TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Coleridge12 Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by Coleridge12 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Nowhere in my post did I put forth any intellectual argument about which to be dishonest. I interpreted the other person's potential interpretation of the language of the last line of the poster. I did not attribute responsibility to or away from feminism or the men's rights movement for anything.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 02:55 PM
2

I'm not saying I agree with the initial interpretation, just that the implication was capable of being gleaned from the last line of the poster. I agree with the multilateral interpretation of it. The difference being that the line in the poster went "girl agent, boy recipient" instead of the reverse or having the reverse as another line.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:57 PM
82

The poster above likely believes that the last line carries a heavy implication that women (and feminist practices, as women might be expected to be the primary agent of those) are to be the main actors in gender equality, whereas men lack the ability to effect the same change through their own action. Whether this is correct/meaningful is another matter.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:45 PM
23

By the 1600s, it was rather widely accepted that the solar system was heliocentric.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 02:25 PM
0

If by "back then," you mean the 1960s and the Vietnam war. Since, before then, ALL individuals otherwise eligible to vote (including women) were incapable of voting until they were older than 21. If, by "back then," you mean the era of the Vietnam war, then conscription as a clear justification for the extension of suffrage occurred in the eleventh extension of suffrage in American history, nearly two-hundred years after the birth of the country, and to all individuals including but not limited …
/r/MensRights31/12/12 09:06 PM
-1

If you could please demonstrate where the draft was used as a reason for all men to gain the right to vote, I would be more willing to consider your position. Until then: The draft, or a draft, has been in place in the United States since the Civil War. In no documents pertaining to the construction or ratification of the 15th Amendment is national conscription referred to as justification for the extension of suffrage to African-American men. Native Americans received the right to vote in 1924,…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 08:41 PM
-2

I am not taking credit for anything. Men already had the right to vote before the first World War. Nothing occurred after World War I that extended the right to vote to male Americans of age, because all male American of age already had the right. The draft, then, is not used in any law or Amendment existent in the United States as justification for voting. Does the draft suck? Yep. Is it unfair to men? Absolutely. Is it used as justification or a mechanism by which the voting rights of an indiv…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 08:10 PM
-2

No, downvoted because apparently, the right of women to vote is not an act of equality for women.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 02:57 PM
3

I think they're intending it to cover discrimination unrelated to the actual nature of the disability. Whether someone has a bum leg because they lost it in a car accident has no direct effect upon their ability to perform a variety of tasks, jobs, and social roles, and thus ought not be held against them.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 03:23 AM
2

Gays. I'd like some federal rights and privileges, please <3
/r/MensRights06/11/12 03:35 PM
2

The means of implementation, usually. Forced sterilization, breeding, or mass eradication tens to make me the saddest of pandas. The concept itself is noble, to some small degree. But then, social justice is very much noble and good in concept.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:19 PM
3

I don't think you're quite understanding the terminology. In the understanding that most people engaging in "FtM transgendered genderqueer" usage would possess, "male" and "female" are not gender terms. Those are terms defining sex. "Masculine" and "feminine" are gender terms, the only ones that exist in a masculine-feminine gender binary. FtM is indicating their sexual transition. Since it means "Female to male" it isn't violating a gender binary, as it is describing sex. Sex and gender are not…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:55 PM
6

As a guy who was in the liberal arts, and does write on and believe in the use of language to objectify thing and other such "trivial nonsense": it's not trivial nonsense, it's generally quite true, and some people ludicrously take having any knowledge of it as indicating they have carte blanche to be morons. You've got people who use eugenics to do stupid, terrible shit. You've got people who use liberal arts to do stupid, terrible shit. One is worse than the other, but the other's a hell of a …
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:51 PM
24

"Cis" stands for "Cisgender," which is when the gender identity of an individual matches their physical sex.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 01:11 AM
5

Ronald McDonald certainly wants you to buy his burgers, and has stated as much. And he's not alone. The idea that fast food should be bought is common, well, required by clowns, let alone radical clowns.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 03:44 AM
9

"Face it, feminists want a matriarchy, and would rather see men all locked up only to be used for reproducing." Come on. There is no way that is anything other than utter nonsense. Do some feminists want that? Possibly. Is it even remotely close to anything approaching an innate characteristic of feminists, no. Don't engage in hyperbole, and don't over-generalize.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 05:54 PM
2

You have no idea how or in what fashion the cop "advised" him. Don't call it "intimidation" unless you know for a fact that the police officer was brandishing either a weapon or the threat of the law. It could very well have been simple, plain advice that people are morons and that those people would think he was a molestor and call again. That is not intimidation. Cops have every right to speak and interact with people as normal people do given that, behind the badge, they are in fact normal pe…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:47 PM
2

The original said "Real Men Don't Buy Women" and was an advert against sex trafficking, as women are vastly over-represented in that.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:34 PM
2

I know they are, that's why I compared it to the original.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:34 PM
2

Having seen the original of that (and maintaining a deep and abiding crush on Gerard Butler), that disappoints me.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:00 PM
0

I have to agree pretty much completely here. Especially with that second video.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 04:07 PM
4

Could be, yes. Most likely is not, however, given the prevailing cultural associations with that phrase.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 11:48 PM
3

It's definitely referring to a female. The hegemonic masculinity in the sex trade cannot be ignored, which is very much where this shirt draws its inspiration from through the "gangsta" culture associated with a majority of the saying on the shirt.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 11:34 PM
3

Thaaat's a bit much.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 08:43 AM
1

ohohohoho
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:42 PM
2

I only remember this because I connect it to Flowers for Algernon.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 06:12 PM
6

Samesies. The extreme level of gender politics in some of the relationships of heterosexual people in my life has made me quite happy that I can just tell my boyfriend and I can simply be blunt and tell the other that we're pissed off and why, and then carry on. And none of the "you're not a real man" stuff, because we're already not real men in the eyes of society. Just comfort, easy communication, and dicks. Lots of dicks.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 10:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter