TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ComfortableConcern76 Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by ComfortableConcern76 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Interesting never thought of it that way. I always view it as having support for your feelings and beliefs in early childhood, but that could very well be the case as well.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 01:59 AM
28

The willingness to go against the social conditioning and stand on her own principles, rather than the principles that are aligned with accepted norms, that are "safe," makes her really attractive.
/r/AntiFeminists30/12/22 11:27 PM
2

What similarities? Casey Anthony is a much better actor.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/22 08:30 PM
1

I value your skepticism. And seeing that if true, it's at such a high level, hierarchically, that it is hard to "prove" definitively. That being said, the evidence, to me is, profoundly intriguing.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/22 11:54 PM
3

2 things: (1) I find it interesting that the dismissive tactics are very similar to those taught by psychologists in order to deal with the perception manipulation that narcissists create against you with friends and loved ones. (2) Whether "the patriarchy" is factually accurate or an ideological weapon it was created by those that control "the patriarchy" at the very top: the female illuminati. If this sounds ridiculous to you, good! And I'd invite you to look into the work of Michael Tsarion o…
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/22 04:27 PM
9

It's called Disassociative Identity Disorder.
/r/AntiFeminists26/12/22 02:02 AM
5

Do you SEE this fucking shit???!?!?! My fucking God!!!! This cunt doesn't know how to use TL;DR properly!!! The nerve of this piece of shit!!!!
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 02:37 AM
17

Unpopular opinion: what she says about "Behold A Pale Horse" bothers me more than her sexual proclivities. What she does with her own time is her choice, but the smugnorant dismissal based on a b.s. straw man argument is indicative of why we have morons denying facts based on post-modernist ideologies that don't map over actual reality. They don't allow schizophrenics to be United States Naval Intelligence team members. It's not a theory if it's verifiable and documented collusion.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/21 01:18 PM
2

The Red Pill is a 2016 American documentary film directed by Cassie Jaye.
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 04:20 AM
1

Deserve: yes Expect: no
/r/AntiFeminists16/10/21 06:59 PM
3

Not a link but there's a good book you could read for the current time we're living in. It's called "COVID Operation" and it dives deep into the corruption and totalitarianism of The Rockefeller Foundation, Gavi, Bill and Melinda Gates, the WHO, Wuhan, the list goes on... Written by two very mainstream folks, Pamela Popper and Shane Prier. All sources cited. All conspiracy, no theory.
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 09:08 AM
3

Yup! And Gloria Steinem was approached by the CIA to write her books. I appreciate you posting this. So many have no idea who is behind their social movements. Most movements are started with good intentions but then taken over by criminals to seed division. It's a good ploy, they use those who already believe very strongly towards an ideology and they lean on them hard pretending it's support and "a matter of national security" type garbage, influencing the previously altruistic to become more …
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/21 08:59 AM
1

"You are the one that is claiming scientism." What? This sentence does not even make sense. Claiming scientism. "Next year class, we'll learn how to make complete sentences without any gaps in the underlying structure of meaning. Won't that be fun!?" What I am claiming is that there are people that don't actually do research, and just parrot what propagandist MSM like CNN or MSNBC are saying, and then they parrot the mantra "follow the science" when they didn't actually follow or do ANY scientif…
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 02:38 PM
2

Hate to say it man, but all I hear is the voices of cognitive dissonance and naivete singing an all so familiar tune. Papers get buried regularly. Big money backs certain info while suppressing other info. All the time. Go look at Wellness Forum Health. They will show you how the corruption is done in this area. They have about a 99% success rate with their students as well, if that helps. Science can be manipulated, it is not perfect. I mean hell... It can be swayed just on the simple basis of …
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 01:36 PM
1

With all due respect, I don't think you get it. The people that fund the peer-reviewed studies - in this, the current state of the medical industrial complex run by corporate and intelligence agency kleptocrats - are the ones with conflicts of interest. Another common sense point; all those that were strongly opposed to big pharma, because of their blatant atrocities over the years, are now the ones crying for them as our savior? I mean does that not raise at least one eyebrow?
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 01:21 PM
1

You can go read the elites' very own books and papers themselves. They will tell you everything you claim is nonsense is their very game plan. We're talking about the likes of major sociopolitical and geopolitical think tank influencers like Zbignew Brazinzky, Carol Quigley, Julius and Aldous Huxley, H.G. Wells (a known Fabian Socialist that has his likeness imbedded in their iconography), the Galten family. The list goes on and on and on. No theory, all conspiracy. And an open one at that.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 01:00 PM
1

Here even more info specifically regarding the mask issue: ICYMI - From The Last American Vagabond thelastamericanvagabond.com Most Recent Mask Studies https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257385v1.full-text https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987720333028 https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/ 5 NIH/National Library of Medicine studies from 2004-2020 all finding verifiable health effects from wearing a face mask, including scientifically verified reduction in …
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 12:51 PM
2

Actually not misinfo... It's an opposing view. If you can't* question it, it's not science. It's dogma. Just look up the size of the virus, and then look up the size of masks' textile thread count. Everything we'd previously known about the past 30-40 years of virus research was tossed out the window when CV hit. There's a woman named Pamela Popper of Wellness Forum Health. Her company's main function is to educate people on how to sift through the 90% medical propaganda that's created by our co…
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 12:44 PM
6

Any truth to your username?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/10/21 12:31 PM
9

S01E07
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/10/21 12:30 PM
13

Ever see the Rick & Morty episode, "Raising Gazorpazorp"?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/10/21 10:39 AM
1

It's not just one article about masks. It's many, many, many, many scientists, doctors, and insiders risking their careers and livelihoods to disclose that masks are a bunch of malarky and that the experimental gene therapy is dangerous.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 10:26 AM
1

The scientific consensus does indeed have nothing to do with what the predatory globalists/Atlanticists pay their corrupt scientists to spout dogmatically for the purpose of the eugenics and transhumanist agendas. The gen pop just gobbles this all up because they have been trained by Pavlovian and Millgram Experiment-style indoctrination/mind control.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 10:21 AM
2

I think you're both right.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 10:16 AM
1

On any given Orwellian Sunday at that. It's a childishly indignant way of saying "I don't agree with you" at this point. While simultaneously seeking the higher moral ground so they can marginalize you and your good sense-making. Thank you for this comment above. Don't see enough of this out there in the social media circus. I will fully blow you just for that mask comment. "Duuuuuhhh, electrolytes make virus grow big-big. Big-big more than mask thread count. Deeeurr...Right boss...?"
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 10:13 AM
1

What is the opposite of a conspiracy theorist, a coincidence theorist? Don't let anyone put you in this box. A simple definition of a conspiracy is 2 or more people colluding against others. That's literally the totality of human history. Provable by mainstream standards. If anyone calls you a conspiracy theorist just laughingly correct them and tell them you're a researcher that verifies open evidence. Tell them they are wearing rose-colored glasses and are in collective denial (just don't use …
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 10:04 AM
1

What does everyone think about alt. schools like Montessori or Waldorf?
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 09:37 AM
2

Yup ...because ethics and morals only exist in societies where there aren't any kleptocratic "leaders" who feel threatened by men who embrace healthy masculinity ...Because those societies will not tolerate high-chair tyrants, moral relativist mind-fuckery, or cultish dogma, and those men are ones that prevent these "leaders" and "teachers" from taking control, or they take them out.... Oh, but you thought it was about civil rights and equality, eh?
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 09:32 AM
2

And then for sex ed they show you pornography without the consent of the childrens' parents. It is insane.
/r/AntiFeminists12/10/21 09:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter