~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Skewness in attractionAre heterosexual men more attracted to the opposite sex than vice versa ? no | /r/ExRedPill | 11/12/24 10:11 PM |
| 0 | If a woman wants a financially stable man who can provide for her while she does nothing, it's considered empowering.Well, for one, 91 percent of child custody after divorce is decided with no interference from the family court system. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/21 11:30 PM |
| -1 | If a woman wants a financially stable man who can provide for her while she does nothing, it's considered empowering.When men fight for custody, they actually win more often than women. It's just that so many men don't even bother showing up to court. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/21 09:54 PM |
| 2 | Women yelled "Yes" when I told her I was a virgin.Um... don’t do that. | /r/ExRedPill | 13/12/18 12:38 AM |
| 3 | Women yelled "Yes" when I told her I was a virgin.What's this about keycards? You were sneaking into a gym where you are not a member? And they didn't just kick you out the first time they had to talk to you about your behavior? | /r/ExRedPill | 12/12/18 11:27 PM |
| 8 | Contracual requirment to maintain promiscuity in a Marrige[CA]He defended his use of the word. This shows that it was not an error; it was intentional. There's a difference between making an error and being wrong. He's just wrong. And he doubled down. What's your goal here? | /r/MensRights | 30/01/18 05:19 PM |
| 8 | Contracual requirment to maintain promiscuity in a Marrige[CA]Misusing the word “promiscuous” to mean something entirely different than how it was intended is neither a typo nor semantic error. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/18 03:44 PM |
| 27 | Contracual requirment to maintain promiscuity in a Marrige[CA]But you're even wrong about the colloquial meaning of "promiscuity". You're the only one in the world to whom that word means something other than "fucks lots of different people" or "non-monogamous". To everyone else, your title reads as "contractual requirement to fuck other people while in a marriage". But sure, double down :) Oh, and you're the "founder" of a crypto-coin? With your inability to spell common words ("lose"), misuse of words "promiscuity", and your obvious dim-wittedness, that … | /r/MensRights | 25/01/18 04:28 PM |
| 134 | Contracual requirment to maintain promiscuity in a Marrige[CA]Do you know what "promiscuity" means? You might wanna look it up. Also, if you think you're about to be rich from an ICO... um.. okay :) you're totally not getting scammed. I promise. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/18 12:05 AM |
| 1 | I had an interesting thought on the wage gap.I'm sorry you feel so disposable. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/17 07:51 PM |
| 1 | I had an interesting thought on the wage gap.You keep contradicting yourself. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/17 06:02 PM |
| 1 | I had an interesting thought on the wage gap.You can't have it both ways. Either culture/society pushes men to kill themselves AND pushes women to make decisions leading to less income, or neither. The wage gap is caused by something. You're arguing that culture/society play no role? What do you feel is at the root of the wage gap? What do you feel is at the root of the suicide gap? | /r/MensRights | 04/04/17 05:50 PM |
| 1 | I had an interesting thought on the wage gap.The suicide gap: Seems like men are discriminated against by the choices they make. It's almost as if men can't be trusted to make good decisions. If men are so stupid they can't figure this all out then the ones encouraging them and liberating them from their male idiocy must be women. So women need to be empowered to tell men what is best for them. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/17 05:22 PM |
| 1 | CMV: if men on average were better in bed, men would get laid more often and there would be more casual sex.Totally up to you. I wasn't really trying to change your view, just give some tips should you find yourself hooking up with someone in the future. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/10/16 09:12 PM |
| 1 | CMV: if men on average were better in bed, men would get laid more often and there would be more casual sex.I get it. Maybe you could find a way to make things easier for them. Some women prefer to ensure an orgasm by using a vibrator throughout. Or even warming up with it too, while giving a blowjob or making out. I've noticed that as women age, they tend to figure out what works for them better and are more comfortable being direct about their needs. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/10/16 09:01 PM |
| 1 | CMV: if men on average were better in bed, men would get laid more often and there would be more casual sex.Everyone is different. You mentioned you like the entire mouth to be involved in oral sex. I've found that to be the case most of the time, but I've been with women who prefer soft strokes with the tip of the tongue while using a finger or toy, and I've been with women who dislike oral sex all together. You're assuming that every previous partner of every man you've been with has the same preferences as you do. I've also been with women to whom I had to explain what I like, in terms of blow jobs… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/10/16 08:49 PM |
| 1 | CMV: if men on average were better in bed, men would get laid more often and there would be more casual sex.Tell guys what you like and they'll do what you like. Pretty simple. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/10/16 08:34 PM |
| 2 | Men were asked to stand to honour women at a concert. I didn't. What are your thoughts?How is that any different than being upset over breast cancer charities because they only spend money on a cancer that affects mostly women? Shouldn't the charity spend their money on research of men's cancers too? When you donate to a charity, they should divide the money, with half going to prostate cancer and the other half to breast cancer. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/16 08:25 PM |
| 1 | Men were asked to stand to honour women at a concert. I didn't. What are your thoughts?I went to a concert once where the organizers were donating some of the money to a breast cancer research charity. They did this whole thing before the show where the organizer came out and spoke about how his wife had recently died from breast cancer and explained how important it was to him to be able to donate some of the concert profits. You know what I did? I stood up and booed. I screamed "WHAT ABOUT COLON CANCER!? WHAT ABOUT OTHER CANCERS? We should be trying to stop all cancer. It's sexi… | /r/MensRights | 02/08/16 06:27 PM |
| 3 | Should I accept the fact that things will never be as good for me as they were in college in terms of the social life and the hook up scene?Basically, put yourself in a position of power over women, then use that power to coerce them into having sex with you, right? Is that what unappealing men have to resort to in order to get laid? Cuz that seems awfully pathetic. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/08/15 09:46 PM |
| 4 | Should I accept the fact that things will never be as good for me as they were in college in terms of the social life and the hook up scene?I'm glad you can have a sense of humor about your decline into flaccid senility. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/08/15 07:35 PM |
| 3 | Should I accept the fact that things will never be as good for me as they were in college in terms of the social life and the hook up scene?You stopped? Not very red pill of you. You sure you should be giving advice here? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/08/15 07:32 PM |
| 1 | Ellen Pao just was made mod of an SRS sub. Affiliated subs include /r/againstmensrights. "Thanks for the warm welcome" - /u/ekjpBut... you do realize your content/userbase is very much the same Yes. I never denied this. your affiliated sites are themselves affiliated with SRS We are not affiliated with any other sites or subreddits. The links in the sidebar are subreddits we're fans of or that have similar themes. and every other moderator of negareddit is also not only direct frequenters of SRS but also moderating SRS affiliated subs Not every other mod moderates SRS subs. But either way, that fact still does not mean o… | /r/MensRights | 17/07/15 03:53 PM |
| 1 | Ellen Pao just was made mod of an SRS sub. Affiliated subs include /r/againstmensrights. "Thanks for the warm welcome" - /u/ekjpActually, I invited her, at Terk's suggestion. If you don't believe us, look at the modlist on the sidebar of /r/negareddit. | /r/MensRights | 14/07/15 08:18 PM |
| 2 | Ellen Pao just was made mod of an SRS sub. Affiliated subs include /r/againstmensrights. "Thanks for the warm welcome" - /u/ekjpOP linked the URL incorrectly. He included both "np" and "www". It's safe, just a fucked up link. | /r/MensRights | 14/07/15 08:17 PM |
| 2 | Ellen Pao just was made mod of an SRS sub. Affiliated subs include /r/againstmensrights. "Thanks for the warm welcome" - /u/ekjpFYI: I created /r/negareddit. I am banned from SRS. /r/negareddit is not affiliated with SRS. Some of the other mods are SRSers. | /r/MensRights | 14/07/15 07:55 PM |
| 1 | As a woman, have you ever been turned on by a man boasting about the number of women he's had sex with?But people weren't asking for an "illustration", we all can imagine a woman being turned on by some dude bragging about how many chicks he's banged. OP asked women how they personally would react. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/05/15 03:02 PM |
| 1 | As a woman, have you ever been turned on by a man boasting about the number of women he's had sex with?Wow. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/15 10:53 PM |
| 1 | As a woman, have you ever been turned on by a man boasting about the number of women he's had sex with?Yes, let's argue semantics. The point is, your argument suffers greatly from the choice you made of citing a work of fiction. It's not that weird to have a romantic relationship with a sibling. I mean, just look at Star Wars. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/15 08:31 PM |
| 2 | As a woman, have you ever been turned on by a man boasting about the number of women he's had sex with?For a man, you sure think you know a lot about what motivates women. You're making a LOT of assumptions. LDC is appealing because he's appealing. Not because he's appealing to other people. Hardly anybody (hell, I might even say nobody) who isn't attracted to him is going to change their mind when they realize most other women are. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/15 07:41 PM |
| 1 | As a woman, have you ever been turned on by a man boasting about the number of women he's had sex with?Sure, sometimes. It's just a sign of the strength of your argument that you need to resort to citing fiction to make your point. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/15 07:37 PM |
| 2 | As a woman, have you ever been turned on by a man boasting about the number of women he's had sex with?It's a horrible example. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/15 04:48 PM |
| 3 | As a woman, have you ever been turned on by a man boasting about the number of women he's had sex with?Did you just seriously cite a movie in an attempt to make a point about reality? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/15 03:50 PM |
| 2 | As a woman, have you ever been turned on by a man boasting about the number of women he's had sex with?Are most men (or even just you) are anywhere near his league? Why do RPers always use celebrities when they're trying to make a point? You don't have his money, looks, charisma, or ability to help a career. 99.99999% of men don't either. He's not getting laid because women know he gets laid a lot. He gets laid because he's fucking Leonardo Di Caprio. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/15 03:46 PM |
| 6 | What's your take on this MGTOW post about Female Strategy?Are older guys attractive to women or not? All you've said is that women like money. So do men. What's your point? If you're correct in thinking women only date men based on their ability to provide money, why would they bother entering into a situation where they're relying on someone else for money when they could go earn their own? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/05/15 09:52 PM |
| 5 | What's your take on this MGTOW post about Female Strategy?They are literally on the payroll. That's their career. Also, Hugh Hefner isn't exactly a redpill hero, what with his promotion of promiscuity and previous male lovers. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/05/15 08:45 PM |
| 8 | What's your take on this MGTOW post about Female Strategy?If most guys let themselves go before they even hit 30, why would women ever be interested in older guys? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/05/15 08:44 PM |
| 0 | What's your take on this MGTOW post about Female Strategy?Wait... So when someone calls out the argument as using an outlier, you come at them with "yeah, it uses an outlier, but so does this unrelated straw argument, so you're wrong."? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 14/05/15 08:43 PM |
| 1 | BP, Whats the biggest Red Pill belief you disagree with?Has it made you emotional "like a woman"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/03/15 09:05 PM |
| 1 | BP, Whats the biggest Red Pill belief you disagree with?So you've never done HRT but argued that someone can't make claims about HRT because they've never done it? All while making claims about HRT? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/03/15 05:32 PM |
| 3 | BP, Whats the biggest Red Pill belief you disagree with?Why on Earth... Okay. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/03/15 03:10 PM |
| 1 | BP, Whats the biggest Red Pill belief you disagree with?? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/03/15 03:56 AM |
| 1 | BP, Whats the biggest Red Pill belief you disagree with?Have you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/03/15 11:10 PM |
| 9 | BP, Whats the biggest Red Pill belief you disagree with?Men typically only require that a women is physically attractive and pleasant. So... Not unconditional at all? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/03/15 11:09 PM |
| 0 | BP, Whats the biggest Red Pill belief you disagree with?What's so wrong with felonies? I mean from a relationship standpoint. My mom would still love me if I got busted with drugs. And if I were in a good relationship, I suspect my partner would too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/03/15 10:51 PM |
| 1 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?You're contradicting yourself. Oh well, you've also devolved into meaninglessness in an attempt to defend your lack of morals. That's okay, I don't particularly care any more. Have a good one. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 09:47 PM |
| 1 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?Yes, but you literally don't consider the feelings of others. You don't see how this negatively affects others? Sure, you might not care, but at least acknowledge that negatively affecting other people is objectively a bad thing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 09:04 PM |
| 1 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?You say you lack a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience. That is a sign of mental illness. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 08:24 PM |
| 1 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?Everything is permitted if you can get away with it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 08:01 PM |
| 1 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?So you're a sociopath? Honest question. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 07:53 PM |
| 1 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?You've stated you have no moral or understanding of morals and don't consider yourself a good person. Feel free to correct me. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 07:10 PM |
| 1 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?You seem so unhappy, it's depressing even just talking to you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 06:29 PM |
| 1 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?This entire thread is about moral judgement. Notice OP asked "is it wrong" not "is it legal". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 06:12 PM |
| 1 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?Everything is permitted if you can get away with it. Do you consider yourself a good person? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 06:10 PM |
| 1 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?But if the dividing line for you is purely based on the law (that's the justification you gave for why 16 is okay), then why are you not okay with 13 even if it's the law? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 06:08 PM |
| 1 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?Did you protest? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 05:56 PM |
| 0 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?Okay, maybe. But that's neither here nor there. Your logic could be used to justify literally ANYTHING. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 05:52 PM |
| 0 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?So first you were arguing something was okay because animals do it? And now you're arguing something is okay because it's been done in the past? You do realize there's a bunch of shit throughout history we've moved past and now acknowledge as wrong, right? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 05:46 PM |
| 1 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?There are 5 European countries where the age of consent is 17 or 18. And there are more European countries with an age of consent under 16 than European countries with an age of consent of 16. Hell, Spain has an age of consent of 13. Would you argue it's not creepy for a man in his 50s to fuck a 13 year old? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 05:43 PM |
| 0 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?That's not a good justification. Animals rape and kill without judgement or regret. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 05:35 PM |
| 0 | Is it wrong for an older man to date a significantly younger woman?You don't find anything morally wrong about taking advantage of a mentorial relationship to manipulate someone into having sex with you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/03/15 05:16 PM |
| 1 | The true Paul Elam. A man who use women. A Coward that abandoned his children. A charlatan who pretends to care about men. Make no mistake AVfM is a business that's about lining Paul Elam's pockets.Let me give you my impression of this thing I didn't actually read. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/15 08:36 PM |
| 5 | Feminazi shared this on her Facebook yesterday for International Women's Day!Okay, that's neither here nor there when discussing whether this is satire or not. It looks like you're just trying to derail. If you think it's satire and just don't like it or don't think it's funny, that's okay. But you're claiming it's not satire without actually making a point or addressing any of mine. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/15 10:06 PM |
| – | Feminazi shared this on her Facebook yesterday for International Women's Day!No, you just don't get the joke. You know how some people tell women things they could have done to prevent their rapes? Like "you shouldn't have gone out dressed like that" or "you should have paid more attention to your drink" or "you shouldn't have gotten drunk". Well, many people find that type of suggestion offensive, believing that it places the responsibility of not getting raped on the victim rather than on the rapist. This joke is satirizing this, and I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn'… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/15 09:49 PM |
| 3 | Feminazi shared this on her Facebook yesterday for International Women's Day!I see no mention of the rapist's gender. Yes, they refer to the victim as a woman. That's because this is a joke satirizing the idea that women are responsible for preventing someone from raping them. The joke doesn't make sense if they had left out the victim's gender. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/15 09:00 PM |
| – | Feminazi shared this on her Facebook yesterday for International Women's Day!Why are you assuming this is directed at men? I see no mention of the rapist's gender. Yes, they refer to the victim as a woman. That's because this is a joke satirizing the idea that women are responsible for preventing someone from raping them. The joke doesn't make sense if they had left out the victim's gender. I really don't see what could possibly be upsetting about this. Sure, it might not be your type of humor, but it in no way has the meaning you ascribed to it. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/15 08:57 PM |
| -6 | When you really think about it, the men's rights movement is actually really fucking respectful of women.Nobody actually believes this, right? I mean, MRAs do all this shit constantly. In fact, if an MRA did the things you're saying they do, they'd be accused of being a feminazi. If this is seriously how you view the MRAs, you should probably get to know the "MRM" a bit better before you decide to designate yourself as one. You really couldn't be more off the mark. On almost every single one of your points. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/14 10:27 PM |
| 2 | Denied ride for being male...A Voice for Men are the most visible face of the MRM. As soon as they start preaching hate and separatism, I'll no longer call myself an MRA. No, you'll just convince yourself they aren't actually preaching hate. Kinda like you already have, because they already do. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/14 07:24 PM |
| 0 | The Onion - Judge Rules White Girl Will Be Tried As Black AdultNo, I'm pretty sure it's just one thing: your racism. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 08:16 PM |
| 0 | The Onion - Judge Rules White Girl Will Be Tried As Black AdultWhat does that have to do with it? | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 06:41 PM |
| 4 | My biggest question for MRAs: truly curiousKind of a sad "cause" then... | /r/MensRights | 21/08/14 10:15 PM |
| 5 | My biggest question for MRAs: truly curiousThere are no "grander" gender issues, at least not in the western world. So you agree, the "Men's Rights Movement" isn't needed? | /r/MensRights | 21/08/14 10:01 PM |
| 1 | "I am not sure what happened last night", one year later, "You raped me!"Why are you telling me this? | /r/MensRights | 14/07/14 11:28 PM |
| 3 | "I am not sure what happened last night", one year later, "You raped me!"Thanks. Explains the time warp. | /r/MensRights | 14/07/14 07:59 PM |
| 7 | "I am not sure what happened last night", one year later, "You raped me!"k. I didn't report. Also, your input's a bit late. | /r/MensRights | 14/07/14 07:25 PM |
| 14 | "I am not sure what happened last night", one year later, "You raped me!"What the heck are you talking about? I made a comment over 2 months ago and now you're accusing me of brigading and reporting? Leave the comment. Please. Why would I want you to delete proof of rape apologia? People should know that kind of thing is accepted here at /r/mensrights. Also, when I come across him elsewhere on reddit, I want to know what my RES tag ("rapist") for him is in reference to. | /r/MensRights | 14/07/14 07:09 PM |
| -4 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comIs that what you thought I was trying to do? | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 09:33 PM |
| -3 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comExactly | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 09:02 PM |
| -5 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comAs opposed to these supposed "Men's Rights Activists" in academia? heh... | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 08:35 PM |
| -4 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comGood one. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 08:09 PM |
| -2 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.commodern feminism | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 08:06 PM |
| -5 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comClassism and racism? You've got me curious now. I'd be interested in hearing what you have to say about classism and racism within feminism. In fact, I wouldn't be too surprised if you had some good points about that. Please share. Edit: almost an hour later and I'm still waiting... You've responded to my other comment since then, so it looks like you have no interest in actually discussing this alleged aspect of feminism but would rather make non-specific attacks on the entire movement. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 07:31 PM |
| -7 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comYou're really really mad at women huh? It's just terrible that they now sometimes have access to birth control and can vote. It's almost like they're people too. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 07:23 PM |
| -8 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comYou just listed a bunch of shit from 100 years ago... | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 07:20 PM |
| -5 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comHow is that disingenuous? Someone said that extremists don't represent a movement and that this article is like pointing at feminist extremists as representing all of feminism. I said that that happens in this subreddit. He said it's called out and downvoted when it does. You proceed to do exactly what he said and were not downvoted and were only called out by a non MRA. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 07:03 PM |
| -7 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comLook down juuuust a little bit in this very thread. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 06:58 PM |
| -1 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comDid you ignore the top part of this thread and what I was responding to? You did nothing but prove my point 100%. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 06:56 PM |
| -3 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comOh, so you're agreeing with me. And strangely, the author of the linked article. I misunderstood you before. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 06:47 PM |
| 1 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comMy only point was that people in this subreddit often point to extremist feminists as an example of what feminism is. Do you disagree with that? | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 06:31 PM |
| 1 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comGood one. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 06:29 PM |
| -4 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comI disagree. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 05:41 PM |
| 26 | 5 Uncomfortable Truths Behind the Men's Rights Movement -Cracked.comdigging into the worst depths of tumblr to comment on modern feminism as it's presented in academia. People from this subreddit do exactly that ALL THE TIME. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/14 05:11 PM |
| 0 | Does TRP Really think women shouldn't vote? (Or other basic human rights?)Again, we're not debating that. I have no interest in debating racism's validity. We're debating the definition of racist and whether you fit that description. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/14 07:39 PM |
| 1 | Does TRP Really think women shouldn't vote? (Or other basic human rights?)There is no such thing as a positive stereotype. All stereotypes are unfair. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/14 07:32 PM |
| 1 | Does TRP Really think women shouldn't vote? (Or other basic human rights?)You just said that "Asians are good at math, black people are fast, etc." That's some of the simplest, least thoughtful, idiotic crap a racist can spew. Also, I noticed you only listed "positive" stereotypes. Care to list some negative stereotypes you believe are true, Mr. Not-Racist? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/14 07:28 PM |
| 1 | Does TRP Really think women shouldn't vote? (Or other basic human rights?)Whatever race you are must be pretty stupid, eh? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/14 07:16 PM |
| 1 | Does TRP Really think women shouldn't vote? (Or other basic human rights?)You don't want to list anything specifically, huh? Realize that it's impossible without again exposing your racism? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/14 06:46 PM |
| 1 | Does TRP Really think women shouldn't vote? (Or other basic human rights?)there are indeed some populations that are in some sense "less recently evolved" since their traits have staid stagnant. So... some races are more primitive than others. That's what you said. Would you like to list some of the differences between races? In what ways are some races more primitive than others? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/14 06:07 PM |
| 1 | Does TRP Really think women shouldn't vote? (Or other basic human rights?)You used the word "primitive". Saying something is "less primitive" is the same as saying "more advanced". Things that are more advanced are superior. You believe some races are superior to other races. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/14 05:19 PM |
| 1 | Does TRP Really think women shouldn't vote? (Or other basic human rights?)Think what you will, but you literally just said that some races are more genetically primitive than others. What do you think racism is? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/14 03:39 PM |
| 1 | Does TRP Really think women shouldn't vote? (Or other basic human rights?)Just because you believe there is a scientific basis to your racism doesn't mean it's not racism. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/14 03:33 PM |
| 1 | Does TRP Really think women shouldn't vote? (Or other basic human rights?)Holding that view is the definition of being racist. I'm not going to waste my time trying to change your view, but you could at least be honest with yourself and admit that you're a racist. I mean, you've just admitted it to me, now admit it to yourself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/05/14 03:12 PM |
| 2 | Does TRP Really think women shouldn't vote? (Or other basic human rights?)That's not true. http://www.skincancer.org/prevention/are-you-at-risk/skin-types-and-at-risk-groups http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5621a2.htm | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/05/14 09:46 PM |
| 5 | Does TRP Really think women shouldn't vote? (Or other basic human rights?)My point is, you can be a white supremacist while also believing that other races are better at certain things. The logic being that you feel those advantages are due to being more primitive or subhuman. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/05/14 03:36 PM |
| 2 | Does TRP Really think women shouldn't vote? (Or other basic human rights?)Hitler did that too. As stated in Albert Speer’s Inside the Third Reich: “He was highly annoyed by the series of triumphs by the marvelous colored American runner, Jesse Owens. People whose antecedents came from the jungle were primitive, Hitler said with a shrug; their physiques were stronger than those of civilized whites and hence should be excluded from future games.” | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/05/14 03:14 PM |
| 1 | Will the Men's Rights Movement be on the right side of history?Financial abortion rights IS very radical. Or even FORCED abortions in situations where the man does not want to be a father. Also, the belief that rape cannot exist within a marriage. Or the belief that false rape accusers should be punished as strongly or stronger than actual rapists. Or the argument that women should not be permitted to work certain jobs, regardless of skill/qualifications. Or the million other crazy things radicals within your "movement" want. | /r/MensRights | 15/05/14 11:03 PM |
| 60 | "I am not sure what happened last night", one year later, "You raped me!"and she no longer makes such promises. That's fucking chilling. You are a rapist. | /r/MensRights | 30/04/14 04:57 PM |
| -2 | “The tech community works fine without females, just like any other mostly male industry. Feminists probably just want women making more money.”That's funny. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/14 08:28 PM |
| -2 | “The tech community works fine without females, just like any other mostly male industry. Feminists probably just want women making more money.”Much of her posting history is just stuff she said to piss you dudebros off. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/14 03:29 PM |
| 1 | “The tech community works fine without females, just like any other mostly male industry. Feminists probably just want women making more money.”Good one. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/14 08:55 PM |
| 0 | “The tech community works fine without females, just like any other mostly male industry. Feminists probably just want women making more money.”Nice homophobia! | /r/MensRights | 07/04/14 08:50 PM |
| -6 | “The tech community works fine without females, just like any other mostly male industry. Feminists probably just want women making more money.”Source? | /r/MensRights | 07/04/14 08:47 PM |
| 6 | “The tech community works fine without females, just like any other mostly male industry. Feminists probably just want women making more money.”People sent death threats to a dude who pulled his dumb game from the App Store. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/14 04:21 PM |
| 0 | 41 year old woman sentenced to four years in jail for sexually assaulting a 25 year old Air Force airman in AlaskaThat's actually untrue. When men actively seek custody, they get it 70% of the time. However, they don't usually fight for it. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/14 06:52 PM |
| 1 | My boyfriend is a disabled vet sent to jail for being behind on child support pmts while his ex-wife's husband fails court ordered drug test for pot and coke.People get away with shit all the time. It's irrelevant. You sound incredibly childish. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 11:27 PM |
| 1 | My boyfriend is a disabled vet sent to jail for being behind on child support pmts while his ex-wife's husband fails court ordered drug test for pot and coke.Well, if you didn't bother showing up to court I can see why to the judge it looks like you don't care about your kids. Regardless, what does any of that have to do with you refusing to pay the money you legally owe? And what makes you think you're above the law and shouldn't be in jail for disobeying the court? | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 11:08 PM |
| 9 | "Why did sillymod remove the Occidental College post?" Let me tell you why.You're on the upper half of the list, 4 from the top. It's telling that you're ignoring my actual accusation. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 05:20 AM |
| 1 | "Why did sillymod remove the Occidental College post?" Let me tell you why.Not condoning false rape accusations is never wrong. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/13 11:18 PM |
| 3 | "Why did sillymod remove the Occidental College post?" Let me tell you why.Feminists will only acknowledge false accusations if men do them. That's simply untrue. It's not a matter of opinion. Sure, maybe you could find a self-proclaimed feminist who believes this, but you could just as easily find a self-proclaimed MRA who doesn't believe rape should be punished. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/13 11:12 PM |
| 5 | "Why did sillymod remove the Occidental College post?" Let me tell you why.But... you condone false rape accusations. You just told us you deleted the submission because of trolls and stated specifically that the "bad behavior" (false rape accusations) wasn't the problem. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/13 11:10 PM |
| 6 | "Why did sillymod remove the Occidental College post?" Let me tell you why.If there had been no trolling behaviour, and it was just MR members who were taking part in the bad behaviour, I would have left it unless the admins decided it needed to be taken down. So, as a head mod of this subreddit, you're condoning false rape accusations? | /r/MensRights | 18/12/13 11:08 PM |
| 8 | "Why did sillymod remove the Occidental College post?" Let me tell you why.I'm sorry, but do you realize how incorrect you are on several simple facts that you should really know by now? I can't help but think you're just playing stupid so it's easier for you to blame someone else for that totally fucked up shit. TIL, the "men's rights movement" supports false rape accusations. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/13 11:04 PM |
| 1 | Talk about "male disposability"!!If what you were saying were true, I could understand the weird obsession. But it's not. You're simply misinformed and that's kind of sad. Though "outlawing beliefs" doesn't seem like a very effective nor humane way to handle a perceived threat. You're going to have a very frustrating and unhappy life with that kind of outlook. None of the things you asserted about feminism are true. There's no point in arguing with someone who refuses to accept reality and who makes up stuff to justify their fe… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/13 08:55 PM |
| 1 | Talk about "male disposability"!!Hmm... I'm a bit confused here. Can you be more specific about what I should be working on? I mean, I work out fairly often and eat pretty healthy. I'm pretty happy with how I look, but maybe I'm delusional or something? I mean, if you're saying I'm fat, and all perception tells me I'm not, then clearly there's something wrong with me. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/13 07:27 PM |
| 0 | Talk about "male disposability"!!Hey, you never got back to me yesterday. How fat am I, exactly? I'm really curious about this, cuz as far as I can tell, I'm in great shape. What are my problem areas? Do I have fat hands or something? | /r/MensRights | 21/11/13 06:34 PM |
| 2 | Talk about "male disposability"!!Are you saying that feminists are for those things? Cuz if that's the assumption you're operating under, you should know, that's not true. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/13 01:34 AM |
| 5 | Talk about "male disposability"!!You don't think it's a valid point? I mean, should "men's rights" really be about bringing down feminism? Or should it be about the legitimate issues men face, like rape, gender roles, custody, incarceration, etc.? | /r/MensRights | 20/11/13 06:00 PM |
| 1 | Innocent man burned to death after vigilantes branded him a paedophileYou should just ban him for spamming. Most of his comments are just copypasted pedophile apologia. Same crap over and over and it's all dubiously sourced and things taken out of context plus a bunch of outright lies. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/13 05:31 PM |
| -15 | Apparently, the comic book world is full of womanhaters.The amount cognitive dissonance within the MR community is astounding. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/13 11:25 PM |
| 0 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processNo, I just got tired of you restating the same shit over and over and not actually rebutting my arguments counterarguments, just statements of "you're wrong". The two main arguments you made: A meat-free diet is unhealthy and leads to malnourishment and death. That's clearly untrue and I provided a link to the wikipedia section dealing with it which cites many studies. You did not provide any citations or even a clear argument as to why. Meat production is better for the environment than non-mea… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 11:28 PM |
| 0 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processI realized a while ago that you are crazy. There's no point in having a discussion with you. I care as much about changing your mind as I do about changing the mind of a mango. The downvotes just make me chuckle because it's a good indication of how poorly you debate. There's no way I'm going to trust someone to debate in good faith when they're so unable to disconnect from their emotions that they start shamelessly throwing out downvotes. It also is kinda funny because it shows that you actuall… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 11:03 PM |
| 2 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processYou're clearly unhinged. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 10:55 PM |
| 0 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processThat wasn't a complaint. You should head to your closest elementary school for a course in reading comprehension. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 10:53 PM |
| 2 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processYeah... that's not at all what I said. You might need some help. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 10:45 PM |
| 0 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processWhere did I complain about downvotes? I couldn't care less about karma. I just thought it was funny how flustered you were getting over what other people eat. Silly little redditor. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 10:44 PM |
| 1 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processIn the first world, you can choose what you eat because there is a wide variety of healthy choices available to you. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 06:07 PM |
| 2 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processHardly. Meat eaters aren't upset about what other people eat. It's just some intelligent people can't stand when idiots (vegans) peddle their bullshit (veganism). Seems like this imaginary phenomenon really gets you upset. Does it always upset you when others do things differently than you? Because even if what you're describing really happens, it doesn't nearly as often as you've imagined, and even if it did, you really shouldn't let it get to you. Which means they need protein from plant sourc… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 04:36 PM |
| 0 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processThat assumes you know what the intended effect is. People are vegan for all kinds of different reasons. Those emotional downvotes are cute. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 04:25 PM |
| 0 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processYou said that being a vegan is "wrong", based on the fact that you think it's a "fruitless effort". That assumes you know what their motivation for being vegan is. You don't. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 04:23 PM |
| 0 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processYeah, you've just proven your utter ignorance on this topic. There's no point in me continuing as it'd be the same as arguing with a cat. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 04:18 PM |
| 1 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processApologies, I seem to have mixed you up with another person in this thread. You're right, you don't really seem to care what other people eat. Good on you. Enjoy your meat and I'll enjoy my non-meat. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 04:16 PM |
| 2 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processActually, vegans give a fuck about what everyone eats, they're often very insufferable about it. No.. not really. There are a few loud ones, but really, there're more meat eaters like you who get upset about what other people eat. No, vegans are being counterproductive by trying to move towards more grain crops. Meat eaters are the only ones pushing for the move back to farming with grass. What? LOL. There are so many leaps in logic here. "Vegans" aren't trying to do anything except not eat anim… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 04:13 PM |
| 2 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processYa sure seem to. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 04:05 PM |
| 0 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processWho is "they"? "Vegans"? You're the moron if you think all vegans are vegan for the same reasons. Heck, not all vegans even follow the same sets of rules. And why do you care so much? How does it affect you in any way? You should just be happy there's more meat for you. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 04:04 PM |
| 2 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processSo eat less meat. Vegans and vegetarians have an effect on our net meat consumption. If reduced meat consumption is what you're advocating, you should be happy about vegans. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 04:01 PM |
| 1 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processYeah, it's probably not possible for everyone to become a vegan. So what? It's sure possible for some people to do it. Is that moronic? What's moronic about it? They're doing less damage than most people. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:59 PM |
| 2 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processA group of 100 people who all eat meat at the average current rate eat more meat than a group of 100 of which half eat meat at our current rate. People aren't going to just start reducing their meat consumption, just like people aren't going to reduce their meat consumption to the levels you suggest. So, to call those who don't eat meat "moronic" is stupid because they're having a greater net effect on the issue than you are. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:57 PM |
| 2 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processFirst of all, most vegans don't give a fuck what you eat. Nobody is arguing that farm animals shouldn't be eating grass. We would have to drastically reduce our meat consumption to move towards a mass farming system based on grass. Vegans are doing more to help with this than meat eaters. A vegetarians live longer than meat eaters, so quit this bullshit about it being unhealthy. You're a farm boy, not a fucking doctor. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:54 PM |
| 3 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processIt can be produced that way. In MUCH smaller quantities. But it's not. So I don't see what your point is. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:47 PM |
| 1 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court process"Moronic"? Really? And they say vegans are awful and annoying. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:46 PM |
| 1 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processLOL | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:45 PM |
| 2 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processWait wait wait... so you're saying that if fewer people ate meat, the world would be better off because we'd no longer have to do factory farming? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:45 PM |
| 2 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processAnd once again, you're arguing like a feminist. Straw man right there. Plus, being fucking stupid as I'm referencing a book written by one. Wow... okay buddy. So everything everything every MRA has said has been the representation of every other MRA? Good luck with that one. You just need grass. There's not enough grass in the world to support our rate of meat production. Sure, a tiny percent of meat currently is produced using grass, but that's just not how it's done. If it were somehow possibl… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:43 PM |
| 2 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processYet, that's not how meat is produced. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:40 PM |
| 2 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processThat method doesn't scale to support our rate of meat consumption. Enjoy the yummy dead bodies! | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:33 PM |
| 1 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processThat's not how farms work though. That method cannot sustain our rate of meat consumption. Not even close. Also, even if that were possible, meat would have to be incredibly expensive. There's only so many pounds of meat you can produce per acre. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:30 PM |
| 1 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processYou'd discount what someone has to say, just because they're a feminist? My point is, it takes many pounds of grains to produce a single pound of meat. So meat will always be worse for the environment than grain production. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:27 PM |
| 2 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processWhat the heck are you talking about? This is SIMPLE logic. It takes many pounds of grain to produce a single pound of meat. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:22 PM |
| 1 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processWe feed grains to animals. Many pounds of grain goes towards producing a single pound of meat. That's the part he laughably skips over. Meat production is BY FAR much worse for the environment and is is FAR less efficient than other types of food production. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:19 PM |
| 1 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processIt's irrelevant anyway, as his entire comment was full of illogical garbage. I mean, even the obvious stuff was ignored by him. He pretends that animals don't eat and that they would live forever if we didn't kill and eat them. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 06:53 PM |
| 1 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processSo is /u/anonlymouse just stupid? Is he unaware that farm animals eat? Is he deliberately spreading false info or is he a complete idiot? I mean, it's pretty straightforward and simple logic that eating farmed animals isn't nearly as efficient as eating plants. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 05:24 PM |
| 4 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diazotroph http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_fixation | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 05:07 PM |
| 8 | Vegetarian mother stopped carnivore dad seeing son for over a year, and had been refusing to engage in the court processAgriculture, particularly staple crops such as wheat, rice and soy do more damage to the environment and destroy more species than farming and hunting animals ever do. LOL What do you think we feed animals on a farm? | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 04:34 PM |
| 1 | "Don't Marry Any Woman Over 25": Remember, no matter what she looks like, she wasted her prettier years on other men.Citations needed | /r/TheRedPill | 08/08/13 09:24 PM |
| 3 | "Just suck his dick, play with his balls,fix him a sandwich, and don't talk so much and he'll be happy!" How men are reduced to primitive humans in everyday "jokes"Oh then there's no way it could be satire. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/13 08:20 AM |
| 4 | "Just suck his dick, play with his balls,fix him a sandwich, and don't talk so much and he'll be happy!" How men are reduced to primitive humans in everyday "jokes"We can't because she's dead. But many who knew her say she later claimed it was satire. | /r/MensRights | 12/07/13 11:30 PM |
| 3 | "Just suck his dick, play with his balls,fix him a sandwich, and don't talk so much and he'll be happy!" How men are reduced to primitive humans in everyday "jokes"Depends on who you ask. | /r/MensRights | 12/07/13 10:32 PM |
| 11 | "Just suck his dick, play with his balls,fix him a sandwich, and don't talk so much and he'll be happy!" How men are reduced to primitive humans in everyday "jokes""die cis scum" is a joke, but people sure get pissed about that one. | /r/MensRights | 12/07/13 10:02 PM |
| 14 | Of the 16 Annoying Things About Being A Girl, 14 are choices they make themselves (And one is a myth)How is this a men's rights issue? | /r/MensRights | 31/05/13 04:44 PM |
| 0 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)u want me 2 read all that? have fun walking home late at night without worrying about getting raped. buh bye | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 11:19 PM |
| 0 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)Did you just read my comment? lol, you don't even have two options, you seem to only have the one option to sit there and keep on trying to insult me. No... I have infinite options. You just don't like the one I've chosen. I could list a bunch of shit that women have to deal with that men don't, but what's the point? You could list supporting evidence for the existence of the color yellow, but what's the point? You don't get it. If you're able to convince a fundamentalist Christian that God does… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 10:52 PM |
| 0 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)To annoy me until I leave. Not sure what gave you that idea, but no. Would you care to challenge this fact or just accept it? Those aren't my only two options. I can just let you be wrong, laugh at you, and allow you to continue being a representative of the "men's rights movement", without being shown why you're so laughably wrong. That way, you'll keep spouting stupid shit and people will continue to think of the "men's rights movement" as the joke that it is. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 10:41 PM |
| 0 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)On what? What do you think my goal here is? there's nothing significant that they have to deal with that men don't. That's obviously an incorrect statement. So clearly incorrect that it isn't worth arguing about. You're doing more harm than good for the "men's rights movement" so why should I bother changing that? | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 10:28 PM |
| 0 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)there's nothing significant that they have to deal with that men don't. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 09:59 PM |
| 0 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)lol | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 08:58 PM |
| 0 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)You're an MRA. You stated earlier that women have it easier than men in every aspect of life except for their menstruation cycles. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 07:27 PM |
| 0 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)I was asking whether your lame comeback and downvotes alleviated any of the anger you feel towards women. You really aren't all there, are you? | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 07:20 PM |
| 2 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)Um... You failed. You missed part of my comment, and didn't actually make any corrections. Also, you misspelled "grammar". Seriously? | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 07:17 PM |
| 1 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)Actually, it does make sense. And attacking someone's grammar instead of their message just looks sad and desperate. It has a similar effect as your downvotes. You're petty and mad. Keep trying, little boy. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 07:13 PM |
| 1 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)Good one. Still hate women? | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 07:07 PM |
| 1 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)You're pushing the keys on the keyboard and words are coming out, but none of it is very meaningful. All I see is a very angry little boy. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 07:03 PM |
| 1 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)lol you don't know anything about me. You're an MRA. You know, like a white rights advocate, except for men. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 06:54 PM |
| 1 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)lol you don't know anything about me. You're an MRA. You know, like a white rights advocate, except for men. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 06:51 PM |
| 1 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)Why? Why should I? Why would I? And more importantly, what gave you any indication that I desired to do more than tease you for your deliberately blind views? | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 03:43 PM |
| 1 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)Convince me that the color yellow exists. Oh, and you do realize that you "lost" whatever you think this is, simply by being petty and downvoting my comments. Little boy. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/13 03:05 PM |
| 2 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)You know what makes this whole thing even more silly? You're not even arguing the right thing! You're supposed to be arguing that, yeah, women have it harder in some ways, but that men have it even harder in other ways. Except that's not what you're doing. That would have been something more worthy of debate. No. You are so nutty that even that would be giving women too much credit. So instead, you just expose yourself as mentally ill by denying that there's anything (well, besides their periods… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/13 10:05 PM |
| 1 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)Yeah... except I never was trying to debate you. In fact, I explicitly stated that I wasn't debating you. But if thinking you're winning an invented imaginary debate with a stranger on the Internet makes you feel more correct in your views, more power to you. Have you ever questioned your own beliefs? I mean, if you honestly think there's nothing women deal with that men don't, then you're clearly ignoring reality to the point that it'd be silly to debate with you. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/13 09:46 PM |
| 0 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)This is golden. Indulge me here... what exactly are you winning? | /r/MensRights | 21/05/13 09:26 PM |
| 1 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)I'm laughing at you, not trying to debate you. The fact that you honestly believe the silly things you're saying is pretty entertaining. There's no point in debating you. You've got a chip on your shoulder, and it's in your line of sight, preventing you from seeing reality. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/13 08:46 PM |
| 1 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)Wow. You honestly can't think of anything other than "periods"? You have a problem. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/13 08:30 PM |
| 1 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)That wasn't an ad hominem, it was a genuine question. Because either you've got a disability or you're just pretending to not be able to think of anything women deal with that men don't deal with. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/13 04:52 PM |
| 1 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)Do you have some kind of disability? | /r/MensRights | 20/05/13 03:24 PM |
| 2 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)I hope you're just playing dumb. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/13 09:50 AM |
| 2 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)You can't think of anything that women have to deal with that men don't? | /r/MensRights | 17/05/13 05:01 PM |
| 2 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)lol | /r/MensRights | 17/05/13 03:47 PM |
| 2 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)Seriously? | /r/MensRights | 17/05/13 03:31 PM |
| 6 | Fuck this. (x-post r/standupshots)You honestly believe that? Hell no, I wouldn't be a woman. I don't wanna deal with the shit they have to deal with. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/13 04:52 PM |
| 7 | Men's Rights necessarily always opposed to feminist principles?Wow. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/13 08:41 PM |
| 5 | Men's Rights necessarily always opposed to feminist principles?Yeah, women are such slaves to their emotions. Not like us men; we science. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/13 08:40 PM |
| 5 | Apparently she's an actual SRS subscriber.How would it serve them to pretend to be men? If anything, their arguments would be stronger if they weren't privileged. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/13 06:00 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.I never said you're opinion was invalid. I stated that we have different opinions and that I wasn't going to continue to argue about it. You couldn't accept that. You have to be right. That's petty. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/13 05:13 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.pathetic. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/13 05:08 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.You only know of the reasoning I've shared with you. I've got plenty more, it's just not worth my time. I don't need to justify an opinion to you for it to be valid. We have different opinions. Deal with it. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/13 04:53 PM |
| 2 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.My opinion is incorrect? My opinion that parents should support their children, financially, at the very least? That's "incorrect"? lol, okay buddy. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/13 04:44 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Accepting that people don't agree with you. You know how I can tell you're not taking this well? Besides the paragraph that I skimmed about how your opinion is correct, you went back and downvoted my comments. Are you still insisting that you're not being petty? | /r/MensRights | 26/03/13 04:34 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.This is incredibly hard for you, isn't it? | /r/MensRights | 26/03/13 04:25 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.You're being petty because you can't just accept that we have different opinions. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/13 03:58 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Well, if she's not poor, I'm assuming she works pretty hard and isn't around as often as if there were two parents. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/13 03:29 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Oh come on, you can't walk away without being petty? geez. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/13 03:28 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.And ignored the following paragraph that directly contradicts the point you were trying to make. That's the very definition of selective quoting. Then can you explain the point of the paragraph? The bank does not reduce your mortgage payments because you only see your kids on Wednesdays and weekends. It's still cheaper than having them the majority of the time. Western female privilege cringe white knight stupidity EXTREME cringe sexist feminist advocacy a bit vague state governments get paid to… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 10:18 PM |
| -1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.As I replied to that: To that, I say, fine. I guess that works. I'm not sure you're going to be able to convince the american people to cover the bills for deadbeats, but I'd honestly support something like that. I'd rather the burden be shifted from the father to the government/tax payers than from the father to the child. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 10:10 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.We disagree on some fundamental points that neither of us are going to be able to convince the other of. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 10:08 PM |
| 0 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.You're missing the point. Right now, men are not given an equal shot at being the primary parent, because of their gender. Do you think that's fair? No, and I never said anything to suggest that. In fact, I've repeatedly stated that the family court and child support systems could use some reformation. You seem to be missing the theme that unites all these issues: men being treated unfairly, as inferior, by family courts. Again, I've never said that. And that really isn't relevant to OPs post. H… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 10:07 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Sure, she can choose between several different options, none of which are as fair to the child as having financial support from both of it's parents. And yes, I guess adoption is a possible exception to this and I'm all for that. But sadly that doesn't happen very often. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 09:59 PM |
| 0 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.But that's only the fault of biology. The reason women can choose to have an abortion is because they're the ones who are pregnant. Men know that pregnancy is a possible outcome from sex and that they won't be able to control whether the woman has an abortion or not. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 09:56 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.I quoted an entire paragraph. I don't see the connection to the paragraph below it where he suggests that instead of the father paying child support, the government should cover him. To that, I say, fine. I guess that works. I'm not sure you're going to be able to convince the american people to cover the bills for deadbeats, but I'd honestly support something like that. I'd rather the burden be shifted from the father to the government/tax payers than from the father to the child. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 09:36 PM |
| -1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.What | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 09:32 PM |
| 0 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Of course it is relevant. You're discussing the responsibility of a parent to a child. Surely you don't believe that the only responsibility that exists is financial? No, but I believe it's the most a court should be able to compel. They can't very well force you to spend time with your kids. It's your responsibility to be a father, but if you're not going to do that, you should be legally obligated to help support your kids financially. Lynchings were also incredibly rare. So what? Does that me… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 09:31 PM |
| -1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Not in my opinion. But that brings us back to the abortion debate which I'm not willing to have with you here. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 09:25 PM |
| -1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.No forced abortions were suggested. How would this work then: The fair solution would be to make the father liable for half the cost of an abortion, plus half the financial equivalent to the inconvenience and health risk of temporary pregnancy and the abortion itself. That would of course have to be determined by a much more thorough analysis than this. Under that regime, a man and woman would accept roughly equal risk by choosing to have sex. Having a baby is not a risk of sex Sex ed in America… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 09:24 PM |
| 0 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Most moderate Christians feel abortion is murder but are okay with it? Source? Meh, actually, it's irrelevant to this discussion, I'm just curious. The father has NO CHOICE whether to pay child support or not even if he does not want the child. And neither does the mother. The father should be able to opt out of paying child support while an abortion is still able to be had. Shift the burden to the child; I see. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 09:20 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.So both mothers and fathers have something to offer as parents? Then wouldn't both a father and a mother be optimal? You disagree that children with two family incomes are better off than those with one? You deny that households with 2 working adults are less likely to be in poverty than families with one working adult? Do you deny that poverty negatively affects children? | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 09:17 PM |
| -1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Taking responsibility for someone else's choices is not being a "fucking adult", it's being a sucker. You choose to have sex, you're choosing to risk having a child. Pretty simple. Should men be given equal treatment before courts when attempting to win primary custodial parentage? That's not relevant. Should men be held financially responsible for supporting their rapists' children? That's incredibly rare. And it's irrelevant. We're not talking about cases of rape. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 09:02 PM |
| 0 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.I'm not sure I see what point you're trying to make. Woman chooses not to be a parent and has an abortion: Child doesn't exist Man chooses he doesn't want to be a parent: Child pays the price. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:52 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.I could just as easily twist your words around to say you don't think fathers are important and that men don't have anything to offer as parents. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:49 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.No, I didn't imply that. I said that households where parents are struggling to get by put stress on the whole family and often create environments of chaos. If there's only one parent there to provide financial support, that parent is more likely to struggle. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:46 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Oh well. I guess chaos is good for children, right? | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:43 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.I don't think anyone is here to debate abortion. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:41 PM |
| 2 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.The more the mother must struggle to support her child, the worse off the child. If you disagree, oh well. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:40 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Under that regime, a man and woman would accept roughly equal risk by choosing to have sex. The only way that sentence makes sense is if, after choosing to have sex, a woman loses her right to choose to have an abortion or not. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:38 PM |
| 2 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Is it fair that men can't give birth? No. And I never said it was fair that women get a few more months than men do to decide to be a mother or not. It's just the way things are. And I can't think of a way to legislate it into being fair in a way that is still fair to to the child. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:34 PM |
| -1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.First of all, even if the man gets a job, court still might demand more than he earns, in which case he is done. This isn't really an argument against a parent's responsibility to support their kids. As I've mentioned, I agree that reforms should be made to the family court and child support system. I am not arguing against all of the child support. And I would never avoid paying it. However, it can be unfair much often that we think. Then you disagree with OP as well. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:32 PM |
| 2 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Wait so you're pro-choice but also see abortion as murder? Hate to tell you this, but you've got a rather rare opinion. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:29 PM |
| -1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.The fair solution would be to make the father liable for half the cost of an abortion, plus half the financial equivalent to the inconvenience and health risk of temporary pregnancy and the abortion itself. That would of course have to be determined by a much more thorough analysis than this. Under that regime, a man and woman would accept roughly equal risk by choosing to have sex. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:20 PM |
| 4 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.I don't feel like having the abortion debate with you. You're anti-abortion. I'm not going to change your mind. We live in a country where abortion is legal. Therefore, we have to consider that when discussing parental rights. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:20 PM |
| 2 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Children living in poverty are in a bad situation, no doubt - whether they have one parent or two. Yeah, and it's a lot easier to be in poverty if one of the parents isn't helping out financially. However, I do not subscribe to the belief that being raised by a single parent has any real negative effect when compared to being raised by two parents. I do not believe having two parents is better than one. As I often put it, at least the child of a single parent has 50% less dysfunction to deal wit… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:17 PM |
| -1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.You suggested forcing women to have abortions. You call that reasonable? I disagree. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:10 PM |
| -3 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.That's not what this guy implied: The fair solution would be to make the father liable for half the cost of an abortion, plus half the financial equivalent to the inconvenience and health risk of temporary pregnancy and the abortion itself. That would of course have to be determined by a much more thorough analysis than this. Under that regime, a man and woman would accept roughly equal risk by choosing to have sex. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:08 PM |
| 7 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Such as? Can you think of any ways that don't fuck over the child? | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:04 PM |
| 1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Quit derailing. This is about whether a parent should be allowed to abandon their child or not. Nobody is going to force you to be part of their life, but you at least owe it to the child to help support him/her financially. Are you arguing that children are better off if they have less financial support from their parents? Are children who grow up in poverty better off? | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 08:00 PM |
| 0 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Getting a job because you had a kid, is what I call being a fucking adult. Things might get tough, but it's your duty as a parent. Parents illegally and immorally avoid child support payments waaaaaaay more often than people go to jail for it. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 07:56 PM |
| 0 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Wow... Okay buddy, I don't think it's worth my time to argue with extremists (suggesting forced abortions). Edit: also, it's not puritanical, it's just reality. If you have sex, a pregnancy can result. You're aware of that when you choose to have sex. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 07:54 PM |
| -2 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Saying that a single parent family will fuck over a child is incredibly ignorant. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying a child is better off with support from two parents than they are with the support of one. Pretty simple. If you abandon your child, you're fucking that kid over in many many ways. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 07:31 PM |
| -1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Yes, you are right about the fact that the kid should not be "fucked over". But what about not "fucking over" the father? It's strange that so many people here think of a father financially supporting his children as being "fucked over". It's called being a fucking adult and taking responsibility. Maybe, just maybe he should have a say when mother wants to give a baby out for adoption? He does. In fact, it's often a huge issue when a single mother wants to give a baby up for adoption and they do… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 07:29 PM |
| -2 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Well, biology is unfair, in that men can't decide. But I mean, the law is following biology, when it doesn't need to. The two are linked. The biology has a direct influence on the laws. Can you propose a solution that doesn't fuck over the child? I'm saying, men being able to carry and give birth would even things up a bit, and I wouldn't mind doing it, as a man, if I was able to. Then I could have a kid if I wanted one and the woman didn't. And it would be interesting to see her reaction if she… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 07:03 PM |
| -5 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.You must be new to the MRM. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 06:58 PM |
| 0 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Tell that to the men forced to pay the mothers of their children through the courts, even if it's not their child! That's not really relevant to the point OP was making. This is about whether you should be obligated to help support your children, financially at the very least. That is unfair on men, good point. I wouldn't say no to giving birth. Okay... not sure what your point is here. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 06:56 PM |
| -1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Take it however you want. I was making a point that all you're talking about is how you shouldn't have to pay to support your child. And you don't care how it affects your child. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 06:05 PM |
| 2 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Um.. what? I just told you that I agree that child custody cases are often fucked up. They very often fuck over fathers and children. It's still not relevant. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 05:58 PM |
| -3 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.MEMEMEMEMEMMEMEMEMEME!!!! What baby? | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 05:57 PM |
| 2 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.You keep bringing up that fathers often get fucked over in child custody cases. I agree. But it's not relevant. You're just bringing it up to turn this into a men vs women thing, when it's really just a children thing. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 05:55 PM |
| 0 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.You're arguing that its all for the kids. Fine. If women want to abort, thats ok. If they want the kid, the man has to pay, fine. Its for the kids, Yup. Exactly. The most important person in this situation is the child. But then why is it that men are disproportionately not allowed to be fathers to their kids in divorce hearing cases? From my perspective, it isnt about the kids but about the women. Its only about the kids when in favor of the woman, it seems. Again, not relevant. Try fixing that… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 05:49 PM |
| 0 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.If one of the parents don't want a kid, the kid is already fucked for life. That's a risk of having sex. Now that the child exists, you owe it to the child to support it, financially at the very least. The point here is the lack of say the father of the unborn has in the matter. He had his say when he chose to have sex. After that, it's her body. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 05:46 PM |
| -1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Okay... I was seriously asking you to clarify. I don't see how your comment was relevant to the discussion at hand and I asked you to explain. But hey, if you can't explain yourself, you're probably not worth talking to anyway. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 05:37 PM |
| 3 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.And suggestions for a solution that doesn't fuck a child over? If you're arguing that a father should be able to opt out of child support, you're forgetting that that fucks over the child. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 05:36 PM |
| -1 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Relevance? | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 05:34 PM |
| -7 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Care to propose a solution that doesn't fuck a kid over? | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 05:29 PM |
| 3 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.Pregnancy is a risk of having sex. Is that a new concept to you? Also, I never said it was fair. I explained that it's an unfair truth of biology. Care to suggest a remedy that doesn't fuck the kid? Woman decides to have an abortion: child doesn't exist Man decides to abandon his child, in all ways, including financially: child is fucked over. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 05:26 PM |
| 8 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.It's a clump of cells. But again, do you really want to have the abortion debate here? I get it, you're pro-life. That's fine, whatever. I'm not going to change your mind on abortion. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 05:25 PM |
| 6 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.It's still her body in my opinion, but I'm pro-choice. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 05:19 PM |
| 11 | So, I have to pay child support if she has the baby even though I don't want kids... but if I want to have the baby and she doesn't, I'm shit out of luck. Yeah, sounds fair to me.It's her body. You knew the risks when you had sex. The moment you choose to have sex, you give up the right to choose not to be a parent. Yes, she gets a few months longer to make her decision. And yeah, it doesn't seem fair. But that's just the way it is, because it's her body. It's not unfair because of laws or social stuff, it's unfair because of biology. It's unfair the way it's unfair that men can't ever give birth. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/13 05:00 PM |
| 9 | It's time this movement did a little cleanup.You're openly calling for people to brigade. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/13 09:48 PM |
| 5 | Why is the men's rights movement treated like a joke?Even mocking feminists makes it clear that there is something about feminism to be mocked. lol | /r/MensRights | 20/03/13 05:08 PM |
| 4 | It's time this movement did a little cleanup.So you're admitting you're a shitty person? edit: I guess so. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/13 12:39 AM |
| 4 | It's time this movement did a little cleanup.I have family who won't talk to me. Cause for self reflection, maybe? I don't care You should consider caring what people think of you. most of whom have been burned by women in ways I've never had to experience and I'm thankful for that. Relevance? I'm not a horrible person, not by the standards I judge women by. In my opinion, it sure doesn't help. But really what makes you a shitty person is this outlook: Quite frankly I want to sit here and laugh as the world burns because I know I'll come o… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/13 11:35 PM |
| 3 | It's time this movement did a little cleanup.Do the people in your life know that you're a horrible person? Or do you pretend to be normal around them? | /r/MensRights | 15/03/13 10:55 PM |
| 1 | It's time this movement did a little cleanup.Start introducing yourself to people in real life as a "Men's Rights Advocate" and see how seriously they take you. They'll take you as seriously as if you'd said you're a white supremacist. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/13 10:46 PM |
| 6 | It's time this movement did a little cleanup.You're kidding, right? | /r/MensRights | 15/03/13 10:10 PM |
| 22 | It's time this movement did a little cleanup.You may be the bravest person ever. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/13 08:46 PM |
| 15 | It's time this movement did a little cleanup.cringe | /r/MensRights | 15/03/13 08:39 PM |
| 16 | It's time this movement did a little cleanup.You think twox, or even the real world, for that matter, takes MRAs seriously? | /r/MensRights | 15/03/13 08:04 PM |
| 0 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?lol | /r/MensRights | 12/03/13 04:25 PM |
| 0 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?You're beginning to sound like a cliqued ratheist. "Checkmate, fundie! I LOGIC'd you." So, you're saying that women who abort or adopt out their children are total pieces of shit. No, I never said that. If a woman left her child with the child's father and decided to not be a part of the child's life, even financially, YES, she'd be a shitty person. I hope your dick falls off before you have a chance to leave more kids without a father. Keep the downvotes coming. They're the tears of the neckbea… | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 10:09 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?I think you're assuming I'm not a man. You're assuming I don't see the other side of the argument. But I really do. Even you didn't bother making a better argument for why a man should be able to ditch his kid other than it sucks to have to pay. I understand the urge to avoid responsibility, but it's immature and unrespectable. Yes, family court system has problems. But not being part of your kid's life is shameful and refusing to take financial responsibility for a child is more than shameful, … | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 10:05 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?You don't know anything about me other than that I feel parents should support their children, financially, at the very least. So to assume that you have more knowledge on the topic because of your job is silly because you don't know what I do. Also, to mention "knowledge" would imply that this is something that has a "correct" answer to it, when it's really just a matter of opinion. There isn't a "correct" answer, but there is a selfish/immature/spiteful side and an adult/responsible/respectabl… | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 09:47 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?lol. Wow. You're an awful person. I hope you lose your penis before you have a chance to impregnate someone. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 09:28 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Except men aren't the ones having kids. The women are. The issue is that women have all the power when it comes to reproductive rights, and can choose whether they want to be responsible for a child or not. Men aren't given this choice, so while the initial act (the sex) is the same, there is no option for the man after the fact, and they are the mercy of the woman's wishes entirely, even though they went into it together at the beginning. Does that seem fair? Does it seem fair to fuck over a ki… | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 09:23 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Wow. I've seen you mention that a few times now and I chose to ignore it because it speaks volumes about the kind of person you are. But shit, if that's how you see things, you've got bigger issues than greed and immaturity. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 09:16 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?There are lots of things that happen to adults, against their will, that require them to take responsibility for something they would rather not. You're still entirely ignoring that the kid didn't do shit to you to deserve you not supporting him/her. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 09:10 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Again, it's not about the mother. It's not about you. It's about the child. Your immaturity and selfishness is showing. We're talking at a very basic level: should a parent have the choice to remove their child from their lives entirely, including financially. My position is that if you have a kid, regardless of the circumstances, you owe it to that child to help support him/her, financially at the very least. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 09:04 PM |
| 0 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Grow up. If you have a kid, regardless of the circumstances, you're a total piece of shit if you don't help support it. It's really that simple. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 08:44 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?It's consent to supporting a child if one results. You can be pissed at the woman for not having an abortion or lying about contraception, but that doesn't get you out of helping support your child. That's the risk of having sex. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 08:41 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Well, then you're talking about something entirely different. I'm talking about your responsibility to your child to help support him or her, even if it's only financially. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 08:40 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?You'd care more about your money than any child you'd have. You don't see that child as your responsiblity; you see it as something the mother did to you, because that's how you view women. Don't make a child suffer because you're an immature greedy misogynist. Being an adult means that if you bring a child into this world, you support him/her. It's not about you. It's about the child deserving to have a father. Since you'd be incompetent as an actual father, the least you can do is help financi… | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 07:59 PM |
| 0 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?What? | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 07:57 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?What you said was gibberish. It doesn't even read straight. It's just a jumble of partially formed ideas. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 07:57 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Well, good luck getting reality to change. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 07:55 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?The man made his choice when he decided to have sex. The woman got a few months longer to make her choice, sure, but that's because it's her body. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 07:55 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Men should have the choice to be, or not to be parents. He does. He can choose to not have sex. Or he can get a vasectomy or wear a condom to reduce his risk of getting someone pregnant. But to say he doesn't owe it to the child that he helped create to help support it, is unfair to the child. Just because a woman gets pregnant does not mean that he should automatically have no choice, no say, and no options; Nor should he automatically be on the hook for 2 decades of payments to the mother of t… | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 07:52 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?A man walks away, the child is the one who suffers. The mother aborts, the baby doesn't exist. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 04:16 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?How can you give reproductive rights to someone who doesn't physically reproduce? What does reproductive rights mean to you when applied to a man? | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 04:15 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Then we disagree. You owe it to your kid to support him/her. It's called being an adult. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 04:10 PM |
| 0 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Except I'm not trolling, I'm debating. You're making yourself look like a fool. I haven't said anything to indicated trolling. I'm having a genuine conversational debate. You can't handle that so you're calling troll on me. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 04:06 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Not what I said. In fact, that doesn't even make sense. Buh bye! | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 04:04 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?It's relavent because it means it's her who decides whether to have an abortion or not. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 05:53 AM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?My point is there's a reason women get a few more months than men do to make the decision. And it's their decision. And once that child is born, the father has a responsibility to help support him/her, financially, at the very least. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 05:49 AM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?I disagree with your opinion. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/13 01:53 AM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?I am saying that men should have reproductive rights, just as woman should have reproductive rights. But men do not physically reproduce. Yes, they contribute (a sperm), but they don't have a fetus inside them for 9 months and then birth it into the world. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 11:45 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?I am not prolife, I am reversing your own arguments, just flipping the genders in an attempt to show you how ridiculous your own statements are. You flipped the wrong part. For it to be true equality, men would have to be able to give birth. Women are both privileged and cursed to have this ability. In all reality I fully support a woman's right to choose, Just as I fully support an Man's right to choose. But when these conflict, shouldn't the final decision be up to the person whose body is bei… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 11:31 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Equality in this situation would mean pregnant men. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 11:28 PM |
| 0 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?It's possible to have a different opinion than you without being a troll. I 100% sincerely believe non-custodial parents should be required to, at the very least, help support their children financially. And that's not an extreme or irrational position to hold. The rest of your shit is all just incoherent ramblings. Keep downvoting like it means something other than "you're getting me really upset". | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 11:21 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?You're trying to force "equality" onto something that is biologically governed. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 11:01 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?then too a woman accepts the risk of having a child when she has sex, and understands that she needs consent of the father to have an abortion If a woman wants an abortion, that's her right. She should be forced into parenthood just a man is, after all, as you put it, that is the accepted risk of sex. She should be denied her right to choosing an abortion? A woman has the right to do with her body as she wishes. It's not for men, or anybody else to dictate. 2nd point, Again... by your own logic,… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 10:59 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?"But women do [some shitty thing]!" is not an argument for why men should be able to do a shitty thing. The child is the one who suffers from both of these so it's not fair to say two wrongs make a right. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 10:52 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?You're trying to force equality into an area dictated by differences in biology. And in the end, completely ignoring the child. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 10:50 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?That's what I found in ten seconds of searching. Which means you should easily find more. That's not how statistics work. It's still not a relevant argument that men shouldn't have to help support their kids. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 10:24 PM |
| 0 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Who said anything about anyone forcing anyone to do anything? You asked if it should be the woman's responsibility, and I asked "Why not?" By saying it should be a woman's responsibility to have an abortion if the father request it, you are implying she must do it or face legal consequences. It's not a stretch at all to call that being "forced". If he has no say in whether or not that child is born, then why should he automatically be responsible? He knew the risks when he decided to have sex. Y… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 10:21 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?LOL Dailymail says it happened once so it's a huge epidemic. So because that happens occasionally (very rarely), it means fathers shouldn't have to support their children? I don't see how that is related. Kids deserve support from both their parents. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 10:09 PM |
| 0 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Why not Because we do not force people to have medical procedures done on them. The rest of your comment is arguing about perceived flaws in the child support system. Nobody is saying it's perfect or couldn't have a few changes made to it. This debate is about whether a father is responsible for helping support his child. Yeah, it's totally equitable and in the best interests of the child (sarcasm). It's punishment for the man, plain and simple. If you really think children are better off withou… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 10:03 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?A mother can put a child up for adoption without a father's consent, even after the father has displayed an interest in being a father? | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 09:58 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Ok.. by what your saying is that Men should get the ability to force / prevent abortions, and the ability to stop / force adoptions? No, nobody should have the right to decide what happens to someone else' body. Why? Because you are saying that having sex, is a legally binding consent to parenthood. If you're a man and decide to have sex with someone, once you've done it, it's no longer in your hands. At that point, yes, a woman may choose to have an abortion, but that's because it's her body. Y… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 09:38 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?a person is only a parent if they choose to be. That's not how reality works. You choose to accept the risk of having a child when you choose to have sex. Women can choose not to become moms, and men should have the right to not become Dads. The problem with this perspective is that it leaves you with either being able to force a woman to have an abortion or leaving a child without a father. When you have sex you are committing to being a father (financially, at the very least) if a child is pro… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 09:32 PM |
| -1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?You're saying, that although both the man and the woman created the baby, it's the woman's responsibility to get an abortion if the father isn't interested in being a father? When they decided to have sex they both took on the risk of parenthood. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 09:27 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?How is that solely the mother's responsibility? It takes 2 to make a baby. Both the man and woman know the risks of having sex. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 09:24 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Is it really that controversial not to force a person to pay life long support for a child they never intended to have, or did not want to keep? Yeah, because you're choosing the father over the child. The child didn't do anything to deserve not having the support of his/her father. Yet the father knew the risks involved when he chose to have sex. Her choice, Her financial obligation. Their choice (having sex), Their financial obligation. You can't just go around fucking women with the assumptio… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 09:22 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?You totally failed to consider the child. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 09:03 PM |
| 1 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?What does any of that have to do with a parent's responsibility to their child? | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 08:46 PM |
| 4 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Huh? Do you think children are better off with a single parent? Do you think children don't deserve two parents? Do you think men shouldn't share responsibility for their child? Single parent home, fine. But if you have a kid, at the very least you're responsible to help support him/her financially. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 07:43 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?What if there was never the intent to have a child, and preventive measures failed? That's the risk you take when you have sex. It was a risk for both the man and the woman. If the father wants the fetus to be aborted, and mom refuses and keeps the child against father's wishes, she has the right to do so, but she should not be able to collect child support. The father has no right to force the mother to have an abortion because it's her body and we don't force medical procedures on people. Once… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 07:24 PM |
| 2 | If a man wants the woman to have an abortion, but the woman does not, why must he still pay child support?Because it's her body. And once the child is born, the child is entitled to have, at the very minimum, financial support from her/his father. Should have been more careful with contraception or make better choices. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 07:14 PM |
| 4 | Does this subreddit have a bad image across reddit? Or is this guy just a troll?Take a look around AVoiceForMen. Some pretty horrible stuff there, for it being the goto men's rights site. http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/challenging-the-etiology-of-rape/ Then you've got the Red Pill subset of MRAs and all the horrible blogs with the same mindset. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/13 07:11 PM |
| -4 | I don't even know what to say about this banner.Well, what's the statistic on for? If it's less than "twice as likely", then maybe it makes sense they focused on men. Also, men are usually larger and able to cause more damage. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/13 05:32 PM |
| -4 | I don't even know what to say about this banner.Or you're just seeing something where you want to see it. That, or your projecting your own prejudices. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/13 04:26 PM |
| -2 | I don't even know what to say about this banner.Um... If you're arguing that the cycle of DV exists in both men and women, you're not doing a very good job by denying that it happens. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/13 05:40 AM |
| 0 | I don't even know what to say about this banner.You're the one making those assumptions. That said, I think maybe it'd have been better if they had showed siblings, a boy and a girl. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/13 05:36 AM |
| -1 | I don't even know what to say about this banner.I guess I can see it being a bit better if they showed 2 siblings, one boy and one girl. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/13 05:35 AM |
| -5 | I don't even know what to say about this banner.I don't see how this perpetuates the stance if it doesn't mention the sex of the abuser. I don't really see how the sex of the child implies the sex of the abuser either. Maybe this is just your own prejudices causing you to see what you want to see? | /r/MensRights | 12/02/13 01:34 AM |
| -2 | I don't even know what to say about this banner.Kind of a stretch, really. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/13 01:33 AM |
| 17 | I don't even know what to say about this banner.Where does it say or even imply that it's the father that's the perpetrator of the domestic abuse? | /r/MensRights | 12/02/13 12:26 AM |
| 20 | Radical feminists shout anti-rape slogans after stripping naked in The LouvreWhat does this have to do with men's rights? | /r/MensRights | 11/02/13 10:09 PM |
| 1 | How Feminism Has Murdered the WestAre you saying that a mother who doesn't work isn't depending on a man? Can't you see how relying on another person for survival could put her in a shitty position? | /r/MensRights | 27/01/13 03:27 AM |
| 2 | Aggressive girl attacks schoolboy, coaxes him to hit her back.No, I get what it means, it just didn't fit the way he used it. He made himself look like an idiot and then tried to mock me as if I was the idiot. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/13 04:23 PM |
| 6 | Aggressive girl attacks schoolboy, coaxes him to hit her back.Good one. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/13 12:25 AM |
| 9 | Aggressive girl attacks schoolboy, coaxes him to hit her back.Oh, you're not "all there". I get it now. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/13 12:16 AM |
| 7 | Aggressive girl attacks schoolboy, coaxes him to hit her back.Did you watch the video? The guy easily could have walked away. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/13 11:59 PM |
| 12 | Aggressive girl attacks schoolboy, coaxes him to hit her back.Wait, so which is it? Self defense or retribution? Self defense would be blocking a punch or holding the person down till they're calm or perhaps even the threat of violence. But punching someone because they punched you is just trying to get even. | /r/MensRights | 17/01/13 11:37 PM |
| -1 | If a man had done this, title would've been "Man steals train, crashes into building." But look how gender-neutral Sweden publishes a woman's crime.Good one. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 09:24 PM |
| 1 | If a man had done this, title would've been "Man steals train, crashes into building." But look how gender-neutral Sweden publishes a woman's crime.By that logic, you've just confirmed the stereotype that men are dumb. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 08:38 PM |
| 3 | If a man had done this, title would've been "Man steals train, crashes into building." But look how gender-neutral Sweden publishes a woman's crime.Way to focus on the important aspects of the MRM. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 08:13 PM |
| 2 | I smell the stink of fear - Paul Elam asks "Can you hear me NOW?"Are you saying the MRM doesn't have the same problem? | /r/MensRights | 15/01/13 07:47 PM |
| -1 | Honest Question: Why do you folks not believe that we live in a patriarchy?What? | /r/MensRights | 11/01/13 02:28 AM |
| 7 | Honest Question: Why do you folks not believe that we live in a patriarchy?You sure made a lot of personal assumptions about the OP. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/13 10:11 PM |
| 2 | "You taught him it wasn't his fault"...You're quite dense. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/13 07:07 PM |
| 5 | The Gawker was banned for revealing the identity of one person. A Voice For Men runs a site devoted to revealing the identities of thousands. Why is AVfM on the sidebar and why are links to it permitted?aww the mods are embarrassed | /r/MensRights | 21/12/12 05:03 PM |
| -2 | The Gawker was banned for revealing the identity of one person. A Voice For Men runs a site devoted to revealing the identities of thousands. Why is AVfM on the sidebar and why are links to it permitted?Seriously, why can't people understand this? VA did lose his job. Sure. But it wasn't Gawker's fault. He lost his job because his boss found out about his shitty behavior on the internet. VA should have been more careful about how he behaved. What got him fired was the truth about him. He got himself fired. | /r/MensRights | 20/12/12 11:57 PM |
| 8 | A white knight's lifeMany MRAs like to say creepy shit to women. They get mad when other men tell them they're being creepy. The only way they can rationalize someone calling them out is to assume the guy is just trying to get laid. It's a shitty characterization of men because it assumes they are a slave to their sexual drive. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/12 05:52 PM |
| 26 | Merry Christmas. The package has been delivered.Putting this screenshot here, now that the mod's comment has been deleted. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/12 08:03 PM |
| 5 | How to get banned from r/feminism: "if feminism actually is an egalitarian movement it would focus on the victims of both genders."Free speech? What does this have to do with free speech? | /r/MensRights | 11/12/12 12:27 AM |
| 4 | Far Cry 3 and "rape"Wait... So /r/mensrights acknowledges that rape culture exists? | /r/MensRights | 03/12/12 10:17 PM |
| 1 | This happens all the time to so many men.I don't actually have any idea what you guys are talking about. I just thought it was funny. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/12 09:48 PM |
| 2 | This happens all the time to so many men.http://i.imgur.com/I1wZ3.png | /r/MensRights | 21/11/12 02:54 AM |
| -1 | Domestic Violence: women are half the problemFuck SRS and fuck the "men's rights movement". | /r/MensRights | 25/08/12 06:50 AM |
| -1 | Domestic Violence: women are half the problemHow do you know it was downvoted when I made the comment, 13 hours ago? | /r/MensRights | 25/08/12 06:49 AM |
| 9 | Domestic Violence: women are half the problemSo this is what the MRM really is about? And the only voice of dissent is from outsiders and SRD people? Great, that makes it that much easier for me to write off the MRM as misogynist creeps and child molesters. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/12 05:15 PM |
| 0 | My virginity's getting in the way. Going to Amsterdam...OP | /r/seduction | 24/06/12 02:17 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter