or a report on it? I'd like to send it to a friend of mine who is in another state than his child trying to make a career in entertainment for himself.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 12:53 AM
5

Just because someone disagrees with you, or even argues with you, doesn't make them a troll.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 09:19 PM
1

You prefer not to give pageviews to something that agrees with the sub? Ok.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:49 AM
2

Oh hey, good call. That's exactly what I did.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:44 AM
7

I missed the part where Obama apologized. All I read was a member of the Council of Economic Advisers said she misspoke.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 06:39 AM
2

More women graduate college; Women get far greater leniency from the justice system and, finally, women dominate HR. It said white male, I'm assuming they were comparing those to other races instead of men/women.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 07:12 AM
1

If they are particularly stubborn, yeah, the most you might get is a "i guess things suck for men too," but that's still a step forward.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 12:24 AM
2

So appeal to their sense of reason. Give them specific instances where men are disadvantaged. Don't get mad or act like its obvious. Don't be condescending, or get angry. If approached correctly, most people are pretty reasonable, and will hear you out.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:51 AM
3

These responses are depressing. I try to find out what they don't like about mra's, and if what they've heard doesn't match with reality, I correct them.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 03:24 AM
5

Don't make one unless you have read the book. That makes you as bad as the brigaders.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:17 AM
1

When you talk about power though, or a power fantasy, people tend to think of overt power. So while technically correct, calling the damsel a power fantasy is going to require explaining every single time, and will lead to a ton of miscommunication, and people focusing on that part of the discussion instead of elsewhere. Why not call it something that will avoid all of that altogether?
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:25 AM
3

I don't know that I'd call being a damsel a power fantasy. Its a fantasy, sure, just a different type.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 08:58 AM
37

How about neither?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 02:28 AM
5

The guy is doing what's necessary to keep his job, end of story.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:21 AM
7

"not all feminists are like that" Its a commonly used defense when something bad is said about any feminists.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:05 AM
6

That was the whole structure of his comment. A causes B causes C.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 03:32 AM
17

Passed out is different than drunk, and I haven't seen anyone on this subreddit conflate the two. Just because it is not stated everytime "Drunk, (but not passed out), sex is not rape", doesn't mean that people think that passed out and drunk are the same.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:28 AM
2

Nah its benevolent sexism when its for women. Only men can be privileged in the Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 06:24 AM
16

I'm gonna start calling barbie a beauty fantasy when they say that.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 06:17 AM
1

Does that test have the same reqs for both males and females?
/r/MensRights13/10/13 09:32 AM
23

Protecting potential victims starts with prevention. I thought that was called victim blaming. Or is that only when the victim is a girl?
/r/MensRights26/09/13 08:10 AM
3

Shorts?
/r/MensRights23/09/13 11:29 PM
1

First off, don't say you. I have no part in bestof or their moderating practices. /r/mensrights has shown itself trying to use bestof to get their message out, and that is not the place for it. They submitted comments that agreed with their ideology, and others would mass upvote them, not thinking if they were particularly insightful. For instance, the post in question. It is not of the same quality as say, this post. There are many posts that I've seen here that could be bestof'd, but unfortuna…
/r/MensRights23/09/13 10:02 AM
8

Dunno why you're being downvoted for providing the actual reason. People here really think its more plausible that they "just hate us" for no reason than it is that they've seen too many posts from here "bestof'd" just because they agree with them, and then tons of people here go and upvote?
/r/MensRights22/09/13 09:54 PM
11

I think the person with the womb gets that choice. Who makes the choice to carry to term? I think the person who goes through pregnancy and delivery. I completely agree. But I think that there should be some sort of "financial abortion" that the father is able to choose before the baby is born. The woman can choose then whether she wants to be a single mother or not.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:30 PM
2

Lets not be dramatic. Men aren't enslaved, and they aren't oppressed. We have disadvantages and issues that need to be addressed, yes. But over the top hyperbole doesn't solve anything, unless you're a feminist, but then you have gynosympathy going for you.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:32 PM
17

less time on competitive cupcake-baking and more on supporting those few brave women willing to run for office. Feminism supports choices for women, as long as it is the right choice.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 04:02 PM
12

I'm not so sure about that. Are they willing to take lower wages once they come back to the work force, or even when they are starting, because they have taken time off, or will stop working, respectively?
/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:59 PM
3

But is a mocking of a position that nobody here holds.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 02:39 PM
5

If only they'd shut their goddamn mouthes & quit trying so hard to be all 'equal' and shit n' just show us their perky tits when we want we'd have some goddamn order around here! You really don't think that's a strawman?
/r/MensRights02/09/13 02:30 PM
9

I don't think its that they crave it more necessarily, its just that they are able to receive it.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 08:00 PM
2

That and they don't account for repeat attempts.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 07:59 PM
20

How is.. what. No, you don't get to claim that something is sexist against you when you are receiving benefits from it. The whole "benevolent sexism" is a bullshit argument, and is just a re-framing in order to claim the victim.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:51 PM
39

all know another young woman who has wondered...
/r/MensRights25/08/13 08:43 AM
1

You know what, you're right. Radfem was the wrong class. More along the lines of those annoying girls that people just want to avoid because no matter the subject, it has to turn back to how the Patriarchy is oppressing them. I don't know what you could classify them as.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:30 AM
1

The first 18 years they do not produce anything at all. After that, I'm not sure if growing up on welfare has an affect on whether you are on welfare as an adult or not. Do you have a more balanced overview of what PP provides? I've always taken the "they do much more than just abortions" at face value. That said, if they were proposing simply making the abortions through them not funded by taxpayers, or replacing PP with something else entirely that did everything they do except abortions, I th…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:50 PM
1

I guess this is my fault for not looking into the 3% number, I assumed that was what they reported their expenses actually were, not what it was earmarked for. However, my other point still stands, regardless of what percent of their total expenses abortions make up.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:51 PM
0

You may not have meant it that way, but that's how people here are taking it. I just don't think its something that can be brought up on its own though. I hate this whole "well if this happened to women feminists would overreact" trend here. When they overreact, show them that it happens to men and nobody gives a shit. I don't think the way things are going here is an effective way of getting a point across, and feminists can easily shout "straw feminist!" Additionally I think it adds unnecessar…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:47 PM
1

Could you expand upon what you mean?
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:35 PM
7

As the other poster said, the majority of what planned parenthood does isn't abortions. More than that though, without that abortion, and contraception education, etc, we end up with more kids to parents who can't support them. (if they can't afford to abort how can they afford to raise it?) So instead of funding planned parenthood, we pay more for them through welfare. I'm not going to ague about the right of a woman to get an abortion, but it is good economically to keep planned parenthood aro…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:41 AM
2

But... he didn't say that. He said there are some misogynistic posters here, which you agreed to. Neither of you said MR is misogynistic as a whole.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:16 AM
0

"it's a diverse group, which certainly does include some misogynists—but I don't think that's [its basic] purpose." That pretty much says the opposite of what you just said.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:14 AM
1

I only skimmed the page, but didn't see anything wrong. Could you point me to what exactly is so bad, at least the part about mensrights?
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:10 AM
4

Its technically against the rules. But the admins are very inconsistent with their enforcement.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:08 AM
1

Could you give a summary of your link? It links to a content not found page for me.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 09:51 AM
1

Its really sad to watch, because there are legitimate issues like suicide rates that just get drowned out in the bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:18 AM
1

There would be some fuss, and those women would be completely in the wrong and over reacting to a simple joke, just as people here are. Just because feminists go insane at the littlest perceived sleight against women doesn't mean that mra's should do the same for men.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:14 AM
13

Just a clarification, mods are completely different from admins. Mods are just the people that run each subreddit, and their opinions vary as much as humanly possible, from SRS to theredpill. Admins on the other hand, at least a few of them, are very sympathetic to srs and overlook a lot of what they do, while being very firm in their enforcement of rules when it is subs that disagree like srssucks.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:58 AM
1

They still exist in academia though at least.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:15 PM
1

There are also plenty of sex positive feminists who don't take that insane stance that sex with men is rape though.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:15 PM
12

This is one time where I can honestly say not all feminists are like that. There is a big divide between sex negative and sex positive feminists.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 09:21 AM
2

I'd be pretty angry if I had to read my own handwriting. Its pretty terrible.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 08:11 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 09:40 PM
16

If feminists didn't claim to be the answer for men's issues, and didn't actively block attempts at creating a movement that addresses them, I might not have such a big problem with them.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:37 AM
10

You really think it is only women that expect men to fulfill their gender roles? And by the sound of your post, all women at that?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:35 AM
1

I don't remember anyone in band at my HS being bullied for it. But we definitely weren't the most popular either.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:27 PM
14

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:44 AM
17

Seconded.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 08:20 AM
8

That's not what it means. Skinny-fat is where you are technically skinny, and have a low weight, but lack muscle definition.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:30 PM
2

If I wanted to give them another unique page view, yes.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 05:21 PM
2

Could you put up screenshots for those that don't wish to give the site views?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:50 AM
9

Don't you know? Those little girls have a chance to be raped! The little boys can't be because patriarchy.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 04:15 PM
7

Where do you live? Because its much different in the US vs Europe. In the US they make their living off tips, in Europe they are actually paid wages worth a damn.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 04:55 AM
8

http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/had-enough-yet.pdf (that may not be the right one) The list of them is on http://www.avoiceformen.com/posters/
/r/MensRights11/07/13 07:10 AM
1

Usually the facebook posts are negative though. People pointing out their friend's stupid post.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:28 AM
-3

Can we stop with the facebook posts? Or create another sub for them?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:12 PM
1

I don't think outsiders would feel welcome with all the facebook posts and the like. I know I wouldn't try to debate a different side in a place like that.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 04:29 AM
3

Why not an r/askmra? I figure it should be up to the group who's "home turf" it is to set the rules for discourse. And with askwomen or askfeminism, it is their home turf.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:19 PM
6

Equally as capable yes. But one side seems to do it more often. Hopefully this remains even as the men's rights side grows and starts to include, for lack of better term, idiots.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:16 PM
10

Exactly, which is why mra's need to be the calm, collected, rational, factual side every side consistently.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:14 PM
5

My experience is a little different. It was always the guys who didn't feel they were very interesting, so donned a fedora to give them something to stand out a little. Mostly guys who weren't very social, etc.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 04:31 PM
16

In other words, tumblrs site design is awful.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 03:24 AM
1

I dunno, I consider putting it in the title pretty explicit.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:12 PM
8

What subtext? That's the title!
/r/MensRights21/06/13 07:53 PM
45

If people would like to continue the sarcasm, there's some subreddits for it, like /r/sjsucks ,/r/SRSsucks, /r/TumblrInAction, etc.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 05:22 AM
3

I thought that was "he who tops it off takes it out" in reference to the trash.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 02:38 AM
4

So uh, who had the privilege of paying for that date?
/r/MensRights03/06/13 07:39 PM
3

Well hey that's good news, thanks.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:26 AM
28

Didn't Andrea Dworkin say something to the effect of that quote though? And isn't she highly regarded by feminists?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 03:34 AM
15

Please post ss's in the future so we don't give these idiots pageviews.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 11:50 AM
32

Not everyone is fortunate to be in a position to do so.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 11:42 AM
-2

I dunno, it seemed to me he wasn't so much blaming them for the situation as saying "it is important that the buck stops here. Do better for the next generation than the last did for you" I don't see anything wrong with that sentiment.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 02:57 AM
2

I didn't say it shouldn't be said, I just said I don't think this is the right place for it.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:18 PM
120

Sorry but I don't think this is the right sub for this. I'm sorry you had a bad relationship with your mom, and it can be cathartic to let it off your chest, but this is a sub about discussing men's rights and the ways they are infringed upon. Maybe /r/mensrants would be better suited.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:52 AM
0

Could we start doing ss's instead of giving shitty sites like this page hits?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:30 PM
1

There is no positive male image outside of a career though.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:27 PM
0

Couldn't one argue that said spending gets the economy rolling though?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:26 PM
1

To be fair, sometimes those purses are gifts that the person would not usually buy themselves.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:25 PM
0

I think this sub crossed that bridge a ways back unfortunately. We need to regain it.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:43 PM
4

Yeah idk, this place seems to have become a mixture of SRS style feminism when anything happens towards a man, (instead of an objective look at the situation) along with an /r/athiesm style facebook posts and finding any stupid thing someone says online. Its pretty disheartening honestly.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 07:55 PM
3

Its fucking Cosmo, a known shit publication. Get that shit out of this sub, linking it not only increases their profits, but it does nothing to further men's rights. It doesn't increase awareness, anyone reading this sub will know cosmo is a piece of shit. The point of this sub isn't to be the other side of SRS and find any shitty statement we can and circlejerk how bad it is. There are stupid people out there, we know this. The don't need to be linked here every single time they say something. …
/r/MensRights29/04/13 02:12 AM
1

You're assuming that we won't be paying her welfare if there is no court order. I'm saying there's no difference either way, so I'd rather have the precedent there, though I think she should be in jail (didn't she lie under oath?)
/r/MensRights13/04/13 09:23 AM
1

She blew 1.5 million dollars and is now on welfare. You honestly think she is going to make something of herself?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 11:49 PM
2

Unfortunately I don't have the answer to that. All i know is that us becoming more thin skinned is not going to help anything.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:57 AM
8

Holy shit they're not actually saying to treat a man like a pet. Its a joke. And yes, it is okay in my book to joke about women too. Humor should be tolerated as a form of expression.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 12:00 AM
9

I hate that line of thinking. "Feminists are over sensitive so we should be too." No, we shouldn't. They need to develop thicker skin, not us develop thinner skin.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 10:48 PM
0

And actually one of our most important weapon in this fight is to show others (outsiders) the harm feminism has done. Please tell me, what harm do ignorant facebook posts do? People in here have started to complain about the most mundane shit lately. We talk about how feminists are bitchy women who are looking to be offended, but then turn around and say "feminists would get offended if it were women in this scenario, so we should be offended too." It makes no sense.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 09:08 PM
5

News says you shouldn't leave dads alone with kids, srs comes in here to say how its bad for women. Sounds about right. Edited my typo
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:17 AM
3

You're right.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:15 AM
5

They were just lashing out against the years of white oppression they've been under. Can we really hold that against them? And likewise can we really feel that bad for this shitlord whitey? Maybe if his race had done a little less oppressing this wouldn't have happened, so he kind of had it coming. Man these mental gymnastics can be a real mental workout.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 02:44 AM
11

Surprised at no sexual assault, but The victim’s name has not been released. makes me happy
/r/MensRights18/03/13 11:32 PM
2

This would be more suited to srssucks, not here. Its even lower quality content than posting some idiot on facebook. We know the people at srs are all crazy, no need to post it here.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:24 PM
16

Your question is flawed. Everybody knows males don't have problems /s
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:21 AM
1

"But the government is controlled by menz, so its still the men that own all the property."
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:00 AM
9

Hey thats a generalization. Some have boyfriends that support them too.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 05:33 PM
12

Sexist against womyn because it would be highlighting that men only view womyn as sexual objects.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 11:03 PM
1

I'm not sure, it was a long time ago that I saw the article and I can't seem to find it now.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:13 AM
2

Seems I was mistaken, and confused two different studies. One that I can't find at the moment, where they took serial rapists and had them pick out targets in a parking lot, and they all picked the same ones, and this one where they talk about child victims being more likely to be victimized as an adult.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:12 AM
1

My bad, I think I sort of confused two different studies, one like you were talking about where each rapist picked the same targets, with this one is talking about child victims being more likely to be victims as an adult. http://www.ibiblio.org/rcip/mvrv.html When I said "open" I mean open about it without being prompted. Not having any hesitation about talking about it. But you could be right, maybe once a victim has gone through therapy it might be normal to talk about, I really don't know.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:10 AM
7

Questioned, maybe. But that's not what we're dealing with. These people should honestly be able to sue for libel against the accusers. There is forever a stigma attached with their name, even amongst those they love. For some reason rape in this crime is seen as guilty until proven innocent in the minds of most people.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:51 PM
12

To be fair, studies have shown that if a girl has been raped once, she is more likely to be raped again. They took rapists and had them point out their targets, and those that had been raped already were almost always chosen. Something with the way they carry themselves I guess. That said, I don't blame the skepticism. Especially depending on if she is open about it. If it doesn't seem like something she doesn't want to talk about, I'll have a hard time believing her.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:46 PM
0

Holy shit thank you. I'm so tired of this sub saying that feminists are crazy, and then saying "well feminists would bitch about this so we should too." On the one hand we say feminists are too pc and uptight, can't take a joke, but then do the same exact thing and blow up every minute little thing. I understand that many people here are bitter, but so are many feminists. That's no excuse to make mountains out of molehills. The "feminists do it, so we should be able to too" is a bullshit argumen…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:47 PM
3

I think when they say top level comment, they mean one that replies directly to the op, instead of replying to a comment.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:15 PM
7

But it does exclusively say that it is a boy that will grow up to be violent, not a girl.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:18 AM
3

I don't see it as one pendulum, I see it as many, some swung too far in one way and some in the other, but some people only see some and some people only see others, and some people make up their own pendulums as well. This is fucking excellent. I think attempts to generalize anyone as oppressors or victims all the time is completely off base.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 01:22 AM
7

The problem is men have been fighting to get rid of it for years, now they see this as an opportunity to try another tactic. Step 1 get women in it, step 2 work with women to get rid of it altogether.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:33 AM
22

So when we were having a conversation about world war 2 and I started talking about Hitler and the nazis and someone called Godwin's law on me, they were wrong?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 03:34 AM
7

But what does that have to do with this incident? Its actually the opposite, the man does not wish to sit next to the child. Could it have been gender discrimination? Possibly. They may not have deemed a woman a flight risk for the same request. But as you said, it is speculation. We have enough concrete examples of problems without watering down this sub with guessing at people's intentions.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:24 PM
3

Or will go see it in order to judge for themselves.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 04:19 AM
2

He means what did you post that got you this response?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:18 AM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights10/01/13 06:52 AM
2

I'm confused, isn't this graph combining both violent and sexually related crimes? Or is one of those d1-4s a sexual assault classification?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 08:24 AM
6

I'd like to see statistics on suicide attempts that don't include repeat attempts. I highly doubt that women would lead men 2 to 1.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:07 AM
2

I believe "fake and gay" applies here.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:15 PM
12

They are the far majority though, and I don't think pointing that out is a bad thing. It opens the door for research into why that is the case. The problem comes when people say men are the majority of mass murderers, so men must be more violent than women and cannot be trusted.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:06 PM
5

http://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslinks/comments/y0mnx/dvipc_summary/ Those links seem to agree that women tend to be hurt more severely, but not subjected more often. We are able to classify injuries, so why not just do that instead of classifying male on female automatically worse? On a side note though, I'm with the other comments that have asked for a source on what state or states this is in.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:58 AM
1

I assumed that the brother was not the legal guardian.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:21 PM
0

So the privacy of your brother means nothing to you. Would you be mad if you found out someone had been doing the same thing to you? What happens when you find some really embarrassing stuff on there that he doesn't want anyone to know about?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:31 AM
12

*irk
/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:51 PM
6

I've gotten them from bad stomach aches. Doesn't matter who would've asked me, the answer would be no.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:04 PM
9

This needs to be at the top.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:51 PM
3

Are they actually donating? Or did they just paint a mustache on their planes and call it a day?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:09 PM
1

Please don't turn this sub into /r/athiesm with tumblr instead of facebook posts. We know there are many, many idiots on tumblr, there's no reason to have this place spammed with all their shitty ideas constantly.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:51 PM
6

If women didn't make lower wages then men she wouldn't have been forced into prostitution to make a living. /s
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:20 AM
3

To be fair I have heard "that's not lady-like" used.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:18 AM
1

I've seen big and big and tall, but not just tall #skinnyproblems
/r/MensRights14/11/12 11:51 PM
1

Idk, I thought that's kind of what the marriage was: an agreement to stick around.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 03:21 AM
0

He wouldn't walk out on his job, and not die in an accident. I'm talking, he gets fed up with where he is in life, finds another woman, and leaves his family behind. I'm absolutely of the opinion that a man should be able to opt out of a child before they are born, but once they have been married and had children I feel that there is an implicit contract there, and it should have to be honored.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:48 AM
1

I was envisioning more of a "walking out" scenario, where he wants nothing to do with the family anymore. In this case, he made a commitment, and should be required to keep it imo.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:25 AM
1

What happens when a man and woman are married and have a child or children, but then years down the road, when the kids are, say 5 and 7, the man wants to get a divorce? If the woman has been a stay at home mom this whole time, obviously she tries to go and get a job, but it will be very very tough for her to get a job that pays enough to support the three of them.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:20 AM
2

This poster sucks, but its also at least the 3rd time its been posted here recently.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 10:22 PM
9

Every other course that is taught is male-oriented /s
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:22 PM
2

To be fair, I'd be willing to bet if this explanation was in his post he wouldn't have gotten so many downvotes. I just dismissed it as an irrelevant quote until you said why it wasn't.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 10:12 PM
3

Yeah this one kinda pisses me off. Why is it more acceptable to have an infant have to eat it a nasty ass public bathroom than it is to have him breastfeed in public?
/r/MensRights03/11/12 10:00 PM
12

That's why we have to pick only 12 issues that are important to the world, dammit. Zero sum game my ass!
/r/MensRights29/10/12 06:28 PM
-1

I'm too tired to tell if you're being serious or not, so I'll assume you are. You got that she was serious about it from the single 140char or less tweet?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 09:20 AM
2

Are you sure this isn't oh, I don't know... a joke? Or this new sarcasm thing I'm always hearing about?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 09:00 AM
5

Maybe there should a separate subreddit for that though. I think it does us a disservice when people come here to see what we're about and find post after post of people just ranting about things that if not seen through the lens of it being an example of the norm, rather than the exception to it, would seem petty.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:53 PM
12

seriously? which one? i don't know of another subreddit where men could get support for some of the shit we have to deal with because we are male. I think they are suggesting a new one, not to take all of the rants to another existing subreddit.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:47 PM
2

When did that happen? I must've missed it.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:15 PM
2

The premise of this question is stupid. Its just as stupid as when women talk about how violence against men doesn't concern them because it is mostly male on male violence. There are some things that require both sexes to change.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 07:28 PM
2

The SPLC includes the MRM on their "hatewatch." http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/misogyny-the-sites
/r/MensRights16/10/12 08:25 PM
1

Where was the part I was supposed to like? I don't get enjoyment out of people being unreasonable and buckling down on their own misguided beliefs despite evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 02:51 AM
3

I'd rather have the crotch shot so I stay anonymous. One bad picture or having people come and find your facebook? I would pick the former.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 01:50 AM
1

"The true victims of war have always been the women and children."
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:23 PM
30

It is stupid when the feminists do this, and it is stupid when you do this. If you want to point out double standards, by all means do so, but we are not supposed to be feminists but for male issues. And if we are, please let me know so I can exit swiftly.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 12:24 AM
7

The difference is thousands of nerve endings. When you chop off the foreskin, you take a ton of sensitivity with it.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:57 AM
5

OR, just as many atheists think that all Christians are ignorant, hateful scumbags, when I have found the majority are not, it could be that the intelligent, reflective, and observant atheists that you have met have simply not mentioned that they are atheist.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:22 PM
18

but but mensrights only fights against straw feminist! /s
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:11 PM
5

I upvoted AnnArchist's comment because of my anecdotal experience. Every single man I've known who was in the military and went overseas who had a girlfriend or wife was cheated on. Every single one.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 02:54 AM
-5

Where the fuck do you live? I've never heard of someone being liable for child support after donating sperm...
/r/MensRights28/08/12 09:13 PM
1

I think you read into what I said too much. I didn't judge one way or the other on your sources, I simply disagreed with your statement that stats can't lie.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:46 PM
1

I didn't say that. I'm simply saying that it is important to know where the statistics came from and what their flaws can be.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:38 PM
2

Stats don't lie Actually, they do. Especially in cases where the stats rely on information of reported crimes, or when there are many variables that cannot all be accounted for. Just google lying statistics, there have been several books written about this subject.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 11:01 PM
1

Just because some it should be called genital mutilation doesn't mean it is better known as that already. That is what Comowl was trying to get at.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 10:48 PM
3

/r/mensrights is not misogynistic. Would you have said that was misandrist had it been a punch in the balls? My guess is you would not have. In conclusion, neither. Please leave with your double standards and baseless assumptions.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 10:41 PM
4

Obviously a woman could have done the job faster. In fact if women had been working on getting a man to the moon, it would have been done years earlier. Just another example of how the patriarchy affects everyone. /s
/r/MensRights26/08/12 01:28 AM
8

Sorry, you didn't compare the two, you said that one leads to the other. And that the guy who asked her up was violating her boundaries, was creepy, and was telling her that he cares more about what he wants than what she wants. You got all this from him asking her for coffee. Was she giving off signals she didn't want to be bothered? I don't know, I wasn't there. But I do know different girls give very different signals, and he could have easily mistaken or overlooked them. Her escape is exitin…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:21 AM
9

Did you just seriously compare someone asking another person to their room for coffee to a threat of physical harm? The rest of your rant is irrelevant, because everyone agrees that men and women should not be douchebags after being turned down. The solution is to try to fix that, not to tell men that they are not allowed to ask a girl out.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 11:41 PM
3

or jokes about cutting off a penis oh wait, they already do that
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:43 AM
1

Because its not credible it is perfect for reddit? I don't follow the logic.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:16 AM
2

Name me some flagrantly sexist. manhood101 comes to mind, but as you said, they are not tolerated here, whereas it seems that feminists don't do enough to get rid of that kind of talk when it is against men.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:19 PM
3

I don't think that's true. It is, at least partially the other branches' responsibility to differentiate themselves from wbc. I believe that most Christians do very well in that. However, along those same lines, I don't believe feminists do. There was a post awhile back that compared the structure of feminism to Christianity, in that there are many different branches of both. But where you talk to a Christian and they will say "oh I'm a Presbyterian" or Catholic, or Baptist, etc, feminist all wi…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:16 PM
22

I'm so glad you're here to tell me that me feeling angry at the loss of my own bodily autonomy is silly. Thank you for enlightening me how i should feel.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 07:07 AM
3

Um, perhaps because children are not property? I can't imagine dealing with my parents' divorce without my brother. Your shitty "easy" system would rob me of not only that, but of even seeing my other parent. And from the other side, you would deprive one parent from seeing their child. Again, they are not property, and something that can be replaced. It is not right when fathers are not able to see their children, so you want a system where it is guaranteed that neither parent will be able to s…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:34 AM
3

I would rather live as a prisoner today than as a man back then. Yes life sucked for women back then. I guess you could say they were akin to prisoners today. However, it was not any better for the men. The men back then were not like the guards of today. There isn't really anything I can think to compare it to that exists today because society has advanced beyond a need for that role.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 06:33 AM
2

The title was supposed to be sarcastic.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 12:03 AM
8

So glad I'm not alone in hating political correctness. I understand there is a double standard here, but the problem is that feminists can't laugh if the roles were reversed, not the fact that they can laugh because its a man.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 09:13 PM
1

The whole point of it is you add the phrase "Would you rather" to the start of either option, then choose which you would rather have happen to you, or have to do, or whatever the case may be based on the topic.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 06:48 AM
4

would you rather have grown up without a father? or grown up without a mother?
/r/MensRights26/07/12 06:35 AM
6

The difference, at least as far as I've seen, is that men's rights tries to distance itself from toxic members' views, where feminism does not, and in fact makes some of the worst offenders, like those who post on rad fem hub leaders.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 05:55 AM
12

This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. "Its not mutilation because they don't cut off as much as they do with female genital mutilation" If someone chopped off a guy's arm, he was mutilated. If someone chopped off another guy's hand, he was mutilated as well. Nobody tells him that he wasn't just because guy 1 had it worse.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 07:41 AM
26

Most of the opinions spewed by westboro baptist church make me angry, and I have pretty good reasons for thinking as I do on those matters.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:43 AM
22

because there aren't feminist males who are just as harmful as some of the feminist females
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:11 PM
6

Congrats, you found a feminist who was ugly, that doesn't mean they all are, and generalizing like that is stupid. And by the way, yes, I have. But even if I had not, it would still be a stupid thing to do. MRM is not "feminism for men." We do not employ the same tactics that they do, because we do not believe the same things they do. Stop giving us a bad name.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 09:49 AM
15

Oh come on, this is as bad as the feminists who say that mra's are all virgins who can't get women. Let them make themselves look foolish by using ad hominem attacks, don't sink the mrm to that level.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 09:24 AM
1

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -Evelyn Beatrice Hall (often misattributed to Voltaire) Censorship is a very slippery slope, especially when you are not seen in a positive light to begin with. By the way, until proven otherwise, I will view this as a work of satire.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 08:10 AM
19

There is only one picture that you could say compares with a girl in a bikini... and it is the twilight guy, idk his name. Honestly this looks like someone's desk got pranked, and op is looking for things to be mad about.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:55 PM
3

Many people in this subreddit, myself included, are circumcised and want the choice for future boys that we never had.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 01:42 AM
2

Useful in what way? Why is it best done when the child has no say in what happens to him?
/r/MensRights12/07/12 10:11 PM
13

I'm happy that you like the cosmetic surgery performed on you when you were an infant. Many people do not, however, and are fighting for others to have the choice whether to have the procedure or not. I am circumcised as well, as are many others here, so I don't know where you are getting that this community "HAVE NO FUCKING IDEA HOW IT FEELS LIKE," but why is it wrong for us to want every boy to make his own decision about his body?
/r/MensRights12/07/12 06:45 PM
5

Comedy is another subject entirely. But do I wish the world was less pc? Of course I do, but there is a time and a place. And when you have many people trying to pick apart every single thing you say, or anyone who tries to associate with you says, it is my belief that you should be extra careful, and give them no ammunition.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 08:13 AM
4

Fine, but don't associate yourself with a movement when you do it. It makes us all look bad. This is an extreme example, and what you are doing is nowhere near it, but take a look at Westboro Baptist Church. They hurt Christianity as a whole, and bystanders look at one bunch of idiots and think the whole religion is similar.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 08:03 AM
4

It is like you're not even attempting to understand me. Yes, men are stereotyped, quite often, and guess what, it fucking sucks. That doesn't make it ok to stereotype women. Yes we should point it out when it happens, but that does not mean it is ok to do the same thing right back. You do not have to prove to me that men's issues exist. All I am saying is be better than the movement which we claim to hate. The things they say and do are wrong, but that does not make it right to say the same thin…
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:57 AM
6

Big surprise, women trying to manipulate the law as usual. That's not a fact, that's a generalization. Yes, women attempt, and in far too many cases succeed in manipulating the law to harm a man, because they are in the position to be able to do so. If men had that chance, would there be certain men that would do the same thing? There is not a doubt in my mind there would be. That wouldn't mean that it would be ok to generalize all men into some spiteful group trying to harm the other sex throug…
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:20 AM
8

I would argue with that statement though. I believe that constantly campaigning for men and only men to stop violence and rape does reflect poorly on feminism, and I point it out whenever I see it. I just believe it needs to be shown, because as you say, it is ingrained in our culture. However, just because they do make shitty sexist statements doesn't make it right for us to. Take the high rode, and give nobody a reason to say that mensrights is in any way hateful towards women.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:09 AM
11

You probably won't win any of them over, you're right, but they are not your target. You are trying to win over any rational, thinking person who is reading but not posting. Show them what we know, that feminism is a hate movement, and that Mens Rights is not.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:02 AM
3

Not only is she not being dragged through the street, the person committing the violent act is not a man... How stupid are the people who come up with these titles?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 06:55 AM
5

You're right, you're not a bitch for not wanting to be cat called. However, what we're mainly discussing here isn't the cat calls, but men trying to go flirt or chat with a girl in a bar who he finds attractive. He hasn't done anything crude, but is then turned down and called a creep simply because he isn't her type. Someone who was her type could do the same exact thing and she would not object in the slightest. It sounds to me as if you dislike cat calls no matter who they are from, and thus …
/r/MensRights21/06/12 05:58 AM
2

sort of fits under attractive doesn't it?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 05:42 AM
2

wait what? when and where?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:21 PM
1

I know I'm gonna regret asking this, but who is manboobz?
/r/MensRights07/06/12 10:42 PM
21

"prosecutors determined that they could not meet their burden at trial of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and had an ethical obligation not to pursue it further” This quote restored my faith in our justice system.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 05:17 PM
7

That poster is fine until the last bit. Then it becomes every bit as bad as that stupid urinal cake saying "the power to stop rape is in your hands" by saying "its on you". You're attacking someone who hasn't done anything wrong. On a different note, my favorite is "Anti-feminism is not anti-woman"
/r/MensRights04/06/12 06:57 AM
3

It's saying. "Think about what rape is." But it's not. If the urinal cake had said something like "Most rapes don't happen in an alley." Then had a website to go read more I would be fine. But that is not the case.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:09 PM
4

This. Let's please stop with the us vs them mentality. There are hateful, sexist feminists, but to assume they all are that way is the same as the people who say everyone who stands for men's rights hates women. Both are stupid and get us nowhere. Having the two extremes argue at each other accomplishes nothing. If you need proof look at America's political system.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 07:27 AM
14

"I’ve been thinking of a way to explain to straight white men how life works for them" Are you kidding me? Try saying that sentence with any other sexual orientation, race, or gender and see how well it is accepted.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:16 AM
3

It's a youtube comment. And yes things like that are said all the time to women posters and nobody gets upset because it is so over the top everyone knows it is a joke.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter